On 2/8/07, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > What I was trying to tell you is that that message exists, but doesn't
> > show up. Which means that something is broken ;-)
>
> It does show up. So the brokeness seems to be on your setup.
Both Ubuntu Feisty laptop at home and WinXP SP2 workstation at work? ;-)
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 10:41 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> What I was trying to tell you is that that message exists, but doesn't
> show up. Which means that something is broken ;-)
It does show up. So the brokeness seems to be on your setup.
Sven
__
On 2/8/07, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > As of 2.3.14 there is not such tooltip. DIsplay of tooltips is enabled
> > in preferences.
>
> There is. I just checked once more (and I had already checked
> yesterday).
What I was trying to tell you is that that message exists, but doesn't
show up. Which means
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 13:13 +0200, Aurimas Juška wrote:
> It actually uses GtkDrawingArea. This is related to zoom & cropping
> functionality. If we dropped cropping, one of Gimp widgets could be
> used.
I don't see why you couldn't implement cropping with one of the
GimpPreview widgets.
>
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 02:36 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> As of 2.3.14 there is not such tooltip. DIsplay of tooltips is enabled
> in preferences.
There is. I just checked once more (and I had already checked
yesterday).
Sven
___
Gimp-de
On 2/7/07, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 05:39 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>
> > While we are discussing it, is it possible to add a remark to the
> > current dialog that enabling preview also calculates size of resulted
> > file? I already heard several times from new
On 2/7/07, gg wrote:
> I should probably have chosen a more precise and less emotive term than
> lame. In chosing "save for the web" the use indicates he does not know
> what is involved and is expecting gimp to magically do it for him, not
> unreasonably since the program is offering that as an o
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:32:04 +0100, Thorsten Wilms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 01:58:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Despite the idiot-user title of this feature (copied for PS it seems)
>
> ...
>
>> If the user is so lame that they are going to click on a featur
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 01:58:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Despite the idiot-user title of this feature (copied for PS it seems)
...
> If the user is so lame that they are going to click on a feature called
> "save for the web"
If a user wants to save images for use on the web,
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:16:33 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 20:03:59, peter sikking wrote:
>
>> - that in-dialog cropping looks like a very uncomfortable way
>>to do that to me;
>> - simply display the Size in the fields that are now called
>>Resize now w
Hi,
On 2/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 20:03:59, peter sikking wrote:
>
> > - that in-dialog cropping looks like a very uncomfortable way
> >to do that to me;
> > - simply display the Size in the fields that are now called
> >Resize now
Hi,
On 2/6/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> BTW, does this plug-in use GimpPreview widgets? I would like to get some
> feedback on features and API of GimpPreview and its derivatives.
>
It actually uses GtkDrawingArea. This is related to zoom & cropping
functionality. If we dropped
On Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 20:03:59, peter sikking wrote:
> - that in-dialog cropping looks like a very uncomfortable way
>to do that to me;
> - simply display the Size in the fields that are now called
>Resize now without the open/close triangle, and remove the
>other size display;
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 05:39 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> While we are discussing it, is it possible to add a remark to the
> current dialog that enabling preview also calculates size of resulted
> file? I already heard several times from new users that GIMP doesn't
> calculate resulte
On 2/6/07, peter sikking wrote:
> So I think, right now, that the all the image area should be used
> to preview the jpg, with a Preview checkbox, for the users like
> Thorsten who want to do original/jpg comparisons.
While we are discussing it, is it possible to add a remark to the
current dialo
Aurimas wrote:
> I've worked on a similar plug-in. It would be very interesting to hear
> some comments on it as I am planning to improve it. Here is a short
> introduction: http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/6571/
> saveforwebid4.jpg
> Peter, could you tell if it fits in save for web scenarios a
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 05:01:33PM +0200, Aurimas Ju?ka wrote:
> I've worked on a similar plug-in. It would be very interesting to hear
> some comments on it as I am planning to improve it. Here is a short
> introduction: http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/6571/saveforwebid4.jpg
> Peter, could you
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:01 +0200, Aurimas Juška wrote:
> I've worked on a similar plug-in. It would be very interesting to hear
> some comments on it as I am planning to improve it. Here is a short
> introduction: http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/6571/saveforwebid4.jpg
> Peter, could you t
On 2/3/07, peter sikking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> > BTW, some apps have web export dialogs with side by side
> > panes original/compressed. I found toggling between
> > original/preview in the same view to be superior if
> > you want to spot JPG artifacts. It's important
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 21:01 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Yeah it can go. It would only make sense if a Cancel on
> > the jpeg options would get you back to the Save_Image dialog,
> > in case you see that the jpeg compression is not appropriate,
> > you change your mind and go back for png o
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 14:02 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
> Thorsten Wilms wrote:
>
> > I think the Save_Image dialog should just disappear
> > after use, as both Cancel and Help are available on
> > the second dialog and what else would it be good for?
>
> Yeah it can go. It would only make s
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 11:28 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote:
> Me too. The new setup where the preview is a layer in the image
> dialog (I just updated and saw it) is wonderful. I'd been struggling
> with focus/raise issues with the old separate-window setup (click on
> the dialog and it would raise
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 12:48 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> I think the Save_Image dialog should just disappear
> after use, as both Cancel and Help are available on
> the second dialog and what else would it be good for?
If I remember correctly, it used to serve as a place to show the
prog
Thorsten Wilms writes:
> I found toggling between
> original/preview in the same view to be superior if
> you want to spot JPG artifacts.
Me too. The new setup where the preview is a layer in the image
dialog (I just updated and saw it) is wonderful. I'd been struggling
with focus/raise issues
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
>> If we try to do an all in one, then the result has to
>> look and feel like a dialog, not like a main window,
>> because of the modal nature (finish this first) of the task.
>
> But this would not be like your common dialog that disappears
> after Cancel/OK, but rather a w
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 02:02:58PM +0100, peter sikking wrote:
> Thorsten Wilms wrote:
>
> > I think the Save_Image dialog should just disappear
> > after use, as both Cancel and Help are available on
> > the second dialog and what else would it be good for?
>
> Yeah it can go. It would only make
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 01:13:56PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Saturday, February 3, 2007, 12:48:54, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
>
> > Then the Save_as_JPEG controls could appear on the image
> > window (inspired by the Firefox find bar) to further cut
> > down on window juggling.
>
> Only a
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> I think the Save_Image dialog should just disappear
> after use, as both Cancel and Help are available on
> the second dialog and what else would it be good for?
Yeah it can go. It would only make sense if a Cancel on
the jpeg options would get you back to the Save_Image d
On Saturday, February 3, 2007, 12:48:54, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> Then the Save_as_JPEG controls could appear on the image
> window (inspired by the Firefox find bar) to further cut
> down on window juggling.
Only as an option - some of us have multiple displays, and use the advanced
options reg
Hi!
Whenever I save an image as JPG, I have to move both the
Save_Image and the Save_as_JPEG dialog out of the way
to check the preview.
I think the Save_Image dialog should just disappear
after use, as both Cancel and Help are available on
the second dialog and what else would it be good for
30 matches
Mail list logo
