Followed the instructions in 5.7.
when I run make from the glib-build directory I get this:
fs@lfshost /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build $ make
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
What am I doing wrong?
Please help.
Bob S.
--
hello,
Wow lots to learn, I have little computer background and no formal
computer training I'm self taught.
I'm a bit stuck... menuconfig.. and the file .config coping over my distro's
config file to .config in the build directory then loading it to menuconfig
making additional
append the .config file or make a new one?
P.S. thanks for your generous effort in my behalf.
tw3ak
From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
To: Robert Cox
From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Sent: Sunday, September 9, 2012 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] prerequisites
Robert Cox wrote:
communication skills are a personal weakness, please allow me
I was and am only an average Linux user . You guys roughed me up a bit but you
got me through a build. Took me like 25 or more tries but I completed the
build. Tw3ak. Thanks--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
going thru the prerequisites again and decided to build a custom kernel for my
distro.
linux gets confusing because of the independent thinking both good and bad...
1. distro call for debian is export cpu flags and so on... and the straight
build is j4 or +1 or all the virtual cpu's depends
ok ,
there's a big red notice on the live cd page don't use on 7.0 I see
the script and my distro seems to need many changes... could someone be kinnd
enough to give me a hint as to what live cd might work? thanks in advance
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
thanks
From: Tiago Barros tiago.e...@gmail.com
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] live cd
I built LFS 7.0 using the Gentoo Live DVD (version 12, if I remember well). No
My thanks to Firerat and DJ Lucas. I am well on my way -- I have
successfully built gingerbread-release and run it in a target!
DJ IMO, the biggest pain of building android is learning to use the repo
DJ script instead of git by itself.
Yes, that is the thing I'm still a bit fuzzy on. How do
William Immendorf will.immendorf at gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Casey Daniels - lfs lfs at cd.kcfam.net
wrote:
/media/lfs/sources/file-5.04/src/.libs/lt-file: error while loading shared
libraries: libz.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
Bruce Dubbs bruce.dubbs at gmail.com writes:
File can use zlib, but what you should have from ./configure in Chapter
5 is:
checking zlib.h usability... no
checking zlib.h presence... no
checking for zlib.h... no
...
checking for gzopen in -lz... no
It looks like you didn't set up
In 2009 I customized the LFS Live CD to build a bootable demonstration
application. The Live CD includes makefiles that do the full build.
You do a single make and hours later an .iso file pops out.
The last release of the live CD corresponded to LFS 6.3. I updated
the particular components I
Any suggestions?
I'm working at 6.22. Coreutils-8.10
==
1 of 15 tests failed
(8 tests were not run)
See tests/test-suite.log
Please report to bug-coreut...@gnu.org
==
make[4]: *** [test-suite.log] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving
On 08/05/2011 05:30 PM, Andrew Elian wrote:
Hi Robert,
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 11:41:15AM -0500, robert wrote:
Any suggestions?
I'm working at 6.22. Coreutils-8.10
==
1 of 15 tests failed
snip
make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/coreutils-8.10/tests
device.map is empty!
Suggestions help chastisement appreciated.
Robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
vi. Prerequisites
link seems to be broken ...
#
The Linux Users' Guide http://www.linuxhq.com/guides/LUG/guide.html
This guide covers the usage of assorted Linux software. This reference is also
fairly old, but still valid.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
I've reposted this ... previous post possibly lost with earlier similarly
titled
thread.
Original Message
Subject: 6.16. GCC-4.5.2
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:36:04 -0500
From: robert mullinrob...@gmail.com
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
is set up properly. I would suggest that you
carry on.
Best of luck,
ae
Thanks. I'm going forward.
Robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
?
Thanks in advance for comments.
Robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 06/22/2011 04:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
robert wrote:
6.36. Bzip2-1.0.6 works fine until I reach instruction:
rm -v /usr/bin/{bunzip2,bzcat,bzip2}
re-ran the sequence and stopped just before this command; checked /usr/bin
for
bunzip2, bzcat, and bzip2; these do not exist
Serious errors? are these the errors noted
Note that 2 tests are known to fail as they rely on warnings output from
Groff,
which changed slightly in Groff-1.21.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/man-db-2.5.9/src/tests'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/man-db-2.5.9/src/tests'
make[2]:
... 217.196.43.134
Connecting to pkg-shadow.alioth.debian.org|217.196.43.134|:21... failed:
Connection refused.
further, a visit to http://pkg-shadow.alioth.debian.org/ reveals nothing of
note
for shadow-4.1.4.3.tar.bz2
suggestions? proceed with shadow-4.1.4.2.tar.bz2???
thanks.
robert
On 06/20/2011 09:14 AM, Eric Plummer wrote:
robert wrote:
as per instruction at 3.2 All packages ...
wget ftp://pkg-shadow.alioth.debian.org/pub/pkg-shadow/shadow-4.1.4.3.tar.bz2
--2011-06-20 08:45:32--
ftp://pkg-shadow.alioth.debian.org/pub/pkg-shadow/shadow-4.1.4.3.tar.bz2
On 06/16/2011 05:30 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
robert wrote:
cannot get beyond this:
make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.12.1'
make: *** [check] Error 2
make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
make[2
]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/rt/tst-cpuclock2.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [rt/tests] Error 2
make: *** [check] Error 2
any suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
Robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
On 06/16/2011 02:37 PM, Mike McCarty wrote:
robert wrote:
cannot get beyond this:
make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.12.1'
make: *** [check] Error 2
make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
make[2
perhaps go back and run version-check.sh?
Anand Arumugam wrote:
Hello all,
The machine in which I am trying to get LFS built was running the latest
version of debian. But I changed the distro to Xubuntu 10.10 while
retaining the /mnt/lfs partition. I was not able to login to /mnt/lfs
Direct cable from Westell DSL router to network connection on box.
boot up ...
Bringing up eth0 interface ...
... sky2 :03:00.0: eth0: enabling interface
ADDRCONF (NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
Adding IPv4 address 10.0.0.2 to the eth0 interface ... [ OK ]
setting up default gateway
/etc/sysconfig/network-devices/ifconfig.eth0/ipv4 NOW READS:
ONBOOT=yes
SERVICE=ipv4-static
IP=192.168.1.100
GATEWAY=192.168.1.254
PREFIX=24
BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
boot now yields:
Bringing up eth0 interface ...
... sky2 :03:00.0: eth0: enabling interface
ADDRCONF (NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is
Randy McMurchy wrote:
robert wrote these words on 01/20/11 15:32 CST:
/etc/sysconfig/network-devices/ifconfig.eth0/ipv4 NOW READS:
ONBOOT=yes
SERVICE=ipv4-static
IP=192.168.1.100
GATEWAY=192.168.1.254
PREFIX=24
BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
What are you using for your gateway hardware? I
Drew Ames wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/12/2010 08:28 PM, robert wrote:
Someday of course I'll be able to add only known quantities after the
fresh build and thereby keep the whole thing smartly clean
something like a system-wide RSA number.
Robert
root:/sources# tar xf bzip2-1.0.5.tar.gz
root:/sources# cd bzip2-1.0.5
root:/sources/bzip2-1.0.5# patch -np1 -i ../bzip2-1.0.5-install_docs-1.patch
patch: Only garbage was found in the patch input.
What's gone wrong? I've downloaded the patches anew twice ... no luck.
--
Mike Hollis wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:37:33AM -0600, Robert Mullin wrote:
root:/sources# tar xf bzip2-1.0.5.tar.gz
root:/sources# cd bzip2-1.0.5
root:/sources/bzip2-1.0.5# patch -np1 -i ../bzip2-1.0.5-install_docs-1.patch
patch: Only garbage was found in the patch input.
What's
Randy McMurchy wrote:
robert wrote these words on 12/12/10 12:43 CST:
Suddenly, I suspected that to be the problem ... maybe
not. In any case, I've one terminal and only one tab ... chroot.
Things seem to be going swimmingly ... until this -npl -Npl moment.
And just for completeness, you
No small sense of accomplishment attaches to having finished up this
project. Of course, this cannot be anywhere near as gratifying as
having actually put together this little project. Many people no doubt
involved. A warm gracias merci beaucoup danke to all of you.
As I believe I mentioned
Randy McMurchy wrote:
robert wrote these words on 12/12/10 16:22 CST:
Any precautionary notes before I light out for the wilderness?
Why reinvent the wheel? An automated system to build LFS already exists!
Instead of simply doing boring work adding together the commands, why
not use your
Ken Moffat wrote:
Two thoughts (as someone who creates his own scripts to do this).
First, give some thought to catching error messages (e.g. by logging
stderr), whilst remembering that every script you create will bring
its own new bugs.
Second, and more importantly, the perfect is the
Plodding back through my build once again, altogether pleased with
revisiting my old friends, binutils and gcc and linux, I wonder, is
there a way to run a very simple test on these installs.
I know of course that we have the elaborate screens full of testing as
we move along, but is there not
Stuart Stegall wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 06:31:31PM -0600, robert wrote:
No, I got the me hopes part ... quite Shakespearean, in fact ... as in
methinks ...
It's the build itself part ... still don't understand
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:12:52AM -0600, robert wrote:
Partial output of make check:
make --no-print-directory check-recursive
Making check in .
make --no-print-directory libudev/test-libudev udev/test-udev
make[3]: `libudev/test-libudev' is up to date.
make[3]: `udev
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 04:48:22PM -0600, robert wrote:
Thanks everyone for the help. I do have /dev/sda5:
/dev/sda5: UUID=a6ce6f3f-7bb5-4069-a32c-a8388472f15d TYPE=ext3
You write English well, but I wonder if you have misunderstood ?
The question can be reworded
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 04:46:00PM -0600, robert wrote:
.config of host reveals: # CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2 is not set
gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3
glibc: libc-2.11.1.so
kernel: vmlinuz-2.6.32-26-generic
Those seem adequate
what does this mean?
me hopes this isn't
just did the build at host level:
works fine.
any suggestions?
[X] make check
make --no-print-directory check-recursive
Making check in .
make --no-print-directory libudev/test-libudev udev/test-udev
CC libudev/test-libudev.o
CCLD libudev/test-libudev
CC udev/test-udev.o
Neal Murphy wrote:
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 04:55:43 robert wrote:
unpacked udev-161.tar.bz2
cd udev-161
then copy and paste ... (the two dearchive operations are xvf??? and
not jxvf???
'tar xvf' unpacks a noncompressed tar archvie (.tar).
'tar xvfj' unpacks a bz2-compressed archive
Mike Hollis wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 03:55:43AM -0600, robert wrote:
Mike H.-
jumped back out to root user
asserted root:root for /tools (verified)
still at root:
copy and paste everything from 6.2 thru 6.6
now in chroot ...
move over to 6.59 and ...
unpacked udev-161
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
robert wrote:
Neal Murphy wrote:
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 04:55:43 robert wrote:
unpacked udev-161.tar.bz2
cd udev-161
then copy and paste ... (the two dearchive operations are xvf??? and
not jxvf???
'tar xvf' unpacks a noncompressed tar archvie (.tar).
'tar xvfj
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:36:31PM -0600, robert wrote:
So, I don't follow then. Instructions at 6.59. Udev-161
say: tar -xvf ../udev-config-20100128.tar.bz2 ...
why not *J*xvf?
Apart from the other responses, I can't help commenting that 'J' is
not 'j'. I assume you
Daryl Lee wrote:
On 12/06/2010 11:34 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Daryl Lee wrote:
I am off and running with my newly repartitioned drive and have
something to report, but not sure where to send it, so here goes.
I'm using version 6.7 of the LFS book, and one of the files in wget-list
( has a
]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [check] Error 2
I've stepped back through it numerous times to catch an operator error.
No luck. Any suggestions? Driving me batty.
Any suggestions?
robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
6.59.1 says, in part:
Create some devices and directories that Udev cannot handle due to them
being required very early in the boot process, or by Udev itself:
$install -dv /lib/{firmware,udev/devices/{pts,shm}}
$mknod -m0666 /lib/udev/devices/null c 1 3
Does this mean, then, that I am
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
robert wrote:
Does this mean, then, that I am supposed to receive the message:
FAIL: test/udev-test.pl
Do you have the filesystems mounted in the chroot environment? (Section
6.2.3)
-- Bruce
yes, in chroot environment.
when I de-archive the bz2 files
Near the finish line.
I've added a 41_lfs file to /etc/grub.d on my host system
41_lfs contains:
#!/bin/sh
exec tail -n +3 $0
menuentry lfs {
set root=(hd1,4)
linux /boot/vmlinux-2.6.35.4-lfs-6.7
}
$update-grub
returns:
Generating grub.cfg ...
Found linux image:
follow-up on previous post ...
booted to grub prompt
grubls ... revealed that hd2,4 is the proper partition
grubset root=(hd2,4)
grublinux /boot/vmlinux-2.6.35.4-lfs-6.7 ... tab-completion provided
this, so I'm certainly using the correct partition
grub boot ... produces some sweet whirring
tar zxf pkg-config-0.25.tar.gz
cd pkg-config-0.25
sed -i -e 's/XT])dnl/XT])[]dnl/' -e 's/\.])dnl/\.])[]dnl/' pkg.m4
./configure --prefix=/usr
make
make check ... yields:
FAIL: check-conflicts
./common: line 25: sed: command not found
./common: line 25: sed: command not found
./common: line 25:
follow up:
building outside of chroot works fine ...???
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Andre Keller wrote:
Am 03.12.2010 13:26, schrieb robert:
./common: line 25: sed: command not found
Thats your problem again: Check your sed installation.
Regards Andr�
yep! thanks.
robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
Simon Geard wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 13:11 -0600, robert wrote:
What has gone wrong? Am I supposed to cd /sources/linux-2.6.36.1 and
then $make mrproper?
Yes - remember the General Compilation Instructions:
3. For each package:
a. Using the tar program, extract
2
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [check] Error 2
I've stepped back through it four times to catch an operator error.
Any suggestions?
robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
Now then, at 7.8. The Bash Shell Startup Files
root:/# LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 locale language
English
root:/# LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 locale charmap
UTF-8
root:/# LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 locale int_curr_symbol
USD
root:/# LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 locale int_prefix
1
so now, do I modify /etc/profile to match these
, for, after having done so, the
little box whirred prettily and produced the following messages:
CLEAN scripts/basic
CLEAN scripts
CLEAN usr/include
CLEAN include/linux/version.h
How 'bout it. Is that correct?
Thanks in advance.
robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:48:15 -0600
robert mullinrob...@gmail.com wrote:
Events moving along swimmingly until this point:
6.7.1. Installation of Linux API Headers
The Linux kernel needs to expose an Application Programming Interface
(API) for the system's C library
Events moving along swimmingly until this point:
6.7.1. Installation of Linux API Headers
The Linux kernel needs to expose an Application Programming Interface
(API) for the system's C library (Glibc in LFS) to use. This is done by
way of sanitizing various C header files that are shipped in
at /usr/src I find linux-headers ... directories
issuing make mrproper elicits some response ...
is that what I should be doing? entering each directory and
$make mrproper
e.g.
r...@acer1:/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-24-generic# make mrproper
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 02:11:22PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
robert wrote:
working on the Expect build at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/expect.html
instructions say:
running the test suite is not mandatory ...
I do so anyway.
[...]
Should I
'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/mpc'
make[1]: *** [all-mpc] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build'
make: *** [all] Error 2
any suggestions?
I'll run it out again while awaiting counsel.
robert
--
http
Simon Geard wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 20:40 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Your host is missing required packages. Run the script in section vii.
Just a reminder, Bruce - pages are only numbered on the page itself, not
in the table of contents. Referring to the Host System Requirements
page
moving on to 5.6. Linux-2.6.35.4 API Headers
in gcc-build directory ...
$make mrproper
make: *** No rule to make target `mrproper'. Stop.
tried same command in gcc-4.5.1 sources tools /mnt/lfs directories
... same error
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
search-engining about a bit ... seems I need to tar the linux source ...
which did
moved into the resulting /mnt/lfs/source/linux-2.6.36.1 directory
$make mrproper
ran without error
is that the correct procedure?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
from within linux-2.6.36.1 directory
$patch -Np1 -i ../glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch
yields:
patching file nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pt-initfini.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 45.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pt-initfini.c.rej
patching file
fastidiously accurate notes as I move through the
build process and will share those areas of vagueness in the future.
Thanks for your attention.
robert
William Immendorf wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:11 AM, robert mullinrob...@gmail.com wrote:
from within linux-2.6.36.1 directory
$patch -Np1
Mike Hollis wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:11:57AM -0600, robert wrote:
from within linux-2.6.36.1 directory
$patch -Np1 -i ../glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch
yields:
patching file nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pt-initfini.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 45.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
robert wrote:
I have a fairly good beginner's grasp of the compile/build procedure.
And yes, I refer often to 5.3.
Until you get the hang of things, I suggest having three windows open.
1. Browser at the bottom of Section 5.3.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs
Arrived at step 5.5.1, Installation of Cross GCC.
I am using LFS-BOOK-6.7-HTML/chapter05/gcc-pass1.html
I have unpacked the mpfr, gmp, and mpc tarballs and renamed the
resulting directories as instructed
I created /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build directory
then, cd /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build
I
What, in general, should I expect from make command? A success
notification? Exit code 0? How about this ... fatal?
make[3]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/bfd/po'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `info'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/bfd/po'
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 06:21:14PM -0600, amalafrida wrote:
make yields the following message ... should I be concerned?
../../gcc-4.5.1/gcc/tree.h:5459: error: 'LANG_TYPE' undeclared (first
use in this function)
../../gcc-4.5.1/gcc/tree.h:5459: warning: comparison is
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
- wiped all the directories clean ... tools/ sources/
- fresh extract of binutils from within /mnt/lfs/sources/
- moved into newly-created binutils-2.20.1 directory
- $mkdir ../binutils-build
- $cd ../binutils-build
prepared for compilation
-
Andre Keller wrote:
Am 25.11.2010 03:48, schrieb robert:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Your host is missing required packages. Run the script in section vii.
-- Bruce
section vii. chapter vii.??
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/prologue/hostreqs.html
Yes, ran
21:58:16 -0400
Neal Murphy neal.p.mur...@alum.wpi.edu wrote:
On Sunday 11 July 2010 21:33:23 Robert Whitcomb wrote:
Thanks very much for your help, the CC value was set wrong. But now
I am running into another issue:
/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: crti.o: No such file
Greetings all,
I am running into some issues regarding section 5.10.1 of the current stable
version of the book. When attempting to build gcc, I receive the following
error:
Checking multilib configuration for libgomp...
Configuring in i686-pc-linux-gnu/libgomp
configure: loading cache
Murphy neal.p.mur...@alum.wpi.eduwrote:
On Sunday 11 July 2010 10:21:53 littlebat wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 08:48:28 -0400
Robert Whitcomb rwhitc...@acm.org wrote:
checking for
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc
in Section 5.10. GCC-4.4.3 - Pass 2
Running env | grep LFS_TGT while logged on as the lfs user gives me
i686-lfs-linux-gnu.
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Neal Murphy neal.p.mur...@alum.wpi.eduwrote:
On Sunday 11 July 2010 21:33:23 Robert Whitcomb wrote:
Thanks very much for your help, the CC value was set wrong. But now I am
What I have done is to build a grub CD that also includes copies of
the kernel and initrd from the desired root device. Grub can then use
the same BIOS I/O to start the kernel and the kernel will have the
device support for the BIOS-inaccessible root device.
--
whoa...THAT's what I need I think.
can you post an iso of that cd so I can use it as a reference?
OK, you can fetch:
http://msbit.com/osdv/sample-grub.iso
It is grub plus the Ubuntu 9.04 kernel. You can interrupt the boot
sequence and edit the kernel line to specify the desired root
I built a customized (somewhat stripped, then other things added) LFS
back in April, 2009. It's based on the 6.3 LFS live CD with packages
updated to the 6.4 book (current at the time).
The LFS live CD is a very good starting point. I haven't explored
other (even more stripped) alternatives
in /usr/bin but you could put them in / directory
and invoke /logir /rch
.
Enjoy(?) and regards Robert C. Hansen
Bob
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
r-v-r Now I would like to create my own bootable lfs-cd. My question
r-v-r is: How to do it.
I recently built a custom LFS live CD for the Open Source Digital
Voting Foundation. I updated the live CD makefiles to reflect LFS 6.4
(plus a few other changes) and added an application program (Pvote)
you are in the wrong location of the file tree probably maybe only one . not
two..?
--- On Fri, 9/25/09, aztec...@comcast.net aztec...@comcast.net wrote:
From: aztec...@comcast.net aztec...@comcast.net
Subject: stuck at part 5.4 in the manual
To: Linux From Scratch
There's an LFS hint describing how to boot LFS without requiring a
separate partition (i.e., in the same file system as another operating
system).
The trick is a special pre-init program that does a chroot early in
the boot process (automatically, rather than manually as Russell
Stockhammer
I like the idea behind LFS and would like to explore all of the
options. LFS offers better control over the process.
LFS is an excellent project and I think it will suit your needs as a
starting point; as Ken Moffat points out, you will have some further
work to do on cross-platform
I ran my build and found one minor glitch: links to fetch tcl and
e2fsprogs from sourceforge have changed.
(If someone knows the right way to make a permanent sourceforge link,
please tell me. :-)
Here is a patch to fix it. cd /mnt/newlfs/newlfs-livecd; patch -p0
lfs-sourceforge-patch
I need help for making LFS bootable iso.
I have already googled about how making an bootable iso but i have no
idea how should i process -_-
If some one did it yet, please i need to know all the steps.
Thanks.
I recently built a custom LFS live CD for the Open Source Digital
Voting
A warning about my OSDV LFS Live CD:
My build structure is a little fragile due to my adding the Pvote
application and making the live CD automatically run the demo (that
was the purpose of my exercise).
The default target in my master Makefile is osdv-iso, the live Pvote
demo CD. The iso
that is wrong you have not setup your environmental variable right.
LFS=/mnt/lfs export LFS
--- On Wed, 6/17/09, khaled gouaich gouaichkha...@gmail.com wrote:
From: khaled gouaich gouaichkha...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Help: ownership problem of $LFS/tools
To: LFS Support List
I recently built a custom LFS live CD for the Open Source Digital
Voting Foundation. I updated the live CD makefiles to reflect LFS 6.4
(plus a few other changes) and added an application program (Pvote)
and its dependencies (Python, SDL, pygame). I made it boot to the
root prompt, or just run
I get an error installing e2fsprogs:
LFS version: 6.4
Host distrib: CentOS 5.3
Package: e2fsprogs1.41.3
Error (see below): touch: setting times of `subdirs': Function not
implemented
lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/e2fsprogs-1.41.3/build$ make
cd ./util ; make subst
make[1]: Entering directory
On a whim, I renamed the executable /tools/bin/touch and created a
symlink from /bin/touch (the app from the host system) and the make
completed and the app install without errors.
Could this be a mis-step when I installed the coreutils?
-Original Message-
From: Dewees, Robert L
Sent
On a whim, I renamed the executable /tools/bin/touch and created a
symlink from /bin/touch (the app from the host system) and the make
completed and the app install without errors.
Could this be a mis-step when I installed the coreutils?
I hit this too. It's due to building on an old
You write that the kernel has successfully mounted the root file
system. Are you sure? This kind of crash is often due to a failure
to mount /. How is the CF card connected physically?
You also write you have no initramfs. I suggest you create one --
then if initialization cannot mount root
First, I want to thank everyone involved in creating the LFS project.
It is a beautiful piece of software craftsmanship -- useful, elegant
and well documented.
I'm writing this post because I have a suggestion for the Live CD part
of the LFS project. I went back and read the Live CD mailing list
I have been checking the md5sums as I build LFS following the
instructions in the 6.4 book. All have matched except for
udev-config.
On p. 27 the LFS 6.4 book indicates the md5sum for
udev-config-20081015.tar.bz2 is ac53f85ee6d3f31964a591f4b86e7707.
Files fetched from www.linuxfromscratch.org,
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
