I have been trying to install virtualbox support for my FreeBSD 9.1. A
package named v4l_compat-1.0.20120501.tar.gz is causing problems in the
installation. The package was downloaded automatically and it exists in
/usr/ports/distfiles, yet it keeps giving an error stating that the file
doesn't
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Harpreet Singh Chawla
preet10101...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been trying to install virtualbox support for my FreeBSD 9.1. A
package named v4l_compat-1.0.20120501.tar.gz is causing problems in the
installation. The package was downloaded automatically and it
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Harpreet Singh Chawla
preet10101...@gmail.com wrote:
yup...did it...and downloaded manually...
But its giving a checksum matching error.
*Harpreet Singh Chawla*
On 29 August 2013 22:48, Amitabh Kant amitabhk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at
Hi,
2013/2/3 ajtiM lum...@gmail.com:
Hi!
I have installed KDE 4.9.5 and Calligra 2.5.5 from area51.
I am not sure how is working:
I use portsnap which update ports and KDE 4.9.5 ports are merged. Last time I
saw many update for KDE 4.8.4 which update KDE 4.9.5 ports and so on.
Does anyone
On Sunday 03 February 2013 23:40:46 Olivier Smedts wrote:
Hi,
2013/2/3 ajtiM lum...@gmail.com:
Hi!
I have installed KDE 4.9.5 and Calligra 2.5.5 from area51.
I am not sure how is working:
I use portsnap which update ports and KDE 4.9.5 ports are merged. Last
time I saw many update
For those interested...
hostileadmin.com has published a new blog entitled FreeBSD Ports Batch
Install at http://blog.hostileadmin.com/2012/12/10/freebsd-ports-batch-install/
--
Take care
Rick Miller
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hello,
I am thinking about creating a port for SOGo[1]. Is there already someone
working on it?
Kind regards,
Matthias
[1] http://www.sogo.nu/english.html
--
Matthias Petermann matth...@d2ux.net
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
___
freebsd-po...@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
I have done:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/sogo.tar.gz
and
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt
Hello All,
I have a similar problem with passive ftp due to a self-imposed
restrictive firewall. When make fetch is run on a port and ftp data
is required, the PF firewall stops the program from completing. I got
around this problem by restarting the firewall with a separate set of
rules
We handle a lot of highly sensitive information and that's the need for the
severe lock-down. Even the web-proxy is restricted to the sites accessible
meaning that we need to request access if we need to go somewhere not
governed by that proxy.
this make sense.
just blocking everything except
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:58:24 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar articulated:
We handle a lot of highly sensitive information and that's the need
for the severe lock-down. Even the web-proxy is restricted to the
sites accessible meaning that we need to request access if we need
to go somewhere
Kaya Saman kayasaman at gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
At present they are running a whole bunch of CentOS
http://www.freeproxy.ru/en/free_proxy/faq/index.htm
How to bypass corporate proxy?
go away from corporation. A side effect is saving your mental health on
the long run.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Wojciech Puchar wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl writes:
http://www.freeproxy.ru/en/free_proxy/faq/index.htm
How to bypass corporate proxy?
go away from corporation. A side effect is saving your mental health on
the long run.
Well, judging by
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into
Hi,
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
At present they are running a whole bunch of CentOS based boxes and
VM's which of course can be run through
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
At present they are running a whole bunch of CentOS
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Devin Teske devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:23:29 -0500, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Getting the ports tree with csup/cvsup wouldn't use ftp. You could run
your own local mirror (net/cvsup-mirror) as well.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:23:29 -0500, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Getting the ports tree with csup/cvsup wouldn't use ftp. You could run
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:00:01 -0500, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, this is a good idea I was actually thinking about this.
I've never done it so I'd need to google around a bit and do some
testing but it is probably what we would want to do!
Install the port, run the setup
On 12 Jul 2012, at 17:23, Kaya Saman wrote:
How does one get round this issue as my superiors are telling me that
opening up FTP is a security risk and therefor don't want to proceed?
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Can anyone sugget
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Devin Teske devin.te...@fisglobal.com
wrote:
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm
Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:23:29 -0500, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Getting the ports tree with
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Devin Teske devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Devin Teske devin.te...@fisglobal.com
wrote:
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
do you work FOR that company. Ask administrator to unblock if for you as
you need it for work.
Do you do
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
do you work FOR that
.
As far as I remember this can be done at least via the http://delegate.org
software, certainly available in the ports collection.
Kaya, if your http proxy handles HTTP CONNECT to the port 21/ftp this can be
the workaround for you about the freebsd ports requiring ftp download ability.
Most surprise
be
the workaround for you about the freebsd ports requiring ftp download ability.
Most surprise for me is why no one is interested about what kind of a danger
the ftp protocol can ever be? i. e. skype is much more vicious in comparison
to
ftp and s much harder to be restricted by a packet filter
The information comes straight down from the IT director who will
**not** change his mind on this as I have asked several times in the
past.
I just told about solution to a problem. Not a workaround.
How you can make your work if your director actively prevent it!?
Basically without getting
Most surprise for me is why no one is interested about what kind of a danger
the ftp protocol can ever be? i. e. skype is much more vicious in comparison to
As in lots of companies where idiots are directors (common case) the
danger is because it is something that doesn't exist. As we all know
Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org writes:
2012/07/12 13:19:56 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org = To Kaya Saman :
LG URLs as well as FTP. For ones that aren't, (and assuming the rather
LG silly security policies won't allow for an external web-based FTP proxy)
of the base system but supplied with taking the OS specs in mind.
ftp is a way to obtain a distfile, ie what the 3rd party software developer use
to distribute. For FreeBSD ports cvsup and ftp are not competent in the daiy
use as they have different purposes.
Some 3rd party software is released
Hello.
2012/07/12 14:44:48 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org = To Peter Vereshagin :
LG Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org writes:
LG
LG 2012/07/12 13:19:56 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org = To Kaya Saman :
LG LG URLs as well as FTP.
Does your IT director understand the active/passive distinction? If not
From what he described his director is plain moron. He required him to
block things that HE needs to work, leaving port 80 open so things that
are best in distracting from work (youtube, facebook...) works, as well as
for the particular program(s) those are not the part
of the base system but supplied with taking the OS specs in mind.
ftp is a way to obtain a distfile, ie what the 3rd party software developer use
to distribute. For FreeBSD ports cvsup and ftp are not competent in the daiy
use as they have different purposes
On 07/12/2012 08:13 PM, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 06:44:56PM +0100, Kaya Saman wrote:
I do infact work for this company and additionally I am one of the
administrators of the company.
The information comes straight down from the IT director who will
**not** change his
My issues start coming into play when building the actual port itself. Ie.
fetching the distfile, as you suggested above.
As soon as I start running portmaster -a or a 'make install clean' on certain
ports, the progress just bombs out totally.
as you've said it is not a problem at all
On 12/07/2012 21:26, Kaya Saman wrote:
My issues start coming into play when building the actual port itself.
Ie. fetching the distfile, as you suggested above.
As soon as I start running portmaster -a or a 'make install clean' on
certain ports, the progress just bombs out totally.
It
Hello.
2012/07/12 21:26:22 +0100 Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
KS A Demo? Am I invited for the show? ;-)
KS Something like a Linux repo server if you will - though I mention the
KS term very loosely.
SHould you try with a ixsystems's pcbsd.org then?
On 07/12/2012 09:46 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 12/07/2012 21:26, Kaya Saman wrote:
My issues start coming into play when building the actual port itself.
Ie. fetching the distfile, as you suggested above.
As soon as I start running portmaster -a or a 'make install clean' on
certain ports,
files,
sample configuration files for the particular program(s) those are
not the part
of the base system but supplied with taking the OS specs in mind.
ftp is a way to obtain a distfile, ie what the 3rd party software
developer use
to distribute. For FreeBSD ports cvsup and ftp
Hiya
I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen on the
FreeBSD ports.
To show you what I mean.
[root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# portaudit -F -a; portsnap fetch update;
pkg_version -vIL=; freebsd-update fetch install
auditfile.tbz
On 6/1/12 9:49 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
Hiya
I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen
on the FreeBSD ports.
To show you what I mean.
[root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# portaudit -F -a; portsnap fetch update;
pkg_version -vIL=; freebsd-update fetch install
On 01/06/2012 09:34, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 6/1/12 9:49 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
Hiya
I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen
on the FreeBSD ports.
To show you what I mean.
[root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# portaudit -F -a; portsnap fetch update;
pkg_version
On Friday 01 June 2012 04:25:12 Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 01/06/2012 09:34, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 6/1/12 9:49 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
Hiya
I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen
on the FreeBSD ports.
To show you what I mean.
[root@torry /usr
Hello list,
are there any emulators out there that can run the non-x86 versions of FreeBSD
on a FreeBSD/i386 or FreeBSD/amd64 host?
I'm especially interested in trying FreeBSD/sparc64 port, but I'd also like to
test the FreeBSD/powerpc and the FreeBSD/arm ports on an emulator, before
seeking
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Jan 28 11:37:00 2011
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:27:35 +0100
From: C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws
To: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Emulators to test non-x86 FreeBSD ports?
Hello list,
are there any emulators out
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:27 AM, C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
Hello list,
are there any emulators out there that can run the non-x86 versions of FreeBSD
on a FreeBSD/i386 or FreeBSD/amd64 host?
I'm especially interested in trying FreeBSD/sparc64 port, but I'd also like to
test the
: Emulators to test non-x86 FreeBSD ports?
Hello list,
are there any emulators out there that can run the non-x86 versions of
FreeBSD on a FreeBSD/i386 or FreeBSD/amd64 host?
Such things, by definition, are a 'simulator', not an 'emulator'. They
exist, they are *pricey* (think 5 figures, left
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:56 PM, David Brodbeck g...@gull.us wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:27 AM, C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
Hello list,
are there any emulators out there that can run the non-x86 versions of
FreeBSD
on a FreeBSD/i386 or FreeBSD/amd64 host?
I'm especially
Em Qui, 2010-04-29 às 23:27 +0530, Ashish SHUKLA escreveu:
Aldis Berjoza writes:
Hello!
Some time ago I've read, that FreeBSD might be interested
to move ports tree to database (sqlite?).
This would require rewriting of all existing and writing
some new tools related to ports.
I
Sergio de Almeida Lenzi writes:
[...]
Interesting project.. but the link to the patches are broken ===
http://home.no.net/andenore/patches/
does someone knows a site with have the patches??? I would like to give
it a try...
Must be in FreeBSD's perforce repository.
--
Sent via Gnus from
Hi,
I can't get the ncurses-based menu shown by running make config for an
arbitrary port in FreeBSD 8.0 to use UTF-8 line drawing characters,
rather than ISO-8859-1.
I've configured my locale by setting
:charset=UTF-8:\
:lang=en_US.UTF-8:
in /etc/login.conf and then running cap_mkdb,
Hello,
I've been looking for drop-box functionality for a while, but I can't
find any in the ports. Perhaps it's there but I'm not looking for the
right keywords.
Preferably something that's completely web-based (PHP) (no FTP or SCP)
and maintenance-free.
For example: a user uploads a (set of)
On Behalf Of RW
I don't normally do this as Watson is usually less impressed when
Holmes reveals his working, but the clues were there. He wrote:
install software with ports (i.e, the
/usr/ports collection.)
and
FTP to grab source files from mirrors
If you combine that
I just set up a new server with a very restricted PF configuration.
One problem: I can no longer install software with ports (i.e, the /
usr/ports collection.) I have to disable PF to do so. Obviously not a
great solution.
Am I correct in guessing that ports uses FTP to grab source files
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:45:04PM -0400, John Almberg wrote:
I just set up a new server with a very restricted PF configuration. One
problem: I can no longer install software with ports (i.e, the /
usr/ports collection.) I have to disable PF to do so. Obviously not a
great solution.
Am
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:51:16 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:45:04PM -0400, John Almberg wrote:
I just set up a new server with a very restricted PF configuration.
One problem: I can no longer install software with ports (i.e,
the / usr/ports
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 06:54:32PM +0100, RW wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:51:16 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:45:04PM -0400, John Almberg wrote:
I just set up a new server with a very restricted PF configuration.
One problem: I can no longer
problem: I can no longer install software with ports (i.e, the /usr/ports
collection.) I have to disable PF to do so. Obviously not a great solution.
Am I correct in guessing that ports uses FTP to grab source files from
FTP or HTTP.
if you have http proxy like squid in your network do
On Oct 10, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 06:54:32PM +0100, RW wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:51:16 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:45:04PM -0400, John Almberg wrote:
I just set up a new server with a very restricted
sh/bash: export FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=true
Ah... because in passive mode, the client (my server) sets the data
port, and my PF rules allow return data on the port used for the
request.
Okay... that makes sense, I think... (little by little, it sinks in...)
-- John
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:41:40 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 06:54:32PM +0100, RW wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:51:16 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
passive ftp has been the default for long time, fetch is called
with the -p option.
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:16:29 -0400
John Almberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 10, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
See the fetch(1) man page. Try this first:
sh/bash: export FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=true
csh: setenv FTP_PASSIVE_MODE true
First off, this did solve the problem.
sh/bash: export FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=true
csh: setenv FTP_PASSIVE_MODE true
First off, this did solve the problem. Thank you, Jeremy.
Now, as to the why...
That's odd, because if you are running 7.x with a default settings,
FTP_PASSIVE_MODE should be irrelevant to fetching distfiles - even
Hi FreeBSD users
I am searching for something similar to Red Hat's rpm -q -l package
and Debian's dpkg -L package.
cheers
Simon
--
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
El día Thursday, June 05, 2008 a las 03:35:01PM +0200, Simon Jolle escribió:
Hi FreeBSD users
I am searching for something similar to Red Hat's rpm -q -l package
and Debian's dpkg -L package.
cheers
Simon
Don't know nothing about Red Hat or Debian, but how about
$ pkg_info -L
On 6/5/08, Matthias Apitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't know nothing about Red Hat or Debian, but how about
$ pkg_info -L stardict-2.4.8_5
or even
$ man pkg_info
HIH
matthias
Thank you Matthias
--
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:35:01 +0200
From: Simon Jolle
Subject: list files in FreeBSD ports tree package
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi FreeBSD users
I am searching for something similar to Red Hat's rpm -q -l
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
Camilo Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best way to do searches on a BSD system is to use good old
'locate,' or even 'find / -name package.'
i think you can also look in /var/db/pkg or do pkg_info | grep WHATEVER
if i understood the original post
Add the following to /etc/make.conf (create if it doesn't exist):
WANT_OPENLDAP_VER= 24
Eric (Thanks folks)
On Feb 11, 2008, at 2:27 PM, Mark Foster wrote:
Eric F Crist wrote:
I'm trying to use OpenLDAP 2.4, which I installed from the FreeBSD
ports tree. However, everything else I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Eric F Crist wrote:
I'm not finding what you're referring to. I've looked into all the
Makefile* files in /usr/ports/www/apache22 and I cannot find an option
to tell apache22 to build with openldap24-sasl-client.
WITH_SASL= yes
want that port to use.
David Alanis
Quoting Eric F Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello folks!
First off, please reply-all as I'm not longer a subscriber.
I'm trying to use OpenLDAP 2.4, which I installed from the FreeBSD
ports tree. However, everything else I try to install, LDAP
support
Hello folks!
First off, please reply-all as I'm not longer a subscriber.
I'm trying to use OpenLDAP 2.4, which I installed from the FreeBSD
ports tree. However, everything else I try to install, LDAP support
in Apache22, pam_ldap, seems to want to use 2.3.40 instead.
Obviously, it tries
the correct version of ldap you want that port to use.
David Alanis
Quoting Eric F Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello folks!
First off, please reply-all as I'm not longer a subscriber.
I'm trying to use OpenLDAP 2.4, which I installed from the FreeBSD
ports tree. However, everything else I try to install
Eric F Crist wrote:
I'm trying to use OpenLDAP 2.4, which I installed from the FreeBSD
ports tree. However, everything else I try to install, LDAP support
in Apache22, pam_ldap, seems to want to use 2.3.40 instead.
Obviously, it tries to install that version, which fails since 2.4.7
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:00:08AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:57:56PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
Hi Kris,
I know things must be pretty busy with 6.2, but is there any chance that
the 5.5-STABLE packages can be updated soon? I just checked again, and
at least
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 at 04:17:21 -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:00:08AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:57:56PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
Hi Kris,
I know things must be pretty busy with 6.2, but is there any chance that
the
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:00:08AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:57:56PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
Hi Kris,
I know things must be pretty busy with 6.2, but is there any chance that
the 5.5-STABLE packages can be updated soon? I just checked again, and
at least
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
OK, I've uploaded the packages now and they'll begin propagating out
to the mirrors.
Thanks again. Now I'm right out of excuses, eh?
Cheers, Ian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi Kris,
I know things must be pretty busy with 6.2, but is there any chance that
the 5.5-STABLE packages can be updated soon? I just checked again, and
at least apache and phpyadmin are still stale, going on two months now.
Cheers, Ian
___
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:57:56PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
Hi Kris,
I know things must be pretty busy with 6.2, but is there any chance that
the 5.5-STABLE packages can be updated soon? I just checked again, and
at least apache and phpyadmin are still stale, going on two months now.
Mark,
Does the FreeBSd ports tree work on NetBSD or OpenBSD?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 14 December 2006 18:37, Ansar Mohammed wrote:
Does the FreeBSd ports tree work on NetBSD or OpenBSD?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Hi all,
FreeBSD paqi.smithi.id.au 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #0: Sun Nov 19
20:22:12 EST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PAQI5S_2 i386
On 4th December, after a recent portsnap fetch/update, I ran portupgrade
-anPP to prefetch all available packages for a well overdue upgrade of
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 03:44:13AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
Hi all,
FreeBSD paqi.smithi.id.au 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #0: Sun Nov 19
20:22:12 EST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PAQI5S_2 i386
On 4th December, after a recent portsnap fetch/update, I ran portupgrade
-anPP
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 03:44:13AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
[..]
I was glad I'd specified -PP .. every fetch from $subject directory
failed. Checking manually, then and again tonight, I see that indeed
only the versions of files that were
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:26:42AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 03:44:13AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
[..]
I was glad I'd specified -PP .. every fetch from $subject directory
failed. Checking manually, then and again tonight,
Hello everyone,
I'm looking for a way to link perl modules found in CPAN and the ones
found in the FreeBSD ports repository.
For example, let's say I need to install the following CPAN module:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/libwww-perl/lib/HTTP/Request/Common.pm
A search in the ports for ^p5
David Robillard wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm looking for a way to link perl modules found in CPAN and the ones
found in the FreeBSD ports repository.
For example, let's say I need to install the following CPAN module:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/libwww-perl/lib/HTTP/Request/Common.pm
A search
Hi there,
I would like to know if it would be possible to mirror the FreeBSD Ports on
a server in Australia, I would not require any rsync it would be set up
manually.
If you could please let me know that would be great.
Many thanks
James D
www.exetel.com.au
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 06:52:49AM +1100, James D wrote:
Hi there,
I would like to know if it would be possible to mirror the FreeBSD Ports on
a server in Australia, I would not require any rsync it would be set up
manually.
If you could please let me know that would be great
Vaaf wrote:
We need someone to do the coding, XHTML/CSS, though some Ruby
and Ajax too wouldn't hurt, so we can have a decent system in the back,
and in the front be able to present information in a very intuitive way.
Then, we'd need lots of members to write articles, rate ports and such.
I'd
everything to
make it superior to all the other open source operating
systems, but nothing to really let it out in the open.
Imagine a FreeBSD ports blog that tries to gather data
on the most popular ports, sorted by ratings, downloads etc.
In addition, it posts articles every now and then telling
it out in the open.
Imagine a FreeBSD ports blog that tries to gather data
on the most popular ports, sorted by ratings, downloads etc.
In addition, it posts articles every now and then telling
people about recent discoveries made among all the 10.000
ports. This could be a great thing!
I
constantly
searching freebsd ports and then in another tab searching google for
the app i just found to figure out what in the world it is.
i realize it would be double work for some maintainers but it can be
written to be fairly automated im sure. and the port maintainers can
just leave
it superior to all the other open source operating
systems, but nothing to really let it out in the open.
Imagine a FreeBSD ports blog that tries to gather data
on the most popular ports, sorted by ratings, downloads etc.
In addition, it posts articles every now and then telling
people about
to the homepage for the app would be nice. im constantly
searching freebsd ports and then in another tab searching google for
the app i just found to figure out what in the world it is.
i realize it would be double work for some maintainers but it can be
written to be fairly automated im
I developed a useful habit of reading a full commits log
on freshports every morning. This way you always taste
the cream of the collection.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 17:10:26 -0500, Parv wrote
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote martinko thusly...
Norberto Meijome wrote:
Hans Nieser wrote:
FreeBSD Prospect wrote:
...
What I am especially fond of in portage is the USE-flags and the
way you can specify then globally and
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
