Am Donnerstag 04 September 2014, 18:07:03 schrieb David L. Johnson:
> On 09/04/2014 03:34 PM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> > I'm facing the same problem with a beamer presentation created with LyX
> > 2.0 (\lyxformat 413). Now, I have version 2.1.1 but I get the same crash
> > mes
===
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 at 12:54 AM
From: Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org
To: Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com
Cc: lyx lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Beamer
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com
-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Beamer
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:
Hello,
I generate a presentation with beamer and I use the overlays option.
Thus I got 117 slides but only 47 pages.
I would like to print the complete 47 pages
Patrick Dupre pdupre at gmx.com writes:
I can have: \column{.49\texwidth}
But then, what I type goes into \column{}
If I make a return then I leave the column and go back to depth 1
How can I stay in the column (standard in depth 2?
Use increase depth after hitting Enter. The tool bar button
===
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 at 12:54 AM
From: Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org
To: Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com
Cc: lyx lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Beamer
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com
-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Beamer
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:
Hello,
I generate a presentation with beamer and I use the overlays option.
Thus I got 117 slides but only 47 pages.
I would like to print the complete 47 pages
Patrick Dupre pdupre at gmx.com writes:
I can have: \column{.49\texwidth}
But then, what I type goes into \column{}
If I make a return then I leave the column and go back to depth 1
How can I stay in the column (standard in depth 2?
Use increase depth after hitting Enter. The tool bar button
===
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 at 12:54 AM
> From: "Scott Kostyshak" <skost...@lyx.org>
> To: "Patrick Dupre" <pdu...@gmx.com>
> Cc: lyx <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>
> Subject: Re
"Scott Kostyshak" <skost...@lyx.org>
> > To: "Patrick Dupre" <pdu...@gmx.com>
> > Cc: lyx <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>
> > Subject: Re: Beamer
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Patrick Dupre <pdu...@gmx.com> wrote:
>
Patrick Dupre gmx.com> writes:
> I can have: \column{.49\texwidth}
> But then, what I type goes into \column{}
> If I make a return then I leave the column and go back to depth 1
> How can I stay in the column (standard in depth 2?
Use "increase depth" after hitting Enter. The tool bar button
Hello,
I generate a presentation with beamer and I use the overlays option.
Thus I got 117 slides but only 47 pages.
I would like to print the complete 47 pages and not the 117 slides.
How can I do it?
Thank.
===
Patrick
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:
Hello,
I generate a presentation with beamer and I use the overlays option.
Thus I got 117 slides but only 47 pages.
I would like to print the complete 47 pages and not the 117 slides.
How can I do it?
Hi Patrick,
Try
Hello,
I generate a presentation with beamer and I use the overlays option.
Thus I got 117 slides but only 47 pages.
I would like to print the complete 47 pages and not the 117 slides.
How can I do it?
Thank.
===
Patrick
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:
Hello,
I generate a presentation with beamer and I use the overlays option.
Thus I got 117 slides but only 47 pages.
I would like to print the complete 47 pages and not the 117 slides.
How can I do it?
Hi Patrick,
Try
Hello,
I generate a presentation with beamer and I use the overlays option.
Thus I got 117 slides but only 47 pages.
I would like to print the complete 47 pages and not the 117 slides.
How can I do it?
Thank.
===
Patrick
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Patrick Dupre <pdu...@gmx.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I generate a presentation with beamer and I use the overlays option.
> Thus I got 117 slides but only 47 pages.
> I would like to print the complete 47 pages and not the 117 slides.
> How
://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/21598/how-to-color-math-symbols
color - How does changing colour affect spacing? - TeX ...
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/47050/how-does-changing-colour-affect-spacing
So this seems related with latex and not so much with beamer.
--
José Abílio
Hello,
I wrote my own module for the algorithmicx package (see attached). The
algorithmicx package works fine with the article document class.
The module also mostly works for me with the Beamer document class. My
problem is with loops. The regular loop environment works. However, when I
try
://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/21598/how-to-color-math-symbols
color - How does changing colour affect spacing? - TeX ...
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/47050/how-does-changing-colour-affect-spacing
So this seems related with latex and not so much with beamer.
--
José Abílio
Hello,
I wrote my own module for the algorithmicx package (see attached). The
algorithmicx package works fine with the article document class.
The module also mostly works for me with the Beamer document class. My
problem is with loops. The regular loop environment works. However, when I
try
TeX - LaTeX Stack ...
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/21598/how-to-color-math-symbols
color - How does changing colour affect spacing? - TeX ...
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/47050/how-does-changing-colour-affect-spacing
So this seems related with latex and not so much with beamer.
--
José Abílio
Hello,
I wrote my own module for the algorithmicx package (see attached). The
algorithmicx package works fine with the article document class.
The module also mostly works for me with the Beamer document class. My
problem is with loops. The regular loop environment works. However, when I
try
Dear all,
I downloaded version 2.07 of Lyx into Windows 8.1. The Beamer Layout
in the Document Settings is marked as unavailable.
Is there any way to overcome this problem without leaving windows 8?
Thank you.
Misha Salganik
Is is possible to install a 2.1 version? There are a ton of bug fixes
between 2.0.X and a 2.1.X version. If that doesn't work, you might not have
the beamer file installed but I would try upgrading first.
http://www.lyx.org/Download
~Ben
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Mikhail Salganik
This typically indicates that the Beamer LaTeX package is either not
installed or not properly on the LaTeX search path. Have you installed it
under MiKTeX (assuming that's what you are using)?
Dear all,
I downloaded version 2.07 of Lyx into Windows 8.1. The Beamer Layout
in the Document Settings is marked as unavailable.
Is there any way to overcome this problem without leaving windows 8?
Thank you.
Misha Salganik
Is is possible to install a 2.1 version? There are a ton of bug fixes
between 2.0.X and a 2.1.X version. If that doesn't work, you might not have
the beamer file installed but I would try upgrading first.
http://www.lyx.org/Download
~Ben
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Mikhail Salganik
This typically indicates that the Beamer LaTeX package is either not
installed or not properly on the LaTeX search path. Have you installed it
under MiKTeX (assuming that's what you are using)?
Dear all,
I downloaded version 2.07 of Lyx into Windows 8.1. The Beamer Layout
in the Document Settings is marked as unavailable.
Is there any way to overcome this problem without leaving windows 8?
Thank you.
Misha Salganik
Is is possible to install a 2.1 version? There are a ton of bug fixes
between 2.0.X and a 2.1.X version. If that doesn't work, you might not have
the beamer file installed but I would try upgrading first.
http://www.lyx.org/Download
~Ben
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Mikhail Salganik
This typically indicates that the Beamer LaTeX package is either not
installed or not properly on the LaTeX search path. Have you installed it
under MiKTeX (assuming that's what you are using)?
Hello everyone
I have several beamer files that I generated from lyx 2.0.6 . We had to
change from XP to something else, and we went for CentOS. I managed to
install and run 2.1, after a brief period using 1.6 (the version present
in the repositories). It seems to run smoothly. However when I
On 06/17/2014 07:56 AM, Fabio Fiorelli wrote:
Hello everyone
I have several beamer files that I generated from lyx 2.0.6 . We had
to change from XP to something else, and we went for CentOS. I managed
to install and run 2.1, after a brief period using 1.6 (the version
present
Hello everyone
I have several beamer files that I generated from lyx 2.0.6 . We had to
change from XP to something else, and we went for CentOS. I managed to
install and run 2.1, after a brief period using 1.6 (the version present
in the repositories). It seems to run smoothly. However when I
On 06/17/2014 07:56 AM, Fabio Fiorelli wrote:
Hello everyone
I have several beamer files that I generated from lyx 2.0.6 . We had
to change from XP to something else, and we went for CentOS. I managed
to install and run 2.1, after a brief period using 1.6 (the version
present
Hello everyone
I have several beamer files that I generated from lyx 2.0.6 . We had to
change from XP to something else, and we went for CentOS. I managed to
install and run 2.1, after a brief period using 1.6 (the version present
in the repositories). It seems to run smoothly. However when I
On 06/17/2014 07:56 AM, Fabio Fiorelli wrote:
Hello everyone
I have several beamer files that I generated from lyx 2.0.6 . We had
to change from XP to something else, and we went for CentOS. I managed
to install and run 2.1, after a brief period using 1.6 (the version
present
.
Could you describe this in detail? Which document class, what kind of
Problem environment? If I use Problem from the Theorems module (or
Theorem from Beamer itself or similar), multiple returns do not get me to
Standard. The environment does not change. This is not to say that we could
not implement
environment, all I have to do is issue a couple of returns.
Could you describe this in detail? Which document class, what kind of
Problem environment? If I use Problem from the Theorems module (or
Theorem from Beamer itself or similar), multiple returns do not get me
to Standard. The environment
2014-05-08 9:26 GMT+02:00 aparsloe:
Environments like LyX-Code, Quotation, Quote, Verse and the four list
environments all resolve to Standard on two returns. (But Verbatim
doesn't. Perhaps it should?)
Oh, I see. This behavior obviously depends on whether KeepEmpty is true or
not. Frame
regards,
Murat
Julio Rojas mailto:jcredbe...@gmail.com
8 mai 2014 04:54
Dear Jürgen, there is no need for irony on your comments. Everybody is
doing an honest effort to work with the new Beamer environment.
You have quoted the behavior of other environments as the reference
for the Frame
2014-05-08 12:37 GMT+02:00 Murat Yildizoglu:
We had in the recent past some abusive criticisms in the list, but that
should not make us immediately adopt a defensive discourse when a new
criticism appears, especially if it is constructive and detailed as here.
Let me stress, in case it has
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Let me just rephrase that we cannot go back to the
2.0 UI (for the technical reasons I have explained in previous posts) and
Another wild idea: what about adding new frame environment containing the
previous separator by default (kind of 2.0 behaviour if user still
Another wild idea: what about adding new frame environment containing the
previous separator by default (kind of 2.0 behaviour if user still want to
go that way)?
Maybe for beginners it wouldn't be a bad idea. Alt-P Shift-Return is faster
for experienced users, though.
easy to forget. Cumbersome because you need to insert new
environment on places where information about new frame was enough. Changing
some document into beamer used to be breeze for me - if you want it fast just go
through document and turn sections into frames, delete some pargraphs and you
are
done
cumbersome in 90% of cases.
Fragile because it's easy to forget. Cumbersome because you need to insert new
environment on places where information about new frame was enough. Changing
some document into beamer used to be breeze for me - if you want it fast just go
through document and turn sections
for the hard work dudes. I will go back to my never-ending stream of
Beamer slides... ;)
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
On 05/08/2014 02:51 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Julio Rojas wrote
Theorems (and derivatives), I usually found
myself indenting these environments into a Frame, so indenting standard
text is kind of a natural extension for me.
Thanks for the hard work dudes. I will go back to my never-ending stream of
Beamer slides
into a Frame, so indenting standard
text is kind of a natural extension for me.
Thanks for the hard work dudes. I will go back to my never-ending stream of
Beamer slides...
I had been waiting until the end of my semester, and also waiting for
debian testing to go to 2.1, to upgrade. But I saw that debian
Nah, Liviu, thanks for the suggestion but downgrading is never a good
solution. I have been working this whole week with Beamer on 2.1 and let's
say that the new UI is the least of my concerns. ;)
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 8
.
Could you describe this in detail? Which document class, what kind of
Problem environment? If I use Problem from the Theorems module (or
Theorem from Beamer itself or similar), multiple returns do not get me to
Standard. The environment does not change. This is not to say that we could
not implement
environment, all I have to do is issue a couple of returns.
Could you describe this in detail? Which document class, what kind of
Problem environment? If I use Problem from the Theorems module (or
Theorem from Beamer itself or similar), multiple returns do not get me
to Standard. The environment
2014-05-08 9:26 GMT+02:00 aparsloe:
Environments like LyX-Code, Quotation, Quote, Verse and the four list
environments all resolve to Standard on two returns. (But Verbatim
doesn't. Perhaps it should?)
Oh, I see. This behavior obviously depends on whether KeepEmpty is true or
not. Frame
regards,
Murat
Julio Rojas mailto:jcredbe...@gmail.com
8 mai 2014 04:54
Dear Jürgen, there is no need for irony on your comments. Everybody is
doing an honest effort to work with the new Beamer environment.
You have quoted the behavior of other environments as the reference
for the Frame
2014-05-08 12:37 GMT+02:00 Murat Yildizoglu:
We had in the recent past some abusive criticisms in the list, but that
should not make us immediately adopt a defensive discourse when a new
criticism appears, especially if it is constructive and detailed as here.
Let me stress, in case it has
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Let me just rephrase that we cannot go back to the
2.0 UI (for the technical reasons I have explained in previous posts) and
Another wild idea: what about adding new frame environment containing the
previous separator by default (kind of 2.0 behaviour if user still
Another wild idea: what about adding new frame environment containing the
previous separator by default (kind of 2.0 behaviour if user still want to
go that way)?
Maybe for beginners it wouldn't be a bad idea. Alt-P Shift-Return is faster
for experienced users, though.
easy to forget. Cumbersome because you need to insert new
environment on places where information about new frame was enough. Changing
some document into beamer used to be breeze for me - if you want it fast just go
through document and turn sections into frames, delete some pargraphs and you
are
done
cumbersome in 90% of cases.
Fragile because it's easy to forget. Cumbersome because you need to insert new
environment on places where information about new frame was enough. Changing
some document into beamer used to be breeze for me - if you want it fast just go
through document and turn sections
for the hard work dudes. I will go back to my never-ending stream of
Beamer slides... ;)
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
On 05/08/2014 02:51 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Julio Rojas wrote
Theorems (and derivatives), I usually found
myself indenting these environments into a Frame, so indenting standard
text is kind of a natural extension for me.
Thanks for the hard work dudes. I will go back to my never-ending stream of
Beamer slides
into a Frame, so indenting standard
text is kind of a natural extension for me.
Thanks for the hard work dudes. I will go back to my never-ending stream of
Beamer slides...
I had been waiting until the end of my semester, and also waiting for
debian testing to go to 2.1, to upgrade. But I saw that debian
Nah, Liviu, thanks for the suggestion but downgrading is never a good
solution. I have been working this whole week with Beamer on 2.1 and let's
say that the new UI is the least of my concerns. ;)
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 8
gt; is issue a couple of returns.
>
Could you describe this in detail? Which document class, what kind of
"Problem" environment? If I use Problem from the Theorems module (or
Theorem from Beamer itself or similar), multiple returns do not get me to
Standard. The environment does
nd I want to get out of it into the
standard environment, all I have to do is issue a couple of returns.
Could you describe this in detail? Which document class, what kind of
"Problem" environment? If I use Problem from the Theorems module (or
Theorem from Beamer itself or similar), multiple retu
2014-05-08 9:26 GMT+02:00 aparsloe:
> Environments like LyX-Code, Quotation, Quote, Verse and the four list
> environments all resolve to Standard on two returns. (But Verbatim
> doesn't. Perhaps it should?)
>
Oh, I see. This behavior obviously depends on whether KeepEmpty is true or
not.
regards,
Murat
Julio Rojas <mailto:jcredbe...@gmail.com>
8 mai 2014 04:54
Dear Jürgen, there is no need for irony on your comments. Everybody is
doing an honest effort to work with the "new" Beamer environment.
You have quoted the behavior of other environments as the reference
2014-05-08 12:37 GMT+02:00 Murat Yildizoglu:
> We had in the recent past some abusive criticisms in the list, but that
> should not make us immediately adopt a defensive discourse when a new
> criticism appears, especially if it is constructive and detailed as here.
>
Let me stress, in case it
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Let me just rephrase that we cannot go back to the
> 2.0 UI (for the technical reasons I have explained in previous posts) and
Another wild idea: what about adding new frame environment containing the
previous separator by default (kind of 2.0 behaviour if user still
>
> Another wild idea: what about adding new frame environment containing the
> previous separator by default (kind of 2.0 behaviour if user still want to
> go that way)?
Maybe for beginners it wouldn't be a bad idea. Alt-P Shift-Return is faster
for experienced users, though.
e it's easy to forget. Cumbersome because you need to insert new
environment on places where information about new frame was enough. Changing
some document into beamer used to be breeze for me - if you want it fast just go
through document and turn sections into frames, delete some pargraphs a
cumbersome in 90% of cases.
Fragile because it's easy to forget. Cumbersome because you need to insert new
environment on places where information about new frame was enough. Changing
some document into beamer used to be breeze for me - if you want it fast just go
through document and turn sections
uot;, so
indenting standard text is kind of a natural extension for me.
Thanks for the hard work dudes. I will go back to my never-ending stream of
Beamer slides... ;)
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Richard Hec
r idea that this text belongs to this "Frame".
> Anyways, as I continuously use "Theorems" (and derivatives), I usually found
> myself indenting these environments into a "Frame", so indenting standard
> text is kind of a nat
es), I usually found
myself indenting these environments into a "Frame", so indenting standard
text is kind of a natural extension for me.
Thanks for the hard work dudes. I will go back to my never-ending stream of
Beamer slides...
I had been waiting until the end of my semester, and
Nah, Liviu, thanks for the suggestion but downgrading is never a good
solution. I have been working this whole week with Beamer on 2.1 and let's
say that the new UI is the least of my concerns. ;)
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 8
Julio Rojas wrote:
Thanks Scott,
This shortcut is quite useful in getting me over the old Frame
environment hangover. Nevertheless, while trying both methods another
problem appeared: To get out of the title of a Frame pressing return is
not enough. One has to use the arrows to get out of
On 05/07/2014 08:07 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Julio Rojas wrote:
Thanks Scott,
This shortcut is quite useful in getting me over the old Frame
environment hangover. Nevertheless, while trying both methods another
problem appeared: To get out of the title of a Frame pressing return is
not enough.
2014-05-07 17:02 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck:
One idea I had was to implement something corresponding to the Next
Style option in LibreOffice styles. So, e.g., if you are in a Frame
environment and you hit Return, then LyX would know NOT to make the next
line also a Frame, but instead to revert to
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
2014-05-07 17:02 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck:
One idea I had was to implement something corresponding to the Next
Style option in LibreOffice styles. So, e.g., if you are in a Frame
environment and you hit Return, then LyX would know NOT to make the next
line also a
2014-05-07 17:14 GMT+02:00 Neal Becker:
OK, I'm confused here. Let's consider workflow to make a bullet chart.
I was talking about the Standard paragraph, not Itemize.
Insert sep. Hit return.
Select Frame
Fill in Title
oops - return in title does nothing, navigate past title (right
After arrow right, return.
I can type some text. Looks nice. Oh, it's not nested in the frame. Hit
tab.
Now you have Frame inside Frame.
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
2014-05-07 17:14 GMT+02:00 Neal Becker:
OK, I'm confused here. Let's
Which brings up another question. Alt-A return? How could I have
discovered this? If I look at Help/Shortcuts, I don't see it (or am I
blind?)
I wish lyx had a way to discover things like emacs does.
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
After arrow right,
want to
nest Frame layout into Frame layout? It does not need to be nested. What
needs to be nested is all content of other layout. Again: this is by no
means an exotism of beamer frame, this is how environments work in LyX.
Also, this is clearly documented in the Beamer manual to which I pointed
you
2014-05-07 17:41 GMT+02:00 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com:
Which brings up another question. Alt-A return? How could I have
discovered this?
Reading the beamer manual perhaps? Also, the shortcut is displayed in the
respective menu (Edit). And it is also documented generally in the LyX
Dear Jürgen, there is no need for irony on your comments. Everybody is
doing an honest effort to work with the new Beamer environment.
You have quoted the behavior of other environments as the reference for the
Frame environment. If I am in a, for example, Problem environment and I
want to get
Julio Rojas wrote:
Thanks Scott,
This shortcut is quite useful in getting me over the old Frame
environment hangover. Nevertheless, while trying both methods another
problem appeared: To get out of the title of a Frame pressing return is
not enough. One has to use the arrows to get out of
On 05/07/2014 08:07 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Julio Rojas wrote:
Thanks Scott,
This shortcut is quite useful in getting me over the old Frame
environment hangover. Nevertheless, while trying both methods another
problem appeared: To get out of the title of a Frame pressing return is
not enough.
2014-05-07 17:02 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck:
One idea I had was to implement something corresponding to the Next
Style option in LibreOffice styles. So, e.g., if you are in a Frame
environment and you hit Return, then LyX would know NOT to make the next
line also a Frame, but instead to revert to
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
2014-05-07 17:02 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck:
One idea I had was to implement something corresponding to the Next
Style option in LibreOffice styles. So, e.g., if you are in a Frame
environment and you hit Return, then LyX would know NOT to make the next
line also a
2014-05-07 17:14 GMT+02:00 Neal Becker:
OK, I'm confused here. Let's consider workflow to make a bullet chart.
I was talking about the Standard paragraph, not Itemize.
Insert sep. Hit return.
Select Frame
Fill in Title
oops - return in title does nothing, navigate past title (right
After arrow right, return.
I can type some text. Looks nice. Oh, it's not nested in the frame. Hit
tab.
Now you have Frame inside Frame.
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
2014-05-07 17:14 GMT+02:00 Neal Becker:
OK, I'm confused here. Let's
Which brings up another question. Alt-A return? How could I have
discovered this? If I look at Help/Shortcuts, I don't see it (or am I
blind?)
I wish lyx had a way to discover things like emacs does.
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
After arrow right,
want to
nest Frame layout into Frame layout? It does not need to be nested. What
needs to be nested is all content of other layout. Again: this is by no
means an exotism of beamer frame, this is how environments work in LyX.
Also, this is clearly documented in the Beamer manual to which I pointed
you
2014-05-07 17:41 GMT+02:00 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com:
Which brings up another question. Alt-A return? How could I have
discovered this?
Reading the beamer manual perhaps? Also, the shortcut is displayed in the
respective menu (Edit). And it is also documented generally in the LyX
Dear Jürgen, there is no need for irony on your comments. Everybody is
doing an honest effort to work with the new Beamer environment.
You have quoted the behavior of other environments as the reference for the
Frame environment. If I am in a, for example, Problem environment and I
want to get
Julio Rojas wrote:
> Thanks Scott,
>
> This shortcut is quite useful in getting me over the old "Frame"
> environment hangover. Nevertheless, while trying both methods another
> "problem" appeared: To get out of the title of a "Frame" pressing return is
> not enough. One has to use the arrows to
On 05/07/2014 08:07 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Julio Rojas wrote:
Thanks Scott,
This shortcut is quite useful in getting me over the old "Frame"
environment hangover. Nevertheless, while trying both methods another
"problem" appeared: To get out of the title of a "Frame" pressing return is
not
2014-05-07 17:02 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck:
> One idea I had was to implement something corresponding to the "Next
> Style" option in LibreOffice styles. So, e.g., if you are in a Frame
> environment and you hit , then LyX would know NOT to make the next
> line also a Frame, but instead to revert to
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2014-05-07 17:02 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck:
>
>> One idea I had was to implement something corresponding to the "Next
>> Style" option in LibreOffice styles. So, e.g., if you are in a Frame
>> environment and you hit , then LyX would know NOT to make the next
>> line
901 - 1000 of 4762 matches
Mail list logo
