We tried all of them. It didn't work for us. We are trying the carrot
lane now...
Itschak
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Doc Farmer
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 8:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How do you train
Three simple words.
Whip.
Chair.
Gun.
:D
Itschak Mugzach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am looking for some hints, PowerPoint, etc. on how to train our
operations. Thanks for your advise.
Itschak
--
For
I am looking for some hints, PowerPoint, etc. on how to train our
operations. Thanks for your advise.
Itschak
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Does anyone know if it is possible to have a disk device being accessed at
the same time by a 3990 control unit and a 2105 control unit?
It is not!
Differing technology.
Differing back-ends.
*It is possible*. BTDT. I used such (weird in fact) configuration on HDS
9960 ma
-- snip --
If the volume was _already_ defined in the storage group, then you did
the init, you should just be able to vary it online. You need to do
-- snip --
The SMS volume status should also be set to ENABLE. This many not be the
case depending on how the volume(s) were initially added to the
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 22:50:45 -0400, Bruce Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I'm having trouble understanding exactly what you are asking.
>By USP I assume you mean an Hitachi USP.
MP Reply: Yes, HDS TagmaStor or USP is what I am using.
>As I understand it, the USP
>can have its own disks internal
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 04/03/2006
10:02:11 PM:
> IIRC a z890 will only run a OS in 64-bit mode, no 31-bit mode, in an
> LPAR. It may be possible to run a non-64-bit OS under z/VM.
>
>
>
> B Sysprog wrote:
> > Hello -
> >
> > I have been asked to identify if it is possible t
That will be news to those that run OS/390 2.10 on the z/890 and those
of us that ran z/OS 1.4 and 1.5 in ARCHLVL 1 on the z/890...
John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
IIRC a z890 will only run a OS in 64-bit mode, no 31-bit mode, in an
LPAR. It may be possible to run a non-64-bit OS under z/VM.
My best guess is that the HSM exit isn't actually working as planned.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Victor Zhang
> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 9:14 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Confusing IEC507D
>
Hello Russel,
Thanks for quick response.
The volume that caused IEC507D issued is indeed CA1 managed,see below:
00.05.00 S0065485 MONDAY,03 APR 2006
00.31.59 S0065485 IECTMS9 A844,860268,HSMBT ,SYS17000,PERMANENT
,0001,.HMIGTA
00.31.59 S0065485 *IEC507D E A844,860268,HSMBT,HSMBT,.
Victor,
When HSM creates a tape, it puts an expiration date of 99/365 in the HDR1 of
the tape. This is the expiration date that the operating system looks at
when making the determination to issue the IEC507D or not. CA-1 will then
automatically respond to the IEC507D for a CA-1 controlled volume
Hello list,
I have a question regarding IEC507D:
I am using HSM and CA1, and the tape volumes used by HSM is protectd
by expiration date, and when HSM thinks the contents of a tape
volume is expired,it will notify CA1 via an exit similar to the exit
used by RMM interface with HSM.
Howev
MXG works well for DCOLLECT data.
Dale Houg
home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Andy White
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 7:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Dcollect
Does anyone out there hav
Does anyone know if it is possible to have a disk device being accessed at
the same time by a 3990 control unit and a 2105 control unit? We are
approaching a situation where we could potentially run out of interfaces
within the array (USP) and if this worked it would alleviate (temporarily
at le
Sorry this reply went to Gilbert rather than the list its a resend
with a change to the TO:
Will Gilbert please correct his email client?
Ed
-
On Apr 3, 2006, at 10:34 AM, Gilbert Saint-Flour wrote:
On Monday 03 April 2006 11:00, B Sysprog wrote:
I have been asked to identify
IIRC a z890 will only run a OS in 64-bit mode, no 31-bit mode, in an
LPAR. It may be possible to run a non-64-bit OS under z/VM.
B Sysprog wrote:
Hello -
I have been asked to identify if it is possible to run an old,old version
of MVS/SP and DFP (3.2) on a zSeries processor (z890). (this i
On Apr 3, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Chase, John wrote:
--SNIP
For example trying to deduce what is going on when a system
is in a wait state.
This is 2006. We have telephones now.
Besides, the "Vulcan mind meld" is fictional, and didn't work with
machines anywa
Does anyone out there have a SAS or REXX exec to format a Dcollect? I was
going to write something but first thought id ask, I need to create a
spread sheet with information some of fields are binary and packed and
would be easier to start with someone else's code.
Thanks in advance
Andy S Whit
John,
Both IBM's 3494/VTS and CA's CA-Vtape allow for virtual-volomes to be
defined larger then a real 3490E. I believe we are talking about in the
range of 1+ Gigabytes per virtual volume. If the dataset(s) being placed on
the virtual-volume end before that, no wasted space (the beauty of
virtual
>The simple answer is yes, you need to do a POR with your correct IOCDS
I'd go the powers to be!
Head hung low, and claim "mea culpa"!
Take the hit, POR.
And, then if I still have my job, delete all the crap IOCDS's, so it won't
happen again.
At least one device has to be defined as dynamic, for
>Does anyone know if it is possible to have a disk device being accessed at
the same time by a 3990 control unit and a 2105 control unit?
It is not!
Differing technology.
Differing back-ends.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
Matt,
The simple answer is yes, you need to do a POR with your correct IOCDS
However, how desparate are you at avoiding an POR...
If you have a test partition on the same machine you might be able to do
something, as you only need one of the lpars to be in sync to be able to
do dynamic change
Does anyone know if it is possible to have a disk device being accessed at
the same time by a 3990 control unit and a 2105 control unit? We are
approaching a situation where we could potentially run out of interfaces
within the array (USP) and if this worked it would alleviate (temporarily
at leas
I am trying to recycle a set of DFHSM migration tapes from real 3490E to
virtual 3490E in a 3494-B10 VTS. I am getting the message:
ARC0352I DATA SET HSMMIG.HMIG.T573321.DPHGV.RLO.J5343 TOO LARGE FOR
MAXIMUM TAPE VOLUME LIMIT
Looking up the message reveals that HSM is "hard coded" to limit a
sing
>I now recall having heard of ESA/370 before then, and it might have run
on [some of] the 3090s.
I had it on 2E's, an S, and 2J's.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
--
For IBM-MAIN s
In a message dated 4/3/2006 2:17:38 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm pretty sure the only safe way to recover from this is to do another POR
with the right IOCDS. But does anybody have any other suggestions for some
slick way to dynamically get things back in sync
NO.. You must have DYNAMIC turn on in the IOCDS...we did a POR just for
that.
Also, you will load the IOCDS that you had to load anyone.
riginal Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Matt Simpson
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 1:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN
Dennis Roach
United Space Alliance
600 Gemini Avenue
Mail Code USH-4A3L
Houston, Texas 77058
Voice: (281) 282-2975
Page:(713) 736-8275
Fax: (281) 282-3583
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions expressed by me are mine and may not agree with my employer or any
person, company, or thing
Will that possibly be changing in the future? It would be nice to be able
to do some changes, especially when implementing a new technology like
OSA-ICC. There would have to be a means of marking some consoles as
"protected" or something though, to prevent mistakes from leaving you in a
consol
If the volume was _already_ defined in the storage group, then you did
the init, you should just be able to vary it online. You need to do
Activate (I believe) when you add the volume to your configuration, but
unless you are changing the ACS routines you don't need to Translate
(which convert
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Gould
>
> On Apr 3, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Chase, John wrote:
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Gould
> >>
> >> [ snip ]
> >> I think that some types of sysprog d
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
>
> >ISTR the **FIRST** ESA **hardware** announcement from IBM
> came on Sept.
> 5, 1990. Seems unlikely there'd have been an ESA operating
> system in use by a customer before then.
>
> MVS/ESA 3.1.0e
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 13:10:57 -0500, Scott Fagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>No. An IPL is required to change the CONSOLE definitions in CONSOLxx.
>
I was hoping you would also add: "But watch this space". :-)
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:08:52 -0500, Laine, Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>but how do I pick up the consoles defined to the CONSOLxx parm?
>Can this be done without IPLing?
No. An IPL is required to change the CONSOLE definitions in CONSOLxx.
Scott Fagen
z/OS Core Technology Design
IBM Poughke
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 10:59:32 -0400, B Sysprog wrote:
>I have been asked to identify if it is possible to run an old,old version
>of MVS/SP and DFP (3.2) on a zSeries processor (z890). (this is not an
>April fool joke)
>
>Anybody have any positive comments on this?
>Is there a way to run MVS/SP und
Thanks John,
"McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 12:56 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Quick SMS Question.
>
>
> I just added
John wrote:
" My question is do I have to do a Translate, Validate,
Activate on the ACD routines before I can use the volume?"
The activation only is necessary.
Hope this helps,
George Rodriguez
abc Distributing, LLC
(305) 919-1900 ext. 21246
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ron and Jenny Hawkins wrote:
However, this still leaves me confused over IBM's constant reference to
blocking and reblocking of load modules. Does this make the authors as
stupid as me?
Only in being confused by the language - when they refer to "blocking"
of load modules, they are referring t
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 12:56 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Quick SMS Question.
>
>
> I just added a volume to my SMS SGDEVE goup and after looking
> for
On Apr 3, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Gould
On Apr 2, 2006, at 7:12 PM, tony babonas wrote:
Gee I wonder, hypothetically: if all companies did allow
teleworking
for sysprogs, would there be a shortage,
I just added a volume to my SMS SGDEVE goup and after looking for it with ISMF
I saw that it was there.
All id did was run an ickdsf job (init) with the STGR parameter.
My question is do I have to do a Translate, Validate, Activate on the ACD
routines before I can use the volume?
I'm running z/OS 1.5 on a MP 3000.
Somehow I screwed up and pointed to the wrong IOCDS at power-on reset,
and loaded a 4-year-old IOCDS, which didn't match my current IODF.
So I got the message about hardware and software being out of sync, and
dynamic changes not allowed.
I've seen this before
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:19:05 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
>> Mark Jacobs wrote:
>>
>> >The first Y2k MVS was either 5.1 or 5.2.2 (1994-1995 time frame).
>> >
>> >MVS/ESA 3.2 is from the late 80's
>
>ISTR the **FIRST** ESA **hardware** announcement from IBM came on Sept.
>5, 1990. Seems unlikely there'
>ISTR the **FIRST** ESA **hardware** announcement from IBM came on Sept.
5, 1990. Seems unlikely there'd have been an ESA operating system in
use by a customer before then.
MVS/ESA 3.1.0e was available when I started at the Bank of Nova Scotia in 1989.
Or, very shortly after that.
That was not t
On Apr 2, 2006, at 11:48 PM, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
Ed Gould wrote:
I think that some types of sysprog duties have to be hands on.
Not all mind you but some. I have wondered about the perceived
benefits myself. The case above the person worked out of their
house in Chicago area. So
Steve,
The answer to his question was no. I expanded on some issues he could
expect to find - some sooner, some later. He also ought to expect issues
with error recovery (although I'm on a system that IS currently supported
and we found a very new issue with error recovery just last week... but
That may very well be right. My memory isn't as good as it was back
then.
Mark Jacobs
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 1:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Support for MVS/SP 3.2
Anyone have the Open-SSH (unsupported version for 2.10)
that they'd be willing to send to me ?
Also, has anyone tried the new supported version on 2.10?
I know it's not officially supported, but does anyone know if it works on
OS/390 ?
Thanks,
Dave
---
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of SArnett
>
> The original issuer requested whether the op sys would run on
> a z/890 and not whether his system was y2K complient or
> whether he was running that version legally. My assumption
> would be that since
The original issuer requested whether the op sys would run on a z/890
and not whether his system was y2K complient or whether he was running
that version legally. My assumption would be that since we are six
years past y2K that he is not concerned with that and if he is presently
running ESA o
The first Y2k MVS was either 5.1 or 5.2.2 (1994-1995 time frame).
MVS/ESA 3.2 is from the late 80's
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Schmidt
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 11:28 AM
To: I
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
> Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 7:00 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Systems Programmer Levels Justification
>
> >I wonder how much motor vehicle fuel, wear'n'tear,
> insurance, exposure
> to r
On Monday 03 April 2006 11:00, B Sysprog wrote:
> I have been asked to identify if it is possible to run an old,old
> version of MVS/SP and DFP (3.2) on a zSeries processor (z890).
I seem to recall DFP 3.2, but what is MVS/SP 3.2.2 ? My recollection is
that MVS/ESA jumped directly from 3.1.
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 10:59:32 -0400, B Sysprog wrote:
>Hello -
>
>I have been asked to identify if it is possible to run an old,old version
>of MVS/SP and DFP (3.2) on a zSeries processor (z890). (this is not an
>April fool joke)
>
>Putting aside the issue of lack of support for such an old release
teleworking here in the chicago area is becoming
commonplace. our usual relationships are with branches
and contractors overseas. the cubicle and face time is
becoming the 8 track tape of technology.
our company is short of office space...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Paul,
The elegant and user-friendly way to do this sort of thing is to exploit the
use of the PORT statement BIND parameter in conjunction with VIPAs. This way
you can offer an REXEC service on port number 512 for either TSO or USS and
distinguish the two by IP address which, of course, can be ext
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:03:23AM -0500, McKown, John wrote:
> > I have been asked to identify if it is possible to run an old,old
> > version of MVS/SP and DFP (3.2) on a zSeries processor (z890). (this is
> > not an April fool joke)
> Impossible. The zSeries does not implement the old I/O instru
>I wonder how much motor vehicle fuel, wear'n'tear, insurance, exposure
to road hazards, and time could be saved if only 10% of the IT shops
that can but don't allow telecommuting, would allow it.
I don't know about the States, but, here in Canada, there a worker safety and
insurance issues.
I do
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of B Sysprog
> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 10:00 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Support for MVS/SP 3.2.2 on zSeries???
>
>
> Hello -
>
> I have been asked to identify if it is pos
- Original Message
From: "Laine, Rogers" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm installing Visara equipment on z/os 1.4 and would like to add
these new consoles addresses to my active system without doing a IPL.
I see where I can do a SET CNGRP=xx to pick up the new console groups,
but how do I pick u
Hello -
I have been asked to identify if it is possible to run an old,old version
of MVS/SP and DFP (3.2) on a zSeries processor (z890). (this is not an
April fool joke)
Putting aside the issue of lack of support for such an old release, I seem
to recall that
nothing older than OS/390 R10 w
>From CBT file 11 PDS member OLDDOC. If you find something better please
get it back into circulation. Thanks, Sam
THE FOLLOWING IS AN OLD MEMO THAT W
In a recent note, Steve Comstock said:
> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 08:36:12 -0600
>
> tso exec "'pt6820a.rexx(activate)'" exec
>
> Again, just a shot in the dark playing with punctuation;
>
That ought to work, because /bin/tso takes as its arguments
a nonempty sequence of tokens which it co
Ian Worthington wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 07:37:46 -0600, Steve Comstock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not sure. But at least try using quotes like this:
tso exec "//'fully_qualified_library(exec_name)'" exec
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
Thanks Steve.
Not sure if you meant to have EXEC
In a recent note, Ian Worthington said:
> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:23:13 -0500
>
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 07:37:46 -0600, Steve Comstock
> >tso exec "//'fully_qualified_library(exec_name)'" exec
>
> Not sure if you meant to have EXEC twice? I'm guessing not, but
>
The second EXEC indicates
In a recent note, Ian Worthington said:
> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 02:38:25 -0500
>
> (Not sure if this is the right place for this or not. Is there somewhere
> more focused on TCP/IP issues?)
>
Yes.
> Does anyone know if it is possible in fact to REXEC a TSO EXEC stored
> in a PDS access
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johnny Luo
> Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 9:32 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: How to save data sets dump(from dfdss) in pc?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've dumped some of my data sets via df
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 07:37:46 -0600, Steve Comstock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Not sure. But at least try using quotes like this:
>
>tso exec "//'fully_qualified_library(exec_name)'" exec
>
>Kind regards,
>
>-Steve Comstock
Thanks Steve.
Not sure if you meant to have EXEC twice? I'm guessing
I'm installing Visara equipment on z/os 1.4 and would like to add
these new consoles addresses to my active system without doing a IPL.
I see where I can do a SET CNGRP=xx to pick up the new console groups,
but how do I pick up the consoles defined to the CONSOLxx parm?
Can this be done without I
In a message dated 4/3/2006 8:34:00 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Send an email to MXG technical support and they can either tell you how
to do it today or they'll put the support in the product if it doesn't
exist. Barry loves finding data he has never seen before
Hi Barbara,
If you are not already subscribed you might enjoy to subscribe to MXG-L
this would be a good place to post your question.
http://www.mxg.com/frame_mxgl.asp
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 09:36 -0400, David Andrews wrote:
> Upshot: if you're a relatively high-paid US systems programmer,
> telecommuting is a two-edged sword. IOW, be careful what you wish for.
Yep - I'd be happy to be paid to sit under one of the gum trees up the
back yard and keep sites hummi
In a message dated 4/3/2006 2:47:21 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I live in Vermont, worked for a D.C. area office, and connected to a
>mainframe in Massachusetts before retiring. We had work group meetings
>quarterly, and conference calls every month or so. Othe
Ian Worthington wrote:
(Not sure if this is the right place for this or not. Is there somewhere
more focused on TCP/IP issues?)
I have a rexx exec in a pds I would like to execute via REXEC from a
foreign host, but when I REXEC to mvs I end up at $HOME and, unlike in
FTP, seem unable to CD to a
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 19:12 -0500, tony babonas wrote:
> Gee I wonder, hypothetically: if all companies did
> allow teleworking for sysprogs, would there be a
> shortage, or excess for that matter?
The phone lines don't stop at the border! If companies routinely
allowed telecommuting for sysprog
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 09:23 -0400, John Eells wrote:
> > BTW. Is there a current concurrent limit for an address space.
>
>
> Sam answered this one pretty comprehensively.
Shame really - such a waste of a great lead-in line ...
tada !!!
what about a non-current concurrent limit ...
or maybe a
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Gould
>
> On Apr 2, 2006, at 7:12 PM, tony babonas wrote:
>
> > Gee I wonder, hypothetically: if all companies did allow
teleworking
> > for sysprogs, would there be a shortage, or excess for that matter?
> > Te
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List,
I just stumbled across this statement concerning z/OS 1.8 and GRS.
"A new programming interface for GRS that is designed to allow authorized
programs to set their own concurrent enqueue (ENQ) limits within their
address spaces. "
This is actually one of
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of tony babonas
>
> Gee I wonder, hypothetically: if all companies did allow
> teleworking for sysprogs, would there be a shortage, or
> excess for that matter? Tele-freedom would certainly smooth
> out the geographi
Gerhard/Shmuel,
Where ever the reference I had to Text records splitting on instruction
boundaries is, I can no longer find. This may be another senior moment!
References I've found all reference CSECT boundaries as a point to terminate
text records.
So I consider myself better educated.
However
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 01:07 -0500, Ron van der Zande wrote:
> Shane,
>
> why should the ENQ monitor give the answer I am looking for?
> I now, an allocation is resulting in a SYSDSN ENQ and indirectly I have
> HLQ's I am looking. But a catalog search with IDCAMS or SUPERLOCATE I do
> not see with
We are running SAS/MXG on z/OS only. We have a requirement to send VM
performance (MONWRITE) data to MVS and do ITSV statistics under SAS. I can't
seem to find out how to present the MONWRITE data to SAS. I have been
studying the MXG information for some dcb info to use, and we have tried
them all
-- snip --
>From Item RTA60115
GRS maintains, in the GRS vector table (GVT), a threshold value
for unauthorized callers in GVTCREQ (the default is 4096) and
a threshold value for authorized callers in GVTCREQA (the default
is 30,000). These thresholds are in the nucleus.
.
.
The current Auth
Thanks for the response, Timothy. I've read that book cover to cover but
it doesn't seem to answer my question: are the physical PCICC coprocessors
available to a linux guest running in an IFL?
>From section 7.3.1 (p. 242) of the zSeries Grypto Guide:
3. If you are using a zSeries z900 GA2 machin
>From Item RTA60115
GRS maintains, in the GRS vector table (GVT), a threshold value
for unauthorized callers in GVTCREQ (the default is 4096) and
a threshold value for authorized callers in GVTCREQA (the default
is 30,000). These thresholds are in the nucleus.
At a Version 4 level (with O
xalien wrote:
hi all, I apologize to re-post my question about secure tcp-ip but it's
extremly importat for me understand... it's possible to use a secure
TCP connection without OMVS services? I would like, if possible, using
only MVS and writing a server application in COBOL/ASM. Is there some
s
AFPSOFT (www.afpsoft.de) has products that will convert formdef and pagedef
objects to source code.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Saichon C
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 1:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Conver
Saichon ,
I´m not sure, but I think you should look for Solimar systems products.
I´ve heard that they have a very good software that manage AFP
environment.
Regards.
Geraldo Magela S. Barbosa
Analista de Sistemas - DITEM
Banco Rural S.A.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telefo
Do you know any software or utilities that can convert compiled AFP resource
objects (such as pagedef and formdef) to source code?
Thank you in advance
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
I have problem that I have to modify some AFP pagedefs but don't know where
the source code is.
Do you know any software or utilities that can convert compiled AFP resouce
objects to source codes?
Thank you in advance...
Saichon C.
---
On 4/3/06, Terry Sambrooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Johnny,
>
> With regard to your query -
>
> "I've dumped some of my data sets via dfdss.These data sets include
> ordinary PDS, load module libraries and VSAM.It's a logical data set dump
> and the output
> is a PS data set on dasd(recfm=
Hello,
I have a problem with HSM issuing reserve for volume that contains BCDS,
when automatic backup starts. It doesn't cause problems every day, but
occasionaly does. What bothers me is that I have in DFHSM procedure:
DFSMSHSM PROC CMD=00,
EMERG=NO,
LOGSW=YES,
Sorry for my lack of precision.
Of course I was interested in an alternative to:
http://www.chicago-soft.com/qref/index.html
And I heard rumours that there *are* alternatives under way.
TIA,
Arthur
>
>Date:Sun, 2 Apr 2006 20:50:04 -0600
>From:Timothy Sipples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subjec
Hello List,
I just stumbled across this statement concerning z/OS 1.8 and GRS.
"A new programming interface for GRS that is designed to allow authorized
programs to set their own concurrent enqueue (ENQ) limits within their
address spaces. "
Can anyone shed some light as to why you would need th
(Not sure if this is the right place for this or not. Is there somewhere
more focused on TCP/IP issues?)
I have a rexx exec in a pds I would like to execute via REXEC from a
foreign host, but when I REXEC to mvs I end up at $HOME and, unlike in
FTP, seem unable to CD to a PDS. And trying to tso e
96 matches
Mail list logo
