stamina challenge.
>
> --
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 1:34 PM
>
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [
*Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 1:34 PM
>
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
> E&S says Morgan has backed Curbishley
>
> On 14 February 2012 11:56, Steven Millward wrote:
>
>&g
b 2012 08:40:01 +1100
> To:
> ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
> Ouch! Looking liking a politician now Paul. Time to spin your way out.
>
>
>
> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
der: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:40:01 +1100
>> *To: *
>> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject: *RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>>
>> Ouch! Looking liking a politician now Paul. Time to spin your way out
gan gives Keegan a call!
> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
> --
> *From: *"Jeremy Tonks"
> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:40:01 +1100
> *To: *
> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject: *RE: [N
: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:40:01
To:
Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Ouch! Looking liking a politician now Paul. Time to spin your way out.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
ooglegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 10:10 AM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
> Do you really think Martin O'Neill would have come to
rds we needed a different
> manager.
>
> --
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Rog & Reet
> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 11:17 PM
>
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subj
first choice was O'Neill.
>
> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra****
> --------------
>
> *From: *Steven Millward
>
> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
>
> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:03:10 +1100
>
> *To: *
>
> *
AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Remember Paul, the NSWolves archive never forgets our mistakes.
Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com via googlegroups.com
23/12/2011
to nswolves
Simple Jeremy, Mark Hughes, the best candidate avai
erryR from Telstra
_
From: Steven Millward
Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:03:10 +1100
To:
ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Didn't you align yourself with Mark Hughes on a number o
requested to
>> contact the sender and delete the email.
>> --
>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
>> Behalf Of *paul
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 07:11
>> *To:* Nsw Wolves
>>
>>
rror, you are requested to contact the
> sender and delete the email.
> --
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *paul
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 07:11
> *To:* Nsw Wolves
>
> *Subject:* Re:
® from Telstra
> --
> *From: *Steven Millward
> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:03:10 +1100
> *To: *
> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
> Didn't y
ubject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Didn't you align yourself with Mark Hughes on a number of occasions? I
hear he's doing rubbish at QPR, albeit with lots of money.
On 14 February 2012 07:10, paul wrote:
Morgan will have someone lined up, just hope it is not
egan until the end of the season!
> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
> --
> *From: *Marcus Chantry
> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Date: *Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:46:29 +1100
> *To: *
> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject: *Re:
Steve's right - even Connor, with lots of money, could do the job.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 8:03 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASS
l the end of the season!
> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
> --
> *From: *Marcus Chantry
> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Date: *Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:46:29 +1100
> *To: *
> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Wolv
: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Now were actually in the prem it might be time for Hoddle again. He knows
the club and could inspire and develop our young team. He is also supposed
to be tactically astute
On 13/02/2012, at 11:14 PM, Marcus Chantry wrote:
i"d like to see someone
ay, 14 February 2012 7:46 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Bet Henry, Edwards, Berra and Stearman are a tad worried now.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Hart
Sent: Monday, 13 Februa
Bet Henry, Edwards, Berra and Stearman are a tad worried now.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Hart
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 9:43 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Make em
groups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 9:02 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Well he's been sacked. You all got what you wanted
On 13/02/2012, at 7:02 PM, "
Yeah!
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 6:25 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I shall hold you and Rog personally responsible if we
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
does anyone think we'd have a chance of enticing Gus Poyet away from Brighton?
On 13/02/2012, at 10:43 PM, Paul Hart wrote:
> Make em put a shift in
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 13/02/2012,
atteo
>>>
>>> 12/1 - Ole Gunnar Solksjaer
>>>
>>> 12/1 - Billy Davis
>>>
>>> 14/1 - Darren Ferguson
>>>
>>> 14/1 – Nigel Worthington
>>>
>>> 14/1 - Karl Robinson
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
t;> Pretty skinny odds when the field is not even known.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
>> Of Rog & Reet
>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 11:03 PM
>
;>>>>>> Nothing worked and we were woeful in the first half. Abysmal in the
>>>>>>> first half. I hate to say it but we were actually better in the second
>>>>>>> and got absolutely flogged.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
hen the field is not even known.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Rog & Reet
> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 11:03 PM
> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggi
>> first half. I hate to say it but we were actually better in the second
>>>>>> and got absolutely flogged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no midfield and our defense is pathetic. I don’t care if
t;>> bought Johnson so it was unrealistic to think we'd improve much.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
t;>>>>>>>>> one clanger). Johnston hopefully got an assist for one goal (he’s
>>>>>>>>>> in my fantasy team L). What is MM trying to do to Fletcher and
>>>>>>>>>> Miljas?
>>>>>>>>>>
s in
>>>>>>>>> my fantasy team L). What is MM trying to do to Fletcher and Miljas?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nothing worked and we were woeful in the first half. Abysmal in the
>>>>>>>>> first half. I hate
opefully got an assist for one goal (he’s in
>>>>>>>>> my fantasy team L). What is MM trying to do to Fletcher and Miljas?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nothing worked and we were woeful in the first half. Abysmal in the
>>
gt;>>>>>> my fantasy team L). What is MM trying to do to Fletcher and Miljas?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nothing worked and we were woeful in the first half. Abysmal in the
>>>>>>>>> first half. I hate
MM trying to do to Fletcher and Miljas?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nothing worked and we were woeful in the first half. Abysmal in the
>>>>>>>> first half. I hate to say it but we were actually better in the second
>>>>>>&g
s in the ground yesterday
>>>>>>>> who felt the same level of dissatisfaction, to the extent that many
>>>>>>>> were fighting amongst themselves.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> After scrapi
ay it but we were actually better in the second
>>>>>>> and got absolutely flogged.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no midfield and our defense is pathetic. I don’t care if we
>>&
Tevez and Ronaldo up front – they’d catch cold.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I’m not for changing managers – but I soon will be L
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthew Leese makes very go
;>>> and got absolutely flogged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no midfield and our defense is pathetic. I don’t care if we had
>>>>>> Tevez and Ronaldo up front – they’d catch cold.
>>
tic. I don’t care if we had
>>>> Tevez and Ronaldo up front – they’d catch cold.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I’m not for changing managers – but I soon will be L
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Matthew Leese mak
egroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 10:11 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I'd like to see if any of you are brave enough to put three realistic names
down as replacements
On 13/02/2012, at 10:0
old.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I’m not for changing managers – but I soon will be L
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthew Leese makes very good sense in his lengthy email.
>>>
old.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I’m not for changing managers – but I soon will be L
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthew Leese makes very good sense in his lengthy email.
>>
Ronaldo up front – they’d catch cold.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I’m not for changing managers – but I soon will be L
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Matthew Leese makes very good sense in his lengthy email.
>
last year and they thrashed us this year.
>>> So what?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of the
>>> Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go and
>>> su
ngthy email.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
>> Of Steven Millward
>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 6:51 PM
>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves
Oh my god it goes from bad to worse.
BRING BACK MICK.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 10:04 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Clipboard in
for changing managers – but I soon will be L
>
>
>
> Matthew Leese makes very good sense in his lengthy email.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Steven Millward
> Sent: Monday, 13 February
t; Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA
> wrote:
>
> I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now.
>
> Really don’t give a sh*t
googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 6:51 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how anyone
can say we lack pace.
I don't think t
n Millward
Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:50:41
To:
Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how anyone
can say we lack pace.
I don't think
h*t who replaces him: couldn’t be any worse.
>>
>> Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans.
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>> ------------------
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* nswolves@googlegrou
who replaces him: couldn’t be any worse.
>
> Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Morris, Lee SGT
> Sent: Monday, 13 Februar
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED
A bit late.
Funny thing is, QPR would have done th
olves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:59 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon duri
and was invaded.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:59 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Dear oh dear, it's a good job this gen
;
> Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Morris, Lee SGT
> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM
> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> Subjec
--
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT
> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
> ** **
&g
UNCLASSIFIED
I am becoming frustrated with many things at Wolves, but one thing
plainly obvious to me is that Ebanks Blake is totally out of his depth
in the Premier League, he takes far too long on the ball..again it was
obvious and pointed out by David Pleat last night.
For me the spark has gon
: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now.
Really don't give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn't be any worse.
Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans.
From
ps.com] On Behalf Of
Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED
A bit late.
Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men
IMPORTANT: This email remains the prope
UNCLASSIFIED
A bit late.
Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested t
62 matches
Mail list logo
