On Oct 26, 2008, at 7:23 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
1) Incoming SMTP (e.g. someIP:* -- yourIP:25)
2) Outbound SMTP (e.g. yourIP:* -- someIP:25)
#2 has become prominent in the past few years, and is applied by ISPs
because they want to curb their customers sending spam out onto the
Internet
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:23:59 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 06:55:53PM -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Hello,
Quick thanks to Andrew Clark, Jeremy Chadwick, Tim Kellers,
Jeff Goldberg, and anyone whose reply I've not seen re:
this issue.
Isn't hard, as
Hello,
Quick thanks to Andrew Clark, Jeremy Chadwick, Tim Kellers,
Jeff Goldberg, and anyone whose reply I've not seen re:
this issue.
Isn't hard, as several pointed out. Now I've sendmail listening
on any port I want to. Problem is, still can't touch it from
here (and you might have guessed,
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 06:55:53PM -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Hello,
Quick thanks to Andrew Clark, Jeremy Chadwick, Tim Kellers,
Jeff Goldberg, and anyone whose reply I've not seen re:
this issue.
Isn't hard, as several pointed out. Now I've sendmail listening
on any port I want to.
Hello,
For various reasons, I find myself in need of an MTA
accepting submission on a port other than 587 (or 25).
It'd be Real Nice(tm) if sendmail could Just Do It,
but I'd be willing to look at other options as well,
as long as I can get a good spam solution to play nice
with the server
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:50:39AM -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Hello,
For various reasons, I find myself in need of an MTA
accepting submission on a port other than 587 (or 25).
It'd be Real Nice(tm) if sendmail could Just Do It,
but I'd be willing to look at other options as well
On Fri 2008-10-24 10:50:39 UTC-0500, Kevin Kinsey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
For various reasons, I find myself in need of an MTA accepting
submission on a port other than 587 (or 25).
From what I can tell Postfix can be configured to listen on any unused
port (or multiple thereof) by editing
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:50:39AM -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Hello,
For various reasons, I find myself in need of an MTA
accepting submission on a port other than 587 (or 25).
It'd be Real Nice(tm) if sendmail could Just Do It,
but I'd be willing to look at other
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
Receiving mail directly will be more possible, but tricky. You will
need to use a dynamic DNS system. Also do consider uptime and
reliability. In the old days, if one MTA couldn't reach another it
would hold stuff in its queue for four or five days. Now, most MTAs
On Aug 25, 2008, at 12:49 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
In the old days, if one MTA couldn't reach another it would hold
stuff in its queue for four or five days. Now, most MTAs appear to
be configured to give up after 24 hours.
In which case those mail systems
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:49:56 +0100
Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
Receiving mail directly will be more possible, but tricky. You
will need to use a dynamic DNS system. Also do consider uptime and
reliability. In the old days, if one MTA couldn't
domain set to use my cable IP as a MTA, or if I have to
do some kind of end run around cablevision to get a MTA set up locally.
Also looking for advice on which software would serve me bet in this instance.
TIA
Pete C
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
pete wrote:
I have a hosted domain that recently changed their mail filtering. I am
not happy with the new setup and am considering setting up my own.
Looking for tips on setting up something on my freeBSD 6.1 box.
Running your own MTA is one of those sysadmin rights of passage. It's
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:22:34 +0100, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running your own MTA is one of those sysadmin rights of passage. It's
unfortunate that the general levels of spam and other nastyness around
the net make it so much harder than it should be nowadays.
Things
I am very happy with:
Sendmail (the one that comes with Freebsd...)
and messagewall (in the ports).
if you need, I can send you the 3 config files...
that make it all happen.
with this software you can:
1) receive email directly to your computer (provided that port 25 is
open).
2) filter
: whether I can
have my hosted domain set to use my cable IP as a MTA, or if I have to
do some kind of end run around cablevision to get a MTA set up locally.
Also looking for advice on which software would serve me bet in this instance.
TIA
Pete C
You will need either a static IP, or subscribe
).
and am considering setting up my own. Looking for tips on setting up
something on my freeBSD 6.1 box.
Running your own MTA is not for the faint-hearted.
My ISP is cablevision IO. Not sure what they allow, ie: whether I
can have my hosted domain set to use my cable IP as a MTA
The main question
what they allow, ie: whether I can
have my hosted domain set to use my cable IP as a MTA, or if I have to
do some kind of end run around cablevision to get a MTA set up
locally.
Here are the pre-requisites:
- You must have a solid understanding of SMTP, DNS, etc.
- You must have
what they allow, ie: whether I can
have my hosted domain set to use my cable IP as a MTA, or if I have to
do some kind of end run around cablevision to get a MTA set up locally.
Also looking for advice on which software would serve me bet in this instance.
TIA
In my country, the cable
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
Receiving mail directly will be more possible, but tricky. You will
need to use a dynamic DNS system. Also do consider uptime and
reliability. In the old days, if one MTA couldn't reach another it
would hold stuff in its queue for four or five days. Now, most MTAs
On Thursday 13 September 2007 03:46, Jack Stone wrote:
We're switching our MTA from postfix to sendmail on a purely mail relay
server and all is running just fine except for one minor essential.
Is there any way to have sendmail perform the same service as the
recipient_bcc.map
On Thursday 13 September 2007 03:46, Jack Stone wrote:
We're switching our MTA from postfix to sendmail on a purely mail relay
server and all is running just fine except for one minor essential.
Is there any way to have sendmail perform the same service as the
You'll have to look
On 2007-09-12 20:46, Jack Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're switching our MTA from postfix to sendmail on a purely mail
relay server and all is running just fine except for one minor
essential.
Is there any way to have sendmail perform the same service as the
recipient_bcc.map
Having said that, Postfix bundles a lot of the functionality of many
milters. If you are happy with the way Postfix works, why do you have
to switch to Sendmail?
I use both (on different machines) and they both have their 'charms' :-)
Peter
--
http://www.boosten.org
From: Peter Boosten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jonathan McKeown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: fbsd sendmail as MTA
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:00:59 +0200 (CEST)
On Thursday 13 September 2007 03:46, Jack Stone wrote:
We're switching our MTA from
On 2007-09-13 13:49, Peter Boosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having said that, Postfix bundles a lot of the functionality of many
milters. If you are happy with the way Postfix works, why do you have
to switch to Sendmail?
I use both (on different machines) and they both have their 'charms'
On Sep 12, 2007, at 8:46 PM, Jack Stone wrote:
Is there any way to have sendmail perform the same service as the
recipient_bcc.map and sender_bcc.map on postfix? Those using
postfix know this is used to send bcc of certain emails in order to
monitor things like users who might want to know
We're switching our MTA from postfix to sendmail on a purely mail relay
server and all is running just fine except for one minor essential.
Is there any way to have sendmail perform the same service as the
recipient_bcc.map and sender_bcc.map on postfix? Those using postfix know
this is used
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
johan Hartono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: johan Hartono [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Norberto Meijome' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: shared object needed by courier MTA
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:27:01 -0700 (PDT
] On Behalf
Of Norberto Meijome
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 12:52 PM
To: johan Hartono
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: shared object needed by courier MTA
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
johan Hartono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
I was trying to make a working
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
johan Hartono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
I was trying to make a working mail server using freebsd5.5-release and
courier MTA suites.
(you should move up to 6.x if you can, specially since it's a new installation )
What I need from
Dear all,
I was trying to make a working mail server using freebsd5.5-release and courier
MTA suites.
What I need from this box basically are pop3 server, smtpserver, web admin and
webmail.
I install FreeBSD using #8216;developer#8217; canned andpull out
#8216;ports#8217; packages
Hello,
This may be not a standard requirement for MTA, but I wanna configure
a MTA (sendmail, postfix, ...) to receive emails for any domain (It
means I want to catch all emails that go to the MTA). This is use for
a spamer detecting project.
In sendmail or posfix we must make a list
I am running Exim as a sendmail replacement, and I keep getting a
Message failure - message too big in my inbox for root. (looks like
from daily run output)
A message that you sent was longer than the maximum size allowed on this
system. It was not delivered to any recipients.
-- This is
B. Cook wrote:
I am running Exim as a sendmail replacement, and I keep getting a
Message failure - message too big in my inbox for root. (looks like
from daily run output)
I do want to see the mail due to the messages in the queue.. but how do
I get it not to show me rejected mail?
To
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:57:23 -0800 (PST)
From: gahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sm-mta
To: freebsd general questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Hi all:
The sm-mta starts up every time after the system
gahn wrote:
Hi all:
The sm-mta starts up every time after the system
reboots. How could I shut it down? my system is behind
of firewall and I don't need mail daemon.
Thanks
To kill it, find its pid and issue kill(1).
To keep it from resurrecting on your next reboot, try
Hi all:
The sm-mta starts up every time after the system
reboots. How could I shut it down? my system is behind
of firewall and I don't need mail daemon.
Thanks
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
error messages. Here's a view of the syslog:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tail /var/log/messages
Nov 29 13:51:56 fileserver sm-mta[386]: My unqualified host name
(fileserver) unknown; sleeping for retry
Nov 29 13:52:56 fileserver sm-mta[386]: unable to qualify my own domain name
(fileserver) -- using short name
Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, sendmail doesn't seem to work correctly. When the machine boots
and/or I try and send an email using sendmail, I get a bunch of cryptic
error messages. Here's a view of the syslog:
[snip]
What I would do is add something like the following to
try and send an email using sendmail, I get a bunch of cryptic
error messages. Here's a view of the syslog:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tail /var/log/messages
Nov 29 13:51:56 fileserver sm-mta[386]: My unqualified host name
(fileserver) unknown; sleeping for retry
Nov 29 13:52:56 fileserver sm-mta[386
That did the trick, thanks!
--
Kiffin Rex Gish
Gouda, The Netherlands
-Original Message-
From: Stijn Hoop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 14:44
To: Kiffin Gish
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: sm-mta[386]: My unqualified host name
Doing the installation of FreeBSD, there is an opportunity to choose an
MTA. If I choose Postfix for instance, would that be installed as the
default MTA or would the Sendmail program still be the default for the
system, thereby requiring me to configure Postfix to operate with the
system
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 06:44:08 -0400 (Eastern Standard Time)
Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doing the installation of FreeBSD, there is an opportunity to choose an
MTA. If I choose Postfix for instance, would that be installed as the
default MTA or would the Sendmail program still
On 2005-08-11 21:34, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you were to modify qmail to do all the things Sendmail can do, you
would have a result just as complex as Sendmail. Same goes for the
rest of them.
I'm an anti-qmail person myself too, and I can agree with the first part
ot the
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:34:53 -0700 Ted Mittelstaedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sendmail, of course.
Postfix and qmail and the others were written by people
aiming to simplify the MTA because they either couldn't
understand Sendmail or were too lazy to do so. Or they
were catering
I have used sendmail some, postfix to its limits, and currently am
using courier-mta. I'm using courier because it is an all in one
solution for webmail, mta, pop3, and imap. It also easilly does mail
services for multiple domains with a number of configurable backends
(filesystem, database, etc
Aaron Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I have used sendmail some, postfix to its limits, and currently am
| using courier-mta. I'm using courier because it is an all in one
| solution for webmail, mta, pop3, and imap. It also easilly does mail
| services for multiple domains with a number
I have finally made the jump from paying people to host my websites to
doing it myself (setting up apache, perl, php, postgresql, and all that
fun stuff.) Now I want to migrate my e-mail addresses over to a FreeBSD
4.11 machine that lives in a data center. Can any of you recommend a
good MTA
center. Can any of you recommend a good MTA (and maybe a
book) for someone that knows relatively few things about the big scary world
of e-mail transport?
Just to throw it out there, one of the things I need to do is to have the MTA
route mail for a few different domains that are pointed towards
suggestions for a MTA for a new admin?
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Tom Norris wrote:
I have finally made the jump from paying people to host my websites to
doing
it myself (setting up apache, perl, php, postgresql, and all that fun
stuff.)
Now I want to migrate my e-mail addresses over to a FreeBSD 4.11
in a data center. Can any of you recommend a good MTA (and maybe a
book) for someone that knows relatively few things about the big scary world
of e-mail transport?
Just to throw it out there, one of the things I need to do is to have the
MTA
route mail for a few different domains
Hexren wrote:
I'll say exim *let the holly wars start*
So, should I use vi, emacs, or pico to edit the config files ;)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
Tom Norris wrote:
Hexren wrote:
I'll say exim *let the holly wars start*
So, should I use vi, emacs, or pico to edit the config files ;)
None, you should use Vim. :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 2005-08-11 18:00, Tom Norris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hexren wrote:
I'll say exim *let the holly wars start*
So, should I use vi, emacs, or pico to edit the config files ;)
You missed nano, joe, jed and /usr/bin/ee. Not to mention vim :P
___
Something else just occured to me. Am I going to need a separate pop3
daemon, or does postfix do that too?
Thanks again,
Tom Norris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-08-11 18:00, Tom Norris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hexren wrote:
I'll say exim *let the holly wars start*
So, should I use vi, emacs, or pico to edit the config files ;)
You missed nano, joe, jed and /usr/bin/ee. Not to mention vim :P
On 8/11/05, Tom Norris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something else just occured to me. Am I going to need a separate pop3
daemon, or does postfix do that too?
Thanks again,
Tom Norris
You'll need something else for pop/imap.. you might try courier or dovecot...
Mike
Tom Norris wrote:
Something else just occured to me. Am I going to need a separate pop3
daemon, or does postfix do that too?
No, it doesn't (and shouldn't).
popa3d, qpopper.
Or maybe you need imap :-)
--Alex
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Tom Norris wrote:
Something else just occured to me. Am I going to need a separate pop3
daemon, or does postfix do that too?
I've always used qpopper, but that's just me.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
in a data center. Can any of you recommend a
good MTA (and maybe a book) for someone that knows relatively few things
about the big scary world of e-mail transport?
My list of candidates would be Courier, Postfix, or sendmail. I've
never used Postfix, but I'm going to be giving it a test drive
that lives in a data center. Can any of you recommend a
good MTA (and maybe a book) for someone that knows relatively few things
about the big scary world of e-mail transport?
Just to throw it out there, one of the things I need to do is to have
the MTA route mail for a few different domains
Sendmail, of course.
Postfix and qmail and the others were written by people
aiming to simplify the MTA because they either couldn't
understand Sendmail or were too lazy to do so. Or they
were catering to people like this.
Sendmail was written by a huge crew of people along the way
Hello,
I'm looking for a small MTA for Mutt. I tried sSMTP but had to ditch it
since system messages to root @ my ISP couldn't be suppressed.
Any suggestions welcome.
Thanks in advance,
Frits
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 15:07:47 +0200
Frits Westra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for a small MTA for Mutt. I tried sSMTP but had to ditch
it since system messages to root @ my ISP couldn't be suppressed.
you might want to try this : http://esmtp.sourceforge.net
On Friday 03 June 2005 08:07 am, Frits Westra wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for a small MTA for Mutt. I tried sSMTP but had to ditch
it since system messages to root @ my ISP couldn't be suppressed.
Any suggestions welcome.
Thanks in advance,
Frits
I use msmtp. It's can be configured
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 11:22:44PM +, Lonnie Santella wrote:
I need to log the message body of incoming and outgoing messages on my
FreeBSD 5.2.1 Release server. I'm running Exim right now, but I really
don't have a preference of MTA. The main thing is I need to facilitate the
logging
I need to log the message body of incoming and outgoing messages on my
FreeBSD 5.2.1 Release server. I'm running Exim right now, but I really don't
have a preference of MTA. The main thing is I need to facilitate the logging
of message bodies.
I don't want to flood you with too many details
and then store them in mysql or whatever.
On Jun 17, 2004, at 7:22 PM, Lonnie Santella wrote:
I need to log the message body of incoming and outgoing messages on my
FreeBSD 5.2.1 Release server. I'm running Exim right now, but I really
don't have a preference of MTA. The main thing is I need
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 11:22:44PM +, Lonnie Santella wrote:
I need to log the message body of incoming and outgoing messages on my
FreeBSD 5.2.1 Release server. I'm running Exim right now, but I really
don't have a preference of MTA. The main thing is I need to facilitate the
logging
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 07:43:58PM -0400, Lucas Holt said:
Maybe you can use procmail. I had a procmail script that backed up
messages in another mbox file while you were testing new rules. You
could do something similar to backup all incoming messages and then
write a program that could
On Friday 23 April 2004 03:07 pm, Derrick Ryalls Derrick Ryalls
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pardon if this is a bit off topic, but here it goes...
I have a couier-mta system that is running nicely on my 4.9 box, and
I wanted to add some server side mailfilter for some of my email
(like put mail
Greetings,
So I have installed Postfix from the ports, read the pkg-message, read the
changing the MTA in the handbook, and did a bit of searching.
So after the switch, I obviously get:
Apr 23 03:01:00 mx1 postfix/sendmail[2175]: fatal: unsupported: -bh
Apr 23 03:01:01 mx1 postfix/sendmail
Danny wrote:
Greetings,
So I have installed Postfix from the ports, read the pkg-message, read the
changing the MTA in the handbook, and did a bit of searching.
So after the switch, I obviously get:
Apr 23 03:01:00 mx1 postfix/sendmail[2175]: fatal: unsupported: -bh
Apr 23 03:01:01 mx1 postfix
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:51:28 -0400, Bill Moran wrote
Danny wrote:
Greetings,
So I have installed Postfix from the ports, read the pkg-message, read
the
changing the MTA in the handbook, and did a bit of searching.
So after the switch, I obviously get:
Apr 23 03:01:00 mx1
[please fix your mail program so it doesn't mangle emails by wrapping lines]
Danny wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:51:28 -0400, Bill Moran wrote
Danny wrote:
Greetings,
So I have installed Postfix from the ports, read the pkg-message, read
the
changing the MTA in the handbook, and did a bit
On Apr 23, 2004, at 2:12 PM, Danny wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:51:28 -0400, Bill Moran wrote
/etc/defaults/periodic.conf has all the default values for periodic.
Defaults as a reference, or the defaults that are currently enforced
even
without /etc/periodic.conf?
Yes, to both. The two aren't
Pardon if this is a bit off topic, but here it goes...
I have a couier-mta system that is running nicely on my 4.9 box, and I
wanted to add some server side mailfilter for some of my email (like put
mail from this list into a specific folder automatically).
I enabled maildrop in courierd, but I
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:24:08 -0700, David Bear wrote:
I would like to run the stock sendmail freebsd has as a local MTA
only... ie I don't want to listening on ANY real/public interface for
mail. I do want it to handle delivery of local messages to local
accounts -- and handle sending
not sure how to phrase this to limit the number of google hits ..
I would like to run the stock sendmail freebsd has as a local MTA
only... ie I don't want to listening on ANY real/public interface for
mail. I do want it to handle delivery of local messages to local
accounts -- and handle
On Saturday 06 March 2004 09:50 pm, Michael Madden Michael Madden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which MTA is the recommended one to use on FreeBSD?
I've noticed sendmail is installed by default, but
my book I've been learning FreeBSD from (The Complete
FreeBSD) only covers setting up postfix
Postfix aspires to be, it has a zillion hours of runtime
under its belt. Its been at the 1.03 release forever because there hasn't
been anything to fix. If I had one complaint it would be to do an
integration pass over the various pop3/imap/ssl/etc modifications to create
an integrated pop3/mta
* Are you concerned about security?
sendmail is a big monolithic SUID-root programs,
while postfix is a set of isolated processes/programs,
so postfix _may_ be a better alternative.
please don't post false/outdated information.
Sendmail 8.12.* is SGID to a non-privilleged user
On Saturday, 6 March 2004 at 20:50:11 -0600, Michael Madden wrote:
Which MTA is the recommended one to use on FreeBSD?
I've noticed sendmail is installed by default, but
my book I've been learning FreeBSD from (The Complete
FreeBSD) only covers setting up postfix.
But it does say
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:23:18 +1030
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday, 6 March 2004 at 20:50:11 -0600, Michael Madden wrote:
Which MTA is the recommended one to use on FreeBSD?
I've noticed sendmail is installed by default, but
my book I've been learning FreeBSD from
a zillion hours of runtime
under its belt. Its been at the 1.03 release forever because there hasn't
been anything to fix. If I had one complaint it would be to do an
integration pass over the various pop3/imap/ssl/etc modifications to create
an integrated pop3/mta that could allow for roaming
because there hasn't been anything to fix.
If I had one complaint it would be to do an integration pass over
the various pop3/imap/ssl/etc modifications to create an integrated
pop3/mta that could allow for roaming delivery out of the box.
Closest thing is Bruce Guenter's relay-ctrl which is an add
anything to fix. If I had one complaint it would be to do an
integration pass over the various pop3/imap/ssl/etc modifications to create
an integrated pop3/mta that could allow for roaming delivery out of the box.
First, Qmail is available via the port system. The installation does
everything right
Hello,
I'm using postfix and i've got two questions regarding it. Firstly, i'd
like to implement maildir style mailboxes for users. I want a pop server
that will understand maildir, will qpopper do this or will i have to look at
another? I'd like to avoid running services from inetd if
bounces are perged without me seeing them.
Yes, a very popular one (challenge/auth mechanism) is TMDA, can be
used with any MTA. It is very flexible, and does a good job.
http://tmda.net/
Finally, I've got a domain on a dynamic IP, i'd like to relay through
my isp's smtp server as a smarthost, if i do
I am surprised that no one has mentioned exim. Been using it since
97 and wouldn't use anything else. Very straight forward to configure,
very powerful, and very well supported by its author and the
community...
I believe it is in the ports system, but I build my own so I don't know
for
On Mar 7, 2004, at 9:02 PM, dave wrote:
I want a pop server
that will understand maildir, will qpopper do this or will i have to
look at
another?
courier has a separate imap and pop server package that is built around
maildir. I use it with exim.
courier-mta.org
Chad
Which MTA is the recommended one to use on FreeBSD?
I've noticed sendmail is installed by default, but
my book I've been learning FreeBSD from (The Complete
FreeBSD) only covers setting up postfix. Should I
go ahead a learn/setup sendmail? If so, where's
a good place to find a tutorial
Which MTA is the recommended one to use on FreeBSD?
I've noticed sendmail is installed by default, but
my book I've been learning FreeBSD from (The Complete
FreeBSD) only covers setting up postfix. Should I
go ahead a learn/setup sendmail? If so, where's
a good place to find a tutorial
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 08:50:11PM -0600, Michael Madden wrote:
Which MTA is the recommended one to use on FreeBSD?
I've noticed sendmail is installed by default, but
my book I've been learning FreeBSD from (The Complete
FreeBSD) only covers setting up postfix. Should I
go ahead a learn
I'm new to email on FreeBSD. Could someone please advise at what MTA i should use. I
thought courier might be a good choice since it has integrated POP3 and IMAP servers
(bearing in mind i have to serve Outlook clients). I want simple install.
Thank you
Gareth
that
it's much more powerful, but I haven't had any problems with Postfix's
capabilities). Postfix comfortably handles Maildir-style delivery, so it
works fine with Courier-IMAP.
-J
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:58:57 +0200
From: Gareth Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Preferred MTA and mail
PROTECTED]'
Onderwerp: RE: Preferred MTA and mail configuration
I don't know if others have already chimed in, but I recommend Postfix. I
actually use a combination of Postfix + Courier to handle my mailing needs.
Postfix is by all accounts secure, and is much, much easier to configure
than Sendmail
Gareth Bailey wrote:
I'm new to email on FreeBSD. Could someone please advise at what MTA i should use. I thought courier might be a good choice since it has integrated POP3 and IMAP servers (bearing in mind i have to serve Outlook clients). I want simple install.
Thank you
Gareth
Do the daily/weekly/monthly scripts need a lot of tweaking to still
mail reports to root after switching from sendmail to postfix?
Are the changes necessary documented anywhere?
TIA,
Joel
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
