-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FreeBSD Daemon wrote:
| Dear list,
|
| What is the difference between mod_perl and mod_perl2 in the port
| collection of 4.10?
|
| TIA
|
| zheyu
| ___
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
|
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 08:23:08PM -0700, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After I first connect via telnet as a user and attempt su,
the response is you are not in the correct group (wheel)
to su root.
Add the user to the wheel group who you
On 2004-08-15 18:04, Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in the kernel configuration one can enable various devices by the
respective 'device' statement. It seems that most drivers go into
the kernel directly. Some drivers such as 'acpi' produce a kernel
module.
How is determined which
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 07:37:53AM +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
Is there some deeper reason why mod_php and php-cli conflict?
I have got mod_php5 and apache2 running and would like to enable
the php command line interface, too. How can I do this?
Install the lang/php5 port which should
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:18:03AM -0500, Will wrote:
FreeBSD Daemon wrote:
| What is the difference between mod_perl and mod_perl2 in the port
| collection of 4.10?
One is the devel version of Mod Perl and the other is the stable -
http://perl.apache.org/download/index.html you might find
I'm looking at getting a 3ware Escalade 7006 or 8006 RAID controller for
one of my servers. The machine presently runs RELENG_4_8. The twe man
page for that version doesn't list the 7000 or 8000 series controllers.
However, 3ware lists 4.8 as the supported version of FreeBSD for both.
Which is
John Oxley wrote:
I have installed anjuta 1.2.2 from ports and am getting some odd errors:
It complains that libtool is not installed but I have installed as
dependencies both libtool13 and libtool15. When I symlink
/usr/local/bin/libtool15 to libtool and do the same for libtoolize, the
On Monday 16 August 2004 14:35, Björn Lindström wrote:
I'm trying to use at(1) on our co-located server, but unless I run
it as root, I get this error:
at: you do not have permission to use this program
I know this isn't how FreeBSD behaves by default, so I'm wondering if
anyone has an idea
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 02:22:02PM -0700, Pat Lashley wrote:
Could you create a user to get them; and give that user a procmail
(or similar) delivery-time script to file them into subdirs based on
some arbitrary characteristic?
Sounds feasible. The sheer volume has overwhelmed me, though,
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 11:56:10AM +0100, Scott Mitchell wrote:
I don't know how committed to qmail you are, but Exim will do this
out of the box. I'm pretty sure it's part of the default config
file. With the exim+exiscan patches (available from ports) you can
get even more
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 07:53:10PM -0700, Kevin Stevens typed:
A lot of network scanners also trigger on NICS in promiscuous mode
(there's a way to detect them, I forget the details at the moment)
because admins want to know if any hosts are out there sniffing.
How sure are you about that?
Promiscuous mode can also be enabled on most hardware routers. A
hardware router in front of a private network with promiscuous mode
enabled allows public internet users to access (sniff) all the
traffic passing through the router as well as insert packets. This
is major security leak and one
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:38:27PM +0800, FreeBSD Daemon wrote:
What is the difference between mod_perl and mod_perl2 in the port
collection of 4.10?
mod_perl works with Apache 1.3; mod_perl2 works with Apache 2. See
http://perl.apache.org/ more for details.
Tom
What can I do about this strange aterm behaviour of NOT showing é or è
but instead it just gives me a ´e of `e whatever I try.
I.e. vim runs fine under xterm, with dead_acute ; dead_diaeresis etc..
but if I start vim (or any other editor) under aterm all those é è ë
stuff is lost. Even a normal
Please don't top-post.
Alex Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I found my problem. Current version of OpenSSL is 0.9.7d. Downloaded
package of it off FreeBSD.org. Question now is, Why is my ports list
so out of date? Just installed system today.
Your ports list has nothing to do with it.
Greetings:
I have a FBSD-4.10 system that I log into using PuTTY (on a Win2K
workstation). I am able to set PuTTY's scrollback to 1200 lines.
When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If possible
I'd like to set the scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least).
Question: How
Hey All,
I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC. I
downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the Canadian
FreeBSD FTP site. After burning the image to CD, I checked the
checksums, which were the same.
When I put the CD in the drive and attempt to boot from
-Original Message-
From: Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 8:59 AM
To: freebsd-questions
Subject: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?
Greetings:
I have a FBSD-4.10 system that I log into using PuTTY (on a Win2K
workstation). I am able to
--- Paulo Roberto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happened to it? I couldn't find it...
While I certainly do not mean it to be as abrasive as
the site proclaims (I am not saying that you are
either an idiot, nor stupid)... google is good.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Mike wrote:
When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If possible
I'd like to set the scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least).
Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10?
That depends on the console program you're
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:09:30PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Mike wrote:
When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If possible
I'd like to set the scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least).
Question: How do I increase the
K. Greenwood wrote:
While I certainly do not mean it to be as abrasive as
the site proclaims (I am not saying that you are
either an idiot, nor stupid)... google is good.
http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search?query=galleryas_sitesearch=freebsd.org
Good luck.
If you are going post on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JJB wrote:
| Promiscuous mode can also be enabled on most hardware routers. A
| hardware router in front of a private network with promiscuous mode
| enabled allows public internet users to access (sniff) all the
| traffic passing through the router as
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 07:32:40PM -0500, Jorge Mario G. wrote:
Hi there
I Have a card that is supported by the ndisulator
but it sais it's only available in -CURRENT
I'm running FreeBSD-5.2.1-p9
is there any way to install the ndisulator?
http://www.freebsddiary.org/ibm-thinkpad-t41.php
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 8:59 AM
To: freebsd-questions
Subject: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?
Greetings:
I have a FBSD-4.10 system that I log into using PuTTY (on a Win2K
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:09:30PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Mike wrote:
When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If possible
I'd like to set the scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least).
Question: How do I increase the
Hello,
I'm trying to install subversion on a 5.x box. I've got a current ports
tree and running perl 5.85. I've tried:
make WITH_PERL=yes WITH_APACHE2_APR=yes install clean
because i want to be able to access subversion via the apache web server
interface. I'm getting an error:
The following appeared in my latest daily security run output:
Checking for uids of 0:
root 0
toor 0
This is the first time I've seen this message.
I checked /etc/passwd and found this:
root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh
toor:*:0:0:Bourne-again
Hey All,
I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC. I
downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the
Canadian
FreeBSD FTP site. After burning the image to CD, I checked the
checksums, which were the same.
When I put the CD in the drive and
Hi James,
The following appeared in my latest daily security run output:
Checking for uids of 0:
root 0
toor 0
This is the first time I've seen this message.
I checked /etc/passwd and found this:
root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh
--- Aaron Myles Landwehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
K. Greenwood wrote:
While I certainly do not mean it to be as abrasive
as
the site proclaims (I am not saying that you are
either an idiot, nor stupid)... google is good.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James A. Coulter wrote:
| The following appeared in my latest daily security run output:
|
| Checking for uids of 0:
| root 0
| toor 0
|
| This is the first time I've seen this message.
|
| I checked /etc/passwd and found this:
|
|
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:57:37AM -0500, James A. Coulter wrote:
The following appeared in my latest daily security run output:
Checking for uids of 0:
root 0
toor 0
This is the first time I've seen this message.
I checked /etc/passwd and found this:
Hey Guys,
The CD's both have valid data structures (i.e. directories, etc...).
I'm positive that I burnt the image correctly, as it's not just an
.ISO file and the checksums check out correctly.
I checked for the options in the BIOD but they're not there. The BIOS
is Compaq Computer Corporation
The following appeared in my latest daily security run output:
Checking for uids of 0:
root 0
toor 0
This is the first time I've seen this message.
I checked /etc/passwd and found this:
root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh
toor:*:0:0:Bourne-again
In the last episode (Aug 16), Ruben de Groot said:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 07:53:10PM -0700, Kevin Stevens typed:
A lot of network scanners also trigger on NICS in promiscuous mode
(there's a way to detect them, I forget the details at the moment)
because admins want to know if any hosts
I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC. I
downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the
Canadian
FreeBSD FTP site. After burning the image to CD, I checked the
checksums, which were the same.
When I put the CD in the drive and attempt to
After reading that, I think it might be possible that I burnt the
images correctly, but I simply did not make the CD's bootable. I was
using k3b to burn the images, but I might just have a go at it with
Nero. Thanks!
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:23:08 -0400, Ralph Hempel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After reading that, I think it might be possible that I burnt the
images correctly, but I simply did not make the CD's bootable. I was
using k3b to burn the images, but I might just have a go at it with
Nero. Thanks!
The CD image that you download from the FreeBSD site is already a
Yeah, right after I sent that email I read about the image already
being bootable. I supposed I should do my homework before making my
posts:)
Anyways, the image is burnt correctly, so I'm back to where I started
with no idea how to move forward...
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:36:47 -0400 (EDT),
Hi,
I upgraded the php4 port on this 4.8-RELEASE box to 4.3.8_2. I'm also
using apache+mod_ssl-1.3.31+2.8.19.
When the lines
LoadModule php4_modulelibexec/apache/libphp4.so
AddModule mod_php4.c
are uncommented, apache segfaults on startup.
We're not in a position to upgrade to a newer
On 2004-08-16 09:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:09:30PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Mike wrote:
When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If
possible I'd like to set the scroll back to 600 lines or so
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Eeek! You do realise you've just sent the root password across your
network in plain text? Maybe your network is completely secure and
you aren't running a risk by doing that, but on the whole it's a
really bad idea. Get into the habit of using ssh(1) routinely for
Jay O'Brien wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Eeek! You do realise you've just sent the root password across your
network in plain text? Maybe your network is completely secure and
you aren't running a risk by doing that, but on the whole it's a
really bad idea. Get into the habit of using ssh(1)
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 11:47:06AM -0400, John Cholewa wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded the php4 port on this 4.8-RELEASE box to 4.3.8_2. I'm also
using apache+mod_ssl-1.3.31+2.8.19.
When the lines
LoadModule php4_modulelibexec/apache/libphp4.so
AddModule mod_php4.c
are uncommented,
Matthew,
Thanks for your concern. Once there is anything on the computer, I
will certainly close those security holes. Right now it is only a
means to learn about FreeBSD and document the steps necessary to build
a machine that will fit my needs. I opened ftp and telnet access to
root as
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 07:37:53AM +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
Is there some deeper reason why mod_php and php-cli conflict?
I have got mod_php5 and apache2 running and would like to enable
the php command line interface, too. How can I do this?
--- Tyler Parrott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, right after I sent that email I read about the
image already
being bootable. I supposed I should do my homework
before making my
posts:)
Anyways, the image is burnt correctly, so I'm back
to where I started
with no idea how to move
Hi!
I'm looking into if I should go with ipfw2 or ipfilter, anyone that could
point me to some links or tell me pro's and con's (both feature and
performance wise).
Kind Regards,
Stefan Cars
--
Stefan Cars
Snowfall Communications
http://www.snowfall.se
Tel: +46 (0)18 430 80 50 - Direct: +46
Hi,
I've seen this topic come up in the lists recently but I haven't seen a solution for
it. I'm trying to install 4.10 on a new 400SC. When I boot I see:
HBA ID LUN Vendor
0 0 0 Fugitsu 36422MB
0 7 0
Hi,
I've seen this topic come up in the lists recently but I haven't seen a
solution for it. I'm trying to install 4.10 on a new 400SC. When I boot I see:
HBA ID LUN Vendor
0 0 0 Fugitsu 36422MB
0 7 0
Thanks for all the advice, it is much appreciated. I'll give the
floppies a try.
That error that you pasted is pretty much exactly what I get, although
I'm not sure whether or not the register values are the same:)
Again, I'll try with the floppies:)
Thanks!
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:46:05 -0700
At 10:43 8/16/2004, Tyler Parrott, wrote:
Yeah, right after I sent that email I read about the image already
being bootable. I supposed I should do my homework before making my
posts:)
Anyways, the image is burnt correctly, so I'm back to where I started
with no idea how to move forward...
On
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:46:23PM +0200, Stefan Cars wrote:
I'm looking into if I should go with ipfw2 or ipfilter, anyone that could
point me to some links or tell me pro's and con's (both feature and
performance wise).
Unless your running quite a complicated setup or have specific
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 05:01:51PM +0200, Volker Kindermann wrote:
Hi James,
The following appeared in my latest daily security run output:
Checking for uids of 0:
root 0
toor 0
This is the first time I've seen this message.
I checked /etc/passwd and found
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:07:17 -0400 (EDT)
Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've seen this topic come up in the lists recently but I haven't seen a
solution for it. I'm trying to install 4.10 on a new 400SC. When I boot I see:
HBA ID LUN Vendor
0
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2004-08-16 09:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:09:30PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Mike wrote:
When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If
possible I'd like to set the scroll back to
!--
pancake manure refrain dr approbation gather wherewithal yeshiva candela comfort
cabana ignominious mcgovern dysplasia wreath charge behold averse clothesmen
gustafson ottoman precinct haberdashery purport snider affinity lacquer creepy
bouffant doze abridgment mercilessly annoyance
!--
I am running the latest port version of ProFTPd on one of my servers but it
seems to hang for as long as 60 seconds whenever I attempt to transfer data.
The cmd line says 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode and then hangs.
Eventually it does work, but it greatly impedes my coding efforts.
Supposedly, the Atheros 5212 chipset supports both 11.a/b/g, but for
some reason 'ifconfig -m' does not return any modes for the 11b network
(which I am currently trying to stay connected to).
bumbaldi# dmesg |grep ath0
ath0: Atheros 5212 mem 0xed80-0xed80 irq 16 at device 13.0 on
pci0
On Aug 16, 2004, at 12:34 PM, Jeanne wrote:
Jerry - thanks for the response. I did see your comments on the
situation you describe below, sorry that you had to say the same thing
twice. But I was/am confused, because I'm not using SATA. I am using
the LSILogic scsi controller card. Am I correct
In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of
crashes using either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the
newest version of each from Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9.
It typically happens when i visit a complicated
website with lots of dynamically-generated content,
like the N.Y.
Times or eBay. But its
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:51:19 -0500
David Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The mpt(4) driver in 5.2.1 (thats what I have, guessing its pretty much
the same for your 4.10) says it supports the 53c1030 Dual Ultra320
SCSI. Also says it first appeared in FreeBSD 4.6. I don't have this
SCSI
I was wondering what PCI modems FreeBSD supports. I have followed the
hardware link on the web site but could not find a supplier to the UK.
I was wondering if the ADSL PCI Conexant Chipset was supported.
I would be grateful for any information on this matter.
Gary Edwards
Hi all
Just a quick question, as it was posted on the list
nvidia has released some new drivers, i've yet to try
these drivers but at the moment im having to use
-CURRENT to be able to get the previous release
to work properly and they did very well. I rebuilt my
world/kernel with -CURRENT and
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote:
In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes using
either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the newest version of each from
Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9.
And on 5.2.1-RELEASE and 5.2-CURRENT
It typically happens when i visit a
--On Monday, August 16, 2004 21:37:13 +0930 Paul A. Hoadley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 02:22:02PM -0700, Pat Lashley wrote:
Just FYI, Exim, with the ExiScan patches, can reject at SMTP time;
and also has a 'fakereject' capability which tells the sender that
the message has
Hello,
Is there any way to make a shell script execute immediately after a firewire
device is plugged in? The man pages and mailing list archives didn't even get
me close to a hint of whether this is possible or not.
Failing that, is there a (good) way to tell from the command line whether a
As a follow-up, this happens even if I replace ProFTPd with the built-in ftpd
via inetd. How do I eliminate this delay?
Cheers!
--
Aaron Dalton
http://aaron.daltons.ca
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:24:00 +0200
Ruben de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 07:53:10PM -0700, Kevin Stevens typed:
A lot of network scanners also trigger on NICS in promiscuous mode
(there's a way to detect them, I forget the details at the moment)
because admins
I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and
yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the
outgoing bandwith.
Do you know of any such animals?
Reading the man pages for ftpd is like trying to read and understand
Klingon.
Thanks
DS
On Monday 16 August 2004 01:31 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote:
In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes using
either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the newest version of each from
Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9.
And on
On Monday 16 August 2004 02:30 pm, Joshua Tinnin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Monday 16 August 2004 01:31 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote:
In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes using
either Mozilla or Firefox.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:31:22PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote:
In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes using
either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the newest version of each from
Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9.
uname -a
FreeBSD test21.eng 4.7-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE #0: Fri Dec 6
13:38:10 PST 2002 root@:/usr/src/sys/compile/350-GODSPEED-4.7
i386
I've been trying to build a documentation package called synopsis (
http://synopsis.fresco.org/index.html ). It requires gcc 3.x.
I have gcc
On Monday 16 August 2004 04:38 pm, Dan Rue wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:31:22PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote:
In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes
using either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the
I'm running 4.10-STABLE.
Here's my uname output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED](p0)/usr/ports/graphics/gimp 115% uname -a
FreeBSD lightning.StevenFriedrich.org 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #49: Tue
Aug 10 23:10:38 EDT 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LIGHTNING i386
Here's the error:
Taken from the vsftpd website FAQ:
Q) Help! Does vsftpd support bandwidth limiting?
A) Yes. See vsftpd.conf.5 man page and investigate settings such as
anon_max_rate and local_max_rate.
(That is, install vsftpd and run man 5 vsftpd.conf. Alternately, read the
HTML version at
Quick question, is there an Application Level firewall available to FreeBSD.
I understand IPFilter is a stateful packet filter, but has it or any other
packages moved to the next level - Application Level Inspection?
Sorry I am all googled out on this one.
Thanks
Paul
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:11:14PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and
yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the
outgoing bandwith.
Do you know of any such animals?
dummynet(4) will probably do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and
yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the
outgoing bandwith.
Do you know of any such animals?
No. But look at the bandwidth shaping capabilities of IPFW. It _can_ do
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:11:14 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and
yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the
outgoing bandwith.
This is generally not an ftp daemon function. Bandwidth limiting may
be
Paul Hillen wrote:
Quick question, is there an Application Level firewall available to FreeBSD.
For some definitions of that buzzword, sure.
I understand IPFilter is a stateful packet filter, but has it or any other
packages moved to the next level - Application Level Inspection?
Squid plus a
Hello,
Sorry for the completely OT post, but I saw two mentions of PuTTY in
one day on the list and assume it must be a popular piece of Windows
software. The SANS Institute @Risk newsletter dated 8AUG04 contains
the following item regarding PuTTY:
04.31.4 CVE: Not Available
Platform: Third
Don't mean to steal your spot light but here's the errors I got this
morning when trying to build:
In file included from /usr/local/include/libwmf/types.h:26,
from /usr/local/include/libwmf/api.h:25,
from wmf.c:33:
I'm using the FreeBSD search at the bottom of the home page.
I searched for libc_r and I got pages that don't have that in them. Why? Is
the underscore a problem?
Also, is there anyway to limit hits to a particular language?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
stheg olloydson wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the completely OT post, but I saw two mentions of PuTTY in
one day on the list and assume it must be a popular piece of Windows
software. The SANS Institute @Risk newsletter dated 8AUG04 contains
the following item regarding PuTTY:
04.31.4 CVE: Not
On Monday 16 August 2004 03:52 pm, stheg olloydson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the completely OT post, but I saw two mentions of PuTTY in
one day on the list and assume it must be a popular piece of Windows
software.
It is written for *nix and win32, and it has an MIT license.
I will be attending college in a few weeks. The network at this uni requires
802.1x authentication over wireless connections. I've scoured google all
over and discovered Open1x--which has openly dropped all BSD support--and a
guy who has ported Open1x, but only on wired connections. I'm a decent
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:11:14 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and
yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the
outgoing bandwith.
Do you know of any such animals?
Yes, ProFTPD (ftp/proftpd in ports)
it was said:
I think what you are saying is that if you use PuTTY as a client
application that you should be concerned about what server you
connect to? From what you are saying, I suspect that if the only
use is to connect to your own (FreeBSD) server, you are probably ok?
Jay O'Brien
I'm trying to install FreeBSD for the first time but I am having an error
that I can't figure out. I have googled for an answer and read mailing list
posts but still can't find what I'm looking for. First, when the disk boots
and checks the hardware, it does something strange to my network
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote:
In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of
crashes using either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the
newest version of each from Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9.
Sorry for the me too post, but since people are reporting
different
What's the best way to erase an installation of FreeBSD
completely from a HD and start over? I'm installing 4.10
from am ISO CD, and it installs fine. However, I would
like to start over from scratch and it remembers some
of what was on the HD from the last install. If I were
in Windows/DOS I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Dalton
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 4:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ProFTPd: 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode
As a follow-up, this happens even if I replace ProFTPd with the built-in
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay O'Brien
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 8:21 PM
To: FreeBSD - questions
Subject: How to start clean install again?
What's the best way to erase an installation of FreeBSD
completely from a HD and start
Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best way to erase an installation of FreeBSD
completely from a HD and start over? I'm installing 4.10
from am ISO CD, and it installs fine. However, I would
like to start over from scratch and it remembers some
of what was on the HD from
On Thursday, 8 July 2004 at 2:21:30 -0500, Mario Doria wrote:
Hi,
Another vinum question. I have a machine running 5-CURRENT sources from
yesterday (yes I know the dangers of running CURRENT and I did read the
mailing list archives).
Well, the issue was discussed there.
I think I found
On August 16, 2004 07:24 pm, Andras Kende wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Dalton
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 4:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ProFTPd: 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode
Is there a firewall
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:33:56 -0700
Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:11:14PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com
and yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke
the outgoing
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
