@Harry,
Sent a screengrab to your gmail account.
John
On Oct 5, 7:05 am, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/10/4 JPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com
Darktable looks cool.
Unfortunately the precompiled version doesn't include some
prerequisite libraries though. Sadly, I don't think
What do I use to view/display/convert my images etc.? I imagine this
is pretty basic. Perhaps I don't know the proper term for what I need?
As a Mac user, I'm interested in HTML/CSS/java, QTVR, or the like. Not
really interested in Flash.
I mostly do partial cylindrical panoramas so I'm usually
Thanks everyone for the responses. Further thoughts and informations
will also be appreciated. :-)
On Nov 2, 1:48 am, Thomas Pryds tho...@pryds.eu wrote:
I'm not a Mac user, but I find that the website atwww.360cities.netdoes a
good job in letting you view your panorama properly. Just upload
Thanks for the links. I'll check them out.
As I can't even claim myself capable of compiling source files on my
own, I doubt I can use any but either the most simple, or the the most
mature and user friendly (like Hugin) OSS solutions.
On Nov 2, 5:11 pm, Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola)
If I don't misunderstand your post . . .
Yes, one wants a level horizon, but the horizon is an imaginary line
and is only evident in certain perfect situations without obstructions
(flat desert, seascape, etc.) In most natural situations like
landscapes, the viewer's senses are not greatly
Well that's one of those easy situations.
When you can see the horizon clearly like that, horizontal CPs
distributed about the pano on the horizon should give you great
results. Contrary to how one might casually think, placing them far
apart (with very wide angle images) produces diminishing
BTW my sig would have to be more like
Unix doesn't dictate how I work, it dictates how I don't work (but
only when I consciously try to use it.)
;-) I love that it's there, but I like having that Aqua interface
softening the ride!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Thanks for the info Harry.
BTW, As I read these forums I've intensified my desire to be fair,
honest, appreciative and not overly casual when speaking about
panorama software. I've come to notice that most of the the people
around here have had some hand in making it!
Thanks to Thomas for his
, 3 Nov 2011 07:06:01 -0700 (PDT), JohnPW wrote:
Well that's one of those easy situations.
When you can see the horizon clearly like that, horizontal CPs
distributed about the pano on the horizon should give you great
results. Contrary to how one might casually think, placing them far
So how do folks do their hand adjustments? . . .
[I guess I should start a new topic for this.]
On Nov 3, 12:47 pm, Robert Krawitz r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
I had the same problem on the Pilgrim monument. There are only four
spots, at the center of each side, where there's a clear view without
In an earlier post Robert Krawitz was sharing some nice panoramas he
did:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=Dq=http://rlk.smugmug.com/Other/Landscapes/4851912_XB4SmT/1488875261_xzmusg=AFQjCNEGlfZgOM7TUL0A2Cykj4HW1NPBnw
and
.)
Are alpha channels the way to go making the blends and masks?
Is there some other better way?
tricks tips etc.
Thanks
--John
On Nov 4, 3:40 am, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 4 Nov., 06:07, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
I have some images I recently took handheld on a small yacht
, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
I have some images I recently took handheld on a small yacht sailing
in San Francisco Bay. I had to put all the control points on
stationary parts of the boat since anything else was in constant
motion. It has made me want to do more hand blending
I suppose the first thing I should do is get a pano head so I have
less work to do in the first place. But I tend to mostly do handheld.
Because most of my images have been only partial panoramas in the
past, this wasn't such a concern for me until recently.
Anyway, as I was saying, I'm most
I do need to try it.
I only just relaized I could set the cropping in Hugin far beyond the
image edges, even to 180x360, which is probably why I might sound
pretty ignorant about this. :-)
On Nov 4, 10:59 am, Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola)
cartol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
in fact I
On Nov 4, 5:11 pm, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
The primary tool is the Mask tab in Hugin. You can render layers
and try and blend them in an image editor but this is painful.
Although I was super excited when a Masking feature was added to
Hugin, I felt the interface was somewhat
4, 5:42 pm, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 4, 5:11 pm, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
The primary tool is the Mask tab in Hugin. You can render layers
and try and blend them in an image editor but this is painful.
Although I was super excited when a Masking feature
They work for me too. The mask interface is very well thought out int
terms of indicating how it effects overlapping areas in the other
layers. My only gripe is that i wish the mask drawing tool were more
usable. The cursor and outline seem overly large for the task, you
cant zoom while drawing
Carvalho (Cartola)http://cartola.org/360
2011/11/5 JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com
I should probably clarify this as now I look at it, it doesn't convey
what I really wanted it too.
First, the masking feature is great and I was quite happy to see it
added. It works very well and I
for the zooming feature (which is an element to
control how the image is displayed) would be directly below or on top
of the image. See attached suggestion.
BTW the panorama shown in the screenshot is on 360cities:
http://360cities.net/image/autumn-colors-at-grosser-ahornboden
JohnPW schrieb
Well I have gone back and tried it and looked over the documentation
pretty carefully. Indeed these features do not work on the Mac version
(as far as I can tell.)
Originally, if I remember correctly, Apple developed the command/
Apple key only for GUI related functions, preserving the meaning of
Interesting idea, karmadillo.
On Nov 7, 5:32 pm, Karmadillo directrix.digi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 4, 3:07 pm, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote: In an earlier post
Robert Krawitz was sharing some nice panoramas he
did:http://www.google.com/url?sa=Dq=http://rlk.smugmug.com/Other/Landsca
of the left and giving
them some spacial or hierarchical separation would be a good solution
for all.
It's the perennial issue of balance—the natural human desire for, and
love of consistency against the truth that a foolish consistency is
the hobgoblin of little minds. :-)
On Nov 7, 4:42 pm, JohnPW
Thanks Bruno,
Knowing about the ability to zoom in the mask tab makes many things
better (I hope the mask editing features can be worked out for the Mac
version soon.)
In light of people's suggestions I have done some reading of the
documentation and experimentation. But I think I'm missing some
I suppose the hard part is discerning foolish consistency from
desirable consistency. :-)
On Nov 7, 6:59 pm, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
It's the perennial issue of balance—the natural human desire for, and
love of consistency against the truth that a foolish consistency
On Nov 8, 3:25 am, Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com wrote:
IIRC, the Control, Alt and Option keys were all grafted on top of the
Apple key - the Apple key was The Apple Way. Having more than one
modifier key was considered too confusing for Apple's idea of a user.
I don't think so.
But
On Nov 8, 3:31 am, Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com wrote:
I do wish there were stronger tools for manipulating masks: rotate,
flip, scale up/down, split, combine,
snap points of one mask to points of another mask.
This is one I've thought would be particularly handy.
--
You received this
On Nov 8, 3:41 am, Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com wrote:
In that sense, I don't think the present Hugin UI is either foolish or
rabid. ;-)
Definitely not. This is not a big deal, just a tweak. Some odd
critters end up in every project to some extent so all projects
benefit from the occasional
OK.
That looks so much better than I would have guessed (and is an easier
technique than I was imagining.)
On Nov 8, 3:46 pm, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Mon 07-Nov-2011 at 17:31 -0800, JohnPW wrote:
. . . I prefer to use a photo multiple times in a Hugin project
Carl,
I guess when I try to repair trouble I made in one post I just create
more ;-)
--John
computer user since 1973
satisfied Apple user since 1978
satisfied Mac user since 1984
On Nov 8, 12:50 pm, Carl von Einem c...@einem.net wrote:
JohnPW schrieb am 08.11.11 18:07:
On Nov 8, 3:25 am
Exactly my thought Frederic.
Thanks Bruno.
On Nov 8, 4:00 pm, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/11/8 Bruno Postle br...@postle.net
Don't complain about the lack of tutorial, you just made one :-)
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et
Cool. Thanks Carlos.
I enjoyed the panoramas but had some difficulty with the videos (I
have a crappy bandwidth.)
Is the 2012 conference locations selected yet?
Just curious.
--John
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic
This [erect2cubic] looks like something I was seeking in this post:
So [n]ow that I've used Hugin to make my panorama . . .
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/60765f882c51ce5a
How would you suggest one get started with learning to use scripts?
It seems like quite a
Well, I suppose it occurs to me because I'm not familiar with exactly
how enblend goes about it's work.
In the absence of confirmed knowledge, humans tend to create mental
models of how things work. :-)
On Nov 9, 12:07 pm, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Tue 08-Nov-2011 at 20:03 -1000,
the zoom menu). I have no problems
with the size of the cursor or mask.
Try ctrl left and right mouse clicking to add and remove points to a
mask. The Help has a more comprehensive desription.
Cheers,
Daniel.
On Nov 5, 7:41 am, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
They work for me
At the risk of sounding like a moron (as I usually do) I'll respond.
I've only recently experimented with this myself. But my initial
thought is, Do you want a mosaic or a pano?
Actually, it really sounds like you might want a linear pano rather
than a mosaic. Or possibly a series of partial panos
I would tend to think focus bracketing should be done first (but I
offer this from theory and gut instinct rather than actual
experience :-) ! ) On the other hand, since the focus bracketing is
only in two (presumably smaller) areas maybe my gut doesn't think it's
as theoretically urgent to do the
, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
At the risk of sounding like a moron (as I usually do) I'll respond.
No you are not.
I've only recently experimented with this myself. But my initial
thought is, Do you want a mosaic or a pano?
Actually, it really sounds like you might want a linear
Syv,
I emailed you a pdf example (not sure how to attach files in the list,
although I have seen that others have done it.)
I don't know how helpful it is, but perhaps it will give you an idea
of what to expect with even very casual hand held shots.
--
You received this message because you are
Nice!
I knew it was possible. Good point on the manual editing of control
points. I meant to mention that too.
It looks like on a slant one might want some downward shots at the
high end and some upward shots at the low end (if one is seeking to
make a conventional crop.) Obviously this has it's
17, 10:10 am, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/11/17 JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com
It's not a real big deal, but could one of you Hugin Mac users out
there confirm this bug so I don't have to keep thinking I'm
crazy? :-) As I said it's not a horrible bug
? It seems very
possible to me.
--John
On Nov 17, 1:00 pm, Robert Krawitz r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:29:23 -0800 (PST), kfj wrote:
On 16 Nov., 09:25, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
Ha! Just as I expected someone with a good knowledge of the subject
has responded as I
On Nov 17, 4:13 pm, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 17 Nov., 21:14, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
What is needed is probably more like a photo finish
camera:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photo_finish
Which looks to be very similar tho the line camera Kay has described
(pretty
Not sure what you are asking but if I understand what you're thinking,
this may help:
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/39e8e289427f9415/b2f8f459e9c0f808?lnk=gstq=gores#
On Nov 18, 1:52 pm, Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm looking for planer to curved from
a quickie test to see if the technique could be
applied to shooting panomurals (as I’ve termed them).
On 18 November 2011 06:34, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 18 Nov., 00:13, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 17, 4:13 pm, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
This is why we now try
I'm thinking this might be a problem of use/understanding/interface
metaphone. Hugin harnesses some very powerful and complex tools and
leaves a lot of room for user choices and modification so as to be
most flexible for any need. Because of this it can be rather hard to
learn to use (it gives you
2011 07:28, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
That's pretty fun.
Notice how it tried to resolve the parallax problems. It locked onto
the front surface of the the building pretty well, but had a hard time
with distant objects enclosed by the building. The objects seen
through the open
this is interesting. It's also helpful to mess around with the target
image and see how the various perspectives and features work. I made a
target image as you described. I'm not too familiar with GIMP but It
seemed to work out nicely.
If anyone can tell me how to post an image on here, I'd be
Please clarify this for me as I want to make sure I understand (and it
may be helpful to other newer Panorama makers like myself.)
These are my assumptions:
1.) Only the actual horizon should be assigned as a horizontal
line (unless you just want some line, or the average of some lines,
to be
The Apple UFO Campus Building exception. ;-)
On Nov 21, 5:43 pm, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
. . . What about equirectangular or cylindrical (or Mercator)?
In these projections the only features in the scene that will be
horizontal in the output image are: the horizon at sea, or
Jan said it short and sweet!
Think of the GL preview as a rough but fast preview with lots of
features, and the regular preview as a slower more accurate preview.
In the GL preview you can drag images around, crop the pano, visually
see any out of whack control points, check the coverage on the
Actually There are cases where it is a goal to make the blending seam
pass through a particular area.
In my case the it's where the passengess on the boat are gripping the
rails (or the mast stay.) It's the only place that is fairly static.
But I have found your cropping advice very helpful. The
Cool! I look forward to using it.
Thanks, all.
--John
On Nov 22, 12:03 pm, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi mac users,
Another new bundle
This bundle fixes the mask error as described
inhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/887406
Thanks to Thomas Modes (once again).
To
Hi Harry,
This is an improvement. Still having some intermittent problems though
with wandering masks and adding/deleting mask points. I also think
(once the mask and point editing problems get completely ferreted out)
that it would be helpful it Hugin would remember the mask window
states
in the direction of right to
left, with the camera held portrait.
On 21 November 2011 21:16, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
That's interesting. It looks like it uses the camera's orientations
sensor to select the angle of the strip of image it captures. As you
turn the camera the strips
This sounds interesting.
Am I correct in thinking that HSI is not functional on the Mac
platform?
--John
On Nov 26, 10:52 am, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 26 Nov., 16:28, Tom Sharpless tksharpl...@gmail.com wrote:
Given that Hugin now does Python, it is natural to extend some of the
core
I have to admit I've never tried that myself. I always export a
version or master to a folder labeled 8bit. Then I repeat the same
export to a folder named 16bit. Then I create a Hugin.pto and all
are in a folder named after the pano. This way the whole project is
self contained and portable. It
://www.flickr.com/photos/johnpwatkins/sets/72157628238521079/
On Nov 21, 3:22 pm, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
this is interesting. It's also helpful to mess around with the target
image and see how the various perspectives and features work. I made a
target image as you described. I'm not too
You will find this tread useful.
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/39e8e289427f9415/b2f8f459e9c0f808?lnk=gstq=gores#b2f8f459e9c0f808
It got me exited about using templates and now I use them all the time
for 16bit images and a number of other things.
The last post by
Thanks. As I've said before, I'm better with pictures than text! ;-)
On Dec 1, 4:34 pm, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 1 Dez., 22:54, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
Even though nobody asked :-) I'm posting a link to the target I made
following Kay's description. It probably isn't
On Dec 1, 4:34 pm, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
It's fun mixing in artificial images!
Kay
That's an interesting idea. One could turn a painting or an artificial
landscape (CAD drawing, child's drawing, etc.) into an interactive
panorama.
What have you tried?
--
You received this message because
Interesting idea.
I made a panorama from the Mt Baldy Colorado images. Unfortunately he
hasn't made one for Mt. Evans CO, which is probably one of the the
most visited high peaks in the US (and one which I made a panorama
from.)
On Dec 2, 11:30 am, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 2 Dez., 16:27, kfj
Reading the reviews, it looks like it may not work very well.
On Dec 3, 5:26 pm, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
In looking for a similar website that covers north America, I came
across this:http://panoramascope.com/index.html
Looked pretty interesting to me.
Has anyone been able
Yup.
Calibration makes up for any *stationary* interfering objects which is
why you can have a very accurate fixed compass on a ship or vehicle.
So the limitation Geoff points out is mostly a result of the sensor.
However, all the tripod and parts of the head are not stationary
relative to the
Nice Job, Matthew. And thanks.
It seems to work fine on my Intel C2D MacBook Pro running Safari on
10.7.4.
No go on my iPod touch though as (surprising to me) Safari on iOS does
not support WebGL (I guess it's still fairly beta on Safari though.)
It would be nice to be able to use the cursor
Is this the best place to go to get up to speed on the current GUI
Redesign: ?
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/hugin/+spec/ui-overhaul
Is there a user case, development plan, or other kinds of documents I
can review to understand the goals, intentions, and planning of this
redesign? I'm asking
Judging from the resounding silence, I'm guessing my post must be seen
as somewhat offensive, ignorant, presumptuous, or the like (or
possibly the ones who can answer are to tired to respond.) Sorry if
any or all of those are true. I really appreciate the work that has
been done on Hugin and know
Seems to be a problem with the show extent of active masks and crop
area option in the mask(/crop) tab.
When the option is checked some of the screens are fully dimmed (as if
the whole image has been masked out or cropped.)
(I have screen shots, but see no way to attach them on this web site.)
--
PS: I'm using 2011.5.0.5833:db2f378e1c08 built by Harry van der Wolf
On Jun 12, 1:33 pm, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems to be a problem with the show extent of active masks and crop
area option in the mask(/crop) tab.
When the option is checked some of the screens are fully dimmed
And how does one close the Overview window in the Fast preview
window? (I like the feature, but don't know how to close it.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is
To reattach the overview window after unpinning it, drag the overview
window bar to any edge (the cursor on the edge, not the window itself)
and hold for a second.
To dismiss the window altogether, view-overview (as when opening it.)
On Jun 12, 1:56 pm, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote
Thanks Harry and Bruno,
I'm glad I didn't cause offense (and don't worry, I took no offense at the
initial silence.) I appreciate your explanations and will continue to
provide what feedback I can. I'll also go back and make sure I've read all
that I can on this and not missed any past
I couldn't follow what Jose was really trying to do (or why! People find so
many uses for Hugin.)
But I did understand one image was a screenshot and therefore undistorted
(as Jose alluded to) and therefor just set ypr at 0,0,0. I added a few more
control points and then optimized. It looks
The GUI overhaul is interesting, but the binaries I've used on the Mac are
definitely not ready for prime time. Only the 5.0.5723 version (compiled by
Harry, as I have had no luck compiling on my own) has even worked for me.
Later versions don't even save control points, image position
Wow. Quite a big project. And very nice images.
Nice work.
John
Thanks!
It's a labor of love but sometimes overwhelming (world record?)
I've been documenting an old power station that 's subject of an ongoing
industrial preservation effort combined with a leisure / entertainment
facility
I think you will want to use a rectilinear projection. You are making a
linear panorama which is really more like a scan than a mosaic.
This tutorial may be helpful as it is most like what you are trying to do
and it extends on the scanned images tutorial Carlos suggested:
Good to see the new Hugin 2012 Beta. Thanks, Harry.
I have had a problem with the last several Beta versions (binaries) and
thought it was just a Beta thing. Perhaps something is amiss with my
installation? Soemthing with the batcher? Some preference somewhere? I
don't know.
Anyway, whenever
Thanks for the response Harry.
On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:56:12 AM UTC-5, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
2012/8/2 JohnPW
Could the fact that I have more than one version of Hugin installed be
the cause of this problem?
I don't think this is a probable cause but you never know. I have
not have the parallel
jobs option checked. So now things are running smoothly.
Thanks again,
John
On Saturday, August 4, 2012 5:38:06 AM UTC-5, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:56:12 AM UTC-5, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
2012/8/2 JohnPW
Could the fact that I have more
That's pretty cool. Thanks.
On Friday, August 3, 2012 5:01:46 AM UTC-5, kfj wrote:
Deuschle's site is indeed excellent, and I've been using it for my
'canonical' panoramas from mountaintops, where I set something like a dozen
CPs between real images and the artificial panorama (which I
I'm curious.
Does anyone know what PanoTools-like software NASA uses to process the
image data they get back from the Mars rover?
Any PanoTools/Hugin connections?
[Link to JPL NASA page] http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA16051
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
It looks like they have minimal overlap (and little or no blending.) I
suppose their mast camera is quite stable and well calibrated and
understood, so they can take mosaic images with minimal overlap, which
would save on bandwidth (I assume that's a factor.) I believe I read that
Mars is
Alex,
Nice.
According to the DPReview link that IKT posted the camera is 34mm (115
equivalent) which should allow you to get the FOV and the crop factor if
you want.
Thanks IKT
On Monday, August 13, 2012 2:22:19 PM UTC-5, Alex Romosan wrote:
i don't speak for nasa or jpl, but i grabbed their
Thanks for that link.
I figured they may well have been pioneers in this area, since they tend to
have lots of valuable visual data, lots of time to plan and process, lots
of technical expertise, lots of money to throw at the problem, and have
probably been working on it for 50 or 60 years.
On
So no intelligent life then?
Bummer.
;-) - NM is a nice place.
On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 1:48:04 PM UTC-5, Chris Dennis wrote:
On 14/08/12 19:44, Thomas Pryds wrote:
On the same topic, see
http://360cities.net/image/curiosity-rover-martian-solar-day-2
Ha! Capricorn One was
OK,
So like Alex I grabbed images from the JPL website and put them into Hugin
(my first really large pano — Now I see where some of the techniques I've
read about come into play. Anywy I got this strange banding along the tile
edges—almost like the vignetting was not removed (except its worse
I imagine this is nothing new to most of you but for a person who had never
seen it before, It was baffling for a while. So I'm posting this because it
took me a while to figure it out, I didn't see anything referring to this
in the Hugin forums, manual or website, and it might be nice for
So was my post super obvious for people? At all interesting or helpful to
anyone?
Just curious.
This is the sort of basic thing I'd like to see addressed a bit in the
manuals or on the Wiki.
Perhaps it already is. I'm always amazed when I discover new resources I
hadn't noticed before, buried
I've been messing around with tying to use some of the HuginTools on my
Mac. does anyone know of a link to information on doing this?
I have seen this:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Panorama_scripting_in_a_nutshell
and it is interesting. But I need some more basic information. (Like the
basics on
Nice Erik. Thanks.
I like very explicit tutorials on doing specific things. Many of the
resources assume more basic knowledge than I possess (details about Hugin,
PanoTools, or even just OS or command line details) making them very
intriguing, but not necessarily easy to use.
Thanks,
John
On
Hi Harry,
Thanks for the response. (It's partially your move away from OS X that has
stimulated me to learn more about this stuff. I figure that in the future,
among other things, I might actually have to compile my own Hugin Mac
binaries!)
When you say,
So if you want to use tca_correct for
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 4:28:14 PM UTC-5, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
The binaries in the HuginTools folder are actually symlinks to the
binaries inside the Hugin.app.
I assume this refers to the files in the Hugin app package? (a symlink is
akin to an alias pointing to the binary
OK,
I think I figured it out. I hope I haven't broken anything.
I changed this:
[There was a bunch of very similar stuff above this . . . ]
##
# Your previous /Users/jpwmacbookpro/.profile file was backed up as
/Users/jpwmacbookpro/.profile.macports-saved_2012-08-12_at_18:57:16
##
# MacPorts
to row. And this is before I cropped out the top two
rows of
black pixels.
How much better did it get when you cropped out the black pixels?
Jim
On 2012-08-22 3:43 PM, JohnPW wrote:
So was my post super obvious for people? At all interesting or helpful
to anyone?
Just curious
Ah.
This one was still too big and got down sampled by Google. It looks like
it's about about 1/4 original resolution now.
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 8:23:38 PM UTC-5, JohnPW wrote:
It turned out pretty nice, although it is huge. here's a detail:
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com
Thanks,
That's helpful and good to know.
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 12:23:42 PM UTC-5, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
Hi,
Yes, that's correct. It could be slightly simpler but macports quite
forcefully adds it's path before the rest. That's not a problem at all,
just a remark (every mac with
I'm ignorant of scripting, but it seems to me that only certain parts of
this project can be easily automated.
I suggest for a shot like this (never tried one, but I have thought about
it a good bit :-) ) that you take initial shots that cover the area of the
action completely. These can then
, 2012 4:15:08 PM UTC-5, Bruno Postle wrote:
On Thu 23-Aug-2012 at 13:44 -0700, JohnPW wrote:
So I am curious. You said you don't do command line stuff with Hugin
anymore and I wondered if you would expand on that. Is it not worthwhile?
Ultimately, Hugin is a pointy-clicky visual way
Thanks Harry.
On Friday, August 24, 2012 11:53:14 AM UTC-5, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
2012/8/23 JohnPW johnpw...@gmail.com javascript:
So I am curious. You said you don't do command line stuff with Hugin
anymore and I wondered if you would expand on that. Is it not worthwhile?
Do you
run it's course, these are the numbers I got:
degrees of veiew = 14.82454 focal length = 34.76441 crop
factor = 3.3823 b = -0.00323
John
On Saturday, August 25, 2012 12:26:43 AM UTC-5, Thomas Pryds wrote:
2012/8/25 JohnPW johnpw...@gmail.com javascript
1 - 100 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
