Frank, just to clarify, are these the ingredients for the new pattern:
1. Maintain the 3270 user interface paradigm;
2. Allow in-line or pop-up presentation of contextual information
(signature images) based on a field value (account number) displayed in the
3270 interface;
3. If possible,
I think all the Java 5 releases on z/OS were zAAP-enabled -- initial zAAP
support dates back to one of the Java 4 revisions as I recall. So one
indirect way to determine whether there's some relevant activity is to take
a look at RMF Monitor III and see what zAAP-eligible workload there is,
then
Hi, Lizette,
We are doing a similar proof of concept utilizing DLM with a DD back end.
Richard's comments about HSM data and deduping was very interesting and
helpful in determining what our expectations should be.
Could you please share your findings or any other information of interest
once
I've never really used it, but I have gotten some UNIX filesystem data
usage records out of RACF when the RACF user was UAUDIT. So it may be
possible to use the UNIX chaudit command to cause SAF (RACF) to produce SMF
records showing who used a file / subdirectory and when.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at
In 957ca5bb-6dc8-423f-a983-cc947c960...@yahoo.com, on 09/30/2013
at 01:11 AM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com said:
I wonder why the government chose Ada...?
First, it was designed under DOD auspices specifically for mission
critical work. Second, it's a much better language than most of
In 524900a1.40...@yahoo.com, on 09/30/2013
at 12:40 AM, Thomas Kern tlk_sysp...@yahoo.com said:
I like to account for four different types of service time for SLAs.
5. Environmental outages
a. Earthquake
b. Flood
c. Squirrel
d. War
Such environmental outages should not count
In 52491967.4070...@gmail.com, on 09/30/2013
at 02:25 PM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com said:
There is no doubt that Ada is a much, much better programming
language then PL/I, C, COBOL etc.
I could make a case for PL/I, and there are languages that are clearly
better than Ada for
In 4989582253241223.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
09/28/2013
at 09:59 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
I believe that with JCL I could readily allocate and KEEP a data
set with the actual name 'FORMAT4.DSCB' (but perhaps not catalog
it). But is that a reserved name
I remember
reading that Fred Brooks regrets that it wasn't the systems programming
language for OS/360. I suppose because it was a big, complex language
for the time it didn't quite make the cut.
I've always been kind of curious about that. I wonder if, although (since) it
was as you wrote
In college, I used the PL/1 F compiler on a 360/40 running PCP, circa 1971.
It was horribly buggy. Of course, I have no idea if the college kept
maintenance up to date.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of M Baker
Sent:
I recall a study many years ago with regard to which statistics tools was best,
among active statisticians, with many criteria
in the survey questions, that concluded that the strongest correlation was with
one single answer: What was your FIRST statistics tool used?
Barry Merrill
On Oct 2, 2013, at 8:32 AM, M Baker baker...@gmail.com
wrote:
I remember
reading that Fred Brooks regrets that it wasn't the systems programming
language for OS/360. I suppose because it was a big, complex language
for the time it didn't quite make the cut.
I've always been kind of
l...@garlic.com (Anne Lynn Wheeler) writes:
for the fun of it I did a rewrite in pascal of a major portion of the
VM370 kernel (done in assembler) ... and demonstrated it running
(faster) in virtual address space interacting with a smaller vm370
kernel. part of the issue was that mainframe
Barry,
GDDM ...then SAS
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Oct 2, 2013, at 9:47 AM, Barry Merrill ba...@mxg.com wrote:
I recall a study many years ago with regard to which statistics tools was
best, among active statisticians, with
One of the colleges I attended, 1977-78, used a Honeywell system running
Multics. PL/I was taught as well as IBM 360 assembler. I was told the IBM
assembler ran under an 360 emulator. The university did its own mods to the OS.
--- curtis@austin.utexas.edu wrote:
From: Pew,
Timothy Sipples wrote:
I think all the Java 5 releases on z/OS were zAAP-enabled -- initial zAAP
support dates back to one of the Java 4 revisions as I recall. So one
indirect way to determine whether there's some relevant activity is to take
a look at RMF Monitor III and see what zAAP-eligible
PL/1 and System 360 was a combined effort; OS/360, too.
The same way as the 360 architecture should make all other
platforms obsolete, PL/1 was supposed to make all other programming
languages obsolete. As we know today, the first goal was reached -
well, almost - but the second failed.
The PL/1
We have converted from host explorer to bluezone.
Both support scripting and macros and/or vb and .net for creating windows apps.
We have both vb and .net apps as well as scipts and macros that are launched
from the emulator.
You can contact me offline if you need anything more
Regards
One thing to remember about the more recent Java JVMs is that each release
improves its JIT compiler technology and will take advantage of the latest
instructions on the machine that it runs on. Over the years, these
improvements have really added up, and the latest Java SDK runs
substantially
I am aware of the ISPF LM functions.
I wonder if there is a native MVS or TSO command to easily do this.
There is delete pds(member), but that requires exclusive access.
There is IEHPROGM, but I would as soon just avoid it.
--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
Hello Tony,
I think, I have a description somewhere of the 1979 variant of P-Code used
in the Stanford compiler (scanned document). I'll send it to you offline.
The two passes of the compiler are written in Pascal, and the second one
generates 370 object code from P-Code; it writes the 80 byte
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 17:03:09 +0200, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
PL/1 and System 360 was a combined effort; OS/360, too.
The same way as the 360 architecture should make all other
platforms obsolete, PL/1 was supposed to make all other programming
languages obsolete. As we know today, the first goal was
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:14:15 +0300, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
I am aware of the ISPF LM functions.
I wonder if there is a native MVS or TSO command to easily do this.
There is delete pds(member), but that requires exclusive access.
There is IEHPROGM, but I would as soon just avoid it.
I believe
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
I wonder if there is a native MVS or TSO command to easily do this.
What about STOW and DESERV DELETE? Yes, they're macros, not commands, but I
think you can conjure a little program to us that.
There is delete pds(member), but that requires exclusive access.
That is
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 10:33:31 -0500 Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
:On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:14:15 +0300, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
:I am aware of the ISPF LM functions.
:I wonder if there is a native MVS or TSO command to easily do this.
:There is delete pds(member), but that requires
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 10:36:39 -0500 Elardus Engelbrecht
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za wrote:
:Binyamin Dissen wrote:
:I wonder if there is a native MVS or TSO command to easily do this.
:What about STOW and DESERV DELETE? Yes, they're macros, not commands, but I
think you can conjure a little
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:14:15 +0300, Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
wrote:
I am aware of the ISPF LM functions.
I wonder if there is a native MVS or TSO command to easily do this.
There is delete pds(member), but that requires exclusive access.
There is IEHPROGM, but I would as soon
Please look at is this way - with a little sense of humour:
IBM had with this architecture for some time (in the late 60s and in the
70s)
such a strong postion on the global computer market, that indeed almost
all other architectures were obsolete or niche platforms. Even here in
Germany,
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 10:48:49 -0500, Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:14:15 +0300, Binyamin Dissen
bdis...@dissensoftware.com wrote:
I am aware of the ISPF LM functions.
I wonder if there is a native MVS or TSO command to easily do this.
There is delete pds(member), but
Thanks Timothy! I will put these on the list of options.
(GDDM sounds very interesting, though perhaps too much in the way of
programming requirements on the z/OS side.)
Frank
From: Timothy Sipples sipp...@sg.ibm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent:
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
As this is all REXX, I am trying to avoid shipping a program.
Ah, now I understand. You can write a little REXX program. I was ready to post
it here, but you don't want a program
:Good. What about utilities and IDCAMS?
Great. Which one will do what I want?
Why not use
Greetings...
A colleague asked me the following question:
Is there a way to determine how many parameters are being passed into a
COBOL program?
I could show him in Assembler, but in COBOL, I wouldn't have a clue.
Can someone advise?
Thx,
Bob R
Is there a way to determine how many parameters are being passed into a
COBOL program?
It all depends on the convention you employ for passing parameters. The most
common is to pass the PARM string as a comma delimited string. So in the
simplest form, the number of parameters is the number
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Raupach, Robert E (CTO Architecture +
Engineering) rraup...@thehartford.com wrote:
Greetings...
A colleague asked me the following question:
Is there a way to determine how many parameters are being passed into a
COBOL program?
I could show him in
Assuming that the VL convention is used, if I recall my reading of cobol
compiler listings, using a lot of items in the PROCEDURE DIVISION USING and
then assigning the addresses one by one and stopping when the high order bit
is set.
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 16:36:04 + Raupach, Robert E (CTO
On 10/2/2013 10:36 AM, Raupach, Robert E (CTO Architecture + Engineering) wrote:
Greetings...
A colleague asked me the following question:
Is there a way to determine how many parameters are being passed into a COBOL
program?
I could show him in Assembler, but in COBOL, I wouldn't have a
Mark,
I'm curious - if the PDS is allocated with DISP=SHR, will IDCAMS use ISPF
compatible ENQs to serialize the member when deleting?
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:14:15 +0300,
This is of course for a COBOL BATCH MAIN program.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Roberts, John J
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 11:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Determining number of Parameters
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 11:05:34 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
As this is all REXX, I am trying to avoid shipping a program.
Ah, now I understand. You can write a little REXX program. I was ready to post
it here, but you don't want a program
:Good. What about utilities
On 1 October 2013 20:06, Bernd Oppolzer bernd.oppol...@t-online.de wrote:
And: it turned out, that the P-Code is not so machine-independant
as it should be. There will be some difficulties regarding character
sets etc., when I try to port the compiler to an ASCII based platform,
for example
On 10/2/2013 10:47 AM, Roberts, John J wrote:
This is of course for a COBOL BATCH MAIN program.
Whar do you mean by 'This'? Are you refering to your original
question or to the answer below?
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I was referring to my reply. The original question wasn't clear.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 11:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Determining number
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
The OP said he was concerned about the exclusive ENQ.
This is why I posted the documentation, but the OP said something otherwise.
I'm going to test it when I have free time.
Then Mark Z. suggested that preallocating the data set SHR avoids the
exclusive ENQ.
Is that
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 11:47:44 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
I'm curious - if the PDS is allocated with DISP=SHR, will IDCAMS use ISPF
compatible ENQs to serialize the member when deleting?
Do you like to gamble?
-- gil
--
For
Just a heads up.
IBMLink Outage Communication.
2 October 2013
In order to adopt IBMLink to Corporate Web standards and improve user
experience through a new rich look and fell, the application may not be
accessible during the following period:
The installation will be deployed starting on
Has anyone noticed lately that IBMLINK seems to be missing?
When I try www.ibm.com/ibmlink I get taken to a products upgrade page and I
have to hunt through several menu items to just find the SR Function.
I am still trolling through IBM.COm to find SIS, APAR, and so forth.
Thanks
Lizette
On 10/2/2013 1:27 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Just a heads up.
IBMLink Outage Communication.
2 October 2013
In order to adopt IBMLink to Corporate Web standards and improve user
experience through a new rich look and fell, the application may not be
accessible during the following period:
Try here:
http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/search/
Al Staller | Z Systems Programmer | KBM Group | (Tel) 972 664-3565 |
allan.stal...@kbmg.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent:
According to IBM marketing publications, parallel sysplex is designed to
provide 6 nines (99.) percent availability.
This represents about 31 seconds of down time/year.
This IBMLINK outage amounts to the expected down time in about 1400 years
(12*3600)/30.
IBM should be embarrassed.
This
Yep, I'll take works over pretty any time. Better would be if they put it up on
z.
Linda
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 2, 2013, at 10:45 AM, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com wrote:
According to IBM marketing publications, parallel sysplex is designed to
provide 6 nines (99.) percent
I use this link to get to IBMLINK:
https://www-304.ibm.com/ibmlink/servicelink/servicelink.wss?lc=encc=US
John Ayon | Technology Specialist | z/OS Server Technology
Meijer | Building 982 - 2 South | 2727 Walker Ave NW | Grand Rapids, MI 49544
Phone : 616-791-3623
john.a...@meijer.com
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 11:47:44 -0500, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
Mark,
I'm curious - if the PDS is allocated with DISP=SHR, will IDCAMS use ISPF
compatible ENQs to serialize the member when deleting?
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
In a word, no. But this is a
It would also be better if they subjected their messages to a little
proofreading; e.g., look and fell. But they were correct in categorizing the
new look as rich (one possible meaning of which is laughable ).
Bill Fairchild
Franklin, TN
- Original Message -
From: Linda
And adopt probably should be adapt.
Oh no! I scored an own goal. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
CROSS-POSTED to IBMTCP-L and IBM-MAIN.
Dear Networking Friends:
Is it OK to run more than one Sysplex Distributor in a Sysplex?
Thank you, Dave
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Dear REXX people,
I am trying to get the result from a GRS command into an array. We are
running z/OS V1R13 and the TSO/E REXX Reference shows some Examples. It
shows mcode = getmsg('dispmsg.','sol',,,120). So the stem dispmsg. will have
the solicited messages. I tried to get this EXEC
I use this one and it always seems to work:
https://www-304.ibm.com/usrsrvc/account/userservices/jsp/login.jsp?persistPage=truepage=/ibmlink/
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ayon, John
Sent: Wednesday, October 02,
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:52:27 +, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
dave.l.han...@usps.gov wrote:
Dear REXX people,
I am trying to get the result from a GRS command into an array. We are
running z/OS V1R13 and the TSO/E REXX Reference shows some Examples. It
shows mcode =
It is timing out waiting on the reply?
Change the 3 to a higher value on the GETMSG and see if it helps.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 2:52 PM
To:
W dniu 2013-10-02 18:36, Raupach, Robert E (CTO Architecture +
Engineering) pisze:
Greetings...
A colleague asked me the following question:
Is there a way to determine how many parameters are being passed into a COBOL
program?
I could show him in Assembler, but in COBOL, I wouldn't have
BTW: here's a Object-Pascal compiler based on LLVM project:
http://code.google.com/p/llvm-pascal/
(I think that there are more than one of these)
For info in LLVM: http://llvm.org/
IBM has reportedly become more interested in LLVM for z:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTM1MTc
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 11:00:35 -0700, Linda wrote:
Yep, I'll take works over pretty any time. Better would be if they put it up
on z.
Can they afford it? Perhaps if it could run in specialty engines.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN
Anybody else experiencing failures with STP/ETR dialout to NIST ACTS?
http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/grp40/acts.cfm
Cliff McNeill
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Government shutdown ?
Jerry Whitteridge
Lead Systems Programmer
Safeway Inc.
925 951 4184
If you feel in control
you just aren't going fast enough.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Clifford McNeill
Sent: Wednesday,
Hi,
You can check this http://www.cobug.com/cobug/forums/cobolLang/65.shtml where
they suggest a test for NULL against the address of a parameter.
That worked for me too some time ago.
Unless iterating through all parameters and checking for null there is no way
to count them at the language
Clifford McNeill wrote:
Anybody else experiencing failures with STP/ETR dialout to NIST ACTS?
http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/grp40/acts.cfm
Point a browser at that link.
Bob
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
THANK YOU!
I added the CONSPROF and it works:
CONSPROF SOLDISPLAY(NO)
CONSPROF UNSOLDISPLAY(NO)
address TSO 'CONSOLE ACTIVATE'
CONSOLE SYSCMD(RO *ALL,D GRS,C)
mrc = getmsg('CNSL.','SOL',,,3)
Do i = 1 to CNSL.0
Say i CNSL.i
If i // 20 = 0 Then Do
Say Press 'ENTER' to clear the
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 20:00:07 +, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
dave.l.han...@usps.gov wrote:
THANK YOU!
I added the CONSPROF and it works:
W dniu 2013-10-02 21:42, Clifford McNeill pisze:
Anybody else experiencing failures with STP/ETR dialout to NIST ACTS?
http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/grp40/acts.cfm
What's worse?
Using so obsolete, unreliable technology as dialout or using so
unreliable service provider as gov.us ?
Probably like many folks, I like to keep my jobs in SDSF sorted
chronologically. I have been noticing lately that they fairly often
mysteriously shift to being sorted by JOBID. No matter -- I just enter SORT
CRDATE and move on. I have been wondering what causes it, however.
I just now happened to
I think this might be your problem. Here's what I found in IBMlink:
The problem is with SDSF. The local fix is to issue SET CSORT OFF. CSORT
stands for cursor-sensitive sorting.
APAR PM59695 - PTF - UK77441 superceeded by UK79343 (neither ptf has been
received)
With CSORT enabled,
My first thought was that it could be related to CSORT, but I wouldn't expect
this
bug (nor any CSORT action) to update the saved variables for recalling commands.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:m...@mzelden.com
ITIL v3 Foundation Certified
I do not understand what I am doing wrong. I setup the following recovery
environment:
SETFRR A,FRRAD=FRRA,EUT=YES,MODE=FULLXM,WRKREGS=(R1,R2),
PARMAD=(R3)
STR13,0(R3)
I then caused my program to abend.
When my recovery routine is entered I ABEND with an S0C4 because R2 is
I recently worked a long and involved SR over RC=4 from GETMSG. It's way
worse than a 'warning'. RC=4 means
1. You got no data back in your stem variable. Nada. Nichts. Zip.
2. We're not going to tell you why. Dare you to guess.
As for SOLDISP and UNSOLDISP, they control whether 'solicited'
On entry R13 is undefined.
Also, R2 is pointing at the FRR entry - perfectly fine.
Try a SLIP to debug your FRR.
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:47:21 -0500 Donald Likens dlik...@infosecinc.com
wrote:
:I do not understand what I am doing wrong. I setup the following recovery
environment:
:
:SETFRR
Wow, thanks, that's got to be it.
I did seem to feel there was a correlation with exiting from browse.
Yup Mark, if I do a point-and-shoot sort on RECS and then a RETRIEVE, I see
SORT RECS A.
Googling CSORT I find Mark with the same problem on April 10, 2012.
I tried re-creating
Hi Folks,
A side note - I did this set command and my hi-lighting of fields (on my
ISPF DA panel) has returned. I'd been wondering what had happened. Changed
default between z/OS 1.11 and z/OS 1.13? Hmmm.
Thanks!
BobL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On 1 Oct 2013 08:01:35 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:52:16 -0300, Clark Morris wrote:
greatest value of GOTO is the longjump; the ability to exit a
nest of not only compounds, but also blocks and function calls.
I pine for this facility in Rexx, POSIX shell,
Whitehead famously defined a Unitarian as someone who believes in, at
most, one God.
The analogous principle here is that a COBOL batch main program may
have at most one parameter, a PARM, a value of which may be omitted
from, for example, a JCL EXEC statement, in which case its value will
be a
On 10/2/2013 10:28 AM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Has anyone noticed lately that IBMLINK seems to be missing?
It's been up and down like a yo-yo.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
On 2 Oct 2013 16:08:12 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main Ed Jaffee
wrote:
On 10/2/2013 10:28 AM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Has anyone noticed lately that IBMLINK seems to be missing?
It's been up and down like a yo-yo.
Are there any SHARE requirements for IBMLINK availability? For those
of you who
On 3/10/2013 3:35 AM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
IBM has reportedly become more interested in LLVM for z:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTM1MTc
and has contributed some patches to the LLVM project (at least for C/C++
compilers):
Binyamin's advice to use a SLIP is on the mark.
Do you need help with the details?
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
I use FRRs a lot because just about every PC routine I write can be called from
an SRB. The PC routine defines a ESTAEX when called in task mode and examines
the FRR stack and adds or replaces an FRR when called in an SRB routine or when
a lock is set. I rarely use EUT=YES FRRS. Not a big fan
On 10/02/2013 01:06 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 11:47:44 -0500, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
Mark,
I'm curious - if the PDS is allocated with DISP=SHR, will IDCAMS use ISPF
compatible ENQs to serialize the member when deleting?
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
On Oct 2, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
There is delete pds(member), but that requires exclusive access.
That is an IDCAMS command, not TSO.
Way back when we ran into this issue with IDCAMS.
The way we got around it was to have a DD statement with the dsn and
a disp=shr
On 10/2/2013 5:48 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
Are there any SHARE requirements for IBMLINK availability?
Yes.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
87 matches
Mail list logo
