Re: [Fink-users] mozilla bus error

On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Martin Costabel wrote: Viv Kendon wrote: [] Some more information that might help...I noticed that some pages display incorrectly on the G5 server compared to the TiBook (both running the exact same binary built on the server). Screen-shots are here: G5 server: http://q

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla bus error

Viv Kendon wrote: [] Some more information that might help...I noticed that some pages display incorrectly on the G5 server compared to the TiBook (both running the exact same binary built on the server). Screen-shots are here: G5 server: http://quantum.leeds.ac.uk/~viv/moz-quince.jpg TiBook

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla bus error

On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Viv Kendon wrote: On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Viv Kendon wrote: On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Clemence Magnien wrote: On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:24:02AM +, Viv Kendon wrote: Is anyone else seeing bus errors from mozilla? Two minor revisions later i mozilla-browser 1.7.5-4

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla bus error

On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Viv Kendon wrote: On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Clemence Magnien wrote: On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:24:02AM +, Viv Kendon wrote: Is anyone else seeing bus errors from mozilla? Two minor revisions later i mozilla-browser 1.7.5-4 Mozilla - web browser mozilla-chat.

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla bus error

On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Clemence Magnien wrote: On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:24:02AM +, Viv Kendon wrote: Is anyone else seeing bus errors from mozilla? (mozilla-bin:3171): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_property_get(): length value has wrapped in calculation (did you pass G_MAXLONG?) This line is just a

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla bus error

On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:24:02AM +, Viv Kendon wrote: > Is anyone else seeing bus errors from mozilla? > > (mozilla-bin:3171): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_property_get(): > length value has wrapped in calculation (did you pass > G_MAXLONG?) > > This line is just a warning, mozilla still launches

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla crashes on startup

On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 01:37:01PM +0200, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 06:52:19AM +0200, Matthew Parry wrote: > > > > have you checked that all the dependencies are up to date? > > > > i had a different problem with the mozilla binary which was fixed when i > > upda

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla crashes on startup

On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 06:52:19AM +0200, Matthew Parry wrote: > > have you checked that all the dependencies are up to date? > > i had a different problem with the mozilla binary which was fixed when i > updated some library (whose name i've obviously forgotten). i guess when > the binary is com

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla crashes on startup

have you checked that all the dependencies are up to date? i had a different problem with the mozilla binary which was fixed when i updated some library (whose name i've obviously forgotten). i guess when the binary is compiled, the maintainer is assuming the latest versions of the dependencies..

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla crashes on startup

On Jun 10, 2005, at 1:33 PM, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek wrote: Hello I tried installing Mozilla (mozilla 1.7.5-1). Fink installed it very quickly, probably took all packages from binary distribution. Whe I start it a window appears. Mozilla starts loading the mozilla start page. When the thro

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla won't display bold text correctly

I tried Century Schoolbook, size 17, and still have no bold text. (I have no bold fonts with Michele's settings of course). I think I will try installing freetype2, as it seems the most relevants package making a difference between Michele's and mine (although I know nothing about fonts actually).

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla won't display bold text correctly

Le 1 févr. 2005, à 11:36, Martin Costabel a écrit : Michèle Garoche wrote: May also be related to freetype, but then I'm not a specialist, Martin? Unfortunately, having to fight with freetype all the time doesn't make me a specialist ;-) . And I am ashamed to say that on the present topic, I am

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla won't display bold text correctly

Michèle Garoche wrote: May also be related to freetype, but then I'm not a specialist, Martin? Unfortunately, having to fight with freetype all the time doesn't make me a specialist ;-) . And I am ashamed to say that on the present topic, I am in the camp of the "no bold" people. I tried a coupl

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla won't display bold text correctly

Le 1 févr. 2005, à 0:58, Hanspeter Niederstrasser a écrit : The catch, the font size needs to be at least 17 (I'm on a 20" Cinema Display) before I can see the bold. I'm on a 17". Resolution 1440*900. Actually, even with the default settings, bold is visible, but as I don't like the default ones,

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla won't display bold text correctly

On 31-Jan-05, at 6:58 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: Michèle Garoche wrote: Le 31 janv. 2005, à 16:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Thanks for the answer, but I don't think it has anything to do with fonts preference. I have tried several combinations of fonts and font sizes, with no effect. W

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla won't display bold text correctly

Michèle Garoche wrote: Le 31 janv. 2005, à 16:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Thanks for the answer, but I don't think it has anything to do with fonts preference. I have tried several combinations of fonts and font sizes, with no effect. Well, let's say I'm basic. Something related to fonts? apple

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla won't display bold text correctly

I also run Apple's X11, and I just installed applexystemfonts and restarted X, with no effect. Clemence. > > Le 31 janv. 2005, à 17:24, Hanspeter Niederstrasser a écrit : > >> Michèle wrote: >> Michèle, are you sure you're talking about Mozilla under X11? If so, >> which version of mozilla? And

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla won't display bold text correctly

Le 31 janv. 2005, à 17:24, Hanspeter Niederstrasser a écrit : Michèle wrote: Michèle, are you sure you're talking about Mozilla under X11? If so, which version of mozilla? And which flavor of X11 are you running? With all versions of Firefox since 0.9 under X11 that I have tested, I have not b

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla won't display bold text correctly

Le 31 janv. 2005, à 16:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Thanks for the answer, but I don't think it has anything to do with fonts preference. I have tried several combinations of fonts and font sizes, with no effect. Well, let's say I'm basic. Something related to fonts? applesystemfonts, or so? M

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla won't display bold text correctly

Michèle wrote: I used to have mozilla 1.5.1-1, which worked all right, and I updated to version 1.5.1-2 (latest binary available), and now all bold text appears as normal text, which is extremely frustrating. I tried to switch to the very latest version available, 1.7.5-1, and the problem is still

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla won't display bold text correctly

Thanks for the answer, but I don't think it has anything to do with fonts preference. I have tried several combinations of fonts and font sizes, with no effect. If your version of mozilla works, I think it may have something to do with another package that I should install or upgrade, but I have n

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla won't display bold text correctly

Le 29 janv. 2005, à 22:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Hi everyone, I used to have mozilla 1.5.1-1, which worked all right, and I updated to version 1.5.1-2 (latest binary available), and now all bold text appears as normal text, which is extremely frustrating. I tried to switch to the very lates

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla won't display bold text correctly

On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 11:09:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I apologise if this is the wrong list to post, or this is a > known problem (I've found no mention of it in the fink FAQ on > on the mozilla site). > > I used to have mozilla 1.5.1-1, which worked all right,

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla 1.7.2-2 freetype error

On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Martin Costabel wrote: Supposing that freetype is good for *something* besides annoying people with incompatible updates, there should be some drawback from this solution. Are there any visible font-rendering glitches? Haven't seen any difference both with and without freetype

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla 1.7.2-2 freetype error

On Dec 4, 2004, at 2:08 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Viv Kendon wrote: [] +ac_add_options --disable-freetype2 [] It does work, at least for me, and it works for firefox too. (I didn't try firefox without that line in the patch file.) Supposing that freetype is good for *something* besides annoying

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla 1.7.2-2 freetype error

Viv Kendon wrote: [] +ac_add_options --disable-freetype2 [] It does work, at least for me, and it works for firefox too. (I didn't try firefox without that line in the patch file.) Supposing that freetype is good for *something* besides annoying people with incompatible updates, there should be s

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla 1.7.2-2 freetype error

On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Viv Kendon wrote: Drat, I have a freetype sort of error with the latest mozilla (below, it's rather long...) 1.7.2-1 is installed and working fine, but I installed Xorg (in place of XFree864.4) since installing 1.7.2-1, so t

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla 1.7.2-2 freetype error

On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Viv Kendon wrote: Drat, I have a freetype sort of error with the latest mozilla (below, it's rather long...) 1.7.2-1 is installed and working fine, but I installed Xorg (in place of XFree864.4) since installing 1.7.2-1, so that may be the cause of the problem? This is a know

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla 1.7.2-2 freetype error

On Dec 3, 2004, at 3:41 AM, Viv Kendon wrote: Drat, I have a freetype sort of error with the latest mozilla (below, it's rather long...) 1.7.2-1 is installed and working fine, but I installed Xorg (in place of XFree864.4) since installing 1.7.2-1, so that may be the cause of the problem? I hav

Re: Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla fails to start "No running window found" ERROR

Thanks a lot. Yes your were right it takes forever to load. Also any reason why it takes this long to load? And to me mozilla-x11 seems to render pages much faster than safari or firefox. I am guessing this is due to the windowing manager, x11 seems a lot faster in most cases. Thanks again. On T

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla fails to start "No running window found" ERROR

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Amit Uttamchandani wrote: > I just installed mozilla and I can't seem to get it to run. When I try > to launch mozilla I get the error "No running window found." That message is just because when you start mozilla, it first checks whether it is running already (and if so, jus

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla fails to instal - tar error

I'm happy to report that mozilla-browser built successfully on the third attempt. Many thanks to Daniel Macks for his help. Alwyn --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your fr

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla fails to instal - tar error

On 19 Jul 2004, at 07:14, Daniel Macks wrote: As it does its thing, tar does some consistency-checking. Which failed, in this case:) So first, has it ever happened before, is it reproducible with mozilla (sorry it had to happen with such a large package), and does it affect other packages? This is

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla fails to instal - tar error

On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 06:54:46AM +0100, Alwyn wrote: > This is on a G4 with the latest operating system and the latest Fink. > > dpkg-deb -b root-mozilla-browser-1.5.1-1 > /sw/fink/dists/stable/crypto/binary-darwin-powerpc > dpkg-deb: building package `mozilla-browser' in > `/sw/fink/dists/s

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla fails to build

Joe Corneli wrote: Please advise. variable nsFreeType.cpp:974: error: `request_data' undeclared (first use this function) nsFreeType.cpp:977: error: `aFace' undeclared (first use this function) nsFreeType.cpp:979: warning: invalid conversion from `int (*)(...)' to `int' nsFreeType.cpp:982: error

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla hasn't compiled for some time

On Jan 23, 2004, at 12:58 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Rob Braun wrote: Yeah, I had this exact same error while building mozilla 1.5.1. I just verified that it was freetype that caused the error. If I remove freetype{,-dev,shlibs}, it builds. If I install them, it doesn't. The -shlibs package shou

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla hasn't compiled for some time

Rob Braun wrote: Yeah, I had this exact same error while building mozilla 1.5.1. I just verified that it was freetype that caused the error. If I remove freetype{,-dev,shlibs}, it builds. If I install them, it doesn't. The -shlibs package should not interfere, I hope. Otherwise this would be pre

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla hasn't compiled for some time

Yeah, I had this exact same error while building mozilla 1.5.1. I just verified that it was freetype that caused the error. If I remove freetype{,-dev,shlibs}, it builds. If I install them, it doesn't. Rob On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:50:34PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > Erik Osheim wrote: > []

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla hasn't compiled for some time

On Jan 22, 2004, at 3:11 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: It built OK for me against XFree86. Are you using Apple's X11? Just to add a data point: I'm using Apple X11, and mozilla-1.5 builds and runs fine. Dave PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla hasn't compiled for some time

Erik Osheim wrote: [] It generates about 1000 lines of errors, which I can send the list but would rather not. Well, you might have sent one of them, this might have been useful :-) Since this mentions freetype, as a precaution you could at least remove the rettype or freetype-hinting packages i

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla hasn't compiled for some time

I am. Previously, I used XDarwin, but switched over to X11 at 10.3. However, since then I have compiled mozilla at least once (not sure how long ago). -- Erik On Jan 22, 2004, at 3:11 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: It built OK for me against XFree86. Are you using Apple's X11? -- Alexander Ha

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla hasn't compiled for some time

It built OK for me against XFree86. Are you using Apple's X11? -- Alexander Hansen Levitated Dipole Experiment http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX On Jan 22, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Erik Osheim wrote: Is anyone else seeing this? I've been trying to update mozilla for at least two weeks now (the version I had p

Removing Freetype (Was: Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla fails to compile)

At 6:22 PM +0100 1/11/04, Martin Costabel wrote: ...freetype and freetype-hinting are only installed because they were needed for building some packages. Afterwards they can be safely removed. The freetype2-hinting package is less harmful, it already is more or less empty. You can remove it, too

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla fails to compile

Jonathan Levi MD wrote: At 3:21 PM +0100 1/10/04, Martin Costabel wrote: Michèle Garoche wrote: [] i freetype-hinting 1.3.1-8 TrueType font Remove this one. It is only installed as a build time dependency and is harmful when it is left installed afterwards. Is that

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla fails to compile

At 3:21 PM +0100 1/10/04, Martin Costabel wrote: Michèle Garoche wrote: [] i freetype-hinting 1.3.1-8 TrueType font Remove this one. It is only installed as a build time dependency and is harmful when it is left installed afterwards. Is that true for all of us, withou

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla fails to compile

Thanks Eric and Martin, the freetype removing did the trick. Mozilla compiles. Michèle PGP.sig Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?=

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla fails to compile

Hi Eric, Le 10 janv. 2004, à 16:13, Eric Hoch a écrit : The experts may please correct me if I'm wrong but you may need the freetype library even if you work with Apple's X11 in order to fullfill the build depencies for packages depending on this library and which cannot use the Version comming wi

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla fails to compile

Hi Michèle, On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:26:19 +0100, Michèle Garoche wrote: >> I am not that an expert in reading error messages but it looks like >> something messed up with your freetype2 library. > I think that was some days ago when I reinstalled the whole fink > after clearing my disk. > I don't

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla fails to compile

Michèle Garoche wrote: [] i freetype-hinting 1.3.1-8 TrueType font Remove this one. It is only installed as a build time dependency and is harmful when it is left installed afterwards. -- Martin --- This SF.net

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla fails to compile

Hi Erich, Le 10 janv. 2004, à 12:00, Eric Hoch a écrit : Hi Michèle, On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:32:41 +0100, Michèle Garoche wrote: With the latest gnome 2.4 update, there are those errors in mozilla compilation (I've omitted a bunch because there are a huge numbers of errors): (snip) ### execu

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla still depends on xfree86-43

I had another go at this it looks like I actually didn't copy enough of the error message...this seems to be the crucial bit, right after untar'ing: sed 's|@PREFIX@|/sw|g' I spoke too soon (at least, I don't think this problem is > related to my last one, but mozilla is failing to build): > > Hop

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla still depends on xfree86-43

That sounds right--the explicit "xfree86" dependence is in mozilla-browser-xft2. What I believe happened is that your modified .info file vanished from Fink's knowledge when you switched trees, and you were left with a version that was copied over to the new tree, but still needs modification.

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla still depends on xfree86-43

I spoke too soon (at least, I don't think this problem is related to my last one, but mozilla is failing to build): Hope I got enough of the error message below. This is on a 12" TiBook with 10.2.8 and 10.2-gcc3.3 trees. I have sucessfully updated everything except mozilla and a handful of other

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla still depends on xfree86-43

OK, that works, though I have no idea why: the file I hacked is mozilla-browser-xft2-1.3-2.info, which is the version that is listed as outdated. The current version only has a file mozilla-1.3-12.info that contains no mention of xfree86, and I didn't touch it. Somehow the outdated info file is i

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla still depends on xfree86-43

You probably should do the same thing that you did before, then. Assuming that you copied the .info file to 10.2/local and then edited it, then you'd need to copy the file over to 10.2-gcc3.3/local (or 10.3/local) and run "fink index". On Tuesday, November 4, 2003, at 01:30 PM, Viv Kendon wrot

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla and Freetype error

I found I have applesystemfonts installed on my TiBook, so I installed mozilla-browser-xft2 there as well, and...I have fonts, found a very usable one (Kai) for Serif too. But I probably don't have all the fonts I should have, so I think I have still missed setting up something to do with my fonts

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla and Freetype error

On Thursday, September 18, 2003, at 10:50 AM, Viv Kendon wrote: OK, I tried this on my work system (G3 dual processor, software near identical to TiBook). This time I installed mozilla-browser-xft2 and everything else it wanted (after a couple of system-xfree86-43 tweaks). Now I don't have the zi

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla and Freetype error

OK, I tried this on my work system (G3 dual processor, software near identical to TiBook). This time I installed mozilla-browser-xft2 and everything else it wanted (after a couple of system-xfree86-43 tweaks). Now I don't have the zillions of font errors...but I also have no fonts, except Bitstre

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla and Freetype error

On Thursday, September 18, 2003, at 03:01 AM, Viv Kendon wrote: On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Viv Kendon wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Alexander Hansen wrote: On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 07:46 PM, Viv Kendon wrote: I just installed mozilla 1.3-2 from unstable crypto and when it started up the fir

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla and Freetype error

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Viv Kendon wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > > On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 07:46 PM, Viv Kendon wrote: > > > > > I just installed mozilla 1.3-2 from unstable crypto and when > > > it started up the first time I got a zillion errors like > > > >

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla and Freetype error

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 07:46 PM, Viv Kendon wrote: > > > I just installed mozilla 1.3-2 from unstable crypto and when > > it started up the first time I got a zillion errors like > > > > font /System/Library/Fonts/Geneva.dfont FreeType

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla and Freetype error

On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 07:46 PM, Viv Kendon wrote: I just installed mozilla 1.3-2 from unstable crypto and when it started up the first time I got a zillion errors like font /System/Library/Fonts/Geneva.dfont FreeType failed to open, error=19575472 And the fonts looked pretty awf

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla X11 and java?

I've pored over the documentation, and searched the web, but I can't figure out how to get java working in mozilla in X11? Can if be done? If so, would some kind soul please give me a pointer? I don't think it's possible. The only JDK available on MacOSX is Apple's, and it talks to Quartz, no

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla X11 and java?

On Monday, July 7, 2003, at 7:06PM, Kevin Horton wrote: I've pored over the documentation, and searched the web, but I can't figure out how to get java working in mozilla in X11? Can if be done? If so, would some kind soul please give me a pointer? I don't think it's possible. The only JDK av

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla Crashing

Alexander Hansen wrote: On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Thomas Hopper wrote: [] Mozilla will then crash (at least, it closes down), sometimes immediately, sometimes after a few minutes, with an error like: sw/bin/mozilla line 62: 28964 bus error &MOZ_PROGRAM ${1+"$@"} completely unrelated. Other people

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla Crashing

On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Thomas Hopper wrote: > I'm having trouble with Mozilla 1.1.0-4, Mac OS X 10.2.4, xfree86 4.2.1.1-3. > > I've checked the archives, and while it looks like others have had similar > problems, I don't see any fix. > > When starting Mozilla, I get the error: > > Gdk WARNING **: lo

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla plug-ins

The best way to go is contact package maintainer. I think it's Masanori Sekino ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), but you'd better check it out by "fink info mozilla". Cheers, Kow P.S., I agree that the Fink version of Mozilla runs faster than Carbonized one. This good. Payoff is that Fink's is still 1.1 a

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla compile failing

On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 03:09 PM, Isreal Packard wrote: I've installed the December developer tools. Same results. 2002? Not 2001? Still need more info, like versions of everything fink you have. And whether you have any GNU-Darwin corruption on your system. -Ben -

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla compile failing

I've installed the December developer tools. Same results. From: Ben Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Isreal Packard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla compile failing Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 19:56:02 -0800 On Sunday, Ja

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla compile failing

On Sunday, January 5, 2003, at 12:15 PM, Isreal Packard wrote: __Unwind_Resume Install the new dev tools (december 2002). -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla 1.1 under jaguar

What version (the entire number) are you trying? I've been using 1.1.0-4 with no problems (though I've had less problems with mozilla in general than others have, for some reason). On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 18:47, Hal Sadofsky wrote: > > White 600 Mhz iBook. I've been using fink for a few months, b

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla install :( -> XIE library missing...

On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 09:19:02AM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > Here's some further info (to muddy the waters): > > Oddly enough, I don't seem to have XIElib.h on my system, but mozilla > builds and runs fine. I'm using xfree86-base and -rootless-4.2.0-11 > > Also, comparing the other b

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla install :( -> XIE library missing...

I have a completely functional mozilla-1.0.0-1 that I built on my system. I just rebuilt it last night, so the process works for my current system setup. Here's some further info (to muddy the waters): Oddly enough, I don't seem to have XIElib.h on my system, but mozilla builds and runs fine.

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla install :( -> XIE library missing...

hi, i have the very same problem. since martin costabel provided me with a working .deb file, the problem seems to arise during compile time. i compared his (working) compile.log with mine and only found very few differences. the difference i found very strage is that he has the line checking

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla install :(

If it's causing trouble, you could try the Quartz OSX version that I've been using happily for a few weeks now. There's a MacOSX download link on their homepage: http://www.mozilla.org On Saturday, August 10, 2002, at 06:02 PM, Corey Van Allen wrote: > I am having an issue while trying to ins

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla install :(

On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Corey Van Allen wrote: > Unpacking replacement mozilla ... > Setting up mozilla (1.0.0-1) ... > Can not initialize XPCOM I kept getting that a couple of months ago when trying to upgrade the 0.9.9-x versions of Mozilla. Never did figure out what was triggering the bug, but s

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla 1.0.0 not in fink list

On Saturday, August 3, 2002, at 04:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Under unstable/crypto, there is no mozilla. I guess, either that > build got pulled, or I need to do something to get my local package > list updated. "fink index" does nothing. Any suggestions? > -Matt You need to run f

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla and psm

On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 02:13 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > The crypto branches of mozilla are 1.0rc3 and 1.0.0, both in unstable: > I believe there is no longer any "branch" of mozilla. It will be in crypto only from now on (once the unstable version is validated through user feedbac

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla and psm

The crypto branches of mozilla are 1.0rc3 and 1.0.0, both in unstable: [ldx3:~/Movies] hansen% locate mozilla | grep info ... /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/web/mozilla-0.9.8-1.info /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/web/mozilla-0.9.8-1.patch /sw/fink/dists/unstable/crypto/finkinfo/mozilla-

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla and psm

On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Matt Snyder wrote: > I built mozilla using fink, and whenever I try to go to a secure page, I > get the "document cannot be displayed unless you install the Personal > Security Manager" message. I had the impression that psm was > built/installed automatically, and that's wh

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla-1.0.0-1 and XPCOM

On Monday, July 1, 2002, at 12:29 PM, Kilian Koepsell wrote: > december 2001. Odd... that isn't supposed to happen with the December tools. It's a bug in an earlier version. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla-1.0.0-1 and XPCOM

december 2001. On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 12:25:34PM -0400, Alexander Strange wrote: > Subject: Re: [Fink-users] mozilla-1.0.0-1 and XPCOM > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Kilian Koepsell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: Alexander Strange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Mailer: Apple

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla-1.0.0-1 and XPCOM

On both machines (the workstation and the laptop) I used the December 2001 Developer tools. ADM On Monday, July 1, 2002, at 11:25 AM, Alexander Strange wrote: > > On Monday, July 1, 2002, at 12:07 PM, Kilian Koepsell wrote: > >> andrew, >> >> thaks a lot, i will try out your binary. >> >>

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla-1.0.0-1 and XPCOM

On Monday, July 1, 2002, at 12:07 PM, Kilian Koepsell wrote: > andrew, > > thaks a lot, i will try out your binary. > > however, it would be nice to resolve the problem. > > if somebody could send me a compile log of a working mozilla-1.0.0-1 (i > know, > it is huge), i could compile it again

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla-1.0.0-1 and XPCOM

compile time, one should be able to sort it out. cheers, kilian On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 10:58:54AM -0500, Andrew D. Martin wrote: > Subject: Re: [Fink-users] mozilla-1.0.0-1 and XPCOM > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Kilian Koepsell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Andrew D. Ma

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla-1.0.0-1 and XPCOM

I now have somewhat of a solution. I have compiled mozilla-1.0.0-1 on my laptop (Titanium 500) with no problems, and then moved my *.deb file up to my workstation (Dual G4 1000), installed it, and it works fine. Very strange. For others out there with the same problem, you can download the

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla-1.0.0-1 and XPCOM

hi, i have precisely the same problem but no solution yet. (i have reported it to this list already). cheers, kilian On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 04:17:40PM -0500, Andrew D. Martin wrote: > From: "Andrew D. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482) > Subjec

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla plug-ins

Jean-François Mertens wrote: > It is "unstable/crypto" that must be added. > > JFMertens > > > On Thursday, May 30, 2002, at 08:36 , Chris Devers wrote: > >> Roman Poeschl wrote: >> >>> Now a stupid question, how can one update from unstable (e.g. to >>> 0.9.9 or to your version) >>> I have ad

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla plug-ins

Hi there, Yes, after sometime of desperate search I have figured this out as well. Since approximately 1 1/2 mozilla 1.0rc3-1 and it's related libriaries are compiling. So, I keep fingers crossed. Anyway thanks for help and patience to the three of you. It's amazing to see how quick and nearly

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla plug-ins

It is "unstable/crypto" that must be added. JFMertens On Thursday, May 30, 2002, at 08:36 , Chris Devers wrote: > Roman Poeschl wrote: >> Now a stupid question, how can one update from unstable (e.g. to 0.9.9 >> or to your version) >> I have added 'unstable/main' to /etc/sw/fink.conf and di

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla plug-ins

If stable is before unstable, it may wind up taking priority. Here's my own Trees: line for reference: Trees: local/main unstable/main unstable/crypto stable/main stable/crypto Since I'm willing to commit to using unstable for everything that works for me. However, you may want to take a more

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla plug-ins

Alexander Hansen wrote: >My recollection is that the PSM was put in place at version 0.9.9 . I >have used mozilla to visit secured sites since that version, with no >problems (I'm running 1.0rc3 now). I installed from source, using the >unstable tree for everything. 0.9.8 is still the latest v

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla plug-ins

My recollection is that the PSM was put in place at version 0.9.9 . I have used mozilla to visit secured sites since that version, with no problems (I'm running 1.0rc3 now). I installed from source, using the unstable tree for everything. 0.9.8 is still the latest version one can get from sourc

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla failures

Marc Stergionis wrote: > (LIBGLADE ERROR): > > cc -I/sw/include/gnome-1.0 -DNEED_GNOMESUPPORT_H > -I/sw/lib/gnome-libs/include -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/glib-1.2 > -I/sw/lib/glib/include -I/sw/include/orbit-1.0 -I/sw/include/gtk-1.2 > -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/sw/include/gnome-xml -I./.. -c > li

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla failures

Sometime around 10:34 AM -0400 on 5/24/02, Alexander Hansen pounded out this ditty: >For the dselect problem: have you tried doing an 'apt-get update' like it >says? > >For the selfupdate-cvs problem: do you have the Developer Tools >installed? If not then you probably don't have cvs. > >In an

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla failures

For the dselect problem: have you tried doing an 'apt-get update' like it says? For the selfupdate-cvs problem: do you have the Developer Tools installed? If not then you probably don't have cvs. In any case, The binary and source distributions are independent. To update the binary package li

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla failures

You need to quote an actual error message--what you've sent shows up as the result of many different errors. Try looking further back in your output. -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University Levitated Dipole Experiment MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, 175 Alb

Re: [fink-users] mozilla build fails

there are two solutions, I'm testing one right now and it's in the info file, which is very easy. the other where i think the problem extends from is the FT package should be moved to %p/include/freetype/freetype which would fix it for all pkgs. But i'm testing things right now. [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [fink-users] mozilla build fails

I wrote a patch for this probrem and testing it now. If it successfully works, I'll put it into CVS. It will took one or more days. On 2002.05.18, at 00:17, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > Just that if the '-dev'-s co-exists, then when freetype2 is needed, > -I/sw/include/freetype2 should come b

Re: [fink-users] mozilla build fails

I give up for now: Now mozilla-1.0rc1 doesn't build any more either: c++ -o nsMacEventHandler.o -c -DOSTYPE=\"Darwin5.4\" -DOSARCH=\"Darwin\" -DOJI -I/Developer/Headers/FlatCarbon -F/System/Library/Frameworks -I../../../gfx/src/mac -I./../xpwidgets -I../../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../dist/i

  1   2   >