On 12/4/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: bayard
> Date: Mon Dec 4 12:34:35 2006
> New Revision: 482344
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=482344
> Log:
> Fixed up the Digester news item to inline the l
On 12/4/06, Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Why not just move all of the content of all of these pages to the
>> wiki and
>> change the links.
>> Or better still have a section of "wiki links" in the right hand nav for
>> them.
>
> Linking to pages in the wiki is bad, I think.
On 12/4/06, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. Vendor support. This is getting increasingly threadbare - so
> raising the removal of this again. Content to be moved to the Wiki.
Why not just move all of the content of all of these pages to the wiki and
change the links.
Or better stil
Back on a kick to clean up the site a bit more.
Removals:
1. Remove the faqs page. It's getting low on content.
2. Vendor support. This is getting increasingly threadbare - so
raising the removal of this again. Content to be moved to the Wiki.
3. Removal of the JSPA Agreement link. It's very d
;t find one for commons-fileupload)?
Thanks,
-dain
On Nov 2, 2006, at 12:38 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Our (Commons) nightly build machine (vmbuild.apache.org) was on a
> vmware zone that hasn't come back after the machine migration. It took
> care of both the nightly dist build
Our (Commons) nightly build machine (vmbuild.apache.org) was on a
vmware zone that hasn't come back after the machine migration. It took
care of both the nightly dist build and the m1 snapshot repo
deployments.
I'll pester for info again on it tomorrow; last I heard was that we
don't have vmware
With my JIRA Admin hat on, I've decided that my idea to have separate
Jakarta dev and admin groups was dumb and I've rolled the two together
and given Jakarta developers admin rights (which just means they can
change versions/components pretty much).
Hen
-
Bit late, but I don't see anything on the list about this recently so
thought I'd remind/inform people that there's a Jakarta BOF at 9pm
tomorrow (Wednesday) night. I'm not sure of the room, but it's the
same one as the Directory BOF.
Hen
-
jars should be on iBiblio for Maven
users as soon as the sync runs.
Please report any problems to either the commons-dev mailing list or
our JIRA instance (see the Lang site at
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/lang/ for more details).
Henri Yandell
on behalf of the Commons community
On 9/26/06, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Folks,
with the voting over and the discussion about the finer print of the
Charter dying down, how does this now continue? As I can see, this must
now become an official request to the board which then must be
approved.
Who sends
The ISP appear to be having problems. Joe's on it and will be moving
to the backups (minotaur) if they don't have things fixed soon enough
(few hours).
Babelfish translation of the surfnet.nl info:
quasi: "There is at present SURFnet network jamming as a result of
which a number of IP does not c
+1
On Sep 15, 2006, at 9:27 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
> The Velocity project has for some time now been making plans for a
> proposal to the board that the Velocity projects leave the Jakarta
> umbrella and become their own top level project. Martin has asked us
> to hold a vote on the proposal
t the attachment you mention below now works.
Also commented the infra issue and assigned to Jeff to see if he thinks
anything needs to be investigated.
Hen
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Henri Yandell wrote:
Sorry, that was just a quick 'I noticed jira was bounced' before heading out
the d
st. No idea why they wouldn't exist
though.
Hen
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Will Glass-Husain wrote:
Are you sure? Henri, would you mind trying again? Try:
IntrospectionCacheDataTest-no-copyright.java
maybe there's something specific wrong. I tried it not logged in and logged
in.
WILL
On
All 4 jiras were bounced around Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:24:48 +0100 (BST);
which I think was between your two emails (too early to think). So things
might be fixed.
Hen
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
I tried downloading all attachments and I have no problems.. Not saying this
i
Easy one first - the site definitely needs to say 'Apache Lucene' when it
refers to Lucene the ASF project rather than Lucene Consulting or Lucene
in Action. It should also say Apache HTTP Server or Apache Web Server
(whatever the name is this month) rather than just Apache.
Harder one - I d
Assuming I get to the conference, I'll be there.
Hen
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Will Glass-Husain wrote:
I'll be there...
On 8/24/06, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool :) Let's do this at dinner, since there are only 2 of us ;)
Hehehe :-)
...from experience I am sure a few more pe
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
SVN (Aug 11 data)
2273 - commons
747 - jmeter
282 - httpcomponents
159 - poi
129 - site
121 - jcs
85 - velocity
69 - bcel
58 - turbine
31 - cactus
19 - bsf
13 - taglibs
10 - slide
6 - oro
4 - regexp
2 - ecs
Who knew that JMeter was far and
Torsten's emails got me wondering what our activity was looking like this
year per project.
Mail: (Aug 19 data)
(includes commits, wiki, jira, bugzilla noise)
9486 - jakarta-commons-dev
3140 - jakarta-jmeter-user
2459 - jakarta-commons-user
1788 - jakarta-jmeter-dev
1512 - jakarta-httpclient
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> Why that combination? ...feels quite unnatural to me - I am sure so it
will
> for the users.
It's our list of small largely inactive subprojects. We know that none of
those are going to go TLP, and their dev lists are quiet by an order of
magnitude
JSPA stuff - will ping Geir about moving this stuff over to the JCP side
of things. There are some pdfs and a couple of html pages.
Will do this stuff on Monday night, which should give people time to yell
at me before then :)
Hen
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Henri Yandell wrote:
I think that the
I think that the Incubator has the right concept/label in retiring
projects, so I plan to create a link on the right hand side of the Jakarta
site called Retired Projects and to create a retired page that contains
links to the Alexandria site and the java.apache.org site.
If anyone feels -1-
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Torsten Curdt wrote:
The problem with moving Commons up is that when you look at where Jakarta
needs to go, and when you look at where Commons generally is now; they are
the same places - and it's hard to distinguish between the focuses.
Hm... interesting... funnily I ha
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Torsten Curdt wrote:
I am not really sure how to solve this. I am just ranting. For a few
projects I think they should go toplevel. For the ones I am involved
in at least jakarta commons surely deserves it (not looking into the
naming problem for now). Having a few more to
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
Thanks, Dennis. That helps and I agree with your arguments for inheritence
in genera;.
But why a Jakarta parent?
I'll leave that one for Henri to answer.
Do I look like I know what I'm doing? :)
The Jakarta pom is there be
First few commit messages bounced on this btw, until I fixed that up. It's
a maven2 parent pom for Jakarta projects. Created under advice from Brett
on #maven :)
Hen
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bayard
Date: Thu Aug 10 21:03:21 2006
New Revision: 430653
URL: http:/
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Henri,
What is the procedure for PMC nominations these days? I would like to
propose Roland for PMC nomination. He's been an indispensable member of
the HttpComponents project for many years. What list am I supposed to
send the proposal to? jakarta-
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Matt Benson wrote:
--- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Matt Benson wrote:
Henri, out of sheer curiosity, where is it
documented
that a commons committer doesn't have a binding
vote?
The only thing I could find in the charter
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Roland Weber wrote:
Hello Henri,
I'm one of those whom it concerns: committer but not PMC.
So being on a PMC means that your legal protection is something you're
supposed to be proactive about
Meaning that a PMC member should get an insurance that covers the cost
of la
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Hi,
well, I always thought that the PMC also has a legal role for the code
that it governs? So there might be committers that don't want to be on
the PMC for that reason.
Yeah, it does. The binding vote of the pmc, which provides oversight f
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Matt Benson wrote:
Henri, out of sheer curiosity, where is it documented
that a commons committer doesn't have a binding vote?
The only thing I could find in the charter [1] was a
link to the Jakarta guidelines [2], which in turn
links to a "Decision Making" page [3], which
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Yoav Shapira wrote:
I think the separation is valid. Jim put it nicely earlier today
(paraphrased here): committership is the right to vote a code base,
PMC membership is the right to oversee a project. In my mind there
definitely is a separation, and the latter requires
Being on a PMC means two actionable things. Firstly, you get a binding
vote; and secondly, you can subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - a list which
should be pretty quiet (mostly it's just vote results now - would be nice
to move those to this list).
The purpose of the binding vote is that that
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Danny Angus wrote:
On 29/07/06, J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My point is, I think we need to come up with a solution that can scale
across Apache so that we can send a consistent message to our users.
I thought that we already had one for dormant projects:
not
Pretty sure it's been done by each group separately. Phil just got the
Commons ones working again on a vmbuild zone - a rewrite (I think) of
scripts Craig has been running for ages.
Glenn (I think) runs some nightlies for the Taglibs on a machine of his
etc.
Hen
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Will G
ards
Henning
On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 13:25 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Hi, folks!
Recently, worries about the state of the Slide project came up in
private lists. It seems to be more or less unsupported and no
community s
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Hi, folks!
Recently, worries about the state of the Slide project came up in
private lists. It seems to be more or less unsupported and no
community seems to exist any more. Most posts to the lists remain
unanswered.
Additionally, I have heard vo
The version changed due to non-backwards compatible API changes:
http://people.apache.org/~dims/commons-modeler-2.0-RC1/
Hen
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Kevan Miller wrote:
Dims,
I can't access your URL.
--kevan
On Jul 19, 2006, at 12:45 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Hi Team,
Here's the new cut o
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
You don't have commit rights to Turbine, so no on the Turbine JIRA bit.
??? Scott Eade sent message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to announce the vote result. Is something wrong with
the vote?
You don't have commit rights to Turbine, so no on the Turbine JIRA bit.
Torque is a db.apache.org project, but I can't see why they'd not want a
committer to have developer rights so have added you to that group.
Hen
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
Could some kind soul please add
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Henri Yandell wrote:
There's a security related one in front of the board this month, which has
much of the same issues as the testing one so (I reckon) that'll be just as
educational as pushing the current testing thoughts to the board.
This resolution was p
Done. jakarta-admin and jakarta-developer groups added.
Hen
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Aaron Smuts wrote:
Can someone please give the user asmuts developer
rights to the JCS project on JIRA.
Cheers,
Aaron
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Done.
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Would be usefull to add me to JIRA admin (I know what I am doing, did jira
admin at codehaus) :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Henri Yandell wrote:
There are two different concepts of admin.
Firstly, there's a jakarta-admin group; which ha
There are two different concepts of admin.
Firstly, there's a jakarta-admin group; which has the ability to
administer projects that use the jakarta permission scheme. Secondly
there's jira admin, which is needed to add people to the jakarta groups.
Anyone on the PMC is eligible for the jaka
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
There are rumours people are interested in a beer chitchat BOF kind of
thing :)
Say tonight 8pm at the bar?
Shit, haven't had a computer with me during afternoon.
Why such a tight timetable? Would be nice if there were 24 hours between
the ann
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, peter royal wrote:
On Jun 27, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
There are rumours people are interested in a beer chitchat BOF kind of
thing :)
Say tonight 8pm at the bar?
i think you started the rumour, but sure!
Best way to start one.
Sounds good.
Hen
-
Very good thread that I think is heading in the right direction. My
thinking is that it should continue for the next month and be put in front
of the board then if it has reached a good state.
There's a security related one in front of the board this month, which has
much of the same issues
Here's our quarterly report on the state of Jakarta. Many thanks to Phil
for taking care of things and getting it in to the board.
It's been applied to the website in the usual place:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/pmc/board-report-june2006.html
Will take an hour or something to get rsync'd
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Phil Steitz wrote:
I was not planning to attend the board mtg - I just volunteered to fill
in by preparing the Jakarta report and submitting it on Hen's behalf. I
don't think delegates / proxies are allowed at board mtgs. I am happy
to do whatever I can to help make sur
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 6/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
> Per the umbrella concern, the question then becomes what -- if any --
> are the mitigating factors that can address such a concern wi
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 6/9/06, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
> Per the umbrella concern, the question then becomes what -- if any --
> are the mitigating factors that can address such a concern with
> regards to this proposal. Based on H
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 6/6/06, Felipe Leme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, answering your question, yes, the project is supposed to support
libraries from another languages. In fact, the existence of such
libraries is an argument for the TLP creation; besides the existin
Should have sent this a week or two ago.
The proposed resolution for a testing.apache.org was tabled until next
month (ie: June 21st) because the board were concerned about yet another
umbrella - with this one feeling too artificial.
They made the point that size of TLP is not a concern - jm
Reminder from Infra to make sure the directories are 775 and the files are
664 on distribution and web directories on people.apache.org.
ie) /www/jakarta.apache.org/ and /www/www.apache.org/dist/
The easy way to do this is to type:
umask 2
before making changes to those directories.
The ea
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
I think it would be worth asking whether or not a "copyright" notice without
specified years is actually meaningful. My expectation is that it would not
- i.e. that it would not imbue the pages with copyright protection at all.
I guess the first questi
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, sebb wrote:
At present, all the pages contain the footer:
Copyright (c) 1999-2005, The Apache Software Foundation. _Legal information_
where _Legal information_ is a link to the legal page (which
definitely needs updating to 2006!)
IIUC, the new footer would just be:
_L
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 5/31/06, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I updated the stylesheet to change the Copyright statement from
1999-2005 to 1999-2006 a week or so ago.
Of course this changes all the generated HTML
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 5/31/06, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I updated the stylesheet to change the Copyright statement from
1999-2005 to 1999-2006 a week or so ago.
Of course this changes all the generated HTML pages.
I've not yet updated them, as I wanted to doub
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Bill Barker wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 2:26 PM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: Commons-modeler release request
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Yoav Shapira wrote:
This is indicative of a
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Yoav Shapira wrote:
This is indicative of a larger problem with Commons I think - why are
people not attracted into getting involved with the commons source and
instead have their own versions?
Not sure. With modeler, and dbcp, and maybe other commons projects,
they wer
On Wed, 24 May 2006, David Jencks wrote:
I see that this issue is now in JIRA I couldn't find jira/modeler when I
filed the bugs, was I blind or have these been imported from bugzilla
recently?
We moved to JIRA a week ago - so very recent :)
Hen
---
I'm more surprised to hear that Tomcat have a fork of modeler; I thought
it was Tomcat that created it in the first place.
This is indicative of a larger problem with Commons I think - why are
people not attracted into getting involved with the commons source and
instead have their own versi
:)
Was pointed out to me last night.
When minotaur had problems and we flipped over to ajax, the rsync'd copy
on ajax had the wrong permissions, so it broke again. Thanks to Roy
Fielding for figuring that out and fixing it.
Hen
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Will Glass-Husain wrote:
This seems to
Okay - will send it up to the board for inclusion in the next board
meeting.
Hen
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Felipe Leme wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
The answer, I believe, is that "yes testing.apache.org would welcome
communities built around non-Java test tools. ". ie) No indeciphe
ng (PMC Members) votes in order they were received
+1 Felipe Leme
+1 Peter Lin
+1 Yoav Shapira
+0 Sebastian Bazley
+0 Henri Yandell
+1 Vincent Massol
+1 Stephen Colebourne
+1 Scott Eade
+1 Rahul Akolkar
+1 Henning Schmiedehausen
+1 Martin van den Bemt
+1 Dion Gillard
---
+10 total
*** Non-binding
s and Tapestry.
Hen
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henri Yandell wrote:
I think this is a fairly unexciting concept, so rather than voting on it I'll
just state that I (or a volunteer(?)) am going to do this and see if anyone
-1s.
As Felipe pointed out, it's a pain in the arse not being a devel
Given that I had to moderate this through, it means the verizon address is
not subscribed to this list. Scanning the list of subscribed emails, I
can't see another one with the login of resohenw.
Any idea which email address you are subscribed with?
Hen
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Rob wrote:
Ple
The Web Components thread is much older than the recent set of threads, it
was back in 2005. So I don't think we've heard your reasons against a JWC
Sub-Project as opposed to the not-community-of-community threads.
I can find this on wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/CreatingCommonsForWeb
Let's get this vote over with, TLP resolution (if such is the consensus)
etc, then we can vote latka and commons-test in its direction.
commons-test needs a release as Apache Discovery have releases that are
dependent on its snapshot version.
Hen
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, [iso-8859-1] Jörg Scha
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Felipe Leme wrote:
[ ] +1 I am favorable to the move and would like to contribute to the new TLP
[ ] +1 I am favorable to the move but would not be participating in the new TLP
[ X ] +0 it does not matter to me
[ ] -1 I am against it because
I support the move, a
At jakarta.apache.org we say:
1/
"The Jakarta Project offers a diverse set of open source Java solutions
and is a part of The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) which encourages a
collaborative, consensus-based development process under an open software
license."
2/
Our charter (http://jakart
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Torsten Curdt wrote:
However Jakarta-sandbox is
SCOPELESS. Go have a scopeless sandbox on sourceforge IMO. If you want
to start a whole NEW project then do that in the incubator IMO.
Why on sourceforge - why not on our infrastructure?
What the difference for you?
You
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 4/10/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 22:31 -0400, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Yes. A lot of things predate the incubator. I'm not opposed to say an
HTTPD-sandbox for experimental HTTPD related stuff.
I'm n
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Nathan Bubna wrote:
On 4/8/06, Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
-1 on these points
1. There should not be an escape from the pain of the incubator. All
new projects must go throu
y
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
-1 on these points
1. There should not be an escape from the pain of the incubator. All new
projects must go through the incubator and endure. Commons sandbox was
created
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Rainer Klute wrote:
Am Freitag, den 07.04.2006, 19:17 -0400 schrieb Henri Yandell:
Calling a vote to create a Jakarta Sandbox; which entails:
* Move Jakarta Commons Sandbox to Jakarta Sandbox
* Migrate Jakarta Taglibs Sandbox into Jakarta Sandbox
* Create
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
-1 on these points
1. There should not be an escape from the pain of the incubator. All new
projects must go through the incubator and endure. Commons sandbox was
created prior to the incubator.
Nope, all new communities must go through the in
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 16:28 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 4/7/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Calling a vote to create a Jakarta Sandbox; which entails:
* Move Jakarta Commons Sandbox to Jakarta Sandbox
* Migrate Jakarta T
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 4/7/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Calling a vote to create a Jakarta Sandbox; which entails:
* Move Jakarta Commons Sandbox to Jakarta Sandbox
* Migrate Jakarta Taglibs Sandbox into Jakarta Sandbox
* Create devel
Calling a vote to create a Jakarta Sandbox; which entails:
* Move Jakarta Commons Sandbox to Jakarta Sandbox
* Migrate Jakarta Taglibs Sandbox into Jakarta Sandbox
* Create development mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Create wiki (and migrate wiki bits from j-c-s/j-t-s)
* Jakarta Sandbox
easymock is not an Apache project, so no idea there.
Ant isn't a Jakarta project, see ant.apache.org, however I don't think it
ships with anything to warrant needing an ECCN. If you see something in
there that you think is relevant, then contacting Ant would be a good way
to go.
Hen
On Fri
I think this is a fairly unexciting concept, so rather than voting on it
I'll just state that I (or a volunteer(?)) am going to do this and see if
anyone -1s.
As Felipe pointed out, it's a pain in the arse not being a developer for
other Jakarta projects in Jira, given that he can now commit
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Felipe Leme wrote:
Hi Hen,
On 4/3/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Following this email I'll modify things such that we have the following
auth groups:
jakarta (union of all jakarta-* groups + tapestry)
jakarta-pmc (remains the same)
jakarta-comm
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Henri Yandell wrote:
Vote to remove the SVN barriers within Jakarta such that all jakarta-* groups
are merged into the one jakarta group with the exception of jakarta-hivemind,
jakarta-slide, jakarta-cactus and jakarta-jmeter under the assumption that
they are moving to
You don't have write access to the jakarta/site directory in subversion.
Tomorrow I'll close the vote on reducing svn restrictions and everyone in
the Jakarta group will have access to the site (including the Tapestry
committers).
Hen
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
I could be do
I forgot to state that :(
I'll send a result thread on Sunday morning (PST).
Hen
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
+1
(It would be good to know how long the vote period is.)
Best regards
Henning
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 02:50 -0500, Henri Ya
Here's how I think things would work with TLP stuff.
* If, for example, ECS goes to to TLP, we would create the ecs list out of
the people forming the PMC.
* Committers 'leaving' with a TLP should be welcome to remain part of the
jakarta list (I'm going to go ahead and make sure all of the T
Vote to remove the SVN barriers within Jakarta such that all jakarta-*
groups are merged into the one jakarta group with the exception of
jakarta-hivemind, jakarta-slide, jakarta-cactus and jakarta-jmeter under
the assumption that they are moving to having their own PMCs. Tapestry is
already
Thanks for catching that Rahul :)
Hen
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Apache Wiki wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/TLPSlide
The com
useless blurb at the top and just have
commons.a.o rechartered to be a virtual front for commons.*.a.o?
Sanjiva.
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 08:43 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
Excellent!
Sanjiva.
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 19:44 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
Here you go:
http://commons.apache.org/
Here you go:
http://commons.apache.org/
Hen
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Henri Yandell wrote:
I'll give it a shot.
A link from commons.apache.org to Jakarta Commons, XML Commons and WS Commons
seems pretty fair.
Hen
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/13/06, Sandy McA
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hola,
So anymore thoughts? Shall we vote on the wiki page as a whole, rather
than individual items?
Definitely individual items: Stefano (Mazzocchi) had a really nice
message once on another list about pursuing a policy of small
reversible steps ins
Thought I'd bring Stephen's wiki page up:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/OneCommunityProposals
It wraps a lot of what we've been talking about, and I'm wondering what
people think now that there's a nice summary to let it be visualized.
Just to get a feeling for what this applies to, the fol
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, robert burrell donkin wrote:
when a software grant is received, it's important that the actual
donated code is recorded in the repository: the actual code donated is
identified by it's MD5 sum. it seems best to me to adopt a single drop
point in jakarta for these grants. i
No problem Karthik, happens to us all. :)
Hen
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Karthik Kumar wrote:
Hi...
I'm extremely sorry for this... Someone was spamming :(
Karthik
On 3/19/06, J??rg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 23:3
I'm assuming at the moment that this is a case of somebody spoofing
Karthik's address. I doubt the spam is from Karthik - just something that
snuck through the spamassassin and various other email controls and
happens to be a subscribed address.
Hen
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Frank W. Zammetti wr
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
My proposal is that we create a file in SVN in which PMC members can list
themselves as being active. After 1 month, failure to appear in that list
will result in removal from the PMC.
Why not just send out e-mail to the PMC members asking them if
s stuff is very
interesting to be thinking about; but hopefully it gives you a bit of an
idea of my reasons and direction so it seems less sly.
Replying inline about the particular issue:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Sandy McArthur wrote:
On 3/16/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Sandy McArthur wrote:
On 3/16/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Previously I'd suggested that we should be cleaning up inactive committers
and inactive PMC members - because I'm a bit of a tidy-addict sometimes
and I enjoy deleting :)
A
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/16/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Previously I'd suggested that we should be cleaning up inactive committers
and inactive PMC members - because I'm a bit of a tidy-addict sometimes
and I enjoy deleting :)
A
101 - 200 of 782 matches
Mail list logo
