Here are some items that I found interesting.
1. WebSphere Dashboard Framework, already available for z/OS, now also
available for Linux on z:
http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/9/897/ENUS207-329/ENUS207329.PDF
Dashboard Framework lets you build attractive and useful Web dashboards,
e.g.
Pommier, Rex R. wrote:
Radoslaw,
Try F OMVS,SHUTDOWN instead. It works for me...
Yes, I've been using the above for quite few years. However I remember
times, when F BPXOINIT was the only option.
BTW: AFAIK F OMVS,SHUTDOWN do (close) more things than F BPXOINIT,
and it is required in order
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Ummm. Imagine the effect on a dusty JCL deck which said,
DD SPACE=(CYL,100). But perhaps not. ISTM that SMS or DYNALLOC
(or maybe even ISPF) sometimes adjusts my requested SPACE to
account for the difference between 3380 and 3390.
I believe there was a panel in the
TCAM is history
Maybe in Europe; IIRC, it's still marketted in the USA.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
Hi.
It is my recollection that when MVS/XA first came out the usual suspect
group of non-VSAM I/O macors (GET/PUT/READ/WRITE/CHECK etc.)
could not be issued when AMODE was 31.
Now-a-daze AMODE can be 31 when issuing these macros, and
this has been the case for years.
My question for those with
Hi Greg,
OPEN/CLOSE support AMODE 31 since DFP 2.3 (FMID HDP2230)
PUT/GET support AMODE 31 since DFSMS 1.1 (FMID JDZ1110).
This was the first release of DFSMS.
Roland
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Over the past year or so, I've seen various mentions of HFS with regard to it
being a poor way to store data in terms of disk space utilization.
Please can anyone tell me if that is actually true?
If I have a file that occupies 1GB file in 'normal' space, how much more disk
would I need to store
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 20:41:59 +1100 Greg Price [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:It is my recollection that when MVS/XA first came out the usual suspect
:group of non-VSAM I/O macors (GET/PUT/READ/WRITE/CHECK etc.)
:could not be issued when AMODE was 31.
:Now-a-daze AMODE can be 31 when issuing these
Roland Schiradin wrote:
Hi Greg,
OPEN/CLOSE support AMODE 31 since DFP 2.3 (FMID HDP2230)
PUT/GET support AMODE 31 since DFSMS 1.1 (FMID JDZ1110).
This was the first release of DFSMS.
Roland
Hmm, that would seem to put the non-SVC macro upgrade around
the SP4.3 to SP5.1 time frame.
Thank you all for your suggestions/recommendations.
I used this suggestion.
//JOBNAMEX JOB 'EJECT CART ',MSGCLASS=Q,NOTIFY=SYSUID,
// MSGLEVEL=(1,1),CLASS=A
//ARTRMM EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,REGION=0M,DYNAMNBR=10
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
-snip-
Actually, we don't speak Belgian over here.
We speak mainly Dutch or French and the Dutch word 'Dinges' is not really a
synonym for 'toppings'.
It's a word you use when you don't immediately find the right word for
something. English equivalents :
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Mulder) writes:
But actually it did not take decades, as the original release of
MVS/XA in 1982 functionally supported 16-way SMP. Of
I've spoken Flemish before. The Robitussin always cleared that up, though.
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 06:11:44 -0600, Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Isn't Flemish also used in some areas of Belgium? Or is it pretty much a
dead language? Do the Walloons have a separate language?
I would be reluctant to move to a 2 way from a uni and potentially cut my
rating by CP by half. I wouldn't want to be taking the calls when peak hits.
I'm not comfortable with taking a .2 second CPU transaction and making it
possibly a .4 second CPU transaction. Most likely there is also some
Hi
thank you for reading my post.
Can some one please let me know how much different is between deploying
an application into websphere application server installed in Z/OS and
an application server installed in windows or linux?
What are the main area of risks when we migrate from windows to
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007t.html#76 T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe
Monopoly
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007t.html#76 T3 Sues IBM To Break its
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John P. Baker
Using the current track size, the space on a volume can
theoretically reach
244 TB. If we use the full capabilities of ECKD
architecture, a single volume can accommodate 72,055 PB.
Who would live
Doug,
When you FTP'd the data set from the Windows machine to the z/OS
machine, did you either preallocate the target data set or specify the
data set attributes (LRECL, RECFM) with the QUOTE SITE command? The
z/OS FTP server defaults might not be right for the TERSED files.
A few months
One Jon Nolting wrote:
You might also want to check chapter 31 of:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/iea2a880/31.8?SHELF=EZ2ZO10J.bksDT=20070429011913
Jon Nolting
EPG Compete - CATM
Enterprise Technology Architect
Seems a few Technology Architects are popping up
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Marc Wambeke
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:17:44 -0500, Ed Philbrook
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dinges is Belgian(?) for the waffle toppings. He is Belgian.
EdP
Actually, we don't speak Belgian over here.
We
Hi,
Running z/OS 1.8 from ADCD on a FlexEs box.
We are about to enable remote external access to our z/OS system. Security
is lousy as it is. The network router does port forwarding for Telnet to our
z/OS system. That brings up the ADCD default login screen, which on its own
offers no
Hi everyone,
There were so many good ideas that I didn't send the letter. (Gosh, I
was sorely tempted though...)
I think it is a great idea to have many people sign it (which is why I
had And... And..) under my signature.
And to get Share involved it GREAT.
So... onwards, ever onwards.
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Support, DUNNIT
SYSTEMS LTD.
Hi,
Running z/OS 1.8 from ADCD on a FlexEs box.
We are about to enable remote external access to our z/OS
system. Security is lousy as it is. The network router does
port
I lobbied against getting rid of Roscoe, Wylbur was already gone, for the COBOL
developers a while back when management wanted to go purely TSO. At that time,
with storage resources at somewhat of a minimum, I just could not see getting
rid of Roscoe. We kept it but I still had my trials and
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 07:27:45 -0600 Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Running z/OS 1.8 from ADCD on a FlexEs box.
:We are about to enable remote external access to our z/OS system. Security
:is lousy as it is. The network router does port forwarding for Telnet to our
:z/OS
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:35:38 -, Phil Payne wrote:
IBM has already formally stated its position.
Except that they haven't. All information we have about IBM's supposed
position on Hercules is entirely based on hearsay. Prove me wrong. If it
isn't available online, you can send me a jpeg of the
Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John P. Baker
Using the current track size, the space on a volume can
theoretically reach
244 TB. If we use the full capabilities of ECKD
architecture, a single volume can accommodate 72,055 PB.
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:30:33 +0800, Johnny Luo wrote:
BINARY mode itself is not enough.
'quote stru r' is what you need.
Not necessary for TERSEd files. And of no help to the OP,
who now has the data only on the Windows server.
On Dec 6, 2007 11:33 AM, Doug Evans wrote:
system using FTP. For
One of the dialects of Flemish/Dutch is Afrikaans and that language is
alive and well!
Goeie dag. (Good day)
Corneel Booysen.
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
5050 Edgewood Ct,
Jacksonville, FL 32254
Phone: (904) 783-5517
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 04:06:58 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
However, if you specify allocation in terms of blocks blocksize, what does
it matter?
That's a BIG IF at a lot of locations.
I don't believe it was proposed that IBM end marketing of 3390 geometry;
only that an alternative be made
I have some money left in my book budget for the year. Anyone have any
suggestions on good books (in the IT topic realm, of course) they have seen
or heard of?
I'm thinking of these:
Everything Is Miscellaneous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder
(Hardcover)
Roger Bowler wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:35:38 -, Phil Payne wrote:
Where I *do* agree with you, on the other hand, is the futility of writing
to Sam Palmisano, coupled with the inadvisability of citing Hercules as
justification. However, both you and I have been known to be wrong in
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:28:59 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
When the GET/PUT macro was changed from an L to an SLR/ICM pair.
I've done no assembler programming lately. Do I read this as
maintaining the restriction that the control blocks referenced
must reside below the Line?
sigh We're
Maybe more to the point...we ... userscan help in the development
..supply real life enhancements if given the chance..
suggestions and etc..--like at share--does work...but comes slow...if we
had the opportunity to contribute REAL code changes I think a
much can come of it and also keep
Our old Cisco router does not contain VPN functionality.
As for changing application names, or, John Chase's suggested CICS
modifications, we want a universal solution above logging in to applications.
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 15:48:09 +0200, Binyamin Dissen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not activate
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roger Bowler
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 7:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:35:38 -, Phil Payne wrote:
SNIP
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Support, DUNNIT
SYSTEMS LTD.
Our old Cisco router does not contain VPN functionality.
As for changing application names, or, John Chase's suggested
CICS modifications, we want a universal solution above
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I've done no assembler programming lately. Do I read this as
maintaining the restriction that the control blocks referenced
must reside below the Line?
All control blocks pointed to by other control blocks via 24-bit
pointers must be below 16MB.
--
Edward E Jaffe
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Support, DUNNIT
SYSTEMS LTD.
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 7:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Forcing a userid and password prompt on session connect
Hi,
Running z/OS
Routers are pretty cheap - you can even take an old PC an use the Linux
Router Project or widely available Live CDs to roll your own that has
full functionality, including VPN access.
Some sort of VPN is really what you want if you are concerned about security
- simply password-protecting TN3270
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 09:07:24 -0600, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have the ADCD setup, you could implement Netview Access Services
(NVAS). If you don't have it already, you should be able to get it for
no charge through the PWD program.
Yep, it's there and to get it up and running
Hi, All,
Anybody know where CPU usage stats for an FTP session would be recorded?
I don't see them listed in the SMF118 or SMF119 record
descriptions..
I need to compare CPU consumption for FTP over SSL/TLS, with and without
ICSF running.
TIA,
-jc-
I think it is time to 'get tough' on this issue of
laptop mainframes. In the letter to Sam Palmisano
we should threaten a mass migration of mainframe
professionals over to 'Waffle Dinges.' (Will the
Waffle Dinges guy franchise out his business?).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Sebastian Welton
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 09:07:24 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
If you have the ADCD setup, you could implement Netview
Access Services
(NVAS). If you don't have it already, you should be able to
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 08:58:24 -0600 Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Our old Cisco router does not contain VPN functionality.
One more choice. Hang a windows machine (or something else that can do VPN)
off of the router (direct the VPN port to that machine) and enable VPN on
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:03:27 -0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
What you have said would be a very interesting thing to be
cross-examined in court. If, indeed, Hercules is NOT based on TIDA/TILA
(second one I don't remember), but is based on other NON-Confidential
information, then PSI et al, are in a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 9:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: CPU usage for FTP server
Hi, All,
Anybody know where CPU usage stats for an FTP session would
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Warner Mach
I think it is time to 'get tough' on this issue of laptop
mainframes. In the letter to Sam Palmisano we should threaten
a mass migration of mainframe professionals over to 'Waffle
Dinges.' (Will the
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 08:27:40 -0600 Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:28:59 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
:When the GET/PUT macro was changed from an L to an SLR/ICM pair.
:I've done no assembler programming lately. Do I read this as
:maintaining the restriction that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warner Mach
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 9:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly
I think it is time to 'get tough' on this issue of
On 5 Dec 2007 12:39:03 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick
O'Keefe) wrote:
Furthermore, no one even reported the disappearance of
20 cars.
...
Maybe they were not willing to admit why they had 20 car-loads
of cards in the first place. That's a LOT of cards to write notes on.
There was a society
On 5 Dec 2007 16:23:59 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Gould)
wrote:
Maybe they were not willing to admit why they had 20 car-loads
of cards in the first place. That's a LOT of cards to write notes on.
Paat:
I was thinking that they ended up as fuel for heating. I don't think
you could make
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roger Bowler
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 9:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly
SNIP
Looks like PSI have already spotted this angle: see
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
On 5 Dec 2007 12:39:03 -0800, Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
Furthermore, no one even reported the disappearance of 20 cars.
...
Maybe they were not willing to admit why they had 20
car-loads of cards
In a message dated 12/6/2007 5:29:22 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know how much, if any, of the underlying code had problems.
I remember changing the region size for IDCAMS and LKED with XA 'cause they
had been 'fixed'.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chase, John
Hi, All,
Anybody know where CPU usage stats for an FTP session would be
recorded?
I don't see
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:12:13 -0800, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IEF196I IGD103I SMS ALLOCATED TO DDNAME SYS00110
ICH408I JOB(AXR04 ) STEP(AXR04 ) CL(PROCESS )
OMVS SEGMENT NOT DEFINED
Anyone got this to work?
...
From
z/OS 1.9 MVS Programming: Authorized Assembler Services Guide
Does anyone know of a way to FTP the DUMP file back to a zOS system so it
is readable?
Using Windows as a client and z/OS as a server the following works for me for
tersed datasets (binary ftping in both directions):
ftp quote site lrecl=1024 recfm=fb blksize=6144
200 SITE command was
When I use DFDSS to download a volume or dataset(s) to be transferred to
another host, I always include BLKSIZE=32760 on the output file in DFDSS. Even
though DFDSS does not care, it does help my transfer process whether that is
NDM, XCOM, FTP.
If you terse the file you need to make sure you
- Original Message -
From: Doug Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 10:34 PM
Subject: FTPing of DFDSS Dump Files
I need to move on zOS system to another. My simply plan was to dump
datasets using DFDSS DUMP and then transferring
Thanks Gary (and others),
I think I forgot to mention though is that in this case, the DUMP data set was
not TERSED first- thus the problem
Thanks,
Doug.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
No, I'm going for the popcorn franchise for all those people watching
this play out.
Jon
snip
I think it is time to 'get tough' on this issue of
laptop mainframes. In the letter to Sam Palmisano
we should threaten a mass migration of mainframe
professionals over to 'Waffle Dinges.' (Will
Will you serve the popcorn with Dinges?
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:06:28 -0500, Jon Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I'm going for the popcorn franchise for all those people watching
this play out.
Jon
snip
I think it is time to 'get tough' on this issue of
laptop mainframes. In the letter to
Belated birthday greetings.
Hmm.
I grant you that untrammeled access to source code _can_ result in disasters.
But - IMO - user access to source code made ASP/JES3 (thanks, e.g., to
Rolls-Royce and Rank
Xerox) and many other products into what they are today. Would JES2/MAS have
been
Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
From
z/OS 1.9 MVS Programming: Authorized Assembler Services Guide
Chapter 31. System REXX
Neither the TSO=YES or TSO=NO environments support UNIX System
Services host commands.
That doesn't exactly explain why the lack of support should result
in that RACF error, but
I can guess who suggested this ...
Bet you can't. Entirely internal to Amdahl - remember I worked there seven
years and had
Amdahl as a client for another eight.
Looks like PSI have already spotted this angle ...
I posted that reference yesterday evening - do at least try to keep up.
The
Does any kind soul out there have a DISPATCH logon script for TPX ACL/E
language? I am running into issues and cannot seem to get my arms around a
solution. I have one user that seems to be already logged on but when we look
they are not logged on to DISPATCH. My script works for everyone
Phil Payne wrote:
Belated birthday greetings.
Hmm.
I grant you that untrammeled access to source code _can_ result in disasters.
Any example ?
OK, I'am aware of one: Wide open code could mean more holes/errors
disclosed. It also could mean more errors FIXED. Not to mention more
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 11:18:28 -0800, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Patrick! I looked all over the place for that official
statement! I've had a PMR opened with IBM since yesterday and even they
haven't even been able to tell me this yet!
It appears that System REXX does not
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 20:23:21 +0100, R.S. wrote:
Phil Payne wrote:
I grant you that untrammeled access to source code _can_ result
in disasters.
Any example ?
I think the key words in Phil's post are untrammeled and can. He went on
to describe the benefits.
--
Tom Marchant
I grant you that untrammeled access to source code _can_ result in
disasters.
Any example ?
Sure. The thousands of in-stream usermods that were written prior to XA, and
which greatly inhibited subsequent upgrades. I certainly agree that in the
early days usermods were written to overcome
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Shannon
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 1:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [spam] Open z/Architecture or Not
I grant you that untrammeled access to source code _can_
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 14:19:21 -0500, Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does any kind soul out there have a DISPATCH logon script for TPX ACL/E
language? I am running into issues and cannot seem to get my arms around a
solution. I have one user that seems to be already logged on but when we
On Thu, Dec 6, 2007 at 2:53 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], McKown,
John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
But isn't that a managerial failure, rather than a technical failure?
I don't see that as a failure of either group involved. At the time, many of
those mods were necessary, and the
On 6 Dec 2007 11:23:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (R.S.)
wrote:
I grant you that untrammeled access to source code _can_ result in disasters.
Any example ?
OK, I'am aware of one: Wide open code could mean more holes/errors
disclosed. It also could mean more errors FIXED. Not to mention more
Ron Wells wrote:
Maybe more to the point...we ... userscan help in the development
..supply real life enhancements if given the chance..
suggestions and etc..--like at share--does work...but comes slow...if we
had the opportunity to contribute REAL code changes I think a
much can come
Bob Shannon wrote:
Some, such as logical swap, were incorporated into MVS. Others, such as
the dual master catalog mod at a large US insurance company, proved to
be a nightmare to maintain and an even worse nightmare to remove.
AMEN Bob. Although usermods did have their up side, especially the
I can emulate the problem by using two different IDs to logon to TPX Sessions
and logging on with the same id in Dispatch.
So TPX Session one is logged on as USER1 adn TPX Session two is logged on as
USER2. I then logon to DISPATCH under both TPX sessions as USER1. This
creates the error
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 15:23:15 -0500, Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I can emulate the problem by using two different IDs to logon to TPX
Sessions and logging on with the same id in Dispatch.
So TPX Session one is logged on as USER1 adn TPX Session two is logged on
as USER2. I then logon
From what I can see, NVAS is not included wit ADCD. See:
http://dtsc.dfw.ibm.com/MVSDS/'HTTPD2.adcd.global.html
(readm18s)'#Header_4
Is that correct?
Jerry
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 09:07:24 -0600, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
In a message dated 12/6/2007 1:23:55 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I'am aware of one: Wide open code could mean more holes/errors
disclosed. It also could mean more errors FIXED. Not to mention more
suggestions to enhance it. What's better ?
Back when the
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Shannon) writes:
Sure. The thousands of in-stream usermods that were written prior to
XA, and which greatly inhibited subsequent upgrades.
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 22:28:56 +0900, Clement Clarke wrote:
There were so many good ideas that I didn't send the letter. (Gosh, I
was sorely tempted though...)
I think it is a great idea to have many people sign it (which is why I
had And... And..) under my signature.
And to get Share involved it
Hi,
I have an application which require a common dataspace. Not a big issue so
far but I don't want to start/write
a STC just to hold the CADS so I schedule a SRB to *MASTER* and create the
CADS undercover for this ASID.
This works also and I also provide a utility to delete this dataspace.
It is just odd that I only have one user that has this duplicate logon issue.
No one else here is reporting it.
I am trying to get more users on TPX. And hopefully we can see if this is
isolated or not.
Well, we have IPLs scheduled for this weekend so I will see if monday it is
cleared up.
are you a Top Secet shop? If so, check the parameters for the facility
involved, specifically
SIGN(M) or SIGN(S)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 3:51 PM
To:
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
Anne Lynn Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The OCO-wars (object code only) in the early 80s were somewhat
turbulent.
re:
Certainly OCO marched on, with IBM and the world the poorer for it.
I used to believe that until the memory of the number of usermods caused great
delays in upgrades and the implementation of new function.
I remember one ex-IBMer becoming an Operations Manager just about a year befor
XA was
Roland,
I have heard of other products that do this sort of thing - however it makes me
feel uneasy and personally I would try to avoid it. Your program that sneaked
in that CADS is never going to be above suspicion for any system problems when
an IPCS dump reveals it looking like some huge
--snip---
Furthermore, no one even reported the disappearance of 20 cars.
...
Maybe they were not willing to admit why they had 20 car-loads of
cards
in the first place. That's a LOT of cards to write notes on.
There was a society in
I have heard of other products that do this sort of thing - however
it makes me feel uneasy and personally I would try to avoid it. Your
program that sneaked in that CADS is never going to be above
suspicion for any system problems when an IPCS dump reveals it
looking like some huge zit on
Roland,
While the SRB to MASTER approach may be taken by a number of IBM
products (DB2 and RACF come to mind), for a vendor product, I would have
to agree with Rob and Shane, do it the right way, if only to save
yourself having to deal with calls from IBM if there is an abend in the
MASTER address
We are contemplating making a change to MCSOPER processing to prevent
user's from specifying a console that has been defined as a system console.
(By system console, we mean the operating system console facility available
through the HMC). The intent of this change would be to further protect
What you want to do is perfectly safe, (so long as nothing goes wrong :) ),
but the problem is that something always goes wrong, and you probably don't
want to get in the middle of the finger pointing that always happens when
something goes wrong.
The code to support it in a separate space is not
I have a problem with it.
How would you decide if the act/Deact was inadvertent? What is the
danger that you are trying to protect us from? I would imagine that being
authorized to act/deact ought to mean that you wanted to do it int he first
place. Imagine what the consequences would be
Rob,
well you're right unfortunally a new STC
1. Have to be documented
2. Added to automation
3. Require a migration path for existing user
4. The SRB routine was already coded and works fine
5. other issues
So using *MASTER* was much easier ok someone can say lazy.
Roland
Roland,
I
Wayne,
there is no code is in the MASTER asid. Just a SRB to create and delete the
CADS no more.
Roland
Roland,
While the SRB to MASTER approach may be taken by a number of IBM
products (DB2 and RACF come to mind), for a vendor product, I would have
to agree with Rob and Shane, do it the right
I am pretty sure that the zLinux stuff supports above the bar.
zLinux does not have neither a bar nor a line, does it? No need
for it; there simply is no legacy AMODE24 code which needs
compatibility support.
--
Peter Hunkeler
Credit Suisse
On Dec 6, 2007, at 8:03 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:30:33 +0800, Johnny Luo wrote:
BINARY mode itself is not enough.
'quote stru r' is what you need.
Not necessary for TERSEd files. And of no help to the OP,
who now has the data only on the Windows server.
On Dec 6,
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
