RE: Mail list Archives??

2001-08-20 Thread Durkee, Peter
What? No Pocket Fisherman?? -Peter -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 9:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail list Archives?? And a free set of knives -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[

RE: Somebody please verify Q264557 for me (multiple internet dom ains on single 5.5 server)

2001-08-21 Thread Durkee, Peter
It works. -Peter -Original Message- From: Tom Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Somebody please verify Q264557 for me (multiple internet domains on single 5.5 server) I want to have two different internet domain name

RE: Sharing contact files

2001-08-21 Thread Durkee, Peter
Giving the Editor role to Default should do the trick. -Peter -Original Message- From: Vicki Ewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 14:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files Well what SHOULD I put in? Is there some place other than th

RE: Sharing contact files

2001-08-22 Thread Durkee, Peter
AHA! Publishing Editor just allows you to edit Contacts that you own. You want just plain Editor. -Peter -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 13:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files And does that res

RE: Sharing contact files

2001-08-22 Thread Durkee, Peter
about that? I thought the only difference was that publishing editor could create subfolders. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing

RE: Sharing contact files

2001-08-22 Thread Durkee, Peter
ult.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net Beat him out of recognizable shape! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subje

RE: Sharing contact files

2001-08-22 Thread Durkee, Peter
Sure about that? I thought the only difference was that publishing editor could create subfolders. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing co

RE: Outage

2001-08-22 Thread Durkee, Peter
I can't, but then, Capital Hill is in the way. -Peter -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 16:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outage Nice big Power Outage in downtown Bellevue, Wa. Any other Seattle goers see it??

RE: Sharing contact files

2001-08-22 Thread Durkee, Peter
ns Subject: RE: Sharing contact files Sure about that? I thought the only difference was that publishing editor could create subfolders. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:25 PM To

RE: Message Filtering Q

2001-08-27 Thread Durkee, Peter
There's something fishy about those addresses... But, to answer the question, you should only need @relayerone.com, not the subdomains. -Peter -Original Message- From: Bollhofer, Mary I. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 14:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Me

RE: Plain Text Only

2001-08-28 Thread Durkee, Peter
Just out of curiosity, how is Internet Explorer doing on this machine? -Peter -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:32 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Plain Text Only You have a motherboard that

RE: Plain Text Only

2001-08-28 Thread Durkee, Peter
Well here's the only way I've come up with to accomplish your all text goal, at least for messages coming from the outside world. Give your attorney a new internet address, and a bigfoot.com account pointing to that address, then put the old smtp address on a different mailbox and have that mai

RE: Blocking a domain

2001-08-29 Thread Durkee, Peter
...unless the domain you're blocking is either yahoo or hotmail. -Peter -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 15:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a domain It probably won't help much, either. Ed Crowley MCSE+

RE: inbound message crashed IMC and Information Store

2001-09-07 Thread Durkee, Peter
I had the same thing happen last week, and as in your case, rebooting fixed it and it's been fine ever since. I haven't called PSS yet as I'm of the opinion that it takes two incidents to make a trend, but if you do I'd be curious to hear what they say. -Peter -Original Message- From

RE: O.O.O annoyances

2001-09-10 Thread Durkee, Peter
As long as we're on the topic, I have a question. If I've subscribed my Exchange mailbox to this, or any, list, and I turn on the OOOA, do the auto-replies go to the list itself, or do they go directly to the individuals who sent the messages? My suspicion is that Exchange based OOO replies wil

RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time...

2001-09-10 Thread Durkee, Peter
I'd think that the Hotmail User Groups scheme would only help if you could convince everyone to send separate messages to each of the Hotmail groups. The answer, as has been suggested below, is that hotmail users will have to get their messages from a regular Exchange account. It doesn't have

RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time...

2001-09-10 Thread Durkee, Peter
I just realized you could also set up custom recipients (or the Exchange 2K equivalent) for the Hotmail students, and put those addresses in the All Students list. -Peter -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 14:55 To

RE: Can you belive this crap?

2001-09-11 Thread Durkee, Peter
Hmm, I guess we can rule out the spoofing theory. Peter > -- > From: John Allhiser > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:50 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Can you belive this crap? > > Uh, go to the

RE: Mac Outlook 2001

2001-09-13 Thread Durkee, Peter
I agree. I use both myself under 5.5 and sp4, and don't have any problems. I'm careful though not to touch any rules from the Mac side, as Outlook 2001 looks like it has the old Inbox Assistant. -Peter -Original Message- From: Beavers, Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,

RE: New Virus / Worm ??

2001-09-18 Thread Durkee, Peter
They are mentioned in the NAI website. I've also seen mention of WAV and COM files. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ?? has anybody seen anything

RE: Can't delete some emails

2001-10-01 Thread Durkee, Peter
I ran into that recently, and was able to Exmerge them out. -Peter -Original Message- From: Cook, David A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can't delete some emails I have three messages in my administrator mailbox that

RE: Sircam Virus

2001-10-01 Thread Durkee, Peter
We're still getting all three, Sircam, Magistr, and Hybris. Interestingly, all three of them show up in the notifications I get from Antigen as having either unknown or spoofed senders. Because of this, Antigen isn't able to send out its alerts to the people who are sending the messages, so, th

RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source

2001-10-01 Thread Durkee, Peter
I did the same thing once. Knocked the Coke over on something sharp, which shock it up for maximum fizz action and sent it rolling across the desk spraying everything in it's path. It was memorable. On the flowgo part of the thread, try entering @FLOWGO.COM. -Peter -Original Message-

RE: scanmail blocked macintosh file attachment

2001-10-01 Thread Durkee, Peter
Are you blocking .bin files? Macs sometimes add that extension when using binhex encoding. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 20:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: scanmail blocked macintosh file attachment

RE: Virus anyone?

2001-10-02 Thread Durkee, Peter
We've had Magistr try to send us start.exe attachments. The message body seems a bit too coherent for Magistr, but maybe it just got lucky this time. -Peter -Original Message- From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:02 To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Notification Inbound Mail

2001-10-02 Thread Durkee, Peter
The best technique that I've found is to add the addresses for the former employees to a DL which has no members. When you do that, incoming messages are received but then vanish, with no NDRs going out. I only do this for people who've been gone for over a year, but are still receiving junk.

RE: Notification Inbound Mail

2001-10-02 Thread Durkee, Peter
ssage- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail The best technique that I've found is to add the addresses for the former employees to a DL which has

RE: ScanMail 3.52 AVAPI & MAPI mode.

2001-12-14 Thread Durkee, Peter
I don't think that's Trend, or even AV, related. We have that problem intermittently too, and we don't have ScanMail at all. Also, I don't think I've ever seen it on messages with attachments. -Peter -Original Message- From: Phillip Yan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, Decembe

RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit

2001-12-18 Thread Durkee, Peter
I think the AOL limit is around 5MB. -Peter -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 14:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit How much space is available at the aol address for e-mails

RE: Possible Trojan.

2001-12-26 Thread Durkee, Peter
It sounds like Magistr to me. It sends out messages whose subjects are taken from bits of text found in documents on the infected PC. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 10:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: R

RE: Uninstall Groupshield (was Haiku Friday)

2001-12-26 Thread Durkee, Peter
Run the Groupshield install, and choose the uninstall option. The message body scanner can be removed using the add/remove software control panel. After that's all done you can remove the Admin DLLs that infest Exchange Admin using the technique in section 3.70 of the FAQ. -Peter -Origin

RE: Groupshield and Exch 5.5 sp4

2002-01-02 Thread Durkee, Peter
Hotfix 7 to be exact. Also, when you're asked if you want to quarantine infected files in a folder or a database, choose database, or else the resolve names utility won't work. It may be included by now, but if it isn't, make sure to get the Message Body Scanning Utility from their website, as

RE: Groupshield and Exch 5.5 sp4

2002-01-02 Thread Durkee, Peter
Probably not...I never tried putting hotfix 7 on a machine that didn't already have 5. Get the Message Body Scanner, hotfix 5 comes with it. -Peter -Original Message- From: Kim Kruse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 15:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE

RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think

2002-01-04 Thread Durkee, Peter
There's an add-on product called NaiL MaTe that solves this problem. It works similarly to those ice cream scoop mechanisms that shove the ice cream off the scoop. -Peter -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:52 To: Excha

RE: Built-in filter criteria for junk email (O2002)

2002-01-09 Thread Durkee, Peter
I think that under Outlook 98 editing filters.txt may have changed the filter, but by the time 2000 rolled around that was no longer the case. -Peter -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subj

RE: Built-in filter criteria for junk email (O2002)

2002-01-09 Thread Durkee, Peter
as Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 13:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Built-in filter criteria for junk email (O2002) You could never edit filters.txt. Tom. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wedn

RE: Exchange Crash

2002-01-09 Thread Durkee, Peter
I ran into a similar situation once, where I had to recreate an Exchange server but was told the wrong site and org names. I set up the server using the names I thought were correct, and, needless to say, it failed when the original edb files were placed on the server. However, I was able to fi

RE: Solicitation

2002-01-09 Thread Durkee, Peter
Are you allowing anonymous LDAP access? -Peter -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 14:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Solicitation Hi On a system that is Exchange 5.5 sp4hot and 2k sp2hot, and also relay secure, is t

RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus

2002-01-11 Thread Durkee, Peter
I'm in downtown Seattle, and I trust you'll be seeing Lord of the Rings at the Cinerama. -Peter -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@m

RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus

2002-01-11 Thread Durkee, Peter
Well...I'm actually in the Tri-Cities (3.5 hours across the state in the SE corner) so I'll be going to the new Carmike 12-plex in Kennewick. Jim -Original Message----- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions S

RE: Locking down default location for saving attachment in mail

2002-01-14 Thread Durkee, Peter
Here's an add-on Outlook utility that allows you to set the path. http://www.swinc.com/products/outlookdefpath.htm -Peter -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 13:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Locking down default

RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus

2002-01-15 Thread Durkee, Peter
, 2002 8:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus I'm about to go see LOTR at the Cinerama - 4:00 showing tonight. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:57 PM To: Exc

RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus

2002-01-15 Thread Durkee, Peter
Thursday. Tonight was going to be a second viewing, but the friend who was going to see it with me bailed. I might skip tonight. No fun watching the same movie twice - alone. Darcy -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:42 AM To

RE: PAB or Contacts

2001-10-19 Thread Durkee, Peter
Three minor reasons for sticking with the PAB. 1. While Contacts now supports PDLs, they have a fairly low size limit (I don't remember what it is though). PAB PDLs can be bigger. 2. Display names from Contacts have that irritating (E-mail) tacked on, to distinguish them from other things, lik

RE: Contacts list

2001-10-22 Thread Durkee, Peter
How about LDAP? -Peter -Original Message- From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 13:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Contacts list Good day.. I have a user who connects to our server from home VIA pop3 (this user is never in the office).

RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?

2001-10-24 Thread Durkee, Peter
Come on fess up, what's the biggest? Biggest IS here is 41GB, mailbox is 1.4GB. -Peter -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 14:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? 39/30=1.3 gig a

RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?

2001-10-24 Thread Durkee, Peter
t the size of your store, it’s what you do with it that counts.” William Lefkovics, April 14, 2000 -Original Message----- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Come

RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?

2001-10-24 Thread Durkee, Peter
I'm amazed that, having spent much time on this list, your spelling sensors are still working well enough to detect that. Mine, I'm afraid, are shot. -Peter -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 14:51 To: Exchange Discu

RE: Report on Outlook Rules (Server side) from Exchange Server 5. 5

2001-10-25 Thread Durkee, Peter
Or, if your users have roaming profiles, do searches through the directories containing the profile info for any RWZ files containing the text, hotmail.com or yahoo.com. -Peter -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:33 To: Exchan

RE: List of Client version

2001-10-29 Thread Durkee, Peter
http://www.cdolive.com/build.htm -Peter -Original Message- From: Calvin Cheng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: List of Client version How do I know what version of Outlook my users are running using the list of Exchange/

RE: Groupshield For Exchange Version 4.5

2001-10-30 Thread Durkee, Peter
If you are currently using the client piece of Groupshield you should remove your old version of Groupshield entirely and install the new from scratch, rather than trying to upgrade to the new version. Grab the Message Body Scanner utility from the NAI website, and install it after you get Gr

RE: Hotfixes for Exchange 5.5

2001-10-30 Thread Durkee, Peter
I don't know if this is something you can absolutely count on, but all the hotfixes I've seen put a folder, with the folder name being the number of the hotfix, in the exchsrvr folder. -Peter -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30

RE: Groupshield For Exchange Version 4.5

2001-10-30 Thread Durkee, Peter
gt; Just want to say thanks to those for the information. > > Didy > > > -Original Message- > > From: Durkee, Peter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:01 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject:RE: Groupshield F

RE: Blank emails

2001-11-01 Thread Durkee, Peter
...or the other way around, as plain-text is the one format where the reader gets to pick the color, and he or she may have made a bad choice. I you click-drag across the blankness do the letters appear in the highlighted area? -Peter -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: OL2K - contacts..freakin Fax number area code added thing

2001-11-09 Thread Durkee, Peter
Grammatical AND technical advice dispensed simultaneously ... very impressive. -Peter -Original Message- From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 13:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL2K - contacts..freakin Fax number area code added thing o

RE: No Originator

2001-11-15 Thread Durkee, Peter
Exchange sent them. They're NDRs. -Peter -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No Originator Ok when I am looking at the Queues for my IMC on my mail servers I see a few e-mails waiti

RE: Does anyone know how to Add Holidays to ALL Calendars without use r intervention

2001-11-15 Thread Durkee, Peter
Exmerge can be used for this. -Peter -Original Message- From: Thomas Prohigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Does anyone know how to Add Holidays to ALL Calendars without use r intervention Does anyone know how to Add

RE: Resetting the Mailto Application in Outlook!

2001-11-19 Thread Durkee, Peter
I think that's under Internet Explorer, Tools->Internet options->Programs. -Peter -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resetting the Mailto Application in Outlook! Does anyone kno

RE: Newbie question so please don 't bash me..

2001-11-19 Thread Durkee, Peter
I was under the impression that setting up a CR as an alternate recipient is quite safe, because the message, as relayed, appears to be from the original sender, not the address it's relayed from. Because of this, any *mailbox is full*, or *user doesn't exist* messages go directly back to the o

RE: IMC - no inbound mail

2001-11-21 Thread Durkee, Peter
Have you set your own domain as inbound under the IMC Routing tab? Are people who try to send to you getting NDRs, and if so, what do they say? -Peter -Original Message- From: Andy Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subj

RE: Exchange Problem

2001-11-27 Thread Durkee, Peter
Just alt tab out of sp4 setup, rename msesperf.ini to msesperf.old, go back to the setup, and click try again, or whatever that button is named. -Peter -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:57 To: Exchange

RE: partially off-topic - virus' travelling via html e-mails

2001-11-27 Thread Durkee, Peter
There have been several viruses that have tried to update themselves from internet addresses, both websites and newsgroups. There have also been a few that have travelled in the HTML formatting of e-mails, notably the kak worm. I don't think there have been any that did both, however. What do

RE: partially off-topic - virus' travelling via html e-mails

2001-11-28 Thread Durkee, Peter
I don't think that converting all your outgoing messages to HTML will increase the chances of a virus outbreak. I'm guessing that 95% of the messages we send are HTML as it is, since all the rich text messages are converted to HTML on sending to the Internet. Furthermore, because of Kak, all th

RE: New Groupshield install.

2001-12-03 Thread Durkee, Peter
You can also do what I used to do when we were on Groupshield, which is look through the imcdata\in\archive directory and look at the files that came in at the time the virus alert was sent by Groupshield. This, needless to say, assumes that you have message archiving turned on. -Peter -

RE: Exchange 5.5 AVAPI (Anti-Virus interface)

2001-12-04 Thread Durkee, Peter
I know Groupshield can suffer from this problem, though we were able to minimize it through the timing changes in the registry. I'm don't know if it's true with other AVAPI scanners though. Did you write Mac shareware in years past? -Peter -Original Message- From: Loftus Greig [mailt

RE: New Virus outbreak

2001-12-04 Thread Durkee, Peter
I think the double extension are just meant to throw off humans (with some help from Windows), not filters. -Peter -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak I don't

RE: New Virus outbreak - listen to this

2001-12-04 Thread Durkee, Peter
Since you have Antigen, add gone.scr to your file filter, and set it to purge and not notify. -Peter -Original Message- From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 14:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak - listen to this This

RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on

2002-01-15 Thread Durkee, Peter
Q150095 perhaps? -Peter -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Mr. Lefkovics / Dr. Dogg, When I send an e-mail to a

RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on

2002-01-15 Thread Durkee, Peter
Maybe there's a replication issue. Is the DL on the same server as your IMC? Also, if you think the problem is caused by the lack of list members, you could always make yourself a member, and then see if you still get the NDR. -Peter -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mail

RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on

2002-01-15 Thread Durkee, Peter
High Physical Memory Utilizati on Peter, Thanks for the "Q" article. You were right on. Evidently, it WAS a replication issue. I thought I gave it enough time to replicate, but I guess not. It's working like a charm now. Thanks for everyone's help! Jim -Original Message

RE: Forward's for ex-employees problem

2002-01-18 Thread Durkee, Peter
Or setup hidden mailboxes for each ex-employee, and make the boss the alternate recipient in each. -Peter -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forward's for ex-employees problem Rules

RE: Unable to get to Resource calendar

2002-01-18 Thread Durkee, Peter
You could export the whole calendar to a CSV, clear it out with Exmerge, OWA, or an old Exchange client, and then import the CSV. This will convert all the reoccurring appointments into separate appointments extending some distance into the future, thereby fixing the problem if it is being caus

RE: Multiple Identities

2002-01-18 Thread Durkee, Peter
The only way I've found to accomplish this is to make a separate mailbox for each address you want to send from. Since you probably don't want these extra identities littering up your GAL, you can put them in your Contacts folder, and then hide them. This allows you to enter the alternate addre

RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations

2002-01-24 Thread Durkee, Peter
...and they do have the funniest radio ads. I sympathize on your situation with NAI. We saw a similar price increase from them while actually reducing the number of nodes. I looked at it as a good excuse to get some good software, Antigen in our case. -Peter -Original Message- From:

RE: How do you send a recurring message

2002-01-25 Thread Durkee, Peter
I was going to make the same suggestion Chris did, but since he's already made it, I'll just add that I'd do anything to avoid becoming the firmwide Alarm Clock Administrator. -Peter -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 9:26

RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations

2002-01-25 Thread Durkee, Peter
Don't get me wrong. I had made my peace with Groupshield's eccentricities, and probably would have stuck with it if they had not tried tripling the amount we were paying at the exact same time as I was trying (in vain) for months to get a fix from NAI tech support that would allow Groupshield t

RE: Alert: W32/Myparty-mm on the loose

2002-01-28 Thread Durkee, Peter
My *.com filter has been working too, but I don't do any file filtering in the SMTP scanner, just the Realtime scanner. -Peter -Original Message- From: Robert T. Echols [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Alert: W32/Myp

RE: IMSext / Mail Relaying

2002-01-30 Thread Durkee, Peter
What you need to do is use the registry method of setting up imsext.dll, as opposed to the field at the bottom of the IMS routing tab. Then, use the preferred method of stopping open relaying contained in that article, which is going into Routing Restrictions and checking Hosts and clients with

RE: Mac - Ex 5.5 mailbox move issue

2002-01-31 Thread Durkee, Peter
Do the Mac clients have hosts files that need to be changed to reflect a new IP address? -Peter -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mac - Ex 5.5 mailbox move issue Do your Mac clie

RE: Autoforwarding Rules.

2002-02-04 Thread Durkee, Peter
Or have the one rule both forward the message to the other user, and move it to the folder. -Peter -Original Message- From: Gary Aiston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 13:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Autoforwarding Rules. why not use the 1st rul

RE: Supporting Outlook as an Exchange Admin - Poll

2002-02-05 Thread Durkee, Peter
That's how it works the first time a user calls. From then on they call the admin directly. -Peter -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Supporting Outlook as an Exchange Admin

RE: email messages slow to open?

2002-02-07 Thread Durkee, Peter
We're using Outlook 2000 so your mileage may vary. I've noticed here that the file \Documents and Settings\\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\outcmd.dat, which starts out life at around 5k in size, can work itself up to 1MB and beyond, causing messages to open extremely slowly. It'll be recrea

RE: Contact List

2002-02-07 Thread Durkee, Peter
You can't easily get them in the global address list, but if they're in a public folder everyone can use that Contacts folder as an Outlook Address Book. Laptop users can even use them offline if the public contacts folder is first put in favorites. -Peter -Original Message- From: Jus

RE: Recover Deleted items .... Missing presumed dead !

2002-02-12 Thread Durkee, Peter
I think the option to recover deleted items was only added with Outlook 98. -Peter -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 8:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recover Deleted items Missing presumed dead ! All I have post

RE: Exchange and Mac client

2002-02-20 Thread Durkee, Peter
It sounds to me like maybe the Mac is running into routing restrictions, because if it was the hosts file thing it wouldn't be able to connect to Exchange at all. Maybe it just needs its ip address added to the addresses that can relay screen. Peter -Original Message- Fro

RE: Exchange and Mac client

2002-02-20 Thread Durkee, Peter
Which Mac client are you using? Peter -Original Message- From: Julian Risnoveanu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 14:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and Mac client First this is how I set up this client: I used the IP address

RE: Some of the mails don't reach external world

2002-02-20 Thread Durkee, Peter
Does the presence or absence of attachments have any effect on whether or not the messages get out? Peter -Original Message- From: Masthanaiah Cheekavolu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 11:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Some of the m

RE: Forward mail already in mailbox?

2002-02-20 Thread Durkee, Peter
Just make a rule to forward all messages to the POP account, and then run the rule for all existing messages. Peter -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 14:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forward

RE: Exchange and Mac client

2002-02-20 Thread Durkee, Peter
PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 14:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and Mac client Mac OS 9.2 -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and Mac

RE: Exchange and Mac client

2002-02-20 Thread Durkee, Peter
esday, February 20, 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and Mac client Entourage. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and Mac client I meant wh

RE: Forward mail already in mailbox?

2002-02-20 Thread Durkee, Peter
r keep the original sender intact. Thanks, Fred -Original Message----- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forward mail already in mailbox? Just make a rule to forward all messages to the POP account, an

RE: Exchange and Mac client

2002-02-20 Thread Durkee, Peter
Messaging > -- > From: Durkee, Peter > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 4:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange and Mac client > > In that case, I'm sticking to the routing restriction

RE: testing relay

2002-03-04 Thread Durkee, Peter
And, of course, servers that don't exist except in the fertile imagination of some spammer are unlikely to accept any NDRs. Peter -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: testi

RE: changed display NAME AND

2002-03-04 Thread Durkee, Peter
Is she on the same server you are? It may just be replication delay. Peter -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: changed display NAME AND Good afternoon, Outlook 98 NT 5.5 SP

RE: AV v. IMS question

2002-03-04 Thread Durkee, Peter
I don't think you'd ever see viruses being missed due to overload from purely external virus messages. You really need one or two people to open it internally and send it off to the entire GAL to achieve that level of saturation. I saw it happen a couple of times under the old MAPI Groupshield.

RE: Cannot resolve recipient name or address

2002-03-07 Thread Durkee, Peter
Maybe all your address books were somehow removed from the search order under Address Book -> Tools -> Options. -Peter -Original Message- From: Justin Lape [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 13:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cannot resolve recipient name or

RE: Is anyone getting this?

2002-03-08 Thread Durkee, Peter
Why you no answer my question!!! -Peter -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 14:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is anyone getting this? What? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Is anyone getting this?

2002-03-08 Thread Durkee, Peter
Excuse me, I meant "???" -Peter -Original Message----- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 14:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is anyone getting this? Why you no answer my question!!! -Peter -Original Message- Fr

RE: attachment size limits

2002-03-11 Thread Durkee, Peter
Size limits can be set at the IMC's General tab, and also at the MTA's General tab. In both cases the limit is for the whole message, and in the case of the IMC that means after encoding, which adds maybe 30% to the size of the attachment. -Peter -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter

RE: Spam Filtering

2002-03-12 Thread Durkee, Peter
You might try leaving out the "lists" part. -Peter -Original Message- From: Exchange Newsgroups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spam Filtering I have added several domains under Message Delivery, Filters, to filter out em

  1   2   3   4   >