> Can you point me to the best place to see if Ziip is getting maxed out.
Look at the TYPE70 SMF records. They will show you if the ZIIP is 100% busy.
Regards, Barbara
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
> On May 17, 2018, at 3:05 PM, Brian France wrote:
>
> On 05/17/2018 01:25 PM, Edward Gould wrote:
__snip--
> excellent and no one ever questioned me, after it was Hmmm…
> And just how many stubbed toes
I'm sorry, but the following will not answer your immediate question about how
to determine if a zIIP is getting maxed out. I don't know the answer to your
specific question. These comments pertain more to a longer view of performance
monitoring.
In the interim though, you can always try to
Not trying to be a jerk, but you're playing with fire here. Call Cheryl
Watson and pay for some help. Take some classes. Go to SHARE and learn. If
management is too cheap to pay for the expertise, update your resume and go
find a real job.
I'd explain it to them this way: If the lead engineer at
Our senior performance person has retired. We have a ZIIP on a Z13s. One of
our customers is using Adabase and some
product to make maximum use of the Ziip. They feel that the Ziip has maxed
out from I think messages they are getting from their product and response is
slower. I am getting
It sounds as though you only have one CF? At least two is the recommended
config. In that case you move the structures from one CF to the other then
work on the “empty” one.
You can always revert to using SMF datasets while working on the CF.
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 4:40 PM Kenneth J. Kripke
It was implemented in z/OS 1.11, and disclosed it to the ISVs, but it
was
not documented at that time because it would not be useful to customers
until software vendors had time to get their products into compliance.
Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp.
Hello;
I wish to get some input on handling outages for the coupling
facilities when it comes to such activities as an IML to
Expand the Coupling facility sizes. We had an episode where the Partition
was reconfigured for more storage which disrupted recording of
The SMF data. The data
Hello Art,
I think $DSPOOL(vv),UNITDATA would show that information in ATTRIBUTE
parm.
---
*Lucas Rosalen*
rosalen.lu...@gmail.com / lucas.rosal...@ibm.com
I've been playing around with $MIGRATE SPOOL, and have had a few degrees of
success, however, on some of our rather archaic systems, I get:
$HASP003 RC=(136),M 775
$HASP003 RC=(136),M SPL(vv) - Command is not allowed on a
$HASP003target volume with this format.
This is a MERGE
On 05/17/2018 01:25 PM, Edward Gould wrote:
>> On May 17, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>>
in IBM sort you have to specify equals this seemed to be the hardest
>> Edward,
>>
>> You can set EQUALS as default at the installation level for DFSORT. There
>> is a
> On May 17, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>
>>> in IBM sort you have to specify equals this seemed to be the hardest
>
> Edward,
>
> You can set EQUALS as default at the installation level for DFSORT. There
> is a slight overhead with EQUALS option which increases
On Thu, 17 May 2018 09:44:18 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>
>I remember a few years ago, when I was going over this facility with some
>programmers, one of them said something along the lines of "I don't know
>how many records I need. I just know that I need 100 cylinders."
>
Likewise, many years
>>in IBM sort you have to specify equals this seemed to be the hardest
Edward,
You can set EQUALS as default at the installation level for DFSORT. There
is a slight overhead with EQUALS option which increases the time needed for
comparison of records and for data transfer. DFSORT team provides
On 5/17/2018 1:19 AM, zos reader wrote:
Hello All,
We are planning to migrate Syncsort to IBM DFSort, May you share your
thoughts on it, some might have done this on their shops, please share your
experience
Thanks, Samat
Samat,
Be sure to do your due diligence and run performance tests
> On May 17, 2018, at 12:20 AM, zos reader wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> We are planning to migrate Syncsort to IBM DFSort, May you share your
> thoughts on it, some might have done this on their shops, please share your
> experience
>
> Thanks, Samat
>
I have done this a
On 2018-05-14 17:51, Phil Smith III wrote:
Charles wrote, in part:
I wrote a large set of applications in Rexx once. I put all of my "intended
to be global" variable names into a single Rexx variable and exposed it
with
Procedure Expose (Rexx_Globals)
Yep. That's one of the approaches;
I am not sure why you want to capture this with Rexx, but I will second the
idea of using the SPIN= keyword to spin off log entries on a regular interval.
If you just want to capture to disk, you can use one of the products mentioned,
or if you don't have such a product, you can create an
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Tim Hare
wrote:
> This is, actually, a request for records - I was using the 1-byte average
> record size because I thought the original poster wanted to allocate in
> megabytes. If you want to request records and you know the
This is, actually, a request for records - I was using the 1-byte average
record size because I thought the original poster wanted to allocate in
megabytes. If you want to request records and you know the LRECL or the
average LRECL, use AVGREC=U/K/M, and SPACE=(avgLRECL,(pri,sec)) where
Ladies and Gentlemen,
A gentle reminder that the next meeting of the GSE UK Security Working Group,
will take place on Thursday 28th June 2018 at the offices of SAS UK in Marlow,
UK – the venue is approximately a 30 minute drive from London Heathrow Airport.
We now have a full agenda, which is
I am not going to be doing PUT after the dump. The PUT is just to manually
load some test data from a 3rd lpar.
I have to use GET on the unloaded dump receiving lpar because the lpar
creating the dump is prevented from doing a PUT to another lpar -
It was set up to be a one way street only.
Jim,
You said:
On any currently supported release of z/OS, in DIAGxx, you can specify
ALLOWUSERKEYCADS(NO)
I don't see that in Init & Tuning? Is this an undocumented option?
_
Dave Jousma
Manager Mainframe Engineering,
Jim-
Thanks for the clarification.
Robin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: 16 May 2018 22:41
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: UserKEY CSA/Dataspace scope=common Remdiation
Post z/OS 2.3, only
24 matches
Mail list logo