) in such an INTERNALCALL stackframe available? Maybe with a name like
METHODCONTEXT in case it is an INTERNALCALL with an EXECUTABLE being a method, .nil else?
---rony
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 6:27 AM Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
While experimenting and analyzing various traces I stumbled over
;hey" within the method reveals in full format that the attributepool id gets
changed from "A1" ("a TEST" target) to "A2" ("The NIL object").
Shouldn't the TARGET entry of called labels/internal routines within a method supply the reference
to the context object ("a TEST") rather than .nil ("The NIL object")?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
On 22.04.2024 18:02, ooRexx wrote:
On 22. Apr 2024, at 16:54, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
On 22.04.2024 15:24, ooRexx wrote:
... cut ...
AFAICT these are meant to initially match the release versions. In the case that minor changes
are applied to a released version and a minor release
On 22.04.2024 17:06, ooRexx wrote:
On 22. Apr 2024, at 16:54, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
On 22.04.2024 15:24, ooRexx wrote:
is it ok to branch off and create folders in the Sandbox branch?
A "sandbox" is an area where experiments can be carried out. In the ooRe
ng changes/additions to/deletions of files.
HTH,
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Committed with [r12834] <https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/code-0/12834/> (code) and [r12835]
<https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/code-0/12835/> (unit tests) after running the entire test suite.
---rony
On 21.04.2024 20:47, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Thinking about this probl
re reply ...
8 *-1* reply
*I2> Method "TEST_REPLY" with scope "TEST" in package
"G:\test\orx\trace\test_reply.rex".
9 *-2* say "after reply ..."
after reply ...
*As can be seen the invocation enter and exit tracelines
Terry, that is *great* that you have been able to overhaul it, thank you very
much!
---rony
On 20.04.2024 02:05, taf wrote:
Well, nevermind Just found svn info and I think I've got what I need.
On 2024.04.19 09.04, taf wrote:
Hello all,
I've finally gotten started on the website. I'm
n of the remainder on a new thread/activity. (In the current
form there is also no matching "
How about either removing ">I2>" or inserting an "I2>" to ">T2>"
(">T>") a new prefix indicating that the remainder gets executed on a new t
Hi P.O.,
thank you for your information and efforts!
How about targeting an initiative to create a new release (5.1.0) at the
beginning of June then?
Cheers
---rony
On 19.04.2024 19:01, ooRexx wrote:
A progress report on my activites today.
The test was partially successful, if you look
Changed the test to expect the NOMETHOD condition, cf. [r12830]
(https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/code-0/12830/).
---rony
On 11.04.2024 13:33, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hmm, there is one unexpected error in the test suite:
[error] 20240411 11:35:15.207000
Test
0/> (test units).
---rony
On 11.04.2024 11:53, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Enclosed please find the diff for adding the trace invocation exit traceline to complement the
trace invocation (>I>) traceline.
The reason is mainly to make sure that the changes are sensible and acceptable.
trace r*trace n -- <-- this line # 103*
Not sure whyt it does not trigger 97.1 as the other tests in this test unit do.
Will be able to adjust this test to not bring up an error, but before doing so the question, why
that would be the case? Why would the changes for the trace invocation exit
elease of ooRexx.
---rony
Index: interpreter/execution/RexxActivation.cpp
===
--- interpreter/execution/RexxActivation.cpp(revision 12827)
+++ interpreter/execution/RexxActivation.cpp(working copy)
@@ -512,7
ram with internal routines (indicated by a label, i.e. an identifier followed by a colon) which may get signaled or called. Trace label will trace those labels.—-rony
On 4/10/2024 7:40 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
Here an example program that uses a routine and met
\orx\trace\examples4docs\hmm\test_labels.rex".
18 *-* return res
>O> Method "HO" with scope "TEST" in package
"G:\test\orx\trace\examples4docs\hmm\test_labels.rex".
o~ho : [ho]
5 *-* say "pp(abc):" pp(abc)
>I> Routine "PP" in package
"G:\test\orx\trace\examples4docs\hmm\test_labels.rex".
8 *-* res=br(arg(1))
10 *-* br:
11 *-* return "[" || arg(1) || "]"
9 *-* return res
>O> Routine "PP" in package
"G:\test\orx\trace\examples4docs\hmm\test_labels.rex".
pp(abc): [ABC]
---
Personally I would prefer "I>" is internally dubbed
entering invocation) and it would probably make it easier to locate the invocation pairs in simple
runs.
So, if you compare the trace output what would you like better, what would you think is more
intuitive and maybe easier to spot? After all this is Rexx and should it make as easy as possible on
the programmers! :)
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
collected trace
objects. Among other things this could be used to create profiling data for routines and methods.
What do you think?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
On 03.04.2024 09:26, Chip Davis wrote:
Seems more Rexx-ish, unless its specification might conflict with a future usage of the term in
that context.
-Chip-
On 4/2/2024 4:19 PM, Rony wrote:
Another question: offline I got the suggestion to change the NR entry in TraceObject to NUMBER.
What do
! Will commit the changes to trunk shortly.
---rony
P.S.: As setMethod/unsetMethod are documented they will get used in the wild such that we should
attempt to remove the root cause eventually.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 8:26 AM Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
Thankfully Jean Louis was able
without a crash repeatedly]/
So there is maybe something to investigate around the impacts of this
assignement of
behaviour->copy()
... cut ...
Any idea what the problem might be and how to fix it?
---rony
P.S.: Thinking of notable things in this context:
* setMethod/unsetMethod in this
a private message
just now.
thank you very much!
Best regards
---rony
Am 04.04.2024 um 19:04 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher :
Am using an almost ten year old version of MVS (Microsfot Visual Studio), which was bought (but
due to lack of money has not been updated by buying an update, newer
the test suite)!
Again, if the crash occurs then only after running the test suite with "rexx testOORexx.rex -s -U"
from "test/trunk" in "test\trunk\ooRexx\base\runtime.objects\environmentEntries.testGroup". Running
that test group standalone does not crash here.
Any h
ws they do not
show these problems.
Very good!
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
On 03.04.2024 16:25, ooRexx wrote:
It seems we currently have ALL platforms failing this test, can the person (Rony?) who committed
lately check if there was a side-effect of the changes and/or amend the test to the new behaviour.
Executing .../ooRexx/base/runtime.objects
entries OBJECT and
SCOPE in TraceObject can be removed. Would there be any objections?
Another question: offline I got the suggestion to change the NR entry in
TraceObject to NUMBER. What do you think?
—-rony
Rony G. Flatscher (mobil/e)
> Am 29.03.2024 um 15:44 schrieb Rony G. Flatsc
After making sure that TEST.testgroup and TEST_TestObject.testgroup work, I committed 12814 (code)
and 12815 (doc) to see whether all tests keep on running on all platforms via Jenkins.
---rony
On 29.03.2024 15:43, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
While experimenting with TraceObjects for anaylsis
entry
would be the
receiver/self object in case of a method, so possibly one could save the
OBJECT entry above, as
it should be retrievable via the STACKFRAME entry.
What do you think?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourcefo
suite and b) the RexxLA Jenkins build system are
instrumental and extremely helpful for the ooRexx project!
---rony
On 27.03.2024 16:02, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
There were two new entries, docs and tests need to be supplied, hence reopened.
---rony
On 26.03.2024 15:53, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
There were two new entries, docs and tests need to be supplied, hence reopened.
---rony
On 26.03.2024 15:53, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
A few minutes ago I committed the test cases for
<<https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/feature-requests/825/> was updated:> ("TraceObject&q
Added entries OBJECTID and SCOPE with [r12808].
---rony
On 27.03.2024 14:47, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
On 27.03.2024 14:26, Rick McGuire wrote:
I also want to point out this was something I pointed out previously when I said that the lock
count was not a very useful piece of information
On 27.03.2024 14:38, Rick McGuire wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:33 AM Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
On 27.03.2024 14:16, Rick McGuire wrote:
The scope is not the variable pool that is used, it is rather the index
used to look up the
appropriate variable pool in the object
rhaps the identity hash)" + "method scope (to
identify the variable pool in question)" + "the lock count for the activity".
That will uniquely identify what the scope lock situation is.
How about an entry OBJECTID with the identity hash as a value?
---rony
On Wed,
variable pool.
Thank you for the explanation!
Would it be possible to determine whether a method instance got assigned as a class method, maybe
adding some method like isClassMethod? Maybe from within a method something like
".context~executable~isClassMethod"
---rony
On Wed, Mar 27,
oes not allow
for differentiating between the two scopes.
Maybe the ">I>" output could add something like '... scope "TEST" /at the class level /...' in the
case of a class method?
Also, it would be helpful to learn whether from a method object (if .c
ion in
(and its subdirectories):
BSF4ooRexx850/samples
Each sample directory has an index.html file that briefly describes the purpose of the samples in
that directory, just point your browser at these files.
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing l
the developers could look into this?
Cheers
---rony
P.S.: I do Linux from time to time because of BSF4ooRexx850 and the DBus library for ooRexx that I
wrote a couple of years ago, but this is quite rarely the case at the moment. Will return to Linux
as I plan to change how BSF4ooRexx850 gets created
has pointed out (see below)? Would anyone have
any suggestions, ideas, takers?
---rony
On 30.11.2023 08:56, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi Gil,
thank you very much!
On 29.11.2023 19:10, Gilbert Barmwater wrote:
I guess I need to refresh everyone's memory on this topic. When we released 5.
A few minutes ago I committed the test cases for
<<https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/feature-requests/825/> was updated:> ("TraceObject") which
concludes the work.
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists
Dear p.O.,wow, that is really cool!So any changes in the books will dhow up within minutes at https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/5.1.0beta/Bedt regsrds—-ronyRony G. Flatscher (mobil/e)Am 25.03.2024 um 14:51 schrieb P.O. Jonsson :Dear Rony,Since the build
be nice if additional feedback was based on these updated versions of rexxpg.pdf and
rexxref.pdf.
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
it.
---rony
On 24.03.2024 15:58, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
On 24.03.2024 15:48, Rick McGuire wrote:
if .context~executable~isa(.Method) then say .context~executable~scope
Wow, thank you very much for this pointer!
(I was not aware of the Method class allowing for retrieving it, which is
really great
On 24.03.2024 15:48, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
And WOW what a humongous piece of work not just implementing it but actually DOCUMENTING it! Hat´s
off.
:)
(Indeed time is a big problem, always. The test cases need to be done, which is
next on my TODO list.)
---rony
method to the new documentation in the next days
(after waiting a bit for any feedback).
---rony
On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 10:32 AM Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
While working on the multithreaded related parts it has become clear that the term
"scope" is
very
important, s
*Wow*, that was fast, the rendered PDF and HTML version is already online!
---rony
On 24.03.2024 14:52, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Writing up the documentation for the new TraceObject class and the new subchapter for debugging
multithreaded programs has turned out to be quite a hefty piece
e" would return it.
Would that be a sensible solution or are there better possibilities?
Maybe adding an entry "SCOPE" to the TraceObject instance and supplying the value that gets used for
the ">I>" trace line?
What do you think?
---rony
__
as a single xhtml (attention: use the base name of the
ebnf file for "exporting"/storing).
---rony
P.S.: For the rexxref book I recreated all svg-syntax diagrams from the xhtml
files.
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
ctions and suggestions to improve the
text.
Please also point out any errors or omissions that you find.
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
ring prepends it with the letter L
it should read:
"HASSCOPELOCK" .true/.false, makeString uses an asterisk, if .true, a
blank character else
(cf. "4.2.2. Scope")
"SCOPELOCKCOUNT" a number, makeString prepends it with the letter L (cf.
"4.2.2. Sc
to change anything in the
native code.
---rony
On 13.03.2024 19:21, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
There are two trace related tests in the test suite failing (all other pass):
[failure] 20240313 18:16:37.50
Test: TESTIOEXITTRACE
Class: RexxStart.testGroup
File: ...\oorexx
then return its traceLine entry instead of the trace exits generated
string "a TraceObject") or in native code? If in native code, where exactly should the change be
applied?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
h
Interestingly, creating a DEBUG version and using the testbinaries of it does
not cause the crash.
---rony
On 12.03.2024 16:47, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Will create a debug version of ooRexx with my version of the MS compiler and rerun the testsuite
to see whether that makes a difference
Will create a debug version of ooRexx with my version of the MS compiler and rerun the testsuite to
see whether that makes a difference (used Open Object Rexx Version 5.1.0 r12787, Build date: Feb 12
2024 from SourceForge with a privately built version of the testbinaries).
---rony
Here the screenshots:
followed by:
Then the location already reported in the previous mail will be shown again.
---rony
On 12.03.2024 16:28, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
While running the testsuite on Windoes with "testOORexx.rex" from test/trunk a heap related crash
occurs in the
d9() Unknown
rexx.dll!7ffbd3dd68f4() Unknown
rexx.dll!7ffbd3e1c7f1() Unknown
rexx.dll!7ffbd3e512a8() Unknown
rexx.dll!7ffbd3dfb020() Unknown
rexx.dll!7ffbd3e2d866() Unknown
... cut ...
Shall I open a bug report
1522.diff)
(26.5 kB; text/plain)
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
that only adds the thread, if not sufficient
choose any of the available ones and if a need that is not covered, define one owns formats (and
easily so).
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https
rt order using the value of the NR entry which is
the
creation sequence number.
r.3.x.7. makeString
This method will invoke the class method makeStringImpl supplying the
TraceObject
pointed to by the self variable as argument.
--- draft for class TraceObject (rexxref.pdf) - end ---
If there are questions, comments please use the ooRexx developer list on
sourceforge (https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/mailman/oorexx-devel/).
Temporary location:<https://wi.wu.ac.at/rgf/rexx/tmp/20240128_mt/>
2024-02-05, rgf
Any feedback is appreciated.
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
x~right(1)
return line prefixT rest
---rony
P.S.: got already the updated version such that you can
download and experiment for yourself (and with your own Rexx programs).
On 04.02.2024 16:48, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
There is a new version available at , which is regarded to
be
turn a string.
r.3.x.5. compareTo
Implements the default sort order using the value of the NR entry which is
the
creation sequence number.
r.3.x.6. makeString
This method will invoke the class method makeStringImpl supplying the
TraceObject
pointed
There is a new version available at , which is regarded to be
the final version.
Some changes:
* make traceLine align in S and F mode if object related information is not
present
* start work on traceutils.cls meant to get TraceObject related utilities, e.g.
"toJSON()" and
"toCSV()"
ull prefix prepended to trace line
For more information see class attribute OPTION and section "15.4 Debugging
Multithreaded Programs".
--- draft for class TraceObject (rexxref.pdf) - end ---
If there are questions, comments please use the ooRexx developer list on
sourceforge (https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/mailman/oorexx-devel/).
Temporary location:<https://wi.wu.ac.at/rgf/rexx/tmp/20240128_mt/>
2024-01-29, rgf
Again, any feedback welcome.
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
On 29.01.2024 11:04, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
Am 28.01.2024 um 17:32 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher :
The creation of the working test version has costed me already much more time
than budgeted.
Are you aware of any software project that didn’t ? ;-) You forgot the Pi
factor*
* „Every project
ng test version" is acceptable and does not have errors (and if
so, fixing them not being too time consuming).
Best regards
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
or she wishes.
The above web site includes Rexx test scripts that are only meant to demonstrate and test the
current implemtation.
The readme.txt file includes suggested drafts and is copied to this message at
the end.
Please post any feedback, findings, bugs here.
---rony
read
trace capabilities, including having the TraceObjects collected for
later analysis, should really have a low threshold such that it is easy to use. If a Rexx user does
not need the new features, he would not have to do anything special. A Rexx user wishing to exploit
the new features can do so hopefully w
copy and for the experimentation and exploring
phase implementing TraceObject in rexx.img.
---rony
... cut ...
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
ictionary.hpp
M memory/GlobalNames.h
M memory/RexxMemory.cpp
M memory/Setup.cpp
M platform/unix/SysInterpreterInstance.cpp
M platform/unix/SysInterpreterInstance.hpp
M platform/windows/SysInterpreterInstance.cpp
M platform/windows/SysInterpreterInstance.h
Ah, think I found a solution by using TheRexxPackage->findClass().
---rony
On 25.01.2024 14:51, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Experimenting with tracing and one idea that came up with was to also supply
Activation::getTime() which is an internal interpreter/classes/support/RexxDateTime obj
making the Activation::getTime()
information available as a .DateTime object to the Rexx programmer.
How would one become able to achieve that?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists
g/waiting (indicating a method currently guarded and waiting on the object's lock). This
would ease analyzing the trace log considerably, if interested to find the blocked statements in a
multithreaded program in case of deadlocks.
---rony
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 11:32 AM Rony G. Flatscher
UNT"],3), "
") -- L ... lock reserve count mb~append(self["ISLOCKED"]~?("*"," ")) --
asterisk to indicate
holding object lock (can execute) end mb~append("] ", self["TRACELINE"])
return mb~string --
return trace line with mt
an own class to format the traceline any way the programmer
sees as helpful as
described above
* no need for adding a new function to control mtPrefix , no need to change
anything in the TRACE
keyword statement nor in the TRACE() BIF (the language remains small)
---rony
___
"
thisName -- m_333 [R1 T4
I5 G V1 L1 ] 33 *-* say 'after sleeping (m_1)' sleepTime "seconds is OVER"
thisName -- m_1 [R1
T3 I6 U V1 L1 *] >>> "after sleeping (m_22) 0.002 seconds is OVER (M_22)"
after sleeping (m_22)
0.002 seconds is OVER (M_22) [R1 T2 I7 G V1 L1 ] >>> "after sleeping (m_333)
0.005 seconds is
OVER (M_333)" after sleeping (m_333) 0.005 seconds is OVER (M_333) [R1 T4 I5 G V1 L1
] >>>
"after sleeping (m_1) 0.01 seconds is OVER (M_1)" after sleeping (m_1) 0.01
seconds is OVER
(M_1) [R1 T3 I6 U V1 L1 *] 49 *-* say 'before guard off (m_22)' thisName --
m_22 [R1 T2 I7 G V1
L1 ] 65 *-* say 'before guard on (m_333)' thisName -- m_333 [R1 T4 I5 G V1
L1 ] 34 *-* say
'before guard on (m_1)' thisName -- m_1 [R1 T3 I6 U V1 L1 *] >>> "before
guard off (m_22)
(M_22)" before guard off (m_22) (M_22) [R1 T2 I7 G V1 L1 ] >>> "before guard on
(m_333) (M_333)"
before guard on (m_333) (M_333) [R1 T4 I5 G V1 L1 ] >>> "before guard on (m_1)
(M_1)" before
guard on (m_1) (M_1) [R1 T3 I6 U V1 L1 *] 50 *-* guard off -- m_22 [R1 T2 I7
G V1 L1 ] 66 *-*
guard on -- m_333 [R1 T4 I5 G V1 L1 ] 35 *-* guard on -- m_1 [R1 T3 I6 U V1
L0 ] 51 *-* say
'after guard off (m_22)' thisName -- m_22 (before returning) [R1 T2 I7 G V1
L1 *] 67 *-* say
'after guard on (m_333)' thisName -- m_333 (before returning) [R1 T3 I6 U V1 L1 ]
>>> "after
guard off (m_22) (M_22)" after guard off (m_22) (M_22) [R1 T2 I7 G V1 L1 *] >>>
"after guard on
(m_333) (M_333)" after guard on (m_333) (M_333) [R1 T4 I5 G V1 L1 *] 36 *-*
say 'after guard on
(m_1)' thisName -- m_1 (before returning) [R1 T4 I5 G V1 L1 *] >>> "after guard
on (m_1) (M_1)"
after guard on (m_1) (M_1)
What follows next is a proposal on how to activate the mtPrefix and how to allow Rexx programmers to
create their own mtPrefix.
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
?
---
If it was possible to display the blocking state it would augment the utility of the multithreaded
tracing prefix considerably, helping the ooRexx programmers to debug MT programs even more.
---rony
P.S.: If guarded methods do not get changed to unguarded while invoked it would be
to look if there is also a need to change the „Universal“ installer. I think Rony
must look at this.
Not sure what problem you see or what I should look after?
(Assuming that the packages will be created by accordingly.)
Cheers
---rony
___
Oorexx
Hi Greetz,
that is *quite* impressive!
Would you consider giving a presentation at this year's Rexx symposium about it?
Cheers
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo
of a Rexx program I
would suggest to use "Multithreading" as the argument name. "M" has not been used as an option in
the trace keyword statement nor in the trace()-BIF.
What do you think?
---rony
P.S.: Alternative names which seem to be less ideal would be "
be helpful to allow for universal user compiled Rexx programs as
well, as the same infrastructure could then be put in place, if not mistaken.
What do you think would such an endeavor be worthwhile at all?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx
creates a seemless integration
with your installed Java. All of Java becomes Rexx/ooRexx, no need to learn Java at all!
Please check it out and if you find bugs or have questions, then please let us
know!
Enjoy unlimited possibilities with this cool combination in an unmatched
easiness! It'll
On 07.01.2024 20:00, Rick McGuire wrote:
On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 1:21 PM Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
Is rexx.img dependent on the architecture and bitness?
Yes, it contains LOTS of binary data that depends on the bitness of the architecture. There are
some bits that might even
Is rexx.img dependent on the architecture and bitness?
With other words: can a rexx.img be used at the same time for arm64 and amd64
(Intel)?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net
ld I trigger a rebuild of the complete
documentation today, 1.1.2024? It's a nice date to remember :-)
Yes, this would be great as it would improve the documentation by correcting that little but
important information!
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mai
r instances
(each having its own .local) in a process and terminate them.
Therefore I kindly request any of the C++ experts to look into this matter if possible. Maybe the
upcoming vacation time allows for a few time slots to use for analyzing, finding and hopefully
fixing the cause of this showstopper
supplying this link!
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Had some unexpected time today (a holiday) such that I was able to tackle the
first item oleinfo:
* to document created feature request # 830 (#830 Add oleinfo scripts from
sandbox/rony/oleinfo,
https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/feature-requests/830/)
* committed with [r12746], changes can
for you or for anyone else on this list to give a helping hand? The more
shoulders carry this load the easier for each individual and the faster can the clean up go?
(Personally, I will probably only be able to get enough free time again during the New Year vacation
and would like to focus on the &q
Hi Michael,
AFAIK nothing has happened since then. Would you be interested in taking this
on?
Cheers
---rony
On 24.11.2023 01:43, Michael Lueck wrote:
Greetings ooRexx team,
Reminder of Rick's prior email...
Begin Forwarded Message
Subject: [Oorexx-devel] I think
There has been a good amount of work on this but I'd really want to see ALL of
them completed. Thanks!
Could you point them out (unfortunately, I have no idea what you mean or which bugs and RFEs are
affected)?
---rony
On 11/23/2023 3:51 PM, Rony G Flatscher wrote:
Dear P.O.,
fine, arou
Dear P.O.,fine, around end of January for planning a release of 5.1 would be fine!Best regards —ronyRony G. Flatscher (mobil/e)Am 23.11.2023 um 10:28 schrieb P.O. Jonsson :Dear Rony,I have no preferences regarding your proposals, for me you can go ahead and implement them.Regarding a 5.1.0
Given some free time I would like to add the following things to ooRexx 5.1:
* the Windows oleinfo Rexx utilities from the sandbox
(https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/code-0/HEAD/tree/sandbox/rony/oleinfo/)
o planned for being placed as is in a new directory
ooRexx/samples/ole/oleinfo
am uses gc() and
runFinalization() right before terminating the Rexx engine or not. At that time there are no ooRexx
related threads anymore, so probably the crash occurs in one of the Java shutdown threads. So
wondering whether ooRexx causes thread related side effects in this case as Java is quite
bul
Gil,
On 27.10.2023 17:19, Gilbert Barmwater wrote:
Glad to see that you are back "in the saddle" so to speak! Rony and I have been working off-list
to implement a mechanism to automate the updating of the information in the "Edition" of each
book. I have done the change i
then would be to
check whether a Rexx instance is inactive such that instead of terminating an instance it would get
reused instead.
Would that be a feasible approach?
---rony
P.S.: Also, once Termination (1.17.188. Terminate in rexxapi.pdf) gets fixed (cf.
https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs
Time passes too quickly.
@Rick: do you have any intentions to implement the ideas you have communicated?
---rony
On 25.03.2023 16:58, Rick McGuire wrote:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 11:52 AM Gilbert Barmwater wrote:
Let me see if I've got this. If there was a class, perhaps a subclass
+1
---rony
On 22.09.2023 22:26, René Jansen wrote:
+1
On 22 Sep 2023, at 19:55, Sahananda Sahananda wrote:
Hi Terry,
It looks like you are not a committer. I believe that Erich as the project manager could convey
that right on you. In the old days that would follow a poll of all
;>ooRexx docs
~~~
and it should go immediately above the comment
~~~
~~~
If no one else feels this is their task, I could take it on.
Yes, please do! It is really important to get everything up to the latest state
once the state changes!
Best
s":"https://swapi.dev/api/starships/"}]
---
d: a Directory d~items: 6
listing entries:
1: idx=[films] [https://swapi.dev/api/films/]
2: idx=[people]... [https://swapi.dev/api/people/]
3: idx=[planets].. [https://swapi.dev/api/planets/]
4
lease
documentation steps if necessary!
---rony
On 27.08.2023 13:38, oorexx wrote:
Dear all,
At the moment the building of the documentation is manually triggered, since Jenkins cannot find
SVN on the build machine (it is there and works, unclear why Jenkins does not detect it). Whe
On 15.08.2023 17:46, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Using the latest 64-bit version of ooRexx (oorexx-5.1.0-12718.windows.x86_64.exe) I noticed that
Jean Louis' commits to the documentation [r12715] for his enhancements to the WindowsClipboard
class is not reflected in the documentation that gets
that the GA
version of the documentation gets distributed with it.
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
1 - 100 of 1892 matches
Mail list logo
