Hi all
I'd like to use this weeks meeting to discuss and prioritise
the summit sessions (these need to be published before the 28th).
There a lot of proposals that need more info, if you want these to succeed
you need to put some work into them.
-Angus
Dear all,
We proposed a new blueprint (at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129116/)
for booting up a large number of homogeneous VMs in a very short period
of time. This feature may be targeted to the Kilo version.
All requirements, suggestions and comments are welcome.
Thank you!
VMThunder
Igor, congratulations! Will be happy to see even more thorough reviews from
you!
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Aleksey Kasatkin akasat...@mirantis.com
wrote:
+1
Aleksey Kasatkin
Hi everyone!
I would like to propose Igor Kalnitsky as a core reviewer on the
Fuel-web team. Igor has
Facing this issue on trying to start a devstack installation
Tried with an existing as well as new installation.
42201 CRITICAL keystone [-] DBConnectionError: (OperationalError) (2013,
'Lost connection to MySQL server during query') 'ALTER TABLE domain ADD
CONSTRAINT ixu_domain_name UNIQUE
Greetings,
Since we need to do a final discussion on the design session topics, I'm
moving today's meeting to our second reserved time slot. That is,
instead of being at 15 UTC, the meeting will be at 21 UTC.
The main reason is that I won't be able to join our meeting at 15 UTC
since I'll be
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 09:04:20PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
Hi,
In discussion of this spec proposal:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/127827/ it was suggested by Joe Gordon
to start a discussion on the mailing list.
So I'll share my thoughts and a long term plan on adding FreeBSD
Rajdeep, I did couple of different devstack runs today and did not run into
any issue as you mentioned.
Can you give more information about your installation? localrc contents
would help
Best Regards,
Swapnil Kulkarni
irc : coolsvap
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Rajdeep Dua
Swapnil,
Thanks for your response, i tried after running ./clean.sh and it worked on
a new installation.
I wonder if it was a local issue i was facing
Thanks
Rajdeep
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Swapnil Kulkarni cools...@gmail.com
wrote:
Rajdeep, I did couple of different devstack runs
On 19/10/14 12:52, Rajdeep Dua wrote:
Hi,
I need to pass two values in the link generated from the table.Column as
shown below.
class DatasourcesTablesTable(tables.DataTable):
data_source = tables.Column(column1, verbose_name=_(Column1))
id = tables.Column(id, verbose_name=_(ID),
On 10/13/2014 03:20 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I’ve put together a little script to generate a report of the projects using
modules that used to be in the oslo-incubator but that have moved to
libraries [1]. These modules have been deleted, and now only exist in the
stable/juno branch of the
Hi,
1. From where the MPLS traffic will be initiated ?
2. How it will be mapped ?
Regards,
Keshava
From: Damon Wang [mailto:damon.dev...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 12:42 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
Hi, everyone,
NOTE: I am moving this discussion into openstack-dev@ as we plan to
deprecate fuel-...@lists.launchpad.net mailing list.
Regarding the problem discussed:
could you please add a bit more details about this versioning and how
should it fit into our build process.
Let's say we have
Hi all,
I am working with Ceilometer, Havana-All-in-one on Ubuntu 12.04. Initially,
ceilometer configuration installed four ceilometer services:
ceilometer-agent-central
ceilometer-agent-compute
ceilometer-api
ceilometer-collector
but later I came to know that there should be two other services
I'm agree with Dmitry. We can change version text. Use '2014.2-6.0-pre' in
openstack.yaml and '6.0-pre' in PRODUCT_VERSION. Yep, we need to test it
first. Also think about sorting on ui and other places where we can compare
versions.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova
I'm glad to announce release of Murano 2014.2 code-named Juno. This
release includes 39 implemented blueprints and 140 bugfixes. Source
tarballs along with detailed list of features and bugfixes can be
found at the following link:
https://launchpad.net/murano/+milestone/2014.2
Release notes:
- Original Message -
From: Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 6:56:15 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Horizon and Keystone: API Versions and
- Original Message -
From: Ben Meyer ben.me...@rackspace.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: Jamie Painter jamie.pain...@rackspace.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 4:31:16 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Question regarding Service Catalog and
Identity
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, david jhon wrote:
2014-10-20 16:33:07.854 30437 TRACE ceilometer.alarm.service
CommunicationError: Error communicating with http://193.168.4.121:8777
[Errno 111]$
2014-10-20 16:33:07.854 30437 TRACE ceilometer.alarm.service
How do I fix it?
It looks like it may be that
- Original Message -
From: Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 2:25:35 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][policy][keystone] Better Policy Model and
Representing Capabilites
On 10/13/2014 01:17 PM, Morgan
Hi Andrey,
Generally I'm opposed to such changes enabling random PEP8 checks, but
in this particular case I kind of like the fact you fix the mess with
indents in the code.
python-novaclient code base is fairly small, CI nodes are not
overloaded at this point of the release cycle, code looks
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote:
See answers inline. I don't have any concrete answers as to how to deal
with some of questions you brought up, but I do have some more detail
that may be useful to further the discussion.
That seems like progress to me.
Personally, I would like to
I am trying to understand why lxml is only in test-requirements.txt... The
default pipelines do contain xml_body and xml_body_v2 filters, which
depends on lxml to function properly.
Since lxml is not in requirements.txt, my packaging system won't include
lxml in the deployment drop. At the same
Thanks. Yes, it is up and running again!
From: Joshua Hesketh
joshua.hesk...@rackspace.commailto:joshua.hesk...@rackspace.com
Reply-To: OpenStack List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 at 3:45 AM
To: OpenStack List
+1
that's a great way to state it Sam.
regards,
mike
- Original Message -
Hi Amit,
Keeping in mind this viewpoint is nothing but my own personal view, my
recommendation would be to not mandate the use of a particular validation
framework, but to instead define what kind of
On 10/20/2014 08:12 AM, Jamie Lennox wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ben Meyer ben.me...@rackspace.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: Jamie Painter jamie.pain...@rackspace.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 4:31:16 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Question
Hi all,
I have a question re the deprecation strategy for the request_id module,
which was identified as a candidate for removal in Doug's recent message[1],
as it's moved from oslo-incubator to oslo.middleware.
The problem I see is that oslo-incubator deprecated this in Juno, but
(AFAICS) all
Hi,
Thanks for your response Chris, Ceilometer-api
Pls let me know if /etc/ceilometer/ceilometer.conf file is correct:
[DEFAULT]
#
# Options defined in ceilometer.middleware
#
# Exchanges name to listen for notifications (multi valued)
http_control_exchanges=nova
http_control_exchanges=glance
Does this mean we're losing request-id's?
Will they still appear in the Context objects?
And there was the effort to keep consistent request-id's in cross-service
requests, will this deprecation affect that?
-S
From: Steven Hardy [sha...@redhat.com]
Thanks for the clarification Sam.
Its good to know where the mission of the API working group starts and
stops. During the meetup discussions, my understanding was that the
working group would recommend the technologies to use while building apis
(e.g. Pecan, validation frameworks, etc) and were
Hi guys,
*Romans' questions:*
I feel like we should not require user to unpack the plugin before
installing it.
Moreover, we may chose to distribute plugins in our own format, which we
may potentially change later. E.g. lbaas-v2.0.fp.
I like the idea of putting plugin installation
I guess my only concern would be whether either of those things are
contentious (both sound like must-do's at some point) and whether there
is anything on either topic that requires f2f conversation to resolve.
There's a spec out for Cinder HA already
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101237/)
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.com
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 6:56:15
On 10/20/2014 10:26 AM, Amit Gandhi wrote:
Thanks for the clarification Sam.
Its good to know where the mission of the API working group starts and
stops. During the meetup discussions, my understanding was that the
working group would recommend the technologies to use while building apis
On 10/20/14, 10:38 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/20/2014 10:26 AM, Amit Gandhi wrote:
Thanks for the clarification Sam.
Its good to know where the mission of the API working group starts and
stops. During the meetup discussions, my understanding was that the
working group
On 20 October 2014 15:38, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/20/2014 10:26 AM, Amit Gandhi wrote:
Thanks for the clarification Sam.
Its good to know where the mission of the API working group starts and
stops. During the meetup discussions, my understanding was that the
working
On 10/20/2014 6:53 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote:
See answers inline. I don't have any concrete answers as to how to deal
with some of questions you brought up, but I do have some more detail
that may be useful to further the discussion.
That seems like
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 02:17:54PM +, Sandy Walsh wrote:
Does this mean we're losing request-id's?
No, it just means the implementation has moved from oslo-incubator[1] to
oslo.middleware[2].
The issue I'm highlighting is that those projects using the code now have
to update their
Phew :)
Thanks Steve.
From: Steven Hardy [sha...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 12:52 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] request_id deprecation strategy question
On Mon, Oct
As hopefully everyone is aware by now, the format of this summit will
be somewhat different from previous summits. Monday will be dedicated
to an Ops Summit, and Tuesday is dedicated to cross-project
discussions. Wednesday and Thursday are project-specific design
tracks, and on Friday projects
Thanks for joining us today at #openstack-meeting.
Meeting minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-10-20-16.02.html
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-10-20-16.02.html
Full log:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote:
On 10/20/2014 6:53 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote:
See answers inline. I don't have any concrete answers as to how to deal
with some of questions you brought up, but I do have some more detail
that may be useful to
After today’s meeting, we have filled our seven session slots. Here’s the
proposed list, in no particular order. If you think something else needs to be
on the list, speak up today because I’ll be plugging all of this into the
scheduling tool in the next day or so.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/16/2014 11:09 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
First step in fixing this, put a cap on it:
https://review.openstack.org/129125
To get the maximums down to more reasonable levels, I have two patches
that bring the libvirt driver _get_guest_config() from
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Andrey Kurilin akuri...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi everyone!
I'm working on enabling E12* PEP8 rules in novaclient(status of my work
listed below). Imo, PEP8 rules should be ignored only in extreme cases/for
important reasons and we should decrease a number of
I'm running OpenStack Icehouse with Neutron ML2/OVS. I've configured the
ml2-ovs-plugin on all nodes with host = the IP of the host itself.
However, my dhcp-agent may float from host to host for failover, so I
configured it with host=floating. That doesn't work. In this case, the
ml2-ovs-plugin
Hi Dan, Dan, Nikola, all Nova devs,
OK, so in reviewing Dan B's patch series that refactors the virt
driver's get_available_resource() method [1], I am stuck between two
concerns. I like (love even) much of the refactoring work involved in
Dan's patches. They replace a whole bunch of our
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting on Tuesday October 21st, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone
One of the big goals for the Kilo cycle by users and developers of the
cells functionality within Nova is to get it to a point where it can be
considered a first class citizen of Nova. Ultimately I think this comes
down to getting it tested by default in Nova jobs, and making it easy
for
Hi Noel,
The ML2 plugin uses the binding:host_id attribute of port to control
port binding. For compute ports, nova sets binding:host_id when
creating/updating the neutron port, and ML2's openvswitch mechanism
driver will look in agents_db to make sure the openvswitch L2 agent is
running on
The issue I'm highlighting is that those projects using the code now have
to update their api-paste.ini files to import from the new location,
presumably while giving some warning to operators about the impending
removal of the old code.
This was the issue i ran into when trying to switch
OK, so in reviewing Dan B's patch series that refactors the virt
driver's get_available_resource() method [1], I am stuck between two
concerns. I like (love even) much of the refactoring work involved in
Dan's patches. They replace a whole bunch of our nested dicts that are
used in the
On 2014-10-20 2:00 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
One of the big goals for the Kilo cycle by users and developers of the
cells functionality within Nova is to get it to a point where it can be
considered a first class citizen of Nova.
[...]
Shortcomings:
Flavor syncing
This needs to be
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy
rbogorods...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi,
In discussion of this spec proposal:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/127827/ it was suggested by Joe Gordon
to start a discussion on the mailing list.
So I'll share my thoughts and a long term plan
Chris,
Use case point well taken :-)
I'll propose something via a spec to ceilometer for sensor naming which
will
include the ability to support the new health sensor information.
From a use case perspective, I want to provide the health of every
platform
so an administrator can be notified
Hi,
* On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com
blak...@gmail.com wrote: I think you will probably have to
wait until after the summit so we can see the direction that will be
taken with the rest of the in-tree drivers/plugins. It seems like we
are moving towards
As I’ve established oslo.db blueprints which will roll out new SQLAlchemy
connectivity patterns for consuming applications within both API [1] and tests
[2], one of the next big areas I’m to focus on is that of querying. If one
looks at how SQLAlchemy ORM queries are composed across
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote:
Le 15/10/2014 11:56, Christopher Yeoh a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Alex Xu x...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 2014年10月15日
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Vadivel Poonathan
vadivel.openst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
* On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com
blak...@gmail.com wrote: I think you will probably have to
wait until after the summit so we can see the direction that will be
On 10/16/2014 03:18 PM, Dave Walker wrote:
On 16 October 2014 20:07, David Stanek dsta...@dstanek.com wrote:
SNIP
I may be missing something, but can you use the external auth method with
the LDAP backend?
No, as the purpose of the LDAP backend is to validate user/pass
combination are valid.
On 10/16/2014 02:58 PM, David Chadwick wrote:
Dave
when federation is used, the user's group is stored in a mapping rule.
So we do have a mechanism for storing group memberships without using
LDAP or creating an entry for the user in the SQL backend. (The only
time this is kinda not true is if
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Jim Mankovich wrote:
I'll propose something via a spec to ceilometer for sensor naming which will
include the ability to support the new health sensor information.
Excellent.
Do you happen to know what some of the use cases are for the current
reporting of sensor
Thanks, Robert.
So, ML2 needs the host attribute to match to bind the port. My other
requirement is that the dhcp agent must be able to migrate to a new host on
failover. The issue there is that if the dhcp service starts on a new host
with a new host name, then it will not take over the
is Cinder capable today to use Barbican for encryption?
Yes, Cinder has a KeyManager abstraction, and one of the implementations is
Barbican. Checkout cinder.keymgr.barbican.py. We have successfully used
Barbican within Cinder.
I think the python-barbicanclient has recently changed. This change
Hi all,
I took an action item in one of the meetings to try and find a date/time/space
to do another NFV BoF session for Paris to take advantage of the fact that many
of us will be in attendance for a face to face session.
To try and avoid clashing with the general and design summit sessions I
Chance we can move the congress session from Monday 14:30-16:00 to co-locate
Tuesday with GBP? either before or after...
~ sean
On Oct 7, 2014, at 1:25 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Sylvain Bauza wrote:
I only see 3 slots for discussing about other projects. Do you know if
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:12 AM, gordon chung g...@live.ca wrote:
The issue I'm highlighting is that those projects using the code now have
to update their api-paste.ini files to import from the new location,
presumably while giving some warning to operators about the impending
removal
Hi Andrew,
great that you have started the “cells” discussion.
Looking forward to see cells as default setup in Kilo.
The feature gap is really painful for current cells users.
We are looking into these features for some time and the main concern is
really where
these concepts should live.
I've been working on failover for dhcp and L3 agents. I see that in [1],
multiple dhcp agents can host the same network. However, it looks like I
have to manually assign networks to multiple dhcp agents, which won't
work. Shouldn't multiple dhcp agents automatically fail over?
[1]
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:44:15 -0500
Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote:
I think adding APIImpact will be useful.
I also want to point to the addition of Compute v2 (haven't yet
proposed a spec for v2.1) to the nova-specs repo here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129329/
The goal
I made a similar comment to the Triple-O design summmit etherpad in hopes
others have a similar interest in Kilo but I wanted to share evangelize my
thoughts with the community for discussion:
For better or for worse, one thing I've heard over and over is how
Openstack community/TC
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:38:58 -0400
Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
For stackers who are interested in different validation frameworks
to implement validation, I recommend checking out Stoplight.
Just my two cents on this particular topic, I think it's more
important to standardize
Hi all,
I was reminded in the Ironic meeting today that the words hardware
discovery are overloaded and used in different ways by different
people. Since this is something we are going to talk about at the
summit (again), I'd like to start the discussion by building consensus
in the language that
Hi Boris,
Does rally provide any synchronization mechanism to synchronize between
multiple scenario, when running in parallel? Rally spawns multiple processes,
with each process running the scenario. We need a way to synchronize between
these to start a perf test operation at the same time.
On 10/20/2014 07:11 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all,
I was reminded in the Ironic meeting today that the words hardware
discovery are overloaded and used in different ways by different
people. Since this is something we are going to talk about at the
summit (again), I'd like to
On 10/15/2014 11:49 AM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
Now that we have an API working group forming, I'd like to kick off some
discussion over one point I'd really like to see our APIs using (and
I'll probably drop it in to the repo once that gets fully set up): the
difference between synchronous and
Hi Amit,
Thanks for picking this topic up,
Honestly I don't have a strong opinion about validation libraries.
Each project implements based on different web frameworks and
the options of validation libraries would be limited from its web
framework. For example, Nova implements its own wsgi
I'm glad to see there's more than one interested person here too :)
Regarding the Xen-specific host maintenance mode, if it gets dropped I
would not complain since it's useful only to those running Xen at the
moment. The issues around when it works and doesn't work are my
bigger concern - as
With the move to removing nova-baremetal, I'm concerned that portions
of os-cloud-config will break once python-novaclient has released with
the bits of the nova-baremetal gone -- import errors, and such like.
I'm also concerned about backward compatibility -- in that we can't
really remove the
- Original Message -
However I don't think we should be mandating specific libraries, but we
can make recommendations (good or bad) based on actual experience. This
will be especially useful to new projects starting up to benefit from
the pain other projects have experienced.
+1
i
when checking the nova/api.log , I found the following entry as below
2014-10-20 11:26:11.387 3549 INFO nova.osapi_compute.wsgi.server
[req-d7cc3757-f1e3-4af9-8700-a6f7fa096a6b None] 10.104.0.138 GET
/v2/896bfb02c3f945d8a397c79f0741557a/os-floating-ips HTTP/1.1 status: 200
len: 192 time:
The current suggested way for DHCP agent fault tolerance is multiple agents
per network. Is there a reason you don't want to use that option?
On Oct 20, 2014 5:13 PM, Noel Burton-Krahn n...@pistoncloud.com wrote:
Thanks, Robert.
So, ML2 needs the host attribute to match to bind the port. My
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Steve Kowalik ste...@wedontsleep.org
wrote:
With the move to removing nova-baremetal, I'm concerned that portions
of os-cloud-config will break once python-novaclient has released with
the bits of the nova-baremetal gone -- import errors, and such like.
Nova
See dhcp_agents_per_network in neutron.conf.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1174132
2014-10-21 6:47 GMT+08:00 Noel Burton-Krahn n...@pistoncloud.com:
I've been working on failover for dhcp and L3 agents. I see that in [1],
multiple dhcp agents can host the same network. However, it
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Kenichi Oomichi oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp
wrote:
Hi Amit,
Thanks for picking this topic up,
Honestly I don't have a strong opinion about validation libraries.
Each project implements based on different web frameworks and
the options of validation
Hi Chris,
2014-10-21 13:41 GMT+09:00 Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Kenichi Oomichi oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp
wrote:
Hi Amit,
Thanks for picking this topic up,
Honestly I don't have a strong opinion about validation libraries.
Each project
85 matches
Mail list logo
