Can you ping it by NAME or by IP Address?
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its
laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. This is not
::Sputter::
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I am using that, and got file blocking really tricked out with Don Ely's
list of attachments to block!
Thanks
You backup your server using an AV solution??? That seems strange... Not
to mention, impossible.
Now, if you're using ArcCrapIt, you're still in deep doodoo. It's a widely
known fact that while ArcCrapIt may back up your server, it is very unlikely
that it will restore in the event of a
Hope your flame proof.
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Restoration Solutions?
Alright, so what is the good backup solution for the Exchange databases?
We have not performed test
::High Five::
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
We ain't huggin! ;o) How about a secret handshake or something?
D
Incompetence: When you Earnestly
NT Backup works great if you need something simple.
As far as restoration procedures, I would suggest you read the DR
whitepapers on the MS Site. I would also suggest a spare server, running
exchange to do the test restores on. At a minimum, test restores should be
done every 90 days. That
::High Five Back at ya::
D
Burnout: Attitudes are contagious, mine might kill you. - -
http://www.despair.com
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I'm about to test his Exchange Client Connectivity problem myself...
Someone is not likely to enjoy the results... ;o)
D
The secret to success is - find out where the people are going and get
there first. (Mark Twain)
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Everyone should be using something of that sort, we would have a much better
email world that way.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Sorry bud, but you're
I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 standard server from IE 4.01 to 5.5 sp2and got up
to date on patches.
I am not sure this is the cause, but now internally clients connect fine (including
the VPN), owa works fine. However, when connecting over the internet, I get an error
Unable to open
There is no Secret Cabal handshake.
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Tyranny grows in strength by the oppression of those who dare speak out in
opposition of it. Rick Watson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1) Use NT Backup -- it's exchange aware after you install exchange.
2) Create a recovery server that's identical to your production box, just not on
the network
3) Restore. Lather, rinse, repeat.
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
I think he meant the Secret Cabal handshake. Oh wait, there is no Secret
Cabal.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
::High Five::
-Original
why U no answer me!?!
===
Amit the CyBer DooD
===
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Client Access Problem
For the love of god Stop sending the
Yes, yes, yes.
This is all very vexing.
I'm quite put out.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Connectivity Issue
I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 standard server from IE
Don,
sorry about the multiples. I didn't think they were getting posted. So I
tried an number of different ways. I actually was going to email just you
and ask if this list was updated real time.
I know it is unsecure, but that is really not my choice, I have just
really locked this machine down
Oops sorry! Great list Martin! :) I forgot about the first line of Don's
email that gave you credit for it. The Martin Blackstone list of
attachments to block... If it were a snake it would have bit me..ouch!
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Of course not.
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
There is no Secret Cabal handshake.
-- Drew
Visit
M Put out.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Connectivity Issue
Yes, yes, yes.
This is all very vexing.
I'm quite put out.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
So you have a PIX in front of your Exchange server??? When was this put in
place?
D
Incompetence: When you Earnestly Believe you can compensate for a lack of
skill by doubling your efforts, there's no end to what you can't do. - -
http://www.despair.com
-Original Message-
From: Ed
Normally, if the handshake to the cable guy has a 20 dollar bill attached to
it, you will get your cable as a secret for freewait..oh,cabal not
cable! Sorry!
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:08 PM
To: Exchange
The pix has been in place around a year. I wasn't kidding when I said I
was going to email you and ask, so I wasn't being a smart A**.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Yes. The AVAPI 1.0 only exposes the attachment table.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:44 PM
To:
If you've followed the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method [tm] referenced in
the FAQ, odds are you can restore the data without doing a restore,
otherwise this will serve as a good last test of your disaster recovery
procedures for the year.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
Well, having some familiarity with the PIX, you'd have to open around 64000
ports up to access Exchange from the internet. Unless you have hacked the
registry of the Exchange server to statically assign the ports that Exchange
uses for communications.
However, my question still stands... If
The reason you can no longer do this is because you have not set your static
RPC ports for the exchange server. This must have been done on the older
version and now that you have upgraded you will have to re-do it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I agree with this. This is a bad idea to open up this communication via the
internet. A better solution would be to implement a VPN solution using PPTP
directly to the server or another RAS Server. I'm not aware of any problems
running RAS on the Exchange box but I suppose it would depend on
Since those static mappings are done in the registry, what upgrade could
have changed that?
D
Saving the world from Brick Level Backups and PST's - Ed Crowley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:33 AM
To: Exchange
Oddly enough, he says they DO have a VPN solution in place...
D
A booming voice says, Wrong, cretin!, and you notice that you have turned
into a pile of dust.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:35 AM
To: Exchange
And when you say wide open can you explain how you accomplished this. All
traffic is dissallowed by default on the PIX. Unless you have ACL with
allow any any somewhere in there then your PIX is still closed. Also, is
this a 3 port PIX or 2. What version of IOS are your running?
Yes and it is wide open, any to any (it won't stay this way).
I havn't had it explained to me with viable content, but our company does
alot of work for other companies with secure networks. These networks
generally are not going to allow the vpn ports to be opened on their
network. However, we
I guess I'm confused. After re-reading the original post I'm not sure what
was actually upgraded. I see Exch 5.5 then IE 4.01. Did you upgrade
Internet Explorer Browser?
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:30 PM
To: Exchange
gotta loop?
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Under the clouds of war, it is humanity hanging on a cross of iron. --President
Dwight Eisenhower
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Either way... Double check the Registry settings for the RPC ports and let
us know. Upgrading Internet Explorer is always an interesting experience.
By the way...Why did you upgrade the browser on the Exchange Server. Are
you accessing the internet from the Exchange Server for some reason. You
I'm getting more and more confused with every post... ;o)
D
To measure the man, measure his heart. -Malcolm Stevenson Forbes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Client
How many of you did a test restore of your Exchange environment this year?
[1] Frightfully few I'm afraid. For those who know they didn't test as much
as they should, perhaps a new year resolution (and plan to achieve same) is
in order.
Join me now in scheduling your disaster recovery testing
Sorry for not being clear,
upgraded to 5.5 sp4
patched IIS
updated ie to 5.5 sp2 and security patches
This is kind of a weird situation, security was not a concern of this
company until around the last six months. I do want to close the machine
off from the internet as much as possible, but I
What are you using in your attempt to connect to the Exchange server over
the Internet?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Client Access
Sorry for not being clear,
upgraded to 5.5
Don't access the internet from it, I have no good explanation for why I
upgraded the browser.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
There's you answer. I think the upgrade to 5.5 SP4 would have reset the
static RPC ports defined previously. You can set this back...but, I would
not recommend doing so.
Your best bet is to implement a VPN solution if users wish to access the
Exchange Server via the Internet using a Mapi
Well, for OWA to work with the current patches, ya gotta have IE 5.5 sp2, eh?
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Do not be too moral. You may cheat yourself out of much life. So aim above
morality. Be not simply good; be good for
Oulook 2000 SP2
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
May 31st isn't a good day for me...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
How many of you did a test restore of your Exchange environment
Oh, there you go. SP4 would have changed things back the WAY they
SHOULD be.
D
Who's General Failure and why's he reading my disk? -Anon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I did lot's of testing and DR's for clients this year... I plan on having
to do more next year and the years to come. :o)
D
A TV can insult your intelligence, but nothing rubs it in like a computer.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
I suppose. If you accessing OWA from the Exchange Server I guess this would
be relevant.
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Client Access
Well, for OWA to work with the current
What's Disaster Recovery planning?
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
I did lot's of testing and DR's for clients this year... I plan on
Me either.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
May 31st isn't a good day for me...
-Original Message-
From: Chris
October 25th would be a bad day for me as well. That's my Birthday, not to
mention, it's a Friday. ;o)
D
Burnout: Attitudes are contagious, mine might kill you. - -
http://www.despair.com
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December
Did you set to 100MB for speed and Full for duplex setting on both your
server and switch?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: CRC errors
I
We have a set of 18 production servers that are specifically designed to
crash utterly and completely every 3-4 months. These are multi-purpose
servers so I get to DR Exchange on the average 3-5 times every time a total
crash occurs because some bozo touches the server after I do. Therefore I
Yes
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CRC errors
Did you set to 100MB for speed and Full for duplex setting on both your
server and switch?
Brian
-Original Message-
From:
I am using ScanMail for Exchange and when I setup the attachment filtering
option I noticed only inbound messages from an outside source are affected.
I read up and found that is correct, only messages queued thought the SMTP
connector are affected. So here is my question, what protocol does E2K
No, I haven't done that/
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CRC errors
are you also taking CRC errors on the serial int of your router out to the
ISP?
-Original
Hi All,
Whilst troubleshooting my NetBackup for Exchange, I revealed database
issues on my server. Any suggestions as to how to deal with this w/o
the backup it suggests?
Currently I only have 8 users on this box and all use it daily with
success. The Veritas tech suggested that I run the
When View, Hidden Recipients is chosen in the exchange administrator
application the application stops responding. I believe this is related to
a Internet custom recipient I created yesterday. It was designated as the
alternate recipient for regular exchange mailbox. It does not appear as
the
Thanks for your help! I apologize again for the multiples. I'm going to
leave it as it is and hopefully on monday my boss will agree not to expose
the server so much.
Thanks again
_
List posting FAQ:
I have an e-mail message sitting in my Exchange 5.5 IMS Outbound Queue that
states [421 Resource Unavailable]. Where can I go to find out what
this 421 message means exactly?
___
This e-mail, including any attachments, may
When View, Hidden Recipients is chosen in the Recipients container, the
admin app stops responding. I suspect this is related to an Internet
custom recipient I created, and hid yesterday. I forwarded an exchange
mailbox's messages to the Internet custom recipient.
Can you tell me how to recover
www.faqs.org | RFCs | 2821
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Bollhofer, Mary I. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMS -
I'm not familiar with the application, but it looks like it uses these
constants to build an LDAP path to the Exchange server.
=
Kyle M. Burns, MCSD, MCT
ECommerce Technology Manager
Centra Credit Union
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From:
By then it could be too late :(
-Original Message-
From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Client Connectivity
Thanks for your help! I apologize again for the multiples. I'm going to
leave it as it is and
I'm having some serious problems with my NT domain, have exhausted all my
resources, and don't know where else to look... any help would be
appreciated.
Symptoms:
My windows 98 clients on a different subnet are unable to log on to the
domain. (they are on the 172.22.64.0/255.255.252.0
Did you rerun the performance optimizer on the Exchange server following all
patches?
What order did you patch the server in?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
I wouldn't run eseutil unless it was my only choice.
IIf you're running the Enterprise version of Exchange, it's simplest to
create a new private store and move the mailboxes to the new store; the
database will then hold fresh copies of all of the data. If you're
running the Standard version of
I've done plenty of SP upgrades on Exchange and can unequivicably state that
it does NOT remove the static port mappings.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
This is an improper subnet for only 2 networks. Your using a class B
network and 6 bits from the third octet (252). This would yield 62 subnets
with 1022 hosts per subnet and a range of 4. (Check my math everyone).
Why not just close off all the bits for each subnet. Example:
172.22.64.0
Sounds good. But I have some questions:
1) How can I verify that I'm running the Enterprise version?
2) How can I check the SIS ratio?
3) Can I do this while users are using the system, or does everyone
need to be off?
4) How do I verify that I've completed the move?
If you can't tell,
SP Upgrades or Exchange upgrades. I believe he stated that he upgraded to
Exch 5.5 then SP4. The Exchange upgrade would have reset the RPC
portsI think. Not to mention, anytime you upgrade IE on a server be
prepared for something to happen you did not plan on.
-Original Message-
This is an improper subnet for only 2 networks. Your using a class B
network and 6 bits from the third octet (252). This would yield 62 subnets
with 1022 hosts per subnet and a range of 4. (Check my math everyone).
Why not just close off all the bits for each subnet. Example:
172.22.64.0
anytime you upgrade IE on a server be
prepared for something to happen you did not plan on.
I personally do not upgrade IE on a production server unless necessary, but
I have never had a problem whenever I have had to do it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
That's what I originally thought. That's something hard coded into the
registry and I don't know of too many apps that overwrite manual changes to
the registry...
D
Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can
survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com
Maybe so.. But what if you upgrade from 5.0 to 5.5 SP4? Which...by the way,
is what seems to be the case here but that part was left out.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Client
Where did you see that he upgraded from 5.0 to 5.5 SP4?I don't recall
that. Of course, his lack of detail is making this so much harder to
troubleshoot... ;o)
D
Delusions: There is no joy greater than soaring high on the wings of your
dreams, except maybe the joy of watching a dreamer
This is why I ask
Routers do not forward Netbios so if you depending on this for connectivity
this is a problem. You stated that TCP/IP is working but not Netbios. How
did you determine this?
If you modify the lmhosts file on the local machine with the domain
information does that make a
I assumed. I could be wrong but from the information given and the problem
he was experiencing I assumed this was the case. He stated:
Sorry for not being clear,
upgraded to 5.5 sp4
patched IIS
updated ie to 5.5 sp2 and security patches
I assumed upgraded to 5.5 sp4 meant he was
Fred, if you're new to Exchange and are unsure about what will happen or
exactly what you should do. Call PSS.
-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ESE98 ?
Dear DL Members,
What were the top ten posts, statements, or phrases of Year 2001?
Rob Garrish
Exchange Administrator
Wawa Inc.
610-558-8371
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:
Are you suffering from Multiple Personality Disorder or are you responding
to your own questions?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems Logging on to domain.
1) Check your application event logs - there will be either a 1216
event (Standard) or 1217 (Enterprise) on startup.
2) There's a counter for the Single Instance Storage Ration in
Performance Monitor under the IS performance object counters.
3) Users can be moved while logged into the
Before taking any potentially long and laborious steps (like installing a
new server and moving users over), see if running NTBackup against the
Exchange server produces the same errors. In the past, I have seen
BackupExec (not NetBackup - haven't used that product) produce this error
Ok,
I've got Enterprise.
I moved my mailbox, however there was a significant lag before I could
log back on, even after the 1007 event.
I found the counter, but I may not have enough traffic to notice the
difference. I've only got 8 users on this box at present and most of
those are on
#11 -- plan ahead
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Dear DL Members,
What were the top ten posts, statements, or phrases of
#12 - you have to 'make' the time. * manager's voice *
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
#11 -- plan ahead
-Original Message-
Where's MEC next year?
Why U no answer me?
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Dear DL Members,
What were the top ten posts,
A more cogent question:
What does the archive of the outbound message show? MS-TNEF mayhaps? (IMS
Properties:Diagnostics:Message Archiving: Maximum, will be stored in
\imcdata\out\archive)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Fix your Broke @ss Sh!t
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Dear DL Members,
What were the top ten posts, statements,
Do you use Outlook?
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Dear DL Members,
What were the top ten posts, statements, or phrases
Where is this faq?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
That one sounds familiar!! ;o)
D
If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kickboxing. -Anon
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Fix
BSD Skunks the Penguin ;o)
D
In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. -Desiderius Erasmus
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases -
Additional question:
What about moving the System Mailbox? Same procedure as moving users
mailboxes?
Thanks,
Fred
Ok,
I've got Enterprise.
I moved my mailbox, however there was a significant lag before I could
log back on, even after the 1007 event.
I found the counter, but I may not have
Thought it was I'm running IE 2.0 and Outlook 97 on Windows 3.1 and I
can't...
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 5:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Do you use Outlook?
You too?
Well, do you have a backup?
Yes, but we don't know where the tapes are.
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 5:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Thought
How do I add a disclaimer to my outgoing email
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Thought it was I'm running IE 2.0 and Outlook 97 on
You should get the enterprise version. It supports saucer separation!
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Dear DL Members,
You can only get Nimda if you have a web server, We don't have a web
server!, Now Show we how to get our mail over the web again.
As said by my manager , as he was denying my purchase order for the
new Up-Grade to NAV for exchange.
Saucer Separation...Ha! That's a good one.
Upgraded from 5.5 SP3
I checked for the static RPC ports and the dword entries for tcp/ip port
are not there. This is the info I got from the knowledge base. Is this
correct?
Also I can't remember where but isn't there somewhere on the information
store besides the recipients container, that
Also we are about to upgrade from 5.5 standard to enterprise, are there
any pitfalls that I need to know about?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Sorry to keep posting.
I just tried to logon to the machine as the local administrator, dialed
up, started the vpn, and tried to set up my profile logged on as the local
administrator. When the logon pop up came up, which I had used previously,
I entered my information. It failed, it is like it
101 - 200 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
