On Sunday 02 November 2003 03:58 am, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 10:40:07AM +0100, R.T.G. TAN wrote:
Hi,
Im trying to install openoffice and am getting
the folling:
Try /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-devel
This builds and installs nicely.
--
Best regards
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:23:44 +
Matthew Faircliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I never thought I would see the day, but now I can open Excel and Word
docs in FreeBSD no problem! And its fast!
I'm trashing my Windows partition tonight! Viva BSD!
Why didn't you just get the FreeBSD precompiled
Windows partition tonight! Viva BSD!
Why didn't you just get the FreeBSD precompiled packages for OO-1.1 ??
I did (though I'm not Matthew, so I'm not answering for him), but I can't
get OpenOffice to see my native JDK 1.4.1 installed (from the port) on
-CURRENT. I would be very interested to hear
dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:23:44 +
Matthew Faircliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I never thought I would see the day, but now I can open Excel and Word
docs in FreeBSD no problem! And its fast!
I'm trashing my Windows partition tonight! Viva BSD!
Why didn't you
wouldn't be able to
install packages. I'd have to build everything from source.
Maybe I just don't understand how to use the ports tree 100% yet...
http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice
Native FreeBSD precompiled packages. Good Luck.
--
dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:55:41 -0400, Jesse Guardiani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:23:44 +
Matthew Faircliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I never thought I would see the day, but now I can open Excel and Word
docs in FreeBSD no problem! And its
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:12:14 -0400
Jud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:55:41 -0400, Jesse Guardiani
Maybe I just don't understand how to use the ports tree 100% yet...
If you cvsup the ports tree, you can choose to install from either
ports or packages.
Ports are just a
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:37:55 -0400, Jesse Guardiani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Jud wrote:
[snip]
If you cvsup the ports tree, you can choose to install from either ports
or packages.
Do you run a cvsuped ports tree? I used to run one last year, and I could
never install from a package
Jud wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:37:55 -0400, Jesse Guardiani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Jud wrote:
[snip]
If you cvsup the ports tree, you can choose to install from either
ports or packages.
Do you run a cvsuped ports tree? I used to run one last year, and I could
never install from
the application once the
source code has been downloaded. It has nothing to do with any
precompiled applications that may be available at ftp.freebsd.org or
elsewhere (such as the location for the pre-compiled OpenOffice binary).
Let's use an actual example, the one that started
Hello,
Can anyone tell me if openoffice 1.1 (openoffice-devel) works with the native java
(diablo-jdk13)?
Matthew Faircliff
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Quoting Matthew Faircliff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
Can anyone tell me if openoffice 1.1 (openoffice-devel) works with the native
java (diablo-jdk13)?
Matthew Faircliff
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:59:52 +, Matthew Faircliff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hello,
Can anyone tell me if openoffice 1.1 (openoffice-devel) works with the
native java (diablo-jdk13)?
Matthew Faircliff
I don't know the answer, but would also appreciate one - perhaps slightly
more
]: *** [../../../dist/include/necko] Illegal instruction
(core dumped)
I think this says all. Try another CPUTYPE and let me know the
results.
Jens
I finally compiled openoffice !!! But I have no clue why it worked
this time. So, I gave up on using portinstall and did
make install clean
gmake[4]: *** [../../../dist/include/necko] Illegal instruction
(core dumped)
I think this says all. Try another CPUTYPE and let me know the
results.
Jens
I finally compiled openoffice !!! But I have no clue why it worked
this time. So, I gave up on using portinstall and did
make install clean
I tried three times to compile openoffice-devel (I use 5-1p10) and it
always fails when compiling mozilla - on different places and always
with a core dump. I saw some messages that people are happy with it
(therefore it must be compileable). Do I have to do something special
besaides
ivan georgiev wrote:
I tried three times to compile openoffice-devel (I use 5-1p10) and it
always fails when compiling mozilla - on different places and always
with a core dump. I saw some messages that people are happy with it
(therefore it must be compileable). Do I have to do something
On Monday 13 October 2003 07:05 pm, Jens Rehsack wrote:
ivan georgiev wrote:
I tried three times to compile openoffice-devel (I use 5-1p10)
and it always fails when compiling mozilla - on different places
and always with a core dump. I saw some messages that people are
happy
ivan georgiev wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2003 07:05 pm, Jens Rehsack wrote:
ivan georgiev wrote:
I tried three times to compile openoffice-devel (I use 5-1p10)
and it always fails when compiling mozilla - on different places
and always with a core dump. I saw some messages that people are
happy
On Monday 13 October 2003 07:40 pm, Jens Rehsack wrote:
ivan georgiev wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2003 07:05 pm, Jens Rehsack wrote:
ivan georgiev wrote:
I tried three times to compile openoffice-devel (I use 5-1p10)
and it always fails when compiling mozilla - on different places
ivan georgiev writes:
I tried three times to compile openoffice-devel (I use 5-1p10) and it
always fails when compiling mozilla - on different places and always
with a core dump. I saw some messages that people are happy with it
(therefore it must be compileable). Do I have to do
ivan georgiev wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2003 07:40 pm, Jens Rehsack wrote:
[...]
nsICookieService.idl
../../../dist/bin/xpidl -m header -w -I ../../../dist/idl -I. -o
_xpidlgen/nsICookieService nsICookieService.idl
gmake[4]: *** [../../../dist/include/necko] Illegal instruction (core
dumped)
Robert Huff wrote:
ivan georgiev writes:
I tried three times to compile openoffice-devel (I use 5-1p10) and it
always fails when compiling mozilla - on different places and always
with a core dump. I saw some messages that people are happy with it
(therefore it must be compileable). Do I have
nsICookieService.idl
../../../dist/bin/xpidl -m header -w -I ../../../dist/idl -I. -o
_xpidlgen/nsICookieService nsICookieService.idl
gmake[4]: *** [../../../dist/include/necko] Illegal instruction
(core dumped)
I think this says all. Try another CPUTYPE and let me know the
results.
'../../../../../../unxfbsd.pro/
lib/libsablot.a'
---* TG_SLO.MK *---
dmake: Error code 255, while making './unxfbsd.pro/misc/build/
so_built_so_sablotron'
---* TG_SLO.MK *---
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/
openoffice-devel/work/oo_1.1_src/sablot
dmake: Error code 1
Hello gang,
I'm trying to build openoffice or openoffice-devel from ports.
CVS, portupgrade etc...completed. says there is a checksum mismatch with the OO
source and stop
4.8 stable. It has been broken for about a week and a half.
Am I correct in saying the 2 ports are broken because
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 09:38:24 -0500, Aaron Sloan wrote:
I'm trying to build openoffice or openoffice-devel from ports.
CVS, portupgrade etc...completed. says there is a checksum mismatch with the OO
source and stop
4.8 stable. It has been broken for about a week and a half.
First off, I'd
Aaron Sloan wrote:
Am I correct in saying the 2 ports are broken because of the checksum problem? I'm
not really interested in using NO_CHECKSUM=YES
I also removed /usr/ports/editors/openoffice and openoffice-devel and ran CVS again
with the same results.
Was my troubleshooting ok?
You get
Hello all,
I am attempting to build OpenOffice from ports.
(Running FreeBSD 5.1-p5) So far I've been able to
figure out how to fix everything else that
stopped the build, but this just leaves me lost.
I don't have a clue what this refers to. The
script capture of the error message
was
going to say 3 days.
--
Todd Stephens
You could get a package for OpenOffice at:
http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/
This worked for me and of course only took a short while to install.
Nathan
--
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys D8527E49
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Monday 15 September 2003 04:15 am, Nathan Kinkade wrote:
You could get a package for OpenOffice at:
http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/
This worked for me and of course only took a short while to install.
I should have gone that route, but with an app so big and complex I felt
I was better
I am installing this from ports. Considering everything else that is
getting installed along with it (gcc 3.2.3 among others), how long
should I expect this to take? Anyone have any experience with this?
Running a K6-2 500Mhz (FBSD 4.8)
--
Todd Stephens
ICQ# 3150790
A witty saying proves
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 02:06:38PM -0400, Todd Stephens wrote:
I am installing this from ports. Considering everything else that is
getting installed along with it (gcc 3.2.3 among others), how long
should I expect this to take? Anyone have any experience with this?
Running a K6-2 500Mhz
On Sunday 14 September 2003 02:20 pm, you wrote:
I installed it on a 533MHz Celeron and it took about 24 hours. Give
or take. Make sure you have lots of disk space for it. Oh, and I
think it was 4.7-RELEASE I used, so not gcc3.
Wow! Thanks for the speedy response. My original message
Do you have linprocfs mounted?
I think it's required for 4.6.2
I just mounted it anyway, to try that:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ ls -la /compat/linux/proc
total 4
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Sep 18 2002 .
drwxr-xr-x 12 root wheel 512 Sep 18 2002 ..
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ sudo
We just downloaded and installed the Linux binary of OOo 1.1rc3
on my wife's FreeBSD 4.8 box with no problems. My 4.6.2 box,
however, doesn't want to play.
I untar the install files into a directory in my home directory, run
./setup and it puts up an unpacking window (box opening and
progress
On Sunday 07 September 2003 03:41 pm, David Gerard wrote:
We just downloaded and installed the Linux binary of OOo 1.1rc3
on my wife's FreeBSD 4.8 box with no problems. My 4.6.2 box,
however, doesn't want to play.
I untar the install files into a directory in my home directory, run
./setup
On 09/07/03 20:50, T Kellers wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2003 03:41 pm, David Gerard wrote:
We just downloaded and installed the Linux binary of OOo 1.1rc3
on my wife's FreeBSD 4.8 box with no problems. My 4.6.2 box,
however, doesn't want to play.
The thing is, this is the *exact* same
solve the problem
and the second problem:
I have installed openoffice as a package, it works ok until I try to open doc
files, then it says
error loading document; error creating object; the file could not be created
with txt files it works fine, but also cannot save them (nor any other file
variable :
vim ~/.bashrc :
export USE_LANG=fr_FR.ISO_8859-15 (for french ...)
And then I got the OpenOffice package from :
http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/
Install it with the pkg_add command :
pkg_add openoffice-1.0.3_2.tbz
That's all ;-)
It's not the answer to your question
I've downloaded the binaries for OpenOffice (openoffice-1.0.3_2.tgz) but
now I'm not sure how to install this tgz file.
Can I use pkg_add openoffice-1.0.3_2 and if so, where do I place the tgz
file?
Or must I use another way?
-(there's no install file in the tgz)-
--
dick -- http://www.nagual.st
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
I've downloaded the binaries for OpenOffice (openoffice-1.0.3_2.tgz) but
now I'm not sure how to install this tgz file.
Can I use pkg_add openoffice-1.0.3_2
Yes, though I guess you will be asked to download some other
things, too. For more information
Rob Lahaye ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030606 12:58]:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
visit:
http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice
and you can download a pre-built package.
Why has this not yet become part of the precompiled package
selection of FreeBSD, so that everyone can find it where one
expect
Larry Rosenman wrote:
visit:
http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice
and you can download a pre-built package.
Why has this not yet become part of the precompiled package
selection of FreeBSD, so that everyone can find it where one
expect it to be found?
Regards,
Rob
Hello,
I'm having a problem building the openoffice port. The build fails
deep in the bowels of a mozilla build. Since I have the 1.3.1 Mozilla
port installed on my 4-STABLE box, I'm wondering why it's attempting
to install another mozilla.
As always, thanks for your help and support
...]
sed [-an] [-i extension] [-e script] ... [-f script_file] ... [file...]
It appears your version of sed is different than the one on my system (where
openoffice makes/installs fine. My version of sed comes from:
FreeBSD elkanah.its.unimelb.edu.au 4.8-RC
FreeBSD
] ... [file...]
It appears your version of sed is different than the one on my system (where
openoffice makes/installs fine. My version of sed comes from:
FreeBSD elkanah.its.unimelb.edu.au 4.8-RC
FreeBSD 4.8-RC #1: Wed Mar 12 15:00:01 EST 2003
I am guessing that your FreeBSD
Hi,
Does anyone have any ideas on this?
Anthony
On Thursday 03 April 2003 08:16, CARTER Anthony wrote:
Hi,
I had a bit of a problem with the new openoffice 1.0.2. It stops out with
the following:
=== Installing for openoffice-1.0.2_2
=== openoffice-1.0.2_2 depends on file: /usr/local
CARTER Anthony wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any ideas on this?
Anthony
On Thursday 03 April 2003 08:16, CARTER Anthony wrote:
Hi,
I had a bit of a problem with the new openoffice 1.0.2. It stops out with
the following:
=== Installing for openoffice-1.0.2_2
=== openoffice-1.0.2_2 depends
I've been running into a different problem than that one:
-bash-2.05b# make install
=== Installing for openoffice-1.0.2_2
Initializing installation program..
*** Error code 1 (ignored)
=== Generating temporary packing list
=== Add wrapper scripts
sed: illegal option -- i
usage: sed
PROTECTED] sed -h
sed: illegal option -- h
usage: sed script [-Ean] [-i extension] [file ...]
sed [-an] [-i extension] [-e script] ... [-f script_file] ... [file...]
It appears your version of sed is different than the one on my system (where
openoffice makes/installs fine. My version of sed comes
You tried installing sed? It fixed that one for me...
Anthony
On Friday 04 April 2003 02:17, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet
Service. To view the original message content, open the attached
message. If the text doesn't display
on my system (where
openoffice makes/installs fine. My version of sed comes from:
FreeBSD elkanah.its.unimelb.edu.au 4.8-RC
FreeBSD 4.8-RC #1: Wed Mar 12 15:00:01 EST 2003
I am guessing that your FreeBSD is older than that yes?
- jacob
In the past, the system sed didn't
Hi,
I had a bit of a problem with the new openoffice 1.0.2. It stops out with the
following:
=== Installing for openoffice-1.0.2_2
=== openoffice-1.0.2_2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.6.1 - found
#
# UGLY hack to not have to specify a X-Display.
#
/usr/X11R6/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 12:22:53AM -0500, Jason Morgan wrote:
I have been trying to build OpenOffice 1.0.2 for the last couple days,
and this is what I get. I have tried cvsuping my source, reinstalling
all installed packages, and whatever else I could think of. Still no go.
Also, I finally
I have been trying to build OpenOffice 1.0.2 for the last couple days,
and this is what I get. I have tried cvsuping my source, reinstalling
all installed packages, and whatever else I could think of. Still no go.
Also, I finally decided to use the 1.0.1 package available at OO.org,
and writer
Hello,
I am getting this error when trying to build openoffice cvsupped yesterday.
snip
|Index: share/tools/hprof/hprof_site.c
|===
|RCS file: /data/java/JDK2/javasrc/src/share/tools/hprof/hprof_site.c,v
|retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
On Sunday, 16 March 2003 at 21:28:42 +0200, Ian Barnes wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build the latest version of openoffice (cvsupped earlier). I
get this error bellow, i am runing a 5.0 Rel system with X4, and KDE 3.1
snip
=== Extracting for mozilla-1.0.2_1
Checksum mismatch for mozilla
Hi,
I am trying to build the latest version of openoffice (cvsupped earlier). I
get this error bellow, i am runing a 5.0 Rel system with X4, and KDE 3.1
snip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/editors/openoffice # make install
REQUIREMENTS:
OO requires that the ENV variable LANG
is set to a proper
Hi,
I have compiled OpenOffice 1.0.2 using the ports (first the English and then
the Portuguese one). Everything worked fine aparently. Afterwards I found out
that I am unable to type very commum specific Portuguese accents such as ã ô
é (absolutely nothing happens when I press the keys) etc
Hello guys and gals,
Im running Freebsd 5.0 on my laptop, because it does find my cardbus
network card. Unlikely with linux.
I need to run an office package for school and i dont want to use
windows. So i installed fbsd5.0, but
when i install openoffice from the tarballs given on the site
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Izzy wrote:
Hello guys and gals,
Im running Freebsd 5.0 on my laptop, because it does find my cardbus
network card. Unlikely with linux.
I need to run an office package for school and i dont want to use
windows. So i installed fbsd5.0, but
when i install openoffice
Several times I have found that running OpenOffice 1.0 on FreeBSD 4.7
has corrupted my Mozilla settings. The contents of .mozilla looks intact,
but it refuses to recognize my profile. I have to build a new profile,
and move
over my bookmarks and mail folders.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386
found that running OpenOffice 1.0 on FreeBSD 4.7
has corrupted my Mozilla settings. The contents of .mozilla looks intact,
but it refuses to recognize my profile. I have to build a new profile,
and move
over my bookmarks and mail folders.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.1
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:19:23PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I, too, had the same problem with the amount of
space needed to install openoffice. The partition holding
/usr/ports was way too small on my machine. I finally cheated
and copied the ports directory to a different (and larger
/ports/distfiles thats i what i did.
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 06:35 pm, Eduardo Huertas wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install openoffice-es and I got stuck here:
=== Extracting for es-openoffice-1.0.2
=== es-openoffice-1.0.2 depends on executable: gcc32 - found
=== es-openoffice
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 23:35, Eduardo Huertas wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install openoffice-es and I got stuck here:
=== Extracting for es-openoffice-1.0.2
=== es-openoffice-1.0.2 depends on executable: gcc32 - found
=== es-openoffice-1.0.2 depends on executable: zip - found
=== es
Hello-
I am trying to install openoffice from the ports on to a machine that only has a
4 gig hard drive. During the installation it say it requires at least 4 gigs of
free space to install. Obviously i cannot have that much free space, is there a
way to get it installed on this computer with my
I would suggest installing staroffice instead. You can install it from
binaries so you don't have to compile it. In my experience it runs a
lot faster better than openoffice as well. I had installed
openoffice but wound up dumping it in favor of staroffice myself.
On Tuesday 18 February
From: Brian Henning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openoffice too large
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:30:02 -0600
Hello-
I am trying to install openoffice from the ports on to a machine that only
has a
4 gig hard drive. During the installation it say it requires at least 4
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Brian Henning wrote:
Hello-
I am trying to install openoffice from the ports on to a machine that only has a
4 gig hard drive. During the installation it say it requires at least 4 gigs of
free space to install. Obviously i cannot have that much free space
Hi,
I'm trying to install openoffice-es and I got stuck here:
=== Extracting for es-openoffice-1.0.2
=== es-openoffice-1.0.2 depends on executable: gcc32 - found
=== es-openoffice-1.0.2 depends on executable: zip - found
=== es-openoffice-1.0.2 depends on executable: unzip - found
From: Brian Henning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openoffice too large
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:30:02 -0600
Hello-
I am trying to install openoffice from the ports on to a machine that only
has a
4 gig hard drive. During the installation it say it requires at least 4
I have a quick question to the openoffice geru's.
I've installed the current version of openoffice (1.0.1) from the ports
collection. I am trying to make some slides by using the Drawing window
(from the New icon). After creating a slide, I can create a postscript file.
However, it does
OpenOffice is failing to build from ports. I have attached the last
~300 lines of output from a build.
d80h149:/usr/ports/editors/openoffice#uname -a
FreeBSD d80h149.xx.xx.edu 4.7-STABLE FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE #3: Mon Feb 3
03:41:33 EST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELLGX400
i386
failed unexpectedly.
Please report the problem to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [maintainer] and attach the
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice/work/oo_1.0.2_src/config_office/config.log
including the output of the failure of your make command.
Also, it might
be a good idea to provide an overview of all
packages
/javac not found set with_jdk_home
do you have java installed [properly]?
=== Script configure failed unexpectedly.
Please report the problem to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [maintainer] and attach the
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice/work/oo_1.0.2_src/config_office/config.log
including the output
configure failed unexpectedly.
Please report the problem to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [maintainer] and attach
the
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice/work/oo_1.0.2_src/config_office/config.log
including the output of the failure of your make command.
Also, it might
be a good idea to provide an overview
/lib/libgkconbase_s.a ../../dist/lib/libgkconshared_s.a
../..
/dist/lib/libgkconsvgdoc_s.a ../../dist/lib/libgkcontentsvg_s.a
-Wl,--no-whole-
archive -L../../dist/bin -L../../dist/lib -lgkgfx -L../../dist/bin -lxpcom
-lic
onv -L../../dist/bin
-L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice/work/mozilla/work
Hello list,
I am running 4.7 Stable #5, from 11/17/2002. I
downloaded the Open Office package for 4.7-stable.
Ahead of time, I installed the port dependencies for
the Open Office port (jdk13, etc.)
Upon executing openoffice, I see:
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:
/usr/local/OpenOffice.org1.0/program
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:47:19AM +0100, Alex Huth wrote:
Sorry, in the first message I?ve forgotten the topic
Hi guys!
I want to install openoffice from the ports. When i try this iget the
following error:
helpcontent_49_unix.tgz doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports/distfiles
Daniel Harris wrote:
Note that http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ has binary packages
which won't require those 4GB :-)
So being likewise strapped for diskspace, I used the package also.
It looks nice, but I am having a couple of problems.
I can only run it as root/with sudo. It crashes
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:00:59PM -0800, paul beard wrote:
Daniel Harris wrote:
Note that http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ has binary packages
which won't require those 4GB :-)
So being likewise strapped for diskspace, I used the package also.
It looks nice, but I am having
Does anyone know what file the installer might be finding that
prevents it from reinstalling? I am giving up the FreeBSD package
and trying the linux version, but whatever I deleted when cleaning
up the old install left something that makes subsequent install
runs think there's an installation
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 09:43:51PM -0800, paul beard wrote:
Does anyone know what file the installer might be finding that
prevents it from reinstalling? I am giving up the FreeBSD package
and trying the linux version, but whatever I deleted when cleaning
up the old install left something
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 09:43:51PM -0800, paul beard wrote:
Does anyone know what file the installer might be finding that
prevents it from reinstalling? I am giving up the FreeBSD package
and trying the linux version, but whatever I deleted when cleaning
up the old install left something
Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Look for a file called .install_done in the appropriate work
directory under the port you want to remove. If you see it..
delete it.
I didn't use the port: that never worked for me. So I have tried
the FreeBSD tarball/installer and the linux variant. Neither are
quite
Scott Robbins wrote:
In the home directory---there's an openoffice.bin or perhaps
soffice.bin
or even .openoffice.bin, something like that--the file that's most
likely causing you trouble though is something .sversionrc in
the home
directory.
Go to the head of the class: that was it. The
I have FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE installed on a Pentium III
machine and I installed OpenOffice but when ever I try
and open up a Word2000 document that I saved on my
Windows machine, OpenOffice closes sayin an
unrecoverable error. Has anyone else experienced this
and know what's causing it? Or how
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 05:31:18PM -0800, Ted Brenner wrote:
I have FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE installed on a Pentium III
machine and I installed OpenOffice but when ever I try
and open up a Word2000 document that I saved on my
Windows machine, OpenOffice closes sayin an
unrecoverable error. Has
I notice that when I start a new text document in StarOffice or
OpenOffice I get one font list (Truetype included) but when I start an
html document I get a much longer list of choices. It seems like some
font directories - such as freefont nucleus - are ignored for text
documents.
Has anyone
Does anybody know just what is required to install OpenOffice on FBSD 4.7.
I think their message that 4Gb is required is a little naive just where
should this 4gb be available.
I have a 10gb disk: ad0s1= ad0s1e (/usr/local - 3.7gb); ad0s2=4gb K(but
this includes /,/tmp/,/usr (2.7gb),/var
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-27 13:16:22 -0500:
Does anybody know just what is required to install OpenOffice on FBSD 4.7.
I think their message that 4Gb is required is a little naive just where
should this 4gb be available.
unless you have fiddled with the ports system, it builds
that http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ has binary packages
which won't require those 4GB :-)
--
Daniel Harris
msg06761/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Daniel Harris wrote:
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:45:41 -0500
From: Daniel Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: openoffice install
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 07:40:24PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
I have a 10gb disk: ad0s1= ad0s1e (/usr/local
At 01:45 PM 10/27/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Note that http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ has binary packages
which won't require those 4GB :-)
Thanks for the tip, Daniel.
I kind-of liked using portupgrade. It seems silly to need that much space
for and installation. And I thought that MicroSlop
At 02:26 PM 10/27/2002 -0500, you wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Daniel Harris wrote:
Note that http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ has binary packages
which won't require those 4GB :-)
--
Daniel Harris
Wow! Thanks for the pointer - it runs like a top.
The installation was incredibly
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 01:16:22PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know just what is required to install OpenOffice on FBSD 4.7.
I think their message that 4Gb is required is a little naive just where
should this 4gb be available.
On the partition on which you are building
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 15:34:07 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Daniel Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: openoffice install
At 01:45 PM 10/27/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Note that http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ has
I just installed OpenOffice on my 4.7-STABLE. Started it for the first
time by typing openoffice into a rxvt, and got the word processor. I
thought I might investigate a bit, so I went into the File menu, chose
AutoPilot, Presentation, and OO didn't like it. It's been sitting there
for a few
601 - 700 of 732 matches
Mail list logo
