Re: [Fink-devel] xrootd4 links to system-openssl

Hi Hanspeter, thanks for tracking this down. I have very little time at the moment. Would you mind to commit these changes to xrootd4? Thanks a lot, Remi > On 27 Mar 2017, at 3:50 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser > wrote: > > Remi, > > xrootd4 links to the

Re: [Fink-devel] root5-5.34.30-1

Hi Jack, thanks for the updated version. Indeed, both pythia packages pythia8-shlibs and root-pythia-shlibs fail the validator test. They need to be built with flat_namespace due to the inclusion of Fortran code. How can this be made known to the validator? Thanks, Remi On 04 May 2015, at

[Fink-devel] llvm-gcc42 conflicts with ccache-default

Hi, I try to install llvm-gcc42-2336.11-107 on 10.8.5. However, the installation fails due to a conflict with ccache-default-3.1.9-1: Selecting previously deselected package llvm-gcc42. (Reading database ... 140972 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking llvm-gcc42 (from

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] 10.9 beta support

Hi, On Oct 27, 2013, at 8:46 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: We've added support for 10.9 into the master branch of the github repository (https://github.com/fink/fink). Folks that were using the Futureproof2 feature branch may want to update their git checkouts

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] 10.9 beta support

Hi, On Oct 28, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Daniel Johnson daniel.johnso...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 28, 2013, at 5:58 AM, Remi Mommsen remigius.momm...@cern.ch wrote: Hi, On Oct 27, 2013, at 8:46 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: We've added support for 10.9

Re: [Fink-devel] Fail install gcc48 and root5 on 10.9

Hi, the latest released root5 version does not yet compile on 10.9. A new upstream version should be out soon. However, I haven't updated to 10.9 yet. Thus, it might be a while before I can work on it. Remi On Oct 25, 2013, at 5:20 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: On

Re: [Fink-devel] New functionality in fink master

Hi, On Apr 13, 2012, at 12:34 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: I've just added code from Daniel Johnson which changes the default behavior of fink in git master. --build-as-nobody is now the default option. It can be overridden in a .info file by the use of a BuildAsNobody: false field. And

[Fink-devel] Buildconflict not working for xft2-dev

Hi, I'd like to add a buildconflict on xft2-dev to my root5 package on 10.7 (c.f. the thread fink-users 'root5 compilation fails on 10.7'). However, when doing so, I get the following error message from fink when it tries to temporally remove xft2-dev: The following package will be rebuilt:

Re: [Fink-devel] Buildconflict not working for xft2-dev

Hi Alexander, On Jan 21, 2012, at 7:04 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/21/12 11:38 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, I'd like to add a buildconflict on xft2-dev to my root5 package on 10.7 (c.f. the thread fink-users 'root5 compilation fails

Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/utils clamav.info, NONE, 1.1

Hi, On Jul 26, 2011, at 8:21 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/26/11 1:24 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/utils In directory vz-cvs-3.sog:/tmp/cvs-serv27852 Added Files: clamav.info Log

Re: [Fink-devel] Uniform description for obsolete packages?!

Hi, On Apr 26, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Max Horn wrote: Am 18.04.2011 um 17:49 schrieb Daniel Macks: On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:50:40 0200, Max Horn wrote: Am 18.04.2011 um 14:49 schrieb Max Horn: OK... anybody opposed? To summarize, this are the changes I propose, each should be trivial to

Re: [Fink-devel] Build issue with anjuta-2.24.2-2 on 10.5.8

Hi Dan, On Sep 30, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:52:14 -0400, Daniel Macks wrote: On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:49:06 0200, Remi Mommsen wrote: On Sep 27, 2010, at 8:08 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: On 9/27/10 1:58 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: (Tested

Re: [Fink-devel] Build issue with anjuta-2.24.2-2 on 10.5.8

Hi, On Sep 27, 2010, at 8:08 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: On 9/27/10 1:58 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 (Tested on 10.5.8/PowerPC, Xcode 3.1.4, Xquartz 2.5.3) Looks like another case of .la files hiding a multitude of sins: ...

[Fink-devel] gcc44 to stable?

Hi, I learned from the commit messages (see below) that packages in stable using gcc43 cannot be used on x86_64. I have gcc44 version for all of my packages in unstable, but I cannot move them as gcc44 is not yet stable. Any plans to promote gcc44 to stable? Thanks, Remi On Aug

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc43 vs. gcc44

Hi Bill, On Jul 17, 2009, at 7:17 AM, William G. Scott wrote: Hi Citizens: A number of packages, including fftw, depend on gcc43 instead of gcc44, which leads to the rather time-consuming and blood-pressure- elevating phenomenon of having not one but two interminable builds for packages that

Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome libgdl-1.0.info, NONE, 1.1 libgdl1.0.info, 1.4, 1.5

Hi Dan, there's now also a revision 1.2 in my experimental tree which merges your changes with mine. Remi On Nov 5, 2008, at 11:12 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi Dan, the public gdl-gnome shared library is present up to 2.23.90 inclusive. I have a libgdl1.0 package in my CVS experimental

[Fink-devel] Anjuta, gnome-build, and update to libgdl1.0

Hi, I finally managed to package anjuta (http://anjuta.org) for fink. This required a new package for gnome-build and an update to the existing libgdl1.0 package (from 0.7.11 to 2.23.90). As these are my first packages within the gnome framework, I'd appreciate if you could look at them

[Fink-devel] gnome-build-1.0 not found (pangocairo)

Hi, I try to compile anjuta (http://anjuta.org) on my Mac running 10.5.3. I'm using the latest packages from the pangocairo branch. I found all dependencies except for the gnome-build-1.0 package (providing the 'gnome-build-1.0.pc'). Do you know which package provides this file/

Re: [Fink-devel] cernlib and gcc43

Hi Bill, On Apr 15, 2008, at 6:21 PM, William Scott wrote: I seem to have successfully compiled the cernlib stuff with gcc43 (I just did a global sudo perl -pi -e 's|gcc42|gcc43|g' *.info in unstable/sci ). but don't know how to test it: New package:

[Fink-devel] __ctype_b_loc on Mac OS X

Hi, I try to compile code developed on Linux on Mac OS X. It fails due to the missing symbol __ctype_b_loc (http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.0.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB- Core-generic/baselib---ctype-b-loc.html). It is not part of ctype.h on Mac OS X (10.4/10.3), nor can I find it

Re: [Fink-devel] Shlibs field and variants

Hi Dan, On Jun 5, 2007, at 8:59 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 07:19:47PM -0500, Remi Mommsen wrote: Thanks for implementing this feature. I gave it a try and it seems to mostly work. There is an issue with the validation when running with 'fink -m' when it comes

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc4 package obsolete?

Hi Dan, On Jun 4, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:25:32AM -0500, Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, Given that we have now gcc42 in 10.4/unstable (and soon also in 10.4/ stable), I wonder if we should declare the gcc4 package as obsolete. The gcc4 package in 10.4

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc4 package obsolete?

Hi, On Jun 4, 2007, at 3:50 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: On Jun 4, 2007, at 1:44 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi Dan, On Jun 4, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:25:32AM -0500, Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, Given that we have now gcc42 in 10.4/unstable (and soon

Re: [Fink-devel] pushing gcc42 into fink 10.4 stable

Hi, On May 24, 2007, at 11:04 AM, William Scott wrote: Date: 2007-05-21 16:31:50 GMT (2 days, 23 hours and 26 minutes ago) Now that gcc 4.2.0 has been officially released I think it is time to move the gcc42 package from fink 10.4 unstable into stable. Can someone please do that after

Re: [Fink-devel] Shlibs field and variants

Hi Dan, On May 7, 2007, at 10:06 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 08 May 2007, at 04:53, Daniel Macks wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 05:51:04PM -0500, Remi Mommsen wrote: I guess it wouldn't be too difficult to extend the variant syntax to the Shlibs field. Is there any show-stopper

Re: [Fink-devel] Shlibs field and variants

Hi Dan, On May 7, 2007, at 2:43 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 08:39:53PM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: On May 6, 2007, at 9:09 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote: I have a package (root5) which builds many shlibs and has different variants. Depending on the variant, some shlibs

[Fink-devel] Shlibs field and variants

Hi, I have a package (root5) which builds many shlibs and has different variants. Depending on the variant, some shlibs are built or not. So far, I just listed all possibly built libraries in the Shlibs field. The latest (cvs head) version of fink complains now about the missing libraries

Re: [Fink-devel] Shlibs field and variants

Hi David, On May 6, 2007, at 10:39 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: On May 6, 2007, at 9:09 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, I have a package (root5) which builds many shlibs and has different variants. Depending on the variant, some shlibs are built or not. So far, I just listed all possibly

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 mixed result

Hi, On Jan 27, 2007, at 10:10 PM, David Fang wrote: Hi, First of all, thank you again, Jack, for putting forth an unrelenting effort in packaging up gcc-4.2 (prerelease), I've been following along for months now. I have some good news and bad news to report. The good news first:

[Fink-devel] Expansion of %n in case of variants: Fink 0.26.0 vs HEAD

Hi, I'm using the following lines for a variantified package: Package: cernlib2005-%type_pkg[fortran] Type: fortran (g77 gfortran) Patch: patch -p1 %a/%n.patch I use as type 'g77' and 'gfortran', not '-g77' and '-gfortran' deviating form the proposed form in the package manual. However, I

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc4 4.2 test packaging

Hi Jack, On Oct 26, 2006, at 1:13 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: David, I think we should be able to get this to work with... --- gcc4.info 2006-10-26 10:17:56.0 -0400 +++ /sw/fink/10.4/local/main/finkinfo/gcc4.info 2006-10-26 10:15:52.0 -0400 @@ -20,6 +20,10 @@

Re: [Fink-devel] New Build Results

Hi Matthew, On Mar 21, 2006, at 10:42 PM, Matthew Sachs wrote: New buildfink data are up. http://fink.opendarwin.org/build/2006-03-09/ppc/out/report.html http://fink.opendarwin.org/build/2006-03-09/i386/out/report.html There are some new categories which should make some types of failure

Re: [Fink-devel] CVS chill over

Hi Koen, On Feb 18, 2006, at 3:04 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote: On Feb 18, 2006, at 2:25 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: The 10.4 tree is based on the state of the 10.4-transitional tree on January 20, the day the chill began. Some of the more recent changes were transferred over, but

Re: [Fink-devel] Don't use /sw/fink/dists when symlinking debs from /sw/fink/debs

Hi, On Feb 4, 2006, at 12:09 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, On Feb 3, 2006, at 2:18 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, I'm switching btw the 10.4-transitional and 10.4 tree by setting a symlink from /sw to the 2 fink directories having the 10.4- transitional and 10.4

Re: [Fink-devel] Don't use /sw/fink/dists when symlinking debs from /sw/fink/debs

Hi, On Feb 3, 2006, at 2:18 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, I'm switching btw the 10.4-transitional and 10.4 tree by setting a symlink from /sw to the 2 fink directories having the 10.4- transitional and 10.4 distributions active, respectively. I also linked the /sw

[Fink-devel] Don't use /sw/fink/dists when symlinking debs from /sw/fink/debs

Hi, I'm switching btw the 10.4-transitional and 10.4 tree by setting a symlink from /sw to the 2 fink directories having the 10.4- transitional and 10.4 distributions active, respectively. I also linked the /sw/fink/debs directory btw the 2 directories to avoid rebuilding debs already

[Fink-devel] gnome-system-monitor-2.6.0-1015 fails in 10.4 tree

Hi, I'm not sure if error reports on the 10.4 tree are premature. But here we go: I try to build gnome-system-monitor-2.6.0-1015, but it fails. I have gtk+2* 2.6.10-1 installed. gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DPROCMAN_DATADIR=\/sw/share/ procman/\ -DDATADIR=\/sw/share\ -DXTHREADS

[Fink-devel] Switch of prebinding

Hi, I have a problem with dynamic unloading libraries and suspect that it involves the prebinding used by fink, as if I compile the package outside of fink, the problem does not show up. Anyway, which is the correct/best way to switch off the prebinding for a fink package? TIA, Remi

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Providing default /sw/var/lib/debfoster/keepers with base-files package?

Hi, On Jan 21, 2005, at 4:01 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:57:23AM -0500, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: On Jan 20, 2005, at 8:02 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: If a user is not carfull the system might end up unusable due to e.g. a missing apt while running with UseBinaryDist. That's not an

[Fink-devel] Re: Providing default /sw/var/lib/debfoster/keepers with base-files package?

Hi, On Jan 20, 2005, at 6:47 AM, Christian Schaffner wrote: Dear Fink Developers We recommend more and more often to use the debfoster fink package to keep track of unneeded packages on a Fink installation. One problem that users are facing with debfoster is that it asks to remove too many

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci root-pythia.info,1.1,1.2

Maintainer: Remi Mommsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almosthttp://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt

[Fink-devel] License question

Hi, I'm packing a small utility for checking symlinks. The only information concerning copyright is '(c) Mark Lord, freely distributable'. I'm not sure on which license type this maps best. Thanks for your advice. Cheers, Remi

Re: [Fink-devel] Rsync not being updated

Hi Martin, On Aug 19, 2004, at 4:17 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Martin Costabel wrote: [] Yes, I think it is a bug in the new fink. In SelfUpdate.pm, the line next unless ($tree =~ /stable/); was changed to next unless ($tree eq stable or $tree eq unstable); But $tree is typically

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/sci roofitcore.info,1.3,1.4 roofitcore.patch,1.1,1.2 roofitmodels.info,1.3,1.4 roofitmodels.patch,1.1,1.2

Hi Dave, Yep, will happen shortly. Cheers, Remi On Aug 13, 2004, at 11:05 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: On Aug 13, 2004, at 1:36 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/sci In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv9005 Modified

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: BuildDependsOnly

Hi, On Jun 18, 2004, at 12:20 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: One of my goals here is to have an automated way to verify that packages are complying with the BuildDependsOnly policy. So I'm trying to find ways of characterizing this which won't get into a lot of exceptions. Right now (using CVS

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/devel findbugs.info,1.3,1.4 findbugs.patch,1.1,NONE

Hi, On Apr 19, 2004, at 8:40 AM, Christian Schaffner wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/devel In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv7155/10.3/stable/main/ finkinfo/devel Modified Files: findbugs.info Removed Files: findbugs.patch Log Message:

Re: [Fink-devel] updating a package

Hi, On Apr 19, 2004, at 12:30 PM, eecue wrote: Hello All, Some time ago i released the following package: http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/nat I would like to update it so it is included in the current version of fink or at least in the unstable tree of the current version. is

Re: [Fink-devel] More issues with variants

Hi Dan, On Apr 11, 2004, at 1:14 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 06:02:09PM -0700, Remi Mommsen wrote: Package: roofitcore-%type_pkg[root_version] Type: root_version (root3 root4) Depends: %type_raw[root_version] SplitOff: Package: %N-shlibs Description: Shared libs

[Fink-devel] More issues with variants

Hi, I'm in progress updating the roofitcore package which already exists in two flavors roofitcore depending on package root3 and roofitcore4 depending on root4. This naming is inconsistent and not quite right, as the name roofitcore4 implies that roofitcore is in version 4. However, it is

[Fink-devel] Variant test for block of dependencies

Hi, I'm trying to figure out how to use the variant system. I'd like to use it for roofitcore package, where the essential difference between roofitcore and roofitcore4 is the depenency on the root version (root3 or root4). I'd like to have a statement similar to Depends: %N-shlibs

Re: [Fink-devel] Variant test for block of dependencies

Hi Dan, On Apr 8, 2004, at 11:07 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 10:30:18AM -0700, Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, I'm trying to figure out how to use the variant system. I'd like to use it for roofitcore package, where the essential difference between roofitcore and roofitcore4

[Fink-devel] node for db42-ssl-shlibs already exists when installing lilypond

Hi, There is a recent thread about the 'node already exists problem' at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.general/13071 During the update of lilypond I run into the same problem. I noticed that each time it's db42-ssl-shlibs which has to be forced removed. In addition I noticed that

Re: [Fink-devel] Where to find downloaded patches?

Hi Beat, On Mar 5, 2004, at 2:44 AM, Beat Birkhofer wrote: Hi egrep -i -r '^Source.*(diff|patch)$' * indicates that my package easytag is perhaps the only one downloading it's patches. At least the xv package in the unstable trees 10.2-gcc3.3 and 10.3 is downloading its patch, too. Thought

[Fink-devel] Package search broken

Hi, I just noted that the package DB search on the website is broken. Whatever search string you enter in the search field is replaced by 'mailing-lists'. I guess that this broke with the new i18n website (cool by the way). Cheers, Remi

Re: [Fink-devel] binary release plans

Hi Dave, On Feb 27, 2004, at 6:47 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: I plan to start creating a binary release for 10.3 in about a week. If you are aware of any of your packages in the 10.3/stable tree which are *not* suitable for binary release, please either fix them or remove them from that

[Fink-devel] Re: fink/mirror ChangeLog,1.50,1.51 rsync,1.9,1.10 master,1.12,1.13

Hi Darian, On Feb 23, 2004, at 1:32 AM, Darian Lanx wrote: Index: rsync === RCS file: /cvsroot/fink/fink/mirror/rsync,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -d -r1.9 -r1.10 --- rsync 24 Jan 2004 18:30:59

Re: [Fink-devel] submitting large patches

Hi Ben, On Feb 15, 2004, at 11:55 AM, Ben Hines wrote: On Feb 14, 2004, at 11:49 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: I don't know how you count, but I see 149 patch files in 10.2-gcc3.3 and 10.3 (both stable and unstable) which are above 30k. Sounds pretty low to me... under 1 percent since you're

[Fink-devel] Packaging policy

Hi Dan et al., Your clarifications in the packaging sections reminded me of the following issue which I have in mind since quite some time: I prefer the here-doc structure for Depends and BuildDepends in fink packages, where each dependency (with possible alternatives) is on a separate line.

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11 xv.info,1.3,1.4 xv.patch,1.1,1.2

Hi Dan, On Feb 12, 2004, at 9:09 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] committed: RCS file: /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11/xv.info,v +xv is an interactive image manipulation program for the X Window System. It can operate on images in the GIF, JPEG, TIFF, PBM, PGM,

Re: [Fink-devel] fink feature request: finicky-install

Hi Joe, On Feb 3, 2004, at 4:28 PM, Joe Corneli wrote: For the finicky fink user, it would be nice to be able to inspect and modify the configuration options at build time - so something like % fink finicky-install lynx-ssl These options will be passed to configure: --enable-nls

Re: [Fink-devel] fwbuilder, Panther, dl errors

Hi, What command to you use for linking fwbuilder? What gives 'otool -L fwbuilder'? Check that all libraries listed by otool exists at these places. HTH, Remi On Jan 23, 2004, at 3:37 PM, Vadim Zaliva wrote: Hi! I am maintainer of Firewall Builder (www.fwbuilder.org). We have the

[Fink-devel] New scripts for binary distribution

Hi, I created a new version of scripts to build a binary distribution for fink. They can be found in the cvs module scripts/bindist in the branch 'remis-bindist'. I believe that these scripts ease the creation of binary distributions considerably. A private binary distribution for the

[Fink-devel] Perl modules ambiguity with xml-parser-pm581-2.34-10

Hi, I tried to build xml-parser-pm581-2.34-10 on 10.3 (stable tree, but the same is true AFAIK for the unstable tree). xml-parser-pm581-2.34-10 depends on libwww-pm, which pulls in libwww-pm580. libwww-pm580 depends itself on unversioned perl modules: Depends: perl581-core |

Re: [Fink-devel] bin-dist made more regularely

Hi Dave et al., I pick up the thread here. As you might have seen, I committed the first version of the new bindist scripts to cvs. I used the branch 'remis-bindist' for the scripts module. The scripts are documented in a new README and the HOWTO reflects the changes. I'd be glad if some

Re: [Fink-devel] Depends -dylib version compatibility (was dists/10.2-gcc3.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci root3-cernlib.info,1.2,1.3 root3-threaded.info,1.7,1.8 root3.info,1.5,1.6 root3.patch,1.4,1.5)

it? Cheers, Remi On Dec 19, 2003, at 1:05 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Remi Mommsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Index: root3-cernlib.info === RCS file: /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.2-gcc3.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci/root3

Re: [Fink-devel] bin-dist made more regularely

Hi Ben, On Dec 16, 2003, at 1:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: David R. Morrison wrote: There are a few other tweaks which are necessary as well. Fink is not very smart about specifying the default choice, and in the automated system, we always take the default choice. For this reason, I

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.2-gcc3.3/stable/main/finkinfo/database mysql-3.23.58-11.info,1.4,NONE mysql-3.23.58-11.patch,1.1,NONE

Hi Dave, does this mean that mysql-dev and mysql-shlibs are no longer available in 10.2-gcc3.3/stable? If so I'll have to revise my root3 packages in stable. Cheers, Remi On Dec 19, 2003, at 3:06 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Update of

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.2-gcc3.3/stable/main/finkinfo/database mysql-3.23.58-11.info,1.4,NONE mysql-3.23.58-11.patch,1.1,NONE

/mysql.patch ?-/ Remi On Dec 19, 2003, at 4:21 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: No, mysql-4.0.5-11 is still there... -- Dave Remi Mommsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Dave, does this mean that mysql-dev and mysql-shlibs are no longer available in 10.2-gcc3.3/stable? If so I'll have to revise my

Re: [Fink-devel] bin-dist made more regularely

Hi Ben, On Dec 19, 2003, at 4:31 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: Remi Mommsen wrote: If I have a choice of system-xfree86 xfree86 xfree86-base and my regex excludes system-xfree86 I end up with a matchcount of 2. Thus nothing is done and I end up with all three choices. Thus I have to trim

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.2-gcc3.3/stable/main/finkinfo/database mysql-3.23.58-11.info,1.4,NONE mysql-3.23.58-11.patch,1.1,NONE

Sorry, maybe I'm blind (not to be excluded), but 10.2-gcc3.3/stable/main/finkinfo/database/mysql.info: Package: %N12-shlibs just provides mysql12-shlibs and no longer mysql-shlibs. Cheers, Remi On Dec 19, 2003, at 5:42 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Daniel Macks said: David R.

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg-bootstrap cannot be built due to missing gettext-dev

Hi, So the consensus is to remove dpkg-bootstrap from the package tree? I'll do it tomorrow (PST) if nobody shouts... Cheers, Remi On Dec 16, 2003, at 4:36 PM, TheSin wrote: I didn't even know it's in the tree but I don't think it should be. --- TS http://southofheaven.org

Re: [Fink-devel] Old style package name with epoch 0

Hi Peter, On Dec 15, 2003, at 5:36 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Remi Mommsen wrote: | | | Well, I don't really use the information from the package name, | otherwise I would have problems with the new convention anyway. I just | have a kind of lazy

[Fink-devel] openssl in 10.3/stable/main/finkinfo

Hi, I noticed that the info and patch file for openssl is found in 10.3/stable/main/finkinfo which are identical to 10.3/unstable/crypto/finkinfo, but differ from the 10.3/stable/crypto version. I guess this is a mistake that openssl for 10.3/stable is in the main branch and not in crypto.

Re: [Fink-devel] bin-dist made more regularely

Hi Dave, On Dec 12, 2003, at 2:16 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Hi Remi. As Ben Reed pointed out, our biggest problem in setting up more frequent bindists is getting the system fully automated. In fact, as of now, only three people have ever made full bindists, and its only a partially

[Fink-devel] Old style package name with epoch 0

Hi, I started improving the scripts for the bindist. More on this later. While working on the scripts, I came across the following problem: there are a few packages which still use the old naming scheme foo-1.2-1. This is fine as long as these files do not define an epoch. However for two

Re: [Fink-devel] Old style package name with epoch 0

Hi Ben, On Dec 14, 2003, at 4:37 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, I started improving the scripts for the bindist. More on this later. While working on the scripts, I came across the following problem: there are a few packages which still use the old naming scheme foo-1.2-1

Re: [Fink-devel] bin-dist made more regularely

://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Remi Mommsen Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Fink-devel] bin-dist made more regularely Dear developers, I have some questions concerning the binary

[Fink-devel] bin-dist made more regularely

Dear developers, I have some questions concerning the binary distributions. Please forgive me if those have been covered elsewhere, but I haven't found much information about it. 1. What is the idea to have a current and a release distribution? 2. Why does the current distribution not include

Re: [Fink-devel] openmotif3 install question

Hi again, and on second check I find /sw/include/Xm/Xm.h also in openmotif3_2.2.2-5_darwin-powerpc.deb. Cheers, Remi On Dec 6, 2003, at 6:43 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, I find my Xm.h in /sw/include/Xm/Xm.h and $ dlocate -S /sw/include/Xm/Xm.h lesstif: /sw/include/Xm/Xm.h

[Fink-devel] Reinstall of tetex-base destroys texmf-local/ls-R

Hi Dave, I just updated the tetex-base package. That worked well. However, I noticed that in this process a new (virgin) ls-R was installed in /sw/etc/texmf.local. Therefore I needed to run mktexlsr to regain access to the installed packages in texmf.local. Could this be added to the

Re: [Fink-devel] Update findbugs

Hi, Okay, done. Cheers, Remi On Wednesday, November 26, 2003, at 04:45 PM, Rohan Lloyd wrote: findbugs: 0.6.0-2 10.2/stable/devel, 10.2-gcc3.3/stable/devel, 10.3/stable/devel, 10.3/unstable/devel 0.6.6-1 10.2-gcc3.3/unstable/devel 0.7.0-1

[Fink-devel] package clhep for 10.3 - was Re: [Fink-beginners] clhep again Panther/FinkCommander

(Matt Stephenson), got no answer, and clhep is still absent from the Fink distribution now. I received a CC-ed mail from Remi Mommsen (thanks Remi) to Matt Stephenson, where Remi said: I was just wondering why clhep does not exists in 10.2-gcc3.3 and 10.3. I copied the info file from the 10.2

Re: [Fink-devel] package clhep for 10.3 - was Re: [Fink-beginners] clhep again Panther/FinkCommander

. -Ben On Nov 21, 2003, at 9:56 AM, TheSin wrote: Matt is still around though he might not have 10.3 access, if you can get it to 10.3 and put it on the tracker I'm sure he won't mind. -Justin On 21-Nov-03, at 10:46 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote: [Moved this message to fink-devel from fink

Re: [Fink-devel] How do I submit a new port?

Hi George, Welcome to the club of package maintainers. You can submit your package at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=414256group_id=17203 . You'll have to register with sourceforge (for free of course). It will then be reviewed by the developers. Cheers, Remi On

[Fink-devel] ncurses 'backport' from 10.3 tree

Hi, I just noticed that the ncurses 5.3-12 available in 10.2-gcc3.3 does not support prebinding. A couple packages depending on ncurses are therefore not prebound, either. I copied the version 5.3-20031018-2 available in the 10.3 tree to the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree and it works flawlessly (as far as

[Fink-devel] clhep for gcc 3.3

Hi Matt, I was just wondering why clhep does not exists in 10.2-gcc3.3 and 10.3. I copied the info file from the 10.2 tree to the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree and it compiles flawlessly. I haven't tried it yet with 10.3. Any known issues why it shouldn't work? Cheers, Remi

Re: [Fink-devel] Script to change emails

Hi, I'd try it with the rpl (RePLace) command available from fink package rpl. See 'man rpl' for details. HTH, Remi On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 11:04 PM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi everyone! Does anyone have a script that would allow me to change the email listed in each of the

Re: [Fink-devel] problems with g77 3.4 segmentation faults

Hi Jeff, I tried your new g77 3.3.2 on 10.3 with cernlib. cernlib builds fine, but the test fails as it was the case with 3.3(.1) (see our email exchange from Jul 17, 2003). With the g77 3.4-20031015 it works flawlessly. Thanks for your effort. Remi On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 04:43

Re: [Fink-devel] Depend on system-xfree86

: Remi Mommsen wrote: Dear Developers, I have the following problem with the sci/root3-threaded package in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree. I need an explicitly thread enabled xfree86. Therefore I have the following depends in the info file: Depends: ... , xfree86-base-threaded | xfree86 | system-xfree86

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDepends problem with fink 0.14

Hi Dave, Sorry for the late answer. I was away from my email for a week. I was using both releases 0.14.0 and 0.14.2 and just tried it with 0.15.0 with the same result. Cheers, Remi On Wednesday, October 15, 2003, at 12:52 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: I have a problem with

[Fink-devel] BuildDepends problem with fink 0.14

Hi, I have a problem with BuildDepends since using fink 0.14.X. I have two packages A and B. Package A does not Depend/BuildDepend on B, but B has both a Depend and BuildDepend on A. If I do 'fink build A B' (neither A nor B is installed), it builds first package A and creates the deb file.

[Fink-devel] Policy regarding 10.2, 10.2-gcc3.3, and 10.3 trees

Dear developers, I'm updating some of my fink packages (first of all sci/root3). It is not clear to me how I should handle the package updates and submissions for the different trees. Is it mandatory to have the same package versions in both 10.2 and 10.2-gcc3.3 tree? If I would like to move

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc3.3 tree open for business

Hi, I took the plunge over the week-end and upgraded my test machine to gcc 3.3 (and mac os 10.2.8). Everything so far went smoothly, thought I haven't recompiled everything yet. Thanks a lot for your great work. However, I have two observations concerning inject.pl: - The fink package get

Re: [Fink-devel] Some issues trying to compile qcad-2.0.0.8

Hi, The file qmacstyle_mac.h is in qt3-doc (obviously ;-). Cheers, Remi On Monday, October 6, 2003, at 06:24 PM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi, I'm trying to update the qcad package to 2.0.0.8, but I've run into a problem while trying to compile it: c++ -c -pipe -fno-common -fPIC

Re: [Fink-devel] Some issues trying to compile qcad-2.0.0.8

, at 06:34 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, The file qmacstyle_mac.h is in qt3-doc (obviously ;-). Cheers, Remi On Monday, October 6, 2003, at 06:24 PM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi, I'm trying to update the qcad package to 2.0.0.8, but I've run into a problem while trying to compile it: c

Re: [Fink-devel] Status of cvs server problems?

? I haven't found any indication on their web page. Cheers, Remi On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 03:13 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, There has been a crash of the cvs backup server, see http://sourceforge.net/docman/ display_doc.php?docid

Re: [Fink-devel] Status of cvs server problems?

Hi, There has been a crash of the cvs backup server, see http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352group_id=1#cvs Currently the cvs browser still presents the status of about 6 days ago, i.e. the all files I checked are at least that old. Hopefully the backup server will be

[Fink-devel] Re: fatback-1.3-1 and cernlib-2002-2 conflict

Hi, I cc this to fink-devel, because I'm not sure how to proceed. On Friday, September 5, 2003, at 03:49 AM, Jean-Francois MERTENS wrote: Hi, I get : Unpacking cernlib (from .../cernlib_2002-2_darwin-powerpc.deb) ... dpkg - warning, overriding problem because --force enabled: trying to

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fatback-1.3-1 and cernlib-2002-2 conflict

solution. Cheers, Remi On Friday, September 5, 2003, at 11:16 AM, TheSin wrote: I'd recommend a more descriptive name ie: name yours fatmanback and there will no longer be a conflict. On 5-Sep-03, at 11:58 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote: To my understanding the update-alternatives should

Re: [Fink-devel] splitoff essential package feedback?

Hi Dave, For me the update went very smoothly. I haven't notice any problems. Thanks for your work. Cheers, Remi On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 01:15 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: I'd like to get some feedback on the splitoff versions of the essential packages bzip2, gettext,

  1   2   >