Hi all,
Not sure if this is the right spot to ask, but it seems to be
particularly pertaining to FreeBSD installations. So here I am.
I'm trying to install qmail-tls. The installation is successful - almost
right out of the ports. Now I'm trying configure qmail such that only
T
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it to.
For more information on our business please click on the following link:
Click here for our website
We look forward to your continued business in the future.
Regards,
Webmaster
___
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Jarrod Slick wrote:
> Dear Sir/Madam,
>
> Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it to.
> For more information on our business please click on the following link:
> Click here for our website
> We look forward to your continued busines
>When you do decide on your MTA, I'd recommend buying a book which
>documents it.
Oh, definitely. Particularly if you decide on qmail.
R's,
John
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
On 02-02-2011 16:37, Frank Shute wrote:
What I'd also say is that Postfix is probably easier to install and
configure.
Agreed. Postfix is *really* easy and well documented; so much that I've
seen people claim that it "can't be that good" since it's so easy to
configure, with great defaults an
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>
> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
>
> thanks in advance
I've used both and both have their advocates/supporters.
I used qmail for about 10 yrs and picked it when basically the choice
was qmail, sendma
On 2/1/2011 at 8:44 PM Paul Macdonald wrote:
|On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
|>
|> No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix,
and
|> pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
|>
|> But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something I want
it
stions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Nowadays I think Postfix is much more complete and efficient mail
system than Qmail although this one it's a pretty small and good code by
design mail system... but the problem is that you'll probably need more
features than qmail-1.03 gave unless..
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote:
> On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>
>> No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and
>> pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
>>
>> But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something
> "Jarrod" == Jarrod Slick writes:
Jarrod> If you know of any specific problems with postfix that would
Jarrod> substantiate your claim I encourage you to inform the project's
Jarrod> maintainers.
In fact, given the legacy of other security tools created by the author
of Postfix (Wietse Vene
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Jarrod Slick wrote:
> Calling qmail more secure is pretty much just echoing conjecture at this
> point. Sure, it was designed to be secure (years and years ago) and the
> original author even held a contest with a monetary reward for anyone who
>
Calling qmail more secure is pretty much just echoing conjecture at this
point. Sure, it was designed to be secure (years and years ago) and the
original author even held a contest with a monetary reward for anyone who
could find a vulnerability -- that said, AFAIK that person no longer
maintains
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
qmail is more secure... but the design is just as alien to unix as sendmail is
for example, the fact that qmail uses custom libc, or at least did so on the
version i tried. that turns
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:44:24PM +, Paul Macdonald wrote:
> On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> >
> >No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and
> >pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
> >
> >But I've never found postfix without a knob to do
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:44:24 +
Paul Macdonald articulated:
> so for us folks still using sendmail (which works fine for me)
> what benefits do we get with postfix that'd outweigh the hassles of
> changing?
Without knowing your exact configuration and requirements, answering
that question is
On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and
pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something I want it to
do, and most of the knobs are set properly right out of
> "Outback" == Outback Dingo writes:
>> |"Postfix" is actively maintained and is constantly being upgraded by
>> |its author. Its mail forum is robust and Postfix has outstanding
>> |documentation; perhaps the best of any software available in the FOSS
>> |world.
>> =
>>
>>
>> I
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Mike. wrote:
> On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote:
>
> |On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
> |Alessandro Baggi articulated:
> |
> |> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
> |
> |"qmail" is not actively supported by i
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Mike. wrote:
> On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote:
>
> |On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
> |Alessandro Baggi articulated:
> |
> |> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
> |
> |"qmail" is not actively supported by i
On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote:
|On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
|Alessandro Baggi articulated:
|
|> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
|
|"qmail" is not actively supported by its developer. It requires
|numerous patches, etc to bring it up to acceptable servica
I like qmail, but I would, having written a book about it.
If you want something that works reasonably well out of the
box, I'd use Postfix. If you want something you can tweak to
do whatever you want, qmail is more of a toolkit.
Don't use the version of qmail in ports, it includes wa
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
Alessandro Baggi articulated:
> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
"qmail" is not actively supported by its developer. It requires
numerous patches, etc to bring it up to acceptable servicable standards.
"Postfix" is act
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 09:32, Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
>
> thanks in advance
That's a loaded question. Both have advocates, just like "vi or
emacs", "Linux or Nothing", "FreeBSD or OpenBSD", "OS X or
Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
thanks in advance
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I installed Qmail according to this tutorial
http://www.unixmexico.org/files/html/qmail-how-to/qmail-how-to.html . It was
succesful. Now I would like to install the rest of the related application
like vqadmin, vpopmail, courier IMAP etc. Please give me a link to some good
'how to' o
t/src/sys/i386/compile/ISPSYSTEM
>> > i386
>> >
>> > it is a vps running via a jail. I have installed mail/qmail and
>> > added it to rc.conf. It starts just fine but no remote mail ever
>> > gets delivered/received. DNS wise the machine is pointed to
t; i386
> >
> > it is a vps running via a jail. I have installed mail/qmail and
> > added it to rc.conf. It starts just fine but no remote mail ever
> > gets delivered/received. DNS wise the machine is pointed to a A
> > record for it's domain but the provi
> I have the following config:
>
> FreeBSD ppert-zone.com 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Wed Apr 14
> 01:44:13 UTC 2010
> r...@canopus.ispsystem.net:/root/src/sys/i386/compile/ISPSYSTEM i386
>
> it is a vps running via a jail. I have installed mail/qmail and added
I have the following config:
FreeBSD ppert-zone.com 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Wed Apr 14
01:44:13 UTC 2010
r...@canopus.ispsystem.net:/root/src/sys/i386/compile/ISPSYSTEM i386
it is a vps running via a jail. I have installed mail/qmail and added
it to rc.conf. It starts just fine
Sollunga S([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2008.11.11 04:32:08 -0800:
> Hi all
>
> Greetings to all, this is my first time installation of freebsd, i am going
> to use this installation for my mail server obviously qmail+ldap. I have a
> bit of fear to go ahead on it, can anyone
Hi all
Greetings to all, this is my first time installation of freebsd, i am going to
use this installation for my mail server obviously qmail+ldap. I have a bit of
fear to go ahead on it, can anyone clarify please?
Previous Qmail installation is on debian 3.x and the installation is based on
Of course, i need to know which patch is build in to qmail now.
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 14:02 +0330, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I installed freebsd 7.0 & install qmail from /usr/ports/mail/qmail &
> instal courier & vpopmail.
> Now i wanna use spp &
Dear all,
I installed freebsd 7.0 & install qmail from /usr/ports/mail/qmail &
instal courier & vpopmail.
Now i wanna use spp & i don't know to how to patch it.
Please help me.
Yours,
Mohsen
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.
Hello,
After installing qmail, and being quit happy with it, I wanted to start
using authentication;
which I can't get to work.
Installed mail/qmail-tls
in tcp.smtp:
192.168.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
:allow
For checkpassword I am using /usr/local/bin/checkpassword
which works
I've run into a bit of a problem and if I don't solve it soon, I'm going
to be without e-mail (and so will a lot of other people). This is a bit
long, I'm trying to include anything that may help.
The problem is that qmail-smtpd and/or rblsmtpd get stuck and don't
I've run into a bit of a problem and if I don't solve it soon, I'm going to
be without e-mail (and so will a lot of other people). This is a bit long,
I'm trying to include anything that may help.
The problem is that qmail-smtpd and/or rblsmtpd get stuck and don't
Jeff Dickens wrote:
> I used the patches and documents from qmail.jms1.net and built my own
> qmail, and it works well. I think a port that tracks qmail + jms1's
> current combined patch set would be well received.
>
For what is worth the mail/qmail-tls port says it supports
I used the patches and documents from qmail.jms1.net and built my own
qmail, and it works well. I think a port that tracks qmail + jms1's
current combined patch set would be well received.
BTW, I copied the maintainer of the qmail port on my earlier message,
and it eventually bo
Is there a document on how to set up SMTP auth using the FreeBSD qmail
port?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hello There!
I want to add greylisting support to my qmail server. I
tried to google about it and tried different methods but didn't get
succeeded. I have installed qmail via http://qmailrocks.org help. Hope
anyone can help me out.
Thanks in advance.
--
B.RGDS
Muhammad
> Paul A. Procacci wrote:
> > Victor Farah wrote:
> >> Hello
> >> I'm running qmail and I created an smtproutes file, inside my
> >> /var/qmail/control/ directory. I then sent a killall -ALRM
> >> qmail-send, but it doesn't seem like it
Paul A. Procacci wrote:
Victor Farah wrote:
Hello
I'm running qmail and I created an smtproutes file, inside my
/var/qmail/control/ directory. I then sent a killall -ALRM
qmail-send, but it doesn't seem like it uses that smtproutes file I
made. I start qmail using supervi
Victor Farah wrote:
Hello
I'm running qmail and I created an smtproutes file, inside my
/var/qmail/control/ directory. I then sent a killall -ALRM
qmail-send, but it doesn't seem like it uses that smtproutes file I
made. I start qmail using supervise scripts.
Also in my
Hello
I'm running qmail and I created an smtproutes file, inside my
/var/qmail/control/ directory. I then sent a killall -ALRM qmail-send,
but it doesn't seem like it uses that smtproutes file I made. I start
qmail using supervise scripts.
Also in my smtproutes file can I use IP
I'm trying to setup qmail with squirrelmail thus wu-imap on Freebsd
6.2 . imap is not authenticating the user and I dont know why.
Try:
telnet 216.236.255.45 143
a1 login test 0
and see what I'm talking about.
--
---
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:37:53AM -0400, Bob Johnson wrote:
> On 9/21/07, Lotfi kecir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hello. i'm newbbie in Unix especially in in FreeBSD. Recently i have setup
> > one mail server with postfix-dovecot and i would like to migrate it to Qmai
On 9/21/07, Lotfi kecir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello. i'm newbbie in Unix especially in in FreeBSD. Recently i have setup
> one mail server with postfix-dovecot and i would like to migrate it to Qmail
> server. but i didn't know how to do it. Someone can give help
Am Montag 24 September 2007 15:24:09 schrieb David Benfell:
> And not that this is the first file system issue I've heard about with
> qmail, but what is an MTA doing that should be file system dependent in any
> way? I *am* a happy qmail user, but this is something I just don
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:03:53 +0200, Christian Baer wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:36:24 -0400 DAve wrote:
>
> No, I don't want to start a fight here. I admit, that I don't like qmail
> and I *have* used it for years. I never hat security problems with it
> either and w
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:36:24 -0400 DAve wrote:
> First item, ignore the qmail haters. We run qmail quite successfully and
> find it very powerful, very secure, and well designed. I will not go
> into a point by point debate.
Goo idea! Lets also ignore all Windows haters. I'm su
DAve wrote:
Lotfi kecir wrote:
HI, thank's for your post.
to give answer to your answer: i rent a dedicated server (Fedora 6)
witch
has qmail installed on. and in my old Server witch is in our office
turn has
Postfix.
The new sever has as Admin panel Plesk.
I already create all
Lotfi kecir wrote:
HI, thank's for your post.
to give answer to your answer: i rent a dedicated server (Fedora 6) witch
has qmail installed on. and in my old Server witch is in our office turn has
Postfix.
The new sever has as Admin panel Plesk.
I already create all email acounts and no
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 08:31:34 -0500 Eric wrote:
>> Don't tell me, tell Dan Berstein (happy hunting):
>> http://cr.yp.to/qmail/guarantee.html
>> Observe point 5.
> DJB has not honored at least one vulnerability in qmail. read the link i
> posted early in this t
Christian Baer wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:18:53 +0200 Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote:
The qmail-configuration can be read an evaluated *without* a parser.
Excuse my spelling in the last message! :-) I corrected it in this quote.
Sorry, but that's BS (IMHO).
Don't tell me
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said Obscurity in the face
of adversity is no dice and while we were trying to figure that
out on Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 20:47 he continued with:
> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:46:02 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Christian Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: migrate from p
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:18:53 +0200 Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote:
>> The qmail-configuration can be read an evaluated *without* a parser.
Excuse my spelling in the last message! :-) I corrected it in this quote.
> Sorry, but that's BS (IMHO).
Don't tell me, tell Dan Bers
On 2007-09-22 02:47, Lotfi kecir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello. i'm newbbie in Unix especially in in FreeBSD. Recently i have
> setup one mail server with postfix-dovecot and i would like to migrate
> it to Qmail server. but i didn't know how to do it. Someone ca
Am Samstag 22 September 2007 15:48:55 schrieb Christian Baer:
>
> The qmail-configuration can be read an evaluated *without* a parcer.
Sorry, but that's BS (IMHO). Any program interpreting some form of input is
called a parser, and the only distinction is the algorithm you need, i.
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:13:58 +0100 Gabriel Dragffy wrote:
> Yeah right. I don't have hands-on experience with any MTA other than
> Postfix, but I never read a good thing about qmail. Thing is, I work
> for a design company - we have 3 VPSs two using Plesk and another on
>
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:47:06 +0200 Johan Andersson wrote:
> The best MTA is? exim?
Not that this is really a subject for this list, I don't really agree.
We did some studies on several MTAs a while back and found out (quite by
accident) that Exim has some real performance issues. I personally do
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:29:30 +0200 Lotfi kecir wrote:
> to give answer to your answer: i rent a dedicated server (Fedora 6) witch
> has qmail installed on. and in my old Server witch is in our office turn has
> Postfix.
> The new sever has as Admin panel Plesk.
> I already c
"Lotfi kecir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> HI, thank's for your post.
> to give answer to your answer: i rent a dedicated server (Fedora 6) witch
> has qmail installed on. and in my old Server witch is in our office turn has
> Postfix.
> The new sever has as A
My experience with Qmail is totally the opposite. It's a great MTA as you
can set it up and then forget about it for the next 100 years. Setup isn't
really a pain anymore with sites like lifewithqmail and qmailrocks. I've
been using Qmail for years and am a very happy mail admin;
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:47:09 +0200 Lotfi kecir wrote:
> hello. i'm newbbie in Unix especially in in FreeBSD. Recently i have setup
> one mail server with postfix-dovecot and i would like to migrate it to Qmail
> server. but i didn't know how to do it. Someone can give help m
> > > On 09/22/2007 11:30 AM, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 02:47 +0200, Lotfi kecir wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> hello. i'm newbbie in Unix especially in in FreeBSD. Recently i have
> > > > >> set
07-09-22 at 02:47 +0200, Lotfi kecir wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> hello. i'm newbbie in Unix especially in in FreeBSD. Recently i have
> > > >> setup
> > > >> one mail server with postfix-dovecot and i would like to migrate it to
&
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:13:58 +0100, Gabriel Dragffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On 22 Sep 2007, at 05:29, Lotfi kecir wrote:
>
>> HI, thank's for your post.
>> to give answer to your answer: i rent a dedicated server (Fedora 6)
>> witch
>> has qm
On 22 Sep 2007, at 05:29, Lotfi kecir wrote:
HI, thank's for your post.
to give answer to your answer: i rent a dedicated server (Fedora 6)
witch
has qmail installed on. and in my old Server witch is in our office
turn has
Postfix.
The new sever has as Admin panel Plesk.
I already c
i'm newbbie in Unix especially in in FreeBSD. Recently i have
> > >> setup
> > >> one mail server with postfix-dovecot and i would like to migrate it to
> > >> Qmail
> > >> server. but i didn't know how to do it. Someone can give help me?
&g
e mail server with postfix-dovecot and i would like to migrate it to
> >> Qmail
> >> server. but i didn't know how to do it. Someone can give help me?
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> > Qmail sucks for IPv6.
> > Qmail sucks for RFC 2821, as well.
> &
On 09/22/2007 11:30 AM, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 02:47 +0200, Lotfi kecir wrote:
>
>> hello. i'm newbbie in Unix especially in in FreeBSD. Recently i have setup
>> one mail server with postfix-dovecot and i would like to migrate it to Qmail
>>
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 02:47 +0200, Lotfi kecir wrote:
> hello. i'm newbbie in Unix especially in in FreeBSD. Recently i have setup
> one mail server with postfix-dovecot and i would like to migrate it to Qmail
> server. but i didn't know how to do it. Someone can give help
HI, thank's for your post.
to give answer to your answer: i rent a dedicated server (Fedora 6) witch
has qmail installed on. and in my old Server witch is in our office turn has
Postfix.
The new sever has as Admin panel Plesk.
I already create all email acounts and now i'm looking to tra
Hi,
I would agree with the below. I've got a fair amount of experience and i
tried on a test box to get qmail working, i did, but it was weird, it didn't
conform to FreeBSD's filesystem layout, files were in unusual places,
daemons started up nonstandard, and it felt like
Lotfi kecir wrote:
hello. i'm newbbie in Unix especially in in FreeBSD. Recently i have setup
one mail server with postfix-dovecot and i would like to migrate it to Qmail
server. but i didn't know how to do it. Someone can give help
hello. i'm newbbie in Unix especially in in FreeBSD. Recently i have setup
one mail server with postfix-dovecot and i would like to migrate it to Qmail
server. but i didn't know how to do it. Someone can give help me?
Thanks.
___
freebsd
The qmail is delivering to the mailboxes. I want to use /var/spool/mail, I
know i have to use procmail but how do i set it up?
---
Bill Banks 508-829-2005
Wachusett Programming Ourweb
http://www.ourweb.net
http
On 2007-09-13 22:48, Bill Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just make qmail from port and killed sendmail. I can send mail out but
> can't recvice it. I think that the mailboxes is not made,,
You'll have to provide us with *many* more details about the precise
steps
I just make qmail from port and killed sendmail. I can send mail out but
can't recvice it. I think that the mailboxes is not made,,
---
Bill Banks 508-829-2005
Wachusett Programming Ourweb
http://www.ourweb.net
should not hinder arriving or providing solutions to configuring qmail
aliases and virtualdomains.
The problem is almost certainly that you have a typo in a control file
somewhere. Since you are unwilling to show us the actual contents of
those control files, it is unlikely that we can help you
I thought my explanation was fairly clear. Also domain.com is a sample
domain name and really has nothing to do with the issue at hand. Sample
domain names are used all the time In examples and should not hinder arriving
or providing solutions to configuring qmail aliases and virtualdomains
are used all the time In examples and should not hinder
> arriving or providing solutions to configuring qmail aliases and
> virtualdomains.
>
But particularly in anything that has anything to do with domains, one
approach is to test configurations externally for problems that may n
>Since I am not getting a response from the qmail list - well there are a
>bunch of knowledgeable members here. So...
We saw your question on the qmail list, but we couldn't answer it because
you're not telling us what you're really doing. (Unless you are the
registrant
solutions to configuring qmail aliases and
virtualdomains.
cheers,
noah
John Levine wrote:
Since I am not getting a response from the qmail list - well there are a
bunch of knowledgeable members here. So...
We saw your question on the qmail list, but we couldn't answer it because
you&#
Since I am not getting a response from the qmail list - well there are a
bunch of knowledgeable members here. So...
okay i collect mail for two domains with overlapping aliases. the
acutal host name of the server is globs.domain.com
so there is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Problem solved: bad network card.
On 2/4/07, Cristian Mijea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not really a freebsd question, sorry.
I have a mail server on a freebsd machine. Qmail+SpamAssasin+Clamav.
At a first look, everything works just fine, but any lage atachement
gets corrupted.
Smalle
Not really a freebsd question, sorry.
I have a mail server on a freebsd machine. Qmail+SpamAssasin+Clamav.
At a first look, everything works just fine, but any lage atachement
gets corrupted.
Smaller mail is just fine.
Removed the extras (qmail-scanner, clamav, spamassasin) and still the same
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:06:48 -0800 (PST)
Rachel Florentine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if you can please provide the command to build ezmlm-idx.
it's in the ports : /usr/ports/mail/ezmlm-idx
just install it as any other port
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"The greate
757575Hi;
I installed qmail from source because of problems with the port. I installed
vpopmail from port okay. I installed ezmlm-idx from port; however, it doesn't
appear to communicate with one or both of the other two programs. I can issue
commands from the command prompt to create a
7676Thanks everyone for your help. It's been a long weekend with lots of
mistakes, but I'm up now.
Rachel
Sponsored Link
Mortgage rates near 39yr lows.
$420k for $1,399/mo. Calculate new payment!
www.Lowe
On Saturday 18 November 2006 20:54, Rachel Florentine wrote:
> 7883- Original Message
> From: Tom Ierna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I've installed qmail/vpopmail many ways - from source, using the
> > instructions from qmailrocks and most recently using
On Nov 18, 2006, at 9:54 PM, Rachel Florentine wrote:
make test resulted in this:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
--
-
t/Toaster.t1 256411 2.44% 22
t/toaster-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Florentine
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 1:19 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Qmail & Vpopmail From Ports
Hi;
I've installed both qmail and vpopmail from ports. Qmail
- Original Message
From: John L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In general I agree. The qmail port, unlike most of the other ports, is
> junk.
I didn't realize you're the author of O'Reilly's book on Qmail :)
I'll take your opinion a little more seriousl
7883- Original Message
From: Tom Ierna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I've installed qmail/vpopmail many ways - from source, using the instructions
> from qmailrocks and most recently using the instructions found here:
>
> http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/mail/toaster/in
John, there's a rationalle for using ports, you know. A very, very
strong argument in favor of them.
In general I agree. The qmail port, unlike most of the other ports, is
junk.
Would you mind telling me how to get vpopmail working?
If you really want to know, please read chapter
On Nov 18, 2006, at 4:50 PM, Rachel Florentine wrote:
Well, going to that page led me to this as the authority for vpopmail:
http://dev.qmailrocks.org/qmail/freebsd/vpopmail_std.htm
I've installed qmail/vpopmail many ways - from source, using the
instructions from qmailrocks and
But...I already have qmail working from port!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:local/vpopmail/bin (106) ps|grep qmail
368 con- S 0:00.93 supervise qmail-send
370 con- S 0:00.91 supervise qmail-smtpd
813 con- I 0:00.02 qmail-lspawn ./Mailbox
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:local/vpopmail/bin (107)
Why
- Original Message
From: John L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Why would I want to rip out a perfectly good installation?
>
> Because it's not perfectly good. Many of the patches only sort of work.
>
>> I just want to get vpopmail working with qmail.
> I
Don't install qmail from the port, which includes a whole bunch of
ill-advised patches. Instead, download and install netqmail 1.05 from
www.qmail.org, which has a small set of patches that really work.
I've been meaning to make a port of netqmail, but haven't had time yet.
Y
1 - 100 of 351 matches
Mail list logo
