> encouraging use of farm land for energy and CDR as a second competing
> market for food should help all farmers and ag states - as well as the
> climate.*
>
> * There are probably other “geo” examples in the disaggregated analysis
> that Fred recommends.*
>
> *Ron*
&
This is an interesting article that breaks down the state by state results
by industry sector in a way that suggests a more granular rethink of
climate change policy is needed than I think your article suggests. Not
being negative, just suggesting that success might require rebuilding
climate
An important but dangerous line of thought, as it implies questions like
"Green Amazon v. Amber Amazon": rain forest v. savannah?
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:42 AM, Andrew Lockley
wrote:
> Attached
>
> Earth’s Future
> White Arctic vs. Blue Arctic: A case study of
Thoughts? I'm having a difficult time evaluating significance of this.
https://news.uic.edu/breakthrough-solar-cell-captures-co2-and-sunlight-produces-burnable-fuel
Researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago have engineered a
potentially game-changing solar cell that cheaply and
oxide removal reduces the motivation to deploy solar
> geoengineering.
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 07:52 Fred Zimmerman <geoengineerin...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> What I find interesting about this is that it had seemed to me that this
>> community
>> had
What I find interesting about this is that it had seemed to me that
this community
had largely moved on to CDR & especially BECCS as the preferred mechanism,
most people accepting David Keith's view of SAI as a last-ditch option for
slowing the rate of change. Do others agree with my formulation?
May I ask the group members each to nominate a top 5? (or 3, or 1, or 10,
whatever you like?)
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Ken Caldeira wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> I would add Kwiatkowski et al. (ERL, 2015) which performed the first
> simulations of effects of ocean
What could possibly go wrong: how would this plan prevent enterprising
entrepreneurs from "harvesting" the atmospheric diamond dust and
repurposing it for "bling" or industrial applications?
ᐧ
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Andrew Lockley
wrote:
>
>
It becomes more problematic if we think about the precedent of selecting
for super resilient individuals of every species ...
ᐧ
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Greg Rau wrote:
> Thinly disguised GMO? How did this evade ETC's and CBD's super sensitive
> radar?
> Greg
>
>
>
ease could reach the
> gigaton per annum level, raising global concentration very rapidly and
> kiboshing efforts to curb global warming.
>
> What to do? Try cooling the Arctic while developing methods to suppress
> methane, e.g. diatom food and nutrients for methanotrophs.
>
> C
, they can detect a launch faster than ever, more accurately
identify the missile type, ...
Fred Zimmerman
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
*PageKicker <http://www.pagekicker.com/> -- real-time, customized, mobile,
social deep contentNimble Books LLC -- innovative, idiosyncratic
independent pub
or climate/geo research,
not a good omen.
Fred Zimmerman
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
*PageKicker <http://www.pagekicker.com/> -- real-time, customized, mobile,
social deep contentNimble Books LLC -- innovative, idiosyncratic
independent publisher on military, naval, and politics*
ᐧ
--
You r
Worrisome but as with all these bubble studies the data is sparse relative
to the area covered so difficult to make any firm conclusions. A major
large area study is needed: lots of sensors or a new remote sensing
optoelectronic seismological or sonar technique exploiting bubble
phenomenology.
$43T in damages seems like a lot to me, especially if spread over a century
or the period 2015-2100. Global GDP is about $78T.
I don't have access to the article, so can't comment in detail, but if I
did I would be trying to figure out what they imply is $T/degC/year. While
a cost of a few
I ran this by my pal Pete Jones who is an expert on system design among
other things (redesignresearch.com) and here is what he had to say:
>
> Seems to me like a provocation to consider a large-scale engineering
> design approach to analysis, identification of points to induce effects,
> and to
your criticism of the paper is not
fair. Also, in the context of the question being asked, a 37 day test was
an entirely reasonable first attempt at addressing the question.
Chris.
On Sunday, July 26, 2015 at 9:27:43 PM UTC+1, Fred Zimmerman wrote:
I don't see where this paper addresses my
For skimmers:
The conclusions drawn from this body of work, which applied widely used
algorithms to estimate coral bleaching8 , are that we must either accept
that the loss of a large percentage of the world’s coral reefs is
inevitable, or consider technological solutions to buy those reefs time
An interesting piece indeed that would be more useful if it offered
proposals as well as raising questions. One gets the impression that the
author's idea of appropriate visuality would be a 24/7 loop of the
destruction of the global environment by fossil fuels. But it's hard to
see how such a
Does this also mean bad news in that 1) terrestrial biotic sequestration
may be less effective than believed 2) this may affect crop productivity?
Also, does the article offer any numbers around the degree of soil loss and
whether this is across all latitudes?
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:08 AM,
Mark, I don't mean to be difficult, but I think the answer to this question
is plainly no and is likely to remain that way until such there is such
time as there is an unambiguous, impossible to rationalize away, real-time
climate catastrophe. This thread is talking about a large quasi-industrial
I think the most important implication of all findings of anticipated
changes in precipitation as a result of SRM -- of whatever degree or
direction -- is that they dramatically raise the bar for the level of
confidence (and therefore, amount of research) that would be needed to
achieve wide
I think people are concerned about conflict from geoengineering but I don't
think they are any more concerned about nuclear war risks from
geoengineering than from any other cause of conflict and probably much less
so. I would agree that preventing new causes of conflict is a credible
reason for
weapons.
-Jamais
On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Fred Zimmerman geoengineerin...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think people are concerned about conflict from geoengineering but I
don't think they are any more concerned about nuclear war risks from
geoengineering than from any other cause of conflict
Isn't this also relevant to sequestration strategies? It sounds as if
increased concentrations could create different results than currently
anticipated.
ᐧ
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Andrew Lockley andrew.lock...@gmail.com
wrote:
Poster's note : of interest to OIF researchers
means (Climate Intervention?) would seem our first priority for evaluation,
ahead of strategies for somehow becoming resilient to alternative outcomes.
Greg
--
*From:* Fred Zimmerman geoengineerin...@gmail.com
*To:* Andrew Lockley andrew.lock...@gmail.com
The link in Google Scholar to the PDF is wrong -- it is correct here at
Google Books
https://books.google.com/books?id=4M6AAgAAQBAJlpg=PP1ots=xkwc1eUYi9dq=piers%20blaikielrpg=PP1#v=onepageq=piers%20blaikief=false
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Fred Zimmerman geoengineerin...@gmail.com
wrote
There is a related Comment in a recent issue of Nature. If I may
summarize: the most cost-effective form of adaptation to climate change
catastrophes (whether single or multiple) is to improve resilience of
vulnerable individuals populations in every dimension -- health,
education, sanitation,
The article is quite right in my estimation that the most likely outcome
based on current trends is 500+ ppm and RCP 8.5. Where it is exaggerated is
in arguing that the lowest RCP scenario 2.6 is the only one that is
survivable or that exceeding it is equated to the survival of human
Fascinating couple of pages about the bromine bomb in Fleming FIXING THE SKY
https://books.google.com/books?id=zmdBon09PY0Clpg=PA220ots=WFitxrgPu2dq=bromine%20bombpg=PA220#v=onepageq=bromine%20bombf=false
ᐧ
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Adrian Tuck
dr.adrian.t...@sciencespectrum.co.uk wrote:
I am less concerned about outcomes for the major parties and their zones
in the scenario you describe than for the risk of incidental catastrophe
for largely uninvolved parties in particularly vulnerable areas like
sub-Saharan Africa. I think this is the concern Cush was hinting at in
his
Hi -- I agree with this skeptical assessment of certainty, especially with
regard to impacts on regional and subregional climates and biomes critical
to human life society, but as many on this list argue, the issue i
choosing between
a) BAU emissions with high confidence of major impacts 3-5C
trees down and bury them and do that over and over again every 10-20 years,
than to convert the land to a carbon-dense biome? That gives you ongoing
carbon removal, not just a one-time effect.
On Thu Feb 12 2015 at 8:16:40 AM Fred Zimmerman
geoengineerin...@gmail.com wrote:
A couple of weeks
Worth noting perhaps that the NAS has done careful studies of climate
impacts http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12877 so one response to
the limitations of the climate intervention study is to suggest that the
climate stabilization/impacts report be read together with the climate
Do you even need a proposed mechanism? From what I recall, both models and
observations struggle at the poles, and we know that we don't want to go
forward with SAI without a strong understanding of behavior at the poles.
Maybe we should be asking what will we need to do to improve models and
Well, yes, but despite the Cold War era fears, nuclear war has not yet
happened in 70 years, not just because of Andrew's common interest
argument, but because politicians and military men apparently reached the
conclusion that nuclear bombs were an ineffective way of coercing other
nations to do
?WT.mc_id=TWT_NatureNews
I am interested in thoughts from our biochars enthusiasts.
Fred Zimmerman
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
a fox, not a hedgehog -- Isaiah Berlin
http://www.design.caltech.edu/erik/Misc/Fox_Hedgehog.html
ᐧ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
The McGlade paper is indeed very important and well worth reading since it
works backwards from the 2-degree target to provide what amounts to a
regional hit list for declaring carbon resources unburnable (see Table 1
in the paper). Most of the Canadian oil and gas resources are found to be
methods of bringing together members of the
scientific
communities relevant to NASA, such as online discussion forums and
web-based collaboration
portals, especially in support of a traditional event. Proposals for
multiple related events should
be well justified.
Fred Zimmerman
Ann Arbor, Michigan
obstacles rather than passive
barriers such as lack of interest]
* What countries are the leaders in CDR research, development, investment,
and technologies?
I have my own ideas about the answers but am looking for sanity check.
Fred Zimmerman
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
a fox, not a hedgehog -- Isaiah
I am writing up a brief precis of this topic (GMO for CDR) but as I read
through this thread I'm not seeing any citations to journal articles. Can
someone provide me with citations to a few key papers?
ᐧ
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Lockley andrew.lock...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm very
Prof. Beget --
1) can you please explain the scale of operations that would be required to
achieve climatically significant reductions?
2) is there a termination scenario where SRM/CDR efforts including MEA are
abruptly terminated (say, because of political disorder), warming
accelerates, the
/1m9VXozADC0IIE6mYx5NsnJLrUvF_fWJN_GyigCzDLn0/pub
*
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Fred Zimmerman
geoengineerin...@gmail.com wrote:
In the spirit of making this discussion more realistic with regard to
broader consumption, let me put the obvious argument on the table, which
ᐧ
The finding in the last sentence is important especially given that the
impacts of climate change are likely to be felt most heavily by developing
countries. That's an important aspect of the equity arguments around
geoengineering that is not perhaps given enough weight in ethical
discussions
Many interesting developments in here.
1) We're getting better at real time observation of algal blooms thanks to
multi sensor multi band and multi platform devices (ARGO + satellite is a
potent combination) but not there yet.
2) Of particular note for the geoengineering community is the
, Olaf
Schuiling
*From:* geoengineering@googlegroups.com [mailto:
geoengineering@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Fred Zimmerman
*Sent:* woensdag 1 oktober 2014 18:58
*To:* Andrew Lockley
*Cc:* geoengineering
*Subject:* Re: [geo] 6 commercially viable ways to remove CO2 - Schuiling
Title
http://climatecolab.org/web/guest/plans/-/plans/contestId/1300209
Fred Zimmerman
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
a fox, not a hedgehog -- Isaiah Berlin
ᐧ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Many interesting developments in here.
1) We're getting better at real time observation of algal blooms thanks to
multi sensor multi band and multi platform devices (ARGO + satellite is a
potent combination) but not there yet.
2) Of particular note for the geoengineering community is the
Does this mean that carbon sequestration by preservation and afforestation
in boreal forests has more bang for the buck than in tropical forests?
Also, does this mean that there is an unexpected benefit of SRM influence
on hydrological system--longer carbon residence times?
Fred
*Researchers
18:37, Rau, Greg r...@llnl.gov wrote:
What qualifies as DAC CDR?
Greg
--
*From:* geoengineering@googlegroups.com [geoengineering@googlegroups.com]
on behalf of Fred Zimmerman [geoengineerin...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, August 29, 2014 7:02 PM
*To:* Mark
into a
table of DAC CDR cost estimates which we could all view.
Best,
Charlie
On Monday, August 25, 2014 10:17:58 PM UTC-7, Fred Zimmerman wrote:
Hi --
I am updating a literature review on cost estimates for DAC CDR and I am
wondering what has changed both empirically and analytically since
.
* Finally, we note that the fourfold discrepancy between our estimate of
contactor cost and that in the recent APS DAC report is due to
fundamentally different design choices, insufficient optimization in the APS
design and our choice of lower-cost contactor internals.
Fred Zimmerman
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Hi --
I am updating a literature review on cost estimates for DAC CDR and I am
wondering what has changed both empirically and analytically since the
flurry of papers in 2011-2013 with APS, House, Keith, Lackner et al.
Fred Zimmerman
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
a fox, not a hedgehog -- Isaiah
, and
are similarly expected to increase in a warming climate with enhanced
melting.
Fred Zimmerman
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
a fox, not a hedgehog -- Isaiah Berlin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Why not try to increase the duration and intensity of polar storms? We've
already got a good start on that with the massive ongoing global effort to
increase the intensity and frequency of extreme weather events.
Seriously, it baffles me that sometimes it seems that the response here to
every
http://www.adn.com/2014/05/14/3470442/air-force-prepares-to-dismantle.html?sp=/99/100/ihp=1
Fred Zimmerman
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
a fox, not a hedgehog -- Isaiah Berlin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To unsubscribe from
the potential of the marine environment as a
fuel/food/feed/fertilizer/freshwater/polymer (etc.) source.
Best,
Michael
On Monday, April 21, 2014 6:41:06 AM UTC-7, Fred Zimmerman wrote:
I have just been skimming through the IPCC AR5 appendix on bioenergy and
I see helpful estimates
I have just been skimming through the IPCC AR5 appendix on bioenergy and I
see helpful estimates of technical bioenergy potential for land but don't
see any estimates of technical potential for marine bioenergy -- are there
any good papers on that topic?
Fred
Fred Zimmerman
Ann Arbor, Michigan
If I remember correctly, terrestrial primary productivity is greater than
oceanic primary productivity. So isn't it a mistake also to regard the
oceans as a sort of reserve larder of biocapacity simply because they are
larger in area/volume than the terrestrial biosphere?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at
and be
detected.
I remember hearing David Keith express high confidence that we would be
able to detect SRM, this seems to take a different view. Thoughts?
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http
How much acidification is required to affect npp?
On Nov 28, 2013 4:04 PM, Ken Caldeira kcalde...@carnegiescience.edu
wrote:
Of course, even under rather extreme assumption, changes in planktonic
productivity can do little to slow the rising tide of ocean acidification.
(see Cao and Caldeira,
.
There is a value to driving up the scarcity, but a countervailing risk
that the fossil fuel assets will become less valuable due to technological
innovation or social change. Burn em or lose em (fuels and $$,
respectively). Surely very big numbers.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together
/journal/v458/n7242/extref/nature08017-s1.pdf
)
It's way too late to worry about whether the carbon emissions budget is a
useful framing device. the simple message is we're going to blow way past
our budget.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering
amounts of energy and manpower to operate – yet the committee asked
thoughtful follow-up questions.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net:8080
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:31 AM
for years to deployment
and RF per year and cost per unit of RF
has anyone done an exercise modeling the optimum mix across all methods/all
flavors? if some methods/flavors are disapproved? if values are modified?
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering
My quick reactions:
0) A good definition overall.
1) I observe that discussions in this group and in political advocacy about
geoengineering are spending a great deal of energy defining certain things
in and out of geoengineering. I think it is something of a time sink.
In the end the labels
Well, maybe what that says is that we should simply consider SRM in the
same context as mitigation and adaptation proposals. Everything winds up
coming out of the same RF/carbon budget. We need a global systems solution
anyway.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds
Hyped. N2O is a fraction of other RFs (0.18 w/m2 from 1750-2000 per Hansen
2005) and the proposed expansion a) is admittedly (!) a monoculture (!)
strategy and b) only affects a fraction of the agriculture N2O.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering
tell you that the bloom albedo value necessary for significant
radiative forcing too great to be plausible, which would save you the
trouble of doing imagery analysis.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http
that numerous independent academy-level review boards have drawn every
decade or so over the last sixty years, namely, that the efficacy of
activities intended to modify weather cannot be statistically demonstrated.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering
and on Thursdays!
If this is not helpful you needn't send it through to the group--just
thinking in response.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net:8080
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:57 AM
at depth and excrete near the surface.
Several other toothed whales do this, and some filter-feeding ones may do
too.
*Reference: *Proc Roy Soc B http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0863
*Image *by Cianchttp://www.flickr.com/photos/cianc/298211739/in/photostream/
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering
for climate
change).
Enough for the moment; too short on time to expound further and probably at
the useful limit for email anyway. Please no one be offended by my
paraphrase of your thoughts or words!
Cordially,
Fred Z.
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds
economy. Plus, this is defense procurement. All
that says to me ... .
Fred Zimmerman
Research Scientist
ISciences LLC
+1.734-214-9810 (office)
+1.734-531-6062 (home office)
--
You received this message because you
... Essentially, we would be paying 42-63 EUR/tonne CO2 to push
the CO2 X years into the future, where X is not that big a number (compared
to oceanic or geologic sequestration). I don't see our descendants
thanking us profusely for this particular effort, am I missing something?
---
Fred Zimmerman
Do forests sequester carbon with the same physical security and long time
span as the deep ocean or geologic structures? My impression from what
I've read is that forests can come and go on centennial scales.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering
will be inescapably present in much larger quantities: drones, cellphones,
autonomous floats divers, citizen observers, 3-D printers, wireless
appliances, and on and on,. Scientists should be thinking about how to take
advantage of these developments.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing
order of life innovations like aerobic bacteria, viruses,
etc.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net:8080
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Oliver Tickell
oliver.tick...@kyoto2
and lay the groundwork for the major dispositive studies that will
be undertaken at some point in the future when the frog feels the heat of
the water a bit more acutely.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter
For those interested in networking prior to the Harvard geoengineering
session, or for those who have attended summer schools in the past or may
attend in the future, Hollie Roberts at Harvard recommends this group:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/214837068555382/
---
Fred Zimmerman
solution. *
I am not crazy about identified by the scientific elite, I would prefer
the more objective and more accurate scientific method -- it's not the
eliteness that gives the threat credibility, it's the method.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds
geoengineering patent be
reserved for large-scale methods?
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net:8080
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Mick West m...@mickwest.com wrote:
It's not good
:31:49 UTC+1, Fred Zimmerman wrote:
has anyone got a good list of major geoengineering patents?
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net:8080
--
You received this message
has anyone got a good list of major geoengineering patents?
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net:8080
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
a complex story
here of unconscious geoengineering that is not well observed much less
well understood. Way too early to start shooting feldspar into the
atmosphere! ;-)
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http
. (Roe 2012).
Disadvantages of foo include P and Q. (Face of Bo 2012).
Cheers,
Fred
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net:8080
--
You received this message because you
would need much more granular data from much different set of sources
to capture what is actually happening in near real time.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net:8080
On Sat
with a
robust flexible and innovative response to climate change but do not wish
to be pigeonholed as members of a geoengineering professional society. I
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:52 PM, David Lewis jrandomwin...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm one of those who tend to believe civilization can only go so far down
a path of thoughtless interference with the planetary systems. I haven't
tried to assemble anything like a case that might convince a
the box: what human
and technical systems can we put in place that will facilitate making good
decisions about GE?
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net:8080
--
You received
at
the margins but consumers and businesses start to balk as soon as the cost
effect becomes significant. Even if ExxonMobil had never paid a climate
skeptic a dime, we would still have an energy system in which fossil fuel
emissions are dominant.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together
the evolution of knowledge throughout this period.
*Citation:* Brewer, P. G.: A short history of ocean acidification science
in the 20th century: a chemist's view, Biogeosciences Discuss., 10,
8715-8748, doi:10.5194/bgd-10-8715-2013, 2013.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds
a
somewhat different agenda than authors: they may have a somewhat keener
interest in making the subhead punchy as opposed to descriptively exact.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net
, it is clear that
we live on a human-dominated planet.
*
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net:8080
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
and accountability in a pragmatic
measureable and visible way, and we need to start building that into our
activities without waiting for a decadal governance debate to commence (let
alone conclude).
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_your_base_are_belong_to_us
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing
work.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net:8080
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Sam Carana sam.car...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
More than two years ago, I submitted a message
An excellent point. This is why I have been arguing for a holistic view of
anthopocene climate management that includes the full 15,000-year? span of
anthopocene modifications beginning with animal plant domestication
(never underestimate the land use / land cover modification ability of
sheep
..;.For better or worse Holocene == conserve.
I'd like to find a word that conveys human appropriation of net primary
productivity -- HANPPoforming?
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net
faster. This is the
warming has slowed argument.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net:8080
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
not
the planet?”
If the hubris there is too much for you, Hamilton balances it with a line
from another scientist, Ron Prinn: “How can you engineer a system you don’t
understand?”
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter
I like the idea of listing many (most?) of the known processes. I believe
that GE in general suffers from a lack of synoptic thinking as advocates of
individual technologies become single issue voters.
---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo