--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5
dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
snip
someone like Spairegg who does not meditate
Where did you get the idea that Sparaig doesn't
meditate? From Barry, perhaps?
As I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
snip
Name a single incident where they actually fired a weapon
rather than locked their radar on.
Oh, gee, Lawson, they fired at the planes all the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Turq, this is extremely wonderful, brilliant. In natural law, God
blesses in democracy those bills of rights.
On Jefferson's tomb at Monticello in the inscription,
it mentions that he was most proud of his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TorquoiseB writes snipped:
Everyone I've ever met who seemed to be enlightened or
seemed close to it was,
above all, comfortable being themselves. Some people
think that this is an
Yoga-suutra mentions several stages of samaadhi.
The main distinction seems to be sabiija- vs.
nirbiija-samaadhi. The highest stage is, I guess,
dharma-megha-samaadhi.
I wonder what stage typically(?) is the one mentioned
in Vibhuuti-paada (third book). It's hardly nirbiija,
because of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lagaan: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/lagaan/
Check it out. You'll love it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagaan
I agree. Especially if you haven't been acquainted with Bollywood
movies, this is one of the best
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another movie which maybe a good start is Dil Se
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dil_Se, the director Mani Ratnam, manages
to make a good compromise between artistic and commercial films.
And before I forget: Main actress
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoga-suutra mentions several stages of samaadhi.
The main distinction seems to be sabiija- vs.
nirbiija-samaadhi. The highest stage is, I guess,
dharma-megha-samaadhi.
I wonder what stage typically(?) is the one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip Sacrifice gains spiritual favor and ascendancy in divinity.
The Ribhus gained immortality through their zealous
sacrificing (Rig 1.110.4).
TorquoiseB writes snipped:
It seems to me that being uncomfortable with oneself
spiritually seems to go hand-in-hand with the
tendency to become a spiritual fascist. The more
rules one imposes on onesself, the more you feel
comfortable imposing on others. The less tolerant
you are of your own
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TurquoiseB writes snipped:
It seems to me that being uncomfortable with oneself
spiritually seems to go hand-in-hand with the
tendency to become a spiritual fascist. The more
rules one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
Yoga-suutra mentions several stages of samaadhi.
The main distinction seems to be sabiija- vs.
nirbiija-samaadhi. The highest stage is, I guess,
On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:28 AM, cardemaister wrote:
Yoga-suutra mentions several stages of samaadhi.
The main distinction seems to be sabiija- vs.
nirbiija-samaadhi. The highest stage is, I guess,
dharma-megha-samaadhi.
I wonder what stage typically(?) is the one mentioned
in Vibhuuti-paada
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
Yoga-suutra mentions several stages of samaadhi.
The main distinction seems
Was Gautama Shaakyamuni a Shaka (HK = zaka):
(Only recently I learned that he was not shakyamuni,
but shaakyamuni, which, in this case, makes a
huge difference, I believe...)
zaka3 m. pl. N. of a partic. whiteskinned tribe or race of people
(in the legends which relate the contests between
Yep, a descendent of the Nepalese Shakya clan. Subsequent and
previous Buddhas were however from completely different clans. As we
speak different Himalayan yogins are consciously incarnating into the
west. The first acknowledged was to a Spanish Buddhist couple, but
even a Native American
TorquiseB wrties snipped:
They also assume that states of consciousness
will continue to change and fluctuate, even
after enlightenment is stable. One day you'll
be experiencing stage one samadhi, and next
something else. Your state of consciousness will
continue to fluctuate as long as you have a
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
dhamiltony2k5
dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
snip
someone like Spairegg who does not meditate
Where did you get the idea that Sparaig
snip
Feste37, whoever you are, I appreciate that you are
still around FFL
defending the *faith* as best you can. I understand
you are quite a
babe. But tell us your thoughts really.
Now, what do you think about the disappeared ?
The *disappeared*.
You know, all those TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
snip
Name a single incident where they actually fired a weapon
rather than locked their
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
these folks have been in the mindset
of believing that there is something essentially
WRONG with them for so long that they get angry
when someone suggests that there is nothing wrong
with them, and that they might
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
dhamiltony2k5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
someone like Spairegg who does not meditate
Where did you get the idea that Sparaig doesn't
meditate? From Barry, perhaps?
As I understand it, he does
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
One of the things that has come out of the 12 step
journey, for me, is the understanding that most of
the time whatever the purported other accuse me
of doing or having or whatever the issue,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
dhamiltony2k5
dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
snip
someone like Spairegg who does not meditate
Where did you get the idea that Sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Janet Luise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Two of the co-authors would be know to at least some of you.
Tom Hickey was a philosophy professor at MIU in the early 80's
Kendra Crossen Burroughs is Jonathan's wife
I know Kendra in a completely different
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
dhamiltony2k5
dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
snip
someone like Spairegg who does not meditate
Where did you get the idea that Sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip
these folks have been in the mindset
of believing that there is something essentially
WRONG with them for so long that they get angry
when
On Jan 4, 2007, at 3:52 PM, sparaig wrote:
It's merely an analogy. Early MIU textbooks on physics (which were
self-published) detailed these analogies but then in a responsible
fashion gave a concluding chapter which stated these were just
analogies and 'you can only take analogies so far.'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip
these folks have been in the mindset
of believing that there is something
In a message dated 1/4/07 8:51:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Name a single incident where they actually fired a weapon rather than locked
their radar
on.
I'll give you several in a single three month period in 1999 just in the
northern no fly zone. If you'll
In a message dated 1/4/07 8:51:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Name a single incident where they actually fired a weapon rather than locked
their radar
on. that is STILL not the same as firing on
American forces. He was, IIRC, very careful to NEVER do that.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Take a DP breath, Barry, and relax. Then try
to reread what I wrote *calmly*. If you see a
problem with my paraphrase of what you wrote that
I quoted, explain what I got wrong. That you're
fascinated by the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TorquiseB wrties snipped:
They also assume that states of consciousness
will continue to change and fluctuate, even
after enlightenment is stable. One day you'll
be experiencing stage one
On Jan 4, 2007, at 3:52 PM, sparaig wrote:
It's merely an analogy. Early MIU textbooks on physics (which were
self-published) detailed these analogies but then in a responsible
fashion gave a concluding chapter which stated these were just
analogies and 'you can only take analogies so far.'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
Take a DP breath, Barry, and relax. Then try
to reread what I wrote *calmly*. If you see a
problem with my paraphrase of what you wrote that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/4/07 8:51:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Name a single incident where they actually fired a weapon rather
than locked
their radar
on.
I'll give you several in a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
MDixon's absolutely right on this, Lawson. I don't
know where the idea that the Iraqis never fired on
U.S. planes got started, but it's just wrong, unless
the military is blatantly lying.
Just a few examples from
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just as fodder for discussion, if anyone's on that
wavelength, it seems to me that the Vedic/Hindu
approach to these different types of samadhi
interprets them as stages because they're stuck
in a hierarchical
Judy writes:
So when you claim the criticisms of others are
their own deepest, darkest, denied secrets, that
must mean what you're accusing them of is *your*
deepest, darkest, denied secret, right?
Does the 12-step journey provide any insight into
how to spot and deal with infinite regresses?
Tom T snipped
Attention comes and goes on some schedule and where it
stops nobody knows to quote the carney who spins the
wheel of fortune. Tom
TorquiseB writes snipped:
And every number is a winner, if you're just weird
enough to see it that way. :-)
Tom T:
Eggzactly, Get your numbers get
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
Just as fodder for discussion, if anyone's on that
wavelength, it seems to me that the Vedic/Hindu
approach to these different types of samadhi
Judy writes snipped:
As well, you're quite mistaken to suggest that
I believe what a person criticizes in others is
really their own flaws. I've pointed out before
that I think this notion is a thought-stopper, a
way of deflecting criticism. It may be true in
some cases, but it's by no means a
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy writes:
So when you claim the criticisms of others are
their own deepest, darkest, denied secrets, that
must mean what you're accusing them of is *your*
deepest, darkest, denied secret,
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy writes snipped:
As well, you're quite mistaken to suggest that
I believe what a person criticizes in others is
really their own flaws. I've pointed out before
that I think this notion is a
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy writes snipped:
As well, you're quite mistaken to suggest that
I believe what a person criticizes in others is
really their own flaws. I've pointed out before
that I think this notion is a
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy writes:
So when you claim the criticisms of others are
their own deepest, darkest, denied secrets, that
must mean what you're accusing them of is *your*
deepest, darkest, denied secret,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@ wrote:
Judy writes snipped:
As well, you're quite mistaken to suggest that
I believe what a person
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
Just as fodder for discussion, if anyone's on that
wavelength, it seems
I think there is a distinction to be made here, between
making some sort of value judgment about one state of
consciousness vs. another, and recognizing the valid
attributes of each state of consciousness, and that
enjoyment grows with the attainment of each successive
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
dhamiltony2k5
dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
snip
someone like
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@ wrote:
Judy writes snipped:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:28 AM, cardemaister wrote:
Yoga-suutra mentions several stages of samaadhi.
The main distinction seems to be sabiija- vs.
nirbiija-samaadhi. The highest stage is, I guess,
dharma-megha-samaadhi.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
Yoga-suutra mentions several stages of samaadhi.
The main distinction
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 4, 2007, at 3:52 PM, sparaig wrote:
It's merely an analogy. Early MIU textbooks on physics (which were
self-published) detailed these analogies but then in a responsible
fashion gave a concluding chapter which
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/4/07 8:51:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Name a single incident where they actually fired a weapon rather than locked
their radar
on.
I'll give you several in a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
MDixon's absolutely right on this, Lawson. I don't
know where the idea that the Iraqis never fired on
U.S. planes got started, but it's just
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 1/4/07 8:51:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
sparaig@ writes:
Name a single incident where they actually fired a weapon rather
t3rinity wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lagaan: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/lagaan/
Check it out. You'll love it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagaan
I agree. Especially if you haven't been acquainted with Bollywood
On Jan 5, 2007, at 9:54 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
Dear David
Rick,
Which David is this? Orme-Johnson?
Sal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can't comment on that. I'm a Buddhist who doesn't
even believe that God exists. :-)
Really? If Buddha--Buddhism--Buddhist exists, how can God not
exist? I'd like to hear your definition of Buddha.
This progression
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wrong.
Most refreshing thing I've read here in a while.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
Can't comment on that. I'm a Buddhist who doesn't
even believe that God exists. :-)
Really? If Buddha--Buddhism--Buddhist exists, how can God
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:28 AM, cardemaister wrote:
Yoga-suutra mentions several stages of samaadhi.
The main distinction seems to be sabiija- vs.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
I was wrong.
Most refreshing thing I've read here in a while.
??? I'm wrong quite often.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
Can't comment on that. I'm a Buddhist who doesn't
even believe that God
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:28 AM, cardemaister wrote:
Yoga-suutra mentions
On Jan 5, 2007, at 1:59 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:28 AM, cardemaister wrote:
Yoga-suutra mentions several stages of samaadhi.
The main distinction seems to be sabiija- vs.
nirbiija-samaadhi. The highest
_
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Sal Sunshine
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 1:42 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Censorship vice versa authentic spiritual
evolution
On Jan 5, 2007, at 9:54 AM, Rick Archer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
[snip]
Captured in Taliban fortresses firing at United states soldiers,
with
AK47's, RPG's etc. Many of whom were Saudis with Saudi passports
or Pakistani.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 5, 2007, at 1:59 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:28 AM, cardemaister wrote:
Yoga-suutra mentions several stages of samaadhi.
The main
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer jeffcandace@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
I was wrong.
Most refreshing thing I've read here in a while.
???
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
Can't comment on that. I'm a Buddhist who doesn't
even believe that
..and what about the philosophical side of it? What are the
Vedic/Hindu concepts corresponding to traditional Chinese medical
concepts like:
Sanjiao
Pericardium
the Meridians (and the points were they surface)
Qi/Jing/Shen/Blood/Fluids (Jin/Ye)
..and more general like:
Yin/Yang
Fire, Water,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip
I would say instead that you *assumed* they were not
available to you. Therefore they weren't.
Hang on-- Broadening the discussion beyond
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 1/4/07 8:51:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
sparaig@ writes:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip Sacrifice gains spiritual favor and ascendancy in
divinity.
The Ribhus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer
jeffcandace@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@
wrote:
I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
snip
Hmmm I wonder if we needed to investigate Japanese and
German's that were captured
Are you suggesting there is a hierarchy of tits, then, that goes from
non-saggy to saggy and that non-saggy tits are somehow better than
saggy ones? Why else would you use an example where observation about
saggy tits is considered criticism? Aren't all tits equal? Or does the
non-hierarchical
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer
jeffcandace@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer
jeffcandace@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip
I would say instead that you *assumed* they were not
available to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hermandan0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you suggesting there is a hierarchy of tits, then, that goes from
non-saggy to saggy and that non-saggy tits are somehow better than
saggy ones? Why else would you use an example where observation about
saggy tits
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message
Folkie Donovan David Lynch?
by Randy Lewis Los Angeles Times 5Dec2007
An early front-runner for the 2007 Odd Couple Pairing of the Year
award has emerged with word that filmmaker David Lynch and '60s folk-
rock hero Donovan will team for three free appearances this month.
They'll make stops
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hermandan0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you suggesting there is a hierarchy of tits, then,
that goes from non-saggy to saggy and that non-saggy
tits are somehow better than saggy ones?
No, it's a purely relational model. The tits should
be proportional
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@
wrote:
I was wrong.
Judy wrote:
He does that pretty often too. Whenever he's been
convinced he's wrong, in fact.
That's great. I just don't see much of that around here.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hermandan0 no_reply@ wrote:
Are you suggesting there is a hierarchy of tits, then,
that goes from non-saggy to saggy and that non-saggy
tits are somehow better than saggy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heck, Jim, there's a bunch of chimpanzees who
have transcended this limitation and are holding
forth on this very forum.
;-)
Shucks, Bonzo, she's found us out. Time to scram.
Some people apparently don't even know what The Clerk of Jyotirmath's
family name really is. Only one person, that I know of, and I know a
lot of TMers, has actually seen The Clerks's passport, namely Tom
Anderson, a former TMO Secretary on TTC in Spain, and Tom told me that
the name on the
Any point value can awaken, at any moment, to its
infinite value, even a lowly paper-pushing clerk. Then
the relative distinctions become quite superfluous. By
the way, on my TTC as MMY reached up to be helped off
a boat he said to the person, Take little Brahman's
hand.
--- Richard J. Williams
Unless Kropinski's interview with Swami Swaroopananda Brahmananda is b.s.
(which I don't think it is), Mr. Shrivastava was a clerk, albeit a heavily
favored one. That's the karmic lot of a non-Brahmin in the Hindu religious
vocation: no women allowed ruling in the clubhouse, and most
TurquoiseB wrote:
I'm a Buddhist
Which one?
who doesn't even believe that God exists.
You've mentioned this numerous times, as if it were a badge of honer,
being an athiest, and using that to impress other respondents. But
there is no evidence that the historical Buddha was an athiest. On
sparaig wrote:
The sentience of the Whole may be so incomprensible as to be
undetectable by any of the sentient parts, so it may not matter,
but why assume that there is or isn't such a thing?
It's not at all that complicated. If you read the Yoga Sutras,
Patanjali makes it dirt simple:
The
As I recall that was Larry Domash: analogies break down if they are pushed
too far. David Clay often made the same point in regard to potentially ad hoc
arguments. But, alas, there are no philosophers left at MU (that is because
philosophy is a shear waste of time, I assume). But logically
jim_flanegin wrote:
I'd like to hear your definition of Buddha.
Which Buddha?
The historical Buddha taught causation. The Buddhist teaching on karma
is entailed in the Buddha's sermon on the 'Second Watch of the Night'
when the Gotama described his attainment of enlightenment.
In the 'First
The worship of Shri Vidya has been popular in India from very ancient
times. Swami Gaudapada, the teacher of Shankaracharya, was a worshiper
of Sri Vidya. Following his initiation Swami Shankaracharya wrote a
lucid ode to Shri Vidya, the Saundariya Lahari, a translation of which
is now available
authfriend wrote:
Heck, Jim, there's a bunch of chimpanzees who
have transcended this limitation and are holding
forth on this very forum.
It's all about Barry, isn't it?
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
