-- snip --
If the volume was _already_ defined in the storage group, then you did
the init, you should just be able to vary it online. You need to do
-- snip --
The SMS volume status should also be set to ENABLE. This many not be the
case depending on how the volume(s) were initially added to the
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Does anyone know if it is possible to have a disk device being accessed at
the same time by a 3990 control unit and a 2105 control unit?
It is not!
Differing technology.
Differing back-ends.
*It is possible*. BTDT. I used such (weird in fact) configuration on HDS
9960
I am looking for some hints, PowerPoint, etc. on how to train our
operations. Thanks for your advise.
Itschak
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
Three simple words.
Whip.
Chair.
Gun.
:D
Itschak Mugzach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for some hints, PowerPoint, etc. on how to train our
operations. Thanks for your advise.
Itschak
--
For
We tried all of them. It didn't work for us. We are trying the carrot
lane now...
Itschak
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Doc Farmer
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 8:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How do you
The original DEBE was an IPL'able deck of cards. You'd put the deck
in the card reader, dial in the reader's address, and press the LOAD
button (or IPL button or whatever).
IIRC, the original command codes were 2 hex digits that corresponded
to CCW opcodes.
In the early 1970s, while working
There are quite a few DCOLLECT processing examples on the CBT Tape -
www.cbttape.org
Download File #1 and have a look.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rs.com/portfolio/mxi/
That's very odd. Usually, they enjoy whip. Sometimes a bit too much, if you
get my drift...
As for the chair, it should always be held to protect your midsection as they
throw tape cartridges at you. Trust me, when we used the old 3420-style tapes
it was a lot more dodgy in those
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 10:07:53 -0500, Jay Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Of course, if IBM had a sane licensing policy, he could run it on
Hercules...)
IANAL but I would have thought that he could run it under Hercules under
zLinux on a z890. That solves all the problems, architectural and Y2K
Hi all,
we have our own dfsflgx0 IMS exit for IMS updates capture. We have a problem
with an understanding of a commit process. We used x'37' record as a
COMMIT. Sometimes, we did not received this record after UPDATE transaction
in DEDB. We begun to use x'5937' solving the problem, but sometimes
Hi All,
We have recently purchased an ATL3584 with 3592-E05 drives and have installed
all relevant '3592DEVICE' put-bucket fixes - quite a few.
The Robot comes online but when we vary the devices online we get the following
message:
V 300,ONLINE
Micheal,
I'm still a bit confused? are you talking about the cu groups within the
USP, or CU definitions within HCD (ie CUADD=). Yes they are related, but
I dont understand what you mean by 'Logical CUs accessing the same
disk'. AFAIK each disk (ie 3390) is defined to only one CU image within
Meganen Naidoo - BCX - Data Centre Services wrote:
Hi All,
We have recently purchased an ATL3584 with 3592-E05 drives and have installed
all relevant '3592DEVICE' put-bucket fixes - quite a few.
The Robot comes online but when we vary the devices online we get the following
message:
V
You can download a sample for processing DCOLLECT with DSFSORT from the
DFSORT web site.
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/storage/support/software/sort/mvs/srtmdwn.html
Have a nice day,
Dave Betten
DFSORT Development, Performance Lead
IBM Corporation
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DFSORT/MVSontheweb
Hi Arie,
This a pretty deep IMS question and you might get a better response on
the IMS-L mailing list which does get good activity and is widely
subscribed by a number of the IMS guru's.
https://po.missouri.edu/archives/ims-l.html
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Thanks to all the responders so far. I am afraid I was given no information
other than MVS/SP 3.2.2 and DFP 3.2. These products are licensed (and
running on some old IBM hardware, which has yet to be identified) by a
non-US company that we acquired. Migration is the goal; how we accomplish
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 08:57:05AM -0400, B Sysprog wrote:
My initial thoughts are that the applications need to be moved, rather
than the entire MVS image.
Yes, you're dealing with an application migration. You won't be able to run
the image directly on your z890, and while you may be able to
Roy,
The various posts have mentioned a few things that we can do with the USP
(and previous generations), and some sites have been able use achieve this
dual personality - but only after some very careful planning.
However, just because you can do something doesn't mean you should do it.
As
Ron,
When you say 'genned as 3990' I presume you mean how the USP interface
emulation has been defined.
Roy
Ron and Jenny Hawkins wrote:
Michael and I have talked offline and your comment regarding toleration for
2105 devices genned as 3990 may be what he is looking for.
Ron
BTW the
Hello;
I know that HCM 1.7 comes with some new features, including a preview
capability but I would like to know if there is a way to generate or
create the HCM reports in PDF format. In this way I can make it available
to people that need to take a lot on it.
TIA,
G.
There are a number of free and priced tools to generate PDF files from
anything that can print by acting as a printer driver. My favorite is
the combination of FinePrint PDFfactory
http://www.softwarelabs.com/pdf/pdffactory.htm
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
04/02/2006
at 11:05 PM, Doc Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Anybody know where I can find the program specs and variables for
running DEBE (Does Everything But Eat)?
Which DEBE? I may have some documentation lying around for MVTDEBE.
2 of which were a great humour bit
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/02/2006
at 02:31 PM, Gerhard Postpischil [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
RLD, CESD, IDR, etc. are all control records - you're just haggling
over the price G
Then how do you distinguish CTL from the others?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/03/2006
at 09:07 PM, Ron and Jenny Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
However, this still leaves me confused over IBM's constant reference
to blocking and reblocking of load modules. Does this make the
authors as stupid as me?
The authors regard the csect as the basic
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/03/2006
at 10:28 AM, Tom Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Was that level of MVS Y2K compliant?
I doubt it; I don't think that even MVS/ESA 4.3 was Y2K compliant.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 04/02/2006
at 08:50 PM, Timothy Sipples [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Receiving a fair price on any product requires a *credible* market
alternative in *your* particular situation. Things that bring
credibility to the discussion:
- a project actually underway to switch
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
04/03/2006
at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't know about the States, but, here in Canada, there a worker
safety and insurance issues. I don't understand the details, but some
companies are thinking of backing off, or (in my case) refusal.
While
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/02/2006
at 01:28 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Yah. When I use tn3270 X, the tabs have already been translated to
colons in the data stream. Now I'm in LOGMODE Hell (again). Is there
any way to make the session confess everything it knows about the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/02/2006
at 09:25 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is VTIOC part of TSO?
Yes; it's the VTAM equivalent of TIOC, and is the interface between
TPUT et al and VTAM.
So my tn3270 X is identifying itself to the
host as a different terminal type, resulting in a
In a message dated 4/4/2006 9:17:18 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
capability but I would like to know if there is a way to generate or
create the HCM reports in PDF format. In this way I can make it available
to people that need to take a lot on it.
Haven't
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 7:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Support for MVS/SP 3.2.2 on zSeries???
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/03/2006
at
In a message dated 4/4/2006 2:24:48 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are quite a few DCOLLECT processing examples on the CBT Tape -
www.cbttape.org
Yeah _www.xephon.com_ (http://www.xephon.com) has archives search and a
sorry user interface,
but there's
i also think that the exit isn't getting control because you never showed
the 'expired message, ie,
TMSTMSTV-00 HD0642 EXPIRE COMPLETE - EDMID=HSM
Jack Kelly
LA Systems @ US Courts
x 202-502-2390
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
While others have made it mandatory. One of which, I believe, you used
to work for.
Not totally mandatory.
But, preferable.
It costs around $7,000 CDN per year to rent cubicle space for one employee in
Toronto.
And, that's not a very big cube!
For the cost of a printer ($100), supplies
Tom,
I was not picking on you. I was trying to get the thread back on
track. I was curious about the correct answer to the question and did
not feel that the thread was going anywhere. After my post(not because
of it, mind you), I saw some superb posts that laid all of the
Hi,
We originally allowed MIDAW support to default on for z/OS R6 but
disabled it when we ran into a possibly related problem with DB2 V8 from
APAR OA15034. IMHO the default should have been disabled in R6 R7 and
changed to enabled in R8. The problem with DB2 V8 here turned out to
produce
Steve,
My skin is thicker than that -- no apology necessary, but thanks for the
offer. I agree that off-track threads are a notorious problem on ibm-
main.
My mind was wandering around the problem (maybe I shouldn't have posted so
early) because the issue was so off the wall.
I'm wondering if
Any thoughts on the best way to handle the backup of the various
catalogs and RMM files for disaster recovery purposes? TO be specific,
1) On weekends we backup our DASD to tape
2) We run DB2 Image backups to tape
3) After that completes, we have a job that runs a copies DR related
libraries and
Anything on www.bitsavers.org ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Tried and true - Backup from Shadowimage, Flashcopy or Timefinder P-i-T
copies.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Longnecker, Dennis
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2006 11:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Disaster Recovery,
Patrick,
I've only done a very quick search, but I found some newer documentation
that might provide some clues. There's a redpiece that got published
recently here:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpapers/pdfs/redp4131.pdf
Starting on page 5 there's a brief section on HMC configuration. There
Roy,
I meant using Transparency mode by specifying CNTLUNIT=3990, even though the
underlying hardware is emulating a 2105 controller. That's what I thought
you meant.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roy Hewitt
Sent:
There are four kinds of things to backup
1. DB2 applications
2. Non database application data
3. DB2 system data (catalog and directory) and log files
4. system data.
And you should back them up in that order because
1. DB2 backups are dependent on the information in tape catalog, MVS catalog
and
In a recent note, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) said:
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 22:21:18 -0300
There's an ISPF panel that can display session properties, including
the response to READ PARTITION - QUERY.
(after some stumbling around with manuals and terminal) ITYM
ISPF; 0; Environ;
In a message dated 4/4/2006 10:51:42 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/perf/reports/zvm/html/crypto.html
which makes for an interesting read. It looks like the crypto hardware
does give a pretty good boost to Linux on z900 with PCICC, so I
There are some really excellent papers in the CMG proceedings
http://www.cmg.org/ about Batch Tuning. You do need to be an active
member of CMG to view most of them but a few are available to anyone
including this one which was a CMG99 Best Paper.
REDUCING THE BATCH WINDOW TO START EURO
Greetings again,
We're in another cycle of hardware upgrades. It seems our z800 tapped
out after a frenzy of migrations from tape to DASD in order to prepare
for a lights-out type of operation while the bird flu pandemonium was in
full swing.
Enough of the history... Now that we're looking
I am probably missing something obvious -
When setting up a subsystem, how do I tell the system to call a custom
function to Allocate, Open, Get, Close or Deallocate a dataset?
Doesn't the association come from a table built using the IEFSSVTI macro?
But the list of codes SSI Function Codes Your
On 4/4/06, Ceruti, Gerard G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI
I am cloning a zOS 1.6 system and get the following during the IPL,
BPXP018I THREAD 0F7513D1, IN PROCESS 2, ENDED 151
WITHOUT BEING UNDUBBED WITH COMPLETION CODE84000FF2, AND
REASON CODE
0002.
My unconfirmed source says in the next month or so...
snip
Any crystal balls in the audience ???
/snip
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roy Hewitt) wrote:
However, how desparate are you at avoiding an POR...
Since everything seems to be working OK (which surprises me a little),
not really desperate.
As I said how desparate are you..
Not desperate enough to try something
if you're sure it's not in a library, ams del volent will get the entry
out of the volcat.
Jack Kelly
LA Systems @ US Courts
x 202-502-2390
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
Note: the Reply to is set to me instead of the list.
It's time to look for alternatives. I've had one
billable day all year and nothing on the books for
the rest of my life. Time to move on, I guess.
Anyone have any leads for me to do temp or contract
work? Preferably in the Colorado front
Victor,
Just how urgent is the need for your subsystem to perform the field
obfuscation you discussed here last month?
Try looking at macro IEFSSDA in SYS1.MODGEN. Those subsystem function
codes (16-19) should get you moving again.
As for the SMS comment... that's a good question. SMS is a
In a message dated 4/4/2006 8:39:20 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the TrueCopy case, it means that PPRC commands cannot be used to manage
the storage because the OS wants to see 2105 format commands with the LSS
specified, but the controller rejects the
Regarding what's different about the IPL process... Nothing if you
still had the IODF that corresponds to the IOCDS. To make a change the
hardware and software need to be in sync.
The active IODF per D IOS,CONFIG is what you are running with.
Regards,
Kevin
Tom,
Thanks a lot for the IEFSSDA pointer! [Why it's not documented in Using
the SSI is beyond me]
Currently the need is not terribly urgent, which gives me some time for
research. However, in 6-12 months the need might become urgent.
And, yes, I am now beginning to think about the Open exit...
On Monday 03 April 2006 11:00, B Sysprog wrote:
I have been asked to identify if it is possible to run an old,old
version of MVS/SP and DFP (3.2) on a zSeries processor (z890).
Perhaps is ISX/390 a possible solution for you? ISX/390 allows you to
run an old O/S as a virtual guest in an
I believe this is documented in the Redbook as a PIT strategy using
PTAM.
PIT = point in time.
PTAM = Pickup Truck Access Method. (It really says that!).
Missing from your strategy is POC = Point of Consistency. That is, your
PIT backups need to be taken at a POC where all related files (be
DITTO
Isaac Yassin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Staller, Allan
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z8 ???
My unconfirmed source says in the next month or so...
snip
Any crystal
Consider sub capacity pricing. Buy a bigger box than you need, pay for
what you use. Your bill grows (or shrinks) right along with your load.
Pluses include letting you pull large usage spikes without penalty.
Minuses include watching for and managing runaway tasks.
HTH and good luck.
Ditto, but with the caveat (rumored caveat that is) that the z8 boxes
won't go as small as the z890 boxes.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kopischke, David G.
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 11:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Dear Fellow Respirers,
Has anyone tried SHOWZOS v712? ...under z/OS 1.7?
If so, have you gotten any s0c1's when running it?
Thanks.
Ed Micucci
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
You are ignoring the root problem. Most likely, you are asking too much.
IMHO, complex operator duties are a management issue, not really a
technical one.
Set the objectives to lights out, automate every thing (to include the
light switches). Reduce operator duties to calling for help for
No, it simply means that all transport steps have to be binary, and you
have to somehow get the DCB right on the final step back to MVS.
A word of caution: do not use a Windows file suffix such as 'DOC'. No
matter what you say, Windows will ignore the 'binary' directive and
translate the file
The timing is the problem for me. I'm trying to hold off a z890 purchase so
our hardware doesn't go obsolete during shipment.
They've just (today) announced obsolessence of the z/900 (sales - June;
upgrades - October).
And, the z9 is upgradable from the z/990.
So, I wouldn't worry for awhile.
On 2006-03-30 at 15:05, concerning DB2 Question, WA Stout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to IBM-Main:
Is there a way (or tool) to reverse engineer a plan to get a DBRM
member? Some of our DBRM's have gotten corrupted and I want to
recreate without having to recompile.
DBRM's are simply (almost
Do you have a link to the letter?
Dennis Roach
United Space Alliance
600 Gemini Avenue
Mail Code USH-4A3L
Houston, Texas 77058
Voice: (281) 282-2975
Page:(713) 736-8275
Fax: (281) 282-3583
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions expressed by me are mine and may not agree with my
Many thanks for all the replies on this.
Unfortunatly the system is outsourced and getting anything changed moves
at glacial speed. I'm stuck with what I've got, and that's the lot.
Let me see what I can find out about running REXX under OMVS. I think
maybe some sort of stub routine might be
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 13:43:53 -0500, Ed Micucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Fellow Respirers,
Has anyone tried SHOWZOS v712? ...under z/OS 1.7?
If so, have you gotten any s0c1's when running it?
Thanks.
Ed Micucci
--
For
According the unsolicited emails I have had the brazen temerity to open without
the written
permission of IBM's lawyers, we might expect a new system around 25 April.
There have been suggestions of a single-book system with 12 PUs - 8 of them
characterisable.
Up to four for operating system
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
The timing is the problem for me. I'm trying to hold off a z890 purchase so our
hardware doesn't go obsolete during shipment.
They've just (today) announced obsolessence of the z/900 (sales - June;
upgrades - October).
IMHO the announcement is quite irrelevant.
Do you use RMM?
Thanks,
Desi de la Garza
Systems Programmer
Bexar County Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 12:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
In a recent note, Ian Worthington said:
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 15:14:09 -0500
Let me see what I can find out about running REXX under OMVS. I think
maybe some sort of stub routine might be the order of the day.
As a confidence builder you might try:
rexec MVS /bin/extattr
IMHO the announcement is quite irrelevant.
The OP was concerned about his equipment going obsolete.
I was trying to point out that it's not a great concern.
Also, you'll find that in North America, obsolete equipment/software is
relevant.
There's a different economic dynamic, in most cases.
On Apr 4, 2006, at 7:57 AM, B Sysprog wrote:
Thanks to all the responders so far. I am afraid I was given no
information other than MVS/SP 3.2.2 and DFP 3.2. These products
are licensed (and running on some old IBM hardware, which has yet
to be identified) by a non-US company that we
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 3:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Support for MVS/SP 3.2.2 on zSeries???
snip
That is entirely a different matter.
It really
Ed,
why not posting me the PSW and register?
SHOWzOS 712 runs fine on R7 and R8.
Roland
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Micucci
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 8:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SHOWZOS v712
We recently migrated all our mainframe data to a new Hitachi storage array
(9990v). In the initial setup we defined in HCD base (3390B) and alias
(3390A) volumes with wlmpav=yes (for the aliases). On the storage array we
have Compatible PAV enabled.In WLM we have Dynamic alias management
What am I missing to allow dynamic management of
pav's?
Do you have I/O Priority Management turned on?
It seems basic, but without it two things happen:
1. Execution Velocity is calculated with only CPU values.
2. PAV is not dynamic.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal
I searched the archives for SVC screening posts and saw quite a few postings
regarding when to use it and what to use it for. What I am looking for (and
didn't find in the archives) is how multiple screening programs are
implemented. For example, what if products from different vendors want
Matt
There are a couple of things I guess I don't understand about this
process. In a normal situation, I have a hardware configuration that
was loaded from an IOCDS at POR, and an IODF that matches it. Then I
can activate a new IODF which is different from the currently loaded
config,
If you mean the old
save-the-current-address-and-stick-my-address-in-the-table-and-then-pass-con
trol-to-the-old-routine-when-I'm-done-with-it method...
A product that utilizes SVC screening should check to see if screening is
already in place, i.e., the existence of a screening table in the TCB.
Ron,
Well it is, i think.. (its been a long day!).. I suppose what i was
trying to get at is that specifying CNTLUNUIT=3990 vs 2105 doesnt do
anything different (apart from HCD only allows D/t 3390A/B for 2105..)
All other control unit function/feature is queried during IPL (RDC and
other
I don't have PAV on my 9980V but I just looked at the HSP 600 we installed on
Sunday. I've also got it set to 192 bases and 64 aliases in each control unit.
What I see is that when the box is at rest, only the first 64 bases have an
alias assigned. I dragged out my test program that
Actually, 2. is incorrect. From the z/OS 1.7 WLM Planning book:
IMPORTANT: If you enable dynamic alias management, you must also enable I/O
priority management. So you need to specify yes for both of these
options on the panel. If I/O priority management is set to no, you will get only
the
So I think WLM is doing its thing, just not immediately.
The PAV assignment is not immediate.
I decide to (de-)allocate one, I don't do it until the next interval.
I then don't look at that volume for 3 intervals.
These are WLM intervals -- 10 seconds (clock) each.
2 years ago, I had a problem
This means that WLM will make alias moves that minimize overall IOS queueing,
but these moves will not take service class goals into consideration.
TOMAY-TOE
TOMAW-TOE
That is a difference that makes no difference.
And, a difference that makes no difference is no difference.
If I'm not
IIRC a z890 will only run a OS in 64-bit mode, no 31-bit mode, in an
LPAR. It may be possible to run a non-64-bit OS under z/VM.
Actually that's not the issue. There are lots of currently supported
31-bit operating systems that'll run just fine on a z890 including
VSE/ESA, z/VSE, TPF/ESA,
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
This means that WLM will make alias moves that minimize overall IOS queueing,
but these moves will not take service class goals into consideration.
TOMAY-TOE
TOMAW-TOE
That is a difference that makes no difference.
And, a difference that makes no difference is no
Roy,
Yes it is.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roy Hewitt
Sent: Wednesday, 5 April 2006 6:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 2105 Question
Ron,
Well it is, i think.. (its been a long day!).. I
The point is that someone observing the storage array's behavior, like Dennis,
should see aliases move regardless of the setting.
But, what is required is something addressing goals.
And, the OP was seeing nothing.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
On 29 Mar 2006 15:04:27 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Willingham) wrote:
I have a VSAM file that is used in CICS. The region is down and we are
trying to restore the file but it will not restore because it is flagged
as open for update by multiple users. How do you
Bill,
The 3990-6 accepts PPRC commands, but you cannot specify the LSS parm.
For the 3990 to accept the LSS parm it would have to support Logical
SubSystems. I don't think that has happened.
The Advanced Copy Services Manual states:
Note: LSS number is required if the storage control supports
Nothing in their indexes that I could find.
Porowski, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anything on www.bitsavers.org ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
On Apr 4, 2006, at 3:55 PM, McKown, John wrote:
SNIP---
Yeah. I hope like the blazes that they don't have IMS. We had a sister
company with IMS/DB that they used in CICS. Getting them up to date on
IMS so that they could get up to date on CICS and z/OS was
96 matches
Mail list logo
