Hi,
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Jim Greene jim.gre...@gmail.com wrote:
-Don't show any individual hosts, only the aggregate and the
load/network/etc levels for the whole cluster
we did this on the main page for grids by adding one line of php that
excluded the bulk of our computing grid.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Vladimir Vuksan vl...@vuksan.com wrote:
If you lose a day or
two or even a week of trending data that is not gonna be disaster as long
as that data is present somewhere else.
sure, but where? how would the ganglia frontend tell?
Thus I proposed a simple
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Vladimir Vuksan vli...@veus.hr wrote:
I think you guys are complicating much :-). Can't you simply have multiple
gmetads in different sites poll a single gmond. That way if one gmetad fails
data is still available and updated on the other gmetads. That is what
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
care...@sajinet.com.pe wrote:
a) you are only concerned with redundancy and not looking for
scalability - when I say scalability, I refer to the idea of maybe 3 or
more gmetads running in parallel collecting data from huge numbers of
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
One problem I've been wondering about recently is the scalability of
gmetad/rrdtool.
[cut]
In a particularly large organisation, moving around the RRD files as
clusters grow could become quite a chore. Is anyone
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Jesse Becker haw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:35, Brad Nicholes bnicho...@novell.com wrote:
How well does this fit into the previous discussions of using a GUID to
identify a box rather than an IP or FQDN? Are aliasing and GUID identifiers
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Jesse Becker haw...@gmail.com wrote:
The GUID discussion I refered to was if gmond/gmetad should be
rewritten, top-to-bottom, to use GUIDs instead of relying on DNS/IP
addresses. My understanding is that everything would have use them,
including the .rrd files
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Vladimir Vuksan vli...@veus.hr wrote:
I guess a lot of the conversation depends on what you want and expect
Ganglia to be used for. For example there are a lot of people out there
that are using Ganglia for performance monitoring and using Nagios NRPE
to get
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Bernard Li bern...@vanhpc.org wrote:
Forwarding this to ganglia-developers since this is a more -devel
related discussion. Also can get spike's opinions in ;-)
remember that you asked for it :P
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Vladimir Vuksan vli...@veus.hr
Hi,
our gmetad boxes (2 of them) with 12 data sources, 6 of which are
gmetad and 6 gmonds, are spamming syslog like mad with the following
message:
Sep 6 06:33:32 localhost.localdomain /usr/sbin/gmetad[2526]:
RRD_update (/var/lib/ganglia/rrds/...metric.rrd): illegal attempt to
update using time
Hi,
recently we added better monitoring for our ganglia infrastructure and
one of the checks for gmetad contacts it on port 8651, looks for some
XML string and exits (receiving 20+ MBs of xml every time we run the
check isn't an option). The 'exists' part means sending a RST before
gmetad has
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Spike Spiegelfsm...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for your input,
I've given this a go and there's a patch attached to this email that
I'd like to hear comments about. I've never used apr before, but based
on the documentation [1] apr_array_push will allocate new
Hi,
we have a setup with 2 unicast channels and we recently ran across an
issue where we lost a bunch of metrics submitted with gmetric due to a
problem with dns that made one of the two channels unreachable. I
traced this back to libgmond.c and
Ganglia_udp_send_channels_create(...) where the
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Rick Cobb rc...@quantcast.com wrote:
My thought
is that the fewer underlying services a monitoring system needs to work, the
more likely it is to work.
Absolutely, but dns itself is actually a good example of how
introducing a dependency was necessary to make a
Hi,
provided that I haven't had the time to look at this part of the code
yet and that I agree it would be much nicer to have a gmetric-like
behavior,
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:21 AM, David Stainton dstainton...@gmail.com wrote:
I like using gmetric to monitor... so I wrote gmetric-daemon
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
care...@sajinet.com.pe wrote:
the interactive port was designed to mimic the behaviour from the
original gmetad port which always returns the whole tree.
why's that? if I wanted the whole tree I'd query the non interactive
port,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Brad Nicholes bnicho...@novell.com wrote:
* http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2009-0242
Ganglia 3.1.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via
a request to the gmetad service with a path does not exist, which causes
Ganglia
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Brad Nicholes bnicho...@novell.com wrote:
Yep, I was also thinking that a RESTful output module for gmetad-python would
probably be the easiest solution
I haven't used gmetad-python yet so one concern would be performances
and how it'd behave having to
Hi,
right now when gmetad fails an error is logged and in some cases the
connection to the client interrupted returning invalid XML or in other
cases (item not found or broken request) the entire tree is returned.
This imho is bad behavior and code should be added to inform the
client of the
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
care...@sajinet.com.pe wrote:
other than that looks good to me.
could you check the simplified one?, this problem was introduced in
2003 and therefore affects all versions of ganglia since then (including
2.5.7 which is not supported
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
care...@sajinet.com.pe wrote:
agree, but that is to be done in the context of getting multi-patch
committed and backported, but not in fixing this buffer overflow in the
interactive port, which is what BUG223 is about.
ok, guess I'll
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:04 AM, john allspaw jalls...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hey all -
Wondering if there's ever been any talk about serving up the interactive port
info via REST?
I am kinda working on this already although not in the form of a
ganglia patch, but as an external application
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Kostas Georgiou
k.georg...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 01:41:53PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 1/15/2009 at 8:56 AM, in message
496efa2a02ac0003a...@lucius.provo.novell.com, Brad Nicholes
bnicho...@novell.com wrote:
After taking a
23 matches
Mail list logo
