With your latest gnuplot, I got:
...
Enable generation of PDF files
...
So it *seems* PDF support is built properly now. Also the bogus
pdflib.dylib symlink is not present.
Cheers,
Max
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Several packages use fields which do not exist:
source2directory
nosource2directory
nosource3directory
In particular, these packages:
tcltk-8.4.1-1.info (Jeffrey Whitaker)
ispell-german-20011124-1.info (Martin Costabel)
tetex-texmf-2.0.2-1.info (Dave Morrison)
ncl-4.2.0a27-2.info (Jeffrey
I just run fink checksums (and I would welcome if all you out there
with a big local source archive want to try it, too :-). This is what I
got:
Checksum of tarball /Volumes/Data/FinkBase/src/default-1.7.tar.bz2 of
package mplayer-skin-default-1.7-1 is incorrect.
Checksum of tarball
Am Freitag, 28.03.03 um 23:20 Uhr schrieb Damien Pollet:
Hi,
So first I posted a package for the XHTML DTDs (to use with emacs
psgml as far as I'm concerned). Though these are XML DTDs, I register
them to /sw/etc/sgml/catalog.d too since psgml doesn't see to use the
XML catalog in
Am Samstag, 29.03.03 um 02:09 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines:
On Friday, March 28, 2003, at 04:50 AM, Max Horn wrote:
I did mention it just to point out what I now pointed out again above - so far we only posted *major* news announcements to SF.net, for the single reasons that then we usually get
Am Freitag, 28.03.03 um 05:05 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines:
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 05:29 AM, Max Horn wrote:
In fact, sf even has a facility that lets you include sf releases
right on your pages. So, if someone has time to code it, we might
consider using only the sf news, reprogram
Am Donnerstag, 27.03.03 um 08:57 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines:
Just noticed, sf offers some more RSS feeds now, for every project:
News Releases, News Releases (full text), File Releases, and Summary
(with stats).
See http://sourceforge.net/export/rss2_project.php?group_id=17203 for
the links.
Err, is there any reason you SPAM the fink-devel mailing list with
this??? Please stop doing that!
Max
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register
Am Sonntag, 23.03.03 um 03:20 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines:
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 03:40 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote:
To summarize, I believe a separate crypto tree is still useful in
Fink. Even if Apple has purchased a licence or permit to distribute
openssl along with Mac OS X, for example,
Am Samstag, 22.03.03 um 02:52 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines:
On Friday, March 21, 2003, at 06:48 AM, David wrote:
There are a few issues which need to be addressed, mainly a few
alterations to the fink code that have to be carefully discussed. I
cannot really decide on them, nor do I know what
Changing the subject line as this is now really a different discussion.
Ben suggested that we abolish the crypto/ tree.
Disclaimer: I didn't originally invent the crypto/ tree thingy, it was
there before I even joined Fink. Also note that for me, and also for
Ben Hines, there are no legal
Am Freitag, 21.03.03 um 14:32 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison:
Dear fink developers,
Because python is now in the crypto tree, everything that depends or
builddepends on python should (in principle) be moved to the crypto
tree.
Around 20 or 25 currently-stable packages would be affected, and
Am Dienstag, 18.03.03 um 09:02 Uhr schrieb Christian Schaffner:
[...]
Log Message:
Fixed line endings (Need to check for that too, next time. Could fink
validate
do that for me?)
You mean mac vs. unix line endings in .info files ? Yes I think we
could do that, although in theory CVS should be
Am Dienstag, 18.03.03 um 02:54 Uhr schrieb Adam Skwersky:
Hi,
That's not what I want. I just want to be able to recompile everything
and
then install everything in one step. That would make the development
cycle
much easier. Mathias pretty much understood what I wanted to do (skip
the
Am Samstag, 15.03.03 um 23:54 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines:
A Java SDK virtual pkg seems to be needed. Apple's 1.4.1 update did
not install the headers, causing any package that uses
/Library/Java/Home/include or /Library/Java/Home/Headers to fail for
any user that installed Java 1.4.1 from software
FYI David, we (the project leaders) are already pursuing an entry into
the Apple Design Awards, in either the open source or the server
category. I do not believe the innovation aware is really compatible
with Fink.
Max
---
This SF.net
Am Montag, 17.03.03 um 10:40 Uhr schrieb mathias meyer:
to correct myself:
of course another 'fink rebuild foo' will delete the source directory.
if you want fink only to do parts of
unpacking/patching/compiling/installing you would have to edit
Engine.pm. this is NOT really recommended but i
Am Montag, 17.03.03 um 23:04 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison:
Hi Max.
Well, my idea is that we do something fairly sensible, but then offer
the
user the chance to see the file we changed and edit it some more if
they
want.
Yeah I understood that was your intention.
This non-CLI setup is mainly
Am Freitag, 14.03.03 um 21:13 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison:
[...]
case yes) check if source %p/sw/init.csh is already in the
.tcshrc
How exactly could this be done? Considering that scripts can include
arbitrary other scripts? Also, the source statement could be
Hi folks,
Currently all Fink team members at SourceForge.net have full write
access to the entire CVS repository. This imposes some problems on us:
since everybody gets full power, we can only allow people in that we
trust to not mess up anything by accident, or whatever else. For this
Am Donnerstag, 13.03.03 um 19:21 Uhr schrieb John Harper:
On Wednesday, Mar 12, 2003, at 18:33 US/Pacific, Benjamin Reed wrote:
John Harper wrote:
Is this the error due to glColorTableEXT etc being multiply defined?
If so, that should be fixed in our next release. If you want to test
this, try
We keep getting requests / bug reports due to problems caused by
packages missing from the bindist (ghostscript). There is no really
useful error message printed in these cases by apt-get / FinkCommander
etc. right now...
So I think it would be good to at least have a FAQ entry that explains
Am Mittwoch, 12.03.03 um 00:48 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison:
When the problems with indexing showed up in fink-0.12.0, I think we
agreed
that 0.12.0 shouldn't be the basis of a binary distro.
I was worried that removing the (un-logged) fix for a previous indexing
problem might somehow break
Am Montag, 10.03.03 um 02:35 Uhr schrieb Alexander Strange:
There is now a complete mirror of the Fink package sources available.
It's sharing space with DarwinPorts on
http://distfiles.opendarwin.org/ and I would appreciate more mirrors
of it. You can rsync at
Am Montag, 10.03.03 um 22:59 Uhr schrieb Alexander Strange:
On Monday, March 10, 2003, at 07:31 AM, Max Horn wrote:
What do you mean exactly when you talk about features for the
mirror ? A mirror is only a dumb file server, so I don't understand
what you mean here...
I meant things that I
Am Sonntag, 09.03.03 um 23:26 Uhr schrieb Peter O'Gorman:
On Monday, March 10, 2003, at 06:16 AM, Ben Hines wrote:
Yes. sane-backends includes a whole bunch of scanner drivers which
are either known to not work or not known to work. I don't want to
see this in stable.
.. so document that. A
The german computer magazine c't (http://heise.de/ct) has an article
about Fink in its latest issue 6/2003, p264+265. Sadly it's not online,
but see http://heise.de/ct/inhverz/search.shtml?T=finkSuchen=suchen.
It's actually quite a glowing review, and presents many nice details.
It also
Am Sonntag, 09.03.03 um 02:10 Uhr schrieb Martin Costabel:
Alexander Strange wrote:
[]
Checksum of tarball /Users/feanor/sw/src/siag-3.5.2.tar.gz of package
siag-3.5.2-5 is incorrect.
Does your script perhaps report a bad md5sum also when the source
download fails? The copies of
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
Von: Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Do, 6. Mär 2003 13:14:15 Europe/Berlin
An: Ben Hines [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [Fink-devel] Epoch
Am Donnerstag, 06.03.03 um 04:12 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines:
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 10:14 AM, Max Horn wrote
Am Donnerstag, 06.03.03 um 04:14 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines:
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 10:42 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
If you want to use the system emacs, don't make it depend on the
emacsen-common,
and make sure that emacs is called as /usr/bin/emacs.
or just let it use either one,
Am Donnerstag, 06.03.03 um 14:54 Uhr schrieb thomas kotzian:
I have upgraded xfree86 to 4.3.0 with the xfree86-upgrade script.
gtk+2 cannot compile and exits with:
checking for IceConnectionNumber in -lICE... yes
checking for XRenderFindFormat in -lXrender... yes
checking for XftFontOpen in
At 21:56 Uhr -0500 04.03.2003, Kyle Moffett wrote:
[...]
Exactly, I think that the 'epoch' system is very problematic. Once
a package begins using an epoch, it must continue to use the epoch
for the remainder of its life, which could be very long, even after
many version changes.
I doN't see
At 17:10 Uhr -0800 04.03.2003, Ben Hines wrote:
On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 05:21 AM, Max Horn wrote:
At 22:39 Uhr -0800 03.03.2003, Ben Hines wrote:
On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 11:38 AM, Justin Hallett wrote:
okay %e is great thanks...and I agree, but I think it will be used, I have
At 18:10 Uhr +0100 05.03.2003, Jorge Acereda Maciá wrote:
Shouldn't there be a placeholder for the provided emacs installation?
Why?
Max
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger
for complex code. Debugging
At 12:29 Uhr -0500 05.03.2003, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Max Horn wrote:
But my motivation to agree to this is most definitely not due to
what the debian policy says. We are not debian! Sure we can look at
how they do things, and if we like it, do it the same way, but I
feel in no way bound
At 23:29 Uhr -0800 03.03.2003, Alexander Strange wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/fink
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv13084
Modified Files:
bootstrap.pl
Log Message:
Fixing bootstrap on darwin/x86 for bbraun co
Index: bootstrap.pl
At 4:49 Uhr -0500 04.03.2003, Alexander Strange wrote:
On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 12:39 AM, Ben Hines wrote:
- autosync of sources: Need a machine running fink selfupdate-cvs;
fink fetch-all; rsync to server every 10 minutes or something
similar. Any ideas there? OpenDarwin is going to help
At 22:39 Uhr -0800 03.03.2003, Ben Hines wrote:
On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 11:38 AM, Justin Hallett wrote:
okay %e is great thanks...and I agree, but I think it will be used, I have
a number of rc pkgs.
It is almost good that it is not documented. It really should not be
used except in grave
At 19:23 Uhr -0500 04.03.2003, Alexander Strange wrote:
[...]
- Are we sure we have the right to mirror the source to any fink
package, or could some of them be licensed under licenses that
forbid mirroring?
Restrictive packages will be removed from the mirror as soon as we
have code in
At 17:38 Uhr -0500 04.03.2003, Kyle Moffett wrote:
On Tuesday, Mar 4, 2003, at 09:01 US/Eastern, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Max Horn wrote:
E.g. take the example of 5.0-RC1 followed by 5.0. What do you
propse should be done here to make it debian version compliant?
4.9 and 5.0 ? or 5.0 and 5.0a
Ah
sarcasm
I wasn't aware that we had resolved all the issues with this? And
that we agreed to release it to unstable... The discussion on this on
fink-devel must have slipped by me. For example, I completly missed
all the responses to Masanori's worries regarding the GTK+ 2.0 -
2.2 +
At 11:29 Uhr -0700 03.03.2003, Justin Hallett wrote:
since I think i was the first to try and use the new Epoch in fink 0.12, I
think the docs are very limited and completly unclear.
First there should be an example secondly ppl must know to add it to the
Splittoffs as well as the Main pkg
At 12:26 Uhr -0700 03.03.2003, Justin Hallett wrote:
hehe np, I was just listing them for dmalloc to document or to have record
of it for others... is there an Epoch version percent expantion var?
Yes there is: %e (see PkgVersion.pm, line 136).
Cause I think it'd be nice to have if we start using
We should add an entry to the FAQ, section 2 Relations with Other
Projects that explains how our relations to darwinports /
opendarwin.org are... shouldn't we? I keep hearing that question on
IRC and the mailing lists.
Max
---
This sf.net
Maybe we can add a FAQ item on the libpng / libpng3 issue. I know we
are transiting to libpng3 anyway, but for those people in a (semi)
broken state already it would be nice if they had a way to find out
what is going on and how to get out of it. Also it would be
convenient for us: whenever a
At 12:39 Uhr +1300 02.03.2003, Nigel Stanger wrote:
I have a package that has some optional monthly and weekly scripts, that
would normally be run by the /usr/sbin/periodic script. However, fink
doesn't provide any mechanism for plugging into the periodic script list.
Normally, you'd just throw
At 23:06 Uhr -0800 26.02.2003, Ben Hines wrote:
Well, pogma at least read this and fixed his package, did anyone
else? Anyone else care? Is the shlibs field really that difficult to
get? Everyone clear on this? I better not see people updating
packages and doing it wrong. :)
Welcome in the real
At 22:54 Uhr -0800 26.02.2003, Ben Hines wrote:
I know you said you think it did, but really i don't think it does
work without the revision in the BuildDepends:
Found Python version 2.3
Warning: Missing libxml2-python
Enabling debugger
checking for libxml libraries = 2.5.2... configure: error:
At 12:19 Uhr -0800 20.02.2003, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.2/unstable/crypto/finkinfo
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv6689
Added Files:
python23-2.3-2.info python23-2.3-2.patch
Log Message:
New upstream (alpha) version.
--- NEW FILE: python23-2.3-2.info ---
I just noticed that various packages install multiple directories
into /sw/share/doc (I am not talking about splitoffs which also cause
this to some extent). For example, xmltv installs both
/sw/share/doc/xmltv-0.5.8 and /sw/share/doc/xmltv. Likewise libxml2
(my own package) even installs
At 17:13 Uhr -0500 25.02.2003, Kyle Moffett wrote:
On Tuesday, Feb 25, 2003, at 11:15 US/Eastern, Max Horn wrote:
Hm I wonder why your email client misreads my time zone like that =)
[...]
Yuck. We have already determined problems with this method, and it
seems crude, especially when better
I wonder, are these BuildDepends in gnome-vfs (and gnome-vfs-ssl)
really necessary?
BuildDepends: pkgconfig, gtk-doc (= 0.9-4), libjpeg, libpng,
libtiff, netpbm, audiofile, db3 (= 3.3.11-8), esound, glib,
orbit-dev, readline (= 4.3-5), giflib, imlib, gconf-dev,
gnome-libs-dev, oaf-dev,
At 22:15 Uhr +0100 18.02.2003, David wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello.
I would like to add the fink packager manager itself as a project to
Freshmeat. I know that we are already present with the distribution
but the package manager itself might be interesting to
At 11:27 Uhr +0100 19.02.2003, David wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Mittwoch, Februar 19, 2003, at 09:32 Uhr, Max Horn wrote:
snip?
Yes. First off, the package manager never was announced widely, and
there is no reason to do so with this release. I am not sure
At 15:42 Uhr +0100 17.02.2003, jfm wrote:
hmac.3, mdc2.3, pem.3, rc4.3, ssl.3 and md5.3.openssl097
are real files here, coming from openssl097-dev_0.9.7-2 _ no links,
thus in particular breaking your cycle.
Look in your deb if they are there _ else something may have
gone wrong in your build.
At 8:09 Uhr -0500 16.02.2003, David R. Morrison wrote:
I think it would be useful to have a configuration option governing the
index behavior. Sometimes, I am doing a lot of editing of info files,
and then I might want to turn the current indexing behavior on (instead of
always having to type
At 16:59 Uhr +0100 16.02.2003, jfm wrote:
On Sunday, Feb 16, 2003, at 02:43 Europe/Brussels, Max Horn wrote:
... we could add a fink index foo.info command, which would add
the specified .info file(s) to the index. This way, you could just
(re)index the files you are working on, avoiding
At 9:08 Uhr -0800 16.02.2003, Ben Hines wrote:
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 08:44 AM, Max Horn wrote:
At 8:09 Uhr -0500 16.02.2003, David R. Morrison wrote:
I think it would be useful to have a configuration option governing the
index behavior. Sometimes, I am doing a lot of editing
At 20:13 Uhr +0100 16.02.2003, thomas kotzian wrote:
i wanted to install evolution but there are other packages installed
that depend on gtkhtml and evolution wants to have gtkhtml1.1
installed.
here is the trace:
dpkg -i /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/gnome/
At 17:27 Uhr -0500 16.02.2003, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Actually, there is a runtime issue here too. If you wind up switching
gtkhtml1.1 to gtkhtml, then you can't open/reply to messages in
Evolution 1.2.x--there is an error message saying words to the effect of
HTML component couldn't be
I just wanted to build gtkhtml to look into the issues mentioned in
the evolution dependency collisions thread. I was quite surprised
by the result: it wants to install both the gnome 1 and gnome 2
packages, e.g. both gnome-vfs-dev and gnome-vfs2-dev.
That seems to be very odd to me.
At 21:15 Uhr -0700 14.02.2003, Ludwin wrote:
My Computer speaks french, and the Gimp software I have just
downloaded speaks mainly English. However, there is french as well.
I imagine fink can somehow detect that my ibook is in French, so
that Gimp shows some cammands in French. But this
I do not mind that much if we change to .tcshrc from a techincal
point of view. What I fear, though, is that we also will have some
troubles in the transition period. Basically not so advanced users
with a .cshrc based setup will start reading about .tcshrc. In the
worst case, they may start
At 15:29 Uhr -0500 15.02.2003, David R. Morrison wrote:
There have been no updates to the Fink package manager for two weeks,
other then Ben Hines' adding 10.2.4 as a recognized OS X version this morning.
Max said he wanted to do more things before the next package manager release,
but I would
After suffering from extremely bad fink performance on my iBook in
the past couple months (despite the nice improvements recently done),
I begin to wonder if maybe we should reconsider our current package
DB indexing behavior.
The current approach is restricted in its performance by the fact
At 23:25 Uhr +0900 12.02.2003, Masanori Sekino wrote:
I removed popt, which declares BuildDependsOnly: True, from
Depends line of oaf. At the sametime, I added popt to
BuildDepends line of following packages:
anjuta0.9.99-3
eroaster 2.0.12-2
evolution 1.2.2-2
galeon
This is called a stale lock, and to get it fixed, one has to submit
a suport request (which I will do now).
Max
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
At 12:29 Uhr +0100 11.02.2003, Christian Schaffner wrote:
On Dienstag, Februar 11, 2003, at 12:19 Uhr, Max Horn wrote:
This is called a stale lock, and to get it fixed, one has to
submit a suport request (which I will do now).
Thanks! Is it ok if i (as a simple fink packager) submit
At 13:08 Uhr -0500 10.02.2003, Pai-Hsiang Hsiao wrote:
The good news is, gnomemeeting has been ported to OSX.
Cool :-)
The bad news is, fink's packages of pwlib and openh323 are out-of-date.
Nobody is maintaining them...
I am interested in getting these packages to work, so I am
At 0:02 Uhr -0800 08.02.2003, Ben Hines wrote:
On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 08:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How long can I expect the older version to be around?
Forever. Calm down. You can go back to the old one. I'll fix your package.
However, the old openssl-dev needs to be
At 6:03 Uhr -0700 08.02.2003, jeff whitaker wrote:
Max et al: I've pulled the xfree86 package (and the xfree86-base,
xfree86-base-threaded upgrades it depends on) from unstable and put them
in expermental/jswhit/x11-system. Probably should have put them there in
the first place - I apologize
There are various people on fink-beginners who already installed this
and ask for help. Maybe we can enhance the news item to describe how
to get out of the situation?
Max
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise
At 14:50 Uhr +0100 08.02.2003, David wrote:
[...]
Actually, Max, Drm and Benjamin will have to make a decision. I would
much prefer, that people do not post to the fink-devel list, but send
the announcement to me. After I have verified the information in the
Mail and maybe even talked to the
At 15:54 Uhr +0100 08.02.2003, David wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Samstag, Februar 8, 2003, at 03:13 Uhr, Max Horn wrote:
snip
Well the drawbacks of this approach (compared to the advantages you list):
Two bottlenecks instead of one (first you
At 3:01 Uhr +0900 09.02.2003, Masanori Sekino wrote:
First, I apologize for my announcement, which was made in
inappropriate way and surprised you.
Masanori, this was definitly not directed at you in particular, and I
don't believe you have to apologize. In any case I have no ill
bearings
Masanori,
it's clearly not sufficient to just announce this to three of our
mailing lists. We also will need a web page article and news item
(properly based on your email). Also this could have been sent to
fink-announce... if it had been discussed beforehand... oh well :-)
Max
At 18:12 Uhr -0800 07.02.2003, Ben Hines wrote:
This is very bad. Fink users, don't install this.
Virex 7.2, free to all .mac members installs:
/Volumes/Virex 7.2.dmg/Virex 7.2.pkg 328 % lsbom
Contents/Resources/Virex\ 7.2.bom | grep sw
./sw40775 0/80
./sw/lib40775 0/80
[...]
Ben: I figured that the versioned dependency on xfree86-base |
xfree86-base-threaded would be temporary, perhaps just for the first
revision, in order to allow people to upgrade.
I see the logic behind it, but IMHO the costs do not warrant it, so i
agree with Ben, this should be removed
At 7:50 Uhr +0100 06.02.2003, David wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Donnerstag, Februar 6, 2003, at 01:23 Uhr, Benjamin Reed wrote:
(so why that would be the case is beyond me right now).
Because they might wish to take advantage of the speed improvements
in
I think 0.11.2 can go to stable. However, I would like to wait a bit
more till we release 0.12 - I want to add Ben's epoch support first
and test it a little.
Max
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM +
At 15:06 Uhr -0500 05.02.2003, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Feb 5,2003 13:01:11 -0700, Justin Hallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
I think my cvs patch could make 0.12 as well, I'll add it to the tacker.
Do that, then I will review it, but I wouldn't hold my breath on it
making it to 0.12. That
At 15:53 Uhr -0500 05.02.2003, Jeremy Erwin wrote:
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 03:29 PM, John Clements wrote:
This is off-topic, but I'm hoping that someone can point out what
an idiot I am.
Problem: I can't get gcc to recognize either the CPATH or
C_INCLUDE_PATH environment
Please read this if your package currently depends on openssl.
The new openssl 0.9.7 is source but not binary compatible. Hence, I
renamed openssl-shlibs in it to openssl097-shlibs (as discussed here
previously). I will soon commit a change to *all* packages that
depends on openssl, with only
At 18:43 Uhr -0500 04.02.2003, Jeremy Erwin wrote:
I am porting a number of libraries that have extensive example code.
I have been
putting
DocFiles: examples/hello/* examples/testgrid/*
and the like in my info files, but flattening the directory
structure might not be such a great idea. Is
At 5:52 Uhr -0700 01.02.2003, jeff whitaker wrote:
Ben: Thanks for the update. I'm somewhat at a loss of how to proceed
with a 4.3.0 package. Since it contains thread support, it should replace
both xfree86-base and xfree86-base-threaded. At the same time, I'd like
to merge the -base and
At 12:50 Uhr +0100 31.01.2003, David wrote:
On Freitag, J§nner 31, 2003, at 01:01 Uhr, Max Horn wrote:
[...]
I think that it would be an excellent idea to use something like a
Wiki. If you want I can install such a system on one of the boxen I
have authority over.
shrug Never got the hang
OK, my promised second mail will have to wait till tomorrow. I just
got home after spending 8 hours in my car, 4 of those standing in one
spot on the highway, at -2 degree celsius with no car heating
(highway was blocked for hours due to a crash). I really don't feel
like anything but sleep
Out openssl package is currently at 0.9.6g. However, both 0.9.6h and
0.9.7 are out for some time now. Naturally I decided to skip directly
to 0.9.7.
This posed some problems, since the openssl package used to hardcode
0.9.6 into the .dylib filename, and also used 0.9.6 in the
compatibility
At 14:44 Uhr -0500 30.01.2003, David R. Morrison wrote:
Sure, but I think there are really two things going on.
1) If you have an old imlib and are building a package which links libpng3,
there is no way you can ever build it correctly.
Could somebody explain to me why exactly this is a
At 8:27 Uhr -0500 30.01.2003, David R. Morrison wrote:
Well, Max, I like your strategy and I agree it would be a great application
of the shlibs project. However, this part of the shlibs project isn't
implemented yet! I have to write the code and integrate it into Fink,
and I haven't had time
At 16:02 Uhr -0600 30.01.2003, Dierk Polzin wrote:
Why is search.h missing from darwin???
Where can I find it to run twalk??
You can't.
If you do a man twalk the man page for the missing functions comes
up -- tsearch, tfind, tdelete, and twalk are all listed as
being available on that
Hi folks,
in the recent months, the problems with Fink's dependency engine (and
dpkg's, and the way they interact) have become more and more
apparent. Various problems are basically impossible to overcome with
the current design, hence it seems we need a new full fledged
dependency engine.
Uhm, so what am I supposed to do for sawfish or windowmaker (both
depend on libpng)? Obviously just removing the dependency is wrong.
Max
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2
At 17:12 Uhr -0500 29.01.2003, Alexander Hansen wrote:
A future issue for concern (after libpng vs. libpng3) is gtkhtml vs.
gtkhtml1.1 . A lot of the users have GNOME, and gnome-core-shlibs
depends on gtkhtml, as does gnucash (the two examples I actually have
installed). However, evolution-1.2
With regards to this disscussion:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200301/msg01676.html
- it seems we have to change the License field of mplayer to
restrictive as we are not allowed to distributed binaries of it.
Furthermore, we have to consider whether can afford to
At 18:10 Uhr -0800 26.01.2003, Ben Hines wrote:
Does anyone object to including FinkCommander on the next Fink .dmg?
It is pretty mature these days.
I am thinking it would be separate from the .pkg, perhaps in a
FinkCommander folder with its own readme files and such.
Sounds OK I guess.
BTW
At 0:10 Uhr -0500 27.01.2003, Carsten wrote:
Hi Charles,
There's no built-in method in Fink but you can just put CVS commands
in InstallScript. It would only be good for personal use, not really
for an official fink package. I do this to build the latest
FinkCommander and a couple other
One of the last changes to speed up re-index causes a regression. Now
if I enter e.g. fink list -o when my index is dirty, I get this:
fink list -o
Fink has detected that your package cache is out of date and needs an
update, but does not have privileges to modify it. Please re-run fink as
At 19:29 Uhr +0100 27.01.2003, Martin Costabel wrote:
On lundi, jan 27, 2003, at 16:30 Europe/Paris, Alexander Hansen wrote:
It may not work when virtual packages are involved. I just did a test
to see what would happen if I wanted to remove my xfree86 installation:
[]
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at
I just synced the base packages from the unstable tree into the
stable tree. I also synced them into the fink CVS module, but don't
have time to do a bootstrap right now. I'll do that ASAP (maybe
tomorrow), but if anybody finds the time to try it, please do so.
I hope I didn't break bootstrap,
401 - 500 of 906 matches
Mail list logo
