Thanks Richard.
CPU seems to be fine, spiking slightly as each animation is played in the
famo.us web page.
I turned on pulse logger and this is some of the output:
*FINEST: uri: [
I am not sure I like the name of the value DEFAULT. To me default
implies some kind of typical option for the particular platform which
could conceivably be very different on each platform. For example, on my
Windows super-computer with ultra fast GPU the default would logically be
something
Not sure why the output is not appearing with Eclipse but here is the
output using the command line:
On 24 July 2013 07:38, Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com wrote:
A whole pile of output to standard out. Is it being redirected??
Richard
On Jul 23, 2013, at 1:51 PM, Felix Bembrick
Well if it's to do with CSS3 then why did it work with JavaFX 2?
On 24 July 2013 08:55, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
Windows 7 64-bit here.
On 24 July 2013 08:53, Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com wrote:
I've filed https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-31885, lets
Do you have an example URL?
On 24 July 2013 09:04, Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com wrote:
Another good one to look at in terms of performance is impress.js, which
looks pretty dang good in web view.
Richard
On Jul 23, 2013, at 4:00 PM, Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com wrote:
without jittering so why then do simple animations (such
as those from Ensemble) perform so poorly?
On 25 July 2013 02:02, Artem Ananiev artem.anan...@oracle.com wrote:
On 7/24/2013 2:55 AM, Felix Bembrick wrote:
Windows 7 64-bit here.
On this platform, JavaFX web component is compiled
Artem, I don't think you can blame the slowness of WebView and
famo.usentirely on the lack of JIT as the 64-bit Qt WebView is also
based on
WebKit and that site peforms extremely well with it.
On 25 July 2013 20:21, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
I have noticed something
Hi Tobi,
I know how you feel. As much as I am impressed with JavaFX, clearly its
long-term survival does depend on it being viable on mobiles and tablets.
All I can say is don't give up yet. I am certainly not giving up. I
really hope we see something at JavaOne this year that will please us
.
-- Jonathan
On 9/08/2013 9:02 a.m., Felix Bembrick wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for your reply.
I am a little restricted in exactly what I can reveal about my plans for
this control but I can say that it is one in which its very appearance
could change quite significantly in a dynamic way
controls?
Felix
On 9 August 2013 07:31, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
T
hanks Jonathan.
I'll have to check out the virtualisation that you refer to that's going
on in JavaFX8 with TableView., it sounds very interesting.
I am not saying that controls such as what I am
Scott,
That JIRA issue doesn't make any mention of getting hooks into pixel data
etc., it only refers to user defined codecs.
Maybe you could open another issue to manage the wishlist of missing
features such as the ones you referred to? I too would very much like to
see greatly improved media
I have a very good feeling about JavaOne this year. It's now or never for
Java/JavaFX on mobiles and tablets and judging by the session titles, I
think Oracle is going to make a lot of people very happy :-)
On 9 August 2013 16:26, Daniel Zwolenski zon...@gmail.com wrote:
Wtf? Oracle guys,
I am preparing another blog about JavaFX and would like to know what
changes and enhancements there are in JavaFX between JDK7 and JDK8.
For me the most obvious one is the entire 3D functionality but would it be
possible for someone from Oracle or another person in the know to list the
major
, 2013, at 7:50 PM, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am preparing another blog about JavaFX and would like to know what
changes and enhancements there are in JavaFX between JDK7 and JDK8.
For me the most obvious one is the entire 3D functionality but would it
be
possible
Thanks Jonathan :-)
On 17 August 2013 13:28, Jonathan Giles jonathan.gi...@oracle.com wrote:
You have the right controls that are new in 8.0.
-- Jonathan
Sent from a touch device. Please excuse my brevity.
Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
OK, thanks
/browse/RT-138
Support component orientation in common UI
controlshttps://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-138
On Aug 16, 2013, at 7:50 PM, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am preparing another blog about JavaFX and would like to know what
changes and enhancements
Nicolas, is that something that is going to be addressed in the future? If
so, do you know when these (essential) features will be added?
Felix
On 22 August 2013 09:47, Nicolas Lorain nicolas.lor...@oracle.com wrote:
There has been no change at this point
On 8/21/13 4:25 PM, Pedro Duque
-dev/2013-March/006725.html
-- Jonathan
On 30/08/2013 7:06 a.m., Felix Bembrick wrote:
I was not privy to the original discussion but I am lead to believe that
Builders are no longer considered fashionable and that we are advised not
to use them.
While I realise that every type of Node
No, you are *not* the only one. We *all* need it. In fact, without it
happening soon, JavaFX is already dead.
But let's not give up yet. Perhaps it's closer than we know. I am a glass half
full kinda guy :-)
On 30 Sep 2013, at 16:40, Tobias Bley t...@ultramixer.com wrote:
I suppose
widgets, RoboVM for Android, RoboVM using OpenJDK, … I really love useful
stuff like the „JavaFX maven plugin“ or the „AquaFX“ project. That kind of
development we need!
Best,
Tobi
Am 30.09.2013 um 08:50 schrieb Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com:
No, you are *not* the only one. We
/Android widgets, RoboVM for Android, RoboVM using OpenJDK, … I really
love useful stuff like the „JavaFX maven plugin“ or the „AquaFX“ project.
That kind of development we need!
Best,
Tobi
Am 30.09.2013 um 08:50 schrieb Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com:
No, you are *not* the only one
.
BUT: There is a ARM based version for embedded space available as beta
version since a long time… so it’s important to TALK to the community.
Otherwise Java and JavaFX == Oracle. No need to open source it.
Am 30.09.2013 um 11:48 schrieb Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com:
I urge everyone *not* to walk
+1
On 30 September 2013 20:25, Sebastian Rheinnecker
sebastian.rheinnec...@yworks.com wrote:
Agree, this would make posting SSCCE so much easier, I always have to
plain write them into the description of the bug report, which is ugly...
Kind regards,
Sebastian Rheinnecker
Am 30.09.2013
30.09.2013 um 12:13 schrieb Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com:
Hey, I am trying to hose-down the political talk! I encourage everyone to
take a deep breath and focus on the many positives of the awesome
technology that is JavaFX :-)
On 30 September 2013 20:03, Hervé Girod herve.gi
skins, Android
skins, iOS/Android widgets, RoboVM for Android, RoboVM using OpenJDK, … I
really love useful stuff like the „JavaFX maven plugin“ or the „AquaFX“
project. That kind of development we need!
Best,
Tobi
Am 30.09.2013 um 08:50 schrieb Felix Bembrick
felix.bembr...@gmail.com
I agree. If the inability to provide 100% WORA for a particular feature
results in 0% availability then that is a fail.
I would rather the feature was available where it worked. At least we can
build apps with those features on those platforms.
On 3 October 2013 18:51, Tom Schindl
Perhaps having more than one JVM on iOS/Android implementation is good for
JavaFX as a whole?
On 14 October 2013 10:06, Rafal rafal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11.10.2013 18:53, Richard Bair wrote:
How much time do you think it would take community designers to develop
this?
RoboVM for iOS I
This is really great news!
Is the fact that the VP6 decoder is not included because of a legal issue?
On 19 October 2013 10:39, Pedro Duque Vieira pedro.duquevie...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks Kirill, good job.
You guys had already a working prototype of an app that recorded audio and
video. I
Does JavaFX support VP8 and, if not, when will it support it?
On 19 October 2013 11:16, Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com wrote:
Is the fact that the VP6 decoder is not included because of a legal
issue?
Yes, we don't own the code (Google does!) so we can't release it. Google
has
Hi Richard,
Undoubtedly you are aware of the buzz and confusion regarding possible
porting of JavaFX to iOS and Android and in an effort to calm the masses
and give us all a little hope, would you be kind enough to provide
definitive answers to the following questions?
1. Can you provide me with
of things, but I just don't see the need for
such a tight constraint???
Regards,
David
On Oct 22, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Even the most fab skins or CSS is not going to get us away from the need
to
integrate JavaFX controls with true native
with Swing and the Windows LnF and except for the file dialog, nobody
cared.
Scott
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well I guess I am in the once bitten, a thousand times shy category
after
my experiences with Swing over the years.
As I
Yes, having viable implementations of both options would be ideal.
How long till Oracle and/or the community gets to that point? ;-)
On 23 October 2013 10:06, Stephen F Northover
steve.x.northo...@oracle.comwrote:
Rather than arguing this point, the correct answer is to provide both and
let
Scene Builder 2.0 has very serious performance issues (on my machines at
least).
When running 1.1 2.0 side-by-side, 1.1 is very responsive and behaves
very well. On the contrary, 2.0 is extremely sluggish with a few seconds
between clicking on a control and the selection handles appearing and
Why does the text Custom Color.. that appears when the colour selections
appear in the drop-down section of ColorPicker use two dots (i.e. ..)
instead of an ellipsis or three dots (i.e. ...) at the end of the text?
The ellipsis is a standard scientific and mathematical symbol and is of
course
What we do know is that Oracle are working on something and that RoboVM
is already out there. We also know that RoboVM has serious limitations
such as being based on the Android class library, not supporting JDK 8 or
OpenJDK or invokedynamic etc. so is not really a viable solution at this
stage.
at
doing
so.
Instead of a man for himself kind of effort we should have a kind of
corporate like structure with the intricacies of being a group of
volunteers...
On Nov 9, 2013 1:21 PM, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com
wrote:
What we do know is that Oracle are working
schrieb Artem Ananiev artem.anan...@oracle.com:
On 11/7/2013 10:11 AM, Felix Bembrick wrote:
Scene Builder 2.0 has very serious performance issues (on my machines at
least).
When running 1.1 2.0 side-by-side, 1.1 is very responsive and behaves
very well. On the contrary, 2.0 is extremely
I for one will find the code and design of Scene Builder very useful as
examples of advanced usage of JavaFX so thanks to the SB team :-)
Felix
On 4 December 2013 07:44, Philipp Dörfler phdoerf...@gmail.com wrote:
Yay! Seems Christmas is early this year :)
Am 03.12.2013 um 16:04 schrieb
@Stephen, you are absolutely right about this. But such an approach (and
pretty much *any* approach) to emulated native look and feels is fraught
with difficulties and complexities.
Firstly, it will *never* be possible to completely emulate the native look
and feel. And, even if the differences
On 9 December 2013 16:10, Scott Palmer swpal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 8, 2013, at 9:18 PM, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
Firstly, it will *never* be possible to completely emulate the native
look
and feel.
Sure it is. Though it may never be practical
on this subject.
On 9 December 2013 19:10, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 December 2013 16:10, Scott Palmer swpal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 8, 2013, at 9:18 PM, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
Firstly, it will *never* be possible to completely
for reasons which he did not completely explain.
Pedro, do you mind expanding on those thoughts here? When you referred to
the numerous issue with iOS were you referring to iOS itself or to trying
to emulate iOS with JavaFX?
Thanks,
Felix
On 9 December 2013 20:24, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr
of
default animations. When creating a Look and Feel for mobile systems a set
of additinal panes / layout containers need to be created.
Hendrik
Am 09.12.2013 um 10:36 schrieb Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com
:
BTW, I was wanting to refer to a comment on this topic made my Pedro DV
and browsers.. Fully native
apps can be non-compliant with the platforms look and feel. So this isn't
really a Java-specific issue.
Scott
On Dec 9, 2013, at 4:24 AM, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
Spoiler: This is something I have become intensely passionate about so
:18, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
@Stephen, you are absolutely right about this. But such an approach (and
pretty much *any* approach) to emulated native look and feels is fraught
with difficulties and complexities.
Firstly, it will *never* be possible to completely
.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Felix Bembrick
felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
Stephen, I thoroughly agree that JavaFX is by far the best choice for
non-native apps/widgets which is precisely my point. They are the kind of
apps perfect for using JavaFX.
But you refer to giving people
Northover steve.x.northo...@oracle.com
wrote:
Today, you can only exercise the choice by writing native code and you face
heavyweight / lightweight issues depending on the platform and API.
Steve
On 2013-12-09 12:31 PM, Felix Bembrick wrote:
Stephen, I thoroughly agree that JavaFX is by far
these things and code for them explicitly. Where
is the abstraction in the Java APIs?
Scott
On Dec 9, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am with you on the design pattern approach you refer to which is
basically a higher level of abstraction than say one which
this happen but there
wasn't the band width and resources.
Steve
On 2013-12-09 1:00 PM, Felix Bembrick wrote:
What can we expect from the JavaFX team in this regard in the future?
I know we have talked about mixing lightweight and heavyweight
controls in the same context but is it going to happen
it.
Steve
On 2013-12-10 1:35 PM, Felix Bembrick wrote:
Stephen, why do you refer to this discussion as academic?
Felix
On 11 December 2013 05:20, Stephen F Northover
steve.x.northo...@oracle.com wrote:
Yes, if it helps an application ship using the components and technology
they need
with the
limitations.
Steve
On 2013-12-10 3:03 PM, Felix Bembrick wrote:
Do you think it's either feasible or viable to the extent that a
successful implementation would not have the limitations such as lack of
transparency or be limited by the inability to apply Node transforms and
functionality to native
I just watched the excellent presentation by Gerrit Grunwald Use the force
Luke on Parleys and in it he mentions that one of the key ways to improve
performance is to limit the number of nodes in the scenegraph. He also
mentions that on such devices as the Raspberry Pi the maximum number of
nodes
for complex graphic
work in JavaFX. It is very limited, I think intentionally. For example you
end having a lot of work to do even if you want to make a small change to
an existing scene. Nodes are much more powerful.
Hervé
Sent from my iPhone
On 30 déc. 2013, at 00:15, Felix Bembrick
animate
a couple of those nodes at 60fps if you done make too big a area dirty.
Performance issues are one of two things too much SceneGraph work or too
much Graphics card work. You can use pulse logger to determine which issue
you are having.
Jasper
On Dec 29, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Felix
Having watched the presentation from Stephen and Felipe about integrating
JavaFX and native technologies such as OpenGL, I am inspired to work on a
solution for my own needs for fast rendering of thousands of objects using the
techniques in the video which I would then contribute to the
and we can follow up there. Even if we don't fix the JIRA, we can capture
the information for other that might want to do the same thing.
Steve
On 2014-01-13 1:19 PM, Felix Bembrick wrote:
Having watched the presentation from Stephen and Felipe about integrating
JavaFX and native
I am bucking the naming trend with my product FXMark which will be released
in the next month or so. I named it in honour of the much-used 3D
benchmarking software 3DMark and the name sounded better than MarkFX.
FXMark allows the user to select and benchmark a series of animations and
effects on
Classic post Steve :-)
On 15 Feb 2014, at 10:35, Stephen F Northover steve.x.northo...@oracle.com
wrote:
Hello all,
Mark it on your calendar. Feb 25th is OpenJFX Lambda day. On that day, we
will lock the code base, lambdify everything in sight, and then open up for
business again.
Isn't that because they need to use the Dalvik Java classes and JDK 8 is
not supported with Dalvik?
On 21 February 2014 05:22, Stephen F Northover steve.x.northo...@oracle.com
wrote:
On 2014-02-19 12:46 PM, Johan Vos wrote:
Is there a policy on the location where properties are defined?
I
Very impressive Jeff! I'd really love to see you build some complex animations
with SnapCode and add in effects etc.
Keep up the great work! We really need apps that showcase the awesomeness and
potential of JavaFX.
Cheers,
Felix
On 22 Feb 2014, at 7:22, Jeff Martin j...@reportmill.com
I am keen to try out the latest JavaFX 8 builds but is anyone able to
download snapshot builds of JDK 8 at the moment? The JDK 8 snapshots
builds link does not behave as a link for me.
There hasn't been a new release of Scene Builder in over 2 months (unless I
am accessing stale links). Is one on the horizon?
Felix
to refresh the early access builds on OTN after b14.
We hope the final (GA) bits will be available in a couple weeks. Stay
tuned.
-Simon.
On 15/04/14 12:32, Felix Bembrick wrote:
There hasn't been a new release of Scene Builder in over 2 months (unless
I
am accessing stale links). Is one
Why do tooltips and context menus matter? Is it because they will later be
instantiated on the wrong thread when they pop up?
On 27 Apr 2014, at 7:04, Tom Schindl tom.schi...@bestsolution.at wrote:
If you don't use Tooltips context menus you can construct the scenegraph in
any thread.
gesendet
Am 27.04.2014 um 05:14 schrieb Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com
:
Why do tooltips and context menus matter? Is it because they will later
be instantiated on the wrong thread when they pop up?
On 27 Apr 2014, at 7:04, Tom Schindl tom.schi...@bestsolution.at
wrote:
If you
You said so eloquently what I was trying to say so lamely!
On 27 April 2014 16:36, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool, thanks.
On 27 April 2014 16:35, Tom Schindl tom.schi...@bestsolution.at wrote:
Read the jira ticket i referenced in my initial reply - tooltips
LinkedIn
openjfx-dev@openjdk.,
I'd like to include you in my network to share updates and stay in touch.
- Felix
Felix Bembrick
Development Lead at Bembrick Software Labs
Sydney Area, Australia
Confirm that you know Felix Bembrick:
https://www.linkedin.com/e/j4bywu-huvxdeup-6l
am sorry to anyone else
who receives such a message.
Felix
On 7 May 2014 11:06, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
LinkedIn
openjfx-dev@openjdk.,
I'd like to include you in my network to share updates and stay in touch.
- Felix
Felix Bembrick
Development Lead
I absolutely agree that such a feature is critical for the success and
longevity of JavaFX. I am *really* hoping for some heavily beefed-up 3D
support in a JFX 8.* release or JFX 9.
I need my graphics toolkit (currently JavaFX) to be able to handle
everything from simple UIs with basic controls
Still embarrassed over spamming this entire list with a LinkedIn request
some time ago, it looks like I am not the only one who fell victim to their
aggressive policies...
http://readwrite.com/2014/06/13/linkedin-lawsuit-privacy-terms-of-service
There's an impressive list of JavaFX-related content at this year's JavaOne.
Good to see both iOS and Android featured!
Enterprise JavaFX [CON2341]
https://oracleus.activeevents.com/2014/connect/sessionDetail.ww?SESSION_ID=2341JavaFX
offers a lot of awesome features for creating modern,
Gosh, that formatted badly.
Here's a link to the actual list:
https://oracleus.activeevents.com/2014/connect/search.ww?eventRef=javaone#loadSearch-event=nullsearchPhrase=JavaOne%2C+JavaFXsearchType=sessiontc=0sortBy=p=i(10009)=10111
On 19 June 2014 20:09, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr
Let's be a little bit more positive here guys...
From the link I posted you can see that there is a ton of JavaFX content at
JavaOne this year which is a very. very good sign in itself.
And, as I said, both iOS and Android are mentioned with featured sessions.
This is *new* in the sense that
Community members such as Gerrit Grunwald have already demonstrated an
application with a single JavaFX code base running on Windows, MacOS,
Linux, Android, iOS and even Raspberry Pi.
BTW, I totally disagree with you on your comments about the similarities of
the desktop UIs and some sort of
As can be seen in the issue notes, I do not believe this issue is Not an
issue and really needs to be fixed.
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-36146
I hope everyone concerned about the quality of font rendering on Windows
with JavaFX looks at this issue and adds their comments.
Felix
Java applets were the first programs to run inside a web browser and for
a (little) while they were flavour of the month.
But then along came Flash which had several advantages such as faster load
times, consistent loads and antialiased fonts/graphics and soon completely
surpassed applets.
But
Bair richard.b...@oracle.com wrote:
I’m afraid at this time there are no plans for adding an
animation/transition effect editor to Scene Builder, certainly not in the
short-term.
Thanks
Richard
On Nov 13, 2014, at 7:34 PM, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Java applets were
at replacing flash, HTML and
javascript are doing a great job there, hence animations are not equally
important as they were for flash.
Tom
On 24-11-2014 10:46, Felix Bembrick wrote:
I am surprised more people have not expressed an opinion on this. To me,
it seems absolutely *vital* to the long
focussed on animation. Actually that is why Adobe created Flex, which
basically was flash-for-developers (instead of animators). JavaFX is more a
alternative for Flex than Flash.
Tom
On 24-11-2014 11:20, Felix Bembrick wrote:
Really? My point is, why have such good built-on classes
On 25 November 2014 at 17:24, Tom Eugelink t...@tbee.org wrote:
the question is, should it be working good in one area or only half in two?
That's an age-old problem I guess Tom. Personally I feel that traditional
forms/dialogs based applications have enough support in Scene Builder as it
is
Hi Prasant,
I have been working on just such a beast for much longer than I had
intended (family commitments, illness, wedding to organise, you know) which
I call *FXMark*.
I had originally intended to release *FXMark* earlier this year but in
reality it won't be out there until after my wedding
Yes Fabrizio, I agree with you. First it was iOS, then Android and now
ARM. Oracle the company seem to view JavafX or their support for it as just
a fancy Swing replacement to run exclusively on desktop operating systems
like Windows, MacOS and Linux. But can we even trust that they will
Will they ever be supported?
On 17 March 2015 at 10:14, Kevin Rushforth kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com
wrote:
Media and web have not ever been supported or delivered on linux-arm.
Seems that libjfxmedia.so should be excluded by the openZips target. David
can response further.
-- Kevin
As awesome as JavaFX is right now, for me it's greatest weakness especially
when compared to competing products is it's extremely rudimentary support for
3D graphics. Even the old Java3D was considerably more advanced.
Is beefing up 3D support in JFX9 seen as a priority and if so what features
Anyone?
Felix
On 22 Apr 2015, at 14:35, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
What about:
1) Custom shaders
2) 3D Canvas
Felix
On 22 April 2015 at 11:37, Kevin Rushforth kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com
wrote:
Of these, handling transparency / blending is likely for JDK 9
for 9, but will consider
additional RFEs if they are important to enough developers and if they fit
into the time frame.
-- Kevin
Felix Bembrick wrote:
Anyone got anything or is there a link somewhere that talks about these?
On 15 June 2015 at 22:00, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr
support (with API control) on Mac, Windows, Linux.
We don't currently plan any other big features for 9, but will consider
additional RFEs if they are important to enough developers and if they fit
into the time frame.
-- Kevin
Felix Bembrick wrote:
Anyone got anything
Why are you asking me?
On 28 June 2015 at 05:24, Mike mikeg...@gmail.com wrote:
Felix how many full time Engineers does Oracle have on Javafx and Java?
How does this break up? How many open source contributors are Committing
often?
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Felix Bembrick
Anyone got anything or is there a link somewhere that talks about these?
On 15 June 2015 at 22:00, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
I realise we are a long way off JDK 9 still and with crucial features such
as Jigsaw still a little up in the air but is it possible someone could
I realise we are a long way off JDK 9 still and with crucial features such as
Jigsaw still a little up in the air but is it possible someone could itemise
the most likely new features, enhancements and bug fixes that we will see in
JavaFX when JDK 9 is released?
Of course it's purely
Has anyone had a look at this, done some work on it or can provide some
details as to its progress?
Thanks,
Felix
On 11 June 2015 at 13:50, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
I am following this one closely and hoping that some progress has been
made and that a fix is planned
I am following this one closely and hoping that some progress has been made
and that a fix is planned but it's difficult to determine from the JIRA
issue.
Does anyone have any additional info on where this issue is at?
Thanks,
Felix
of the total advance.
I do not know what API or client produced the 'native' rendering.
And what if someone else wants something different again ?
So I am not sure when we will get to looking into this and
deciding if it makes sense.
-phil.
On 06/14/2015 02:31 PM, Felix Bembrick wrote:
Has anyone
-DPI support
(with API control) on Mac, Windows, Linux.
We don't currently plan any other big features for 9,
but will consider additional RFEs if they are
important to enough developers and if they fit into
the time frame.
-- Kevin
Felix Bembrick wrote:
Anyone got
Felix Bembrick wrote:
Anyone got anything or is there a link somewhere
that talks about these?
On 15 June 2015 at 22:00, Felix Bembrick
felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
I realise we are a long way off JDK 9 still and
with crucial features such as Jigsaw still a
little
, especially with the advent
of unity, webgl or even scenegraph impls such as jmonkeyengine that do.
Sent from my iPhone
On 30 Jun 2015, at 09:42, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
coughJavaFX has *never* claimed to be write once, run anyway/cough
On 30 Jun 2015, at 18:13, Mike
, roll up my sleeves
and get my hands dirty, what can i do as a lowly developer to help?
Sent from my iPhone
On 30 Jun 2015, at 12:16, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well, we are all at the whim of Oracle executives decisions with the
added help of third parties
I just installed JavaFX on my new Windows 10 machine which is extremely
powerful but has two 4K monitors and while everything looks great and the right
"size", the performance is very sluggish to say the least.
Is this because Hi-DPI is not yet supported in JavaFX on Windows?
Thanks,
Fix
Hi Johan,
Have you been able to find enough time to be able to answer this question? In
my present situation, clarity on these issues is extremely important to me and
I would guess to many others as well.
Thanks,
Felix
> On 18 Oct 2015, at 19:01, Felix Bembrick <felix.bembr...@gma
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
