Why do you fear Logr records will be lost?
If you specify AUTODELETE(NO) and RETPD(0), Logr will delete records as CICS
indicates, not by its own decisions.
If you want to backup your logstream data, I wonder what you can do with the
backups.
Kees.
McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
I'm applying a PSP for a new machine (z890-460). In documentation I found
many times references to 'Driver 55K'. As I'm not a z/OS sysprog, can
anyone explain me what it is ? A piece of HW ?
Thank in advance
Max Scarpa
DB2 sysprog
This is the level of the microcode for the machine.
Ask your IBM tech if you already have it installed, and if not ask him to
install it.
Gadu
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max
Scarpa
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/pso/cftable.html
You should really get off your fingers and use Google.
I'm applying a PSP for a new machine (z890-460). In documentation I found
many times references to 'Driver 55K'. As I'm not a z/OS sysprog, can
anyone explain me what it is
Been awake since 05:40 actually, never heard of someone in our business
without web access. Must be a heavy outfit you are with.
End sssn
Thank you for your replies.
snip
You should really get off your fingers and use Google.
end snip
If I had an access to web
Is it possible that the CIP routers that are configured as SCTCs/RS6K are
not running CSNA? IP will will work with either one and we are trying to
figure out if we need to change our HCD for a DR on Z990s. We have been
having problems at DR testing with CSNA and CIP microcode is at 28-18.
Thanks
Hi folks
Our developers are getting IGYPS0157-E and IGYPS0158E messages when they try
and compile a CICS COBOL program on z/OS 1.4 in Enterprise Cobol of z/OS and
OS/390 V3.2.
I can't find these blasted messages documented anywhere!! Is there some
convoluted format for decoding them?
I
look here:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21163906
-Original Message-
From: Perryman, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 7:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Another OS/390 to z/OS 1.4 migration question (COBOL)
Hi folks
Our developers
Brian,
It has to do with the CICS Translator option you
Are using, not COBOL option. I think the correct option is now
COBOL3, but my mind is a little rusty on the topic.
Dave
Dave Jousma
Principle Systems Programmer
Fifth Third Bank
Thanks Dave, I'll probably try that too!
-
This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may
contain confidential and privileged information of Transaction NetworkServices.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution isprohibited. If you
are not the
In ISPF (PDF), enter option 7.3 (Dialog Test and Variables) and
look for ZOS390RL variable. It contains your level of operating
system.
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
Banco Bradesco S/A
4254/DPCD/Alphaville
Suporte Técnico - Software Básico Mainframes
Tel:55
...
I'm applying a PSP for a new machine (z890-460). In documentation I found
many times references to 'Driver 55K'. As I'm not a z/OS sysprog, can
anyone explain me what it is ? A piece of HW ?
...
It's the level of the code in the HMC.
They have to be at specified levels to support new(er)
Hi,
Make sure that the SRVCLASS of ICSF is set to SYSSTC or something
high. We had a problem that caused an outage because the performance
and tuning group set the task's SRVCLASS below our onlines' SRVCLASS.
This was fine until CPU reached 100% and ICSF stopped getting
dispatched. This
On 6/21/2005 5:29 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
Not to mention the other language copy members there (IEANTC, IEANTPAS,
IEANTPLI).
BTW, the C language sample in SYS1.SAMPLIB(IEANTC) has an error in the
#pragma's for the 64-bit IEANT functions:
They are each declared as
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/21/2005
at 08:23 PM, Tony Babonas [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Not true,
The fact that you lucked out doesn't mean that it's safe to inhale the
stuff. An EDS employee had to be treated after going back[1] into the
computer room to turn off the system.
[1] On his own
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 06/22/2005
at 11:41 AM, Shane Ginnane [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I can only own up to being in 2. In neither case was I affected by
the gas - I was out the door as soon as I heard it drop.
*VERY* good incentive to get moving.
Shane
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Thanks, Walt. I'll try that route.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Walt Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 8:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Name/Token Services in COBOL?
Snipped
Members of SYS1.SAMPLIB are (in my experience) generally
Yes, you can pay IBM $5,000 to $10,000 dollars to make it an R16, R26,
etc.
-Original Message-
Hi Listers,
We have an IBM 9672-R56 hardware. Is there any way we can downsize it
to a lower capacity so that we can use it for testing.
We understand that IBM has dropped marketing
In a message dated 6/22/2005 7:23:43 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Only certain drives. The S/360 DASD and the original S/370 DASD did
not have skip displacement, although they did have alternate tracks.
IIRC, the 3330 was the first DASD that had skip
I am not sure if it would be worth it, but you could contact a third party
vendor and see if you could trade down. Instead of paying money. you might
be able to get paid for the downgrade. However, since you could probably
buy an R16 or R26 for $ 5,000, the net difference may not pay for the
In a message dated 6/22/2005 7:24:23 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not true, I've been in 3 HALON dumps back in the days it was THE
method for computer room FS. One must exit quickly as it will make
you short of breath at high enough concentrations since it
If you didn't upgrade your COBOL as well as z/OS, then I would be REALLY
surprised in this change occurring. The COBOL documentation talks about the
change from NODBCS to DBCS as the default compiler option - in newer
releases of Enterprise COBOL. There should ALSO be a change from FLAG(I) to
Rolf,
Sorry for the delayed reply, but I did not see your message until I browsed
the newsgroup today. I normally only read from the mailing list.
That's an interesting hack, thanks for the info. It never hurts to have
another tool in your back pocket for when it is needed.
Peter
--
At that price it would make more sense to do it yourself! How on earth do
IBM arrive at that figure? Or you could buy a used R16 etc. for less money -
try ebay!
Mike
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:44:47 -0400, Larry Kraus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, you can pay IBM $5,000 to $10,000 dollars to make
What the name of manual that contain information for stand-alone dump for
z/OS 1.4?
Jason Lowe - Mainframe Systems - Cornell Information Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(607) 255-7851
The Supreme Court has surrendered.
It has destroyed the Civil Rights Bill, and converted the Republican
I remnember Texas Tech getting a speed upgrade to there 370/145 back
in the 70's. It consisted of the CE removing three loops from the 145's
microcode. The price tag for this upgrade? A cool $ 50K!
Michael Ross wrote:
At that price it would make more sense to do it yourself! How on earth
Jason,
If you mean the basics -
z/OS V1R4.0 MVS Diagnosis: Tools and Service Aids
Otherwise, you could use the online bookmgr z/OS 1.4 bookshelf and search
for what you are looking for:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/Shelves/IEA2BK34
Lizette Koehler
--- Snip
What
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:04:24 -0400, Martin, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
Let's say I have a Global zone with products A and B.
During the install of a new version for product B, I decide to create a
new Global CSI (for product B).
How can I update this new Global CSI with the
For vendors there has been a viable alternative to CVTUSER or RYO techniques
for a while now. IBM can assign a slot in the vendor nee customer CVT table
anchored from the ECVT.
ECVTCTBL DCV(CSRCTABL) Customer anchor table.
* Slots assigned by
Hi,
The following sentences include 2nd level,but I don't know what it is.
---
login to system:
IF running on 2nd level:
Login as xxx
NOTE: When first IPL-ed, you need to change the password.
So for password, enter: aaa
and then change it to: bbb
IF
...
However, since you could probably
buy an R16 or R26 for $ 5,000, the net difference may not pay for the
shipping and CE services for the install
...
The net software difference may.
But, I recall one ISV (from Islandia NY)
Who would not refund any money.
Just gave out credits, which were
Bill Klein wrote:
If you didn't upgrade your COBOL as well as z/OS, then I would be REALLY
surprised in this change occurring. The COBOL documentation talks about the
change from NODBCS to DBCS as the default compiler option - in newer
releases of Enterprise COBOL. There should ALSO be a
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:35:14 -0500, SArnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remnember Texas Tech getting a speed upgrade to there 370/145 back
in the 70's. It consisted of the CE removing three loops from the 145's
microcode. The price tag for this upgrade? A cool $ 50K!
Pretty extortionate... I'm
Cobol decided that its internal messages were SO wonderful that
they no longer needed a messages manual. Yes, really. I found this by
opening a PMR with IBM.
You can run the following program (Cobol 3.3) :
//RUNIVP EXEC IGYWCLG,PARM.COBOL=RENT,REGION=0M,
//
Yeah, but unfortunately all this does is give a dump of the messages. No
further information beyond what you get when the message happens for real.
Some of those messages don't make a whole lot of sense - even if they're
supposed to be written so well they don't need further explanation.
In many cases it's not a description of the message that's needed, it's what
caused it and what your subsequent options for fixing it are that's needed.
I can see that most of the messages from a compiler would indeed be
self-documenting and quite rightly so, particularly since the reader is
Both Halon (which was bad for the Ozone layer) and a more
environmentally friendly replacement 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoro-propane
(manufactured under names such as HFC-227ea, FM-200, FE-227) have a
minimum concentration at which they will suppress fires, and a higher
concentration at which they
SMP BUILDMCS??
Martin, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
06/22/2005 09:04
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
SMPE - copying products to new Global Zone
Hi all,
Let's
Ron - Thank you for your follow up. I thought that Skip was making a
point about the importance of the role of the application. If not, then
I must respectfully *disagree* with Skip.
I am concerned that many still cling to the misperception that a 'fuzzy'
copy is acceptable as is. As you very
They are each declared as linkage(...,OS64_NOSTACK), but OS64_NOSTACK is
not a supported option of #pragma linkage in the IBM C compiler.
I am told that the z/OS 1.5 compiler and up should support this option
(though perhaps it is not properly documented).
If true, that obviously doesn't do you
Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
R.S. wrote:
Timothy Sipples wrote:
I think it's Windows Key-K (or something like that). But a lot of
keyboards don't have Windows keys (good!), and it's obscure anyway.
...and there are lot of localised versions of Windows. K doesn't
work in polish version,
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:49:22 -0500, Ward, Mike S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The usage domains do match the LPARs. That was a recommendation that I
found in the Installation Redbook. One other thing. If I set up the keys
in 1 LPAR can the other LPAR use them or do I have to
Thanks, Peter, and yes, we are at z/OS 1.4. So why should 1.4 SAMPLIB have
1.5-only content? Is that still APAR-able?
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Peter Relson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 12:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Name/Token Services
I started a project that I never finished (much less updated for the latest
compiler). If you check out my web page at:
http://home.comcast.net/~wmklein/IBM/ErrMsg.htm
It has an annotated version of the ERRMSG output - with a link to the
place in the COBOL documentation that relates to the
The COBOL2 CICS Translator option was removed from CICS TS and then
re-introduced by APAR PQ84313. It is my understanding that if you use
COBOL3, then you can use either the DBCS or NODBCS compiler option - but
that with older COBOL and COBOL2 translator options, you will have
problems with using
Steve Comstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
snip
And I can't figure out why they made that change,
since DBCS is, supposedly, on its eventual way
out, to be replaced by NATIONAL (Unicode). Any
idea why the default was changed? Especially since
the vast majority
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:17:17 -0500, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/27/2005
at 08:05 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
RESTORE very much presumes you haven't done an ACCEPT. ACCEPT is
pretty customary for FUNCTIONs.
Correct. Standard
- Original Message -
From: Bill Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 9:53 AM
snip
IGYPS0157-E A shift-out was found in column 50 without a matching
shift-in in a nonnumeric or national literal. The literal was processed as
written.
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 06/22/2005
at 12:41 PM, Perryman, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I can't find these blasted messages documented anywhere!!
According to IBM the COBOL messages are self explanatory.
1. Sure I'll respect you in the morning.
2. It's okay, Honey, I've had a vasectomy.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/22/2005
at 08:59 AM, Bill Fairchild [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
IIRC, the 3330 was the first DASD that had skip displacements.
My recollection is that the 3340, 3344 and 3350 were the first. I'll
have to see whether I still have my 3330 manuals.
--
Shmuel
Knowing nothing about DBCS or Unicode I have a silly question - is Unicode a
superset of DBCS? If so, that would explain how you could need to specify 1
or the other, but 1 is required for the other one. Just an uneducated
idea
Rex
-Original Message-
From: Steve Comstock
I think you're confusing the DBCS value of the NSYMBOL option with the
DBCS option.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 2:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DBCS
There is also a product called Inergen -- a mixture of 52% nitrogen, 40%
argon and 8% carbon dioxide -- that claims to be safe to the environment
and people.
Ned Hedrick
Sr. Mgr., Systems Administration
Transaction System Architects, Inc.
This e-mail message and any attachments may contain
In a message dated 6/22/2005 1:37:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please watch your attributions; I was not the author of the above.
Stripping the leading on quoted material is at best misleading.
OK. Sorry.
Bill Fairchild
Imbriale, Donald (Exchange) wrote:
I think you're confusing the DBCS value of the NSYMBOL option with the
DBCS option.
Well, it certainly is confusing. But I tried to make it
clear what I was saying is choosing the NATIONAL value
for the NSYMBOL option forces on the DBCS option. And
it still
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:37:03 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Max Scarpa wrote:
I'm applying a PSP for a new machine (z890-460). In documentation I found
many times references to 'Driver 55K'. As I'm not a z/OS sysprog, can
anyone explain me what it is ? A piece of HW ?
It is microcode
In a message dated 6/22/2005 1:37:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My recollection is that the 3340, 3344 and 3350 were the first. I'll
have to see whether I still have my 3330 manuals.
Could well be. I hesitated on saying 3330. I think the 3340 and 3344 had 3
And apparently succeeded ;~) Thanks for the info. Rex
-Original Message-
From: Steve Comstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 1:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DBCS as the default (was: Fw: Another OS/390 to z/OS 1.4 mi
gration question (COBOL)
I remnember Texas Tech getting a speed upgrade to there 370/145 back
in the 70's. It consisted of the CE removing three loops from the
145's microcode. The price tag for this upgrade? A cool $ 50K!
I remember a story from long ago: Honeywell had a processed that came in
single and double
Caveat: I get the daily digest so this might already have been
suggested...
--
At June 21, 2005 14:02, concerning Re: Change control software,
Natarajan Mohan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (to Neil Duffee):
With respect to the same subject, I would like to know if anybody uses
any of
In ISPF 6, issue the command ISPVCALL STATUS
Bo Xie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi,
Someone told me to type in D IPLINFO in master console to know
the z/OS version. But I can not touch the master console and get the
following errors by TSO login:
-
READY
D IPLINFO
IKJ56500I COMMAND D
Hi,
I know there are many users of my IPLINFO exec that monitor this
list so I thought I would post some news about a new feature.
After a recent thread on ISPF-L, I updated IPLINFO to have an alter ego
as a REXX function. The function execution format can be used to
retrieve up to 10 variables
In a message dated 6/22/2005 2:46:21 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
couple of devices/controller types, and is no longer documented. It would
let
you read ALL the bytes on the track, including the inter-record gaps and all
these SDs, inter alia. But what you
OK, to explain ...
*ALL* the DBCS (or NODBCS) compiler option does is to determine how
X'0E' and
X'0D' are treated when they appear WITHIN an alphanumeric literal. When
it is
turned on, then they are treated as SHIFT-OUT/IN control characters (and
this
may be shifting to Unicode *or* to
...
If you had the slower
processor and paid to upgrade to the faster, the CE removed a jumper
that made the clock run at half-speed! I can't swear this was true,
could be one of those urban computer myths
...
I saw it happen on a Honeywell Level 66, in the late 1970's.
This was at the
Bill Klein wrote:
OK, to explain ...
*ALL* the DBCS (or NODBCS) compiler option does is to determine how
X'0E' and
X'0D' are treated when they appear WITHIN an alphanumeric literal. When
it is
turned on, then they are treated as SHIFT-OUT/IN control characters (and
this
may be shifting to
IIRC hearing the same about the Series 6000 the Los Angeles Community
College District (where I both studied and worked) had. (Replaced a
perfectly good 370/158. Long political story.)
Ray
--
M. Ray Mullins
Roseville, CA, USA
http://www.catherdersoftware.com/
If you use ISPVCALL you need to enter it twice. The first execution
collects the data and the second displays the output.
Lizette Koehler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
I'm looking for advice on the use of IVSK / ISKE instructions,
IVSK is a fine righteous thing to play with. ISKE is not.
I have this program that loads (SVC 08) a couple of programs.
The program that load is running key9 , however SVC08 load them
in key8 with fetch protection...
Contents
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 06/22/2005
at 01:40 PM, Pommier, Rex R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Knowing nothing about DBCS or Unicode I have a silly question - is
Unicode a superset of DBCS?
No; Unicode is a 20-bit code with a 16-bit subset, compatible with ISO
10646, and does not use a SI/SO
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
06/22/2005
at 12:11 PM, Kok, Howi [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm not sure if I should post this in this list.
Yes; it's the most appropriate list for your question.
I'm not sure if I should post this in this list. Anyway, I hope
some of you can help me out. We have a
Actually, I meant to forward to the list
-Original Message-
From: Neil Duffee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 3:34 PM
To: Natarajan Mohan
Cc: Gibney, Dave
Subject: (Fwd) RE: Change control software [for Natural]
Natarajan: I expect that Dave really
If my old addled brain is thinking correctly, I believe over 10 years ago
IBM decided to no longer be nice to programs and require that all programs
close any files they open. And if they did not close them, the system would
then issue a SC03 abend.
Or am I getting too forgetful???
Lizette
On Jun 22, 2005, at 5:34 PM, Ed Gould wrote:
I will go for it hey its almost Friday.
If you can't figure out what the message is saying open a PMR with
the COBOL people tell them for the up teenth time that these
messages are NOT self describing.
Ed
IGYPS0157-E A shift-out was found
Joe Zitzelberger wrote:
On Jun 22, 2005, at 5:34 PM, Ed Gould wrote:
I will go for it hey its almost Friday.
If you can't figure out what the message is saying open a PMR with
the COBOL people tell them for the up teenth time that these messages
are NOT self describing.
Ed
Generally you can get away with not closing DCBs and the system will
close them. The problem occurs when the DCB is either in GETMAINed
storage, or in a secondary load module brought in by the jobstep program
with a LOAD (which is pretty much the same thing) - AND the storage gets
freed before end
On Jun 22, 2005, at 7:04 PM, Steve Comstock wrote:
Joe Zitzelberger wrote:
On Jun 22, 2005, at 5:34 PM, Ed Gould wrote:
I will go for it hey its almost Friday.
If you can't figure out what the message is saying open a PMR
with the COBOL people tell them for the up teenth time that
At first LOAD (SVC 08) is a NONO under CICS as in case of transactions abends
nobody will ever free the storage for this prog. Look at the CICS API Exec Cics
Load command.
CICS will then LOAD the program depending on the RENT,RMODE into the RDSA,
SDSA, ERDSA or ESDSA.
The Exec Cics will give
This is attributable to me, for the record.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 11:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HALON et al
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
On 6/22/05, Gabriel Tully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, 2nd level refers to z/OS running as a guest under z/VM
Thank you very much for your reply!
Is there any reference for 2nd level? I want to copy in/out some
files between the host z/VM and the guest z/OS, but don't know how to
do it!
Best
Does anyone have any experience with 3494-B20 microcode level R7.4?
Regards,
Bil McKinley
SLF Consulting Services, inc.
67 Wall St Ste 2211-0094
New York, NY 10005
t/ 212.945.0062
m/ 917.224.6012
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
I remember the 'go-faster' stripes that Burroughs had to put on the B2700 after
'upgrading ' it from a
B2500. I beleive this was needed to convince the Customer that he had actually
got something for his (quite a lot of) money.
this upgrade was really little more than a jumper chjange clock
Does anyone have any experience with 3494-B20 microcode level R7.4?
Regards,
Bil McKinley
SLF Consulting Services, inc.
67 Wall St Ste 2211-0094
New York, NY 10005
t/ 212.945.0062
m/ 917.224.6012
--
For
I got frustrated at the inability to test anything other than return
codes the like with JCL IF. Maybe I'm re-inventing the wheel here, but I
wrote a little Rexx script that reduced my frustration.
INTERP interprets the value of its argument and returns the result as
its return code. So you can
Hi all,
Do you have some idea of how to obtain PDS directory information using
batch job? And another question: how to obtain the %used of a whole
storage group?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
- Original Message -
From: Joe Zitzelberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: Another OS/390 to z/OS 1.4 migration question (COBOL)
On Jun 22, 2005, at 7:04 PM, Steve Comstock wrote:
IGYPS0157-E A shift-out was
86 matches
Mail list logo
