It seems Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 21:42:19 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
If you are running with tagged queing: turn it off. I got the same
Thanks, turning tags off helps!
It means that sparc64 ATA commit breaks tags. They work nice before it.
I know, I
The recent changes to the /usr/src/share/mk files
have made installing ports broken , also doing a make install world stops at
/usr/src/share/info:
(info)518}make install
Warning: the directory /usr/share/info does not exist!
Perhaps the variable INFODIR is set incorrectly
or your mtree database
It seems Terry Lambert wrote:
My other hunch is that there will need to be a channel reserved
for reset commands to be queued to the disk, so that you can
queue more commands to it later (e.g. can't connect to send the
reset because of the already disconnected commands in progress).
Terry,
Given the impending 4.6-release, might it make sense to back off ata in
-stable to the last known-good state?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
It seems Doug Barton wrote:
Given the impending 4.6-release, might it make sense to back off ata in
The busdma/sparc64 code is *not* in stable...
-Søren
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Søren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Doug Barton wrote:
Given the impending 4.6-release, might it make sense to back off ata in
The busdma/sparc64 code is *not* in stable...
Hmmm... I thought I saw some complaints on -stable, but I might
have been mistaken.
--
We
On 18 Apr, Doug Barton wrote:
Given the impending 4.6-release, might it make sense to back off ata in
-stable to the last known-good state?
We have some time until the code freeze, so give him some days to track
it down. If he is able to fix it: fine, else he can still back it out.
Bye,
hi, there!
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 01:51:19AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
It seems Doug Barton wrote:
Given the impending 4.6-release, might it make sense to back off ata in
The busdma/sparc64 code is *not* in stable...
Hmmm... I thought I saw some complaints on -stable, but I
It seems Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On 18 Apr, Doug Barton wrote:
Given the impending 4.6-release, might it make sense to back off ata in
-stable to the last known-good state?
We have some time until the code freeze, so give him some days to track
it down. If he is able to fix it: fine,
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2002 05:00 schrieb Craig Boston:
My only trouble so far has been mount_smbfs panicking the machine when
connecting to certain servers (but not others, weird). I'm compiling a
debug kernel now and will attempt to get a good backtrace to post.
I have the same problem,
Søren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Terry Lambert wrote:
My other hunch is that there will need to be a channel reserved
for reset commands to be queued to the disk, so that you can
queue more commands to it later (e.g. can't connect to send the
reset because of the already disconnected
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 06:34:38AM +0900, Eugene M. Kim wrote:
Don't know what prevented this from being caught, but:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/compat/Makefile.inc?only_with_tag=MAIN#rev1.5
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 12:04:35AM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote:
The recent changes to the /usr/src/share/mk files
have made installing ports broken , also doing a make install world stops at
/usr/src/share/info:
(info)518}make install
Warning: the directory /usr/share/info does not exist!
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
I got this fault on a production machine..
The given fault PC was 0xc01499f0 which is the first byte of fxpintr()
(??)
even though coredumps were enabled, for some reason none was made.
wss0c left this message in /var/log/messages:
Apr
It seems Terry Lambert wrote:
Søren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Terry Lambert wrote:
My other hunch is that there will need to be a channel reserved
for reset commands to be queued to the disk, so that you can
queue more commands to it later (e.g. can't connect to send the
reset
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2002 16:44 schrieb Søren Schmidt:
It seems Terry Lambert wrote:
Søren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Terry Lambert wrote:
My other hunch is that there will need to be a channel reserved
for reset commands to be queued to the disk, so that you can
queue more
I got this as well, setting the ENV variable however seems to resolve it
temporarily
export INFODIR=/usr/share/info
setenv INFODIR /usr/share/info
Whichever shell you use, chose the appropriate one, atleast it seemed to
work for me, and I have not noticed any problems.
Jason
-Original
It seems Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
I didn't mean for the reset itself, I meant for the process. You
can't take back writes that are in progress and not acknowledged,
in order to retry them after the reset, so as to not lose data.
Oh yes you can, the ATA driver does just that in
Søren Schmidt wrote:
I didn't mean for the reset itself, I meant for the process. You
can't take back writes that are in progress and not acknowledged,
in order to retry them after the reset, so as to not lose data.
Oh yes you can, the ATA driver does just that in case of the drive
Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
...ahh, I mean, the driver *does* take an action (it/he(?) switches
back to PIO4), but why is any UDMA-Mode no longer usable afterwards?
This is the $64 question.
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the
It seems Terry Lambert wrote:
Søren Schmidt wrote:
I didn't mean for the reset itself, I meant for the process. You
can't take back writes that are in progress and not acknowledged,
in order to retry them after the reset, so as to not lose data.
Oh yes you can, the ATA driver does
This won't help people using similair drives (in one of my machines)
that I am using, I have the same problem in current that I have in
RELENG_4,
It times out and drops to PIO4 mode after a few min. I dropped
atacontrol mode 0 pio4 none (I only have the 1 drive on the chain)
before the fsck
Bill Fenner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Part of the commit log for rev 1.32 of pam_unix.c says:
- remove dummy functions since OpenPAM handles missing service
functions
However, OpenPAM is noisy about handling missing service functions:
Apr 17 11:21:31 stash login: in
Søren Schmidt wrote:
Oh yes you can, the ATA driver does just that in case of the drive
loosing its marbels.
If it worked, people wouldn't be having this problem.
Hmm, since I havn't been able to get my hands on the problem
(I've been running 3 systems here with tags all over since
It seems Terry Lambert wrote:
Hmm, since I havn't been able to get my hands on the problem
(I've been running 3 systems here with tags all over since the
first report, not a single hickup yet :( ) I can't tell whats
going on, it might be that the drive somehow gets really confused
I
I have a dell poweredge 500sc currently running 4.5-STABLE with the
following:
atapci0: ServerWorks CSB5 ATA100 controller port
0x8c0-0x8c3,0x8b0-0x8bf,0x374-0x377,0x170-0x177,0x3f4-0x3f7,0x1f0-0x1f7 at
device 15.1 on pci0
ad0: 19073MB IC35L020AVER07-0 [38752/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
and
On 18 Apr, Søren Schmidt wrote:
What's your theory on it?
None so far, I've instrumented the code here, and I simply cannot
see what should go wrong (yet).
Does it make sense to give this instrumentation to someone who can
reproduce it?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
It's not a
It seems Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On 18 Apr, Søren Schmidt wrote:
What's your theory on it?
None so far, I've instrumented the code here, and I simply cannot
see what should go wrong (yet).
Does it make sense to give this instrumentation to someone who can
reproduce it?
Not
It seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This won't help people using similair drives (in one of my machines)
that I am using, I have the same problem in current that I have in
RELENG_4,
It times out and drops to PIO4 mode after a few min. I dropped
atacontrol mode 0 pio4 none (I only have the 1
--- Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had four seperate and distinct panics on my -current box from
yesterday in the last twenty minutes. -CURRENT appears to be somewhat
unstable. Yes, this is -CURRENT; please wear a hard hat and avoid
manipulating critical data using you -CURRENT
I was getting the same Signal 12 error about a week ago.. What I had
to end up doing was after a 'buildworld', then rebuilding the kernel
installing it and then rebooting. Then after this doing an
'installworld, then things seemed to be alright from then on :-)
Glenn G.
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002
Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could people test this in-kernel DRM and tell me how it works for them?
Seems to work fine here (trusty ol' Matrox G200 w/8 MB). Is there a
particular DRI application I can use to somehow stress-test or
benchmark the module? I've gotten kind of tired of
Coolio, thanks for letting me in the know.
Cheers,
Eugene
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 04:26:20PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Already fixed this earlier this morning (local time).
And just removed the gratuitous LIBCOMPATDIR assignments.
Cheers,
--
Ruslan ErmilovSysadmin and
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2002 17:54 schrieb Terry Lambert:
I wish someone who is having the problem would try the three
hacks I suggested, and report back. I personally can't reproduce
the problem here, either.
Ok, ok... ;-) I start *now*. I just compiled a new -current world
(...puhh)
On 18 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Actually, the bug is in the PAM configuration files that list pam_unix
as a session module while pam_unix doesn't provide session
management services. PAM is correct in whining about that. The
solution is to remove lines like this from
Matthew N. Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If not pam_unix, what module is responsible for updating utmp?
pam_lastlog(8) (though there seems to be a problem with sshd)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
Could people test this in-kernel DRM and tell me how it works
for them?
Works fine for me on a Matrox G400 with the standard Mesa apps, Linux Unreal
Tournament, and a custom build of Quake2 for FreeBSD. Good work!
Scott
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
hi,
heck, was it hard for me (a person who never used freebsd) to find the
right address ... nah, whatever. :)
src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_init.c
some time ago you commited a workaround for processes with pid 1 (and no
stdio).
On 18 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could people test this in-kernel DRM and tell me how it works for them?
Seems to work fine here (trusty ol' Matrox G200 w/8 MB). Is there a
particular DRI application I can use to somehow stress-test or
benchmark
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matthew N. Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If not pam_unix, what module is responsible for updating utmp?
pam_lastlog(8) (though there seems to be a problem with sshd)
Yep, the problem seems to be that sshd calls pam_open_session(3) too
early.
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2002 17:54 schrieb Terry Lambert:
I wish someone who is having the problem would try the three
hacks I suggested, and report back. I personally can't reproduce
the problem here, either.
So: I changed line 186 in sys/dev/ata/ata-disk.c from
adp-num_tags =
I just pulled php4 from cvs and found that libtool version 1.4 is
required for the build. I know the popular response is to say shut up
and code, but I'm not afraid to admit that libtool is way over my head.
I just hope some sympathetic genius sees this and decides they're not
above
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
http://www.specbench.org/gpc/opc.static/vp50.htm
This is probably a more useful URL:
http://www.specbench.org/gpc/opc.static/overview.htm
(thought I hit back before copying-and-pasting the URL, but I guess not)
- Brandon D. Valentine
To
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote:
# uname -a
FreeBSD nic-naa.net 4.5-STABLE FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE #0: Wed Apr 17 10:35:32 EDT 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/ABENAKI i386
[snip ...]
install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 chflags /bin
Hi,
i cant record from /dev/dsp with the record device 'mic'. Is there support
for the microphone input?
Jan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Hi,
i cant record from /dev/dsp with the record device 'mic'. Is
there support
for the microphone input?
What sound card are you using?
Scott
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yep, the problem seems to be that sshd calls pam_open_session(3) too
early. I'm looking into it right now.
Try the attached patch. You'll need to rebuild libutil and restart
sshd.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Hi all,
If anyone recalls, I sent a post before which was about changing the
kernel path changes in the (only) -current man pages. As these are
related to -current, I am sending them to this list for a complete
review. I had given this to Giorgos (keramida@), but he has been
busy and ill
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 14:46:25 EST, Peter Schultz wrote:
I just pulled php4 from cvs and found that libtool version 1.4 is
required for the build. I know the popular response is to say shut up
and code, but I'm not afraid to admit that libtool is way over my head.
I just hope some
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:
--- Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had four seperate and distinct panics on my -current box from
yesterday in the last twenty minutes. -CURRENT appears to be somewhat
unstable. Yes, this is -CURRENT; please wear a hard hat and avoid
Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2002 17:54 schrieb Terry Lambert:
I wish someone who is having the problem would try the three
hacks I suggested, and report back. I personally can't reproduce
the problem here, either.
So: I changed line 186 in
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Thomas Wuerfl wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2002 05:00 schrieb Craig Boston:
My only trouble so far has been mount_smbfs panicking the machine when
connecting to certain servers (but not others, weird). I'm compiling a
debug kernel now and will attempt to get a
Hi everyone, I has seen the manual and /sys/ufs/ufs/README.* . I add the following to the kernel conf: options UFS_EXTATTR options UFS_EXTATTR_AUTOSTART options UFS_ACL Then, I saw extattrctl and setextattr's manual. But I do not know what's meaning. For example, I has a user name Jack, who is a
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, kai ouyang wrote:
options UFS_EXTATTR
options UFS_EXTATTR_AUTOSTART
options UFS_ACL
Now you have to create backing storage for extended attributes, ALC in
your case. This can be achieved by the following commands:
# cd /
# mkdir .attribute
55 matches
Mail list logo
