For anyone who might be interested, John Knapp now has a stage name,
Johnny Profane.
I posted some information regarding his stage name at the link below
which links to a thread where I update the Knapp saga. Once NY state has
completed its determination regarding Knapp, I will post an update on
Thanks Judy for your input and clarification for folks who aren't
familiar with Knapp.
Today I've been categorizing some old entries on my blog and ran across
one from July, 2009, in which I endorsed Knapp and Knapp Family
Counseling. Interestingly, the post is entitled Silence: There's more
than
I've posted a few times on FFL in the past. In at least one of those
post, I stated that I was supportive of John Knapp. I was his client for
right at two years, from around 7/2008 through 6/2010.
I have since publicly retracted (in March, 2011) my support and
endorsement of John Knapp.
In the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Carol jchwelch@... wrote:
snip
My statements addressing John M. Knapp's allegations
accusations
http://tossandripple.blogspot.com/p/my-statements-addressing-
john-m-knapps.html
(Note: Knapp's allegations are currently no longer accessible
because the
Reply to emptybill, somewhat delayed.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@... wrote:
Xeno
Thanks for the reply.
I went back and looked at a post of yours from July 26th.
You quoted Plotinus, which I found surprising. Around these parts no one
knows what to
Judy, now that I am briefly back from obligations I can take a stab at this. I
also scanned some of the more recent posts and followed a couple of links. I
would say on that basis that this particular situation is more complicated than
I originally thought. If Skolnick is not the halo crowned
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
Judy, now that I am briefly back from obligations I can take
a stab at this. I also scanned some of the more recent posts
and followed a couple of links. I would say on that basis that
this particular
Xeno, I have zero interest in either Andrew Skolnick
or John Knapp, or in discussing what you or anyone
else thinks about them. Neither person has really
been part of my life for many, many years. Don't
you think it would be odd and kind of obsessive for
me to still care about them, much less
I mentioned Skolnick and Knapp because they had been in the topic under
discussion, and there were certain things I wanted to say, but I had no
expectation you would reply. You seemed to like Skolnick's handling of the
situation, and that was that. You do not have to waste keystrokes saying
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@
wrote:
snip
Judy is good at comparing what someone wrote at one time
compared to another and dealing with precise phraseology,
but I am not sure
On Aug 7, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@ wrote:
snip
Judy is good at comparing what someone wrote at one time
compared to
What I get from this was that we have a women who had breast cancer,
was treated by Chopra at an Ayurvedic clinic, was declared to be cured
and died shortly thereafter. Is this not the the case?
It appears to me that the case he trying to make is that her Ayurvedic
treatments did not cure the
On Aug 7, 2011, at 9:03 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
What I get from this was that we have a women who had breast cancer, was
treated by Chopra at an Ayurvedic clinic, was declared to be cured and died
shortly thereafter. Is this not the the case?
It appears to me that the case he trying to make
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@... wrote:
What I get from this was that we have a women who had breast
cancer, was treated by Chopra at an Ayurvedic clinic, was
declared to be cured and died shortly thereafter. Is this
not the the case?
Thanks for weighing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@
wrote:
What I get from this was that we have a women who had breast
cancer, was treated by Chopra at an Ayurvedic clinic, was
declared to be cured and died
On Aug 7, 2011, at 10:03 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
What I get from this was that we have a women who had breast cancer, was
treated by Chopra at an Ayurvedic clinic, was declared to be cured and died
shortly thereafter. Is this not the the case?
It appears to me that the case he trying
OK, since Sal decided she'd step on my point and ignore my
request for comments only from those who knew nothing more
about the case than what Skolnick posted, I'll ask Steve
whether he notices any discrepancies between Skolnick's
account and the account Sal posted from Quackwatch.
And since Sal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
In the meantime, would you care to express an opinion
about Skolnick's offer to send a copy of the woman's
death certificate to anyone who asked?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
Xeno, I have zero interest in either Andrew Skolnick
or John Knapp, or in discussing what you or anyone
else thinks about them. Neither person has really
been part of my life for many, many years. Don't
you think it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
OK, since Sal decided she'd step on my point and ignore my
request for comments only from those who knew nothing more
about the case than what Skolnick posted, I'll ask Steve
whether he notices any discrepancies between
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@ wrote:
snip
Judy is good at comparing what someone wrote at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
OK, since Sal decided she'd step on my point and ignore my
request for comments only from those who knew nothing more
about the case than what
...Lawson did not post a single message in my
defense.
sparaig:
And I don't think I defended most people on that
forum. My agenda with Andrew...
My apologies for the remark, Mr. English.
Followup:
But, I didn't collect Crumb - can't stand the guy
or his work.
As for my
Xeno
I do not think of you as a liar, but something seems to be
getting you riled up. If you are feeling angry at these
people, I would wonder what the source really is. Anger
destroys balance of mind, I know this from first hand
experience, and the source of that anger may be
authfriend:
But as Lawson subsequently informed us here, somebody
writing on the Talk pages of the Wikipedia article on TM
dug up the actual ruling. And lo and behold, there *had*
been a settlement after all:
...you went above and beyond the call of duty and got the
actual court
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
OK, since Sal decided she'd step on my point and ignore my
request for comments only from those who knew nothing more
about the case than what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@...
wrote:
Xeno
I do not think of you as a liar, but something seems to be
getting you riled up. If you are feeling angry at these
people, I would wonder what the source really is. Anger
destroys balance of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:
snip
What you may be missing is that these are beliefs numerous
Maharishi Ayurveda MD's acquired from the Maharishi himself,
who told numerous people they'd be cured of their terminal
illnesses, who then died. Darth Veda then
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@ wrote:
snip
Judy is good at comparing what someone wrote at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@...
wrote:
Xeno
I do not think of you as a liar, but something seems to be
getting you riled up. If you are feeling angry at these
people, I would wonder what the source really is. Anger
destroys balance of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@... wrote:
snip
In fact, Donahue, if I recall the exchange correctly, asked
Chopra can everyone expect this kind of result from Maharishi
AYurveda?
And Chopra replied quite flatly no.
Whereupon Donahue looked at him and said
Barry, you're just too far behind on this discussion,
and too confused as to what it's about, to ever catch
up. Like I said, you need to stop digging, or the
hole you're in is going to fall in on you.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
snip
Finally, did you notice that she did not receive MA-V
treatment for her cancer--as Skolnick implied--but rather
as an adjunct to mitigate the effects of the chemotherapy?
Yikes. That should read, mitigate the SIDE effects
Yes, I had this lovely experience for a year ages 18-19. I had to be
hospitalized after my first two doses, it was so bad. Chemo was even harsher
then than it is now. Fred Ansfield, a pioneer in it, was my oncologist. Of
course I lost all my hair and had to sip blended food due to the sores
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mark Landau m@... wrote:
Yes, I had this lovely experience for a year ages 18-19. I
had to be hospitalized after my first two doses, it was so
bad.
And you were presumably in pretty good physical shape to
start with, being so young. Imagine what it's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
Given these discrepancies, would you care to give your
opinion of Skolnick's honesty in his description of her
case?
It would appear to be misleading based on the full picture.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
Given these discrepancies, would you care to give your
opinion of Skolnick's honesty in his description of her
case?
It would appear to be
: [FairfieldLife] Re: Re-Mindfulness
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, August 7, 2011, 7:18 AM
On Aug 7, 2011, at 9:03 AM, seventhray1 wrote:What I get from this was
that we have a women who had breast cancer, was treated by Chopra
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Denise Evans dmevans365@... wrote:
Ya'll know that one of Deepak's major partners is dying of
cancer...Dr. David Simon. Â I don't actually know the status
of his illness. Â He went into remission for awhile.
Google says he had a second brain surgery
: [FairfieldLife] Re: Re-Mindfulness
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, August 7, 2011, 6:16 PM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Denise Evans dmevans365@... wrote:
Ya'll know that one of Deepak's major partners is dying
Careful, dude. You could be in danger of falling into the realm
of mortal sin -- reading things for yourself and coming to your
own conclusions about what you read, rather than accept the
version presented to you by FFL's Arbiters Of Truth.
I mention this only in passing because you really,
No wonder Turq likes him so much. Birds of a feather.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@
wrote:
I did not know about this fellow, and my knowledge of the history of the
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartax...@yahoo.com wrote:
This forum is like that battle in the Bhagavad-Gita. Former friends and
relatives who once seemed to share the same perspective now are arrayed on
the battle-field with opposing views. Maybe some
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
Careful, dude. You could be in danger of falling into the realm
of mortal sin -- reading things for yourself and coming to your
own conclusions about what you read, rather than accept the
version presented to you by FFL's
whynotnow7:
No wonder Turq likes him so much. Birds of a feather.
Uh, no. Turq hates Skolnick's guts because Skolnick
made fun of Turq's association with Zen Master Rama.
Well, 'made fun of' is an understatement - 'skewered'
would probably be more accurate! Skolnick turned
Turq into
turquoiseb:
From my perspective, Skolnick essentially beat the
socks off of his TM-puppet opponents in almost every
interaction...
You're probably still upset with Skolnick for calling
you a liar, a phoney, and a true believer for taking
up for Zen Master Rama. Skolnick beat the socks of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, richardwillytexwilliams willytex@...
wrote:
whynotnow7:
No wonder Turq likes him so much. Birds of a feather.
Uh, no. Turq hates Skolnick's guts because Skolnick
made fun of Turq's association with Zen Master Rama.
Well, 'made fun of' is an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@... wrote:
snip
One thing to realize is that Skolnick didn't just write
an article in JAMA but went on a crusade against all
things TM.
True. But...
WHenever Hari Sharma or Deepak Chopra appeared in public
within driving distance of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:
snip
Andrew is probably one of the most insightful people when it
comes to TM and valid criticism. It's that naked, raw insight
that so disturbs TM-TB's.
For an example of Andrew Skolnick's naked, raw insight,
I *am* going to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
snip
Skolnick got *creamed*, repeatedly, by me and Lawson and
Kurt and P and other TMers. He never quite seemed to get
that in a forum context, you can't just tell falsehoods
and expect to get away with them. He was used to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@... wrote:
snip
Well, Trancenet often cited (cites?) the German Government
study on TM
(The study was *cited* by the government but not *done*
by the government, FWIW.)
which is actually biased enough that when I found it being
cited in
How do I access that archive please?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, richardwillytexwilliams willytex@
wrote:
whynotnow7:
No wonder Turq likes him so much. Birds of a feather.
Uh, no. Turq hates Skolnick's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@... wrote:
How do I access that archive please?
The FFL archive? I gave you the message numbers. Not
sure what you're asking.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Oh...I though they were messages on the alt usenet site...Thanks.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@ wrote:
How do I access that archive please?
The FFL archive? I gave you the message numbers.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@... wrote:
How do I access that archive please?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/messages
Plug the message numbers from Judy's post into the box labeled Message # and
click Go.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
...I am not seeing a Go key on my keyboard...Is it some combination like
F6+G+O??
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@ wrote:
How do I access that archive please?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@... wrote:
...I am not seeing a Go key on my keyboard...Is it some combination like
F6+G+O??
I bet you don't have a box labeled Message # on your
keyboard either, do you?
Dump that old technology, dude, and get a modern keyboard
Reminds me of that Nissan Leaf ad I think it is, where it shows a bunch of
appliances, like microwaves and toasters powered by two cycle internal
combustion engines. Pretty funny.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@... wrote:
Reminds me of that Nissan Leaf ad I think it is, where it shows
a bunch of appliances, like microwaves and toasters powered by
two cycle internal combustion engines. Pretty funny.
http://youtu.be/j0sCCJFkEbE
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, richardwillytexwilliams willytex@...
wrote:
whynotnow7:
No wonder Turq likes him so much. Birds of a feather.
Uh, no. Turq hates Skolnick's guts because Skolnick
made fun of Turq's association with Zen Master Rama.
Well, 'made fun of' is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
P.S.: I have to say I find it *astonishing* that anyone
would wonder why it's important to expose liars and refute
lies, especially on a supposedly spiritually oriented
newsgroup. If spirituality is about anything, it's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
P.S.: I have to say I find it *astonishing* that anyone
would wonder why it's important to expose liars and refute
lies, especially on a
Regarding post #180875, the opening quote from John Knapp is undated, but says
he had been writing for 13 years, and the post you mentioned was, if I
interpret this correctly, written about end of the first year of those 13
years. There might be a point to this if John experienced absolutely
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
Regarding post #180875, the opening quote from John Knapp
is undated,
Kapp's FFL post that I quoted was dated June 20, 2008,
the day before my post.
but says he had been writing for 13 years,
He said he
Well if this is the case you are probably right.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@
wrote:
Regarding post #180875, the opening quote from John Knapp
is undated,
Kapp's FFL post
Barry, if I fall into hell it will be my own doing. Judy does make good points
as do you. My knowledge of 'our' subject here is not encyclopaedic. I can be
misled. But I do like to come to my own conclusions. Judy is good at comparing
what someone wrote at one time compared to another and
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2011 6:28:25 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Re-Mindfulness
Barry, if I fall into hell it will be my own doing. Judy does make good points
as do you. My knowledge of 'our' subject here is not encyclopaedic. I can be
misled. But I do like to come to my own
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
snip
As for Skolnick, I thought he approached his subject with
vigour and did not pull punches, but he seems to have
researched his attacks well.
Let's just take a quick look at a bit of Skolnick's post-
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
snip
Judy is good at comparing what someone wrote at one time
compared to another and dealing with precise phraseology,
but I am not sure she always is able to distinguish between
irony, malice, and simple
They didn't randomly start talking about him, it was in reference to a
Wikipedia article.
Read it again - Vaj is the only used who used present tense, Judy used
past sense and Lawson future tense.
So you and Vaj are the only ones that come out obsessed, Vaj for the
present tense and you, for not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
May I point out that anything having to do with
Andrew Skolnick happened maybe TEN YEARS AGO?
And that these two TM obsessives are not only
still talking about him and trying to suck other
people into their obsession
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
May I point out that anything having to do with
Andrew Skolnick happened maybe TEN YEARS AGO?
And that these two TM obsessives are not only
still
On Aug 5, 2011, at 1:50 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
May I point out that anything having to do with
Andrew Skolnick happened maybe TEN YEARS AGO?
And that these two TM obsessives are not only
still talking about him and trying to suck other
people into their obsession all these years on,
they're
On Aug 5, 2011, at 4:03 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
Actually, last contact I had with Andrew was a year or
three ago, during wiki editing wars over the Transcendental
Meditation wikipedia entry.
Lawson, the point I am trying to make is that you
really don't see anything odd about there being
On Aug 4, 2011, at 10:16 PM, sparaig wrote:
Whether science was done right the first time or not is immaterial.
It must be done over and over again, or it isn't science.
If it's to be done over and over, it needs to be independently - not
by MUM or the David Lynch Mob or Friends of TM
HA HA like you're one to talk(!). You understand attachment very well though.
Non-attachment, not so much. You keep thinking it is some kind of mood or a
'tude. It isn't.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
May I point out that anything having to do with
On Aug 4, 2011, at 10:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
Shall I invite Andrew to come critique everyone here?
His background is such that he will, at best, call you self-deluded
for what you (and I and Judy and everyone else) espouse here.
It would be nice to have him here, but honestly so little
Maharishi saw that couching TM in terms of modern science was the way to sell
it to the West (and perhaps create an endless puzzle for fools like you to get
lost in), but essentially measuring metabolic markers to determine spiritual
states isn't the point.
The point is to get on with it, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
May I point out that anything having to do with
Andrew Skolnick happened maybe TEN YEARS AGO?
And that these two TM obsessives are not only
still talking about him and trying to suck other
people into their obsession
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
May I point out that anything having to do with
Andrew Skolnick happened maybe TEN
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:
On Aug 5, 2011, at 4:03 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
Actually, last contact I had with Andrew was a year or
three ago, during wiki editing wars over the Transcendental
Meditation wikipedia entry.
Lawson, the point I am
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:
On Aug 4, 2011, at 10:16 PM, sparaig wrote:
Whether science was done right the first time or not is immaterial.
It must be done over and over again, or it isn't science.
If it's to be done over and over, it needs to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:
On Aug 4, 2011, at 10:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
Shall I invite Andrew to come critique everyone here?
His background is such that he will, at best, call you self-deluded
for what you (and I and Judy and everyone else)
The very IDEA of becoming so obsessed with one little
view of life and/or spirituality that one feels the
need to defend it against its enemies strikes me
as just as insane...
sparaig:
You and Judy get along fine now, i take it...
Let's see, Turq has been obsessed with TM and the
On Aug 5, 2011, at 10:01 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:
On Aug 4, 2011, at 10:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
Shall I invite Andrew to come critique everyone here?
His background is such that he will, at best, call you self-
deluded
for
If it's to be done over and over, it needs to be
independently - not by MUM or the David Lynch Mob
or Friends of TM here or there...
sparaig:
I keep asking you to identify the study where the
subject was identified as being in samadhi.
Apparently the study was done by Alan
Andrew is probably one of the most insightful
people when it comes to and valid criticism.
It's that naked, raw insight that so disturbs
-TB's...
authfriend:
ROFL. Raw, naked insight unmixed with respect
for accuracy.
ROTFL!!!
Subject: Andrew's notion of Historical
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:
On Aug 5, 2011, at 10:01 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
On Aug 4, 2011, at 10:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
Shall I invite Andrew to come critique everyone here?
Can you find a mention of samadhi in reference to this study? I've never been
able to.
L.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, richardwillytexwilliams willytex@...
wrote:
If it's to be done over and over, it needs to be
independently - not by MUM or the David Lynch Mob
or
I did not know about this fellow, and my knowledge of the history of the
Wikipedia edits is cursory, just based on my following links in replying to the
previous post; I have never edited a Wikipedia article, but I do know that
sometimes there are problems with the ideology impaired attempting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
On Aug 4, 2011, at 7:46 PM, sparaig wrote:
snip
ANdrew accused me of reverting an entire section when I
first came into Wikipedia. He appolgized after I
This forum is like that battle in the Bhagavad-Gita.
Is that the best you can do? Let's get even more grandiose and call it, FFL:
Battle For Spiritual Truth And The Future Dominion Of The Universe Itself.
or, alternatively, a bunch of fools talkin' smack.:-)
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
I did not know about this fellow, and my knowledge of the
history of the Wikipedia edits is cursory, just based on my
following links in replying to the previous post; I have
never edited a Wikipedia article,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
snip
I do not know Vaj, I do not know Barry, although we cross
paths here, but I did meet John Knapp very briefly, more
than a decade and a half before he left the TM movement,
and I really did not have much
P.S.: I have to say I find it *astonishing* that anyone
would wonder why it's important to expose liars and refute
lies, especially on a supposedly spiritually oriented
newsgroup. If spirituality is about anything, it's about
being and living as authentically as possible, IMHO.
--- In
Sitting on both sides of the track,
The Mahabharata does just that. Now where is the butterthe Gopi's...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@... wrote:
This forum is like that battle in the Bhagavad-Gita.
Is that the best you can do? Let's get even more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
I did not know about this fellow, and my knowledge of the history of the
Wikipedia edits is cursory, just based on my following links in replying to
the previous post; I have never edited a Wikipedia
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
On Aug 4, 2011, at 7:46 PM, sparaig wrote:
snip
ANdrew accused
But who is is He Man and who is Skeletor?
L
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@... wrote:
This forum is like that battle in the Bhagavad-Gita.
Is that the best you can do? Let's get even more grandiose and call it, FFL:
Battle For Spiritual Truth And The Future
Reply to Lawson (sparaig) via Judy's (authfriend) post.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
On Aug 1, 2011, at 8:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
