Dear developers,
thank you all for your feedback. I will try my best to show that GIMP is
a real rockin' project
and that there are quite good ideas in the pipes. I will try to bringing
up the point that
more developers are wanted.
Thanks.
___/\_
Michael Grosberg wrote:
> Martin Nordholts gmail.com> writes
>> But to be honest I think it is best if this magazine does not write
>> about what GIMP will get in 2009 simply because there is no way to make
>> guarantees. If they write about it they should emphasize that everything
>> is prelimina
Apologies to all:
I meant:
Dear Eckhard...
in my last email.
Nicolas Robidoux
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Nicolas Robidoux wrote:
> (I already imagine the headline when GIMP moves to GEGL: "The GIMP
> Starts Smoking.")
That is one possible headline although it should say "GIMP" and not "The GIMP".
--
Cheers!
Kevin.
http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"What are we going to do today, Borg?"
Owner of El
Hello Michael:
Would you be willing to write an article titled:
"GIMP's Wish List for 2009"
or something like it?
You may get more feedback from the developers if you drop "road map"
from the formulation, because unfortunately a "road map" sounds like
some sort of informal contract, with "fail
Martin Nordholts gmail.com> writes:
>
> Eckhard M. Jäger wrote:
> >
> > Dear Gimp Developers,
> >
> > the opensource mag T3N asked me about writing an outlook about GIMP in
> > 2009 and what users
> > can expect this year.
> But to be honest I think it is best if this magazine does not write
>
Eckhard M. Jäger wrote:
>
> Dear Gimp Developers,
>
> the opensource mag T3N asked me about writing an outlook about GIMP in
> 2009 and what users
> can expect this year.
Hi
I here talk a little about what we would like to get into 2.8:
http://jcornuz.wordpress.com/2008/12/27/an-exclusive-intervi
Dear Gimp Developers,
the opensource mag T3N asked me about writing an outlook about GIMP in
2009 and what users
can expect this year.
I can't find any save information or a roadmap about 2.7/ 2.8.
Is there a vision/ definition ehat will come this year?
Could you help me with it?
It mustn't be
Sven wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 00:06 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
>
>>> Where we are back at the point where this is not likely going to be
>>> ever
>>> possible on all supported platforms using the toolkit that we use
>>> and
>>> will continue to use.
>>
>> I am used to development teams te
On 07/11/2007, Alexandre Prokoudine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2007 2:40 AM, peter sikking wrote:
>
> > and something about text (layers), that is not so trivial in the UI btw,
> > text, svg and other vector stuff need their own stacking order within a
> > layer and if you want to avoid
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 00:06 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
> > Where we are back at the point where this is not likely going to be
> > ever
> > possible on all supported platforms using the toolkit that we use and
> > will continue to use.
>
> I am used to development teams telling me 'can't
Sven Neumann wrote:
>> well, obviously where one works with colors in the inspector that
>> part is either never or on mouse-over not going to be transparent.
>
> Where we are back at the point where this is not likely going to be
> ever
> possible on all supported platforms using the toolkit th
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 16:22 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
> well, obviously where one works with colors in the inspector that
> part is either never or on mouse-over not going to be transparent.
Where we are back at the point where this is not likely going to be ever
possible on all supported
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure this is the right time and place to argue, but from my
>> experience using Paint.Net, which has this functionality, transparent
>> palettes will absolutely useless and even annoying.
>
> I agree. Transparency will be distracting.
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 13:56 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> I'm not sure this is the right time and place to argue, but from my
> experience using Paint.Net, which has this functionality, transparent
> palettes will absolutely useless and even annoying.
I agree. Transparency will be dis
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 11:47 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
> > I don't think that "true floating inspectors" are implementable at
> > all.
> > But perhaps you need to explain first what "true floating" means.
>
> let's see: always on top of any normal window, but under menus and
> dialogs; do
On Nov 7, 2007 2:40 AM, peter sikking wrote:
> and something about text (layers), that is not so trivial in the UI btw,
> text, svg and other vector stuff need their own stacking order within a
> layer and if you want to avoid the question "are they above or in the
> layer pixels", then they need
Sven wrote:
>> * solve user request #1, part 1: one menu bar, keep window with
>>menu bar open when no image is open, true floating inspectors,
>>transparency where inspectors overlap the image (found a way
>>how it can be faked);
>
> I don't think that "true floating inspectors" are i
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 00:40 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
> * solve user request #1, part 1: one menu bar, keep window with
>menu bar open when no image is open, true floating inspectors,
>transparency where inspectors overlap the image (found a way
>how it can be faked);
I don't t
GIMPsters,
I was away for a couple of days and I see that in the mean
more task were volunteered that have an UI impact:
* metadata stuff (jpeg dialog)
* iWarp tool (right-on Tor!)
* jitter and smudge
and something about text (layers), that is not so trivial in the UI btw,
text, svg and other ve
Daniel Egger wrote:
> What I've seen just recently and deem as a good idea would be a
> possibility to make dialogs translucent (better yet, only if not
> currently focused) to reduce the screen estate necessary to manipulate
> an image. Anyone having an idea of the feasibility and complexity
> of
On 09.01.2005, at 18:39, William Skaggs wrote:
1) New rectangle select tool that allows adjustment of rectangle after
creation. (Implemented in my personal tree with the exception of
keybindings. Implemented as a separate tool, so it can be tested
and improved without losing the standard rect-sel
Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Now due to #3, what we have in CVS now (which is a cleaned-up version of
> before that) is incompatible with what he sent me. So either we clean-up/add
> some minor features (a better PDB entry, for example, which I added) to his
> version or we similarly engineer the CVS cod
On Sunday 09 January 2005 19:39, William Skaggs wrote:
> 4) Various enhancement to gimpressionist. (Implemented in my
> tree for quite some time.)
>
Hmmm... gimpressioninst...
Well, as you may well know, I've done a lot of cleanup and bug-squashing in
gimpressionist, so I have some investment i
Hi,
"William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is my personal roadmap of things I would like to be able to
> put into 2.4, assuming all goes well:
>
> 1) New rectangle select tool that allows adjustment of rectangle after
> creation. (Implemented in my personal tree with the exception o
Sven wrote:
> Actually, no code should be committed to CVS at the moment until we
> have made up a roadmap that outlines what we want to achieve with GIMP
> 2.4.
Here is my personal roadmap of things I would like to be able to
put into 2.4, assuming all goes well:
1) New rectangle select tool
Hi,
one of the things we discussed last week at GIMPCon was planning the
2.2 release. I didn't take notes from our discussions but I will try
to summarize the results and will also try to be more specific when it
comes to the features we'd like to see in 2.2.
We agreed that 2.2 will take some mor
27 matches
Mail list logo
