I'll be changing to a new e-mail address and am cancelling my
list subscriptions.
fop-user has instructions at the bottom of messages but
fop-dev doesn't.
I guess I'll have to read the web page.
here; AU because we got in first.
And the Austrians don'd call it Austria ... Isn't it Osterreich
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.run(Driver.java:565)
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
identities ?
My excuse is, I used that e-mail address years ago when I opened
my first Bugzilla account.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the Canadian Military were
suing a supplier about something as trivial nowadays as 8K of memory.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 17:53, J.Pietschmann wrote:
John Austin wrote:
I noticed this artcle on Developer Works:
Java theory and practice: Garbage collection and performance
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-jtp01274.html
Something to read on Thursday.
Nice read
I noticed this artcle on Developer Works:
Java theory and practice: Garbage collection and performance
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-jtp01274.html
Something to read on Thursday.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as some student
in netland and submit some provably proprietary code as original.
Six months later, MS sues Linus for malfeasance with the vigorous
support of Homeland Security ...
Of course, conspiracies never succeed for long. Some small fish
would rat them out.
--
John Austin [EMAIL
think value-of implies some kind of conversion ...
My reference is upstairs.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
instanceof 651
Very, very interesting...
When did the choice of JVM (java -client | java -server) appear ?
Wasn't it 1.3 ?
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
version 1.4.2
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2-b28)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2-b28, mixed mode)
H.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, he plays that faster than I can READ it ...
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 16:17, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
When I hear Bill Gates bragging about how his programmers can code up to 72
There's the world's richest hermit again.
Maybe he'll end up nuttier than Howard Hughes.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 08:49, J.Pietschmann wrote:
John Austin wrote:
(is Content-length: required for any reason other than placating
Acrobat and that rich hermit who lives outside Redmond WA ?)
Not really a FOP topic but anyway.
Setting content-length is considered good style
for potential users to have an out-of-box webapp that runs a
large number of our examples.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or twice since. [I stopped overnight in Lahr about 1978.]
As a Canadian I understand 'donut' (see http://www.timhortons.com/) but
I always think of brotchen as a German pastry.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, eh!
Anyway ... the former Molson's brewery in Barrie Ontario next
to Highway 400 (Interstate/Motorway/Autobahn) ... had everything
they needed ... huge metal kettles ... loading docks ...
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for the XSL-FO
specification (RenderX) and I wanted to generate the XSL-FO
file for it, as a more appropriate 'challenge' for the project.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 21:11, Glen Mazza wrote:
It's probably not *yet* time to set 1.4 as the JDK to
code against for 1.0, but it probably wouldn't be much
of a disaster if we did so either.
Does a target-lock commitment like this require a vote ?
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2003-12-26 at 05:29, Peter Kullmann wrote:
J. Pietschmann wrote:
John Austin wrote:
RedHat 9.0 (my system anyhow) includes a command 'pdftopbm'
that will
convert a PDF to multiple PBM (protable Bit Map) files that might be
comparable.
...
It would certainly help
the side-by-side comparison ?
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
There are suggestions on the Net that Ghostcript can do this sort of
conversion as well.
GIMP can read a PDF as well. When I tried it, I got a graphic for every
pair of pages (my doc was over 133 pages). Perhaps some script-fu ... ?
regards,
finn
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-oriented angle but it's not that it's
called many times anyway. Do you think we should rename it?
As long as we are certain that it is being used correctly, probably
not necessary. Just jumped a bit when I saw the possibility that it
would be easily mis-used.
On 19.12.2003 13:13:45 John Austin
On 19.12.2003 13:57:26 John Austin wrote:
And of course, I missed the fact that the last method in the class
contains a pathological use. To get the name of this class, we create a
parser ?
/**
* Returns the fully qualified classname of the standard XML parser
for FOP
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 15:56, J.Pietschmann wrote:
I've got a lot of ideas myself, perhaps too many. What the
project needs is *working* *code*.
Amen!
[but a short one, not drawn out like the final chorus of Messiah!]
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
territory.
The discussions are lively and quite enlightening but they seem to
peter out or double back on themselves. I don't see any state
changes from Bugzilla indicating that anything is getting fixed
and my experience tells me that this is not healthy.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 06:25, J.Pietschmann wrote:
John Austin wrote:
It seems that the relative file reference ../graphics/page.gif is
computed by the program relative to the 'current directory' not
relative to the file: 'test/xml/bugtests/image.fo'.
I'm sure the spec has an opinion
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also decided to use the command line class for future
performance measurements.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 12:59, Finn Bock wrote:
I'm resending this mail since it hasn't yet shown up in the archives.
I'm sorry about any duplicates.
[John Austin]
4) Changed the handling of strings at the for-loop storing the
attributes received from the parser in startElement
objects, BorderAndPadding and especially FontInfo
come to mind, although there is more variation.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
implementation. I want to
be able to plug in a new Property implementation and test
it independantly of the rest of FOP.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 02:45, Glen Mazza wrote:
--- John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The property strings are given to the Property
object
constructor by some path beginning with a SAX
parser.
It is reasonable to assume that the SAX parser loses
refs to most of these strings
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 02:11, Glen Mazza wrote:
--- John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I mentioned yesterday that I thought I had read a
BTW, The third drawback listed in the link above gave
weak references as an alternative implmentation--I'm
unsure what that construct is about
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 02:11, Glen Mazza wrote:
--- John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I mentioned yesterday that I thought I had read a
comment
by Bruce Eckel suggesting that String.intern() might
be
avoided.
I could not find the reference in either the 2nd or
3rd editions
.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
19225
fo:table-footer 1
fo:table-header 29
fo:table-row 15301
fo:wrapper 1799
Properties: 526648
Tags: 285223
num_keys: 117
num_vals: 13520
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thinking again along the lines of handling properties more
like C++ virtual function table (vTable). This object is larger
than Peter's ordered Property array, but would be faster.
That's a reason C++ has fast virtual function dispatching.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 16:35, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Darn, racall the last post.
John Austin wrote:
Note that storing the property name and value refs supplied
to the Property constructor will use 45,620 strings. If the
Property implementation employs canonical mapping to ensure
that only
.
And just to say something completely ludicrous, because someone
will take it seriously ...
You could convert those expressions to a Java class, compile, load
and invoke it with Reflection ...
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 14:57, Victor Mote wrote:
John Austin wrote:
I am critical
Now, if you can figure out how to digest an FO document without building a
tree that represents a page-sequence object, I hope you'll share it with the
rest of us. That could be a breakthrough indeed.
I am
resolving properties. That would help
clarify things, and we can use it for testing.
And there are reasons to create a set of XSL-FO documents
providing test cases. I am concerned that some of Peter's
NameSpace code hasn't been tested (or is just hard to grok).
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no suggestion for implementation and my earlier
submission is not relevant except as an indication that this issue is
linked to performance.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Victor, I was mostly backing away from my earlier posting which was
off-target.
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 13:26, Victor Mote wrote:
John Austin wrote:
After thinking about the proposal, I'm not sure it solves anything.
you might make to the implementation would require (I think) changes
to the XSL files
that generate the code.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for cocoon-2.1.3
supplies the defaults: JAVA_OPTIONS=-Xms32m -Xmx512m but does not
specify '-server'.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 16:23, Glen Mazza wrote:
--- John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My own feeling is that FOP
will remain
problematic for large documents and this will be
especially so in
server environments such as Cocoon.
We hear you, and we do emphasize performance
the 'steenkin badges' quote originated with
WKRP's Dr. Johnny Fever.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 15:50, J.Pietschmann wrote:
John Austin wrote:
It is clear that there is a fair bit of memory freed by Driver.reset().
After thinking it over, I modified the same test to skip reset() and
just null the reference and issue System.gc().
This should be the same
and Saxons
?.
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
memory
allocated from inside Driver() (and therefore inside FOP).
This approach is of little help to the developer who builds an
application that dies of memory exhaustion in production. We will have
to fix the logical leaks inside FOP to improve the user experience.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED
they use Driver.reset().
Hmm. I wonder what would Jimmy Buffet do ?
I mean, I wonder what Cocoon does ?
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 00:43, John Austin wrote:
I mean, I wonder what Cocoon does ?
In FOPSerializer:
/**
* Recycle serializer by removing references
*/
public void recycle() {
super.recycle();
this.driver = null;
this.renderer = null
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 15:22, Victor Mote wrote:
John Austin wrote:
to work on this but I don't want to walk in to a firefight.
FWIW, I don't think there is really a firefight. Our discussions are usually
at least robust, maybe even rowdy, but AFAICT, there is a large amount of
mutual
integrating it.
I don't expect fast-track to committer status, I would hope to work
with one or two current participants and package the changes so that
they 'drop in' to place. (We'll see)
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 19:50, Peter B. West wrote:
John Austin wrote:
...
My apologies to everyone on the list for the testy tone ...
You mean I might have help p*ss*ng people off ?
Peter
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
down.
--
John Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 11:13, you wrote:
I have tried to read the docs. I had used distinct before but not
in an embedded application.
Function not supported. Is my error message.
I have inclued my stack Trace. My includes in my application. and my
stylesheet.
Thanks in advance for
On Friday 12 April 2002 22:43, you wrote:
yep
The only area that Windows is (arguably) superior to Unix is in
Graphics and especially FONTS. A consequence of Windows success is
the fact that almost all computers have Windows licenses. This lets us
use the Windows fonts. You need to have
On Thursday 11 April 2002 09:37, you wrote:
Hi,
I need information the file xsl:fo transformation in UNIX.
What's I need by uses XSL:FO in UNIX?
Can I do?
You can use xsl:fo in ANY system that has an implementation of the Java
VM. This includes any reasonable implementation of Unix
On Thursday 04 April 2002 14:47, you wrote:
At 08:34 AM 4/4/02 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
like it could be the answer. The only question is, can OOo use it?
license of it's software. My question is why does OOo require FOP to
be LGPLed? You can integrate it into OpenOffice without it
63 matches
Mail list logo
