I will be out of the office starting 16-04-2008 and will not return until
05-05-2008.
Contact Niels Simanis (NSI).
FONT SIZE=1 FACE=Arial___
Vi goer opmaerksom paa, at denne e-mail kan indeholde fortrolig information.
Hvis du ved en fejltagelse modtager e-mailen, beder vi dig
Craddock, Chris wrote:
We're so used to having access to the keys to the kingdom that we tend
to forget that everyone else doesn't get them. IPCS for example; when
the system captures an SVC dump all of the available data (even fetch
protected data) is going to be laying around in the dump
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:15:33 -0400 Craddock, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Binyamin said
: :That's all I've collected so far. Are there more ways?
: DEBAPFIN
: SVC screening.
:Pardon? Modifying the APF bit isn't going to do you any good in an
:address space that is already running since
Wl,
after setting GRSQ to CONTENTION (IBM default) and fortunately Q=NO, too, NDM
proved true to prediction and dumped again in production with an 'already
fixed' problem :-)
But: Here's the relevant part of the dump statistics (some stuff snipped):
Dump was complete
Total dump
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 06:58 +0200, Barbara Nitz wrote:
grin In my experience most people tend to have no clue how to use
IPCS, much less how to use it to advantage, again much less how to
figure out things from an sdump.
Uh-oh - sounds like I'm being dragged into this (again).
Damn.
I'd
O.K., so the fact this (re-)appeared in my inbox probably indicates it
wasn't all that private.
The rest of you never saw it - o.k. ???.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
I would think ISVCOSTs would be appropriate for asking the question if IBM
gives discounts on MLC products. Answering exactly what one got as a
discount may over step the bounds on any talklist; particulars can always be
handled offlist. The answer I believe is yes if one negotiates. The Art
I want to thank z/Journal for running another Viewpoint. I want to know
what is being said about how folks can get off of the mainframe and convert it
to Windows or even run a mixed mode. By reporting what is being contended
and all in one place it make my life a bunch easier. Otherwise I would
We have a similar problem using the NETSAT command ,
on some our LPARS while on the others it work OK .
The NESTAT commnand with parameters like HOME, DEV or ROUTE
functions OK on all Lpars...
The output we get on the failing Lpars :
Command === netstat
Thanks for the reply Jim.
I will post the question on ISVCOSTs as well.
I'd hopes someone would say it was possible but expect IBM to tell me its
not.
When you say Workload Charging do you mean WLC/VWLC , as we currently do
use VWLC.
Regards
George
This e-mail is confidential and, if you
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:56:29 -0700, Skip Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hot start is not adequate. Each member of the MAS will allocate 'things' on
(often) every spool volume.
This depends on your SPOOLDEF FENCE settings. But the default will
cause the behavior you indicated.
Mark
--
Mark
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:12:56 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sheesh! I've never understood what some sysprog's think is so secret
about the contents of parmlib. IMHO, UACC(NONE) for parmlib is more
draconian paranoia than anything else. But, that's a discussion for
another thread...
Shane wrote:
The rest of you never saw it - o.k. ???.
Mate, I'll be really honest... (I'm not a car salesperson or a lawyer)
I did saw that post sitting nice and warm on my wide laptop screen at IBM-
MAIN's web pages.
I'd better go find another line of work :-(
No, you stay here on
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 8:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Workable Mainframe Debuggers
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED], on
04/11/2008
at 03:08
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:03:09 -0700, Paul Knudsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every once in a while someone pulls up a debugger tool, intending on
having that skill in our resume. But when we actually need to debug,
we go back to the old way - displays in the code.
Wasting time good for job
Edward Jaffe wrote:
snip
However, when I experimented with this a while back, I found that it
worked as expected only when the HLQs of the base name and alias were
the same -- or more precisely -- expected to be in the same catalog.
I believe both the alias entry and the related object must
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Savor, Tom
And I dislike application folks who won't test in my sandbox then
complain when
things blow up the first few days after a roll-up.
An impasse?
That was the point.
I understand that you guys
DCF and Waterloo SCRIPT had a few differences in the interpretation of
the dot commands, so often macros written for one didn't work on the
other. Waterloo SCRIPT did support GML, but again, a slightly different
set of tags than DCF, so that documents written for one often looked
different on the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 8:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: COBOL / VSAM question.
[snip]
From the other side of the fence, it is equally tiresome when you
snipped
Oh, and I might also mention that our CEO doesn't give a ... whose
problem it was. He just wants it fixed so that the business can go back
to making some money and helping our customers. I think maybe he has the
right idea.
end
We allowed the users 4 weekends with 6 hour windows for
Hello everybody,
1. We got a nice addition from Leigh Compton on how to optimize web
service invocations when the requester and provider programs are in the
same region:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:28:25 -0400, John Eells wrote:
Extended aliases (those defined with SYMBOLICRELATE) don't work well
(i.e., at all!) for entries in the master catalog. Did you mean data
set aliases?
Really? In what way do you mean? I used them for an ISV product a few
years ago and
I have seen that same error, but in our case, one of the systems was being
ipl'd. After the last system came up, it went away. This message wreaks havoc
on programs that are checking for a specific number sequence being returned.
Bill
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:54:11 -0500 From: [EMAIL
Actually, there will be one less Amdahl'er next week when I move from doing
mainframe interoperability at Microsoft and start with IBM as a zITA in the
Pacific Northwest next week.
Jon Nolting
EPG Compete - CATM
Enterprise Technology Architect
(425) 707-9334 (O)
(925) 381-2375 (M)
(425)
Hi
I have an application which which is running from a HSM exit routine
and issue
an IXGCONN request=connect IXGWRITE and IXGCONN request=disconnect
evrything is fine, except a large number of console messages about
structure connect and disconnect
How can I avoid a number of IXC582I and
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 07:57 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
So I guess my thought is, why would a __normal programmer__ want to use
IPCS? Especially instead of something like AbendAID or Symdump or
DumpMaster or ... ? Of course, I've now labelled everybody who uses IPCS
as abnormal grin.
Recently
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Howard Brazee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:03:09 -0700, Paul Knudsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every once in a while someone pulls up a debugger tool, intending on
having that skill in our resume. But when we actually need to debug,
we
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:28:25 -0400, John Eells wrote:
Extended aliases (those defined with SYMBOLICRELATE) don't work well
(i.e., at all!) for entries in the master catalog. Did you mean data
set aliases?
Really? In what way do you mean? I used them for an ISV product a
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:06:04 -0400, John Eells wrote:
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:28:25 -0400, John Eells wrote:
Extended aliases (those defined with SYMBOLICRELATE) don't work well
(i.e., at all!) for entries in the master catalog. Did you mean data
set aliases?
Really? In
Hello,
I'm trying to use the RACF command exit IRREVX01 to limit the types of
searches submitted through a z/OS LDAP server and am seeing some very
strange behaviour that I can't understand. If I tell the exit to reject any
search command containing FILTER(*) the exit works perfectly and if I
On 16 Apr 2008 07:16:33 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don Leahy) wrote:
Every once in a while, we have time to waste - pulling up debugger
tools is as good of a way to fill that time as any.
soapbox
If a debugging tool is seen as a waste of time it is usually because
the installation hasn't put
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:24:01 -0700, Jon Nolting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, there will be one less Amdahl'er next week when I move from doing
mainframe interoperability at Microsoft and start with IBM as a zITA in the
Pacific Northwest next week.
Jon Nolting
EPG Compete - CATM
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:46:49 -0500 Paul Whelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:I'm trying to use the RACF command exit IRREVX01 to limit the types of
:searches submitted through a z/OS LDAP server and am seeing some very
:strange behaviour that I can't understand. If I tell the exit to reject any
You always believe that your every word is golden, and go ballistic when
people only quote the part that they are commenting on.
1. I'm probably going to regret responding.
2. I do not think my words are golden; I'm simply trying to clarify, since I
did not articulate my position well enough to
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:06:04 -0400, John Eells wrote:
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:28:25 -0400, John Eells wrote:
Extended aliases (those defined with SYMBOLICRELATE) don't work well
(i.e., at all!) for entries in the master catalog. Did you mean data
set
McKown, John wrote:
But much more difficult, at least for the programmers around here, than
a nicely formatted AbendAID dump. Which they look at in the ISPF dialog,
not on SPOOL.
So I guess my thought is, why would a __normal programmer__ want to use
IPCS? Especially instead of something like
-snip
You always believe that your every word is golden, and go ballistic when people
only quote the part that they are commenting on.
1. I'm probably going to regret responding.
2. I do not think my words are golden; I'm simply trying to clarify, since I
On 15 Apr 2008 06:56:28 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:01:51 -0700, Skip Robinson wrote:
--
Date:Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:01:51 -0700
From:Skip Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SMF in System Logger
In the absence of
I finally am getting around to commenting on this.
On 23 Jan 2008 03:13:49 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
This is my $0.01...
If I get an engineer out on a call for a Cartridge drive, I expect the
following:
1. Well dressed, Easy to communicate my problem to.
Neat, yes but well
On Tuesday, April 15, 2008, Edward Jaffe Wrote:
Sheesh! I've never understood what some sysprog's think is so secret
about the contents of parmlib. IMHO, UACC(NONE) for parmlib is more
draconian paranoia than anything else. But, that's a discussion for
another thread...
Ed,
I agree and
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:28:25 -0400, John Eells wrote:
Edward Jaffe wrote:
I created a file called 'MYUID.BASE' and used SYMBOLICRELATE to create
'SYS1.ALIAS.OF.BASE'. In my environment, data sets starting with MYUID
I have experienced that to fail (to my dismay) because there's
no symbol in
-snip-
Clark Morris wrote:
I finally am getting around to commenting on this.
On 23 Jan 2008 03:13:49 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
This is my $0.01...
If I get an engineer out on a call for a Cartridge drive, I expect the
Since when has IBM-Main allowed attachements. This is the first time I've ever
seen one.
Eric
Paul Whelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
SNIP
The code is based on the samples in SYS1.SAMPLIB(RACEXITS) and is attached.
Best regards
Paul Whelan
--
Eric Bielefeld
Systems
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:40:12 -0500, Eric Bielefeld wrote:
Since when has IBM-Main allowed attachements. This is the first time I've
ever seen one.
Eric,
The ibm-main LISTSERV web interface (which many of us use) has allowed
attachments for quite some time now. I don't believe this
Paul,
Could you give us the output of the WTO?
Mvg,
Hans Visser
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Paul Whelan
Sent: woensdag 16 april 2008 16:47
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IRREVX01
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:45:34 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
But this provokes an interesting question: If (as I believe) HFS data
sets are dynamically allocated in the OMVS address space (that's what's
cited when I try to delete one), isn't OMVS at extreme hazard of
impacting DVC etc.
I too believe that 'reality will prevail'. But 'reality' is a complex thing
that includes *perception* as much as it does molecules and photons. The
truth is that the better mousetrap does not always win the day. Examples
abound. Not to mention the legions of Mac users who passionately believe in
Hello everyone, I have an unknown that I have not been able to figure out or
at least I don't know where to look.
I have a user who is trying to define a vsam file using IDCAMS as follows:
DEFINE CLUSTER -
( NAME(BLAH.BLAH.BLAH) -
LINEAR -
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Ah! colony address spaces; plural. Will OMVS create additional
colony address spaces as hundreds of filesystems are mounted, as
needed to avoid system limits on TIOT size, etc.?
This should not be an issue. Authorized programs are not constrained by
traditional
In a message dated 4/16/2008 12:28:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Authorized programs are not constrained by
traditional limits on TIOT size and 24-bit virtual storage. ...
Such programs can support literally hundreds of thousands of
simultaneous allocations.
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 04/16/2008
at 09:31 AM, David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I've used both as well; the comparison is closer if you compare GML to
DocBook; raw DCF is rather like raw troff macros; not for the faint of
heart.
It's not that bad, especially if you write macros for your
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 04/15/2008
at 09:33 AM, David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'll say in public: if IBM is willing to let me have the source for DCF
and Bookie, I will port it to Linux for free. I want it for my own use,
and I think there are others who feel the same.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
04/15/2008
at 03:55 PM, Tony Harminc [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is IBM DCF significantly different from the publicly available Waterloo
Script?
Yes, even if you're talking about the chargeable[1] Waterloo Script. I
don't know whether they contributed the latter or
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/15/2008
at 04:11 PM, Ed Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Basically 'text formatting languages' DCF adds GML tags and on into XML.
Both way behind La Plume(MI) and La TeX(Stanford).
Don't confuse TEX, which is Donald Knuth's, with LaTEX, which is Leslie
Lamport's.
Thanks Tom. I am actually posting from the web page this time, and I see the
place for attachments. I used to use the web page all the time, after Pamp;H
Mining said I was getting too many emails. I found it hard to use, as it
sometimes was hard to find my place the next day.
Now I read
Gilbert,
What is your device geomtery on your CDS BASE DISPLAY? For 3390 it should be
56664 bytes per track and 15 tracks per cyl. If it were set to 3380, I would
expect your allocations to be approx 20% smaller than requested.
Where in the manual did it tell you not to use Cyls? I've been
Additional info,
I found out where the default allocation is coming from (CDS base
configuration). Apparently, when they setup the SMS default configuration,
they setup the default unit to be 3390 and the default bytes per track to be
56665 :
Default Management Class : Default
I'd also ask if when you see the dataset using 3 times what the user
requested, are you looking immediately after it's been defined or after
data has been loaded into it? It might be extending once it's populated.
Have a nice day,
Dave Betten
DFSORT Development, Performance Lead
IBM Corporation
(IBM Mainframe Discussion List) wrote:
They can also do I/O without any allocation, TIOT entry, DD statement,
enqueue, open, etc. All they need is a UCB address, some CCWs somewhere, and
about 150 bytes of ECSA.
Of course ... using the low-level STARTIO interface. But, dynamic data
set
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:52:52 -0400, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Where in the manual did it tell you not to use Cyls? I've been using Cyls or
Tracks for years with no problem.
I was looking at the Access Method Services for Catalogs Chapter 14 page
142.
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:57:05 -0400, David Betten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd also ask if when you see the dataset using 3 times what the user
requested, are you looking immediately after it's been defined or after
data has been loaded into it? It might be extending once it's populated.
Have a
And when was the last time you used non-3390 geometry?
The device independence was important back in the early days of VSAM, circa
1975 when you had 3330s, 3350, 3340s on the floor, which were then followed by
3380s and 3390s.
Assuming that 3390 geometry is here to stay at least from a
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:02:33 -0400, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And when was the last time you used non-3390 geometry?
The device independence was important back in the early days of VSAM,
circa 1975 when you had 3330s, 3350, 3340s on the floor, which were then
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:25:07 -0700 (PDT), in
bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What could account for the following IDCAMS output?
DELETE ('RACFID') ALIAS CATALOG('USER.CATALOG')
IDC3012I ENTRY RACFID NOT
FOUND
IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN
Eric,
My guess is that the ban on attachments was part of the package of LISTSERV
exits that Darren had to remove upon his retirement from the university.
Hopefully it will not become widespread!
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original
Gil,
Is it only the one file that you have this problem with?
Actually, I don't disagree either. We have always used tracks/cylinders for
allocation and have not had the urge or need to convert to other formats.
But considering the current problem I'm
While Microsoft is closer to Bellevue than it is to the Pacific Ocean,
it is no more in the former than it is on the shore of the latter.
I wonder who should be more offended: the city of Bellevue whom you
accuse of harboring the evil empire or the city of Redmond whom you just
deprived of its
On 16 Apr 2008 10:28:21 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gilbert Cardenas) wrote:
Hello everyone, I have an unknown that I have not been
able to figure out or at least I don't know where to look.
I have a user who is trying to define a vsam
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:28:00 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Ah! colony address spaces; plural. Will OMVS create additional
colony address spaces as hundreds of filesystems are mounted, as
needed to avoid system limits on TIOT size, etc.?
This should not
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:27:07 -0400, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gil,
Is it only the one file that you have this problem with?
Actually, I don't disagree either. We have always used tracks/cylinders for
allocation and have not
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:44:38 -0700, Schwarz, Barry wrote:
While Microsoft is closer to Bellevue than it is to the Pacific Ocean,
it is no more in the former than it is on the shore of the latter.
I wonder who should be more offended: the city of Bellevue whom you
accuse of harboring the evil
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:46:49 -0500, Paul Whelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use the RACF command exit IRREVX01 to limit the types of
searches submitted through a z/OS LDAP server and am seeing some very
strange behaviour that I can't understand. If I tell the exit to reject any
search
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:15:32 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:46:49 -0500, Paul Whelan wrote:
I'm trying to use the RACF command exit IRREVX01 to limit the types of
searches submitted through a z/OS LDAP server and am seeing some very
strange behaviour that I can't understand.
Walt,
i don't think you're right.
he is looping from the end of the buffer to the beginning.
SRCHLOOP CRR7,R8start of buffer reached?
BEFINALyes, exit
CLC 0(R9,R8),FILTER
dbx has supported 64-bit code since z/OS V1R6. It's also a 64-bit
native application.
Timothy Sipples wrote:
Side note: Another dividing line for the debuggers seems to be whether they
support 64-bit code or not. z/XDC and IBM Debug Tool do, to pick two
examples. So I would advise the
Arthur T. wrote
You don't mention the CI size.
He does not need to. Gilbert Cardenas wrote:
LINEAR -
which means that it will have a CISIZE of 4 KB (4096).
There are exactly 180 4K blocks (CIs) in each 3390 CYL.
All LINEAR cluster space allocation calculations can be
Russell Witt wrote:
That will work just fine Mark, if your DR site is dedicated to you and you
have a running system there that is not recovered from your DR tapes
themselves. If your DR is running at a Sunguard/IBM shared DR recovery site,
then that will not work. In that case, you will have to
I have a question is there a way to make a copy of a Optical platter using
OAM. We have 3995 optical drives.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
Hans Visser wrote:
Walt,
i don't think you're right.
he is looping from the end of the buffer to the beginning.
SRCHLOOP CRR7,R8start of buffer reached?
BEFINALyes, exit
CLC 0(R9,R8),FILTER
Hello,
Is anyone using PGP Command Line 9.0 for Mainframes from PGP
Corporation? Does it require a Linux partition or is it installed as a
Unix Systems Services application? (or something else?)
The tech specifications on their website says that one of the platforms
supported is IBM zSeries
2008/4/16 David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It'd still be nice to have something on Linux that understands 1403
listings, though.
lpd...?
Tony H.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
As far as I know the OAM MOVEVOL command is the only standard utility
provided to change the location of a set of objects but that is a move of
the objects not a copy. It would be possible to write a program to query
the DB2 OAM tables and determine the names of the objects on the optical
volume
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 04/16/2008
03:38:13 AM:
after setting GRSQ to CONTENTION (IBM default) and fortunately Q=NO,
too, NDM proved true to prediction and dumped again in production
with an 'already fixed' problem :-)
But: Here's the relevant part of
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
04/15/2008
at 06:19 PM, Lindy Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
__ Call an SVC that flips the JSCBAUTH bit back on. This is
non-standard. If it is to be implemented even on a development system
then added security needs to be built in to make sure it isn't misused.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
04/15/2008
at 01:52 PM, Savor, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I understand that you guys are very smart folks, but you guys LOVE to
point all problems at application folks
Perhaps at your shop, alhough I doubt it.
its tiresome.
What's tiresome is people who pretend to
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
04/15/2008
at 07:05 PM, Craddock, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
None that can be discussed in polite company :-)
What if the discussion simply states that the details are in the part of
the PMR that only IBM can see and that I won't discuss them until the fix
has been
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 04/15/2008
at 02:36 PM, Daniel McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
dinosaurs and chickens can coexist and each has a role to play.
We differ as to what those roles are.
I don't word process in Script
That's unfortunate, because I find it to be more user friendly
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
04/15/2008
at 01:16 PM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am writing a TSO command processor. One option is to direct output to a
dataset. In support of this, for new datasets, I would like to support
the parms LIKE(existing.ds.name) and USING(attr-list). I can
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
04/15/2008
at 01:16 PM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am writing a TSO command processor. One option is to direct output to a
dataset. In support of this, for new datasets, I would like to support
The following is from the AMS manual concerning CISIZE for Linear datasets:
For a linear data set, the size
specified is rounded up to 4096 if specified as 4096 or less. It
is rounded to the next higher multiple of 4096 if specified as
greater than 4096.
So a Linear dataset will have a
David W. O'Brien wrote:
So a Linear dataset will have a Cisize that is a
multiple of 4096, not an absolute value of 4096.
You are correct. I was assuming that nobody had (and
the original poster had NOT) done anything really
inappropriate. For any CISIZE past 16KB you get into
diminishing
Text attachments are allowed. Non-text attachments will be rejected.
Darren
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Eric Bielefeld wrote:
Since when has IBM-Main allowed attachements. This is the first time I've
ever seen one.
Eric
--
For
I forgot one: IBM ShopzSeries. ShopzSeries provides electronic delivery of
System z software, and it is available in many countries. (The online
Passport Advantage system provides electronic delivery of IBM software for
Linux on System z.) IBM keeps adding countries as time marches on. I think
Hi Jim,
thanks for fixing the time stamp! I think this time around it was somewhere
else than last time.
I looked at RMF M3, at the storage statistics, in particular the working set
size:
18:36:30 234
18:37:00 19097 (60%delay, of this 27%common, 33% locl, 33% other)
18:37:30 70784 (57%delay,
94 matches
Mail list logo
