On Wednesday 08 September 2004 02:28 pm, Mark Rowlands wrote:
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-gtk2-1.14.1
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: mod_jk2-apache2-2.0.2
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: mod_rpaf-ap2-0.5
Done.
On Thursday 02 September 2004 04:02 pm, Dan Finn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 23:22:26 +0100, Steve Hodgson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 02 September 2004 19:34, Dan Finn wrote:
[ root @ stewie : /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade] : portupgrade
ruby [Failed
[ Maintainer of lang/ruby18 amd sysutils/portupgrade CC'd ]
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 02:05:40AM -0700, Joshua Tinnin wrote:
On Thursday 02 September 2004 04:02 pm, Dan Finn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 23:22:26 +0100, Steve Hodgson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 02
On Thursday 02 September 2004 02:34 pm, Dan Finn wrote:
[ root @ stewie : /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade] : portupgrade ruby
[Failed `Inappropriate file type or format'] [Updating the portsdb
format:bdb1_btree in /usr/ports ... - 11725 port entries found
I hate to add a me too, but, well, me too. I'm running
5.2.1-RELEASE, not
running portindex, and didn't have trouble until the instructions
from /usr/ports/UPDATING. Haven't tried to move and re-cvsup
/usr/ports. Anyone else have success via this route?
Evan
Nope, didn't work for me
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 08:18:04PM +0100, Steve Hodgson wrote:
I've removed the ports tree and that didn't work. Given that it appears to
be a problem in the ports tree (someone [sorry, I've deleted the email] said
they have narrowed it down), I was planning on leaving it for now and just
On Friday 03 September 2004 12:38 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 08:18:04PM +0100, Steve Hodgson wrote:
I've removed the ports tree and that didn't work. Given that it appears
to be a problem in the ports tree (someone [sorry, I've deleted the
email] said they have
Hey Kent,
I am only seeing it on 5.3-beta. I use portindex to genereate INDEX on my 4.x
machines and ruby isn't dumping on them.
One of my 4.10-p2 servers exhibited the same behaviour with portsdb -u
(after 'make index' in /usr/ports).
Haven't touched the rest, yet... ;-)
Kaboom, it said...
On Friday 03 September 2004 01:04 pm, Nico Meijer wrote:
Hey Kent,
I am only seeing it on 5.3-beta. I use portindex to genereate INDEX on my
4.x machines and ruby isn't dumping on them.
One of my 4.10-p2 servers exhibited the same behaviour with portsdb -u
(after 'make index' in
On Friday 03 September 2004 01:04 pm, Nico Meijer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Kent,
I am only seeing it on 5.3-beta. I use portindex to genereate INDEX
on my 4.x machines and ruby isn't dumping on them.
One of my 4.10-p2 servers exhibited the same behaviour with portsdb
-u (after 'make
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:29:23PM -0500, Jeff Hinrichs wrote:
Dan Finn wrote:
snip
I thought I had seen an email to the list that the bug was found; and
a fix committed. I waited a couple of hours, ran make update,
etcetera; and this resulted:
# portsdb -Uu
Updating the ports index ...
On Thursday 02 September 2004 19:34, Dan Finn wrote:
[ root @ stewie : /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade] : portupgrade ruby
[Failed `Inappropriate file type or format'] [Updating the portsdb
format:bdb1_btree in /usr/ports ... - 11725 port entries found
I ended up having to move /usr/ports out of the way and doing a fresh
cvsup. I am not sure why but this fixed it.
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 23:22:26 +0100, Steve Hodgson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 02 September 2004 19:34, Dan Finn wrote:
[ root @ stewie : /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade] :
On Thursday, September 02, 2004 4:30:57 PM Dan Finn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 11:34:44 -0700
|From: Dan Finn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: portupgrade, portsdb -U failing, ruby dumping core
|To: FreeBSD-Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Content-Type:
Try running it using strace, such as strace portupgrade vim and see
what it's doing.
I checked my kernel and found the PROCFS and PSUEDOFS options were in
there. I have added this line to my fstab:
proc/procprocfs rw00
I no longer see this message:
# strace portupgrade vim
Adam Smith wrote:
Try running it using strace, such as strace portupgrade vim and see what
it's doing.
Sorry I didn't get a chance to reply yesterday. I now have the strace
port installed but have hit a small problem (as mentioned by Joshua
Tinnin). I'm not familiar with strace either and is the
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 12:21:09AM +0100, James Brown said:
Whenever I run portupgrade, I wait about 30 seconds only to see it die:
# portupgrade clamav
Killed
# portupgrade vim
Killed
Try running it using strace, such as strace portupgrade vim and see what
it's doing.
--
Adam Smith
In /usr/ports/UPDATING, there is a note about upgrading from an older version
of Ruby to the latest. Have you been reading UPDATING?
You might want to try what's there for this problem before you spend a lot of
time troubleshooting...
On Monday 23 August 2004 07:21 pm, James Brown wrote:
On Monday 23 August 2004 04:25 pm, Adam Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 12:21:09AM +0100, James Brown said:
Whenever I run portupgrade, I wait about 30 seconds only to see it die:
# portupgrade clamav
Killed
# portupgrade vim
Killed
Try running it using
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 12:14:23PM -0400, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Situation:
I set up a portal server as per the instructions at their site; it
involved installing some PERL modules from CPAN, which I have since
learned on FreeBSD appears to be a no no...
Now I have some updates to do,
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Situation:
I set up a portal server as per the instructions at their site; it
involved installing some PERL modules from CPAN, which I have since
learned on FreeBSD appears to be a no no...
Now I have some updates to do, but I don't want it to interfere with
the web
On Monday 26 July 2004 05:20 am, Mark Ovens wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade kde (the meta-port), 3.1.2-3.2.3_1 using
portupgrade(1) but it fails trying to install kdelibs.
Can anyone shed any light on what's wrong?
FreeBSD redshift 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #2: Sun Jul 25
19:19:46 BST
Kent Stewart wrote:
Hi Mark,
On a 2nd read, I thought I was kind of sharp.
No problem. I saw the message:
=== kdelibs-3.2.3_1 conflicts with installed package(s):
kdebase-3.1.2
They install files into the same place.
Please remove them first with
On Monday 26 July 2004 07:33 am, Mark Ovens wrote:
Kent Stewart wrote:
Hi Mark,
On a 2nd read, I thought I was kind of sharp.
No problem. I saw the message:
=== kdelibs-3.2.3_1 conflicts with installed package(s):
kdebase-3.1.2
They install files into
Kent Stewart wrote:
Kdelibs has the new files and when you try to update kdebase later, it
messes up the install. That is why you have to delete kdebase first. If
the files had been moved from kdelibs into kdebase, it wouldn't have
mattered.
Ah, I see. OK, I'll give it a spin. Thanks for the
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 11:20:10PM -0500, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
Rob wrote:
When I use commands from the portupgrade port, I get this message:
Stale dependency: kde-3.2.3 -- autoconf-2.57_1 -- manually run
'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force.
I wanted to use the
Rob wrote:
Hi,
When I use commands from the portupgrade port, I get this message:
Stale dependency: kde-3.2.3 -- autoconf-2.57_1 -- manually run
'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force.
I wanted to use the '-O' option, but that does not seem to exist.
I've tried 'pkgdb -O' or 'pkgdb -FO'
Is
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Edward Ajhar wrote:
I don't seem to be able to install ports any longer. This is what
happens, for example,
# portinstall astro/xworld
--- Session started at: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:30:03 -0400
** None has been installed or upgraded.
--- Session ended at: Sun, 18 Jul
--
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:28:07 -0500 (CDT)
From: Jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Edward Ajhar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: portupgrade/portinstall problem
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Edward Ajhar wrote:
I don't seem to be able to install ports any longer. This is what
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:58:36 -0400
dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've deleted the entire ports tree, and rerun cvsup, refetched the entire
tree, reran portsdb -Uu and am still getting the same index generation
error, this is not occurring on the same package, which leads me to believe
i've
How about reinstalling portupgrade and its dependencies,
ruby18 and ruby18-bdb1?
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:17:23 -0400
dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. I tried your suggestion, but i am still getting a
problem. Again it's not failing with any one particular package,
Hello,
Thanks for your suggestion. I tried an uninstall/reinstall, but am still
getting the error. It's an error code1, not when making a specific package
during the portsdb -Uu but the process can not complete successfully.
Thanks.
Dave.
___
[EMAIL
On Thursday 01 July 2004 09:44 pm, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
Hi,
I have just committed a fix against the undefined method `each' for
nil:NilClass error that occurs typically when BEFORE_DEINSTALL is
not defined in pkgtools.conf. Add BEFORE_DEINSTALL = {} to your
pkgtools.conf and pkg_deinstall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You're not alone. I'm seeing the same problem on my FreeBSD systems.
Joey
On July 1, 2004 17:11, Lee Dilkie wrote:
Well, I'm at a bit of a loss here.
running 4.10, did a cvsup this morning, then portsdb -uU to get an up to
date index.
Bunch
Did you both upgrade 'portupgrade' and then the problem started?
I'm running portupgrade rev.1.225 with no problems.
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 16:22, Joey Mingrone wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You're not alone. I'm seeing the same problem on my FreeBSD systems.
Joey
Did you both upgrade 'portupgrade' and then the problem started?
I'm running portupgrade rev.1.225 with no problems.
yes. I saw from portversion that portupgrade was bumped so i ran
portupgrade -rv portupgrade first.
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 16:22, Joey Mingrone wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On July 1, 2004 17:26, Bruce Hunter wrote:
Did you both upgrade 'portupgrade' and then the problem started?
Yeah, problems stared after upgrading to portupgrade-20040701. I'm guessing
there will be another update shortly.
Joey
I'm running
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joey Mingrone
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 4:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Bruce Hunter
Subject: Re: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method 'each'
fornil:NilClass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
On Thursday 01 July 2004 03:44 pm, Lee Dilkie wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joey
Mingrone Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 4:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Bruce Hunter
Subject: Re: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joey Mingrone
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 4:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Bruce Hunter
Subject: Re: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method 'each'
fornil:NilClass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On July 1, 2004 17:26, Bruce
On Thursday 01 July 2004 01:34 pm, Joey Mingrone wrote:
On July 1, 2004 17:26, Bruce Hunter wrote:
Did you both upgrade 'portupgrade' and then the problem started?
Yeah, problems stared after upgrading to portupgrade-20040701. I'm
guessing there will be another update shortly.
I haven't
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 04:44:57PM -0400, Lee Dilkie wrote:
Then the fun of trying to upgrade portupgrade when it won't uninstall will begin...
Anticipating that I'll need some directions on how to do this manually.
It isn't difficult:
# pkg_delete portupgrade-20040701
# cd
Hi,
I have just committed a fix against the undefined method `each' for
nil:NilClass error that occurs typically when BEFORE_DEINSTALL is not
defined in pkgtools.conf. Add BEFORE_DEINSTALL = {} to your
pkgtools.conf and pkg_deinstall will start working again.
For the undefined method `' for
Alright, I feel stupid but I'm going to ask anyway...
Portversion exists in /usr/local/sbin on one FreeBSD 5.2.1 server, but
not on the other, which is an install off the *same CD*. What package or
port does portversion come from?
Thanks
::-Original Message-
::From: Randy Pratt
Alright, I feel stupid but I'm going to ask anyway...
Portversion exists in /usr/local/sbin on one FreeBSD 5.2.1 server, but
not on the other, which is an install off the *same CD*. What package or
port does portversion come from?
Thanks
--
portversion is part of
[long lines rewrapped, please try to keep lines below about 72
characters]
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 11:34:16PM +, Jarrod Wageman wrote:
Hello, I have a freebsd box I just set up and I am wondering about
some things. I just ran `make buildworld` installworld and all
that after an extensive
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 01:07:45AM -0400, Bruce Hunter wrote:
[...]
Well, that is funny. I do cvsup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile
it updates my ports with the current. I only have graphics/gimp1 and
graphics/gimp-devel.
Why don't I have have graphics/gimp??
What am I doing wrong when updating
Jarrod Wageman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
when running portversion -v -l Nothing returns so I assume this
means no errors, but, after cvsup -v -L 2 supfile updating the index
and the database of ports, and then running portupgrade -a (which
after reading the man page I assume
that it
On Thursday 03 June 2004 07:50 pm, Bruce Hunter wrote:
I am trying to install graphics/gimp-devel
I have never had an error before with the portupgrade -N command
This is my error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] portupgrade -N graphics/gimp-devel/
make: don't know how to make all-depends-list. Stop
**
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 23:03, Kent Stewart wrote:
On Thursday 03 June 2004 07:50 pm, Bruce Hunter wrote:
I am trying to install graphics/gimp-devel
I have never had an error before with the portupgrade -N command
This is my error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] portupgrade -N graphics/gimp-devel/
On Thursday 03 June 2004 10:07 pm, Bruce Hunter wrote:
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 23:03, Kent Stewart wrote:
On Thursday 03 June 2004 07:50 pm, Bruce Hunter wrote:
I am trying to install graphics/gimp-devel
I have never had an error before with the portupgrade -N command
This is my error:
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 00:50, Robin Becker wrote:
Is there a way to list all of my exceptional port settings? Can I make
these available to portupgrade automatically somehow?
portupgrade port settings can be set in the /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf
file.
See MAKE_ARGS in this file.
Cheers,
--
On Saturday 17 April 2004 01:44 am, Jay Moore wrote:
Entering the third week of my portupgrade... some progress has been
made (I think), but several items remain. Last week I was on travel,
but started the following before leaving:
portupgrade -rf textproc/expat2
This completed with the
On Saturday 17 April 2004 09:24 am, Kent Stewart wrote:
What must I do to resolve the KDE install error(s)?
You have to pkg_delete kdebase-3.1.4 before you can update kde to 3.2.1.
The Makefile for kdelibs has CONFLICTS= kdebase-3.1.* and it
won't build until you have deleted kdebase.
On Saturday 17 April 2004 09:33 am, Jay Moore wrote:
On Saturday 17 April 2004 09:24 am, Kent Stewart wrote:
What must I do to resolve the KDE install error(s)?
You have to pkg_delete kdebase-3.1.4 before you can update kde to
3.2.1. The Makefile for kdelibs has CONFLICTS=
I wanted to send my heartfelt thanks to all who chimed in with helpful
suggestions on my portupgrade problem.
I have now learned that ports-all is proably the best option for a
ports-supfile, and I'll have to look into the issue about a refuse file
instead when I want to limit the selection.
I
You're welcome :).
Cheers,
Martin
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 04:51:10PM +0200 or thereabouts, Andreas Davour wrote:
I wanted to send my heartfelt thanks to all who chimed in with helpful
suggestions on my portupgrade problem.
I have now learned that ports-all is proably the
On Saturday 10 April 2004 07:51 am, Andreas Davour wrote:
I wanted to send my heartfelt thanks to all who chimed in with
helpful suggestions on my portupgrade problem.
I have now learned that ports-all is proably the best option for a
ports-supfile, and I'll have to look into the issue about
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Saturday 10 April 2004 07:51 am, Andreas Davour wrote:
Now I think I know how to do these things and after another upgrade I
think I'm ready to at least do the cvsup part using cron.
The hardest part of a cron job is finding that magic time after the hour
that never fails
On Saturday 10 April 2004 12:05 pm, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Saturday 10 April 2004 07:51 am, Andreas Davour wrote:
Now I think I know how to do these things and after another upgrade
I think I'm ready to at least do the cvsup part using cron.
The hardest part of a cron
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Saturday 10 April 2004 12:05 pm, Chuck Swiger wrote:
[ ... ]
I could do the thing but I want the log more than I care if it runs
or not. I could cut back on some of the tee but I see mail after it
runs.
That's OK-- the thing is mostly useful within a one-liner anyway.
On Saturday 10 April 2004 01:17 pm, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Saturday 10 April 2004 12:05 pm, Chuck Swiger wrote:
[ ... ]
I could do the thing but I want the log more than I care if it
runs or not. I could cut back on some of the tee but I see mail
after it runs.
Andreas Davour wrote:
Hi!
I just decided to take a deep breath and cvsup some fresh ports. Now,
having done that I have run 'portupgrade -ar' and constantly found it to
stop some problems.
Some ports have failed and been flagged as configure error or install
error. Then I have tried to do a
On Friday 09 April 2004 11:55 am, Andreas Davour wrote:
Hi!
I just decided to take a deep breath and cvsup some fresh ports. Now,
having done that I have run 'portupgrade -ar' and constantly found it
to stop some problems.
Some ports have failed and been flagged as configure error or
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Andrew L. Gould wrote:
On Friday 09 April 2004 01:55 pm, Andreas Davour wrote:
[snip]
If anyone can shed some light on those matters, then I'm all ears. I can't
get a new version of Firefox to compile without atk so I'm very interested
in getting this to work.
I
Andreas Davour wrote:
Hi!
And it is correct in that there *is* no accessibility/atk port in my new
cvsup'ed ports tree. But why is it then telling me it needs it!?
Because it's a dependancy of about 538 distinct
ports, at least one of which you must have
installed
GNOME, perhaps
Hello,
I am using portupgrade -airR for a long long time without any signs
of trouble :), just for few days I am observing a message from portaudit
regarding of upgrading my Midnight Commander that due to bug in mc (as do
portaudit say) there will be no upgrade :). I thought that that bug
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
It is best to have a ports tree that contains almost
everything except foreign languages when using BSD on
a workstation or in a desktop environment --- there are
so many dependancies.
So I thought. I edited away everything that was
Hi Andreas,
don't you really have atk in /usr/ports/accessibility/atk directory?
Perhaps look into ports-supfile.. do you have there ports-all enabled?
cheers,
Martin
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 08:55:04PM +0200 or thereabouts, Andreas Davour wrote:
And it is correct in
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Kent Stewart wrote:
Firefox depends on gtk-2.4.0, which depends on atk. All of these
problems relate back to updating dependancies of glib-2.4.0.
Ok, that at least explains why atk seems so important.
The question at this point is what you updated and the order. If you
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
Andreas Davour wrote:
Hi!
And it is correct in that there *is* no accessibility/atk port in my new
cvsup'ed ports tree. But why is it then telling me it needs it!?
Because it's a dependancy of about 538 distinct
ports, at least
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Martin Hudec wrote:
Hi Andreas,
don't you really have atk in /usr/ports/accessibility/atk directory?
No.
Perhaps look into ports-supfile.. do you have there ports-all enabled?
No, I have it commented out, since I left all the individual ports
collections in there
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 09:34:09PM +0200, Andreas Davour wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Martin Hudec wrote:
Hi Andreas,
don't you really have atk in /usr/ports/accessibility/atk directory?
No.
Perhaps look into ports-supfile.. do you have there ports-all enabled?
No, I have it
On Friday 09 April 2004 12:34 pm, Andreas Davour wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Martin Hudec wrote:
Hi Andreas,
don't you really have atk in /usr/ports/accessibility/atk
directory?
No.
Perhaps look into ports-supfile.. do you have there ports-all
enabled?
No, I have it commented
Andreas Davour [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That sounds like an important port. I don't understand why I wasn't
getting it when I cvsup'ed then. Is there a line the the ports-supfile
which should read 'ports-accessibility'? Maybe I should add it and cvsup
again.
There probably wasn't such a
Andreas Davour wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Martin Hudec wrote:
Could it be I have made such a basic mistake as to not cvsup'ed a vital
dependedcy?! I kind of figured the newly cvsup'ed port of cvsup would have
included a new example file of ports-supfile if that had been the problem.
One
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 08:55:04PM +0200, Andreas Davour wrote:
** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
! accessibility/atk (atk-1.4.1_1) (port directory error)
And it is correct in that there *is* no accessibility/atk port in my new
cvsup'ed ports tree. But why
Andreas Davour writes:
Well, I started out with a clean 5.2-RELEASE and did cvsup 4 days
ago. I don't remember seeing glib being upgraded, but I guess I
could always try to '-rf glib' if it is a problem.
And on that day, your karma really sucked.
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 09:14:07PM +0200, Andreas Davour wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Andrew L. Gould wrote:
On Friday 09 April 2004 01:55 pm, Andreas Davour wrote:
[snip]
If anyone can shed some light on those matters, then I'm all ears. I can't
get a new version of Firefox to compile
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Gary Kline wrote:
If I can offer a practical tip re cvsu'ing and running 'pkgdb
-Uu', why not script it and run it out of cron? That's how I
make sure tht my ports tree is neat nd clean.
Well, when I have succeeded in doing a portupgrade by hand I think
On Friday 09 April 2004 01:00 pm, Gary Kline wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 09:14:07PM +0200, Andreas Davour wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Andrew L. Gould wrote:
On Friday 09 April 2004 01:55 pm, Andreas Davour wrote:
[snip]
If anyone can shed some light on those matters, then I'm all
On Friday 09 April 2004 01:08 pm, Andreas Davour wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Gary Kline wrote:
If I can offer a practical tip re cvsu'ing and running 'pkgdb
-Uu', why not script it and run it out of cron? That's how I
make sure tht my ports tree is neat nd clean.
Well, when I
On Friday 09 April 2004 01:31 pm, Kent Stewart wrote:
On Friday 09 April 2004 01:08 pm, Andreas Davour wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Gary Kline wrote:
If I can offer a practical tip re cvsu'ing and running 'pkgdb
-Uu', why not script it and run it out of cron? That's how I
make
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:19:47PM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote:
On Friday 09 April 2004 01:00 pm, Gary Kline wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 09:14:07PM +0200, Andreas Davour wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Andrew L. Gould wrote:
On Friday 09 April 2004 01:55 pm, Andreas Davour wrote:
On Friday 09 April 2004 02:22 pm, Gary Kline wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:19:47PM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote:
On Friday 09 April 2004 01:00 pm, Gary Kline wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 09:14:07PM +0200, Andreas Davour wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Andrew L. Gould wrote:
On Friday
The freebsd gnome website suggests downloading their gnome upgrading
script instead of using the standard portupgrade process. In some
cases, they claim that things may break if you don't do it with their
script.
freebsd.org/gnome
Lucas Holt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20040330 17:23]: wrote:
After doing a make install on openssl and then a portupgrade -f
portupgrade, here's what I ran...
server# pkgdb -F
--- Checking the package registry database
server# portsdb -Uu
Updating the ports index ... Generating
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 06:20 am, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
After doing a make install on openssl and then a portupgrade -f
portupgrade, here's what I ran...
server# pkgdb -F
--- Checking the package registry database
server# portsdb -Uu
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp -
On Monday 29 March 2004 12:03 pm, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
I recently ran a portupgrade on one of our servers. The following
error and exchange came up:
server# pkgdb -F
--- Checking the package registry database
Stale dependency: portupgrade-20040325_1 - openssl-0.9.7d
(security/openssl):
On 28 Mar 2004 at 15:20, dave wrote:
Hello,
I've got a system i'm using portupgrade on. I've got a pkgtools.conf
file with make_args defined for ports. I'm using combinations of
portupgrade -arR and various ways of that, yet when it gets to the mod_php4
port portupgrade is trying to
Hello,
Thanks, i tried make rmconfig in lang/php4 and www/mod_php4 and in both
cases it said i had no user defined options. I have also tried using only
the -a and the -ar options to portupgrade, and adding to the make args line
for mod_php4 -DWITH_MYSQL=no all of this has not worked it is still
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, dave wrote:
Thanks, i tried make rmconfig in lang/php4 and www/mod_php4 and in both
cases it said i had no user defined options. I have also tried using only
the -a and the -ar options to portupgrade, and adding to the make args line
for mod_php4 -DWITH_MYSQL=no all of
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 04:05:01PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have had the same problem. Easiest solution is to cd to
/usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade and make deinstall clean install
Once that completes all is well again.
Hi Jon,
Thanks much for the hint! It absolutely did the
Have had the same problem. Easiest solution is to cd to
/usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade and make deinstall clean install
Once that completes all is well again.
Jon Mercer
http://www.achean.com
Hi,
Doing a portupgrade -arR rendered my system (esp. the parts that
refer to ports/packages)
On 2004-03-22T16:31:23+0100, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
So I tried
# pkgdb -F
/usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:35:in `require': No such file to load -- pkgtools (LoadError)
from /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:35
[snip]
I believe that this is related to the bump of ruby from 1.6 to 1.8, but
I could be wrong.
On Monday 22 March 2004 07:31 am, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
Hi,
Doing a portupgrade -arR rendered my system (esp. the parts that
refer to ports/packages) more or less unusable.
Here's what I did:
System is running 4.9
cvsup -g -L 2 ports-supfile
pkgdb -F
portsdb -Uu
cd /usr/ports
samy lancher wrote:
mysql-client-3.23.58 is already installed or may be older version blah blah blah... you can uninstall and reinstall mysql blah blah blah ...to install correctly. If you really want to override without deleting use FORCE_PICG_REGISTER blah blah
I also tried to install php
Hey,
I did make uninstall in usr/ports/databases/mysql323-client. and than i gave the
command
portupgrade -NPRri mod_php4.
This time, mysql-client-4.0.18_1 was installed and at the end of php installation i
got the following error:
--- Registering installation for mysql-client-4.0.18_1
Kirk Strauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 2004-03-22T20:25:54Z, samy lancher writes:
Hey,
Quit top posting.
I did make uninstall in usr/ports/databases/mysql323-client. and than i
gave the command portupgrade -NPRri mod_php4.
This time, mysql-client-4.0.18_1 was installed and at the
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:57:34 -0500
Ralph M. Los [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone ever had this problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]portupgrade mozilla-devel
/usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:35:in `require': No such file to load --
pkgtools (LoadError)
from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:35
Try
701 - 800 of 945 matches
Mail list logo
