RE: AV! a full time job?

I like blunts, too. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I use to think it was my lazy boss. And I was told it was him, but when crap hits the

RE: AV! a full time job?

PC people have no time for blunts -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I like blunts, too. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: AV! a full time job?

WAY TO GO Jim! Anytime you can pass a GOA inspection AND be used as the standard for others, you gotta be doing something right. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925

RE: AV! a full time job?

We are not PC Mm blunts. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 5:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? PC people have no time for blunts -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka

RE: AV! a full time job?

But can he pass a Boa??? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? WAY TO GO Jim! Anytime you can pass a GOA inspection AND be used as the standard for others,

RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange

Actually, it's not recommended to backup any \exchsrvr folder while any Exchange services are running. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange

RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange

what? You mean without an Exchange Aware backup, right? -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Our defense is in the preservation of the spirit which prizes liberty as a heritage of all men, in all lands, everywhere. Destroy this spirit

RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange

Correct, I should have elaborated. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange what? You mean without an Exchange Aware backup, right? -- Drew

RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange

Wow do I feel stupid! :) Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 Cell: 817-999-7703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 5:09 PM

RE: Deleting Empty ABV's

Have you applied any of the post-SP4 hotfixes? -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting Empty ABV's I have tried logging on as the service account but that didnt work

RE: Exchange Uninstall

Look at Q259158. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Uninstall I am looking for a way to remove completely all files and all registry entrees from a failed exchange

Haiku Friday

Friday! A short week Ready for year's end parties Wishing my friends well _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:

RE: Information Store Problems???

Rerun the Performance Optimizer prior to doing anything. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 4:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Information Store Problems???

Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com

I would like to hear what you think about it and if you have had any issues with it? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ One is glad to be of service ---Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)---

RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com

Works great for what it does and if you need it to do more, you can always hire the developer of the script to customize it for you. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua

RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com

Actually I downloaded it and followed the instructions and when I access it, it will appear once then return: HTTP Error 500-12 Application Restarting PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Haiku Friday

An old year going One we will never forget Hope youngsters learn well Much tragedy, much good Some have experienced pain Some became heroes Don't think bad people will overcome the good ones Good wins in the end Bin Laden look out We're going to find you soon We won't have mercy To all our

RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com

Did you follow the prerequisite and installation instructions exactly? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:07 AM To:

RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com

According to the setup instructions, the only supported way to run the app is on a server that at least has OWA installed. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: AV! a full time job?

You'll have to catch and eat me, you wierdo... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? But can he pass a Boa??? -Original Message- From:

RE: AV! a full time job?

I was so hoping that people would just let that one lay. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

NAV for Exchange 5.5

Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

You should really look at the archives for this answer. All the rants are contained there. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Ron Grant

RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com

Try excluding global.inc from from your virus scanning. I've seen this cause intermittent problems like this in the past. Dan Ferneyhough -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

anyone know

I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ:

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original

RE: anyone know

Is this new or just newly discovered? If those 4 drives are part of a RAID 5 array with a hot spare, the hot spare light doesn't come on. Aaron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: anyone know

It can mean that. What is the Compaq Array Config utility showing? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

It will work fine for you if you learn how to use it. The rants are usually from people who don't know how to use the tool. I was pretty unhappy with my chainsaw, too, until I learned to hold by the correct end. Until then, it really did a number on me. Read the readme.txt file, and pay

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

Sybari Antigen for Exchange (www.sybari.com) is the best A/V Solution for your Exchange Server. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we

RE: anyone know

this is a year old server and the 4 drives are part of a raid 5 array -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Is this new or just newly discovered? If those 4 drives

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

PS, another good argument is that it is a good thing to have 2 AV solutions in place. NAV on the servers and desktops, Scanmail on the Exch server. Quite often, one AV program may pick up a virus that the other misses. Plus you get DATs at different times. Symantec is NOTORIOUSLY slow in posting

RE: anyone know

I notice a POST 1785 error in compaq intergration managment log on dec 12 2001 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know It can mean that. What is the Compaq Array

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

If you have Scanmail on your servers now, it makes no sense to change to Groupsucks. As Martin has told you, you got good stuff now, you're going to get rotten stuff if management keeps on keeping on. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 -

RE: anyone know

In other words, you don't know the config. How much total space does the RAID 5 volume report. I bet if it reports 36.4 then you have a RAID 5 plus hot spare. If it reports 54.6GB you have a RAID5 with a failed parity drive. Aaron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard

RE: anyone know

OK, open up the Compaq Array Management Tool. See what it says. It will also place entries in the Event Viewer. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know this is a year

RE: Attachment Problems

When did this problem start occuring? How long has the system been in production? Are you running any A/V software on the system? Are the recipients that strip the attachments the same everytime versus the one's that do not strip the attachments? -Original Message- From: Jeff

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

Kelly would agree with you on that. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December

RE: anyone know

What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and

RE: anyone know

hold on let me check -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config

RE: anyone know

What is a Compaq? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know hold on let me check -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

Yes, it is great as well. But the question isn't what should he use, it is should he use NAV instead of the Scanmail he already has. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV

RE: anyone know

smart array 431 controller, slot 3 array A with spare 34719 mb raid 5, logical drive 1 -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

Run Sybari on the Exchange Server and Sophos Antivirus on the client side. Sophos is the fastest I've seen with new updates. Probably because they are based in Europe. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange

RE: anyone know

I think you store some kind of make-up in it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What is a Compaq? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard

RE: anyone know

Then you have a RAID 5 array with a hot spare. The drive with no light on is the hot spare. A -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know smart array 431 controller,

RE: Haiku Friday

God Bless the U.S.? The most successful country? Bless Afghanistan! Freedom to express? Fire! in a crowded theatre? BLB = good? Unprecedented World co-operation From this tragedy. We thank the nations By withdrawing from thirty Year old bomb treaty. Yes sir, Mr Blunt, Should the 'good' win in

RE: anyone know

cool thanks aaron I dont know that much about compaq servers never had a problem with them yet thank god. Does anyone know any good places where they teach you how to configure a compaq server in a week long class. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: anyone know

Richard, I would suggest that you or someone else in your company look into ASE training. http://www.compaq.com/certification/na/ -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

ScanMail and Groupshield get my votes. We are actually trying to get one of our customers off of NAV 2.1 Build 56 (too old to be effective). One of the major drawbacks with this version is that in order to block a file of extension type .xxx you actually have to go into the registry and put an

RE: anyone know

http://www.compaq.com/training/cd-st.html -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know cool thanks aaron I dont know that much about compaq servers never had a problem

RE: Happy Holidays

...and what was that...turning it off on the IMS?! Is it true that they are not secure and reveal everything about the Exchange server?!! Alex A. Network Errand Boy -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 12:40 PM To: Exchange

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

Agreed. Why have hamburger when you can have a nice thick slab of roast beast. Scanmail is far more Admin friendly as comared to NAV for MSX. -- From: John Matteson Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:40 To: Exchange Discussions

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

So your solution with a few outbreaks is better than NAV? We use NAV and have had none. Not even close. I just watch the stuff get ditched into the quarantine.Sounds like I'm eating well-prepared ground beef and you're eating wormy prime rib. I've never had a crashed server, never had a

RE: AV! a full time job?

Just a thought ... isn't anti-virus part of network security? Which makes it EVERYONE's job? Might need a HMFIC to oversee/ upgrade/ promote it, but in the end it's part of every admin's job to one degree or another. John -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Haiku Friday

I don't know William... Sounds like you're unsatisfied Living here with us. Having served ten years as an Army Staff Sergeant, Proud of my country. Just one more question, Do you stand up or salute This nation's great flag? If you would like to... I'll buy you a one-way trip To third-world

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch server on? -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched

RE: Haiku Friday

No you're wrong. My encephalod scissors are working properly. And another thing: any flea-written scambot that isn't wartally fixed should be dexposed prepatically. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To:

RE: Haiku Friday

No Haiku here William was Being sarcastic As he can Be at times D Many a man's reputation would not know his character if they met on the street. -Elbert Hubbard -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:06 AM To:

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

Tom...I agree with you. Same setup, no problems. In fact, we usually know about and have .dat file updates in place, before the people across the street even find out about possible problems...they're running TrendMicro Scanmail. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Haiku Friday

What??? -Original Message- From: Bauschek, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday No you're wrong. My encephalod scissors are working properly. And another thing: any flea-written scambot that isn't

RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com

My mistake - it's global.asa that should be excluded, not global.inc. More info in Q248013. -Original Message- From: Ferneyhough, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

It was twice. And I know...twice it too many as well. Both times, there was user error on my and the helpdesk end...so I can't blame it on scanmail. If I'm forced to go with NAV, then I will just have to grin and bear it. Who knows it might turn out to be a chicken fried steak with mashed taters

RE: anyone know

Maybe the LED needs replacing... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not

RE: anyone know

It's something the Pilgrims singed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What is a Compaq? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

You're running W2K Adv. Server on a P-133??? I seriously doubt that! D Mistakes: It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange

RE: Haiku Friday

What to me looks like the SADMIND, SADMIND came out before CODERED and was also an automated trojan. Digital Island turned to Narus for billing mediation software and was able to stop the leakage. Major Linux Distributions forcasted Kansas City by 3 1/2. -Original Message- From: Blunt,

RE: anyone know

Ah yes. I remember them on the Ed Sullivan Show. The Singing Pilgrims. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know It's something the Pilgrims singed. -Original

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

Haha! no, everything is on a rack server now..mo gigage processor, and rammage! This server made all the difference in the world with my environment. I was giving scanmail a bike to run a car race back then. :) -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday,

RE: anyone know

mutter Ramming speed gentlemen, and load the fish taco torpedoes. [1] [1] Of course firing them AWAY from Andy's general direction inflicting much pain on him. [2] [2] You know, I think I'll go have Rubio's at Qualcomm Stadium later today [3] [3] Holiday Bowl today you know. -Original

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

A That, I can see... :o) D Burnout: Attitudes are contagious, mine might kill you. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

Using AVAPI and File Blocking? If not, you should be. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2.

RE: anyone know

Yep, and the Huskies are going to whoop on the Longhorn's! [1] ;o) D [1] Or so I hope they do...[2] [2] Dr. Dogg, where are you? [3] [3] He's probably suffering the BAS syndrome [4] [4] HI SHERRY!!! ;o) The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

Then the people across the street don't know WTF they are doing. That is the only answer. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Tom...I agree with

RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com

Perfect works great now I appreciate the help Another question then. Do you know where the code is to change the way this thing looks? As much as I like Yellow it kind of clashes with, well everything. PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: anyone know

Go Huskies!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Yep, and the Huskies are going to whoop on the Longhorn's! [1] ;o) D [1] Or so I hope they do...[2] [2] Dr. Dogg, where

RE: anyone know

I'm rootin' for the Longhorns myself, not that I really care being a native So Cal boy. I just like Major and Texas in general. I also spent one year in Washington (Ellensburg) and froze my ass off the whole time so I generally have negative memories. But the tickets, food, and beer are all free

AVAPI Scanning question.

Exchange 5.5. We recently upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in AVAPI as well as MAPI mode. I'm a little confused on how the AVAPI works when it comes to cleaning and notifications. I know that you lose the sender and recipient information and I'm wondering why that is the case? Is it

RE: anyone know

Well, Ellensburg is in the mountains. Of course you'll freeze your hiney off! ;o) I do like Major Applewhite as well though, too bad he's playin the Dawgs today... ;o) D There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - Ed Crowley -Original Message- From: Doug

RE: anyone know

As a side note, I'm fixin to move to NC which will be considerably warmer though. ;o) D There is nothing to fear but fear itself. -Franklin D. Roosevelt -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

I am using that, and got file blocking really tricked out with Don Ely's list of attachments to block! Thanks for everyone's input. I will try to talk then into keeping scanmail, and using NAV for servers and clients as a compromise. If they don't go for it, I will hope for a trouble free system

RE: CRC errors

are you also taking CRC errors on the serial int of your router out to the ISP? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: CRC errors I have been seeing CRC errors on my Exchange Server

RE: Deleting Empty ABV's

Check out Q282184 and Q248398. Do a search on the MS exchange admin newsgroups, I believe the problem has been discussed there with an appropriate fix. (I ran into a similar situation once... I'd describe the fix, but I'm not 100% sure and I'd rather not give you wrong information. I believe it

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

Sorry bud, but you're likely to make Martin mad since it's his list. Though everyone's should look about the same with varying differences here and there. D Saving the world from Brick Level Backups and PST's - Ed Crowley -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Restoration Solutions?

Hi, Running Exchange 5.5 SP3 on NT server. We backup the server nightly using client agent from InnoculateIT. Unfortunately one of our users has misplaced or lost a large amount of mail and it is nowhere to be found. We are curious what restoration options are available with Exchange as we

X.400 headache

I am trying to get an X.400 connection working between a server in a Exchange 5.5 Org and a Exchange 2000 server in an AD domain - all test environment. I am certain I have something misconfigured as I have the logging turn all the way up and see connection refused. I have tried matching

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

I agree that Antigen is better than NAV for Exchange, we have not had any problems with it for over a year. This is also a test because as of yet I have been unable to post a question _ List posting FAQ:

Client Access Problem

I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 server from IE 3.01 to 5.5 Sp2. I don't really understand this but clients are able to connect internally (including VPN) and through OWA. However when I try to connect through the internet, it is failing with Unable to open your default email folders. The

Client Connectivity

I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 standard server from IE 4.01 to 5.5 sp2 and got up to date on patches. I am not sure this is the cause, but now internally clients connect fine (including the VPN), owa works fine. However, when connecting over the internet, I get an error Unable to open your

Client Access

I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 standard server from IE 4.01 to 5.5 sp2 and got up to date on patches. I am not sure this is the cause, but now internally clients connect fine (including the VPN), owa works fine. However, when connecting over the internet, I get an error Unable to open your

RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com

I haven't played with changing the colors myself but the color scheme is set in Global.inc. Dan Ferneyhough -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on

RE: Client Connectivity

U... You're trying to access your exchange server from the internet You DO realize how unsecure that is right??? Why would you even attempt such a thing with VPN and OWA in place D Success usually comes to those who are too busy to be looking for it. -Henry David Thoreau

RE: Client Access

How many times are you going to send this Changing the subject line will not garner different responses... D Hazards: There is an Island of Opportunity in the middle of every difficulty, miss that, though, and you're pretty much doomed. - http://www.despair.com -Original Message-

Help Connectivity Issue

I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 standard server from IE 4.01 to 5.5 sp2 and got up to date on patches. I am not sure this is the cause, but now internally clients connect fine (including the VPN), owa works fine. However when connecting over the internet, I get an error Unable to open your

RE: Restoration Solutions?

Alright, so what is the good backup solution for the Exchange databases? We have not performed test restores to date. We like to make sure everything goes to hell if the server crashes - okay, well not really. Do you have any recommendations for restore procedures (testing purposes?). Thanks,

RE: Client Access Problem

For the love of god Stop sending the same friggin message with a different subject! D Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. -Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:26 AM To:

RE: Client Access Problem

LOL After seeing the fourth post, I just knew steam was starting to come out of your ears! Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Client

RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

We ain't huggin! ;o) How about a secret handshake or something? D Incompetence: When you Earnestly Believe you can compensate for a lack of skill by doubling your efforts, there's no end to what you can't do. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone

  1   2   3   >