We had a similar problem about a month ago. The support I received from
them was outstanding. Here is what they suggested I do:
Try using our ftp site instead of the http site: If you right mouse click
on the Network update path, select ftp and it will automatically change to
the FTP site for
singing
I've been waiting,
for a GAL like you,
to come into my life.
Yea, waiting, for SP2
to make me feel alive.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?
What
What makes you think its not?
So, when you do netstat -a , doesnt it show your machine listening on 110?
-Original Message-
From: Fred Macondray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 Port 110 binding only to
Or 'My GAL's mad at me' from Madness ?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 May 2002 13:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?
singing
I've been waiting,
for a GAL like you,
to come into my life.
Yea, waiting, for SP2
to make me
I am so glad I'm drinking water this morning. It's much easier to clean
off my screen.
Thanks for the morning laugh as usual Andy,
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 X194
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Andy
Preparing to upgrade my NT4.0 SP5 / Exchange 5.5 server SP4 (1st server in
site) to Windows 2000. Why, it is the only remaining
DBC in my W2K domain and need to go to native mode for exchange 2000
server rollouts.
Anyone have any problems with preforming upgrades on a Exchange Box?
Should I
Speaking of 6.5, I installed it on one of my servers and the Antigen GUI is
extremely slow. Is that normal?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 6:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Antigen Question
We had a similar
Hmmm, I just downloaded a trial version of Melia and it seemed to have
talked OK to an Exchange 2000 server. Well, there is nothing very
sophisticated in talking to the message tracking logs I guess. But it
downloaded the GAL correctly too.
However the reports look very confused and many of them
www.messageone.com
/shameless plug
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Metric reporting
I need a good program to measure exchange traffic of all
kinds in and out of our
Isn't there a swynk list dedicated to certification banter?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question
Why do we go through this every three to six
I'd much rather use a mail client than OWA as my regular method of access.
-Original Message-
From: Jerzy Setmajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Ximian Exchange 2000
Why not use OWA?
From: tom [EMAIL
So any Promodag specialists here? :)
I installed a trial version and it is refusing to connect to my domain
controllers.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting
I am getting this error sending to one domain:
The original message was received at Thu, 2 May 2002 13:05:49 -0400 (EDT)
from mail.ourdomain.com [216.xxx.xxx.xxx]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 550 Access denied)
The definition I find
I Installed the ADC from the Ex2K CD and setup my connection agreements I
noticed that all the mailbox's for users
in the receipients container came over as mail enabled users.. Mailbox
info came over OK for users in other containers.
Was this due to not having the ADC from the SP2 CD
I'd say it's a DNS problem, as the 216.xxx.xxx.xxx does not accurately
reflect the public DNS info for ourdomain.com. Unless you're just
munging the info. It's public info anyway - don't munge it, it makes
troubleshooting a PITA.
Non-authoritative answer:
ourdomain.com MX preference = 10,
Sounds like they're blocking you.
Try connecting via telnet on port25 to see what gives.
Jerzy
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/06 Mon AM 10:58:22 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SMTP 550 Error
I am getting this error sending to one domain:
The
Isnt 550 the relay denied message?
-Original Message-
From: Jerzy Setmajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: SMTP 550 Error
Sounds like they're blocking you.
Try connecting via telnet on port25 to see what gives.
Jerzy
Never mind. Figured it out. One of my administrative groups does not have
any servers and happens to be first alphabetically. Promodag did not like
that and crapped out right away. After I renamed the admin group and dropped
it down to the bottom of the alphabet Promodag ran fine
-Original
But (s)he's an NTPro.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP 550 Error
I'd say it's a DNS problem, as the 216.xxx.xxx.xxx does not accurately
reflect
I changed the primary windows nt account. When I tried to change it back
to the original person it works but that person cannot get into there
e-mail folder, it says they do not have permission. It shows there name
as the primary Windows NT account.
Does it take time to sync?
Do you think that Promodag retrieves Tracking and Directory info slow? It
runs extremely slow on my machine.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting
Never mind.
I did munge the info.
mail.kacpi.com
216.141.241.124
Beaten paths are for beaten men.
Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002
Up to 120 minutes
Does it take time to sync?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you using exchange 5.5 if so go into the mailbox properties and change
the primary account back to the old one or check the permissions on the
mailbox of that user.
-Original Message-
From: David Fortuna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:30 AM
To: Exchange
Yes.
--
From: David Fortuna
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2002 10:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Changed the primary windows nt account
I changed the primary windows nt account. When I tried to change it back
to the
not an XCHPRO ;) DNS is prob my weakest area, where I suspect this is
headed.
We also have a similair problem sending email to aol.com addresses. No
denial message they just never get there (no jokes about sending mail to
aol.com; I know, I know ;)
AOL said it was due to 1 server that did not
it does seem to run slow on our machine too, but I was thinking it was the
box itself...plus we have some other things running on that machine. I am
happy with the product (and support) though.
dave
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May
Not really. I have noticed, however, that the Antigen 6.5 client seems to run
noticibly faster when it's running on some machine other than the server.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 5:51
To: Exchange Discussions
I just started using it today. It doesn't seem to run slow to me, but I have nothing
to compare it against. Love the amount of information I can get from it!
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 X194
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mine now craps out while importing distribution lists, toward the end of
that import.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting
I just started using it today. It doesn't
Go punch it into http://relays.osirusoft.com/cgi-bin/rbcheck.cgi
Then go get it removed from http://xbl.selward.cx
That's a start.
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:30 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
No, just wait 2 hours. Or do the registry hack that is documented in the
Exchange 5.5 FAQ item 3.46.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed the primary
very nice. Thanks. I was previously using the Black Hole feature in Sam
Spade.
Beaten paths are for beaten men.
Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes. We had to get a different version of the Antigen Client exe from Sybari
tech support. Once we replaced the exe that was orignally installed with the
new one the client worked just fine.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002
Yes. We had to get a different version of the Antigen Client exe from Sybari
tech support. Once we replaced the exe that was orignally installed with the
new one the client worked just fine.
_
List posting FAQ:
Hi All,
I'm hoping you can help me. This is what happens:
We're running Exch 5.5 Sp4 on NT4 Sp6.
I re-boot the server (or restart Exchange services). The server begins to
chew up memory gradually (pretty normal for Exchange). It goes beyond the
physical ram on the machine (256) but doesn't
Ok why's the virtual total set so low? Do you have more disk space? Why
not set it at a gig or so?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IS Crashing, HELP
Hi
I think I would re-apply sp4 first. Anything in the app event log by
any chance?
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IS Crashing, HELP
Hi All,
I'm
as the database grows, the report generation will slow...when my database
reaches 900MB, everything seems to run slow..so then I basically prune that
database to only include the last 4 weeks or so..
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06,
I could set it a lot higher, but what would that help? I have 256mb,
planning to upgrade to 512 physical, and we've only got about 35 mailboxes
(I would consider everyone a heavy user though).
Thanks
-Warren
Ok why's the virtual total set so low? Do you have more disk
space? Why
not
Nothing in the event logs that helps. I think I will re-apply Sp4 the next
time this problem crops up (running ok so far today).
Thanks
-Warren
I think I would re-apply sp4 first. Anything in the app event log by
any chance?
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
1) about 3.2 gigs
2) 35, all heavy users
3) nothing, honest. :) It did this a few times last week, then was fine for
about 6 days, now the same problem.
This particular machine is overdue for a Win2k upgrade as well, but this
problem seems to be Exchange related (and not OS) from what I can
With Win2k anything less the 512 for the virtual memory can cause
problems. That's just what I've found on my own and I'm sure other
people are going to flame and say that they get away with using a meg or
so and so. But it's a suggestion and take it at that. I usually set mine
to a gig total.
What AV software?
-Original Message-
From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IS Crashing, HELP
1) about 3.2 gigs
2) 35, all heavy users
3) nothing, honest. :) It did this a few times last week, then was
Actually, let me correct myself.
In order to run E2k on a .Net server, it will require E2k SP4
In order to run E2k with a .Net DC, we'll need E2k SP3
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, May 06, 2002 3:18 AM
Posted To: Exchange
All,
I have an X400 Bridgehead (5.5 SP4 with 21 X400 connectors) that for some
reason can no longer run Perfmon against the MTA or the MTA Connections
objects. Actually the objects don't even show up in Perfmon anymore. This
happens whether running perfmon local or remote. Any ideas?
TIA,
BM
Sharing this doesn't violate your NDA?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen
Mynhier
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?
Actually, let me correct myself.
In order to run E2k on a
You may also want to try this too:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider]
Rpc_Binding_Order=ncacn_ip_tcp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook
Hi Guys,
Should I be running the Forestprep and Domainprep utility on the Domain
Controller or the designated E2K Server ?
Thanks,
Raj
**This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that
is
Doesn't matter.
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forestprep/Domainprep
Hi Guys,
Should I be running the Forestprep and Domainprep utility on
the Domain Controller or the
On the designated exchange sever... it will do the rest on the Active
Directory for you..
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forestprep/Domainprep
Hi Guys,
Should I be running the
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forestprep/Domainprep
Hi Guys,
Should I be running the Forestprep and Domainprep utility on
the Domain Controller or the
I always run them from the Exchange Server. It ensures the intended box
sees the DC/GC.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forestprep/Domainprep
Hi
I would run forestprep against the Schema Master DC and domainprep against
the PDC Emulator or perhaps Domain Naming Master DC.
- Karen
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Trend Scanmail 3.6, scan engine 6.15. I stopped it for a while to help
troubleshoot. It didn't help at the time.
-Warren
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IS Crashing,
I wouldn't doubt that needing 512MB min paging space might be true for
Windows 2000 but, for what it is worth, for those still running on NT4 - I
used to run Exchange 5.5 SP3 on a Pentium 180 with 192MB ram running NT4
SP6a with the paging file set to 384 max and min with about 25 very heavy
To All:
Current environment
Test Lab Server 1
Compaq r3000
2 PII 333
1.5gig Ram
1x 4.1gig OS mirror
1x 9.1gig Log mirror
4x 18.1gig Information Store Raid 5
Windows NT 4sp6
Exchange 5.5sp4
Information Store Size 33.2gig (Single Instance) 51gig uncompressed.
768 mailboxes in information
Yeah, it imports the GAL without any problems, and it processes the logs
without returning errors, but the reports come out all wrong. The thech
support said that version 2.* of MELIA only supports up to Exchange 5.5,
and there will be a new release of MELIA in the second semester of this
year
There is a list just for MCSE and another for MCSD. I'm subscribed to
both, but there hasn't been any post in the last 2 months ;)
Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +351 967819600
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Thanks again
-Original Message-
From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forestprep/Domainprep
I would run forestprep against the Schema Master DC and domainprep against
the PDC Emulator or perhaps
Upgrade to E2K.
-Original Message-
From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
To All:
Current environment
Test Lab Server 1
Compaq r3000
2 PII
Not in Exch 5.5
-Original Message-
From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
To All:
Current environment
Test Lab Server 1
Compaq r3000
2 PII 333
1.5gig
Question: Why do you need to move the users to a single container?
-Original Message-
From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
Chris and Martin,
getting ready to be flamed
On the other side, on the Red Hat certification list there is a lot of
activity...
/getting ready to be flamed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier
Sent: segunda-feira, 6 de Maio de 2002 22:43
To:
Chris,
Currently all of our _wonderful_ users depend on the containers to help
them figure out who's at a center or to send email to everyone at that
center and we do not use address book views at this time. We have a high
transfer rate here and every time some moves from one center to another
Do you have the link to sign up for that list?
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 3:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question
getting ready to be flamed
On
If it were me, I'd start creating all new users in the default recipients
container and use restricted address book views and standard ABVs to mimic
what containers give you now. I'd stop transferring users between containers
ever until we were ready to move to E2K where the become
WIN2K (SP1) E2K:
I am getting WMI errors when trying to access the monitoring tab while
using the ESM, which is preventing me from to add different services to
monitor. It's not on every server just some and not all from the same
site. The WMI services are running on all servers.
The error is
- Original Message -
From: Karen McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 7:15 AM
The client definitely wants to implement dir sync, and we're going
to rearchitect it so that the Exchange server becomes the dirsync
server and that the 4 MS Mail PO's are requestors.
I have an Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000 server in the same
organisation/site.
I am trying to replicate the Exchange 5.5 folders over to the Exchange
2000 server.
I add the exchange 2000 server to the replicate to section of the
replicas tab in Exchange 5.5 admin program.
When I set the E5.5
I want to create a server script for a public folder that will move read
messages from one folder to another.
Can anyone offer assistance?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Hi All,
I've got an exchange 5.5 server that has port 110
listening only on 127.0.0.1. How can I change the
binding of the port to listen on the system's primary
IP?
Thanks in advance,
Fred
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health
After I delete a mailbox with the ADUG tool, it still shows up in System
Manager under SERVERS\server_name\first storage group\mailbox
store\mailboxes. There's an option to Purge the mailbox but I have a lot
to delete. How can I delete all the mailboxes easily?
TIA for any suggestions.
Hi all,
The company I work for has recently decided to look at a message archiving
solution for the crazy amount of email being stored.
We're currently running Exchange 5.5 Server, Exchange client 5 with about
8000 mailboxes. The solutions we're looking at are Enterprise Vault from
KVS, Archive
Where does one find the 'old Exchange Client'? I remember using it
back-in-the-day but where does one find it these days?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Best way to
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Lately multiple Outlook 2000 clients have called that they are not able to
move multiple messages within their mailboxes or to public folders. I
have confirmed that it is indeed a problem. It seems that any message
with an attachment, big or small, can only be moved one at a
You will find him in the Exchange2000 group ay yahoogroups.com.
Otherwise, he is still around.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chinnery Paul
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: totally OT:Ed
What is your configuration ?
Are both servers in the same forest\domain ?
What email addresses are being set in the recipient policies ?
Yours,
Julian Stone
Exchange 2000 Consultant
Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider
Tel:+44 (0) 1344 444349
Mobile: +44 (0) 7710
Both Exchange servers are domain controllers for the same domain. I
have not setup any extra recipient policies other than what was created
when Exchange was installed. The default policy has 2 addresses
ticked.
SMTP@skilled.com.au
X400c=AU,a:= ;p=Skilled Engineer;o=Victoria
I have
79 matches
Mail list logo
