Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Marcel Grunauer
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:56:28PM +0100, Struan Donald wrote: > > nowhere we might be tempted to sit by the thames till the wee small > hours generating tremendous hangovers :) "sit"? IIRC, you tried to lean against a bench but unfortunately were standing between two benches, landing on the gro

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Simon Wistow
Dave Cross wrote: > I understood that you had delegated the actual work to someone else. > > Can you ensure that your vice-chair is able to speak in your place. Umm. Ok. Somebody give me the designs and I'll get them printed. Talk over. Or am I missing something?

RE: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread dcross - David Cross
From: Simon Wistow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 9:17 AM > Dave Cross wrote: > > > I understood that you had delegated the actual work to someone else. > > > > Can you ensure that your vice-chair is able to speak in your place. > > Umm. Ok. > > Somebody give me the design

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Struan Donald
* at 10/04 09:15 +0100 Greg McCarroll said: > * Marcel Grunauer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:56:28PM +0100, Struan Donald wrote: > > > > > > nowhere we might be tempted to sit by the thames till the wee small > > > hours generating tremendous hangovers :) > > > > "si

Re: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread Aaron Trevena
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Robert Shiels wrote: > A lot of you write and distribute free perl code. What do you do about > copyright and disclaimers in the code itself. I've had a look at a few > examples and it seems you don't really bother. > > I think it is probably worth doing, and we will need one

RE: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread dcross - David Cross
From: Robert Shiels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 1:10 PM > A lot of you write and distribute free perl code. What do you do about > copyright and disclaimers in the code itself. I've had a look at a few > examples and it seems you don't really bother. > > I think it is probab

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Simon Wistow
dcross - David Cross wrote: > Mr Cantrell has them I believe. I shall proceed from here whence forth unto smack Mr Cantrell until he doth giveth over the designs. Hither-unto. And heretowards. And yea it shall be so. Or something. > You're missing the fact that by the meeting you'll have 9

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Redvers Davies
> Does anyone want to take on the task of being projector monitor and picking > it up from Sussex? Normally I would but i'm buried under the New York contingent for the next few weeks so can't really go anywhere. Red

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Robert Shiels
> > > > > might be nice to have status reports from: > > > > > > * The t-shirt committee > > What is the design that you have agreed on? I will probably want one. http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/things/321a.html is a fairly new addition I think. /Robert

Re: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 09:59:20AM +0100, Aaron Trevena wrote: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Robert Shiels wrote: > > A lot of you write and distribute free perl code. What do you do about > > copyright and disclaimers in the code itself. I've had a look at a few > > examples and it seems you don't really

Re: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread David Cantrell
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 09:58:41AM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: > Anything I release always has the following copyright and I think that a > number of module and script authors use a very similar form of words out of > respect for Larry. > > Dave... > > Copyright (C) 2000, Magnum Solution

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Simon Wistow wrote: > dcross - David Cross wrote: > > Mr Cantrell has them I believe. > I shall proceed from here whence forth unto smack Mr Cantrell until he > doth giveth over the designs. Hither-unto. And heretowards. Can we all join in? :) MBM -- Matthew Byng-Maddick

Re: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread Leon Brocard
Aaron Trevena sent the following bits through the ether: > I habitually use the GPL, I have only recently realised how much of a pig > it can be to keep a derived work compliant. Yup, that's why I like it so much. *This week* I'm a fan of the GPL, and how it keeps the community going. [insert ra

Re: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread David Cantrell
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 09:59:20AM +0100, Aaron Trevena wrote: > I habitually use the GPL, I have only recently realised how much of a pig > it can be to keep a derived work compliant. It will now take as long to > audit the changes made to mny derived work of mwforum as it did to do some > of th

RE: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread dcross - David Cross
From: Robert Shiels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 10:19 AM > > > might be nice to have status reports from: > > > > > * The t-shirt committee > > What is the design that you have agreed on? I will probably want one. There are five. So you'll probably want somewhere between on

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Greg McCarroll
* Matthew Byng-Maddick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Simon Wistow wrote: > > dcross - David Cross wrote: > > > Mr Cantrell has them I believe. > > I shall proceed from here whence forth unto smack Mr Cantrell until he > > doth giveth over the designs. Hither-unto. And heretowar

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Neil Ford
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 10:05:51AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: > dcross - David Cross wrote: > > > Mr Cantrell has them I believe. > > I shall proceed from here whence forth unto smack Mr Cantrell until he > doth giveth over the designs. Hither-unto. And heretowards. > > And yea it shall be so.

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Piers Cawley
jo walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Last Thursday I bullied^Wasked some people to consider doing talks for us, > > but I can't remember who they were. This is your opportunity to step > > forward. > > i recall promising to do 20 minutes on '101 fun things to do with > Tangram', or something

Re: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread Robert Shiels
From: "David Cantrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 10 April 2001 10:40 Subject: Re: Disclaimer > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 09:58:41AM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: > > > Anything I release always has the following copyright and I think that a > > number of module and scr

Re: Torvalds not impressed with OS X

2001-04-10 Thread Piers Cawley
Jonathan Stowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Chris Devers wrote: > > > At 08:22 AM 9.4.2001 +, Robin Szemeti wrote: > > >personally the ultimate task of any minimise/restore function should be > > >to get a window on or off the dispaly as fast as possible ... slowly > >

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Simon Wistow
Neil Ford wrote: > Do we need to dig up the original meeting notes regarding .pm/colour > combinations or is Simon to 'wing it'? Got em, cheers.

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Leon Brocard
dcross - David Cross sent the following bits through the ether: > Last Thursday I bullied^Wasked some people to consider doing talks for us, Righto, I'd like to do talks on the following subjects: o Creating an optimising compiler and interpreter for a toy language o More Graphing Perl (cra

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread David Cantrell
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 11:04:07AM +0100, Neil Ford wrote: > Do we need to dig up the original meeting notes regarding .pm/colour > combinations or is Simon to 'wing it'? I forwarded it to him, along with the designs that Paul did. -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.or

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote: > * Matthew Byng-Maddick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Simon Wistow wrote: > > > I shall proceed from here whence forth unto smack Mr Cantrell until he > > > doth giveth over the designs. Hither-unto. And heretowards. > > Can we all

RE: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Paul Mison
On 10/04/2001 at 10:55 +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: >From: Robert Shiels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> What is the design that you have agreed on? I will probably want one. > >There are five. So you'll probably want somewhere between one and five of >them :) > >Are the designs on the web anywhere?

Re: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 11:27:48AM +0100, Robert Shiels wrote: > 1. I want anything I write to be free for others to use and generally bugger > about with. > 2. I don't want anyone to be allowed to sell my code, or to sell anything > closely derived from it. In that case, don't go for a BSD-style

Dia diagrams from your perl!

2001-04-10 Thread Aaron Trevena
I have uploaded AutoDIAL to my site where it can now be downloaed. It creates UML class diagrams showing relationshiops, methods, attributes, etc for a bunch of scripts/modules and lays them out ready for autodial to use, although I think the relationship line plotting is a little broken. It r

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Robin Houston
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:09:14PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: > As usual I'll aim at having four or five lightning talks and two or three > longer talks. I'd like to give a (preferably "longer") talk about parsing and semantic transformation of Perl code. I promise to think of a less scar

Re: Dia diagrams from your perl!

2001-04-10 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Aaron Trevena wrote: > and it can be found at http://droogs.org/autodial/ The download link is b0rked though /J\

Re: Dia diagrams from your perl!

2001-04-10 Thread Aaron Trevena
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Jonathan Stowe wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Aaron Trevena wrote: > > > and it can be found at http://droogs.org/autodial/ > > The download link is b0rked though > fixed A. -- http://termisoc.org/~betty"> Betty @ termisoc.org "As a youngster Fred fought sea battl

Perl on HPUX

2001-04-10 Thread Dean
Hi All Question for the list, i'm currently writing some scripts for a HP box running HPUX 11 and i keep hitting the same error when ever i try and use something (even 'use strict;'.) The error is "syntax error in file p2.pl at line 2, next 2 tokens "use strict" ". The file is a noddy scri

Re: Perl on HPUX

2001-04-10 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 01:11:07PM +0100, Dean wrote: > Hi All > Question for the list, i'm currently writing some scripts for a HP box > running HPUX 11 and i keep hitting the same error when ever i try and use > something (even 'use strict;'.) The error is "syntax error in file p2.pl > at

Re: Perl on HPUX

2001-04-10 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Dean wrote: > Question for the list, i'm currently writing some scripts for a HP box > running HPUX 11 and i keep hitting the same error when ever i try and use > something (even 'use strict;'.) The error is "syntax error in file p2.pl > at line 2, next 2 tokens "use str

Re: Perl on HPUX

2001-04-10 Thread Dean
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 01:13:59PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > /usr/contrib/bin/perl -V > To find out what version it is and post back. DOH! Its running 4.0.1.8 Should have spotted that... Next time you get told the dev box is a copy of the producing box don't believe them :) Thanks

Re: Perl on HPUX

2001-04-10 Thread Robert Shiels
From: "Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi All > Question for the list, i'm currently writing some scripts for a HP box > running HPUX 11 and i keep hitting the same error when ever i try and use Last time I used the default perl on HP-UX, it turned out to be perl 4. You may need a more recent distrib

Re: Perl on HPUX

2001-04-10 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 01:17:55PM +0100, Dean wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 01:13:59PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > /usr/contrib/bin/perl -V > > > To find out what version it is and post back. > > DOH! Its running 4.0.1.8 > > Should have spotted that... Next time you get told the

RE: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread dcross - David Cross
From: Robert Shiels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 11:28 AM > From: "David Cantrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 09:58:41AM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: > > > > > Anything I release always has the following copyright and I

RE: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, dcross - David Cross wrote: [broken quoting snipped] > You want the GPL for that. Which means that you can't use my copyright > message as it includes the Artisitc License - which doesn't disallow your > point 2. The GPL doesn't stop you selling the derived work. What it *doe

RE: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread Aaron Trevena
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, dcross - David Cross wrote: > [broken quoting snipped] > > You want the GPL for that. Which means that you can't use my copyright > > message as it includes the Artisitc License - which doesn't disallow your > > point 2. > >

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Richard Clamp
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 10:31:11PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > At 22:10 09/04/2001, Neil Ford wrote: > >On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:09:14PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: > > > > > > If anyone doesn't know (or has forgotten), there will be a technical > > meeting > > > on Thursday 19th April. I

RE: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Aaron Trevena wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, dcross - David Cross wrote: > > [broken quoting snipped] > > > You want the GPL for that. Which means that you can't use my copyright > > > message as it includes the Artisitc Lice

Re: Wavelan

2001-04-10 Thread Neil Ford
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 07:29:56PM +, Robin Szemeti wrote: > > my current plan of attack is probably 2 lucent/orinoco wavelan 128/RC4 > cards .. one in the laptop .. one in the border router machine on an ISA > adaptor .. one guy I spoke to reckoned it would work .. another reckoned > I was a

Re: Perl on HPUX

2001-04-10 Thread David Cantrell
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 01:11:07PM +0100, Dean wrote: > Question for the list, i'm currently writing some scripts for a HP box > running HPUX 11 and i keep hitting the same error when ever i try and use > something (even 'use strict;'.) The error is "syntax error in file p2.pl > at line 2, next 2

Re: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread Robert Shiels
From: "dcross - David Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > You want the GPL for that. Which means that you can't use my copyright > message as it includes the Artisitc License - which doesn't disallow your > point 2. I think therefore GPL will be good. People can sell my code, but as I will be giving

RE: Wavelan

2001-04-10 Thread Andrew Bowman
> From: Neil Ford [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > The perl script to do stuff with wireless scanning and GPS > had me salivating :-) Time to buy an eTrek I think. Where was GPS mentioned? I had a good hunt round (by myself and with the assistance of the Altavista host: search parameter) but couldn't f

Re: Wavelan

2001-04-10 Thread Neil Ford
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 02:36:31PM +0100, Andrew Bowman wrote: > > From: Neil Ford [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > The perl script to do stuff with wireless scanning and GPS > > had me salivating :-) Time to buy an eTrek I think. > > Where was GPS mentioned? I had a good hunt round (by myself

Tie::Scalar::Decay ...

2001-04-10 Thread David Cantrell
... is on its way to CPAN. If you're desperate for it, you can also snarf it from http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/tech/Tie-Scalar-Decay-1.0.tar.gz. It was inspired by Marcel's Tie::Scalar::Timeout. By default, it simulates radioactive decay with a fairly arbitrary half-life of five seconds. Y

Re: Tie::Scalar::Decay ...

2001-04-10 Thread Greg McCarroll
* David Cantrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > ... is on its way to CPAN. If you're desperate for it, you can also snarf > it from http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/tech/Tie-Scalar-Decay-1.0.tar.gz. > > It was inspired by Marcel's Tie::Scalar::Timeout. By default, it simulates > radioactive decay

Re: Tie::Scalar::Decay ...

2001-04-10 Thread Rob Partington
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * David Cantrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > ... is on its way to CPAN. If you're desperate for it, you can also snarf > > it from http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/tech/Tie-Scalar-Decay-1.0.tar.gz. > shurely Tie::Arra

Fw: Free PDP-11 equipment

2001-04-10 Thread David Cantrell
Forwarded, in case anyone here is interested. I'd love to have 'em myself, but don't have room. -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/ This is a signature. There are many like it but this one is mine. ** I read encrypted mail first, so encrypt if your m

Installing Perl/Tk on Win32

2001-04-10 Thread Andrew Bowman
I'm trying to install the Tk module on a Win32 system (I realise this is where my mistake lies, however, leaving that aside...). The docs say to: perl Makefile.PL nmake nmake test nmake install_perl Which seems to presume the presence of nmake as part of either an MS C or Borland C compiler set

Re: Installing Perl/Tk on Win32

2001-04-10 Thread jduncan
The activestate ppm files are best for this sort of thing. On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 04:45:40PM +0100, Andrew Bowman wrote: > I'm trying to install the Tk module on a Win32 system (I realise this is > where my mistake lies, however, leaving that aside...). The docs say to: > > perl Makefile.PL >

Re: Installing Perl/Tk on Win32

2001-04-10 Thread Dean
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 04:45:40PM +0100, Andrew Bowman wrote: > I'm trying to install the Tk module on a Win32 system (I realise this is > where my mistake lies, however, leaving that aside...). The docs say to: If you don't really need to compile it yourself how's about: ppm install Tk?

RE: Installing Perl/Tk on Win32

2001-04-10 Thread Andrew Bowman
> From: Dean [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > If you don't really need to compile it yourself how's about: > ppm install Tk? Good idea - I can see PPM being useful if I have to persist with Win32 stuff! Thanks for the pointer James & Dean. Andrew.

Re: Wavelan

2001-04-10 Thread Robin Szemeti
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, you wrote: > Better late than never, check out > http://www.live.com/wireless/unix-base-station.html > which looks like exactly what you want to achieve. > > Got this link from the Bay Area Wireless User Group pages > (http://www.bawug.org) which also look like quite a coo

Re: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread Marty Pauley
On Mon Apr 9 13:09:31 2001, Robert Shiels wrote: > A lot of you write and distribute free perl code. What do you do about > copyright and disclaimers in the code itself. I've had a look at a few > examples and it seems you don't really bother. > > I think it is probably worth doing, and we will

Re: Installing Perl/Tk on Win32

2001-04-10 Thread Robert Shiels
From: "Andrew Bowman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: Dean [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > If you don't really need to compile it yourself how's about: > > ppm install Tk? > > Good idea - I can see PPM being useful if I have to persist with Win32 > stuff! > Also, if you have any firewall problems, or

Re: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread Marty Pauley
On Tue Apr 10 11:27:48 2001, Robert Shiels wrote: > 1. I want anything I write to be free for others to use and generally bugger > about with. > 2. I don't want anyone to be allowed to sell my code, or to sell anything > closely derived from it. Then you cannot use GPL, Artistic, BSD, or any free

RE: Installing Perl/Tk on Win32

2001-04-10 Thread Andrew Bowman
> From: Robert Shiels [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Also, if you have any firewall problems, or a fast link at work and a > slow dialup at home Thanks again - I got it installed okay (no firewall probs). The laughable thing is that I have a fast link at home[1] and a slow ISDN at work (soon to be up

Re: Wavelan

2001-04-10 Thread Roger Horne
On Tue 10 Apr, Robin Szemeti wrote: > and .. should I ever find any of the Lucent/Orinoco/Agere Wavelan cards > I'll buy them in a Flash(tm) .. neither freebsd services or your mates in > Norwich have any .. infact no one does :( ... http://www.expansys.com/category.asp?cat=WIREL claim delivery

Re: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread Marty Pauley
On Tue Apr 10 13:59:15 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > No. You cannot sell the source and binaries seperately. Yes you can. If you do, you must sell the source at cost price. -- Marty PGP signature

Re: Tie::Scalar::Decay ...

2001-04-10 Thread Marty Pauley
On Tue Apr 10 15:51:21 2001, Rob Partington wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > * David Cantrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > ... is on its way to CPAN. If you're desperate for it, you can also snarf > > > it from http://www.cantrell.org.u

Re: Perl on HPUX

2001-04-10 Thread Elaine -HFB- Ashton
David Cantrell [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth: *> *>do perl -v to find out what version you have. If use of use is causing *>problems then you may have a (fear) perl4 there. If that's the case, *>kill someone slowly and painfully. http://cpan.valueclick.com/ports/#hpux There is also a 5.something v

RE: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Paul Mison
On 10/04/2001 at 10:55 +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: >From: Robert Shiels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> What is the design that you have agreed on? I will probably want one. > >There are five. So you'll probably want somewhere between one and five of >them :) > >Are the designs on the web anywhere?

Re: Installing Perl/Tk on Win32

2001-04-10 Thread Barbie
From: "Andrew Bowman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm trying to install the Tk module on a Win32 system (I realise this is > where my mistake lies, however, leaving that aside...). The docs say to: > > perl Makefile.PL > nmake > nmake test > nmake install_perl here's one I tried earlier :) Installin

Re: Wavelan

2001-04-10 Thread Robin Szemeti
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, you wrote: > On Tue 10 Apr, Robin Szemeti wrote: > > > and .. should I ever find any of the Lucent/Orinoco/Agere Wavelan cards > > I'll buy them in a Flash(tm) .. neither freebsd services or your mates in > > Norwich have any .. infact no one does :( ... > > http://www.expa

Re: Tie::Scalar::Decay ...

2001-04-10 Thread David Cantrell
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 03:51:21PM +0100, Rob Partington wrote: > Didn't Tony from Blackstar do this already? > > Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 14:33:40 + > From: Tony Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Tie::Scalar::Decay ...

2001-04-10 Thread Paul Makepeace
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 10:41:51PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > Whilst I thought that a radioactive-style decay was a suitable default, > for the app I wrote it for, a simple decrement every time period was > more appropriate. Cool Uses For Technology #497: Hmm, triggered on first access would

Re: Disclaimer

2001-04-10 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Aaron Trevena wrote: > The simplist would be > # Name - brief description. (c) Copyright 2001 A Nother # > # This is free software available under the same license as perl itself > # This sofwate comes with NO WARRANTY. For more information see URL or > FILE. > The NO WARRAN