On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
> See the output of 'mount(8)' for the names of all the mounted filesystems on
> your machine.
$ mount | grep proc
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
>
> *NOTE*WELL* that '/proc' is *not* a separate filesystem. It is merely a
> _directory_ with
I use Amanda to make nightly backups of a bunch of servers using GNU tar.
However, gtar doesn't seem to respect its --one-file-system flag with /proc.
Amanda runs a variation of this command:
# /usr/local/bin/gtar --create --file - --directory / --one-file-system
--sparse --ignore-failed-re
On 06/23/10 11:35, Polytropon wrote:
Of course, all write attempts to /var will then fail.
Or even worse: they'll succeeded. And then when you re-mount /var,
you'll lose access to all the files you've written in the mean time.
-
burners to the on board esata. YMMV
Good grief. Thanks for the information.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr
On 04/12/10 10:50, Mark wrote:
Would you need to load atapicam into the kernel??
That doesn't seem to change things. I'll try again later today by
rebooting with atapicam_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf just for giggles
0: FAILURE - MODE_SENSE timed out
ata3: SIGNATURE: eb140101
ast0: FAILURE - MODE_SENSE timed out
device_attach: ast0 attach returned 6
...and then device ast0 never appears. Any idea how I can get these two
pieces of hardware to play nicely together?
--
Kir
On 02/04/2010 10:26 AM, Kirk Strauser wrote:
Any idea why that may be or how I could troubleshoot it, short of
bisecting the sudo releases until I find the culprit?
Eh, did it anyway. The problem was with a change added between 1.7.2p1
and 1.7.2p2. This patch fixes it:
--- auth/pam.c.orig
sudo -v
otp-md5 [something]
Password:
$
Any idea why that may be or how I could troubleshoot it, short of
bisecting the sudo releases until I find the culprit?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
though, do you see jails as particularly important or useful when not in
a hosting environment where you're giving root access to an untrusted
party? How far do you go toward segregating services? Theoretically, you
could have a jail per daemon, but it seems like down that path lies madness.
-
akefile, I can't even start downloading the distfiles (using "make
fetch") until I pkg_delete the old version. With the old system, I could
do everything up through building the new port so that the time between
running pkg_delete and "make reinstall&qu
t a minute; rewind. Isn't that what "make -DDISABLE_CONFLICTS" does?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &q
ledge.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
sh building. That's not very helpful
for those ports that don't actually build until you run "make install",
but at least I can get the distfile download out of the way.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin
27;t have those fixes.
All that said, is there a better way to specify SourceForge mirrors? A
blacklist would be ideal for this specific situation, but I'm open to ideas.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Aug 11, 2009, at 9:53 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
Have you also built perl-threaded?
I just now recompiled Perl with threads enabled, then Imagemagick,
with identical results.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Aug 11, 2009, at 6:54 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:18:43AM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On my FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE system (from July 29), I'm trying to enable
OpenMP for the graphics/ImageMagick port. With the
IMAGEMAGICK_OPENMP
option set, I get this from
td=gnu99 option to support OpenMP... -fopenmp
If I go on to build it, there's no other mention of OpenMP in the
output. What am I doing wrong?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 03:10:46 am Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Or store your data in a RDBMS rather than in the filesystem.
Hear, hear. I'm hard pressed to imagine why you'd need 100M 1KB files.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebs
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
my 6 disk system with 2 750GB disks, 2 500GB disks and 2 320GB disks
does fsck in 40 minutes. if you exclude these 320GB disk containing
system and squid cache (LOTS of files) it takes <5 minutes
That's a great example of why I like ZFS on new installations.
fsck, great RAID
support, and nearly instant snapshots. You should check into it.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd
don't have to remember
what some single-letter option meant. I pretty much never use them on
the command line, though.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio
6.22. Anyone remember that?
Ouch. You had to go there, didn't you?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Thursday 04 June 2009 11:53:38 am Kirk Strauser wrote:
> For some reason, BIND 9 (FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE) isn't properly forwarding
> queries.
Commenting out
// zone "10.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "master/empty.db"; };
from named.conf fix
, and jump around hyperlinks all over.
In fairness, a good info browser (eg Emacs) makes searching in an info doc
trivially easy. I think the biggest problem is that /usr/bin/info is horrid
and people lump their impression of it onto their impression of info docs as a
whole.
0.in-addr.arpa.IN PTR
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
10.in-addr.arpa.10800 IN SOA 10.in-addr.arpa.
nobody.localhost. 42 86400 43200 604800 10800
So, why isn't named directing that query to the configured forwarder? I'm
99.9% certa
On Thursday 04 June 2009 11:20:24 am Chris Rees wrote:
> PS Does _anyone_ prefer info manuals, apart from Stallman?
I like them *in their place*. Can you imagine how long the man page for GCC
would be? IMHO, though, info pages are only tolerable within Emacs.
--
Kirk Strau
FreeBSD's,
but I really had to go looking for that interpretation.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Ignore him please.
Sent from my iPod
--
Kirk
On Jun 3, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Wojciech Puchar > wrote:
PS. I love FreeBSD for its excellent documentation. Can't tell
something similar about Linux, sadly.
---
This manual is no longer maintained. It may contain wrong
informations. Use te
te", too. :-)
Well, I see the point of documenting it in one canonical location, and
pointing everything else at that location (instead of having to maintain every
related man page every time it's updated).
--
Kirk Strauser
___
f
he year with four digits, such
> as 2009-01-01 would be 09/001, 2009-02-01 would be 2009/032.
Like this?
$ date +'%y/%j'
09/154
$ date +'%Y/%j'
2009/154
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
eeBSD slices or partitions.
> If your system needs swapping under normal operation, using ZFS is really
> bad idea as it needs lots of memory - which you are already short of.
It was more of the "just in case", with plenty of RAM for normal operation.
--
Kirk Strauser
_
Putting swap on ZFS is listed as broken on the wiki. Is that still true of
the newly MFC'ed version?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, sen
else, scanning for
> other programs i have on disk, my addressbook etc.
I agree completely. I'd never voluntarily trust my personal information to a
system that I (or other interested parties on my behalf) couldn't audit.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
fr
y is flat-out stupid, and I'd fire you in a second
if you brought that level of bullheaded incompetence into my company.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-que
On Thursday 28 May 2009 06:13:11 am Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> rsh is as secure as the communication channel. If it can be considered
> secure - DO USE rsh, because it's fastest as it doesn't have any
> encryption overhead.
Are you on a 386
eed to
optimize for CPU in such cases when the security payoffs are so great.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 11:44:03 am Glen Barber wrote:
> Thanks to your attitude, actions, and demeanor, I will be
> unsubscribing from this list.
Don't. He's hardly the only PITA in support mailing lists. Just add him to
your killfile and move on.
-
d there are a whole boatload of subtle incompatibilities when
handling stuff at that level.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr
would be non-trivial to port to 32-bit,
particularly if performance is an issue.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
e operations with 2 32-bit values, and on the
register-starved x86 platform you end up with absolutely horrible performance.
Furthermore, it's just not that well tested. Sun designed ZFS for 64-bit
systems and I think 32-bit support was pretty much an afterthought.
--
Kirk Strauser
_
everything for safety's sake.
- Snapshots aren't painful.
It's been 100% reliable on every amd64 machine I've put it on (but avoid it on
x86!). 7-STABLE hasn't required any tuning since February or so.
UFS and gstripe/gmirror/graid* a
On Friday 22 May 2009 01:05:57 pm Warren Block wrote:
> Seems like it'd be less work to have the FreeBSD system close the
> switches of a real USB joystick.
Think so? I had an Arduino writing messages to my kids on a 7-segment display
in about an hour. I would think that finding the right USB c
On Friday 22 May 2009 11:07:34 am Sebastiaan van Erk wrote:
> Ok, that's a clear answer. Are there any alternatives? For example a PCI
> expansion card that does USB device mode and is programmable? Might be
> difficult to get working under FreeBSD though maybe?
You might look at getting an Ardui
On May 20, 2009, at 7:00 AM, Mel Flynn wrote:
Check with top what the CPU time is, it's not the same as the wall
clock.
Give me *some* credit. :-)
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
ht be doing wrong and causing it not to do so?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
t;sendmail wide open" (eg sendmail_enable="NO"
(WTF?)) and "disabled mail
system" (eg sendmail_enable="NONE")?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:45 PM, Mel wrote:
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 11:24:50 Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 10:32:57 Mel wrote:
Even though 7.1 has bugfixes, this kind of guesswork causes a lot of
downtime for OP without any certainty that things will be any
better.
If
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 10:32:57 Mel wrote:
> Even though 7.1 has bugfixes, this kind of guesswork causes a lot of
> downtime for OP without any certainty that things will be any better.
If by "lots" you mean "2 minutes for a reboot", I'd be incli
On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:04 PM, FreeBSD wrote:
This server is very lightly used, so most of the time if the swap is
getting used it shows that something is going wrong.
No it doesn't. Get that wrong idea out of your head.
--
Kirk Str
any day soon.
I'd still like to know if the error count increased, or if it started
to detect imminent failure.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To uns
x27;m fine with that. I just don't want to hear
about them any more. :-)
--
Kirk Strauser
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
al.
Seriously, get over your obsession with keeping swap utterly empty
before it drives you nuts. FreeBSD isn't designed to work that way
and you'll be fighting it for no good reason whatsoever.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd
y answering it in
smartctl(8) but wondered if I missed something.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
;
chances are it's already done what you want.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
to figure out what's spamming /tmp. You *can* do
something like "find /tmp -type f -oldermt '3 days ago' -delete", but that's
just addressing the symptoms.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
gt; some free?
Do you *know* that it hadn't copied it back to RAM, leaving a copy in swap in
case it needs that RAM suddenly? Really, the OS is better at this than we
are.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
used.
> How can I "reset" the swap?
You don't. The system will handle it for you, I promise. :-)
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsub
On Monday 01 December 2008 13:24:48 Valentin Bud wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It has a lot of really cool other features that I will probably never
> > need.
> then you don't need ZFS. usually you choose a tec
On Monday 01 December 2008 11:49:46 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> UFS is excellent. your problem is that you like to have "lots of
> filesystems". why don't just make one or one per disk?
For all the usual reasons: faster fsck, ability to set attributes on each
filesystem (noexec, noatime, ro), a run
I have ZFS on my 7.1-PRERELEASE system, and while it does some spiffy things,
in general I'm a bit underwhelmed.
PROS:
Adding new filesystems on a whim is really nice.
It has a lot of really cool other features that I will probably never need.
CONS:
I have nearly 3GB of wired RAM, but i
ations for cheap, minimal
cards that are known to work well with recent FreeBSD releases?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Oct 28, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
The following excerpt from /usr/ports/UPDATING will completely
answer your question :)
Sigh. And I get onto other people for not reading that. :-D
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions
to wonder, though:
what browsers *do* look in /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins? Or is that
just meant to be a convenient place to symlink into?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
lected, and /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins/libgnashplugin.so is
there, but "about:plugins" doesn't reflect it.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
nd to persuade him to change
course if I think he's making a bad decision. I'm not paid to do data entry,
but to know enough about my job to know what's best for my employer.
The final decision is his, but until he's made it, I'll
On Saturday 11 October 2008 03:10:41 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> well it's KDE. what do you expect ;)
QT4 is quite a lot faster than QT3, and both have been very quick for several
years now. Your argument is quite turn-of-the-millenium.
--
Kirk
ame screen) and
try changing the "Compositing type" between OpenGL and XRender.
I'm also using the "radeon" driver and it's nicely fast on my machine.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
ldworld" and it got up to 58C.
Since killing that build, it's slowly working its way back into the
high 40s (currently bouncing between 48 and 49).
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
x27; in /etc/rc.conf and
started it.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
why coretemp and the BIOS would show such different numbers?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I guess I'll go back to using it
and letting it manage itself. :-)
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Thursday 02 October 2008, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I have an AMD system with 6GB of RAM. From dmesg:
>
> usable memory = 6428237824 (6130 MB)
> avail memory = 6203797504 (5916 MB)
>
> However, most of it is just sitting there when it looks like it could be
> used
Buf, 138M Free
Swap: 8192M Total, 900K Used, 8191M Free
Since I've yet to find a great explanation for what the different types of
memory are, could someone say why all that inactive memory is better than
using it for cache or buffers?
--
Kirk Str
ted file system" is intact
and that your dump is uncorrupted?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Aug 27, 2008, at 10:22 AM, Kirk Strauser wrote:
Occasionally, whenever I open sa0 for reading (typically when Amanda
starts
flushing backups to tape), the system resets.
In summary: RAM issues. Apparently I have to boost the RAM from 1.8V
to 2.1V, or so says its manufacturer. Got my
(which the adapter had enabled by default), and moved it to a different power
lead. So far so good, but 24 hours does not my confidence earn. Thanks for
the tips! If it's still acting wonky, I'll work through them.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
fre
On Thursday 28 August 2008 07:59:00 H.fazaeli wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have 3 questions regrading SMP on freebsd 6.x:
>
> 1. Is there any userland tool/api to bound a process to a specific cpu?
I don't think so. FreeBSD 7.x just got "cpuset" backported from
th an intermittent short or something.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
card for a duplicate I had stored away.
Is it possible that the drive itself is triggering the reset? I'd find that a
little unlikely, but am certainly not an expert on the matter. Alternatively,
has anyone had that sort of problem with drives attached
t work? I'd just as soon use one of the on-board SATA
connectors as an aging boat anchor of a SCSI card if I could get away
with it. I mean, I still use SCSI a lot elsewhere, but I'd like to
ditch it in this one specific application if possib
#x27;t portable from
32-bit to 64-bit systems, and I used quite a few. A word to the wise: dump
PostgreSQL to a text file before the upgrade.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
s ago, so it should be fairly
clean of any weird legacy settings. Has anyone else successfully installed
KDE4 on FreeBSD 7?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-que
that script as root. If they hit
^C, they get dropped right back to their own account.
> I want this because there is intelectual propierty behind this.
Don't put trade secrets in shell scripts.
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
patch FreeBSD-specific problems with a lot
of software?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
}/VirtualHostBase/http/web2.xrsnet.com:80/XRSnet/VirtualHostRoot/$1
[P]
On each new connection, Apache picks a random port from the list defined in
zope.txt and passes the connection to that Zope process.
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ch
traffic I'd been getting, and found none.
So back to my original post: take this as a heads-up. Anyone who had a
setup like mine that suddenly stopped working might be able to fix it by
updating their defaultrouter.
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
gt;
> % ping6 fe80::213:10ff:fe79:137a
$ ping6 fe80::213:10ff:fe79:137a
ping6: UDP connect: Network is unreachable
This is after rebooting with ipv6_defaultrouter="2001:470:a80a:1::1".
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
x27;s IPv6 address and was very
keen in getting it up and running.
I think above solution is better.
Perhaps. I'm content with anything that keeps my connectivity up
between reboots.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing l
this many months
ago, which is why I was using link local routing in the first place).
So, I'm not too sure which is right or wrong, but I definitely know
that something has changed recently. Consider this a heads-up if you
want.
--
Kirk Strauser
tle while ago,
and it was an *excellent* introduction. I used it to configure Asterisk on
my FreeBSD server.
link: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596009625/
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 12 June 2008, you wrote:
> If there is a tuning knob that I have missed, would appreciate being
> told what.
Dang it; hit "send" on accident.
Anyway, should the partition offsets on your gstripe volume be a multiple of
the stripe size or of the filesystem's
that we'd coincidentally have
almost the exact same values.
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
reads fetch an entire stripe while large reads are broken into lots
of tiny ones.
So, back to gstripe. Which of those is it most like?
> If there is a tuning knob that I have missed, would appreciate being
> told what.
Pass it along, would ya? :-)
Oh, and don't forget to make your par
Be sure to check in /usr/src/UPDATING to see if there are any special
gotchas.
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Does gstripe read an entire stripe at a time? If so, why do that instead of
just reading a few requested blocks? If not, then is there any advantage
to large stripes?
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ound like a good idea. I changed almost all
the
mallocs into static buffers.
I'm still offering that shell account to anyone who wants to take a peek. :-)
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> On Linux:
>
> $ time ./cdbf /tmp/invoice.dbf >/dev/null
> ./cdbf /tmp/invoice.dbf > /dev/null 42.65s user 20.09s system 71% cpu
> 1:28.15 total
>
> On FreeBSD:
Oops! I left that out:
$ time /tmp/cdbf /var/tmp/invoi
On Thursday 05 June 2008, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I was testing the same software on my desktop PC when I noticed that it
> ran *much* faster, and found that it was spending only about 1% as much
> time in the kernel on Linux as it was on FreeBSD.
I'm almost ready to give up on th
elieve the same code is *so* much faster on Linux. I'd also swear that
this is a regression and that it used to run much faster on the same
FreeBSD machine back when it was running 6.x, but I never bothered to
benchmark it then because it
eeBSD. Speaking of which, I think my next experiment will be to try
the Linux binaries on FreeBSD and see if it behaves similarly.
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-quest
1 - 100 of 635 matches
Mail list logo
