William H. Blair wrote:
Arthur T. wrote
You don't mention the CI size.
He does not need to. Gilbert Cardenas wrote:
LINEAR -
which means that it will have a CISIZE of 4 KB (4096).
There are exactly 180 4K blocks (CIs) in each 3390 CYL.
All LINEAR cluster space allo
O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] wrote:
And when was the last time you used non-3390 geometry?
The device independence was important back in the early days of VSAM, circa 1975 when you had 3330s, 3350, 3340s on the floor, which were then followed by 3380s and 3390s.
Assuming that 3390 geometr
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 04/17/2008
01:05:29 AM:
> thanks for fixing the time stamp!
The thanks for that one should go to Ralph Sharpe.
> I looked at RMF M3, at the storage statistics, in particular the
> working set size:
> 18:36:30 234
> 18:37:00 19097 (60%delay, of this
When Bill says...
> You are correct. I was assuming that nobody had (and
> the original poster had NOT) done anything really
> inappropriate. For any CISIZE past 16KB you get into
> diminishing returns on a 3390, capacity-wise. There
> is almost never any good reason to specify a CISIZE
> for a LIN
Hi Jim,
thanks for fixing the time stamp! I think this time around it was somewhere
else than last time.
I looked at RMF M3, at the storage statistics, in particular the working set
size:
18:36:30 234
18:37:00 19097 (60%delay, of this 27%common, 33% locl, 33% other)
18:37:30 70784 (57%delay,
I forgot one: IBM ShopzSeries. ShopzSeries provides electronic delivery of
System z software, and it is available in many countries. (The online
Passport Advantage system provides electronic delivery of IBM software for
Linux on System z.) IBM keeps adding countries as time marches on. I think
we'r
Text attachments are allowed. Non-text attachments will be rejected.
Darren
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Eric Bielefeld wrote:
>Since when has IBM-Main allowed attachements. This is the first time I've
>ever seen one.
>
>Eric
--
For
Does anybody know where I can find a description of options
available for IPCS's CTRACE formatter for COMP=GSKSRVR - the
System SSL CTRACE? I know about the CTRACE subcommands parms
like FULL / SUMMARY (and as far as I can tell, FULL and SUMMARY
produce exactly the same reports for GSKSRVR unde
David W. O'Brien wrote:
> So a Linear dataset will have a Cisize that is a
> multiple of 4096, not an absolute value of 4096.
You are correct. I was assuming that nobody had (and
the original poster had NOT) done anything really
inappropriate. For any CISIZE past 16KB you get into
diminishing r
The following is from the AMS manual concerning CISIZE for Linear datasets:
" For a linear data set, the size
specified is rounded up to 4096 if specified as 4096 or less. It
is rounded to the next higher multiple of 4096 if specified as
greater than 4096."
So a Linear dataset will have a Ci
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
> 04/15/2008
>at 01:16 PM, "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >I am writing a TSO command processor. One option is to direct output to a
> >dataset. In support of this, for new datasets, I would like t
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
04/15/2008
at 01:16 PM, "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I am writing a TSO command processor. One option is to direct output to a
>dataset. In support of this, for new datasets, I would like to support
>the parms LIKE(existing.ds.name) and USING(attr-list).
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 04/15/2008
at 02:36 PM, Daniel McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>dinosaurs and chickens can coexist and each has a role to play.
We differ as to what those roles are.
>I don't word process in Script
That's unfortunate, because I find it to be more user friendly
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
04/15/2008
at 07:05 PM, "Craddock, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>None that can be discussed in polite company :-)
What if the discussion simply states that the details are in the part of
the PMR that only IBM can see and that I won't discuss them until the fix
ha
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
04/15/2008
at 01:52 PM, "Savor, Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I understand that you guys are very smart folks, but you guys LOVE to
>point all problems at application folks
Perhaps at your shop, alhough I doubt it.
>its tiresome.
What's tiresome is people who pre
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
04/15/2008
at 06:19 PM, Lindy Mayfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>__ Call an SVC that flips the JSCBAUTH bit back on. This is
>non-standard. If it is to be implemented even on a development system
>then added security needs to be built in to make sure it isn't misus
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 04/16/2008
03:38:13 AM:
> after setting GRSQ to CONTENTION (IBM default) and fortunately Q=NO,
> too, NDM proved true to prediction and dumped again in production
> with an 'already fixed' problem :-)
>
> But: Here's the relevant part of the dump statisti
As far as I know the OAM MOVEVOL command is the only standard utility
provided to change the location of a set of objects but that is a move of
the objects not a copy. It would be possible to write a program to query
the DB2 OAM tables and determine the names of the objects on the optical
volume a
2008/4/16 David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It'd still be nice to have something on Linux that understands 1403
> listings, though.
lpd...?
Tony H.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send emai
Hello,
Is anyone using PGP Command Line 9.0 for Mainframes from PGP
Corporation? Does it require a Linux partition or is it installed as a
Unix Systems Services application? (or something else?)
The tech specifications on their website says that one of the platforms
supported is IBM zSeries
Hans Visser wrote:
> Walt,
>
> i don't think you're right.
>
> he is looping from the end of the buffer to the beginning.
>
> SRCHLOOP CRR7,R8start of buffer reached?
>BEFINALyes, exit
>CLC 0(R9,R8),FILT
I have a question is there a way to make a copy of a Optical platter using
OAM. We have 3995 optical drives.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GE
Russell Witt wrote:
That will work just fine Mark, if your DR site is dedicated to you and you
have a running system there that is not recovered from your DR tapes
themselves. If your DR is running at a Sunguard/IBM shared DR recovery site,
then that will not work. In that case, you will have to
Arthur T. wrote
> You don't mention the CI size.
He does not need to. Gilbert Cardenas wrote:
>LINEAR -
which means that it will have a CISIZE of 4 KB (4096).
There are exactly 180 4K blocks (CIs) in each 3390 CYL.
All LINEAR cluster space allocation calculations can b
dbx has supported 64-bit code since z/OS V1R6. It's also a 64-bit
native application.
Timothy Sipples wrote:
Side note: Another dividing line for the debuggers seems to be whether they
support 64-bit code or not. z/XDC and IBM Debug Tool do, to pick two
examples. So I would advise the origina
Walt,
i don't think you're right.
he is looping from the end of the buffer to the beginning.
SRCHLOOP CRR7,R8start of buffer reached?
BEFINALyes, exit
CLC 0(R9,R8),FILTER 'filter(
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:15:32 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote:
>On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:46:49 -0500, Paul Whelan wrote:
>
>>I'm trying to use the RACF command exit IRREVX01 to limit the types of
>>searches submitted through a z/OS LDAP server and am seeing some very
>>strange behaviour that I can't unders
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:46:49 -0500, Paul Whelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm trying to use the RACF command exit IRREVX01 to limit the types of
>searches submitted through a z/OS LDAP server and am seeing some very
>strange behaviour that I can't understand. If I tell the exit to reject any
>se
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:44:38 -0700, Schwarz, Barry wrote:
>While Microsoft is closer to Bellevue than it is to the Pacific Ocean,
>it is no more in the former than it is on the shore of the latter.
>
>I wonder who should be more offended: the city of Bellevue whom you
>accuse of harboring the evil
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:27:07 -0400, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Gil,
>
>Is it only the one file that you have this problem with?
>
>
>
>
>
>Actually, I don't disagree either. We have always used tracks/cylinders for
>allocation and
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:28:00 -0700, Edward Jaffe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>> Ah! "colony address spaces"; plural. Will OMVS create additional
>> colony address spaces as hundreds of filesystems are mounted, as
>> needed to avoid system limits on TIOT size, etc.?
>>
>
>Th
On 16 Apr 2008 10:28:21 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gilbert Cardenas) wrote:
Hello everyone, I have an unknown that I have not been
able to figure out or at least I don't know where to look.
I have a user who is trying to define a vsam fi
While Microsoft is closer to Bellevue than it is to the Pacific Ocean,
it is no more in the former than it is on the shore of the latter.
I wonder who should be more offended: the city of Bellevue whom you
accuse of harboring the evil empire or the city of Redmond whom you just
deprived of its lar
Gil,
Is it only the one file that you have this problem with?
Actually, I don't disagree either. We have always used tracks/cylinders for
allocation and have not had the urge or need to convert to other formats.
But considering the current problem I'm having
Eric,
My guess is that the ban on attachments was part of the package of LISTSERV
exits that Darren had to remove upon his retirement from the university.
Hopefully it will not become widespread!
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original Message
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:25:07 -0700 (PDT), in
bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What could account for the following IDCAMS output?
DELETE ('RACFID') ALIAS CATALOG('USER.CATALOG')
IDC3012I ENTRY RACFID NOT
FOUND
IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN C
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:02:33 -0400, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>And when was the last time you used non-3390 geometry?
>
>The device independence was important back in the early days of VSAM,
circa 1975 when you had 3330s, 3350, 3340s on the floor, which were the
And when was the last time you used non-3390 geometry?
The device independence was important back in the early days of VSAM, circa
1975 when you had 3330s, 3350, 3340s on the floor, which were then followed by
3380s and 3390s.
Assuming that 3390 geometry is here to stay at least from a logic
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:57:05 -0400, David Betten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I'd also ask if when you see the dataset using 3 times what the user
>requested, are you looking immediately after it's been defined or after
>data has been loaded into it? It might be extending once it's populated.
>
>
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:52:52 -0400, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>snip<
>Where in the manual did it tell you not to use Cyls? I've been using Cyls or
Tracks for years with no problem.
>
I was looking at the Access Method Services for Catalogs Chapter 14 page
142
I'd also ask if when you see the dataset using 3 times what the user
requested, are you looking immediately after it's been defined or after
data has been loaded into it? It might be extending once it's populated.
Have a nice day,
Dave Betten
DFSORT Development, Performance Lead
IBM Corporation
e
Additional info,
I found out where the default allocation is coming from (CDS base
configuration). Apparently, when they setup the SMS default configuration,
they setup the default unit to be 3390 and the default bytes per track to be
56665 :
Default Management Class : Default Device
Gilbert,
What is your device geomtery on your CDS BASE DISPLAY? For 3390 it should be
56664 bytes per track and 15 tracks per cyl. If it were set to 3380, I would
expect your allocations to be approx 20% smaller than requested.
Where in the manual did it tell you not to use Cyls? I've been us
Thanks Tom. I am actually posting from the web page this time, and I see the
place for attachments. I used to use the web page all the time, after P&H
Mining said I was getting too many emails. I found it hard to use, as it
sometimes was hard to find my place the next day.
Now I read most
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/15/2008
at 04:11 PM, Ed Finnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Basically 'text formatting languages' DCF adds GML tags and on into XML.
>Both way behind La Plume(MI) and La TeX(Stanford).
Don't confuse TEX, which is Donald Knuth's, with LaTEX, which is Leslie
Lampor
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 04/15/2008
at 09:33 AM, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I'll say in public: if IBM is willing to let me have the source for DCF
>and Bookie, I will port it to Linux for free. I want it for my own use,
>and I think there are others who feel the same.
ObColdDead
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
04/15/2008
at 03:55 PM, Tony Harminc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Is IBM DCF significantly different from the publicly available Waterloo
>Script?
Yes, even if you're talking about the chargeable[1] Waterloo Script. I
don't know whether they contributed the latter or w
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 04/16/2008
at 09:31 AM, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I've used both as well; the comparison is closer if you compare GML to
>DocBook; raw DCF is rather like raw troff macros; not for the faint of
>heart.
It's not that bad, especially if you write macros for
(IBM Mainframe Discussion List) wrote:
They can also do I/O without any allocation, TIOT entry, DD statement,
enqueue, open, etc. All they need is a UCB address, some CCWs somewhere, and
about 150 bytes of ECSA.
Of course ... using the low-level STARTIO interface. But, dynamic data
set
In a message dated 4/16/2008 12:28:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Authorized programs are not constrained by
traditional limits on TIOT size and 24-bit virtual storage. ...
Such programs can support literally hundreds of thousands of
simultaneous allocations.
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Ah! "colony address spaces"; plural. Will OMVS create additional
colony address spaces as hundreds of filesystems are mounted, as
needed to avoid system limits on TIOT size, etc.?
This should not be an issue. Authorized programs are not constrained by
traditional lim
Hello everyone, I have an unknown that I have not been able to figure out or
at least I don't know where to look.
I have a user who is trying to define a vsam file using IDCAMS as follows:
DEFINE CLUSTER -
( NAME(BLAH.BLAH.BLAH) -
LINEAR -
R
I too believe that 'reality will prevail'. But 'reality' is a complex thing
that includes *perception* as much as it does molecules and photons. The
truth is that the better mousetrap does not always win the day. Examples
abound. Not to mention the legions of Mac users who passionately believe in
t
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:45:34 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>
>>But this provokes an interesting question: If (as I believe) HFS data
>>sets are dynamically allocated in the OMVS address space (that's what's
>>cited when I try to delete one), isn't OMVS at extreme hazard of
>>impacting DVC
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:40:12 -0500, Eric Bielefeld wrote:
>Since when has IBM-Main allowed attachements. This is the first time I've
ever seen one.
Eric,
The ibm-main LISTSERV web interface (which many of us use) has allowed
attachments for quite some time now. I don't believe this rece
Paul,
Could you give us the output of the WTO?
Mvg,
Hans Visser
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Paul Whelan
Sent: woensdag 16 april 2008 16:47
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IRREVX01 strang
Since when has IBM-Main allowed attachements. This is the first time I've ever
seen one.
Eric
Paul Whelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>SNIP>
> The code is based on the samples in SYS1.SAMPLIB(RACEXITS) and is attached.
>
> Best regards
> Paul Whelan
--
Eric Bielefeld
Syste
--
Clark Morris wrote:
I finally am getting around to commenting on this.
On 23 Jan 2008 03:13:49 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
This is my $0.01...
If I get an engineer out on a call for a Cartridge drive, I expect the
following
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:28:25 -0400, John Eells wrote:
>Edward Jaffe wrote:
>
>> I created a file called 'MYUID.BASE' and used SYMBOLICRELATE to create
>> 'SYS1.ALIAS.OF.BASE'. In my environment, data sets starting with MYUID
>>
I have experienced that to fail (to my dismay) because there's
no symb
> On Tuesday, April 15, 2008, Edward Jaffe Wrote:
>
> Sheesh! I've never understood what some sysprog's think is so "secret"
> about the contents of parmlib. IMHO, UACC(NONE) for parmlib is more
> draconian paranoia than anything else. But, that's a discussion for
> another thread...
>
Ed,
I agr
I finally am getting around to commenting on this.
On 23 Jan 2008 03:13:49 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>This is my $0.01...
>
>If I get an engineer out on a call for a Cartridge drive, I expect the
>following:
>
>1. Well dressed, Easy to communicate my problem to.
Neat, yes but we
On 15 Apr 2008 06:56:28 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:01:51 -0700, Skip Robinson wrote:
> --
>>
>> Date:Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:01:51 -0700
>> From:Skip Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: SMF in System Logger
>>
>> In
-
You always believe that your every word is golden, and go ballistic when people
only quote the part that they are commenting on.
1. I'm probably going to regret responding.
2. I do not think my words are golden; I'm simply trying to clarify, since I
did
McKown, John wrote:
But much more difficult, at least for the programmers around here, than
a nicely formatted AbendAID dump. Which they look at in the ISPF dialog,
not on SPOOL.
So I guess my thought is, why would a __normal programmer__ want to use
IPCS? Especially instead of something like Ab
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:46:49 -0500 Paul Whelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>I'm trying to use the RACF command exit IRREVX01 to limit the types of
:>searches submitted through a z/OS LDAP server and am seeing some very
:>strange behaviour that I can't understand. If I tell the exit to reject any
:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:24:01 -0700, Jon Nolting
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Actually, there will be one less Amdahl'er next week when I move from doing
mainframe interoperability at Microsoft and start with IBM as a zITA in the
Pacific Northwest next week.
>
>Jon Nolting
>EPG Compete - CATM
>
>You always believe that your every word is golden, and go ballistic when
>people only quote the part that they are commenting on.
1. I'm probably going to regret responding.
2. I do not think my words are golden; I'm simply trying to clarify, since I
did not articulate my position well enough t
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:06:04 -0400, John Eells wrote:
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:28:25 -0400, John Eells wrote:
Extended aliases (those defined with SYMBOLICRELATE) don't work well
(i.e., at all!) for entries in the master catalog. Did you mean data
set al
On 16 Apr 2008 07:16:33 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don Leahy) wrote:
>> Every once in a while, we have time to waste - pulling up debugger
>> tools is as good of a way to fill that time as any.
>>
>
>If a debugging tool is seen as a "waste of time" it is usually because
>the installation hasn't p
Hello,
I'm trying to use the RACF command exit IRREVX01 to limit the types of
searches submitted through a z/OS LDAP server and am seeing some very
strange behaviour that I can't understand. If I tell the exit to reject any
search command containing FILTER(*) the exit works perfectly and if I tell
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:06:04 -0400, John Eells wrote:
>Tom Marchant wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:28:25 -0400, John Eells wrote:
>>> Extended aliases (those defined with SYMBOLICRELATE) don't work well
>>> (i.e., at all!) for entries in the master catalog. Did you mean data
>>> set aliases?
>>
Hi
I have an application which which is running from a HSM exit routine
and issue
an IXGCONN request=connect IXGWRITE and IXGCONN request=disconnect
evrything is fine, except a large number of console messages about
structure connect and disconnect
How can I avoid a number of IXC582I and
Actually, there will be one less Amdahl'er next week when I move from doing
mainframe interoperability at Microsoft and start with IBM as a zITA in the
Pacific Northwest next week.
Jon Nolting
EPG Compete - CATM
Enterprise Technology Architect
(425) 707-9334 (O)
(925) 381-2375 (M)
(425) 222-7969
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Howard Brazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:03:09 -0700, Paul Knudsen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>Every once in a while someone pulls up a debugger tool, intending on
> >>having that skill in our resume. But when we actually need to
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:28:25 -0400, John Eells wrote:
Extended aliases (those defined with SYMBOLICRELATE) don't work well
(i.e., at all!) for entries in the master catalog. Did you mean data
set aliases?
Really? In what way do you mean? I used them for an ISV product a
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 07:57 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
> So I guess my thought is, why would a __normal programmer__ want to use
> IPCS? Especially instead of something like AbendAID or Symdump or
> DumpMaster or ... ? Of course, I've now labelled everybody who uses IPCS
> as abnormal .
Recently
I have seen that same error, but in our case, one of the systems was being
ipl'd. After the last system came up, it went away. This message wreaks havoc
on programs that are checking for a specific number sequence being returned.
Bill
> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:54:11 -0500> From: [EMAIL PRO
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:28:25 -0400, John Eells wrote:
>
>Extended aliases (those defined with SYMBOLICRELATE) don't work well
>(i.e., at all!) for entries in the master catalog. Did you mean data
>set aliases?
Really? In what way do you mean? I used them for an ISV product a few
years ago and
Hello everybody,
1. We got a nice addition from Leigh Compton on how to optimize web
service invocations when the requester and provider programs are in the
same region:
http://cicswiki.org/cicswiki1/index.php?title=How_do_I_optimize_Web_service_invocations_when_the_requester_and_provider_programs
snipped
Oh, and I might also mention that our CEO doesn't give a ... whose
problem it was. He just wants it fixed so that the business can go back
to making some money and helping our customers. I think maybe he has the
right idea.
end
We allowed the users 4 weekends with 6 hour windows for te
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 8:33 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: COBOL / VSAM question.
[snip]
> From "the other side of the fence", it is equally tiresome w
DCF and Waterloo SCRIPT had a few differences in the interpretation of
the dot commands, so often macros written for one didn't work on the
other. Waterloo SCRIPT did support GML, but again, a slightly different
set of tags than DCF, so that documents written for one often looked
different on the o
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Savor, Tom
>
> >> And I dislike application folks who won't test in my sandbox then
> complain when
> >> things blow up the first few days after a roll-up.
>
> >> An impasse?
>
> That was the point.
>
> I underst
Edward Jaffe wrote:
However, when I experimented with this a while back, I found that it
worked as expected only when the HLQs of the base name and alias were
the same -- or more precisely -- expected to be in the same catalog.
I believe both the alias entry and the related object must be in
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:03:09 -0700, Paul Knudsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Every once in a while someone pulls up a debugger tool, intending on
>>having that skill in our resume. But when we actually need to debug,
>>we go back to the old way - displays in the code.
>
>Wasting time good for j
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 8:10 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Workable Mainframe Debuggers
>
>
> In
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
> 04/11/2008
>
Shane wrote:
>The rest of you never saw it - o.k. ???.
Mate, I'll be really honest... (I'm not a car salesperson or a lawyer)
I did saw that post sitting nice and warm on my wide laptop screen at IBM-
MAIN's web pages.
>I'd better go find another line of work :-(
No, you stay here on IBM
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:12:56 -0700, Edward Jaffe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Sheesh! I've never understood what some sysprog's think is so "secret"
>about the contents of parmlib. IMHO, UACC(NONE) for parmlib is more
>draconian paranoia than anything else. But, that's a discussion for
>another thr
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:56:29 -0700, Skip Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hot start is not adequate. Each member of the MAS will allocate 'things' on
>(often) every spool volume.
This depends on your SPOOLDEF FENCE settings. But the default will
cause the behavior you indicated.
Mark
--
Ma
Thanks for the reply Jim.
I will post the question on ISVCOSTs as well.
I'd hopes someone would say it was possible but expect IBM to tell me its
not.
When you say Workload Charging do you mean WLC/VWLC , as we currently do
use VWLC.
Regards
George
This e-mail is confidential and, if you ar
We have a similar problem using the "NETSAT" command ,
on some our LPARS while on the others it work OK .
The NESTAT commnand with parameters like "HOME", "DEV" or "ROUTE"
functions OK on all Lpars...
The output we get on the failing Lpars :
Command ===> netstat
I want to thank z/Journal for running "another Viewpoint". I want to know
what is being said about how folks can get off of the mainframe and convert it
to Windows or even run a mixed mode. By reporting what is being contended
and all in one place it make my life a bunch easier. Otherwise I woul
I would think ISVCOSTs would be appropriate for asking the question if IBM
gives discounts on MLC products. Answering exactly what one got as a
discount may over step the bounds on any talklist; particulars can always be
handled offlist. The answer I believe is yes if one negotiates. The "Art o
O.K., so the fact this (re-)appeared in my inbox probably indicates it
wasn't all that private.
The rest of you never saw it - o.k. ???.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 06:58 +0200, Barbara Nitz wrote:
> In my experience most people tend to have no clue how to use
> IPCS, much less how to use it to advantage, again much less how to
> figure out things from an sdump.
Uh-oh - sounds like I'm being dragged into this (again).
Damn.
I'd better
Wl,
after setting GRSQ to CONTENTION (IBM default) and fortunately Q=NO, too, NDM
proved true to prediction and dumped again in production with an 'already
fixed' problem :-)
But: Here's the relevant part of the dump statistics (some stuff snipped):
Dump was complete
Total dump captur
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:15:33 -0400 "Craddock, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
:>Binyamin said
:>> :>That's all I've collected so far. Are there more ways?
:>> DEBAPFIN
:>> SVC screening.
:>Pardon? Modifying the APF bit isn't going to do you any good in an
:>address space that is already ru
97 matches
Mail list logo