How about if we send them to the CVS mailing list on java.net?
-Original Message-
From: Rene Gielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 2:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] [JIRA-OS] Commented: (WW-271)
Converter framework needs to be able
actions
ok, so I can just not worry about these errors then?
I tested both orion and tomcat using IE and mozilla.
Anders Engström wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 06:20:33AM -0700, Jason Carreira wrote:
I may be wrong, but these look like common errors that you will get
when dealing
Did you write unit tests for it? :-)
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Braid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 8:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WW2- Improving ServletRedirectResult
I've comitted this code into HEAD at java.net
an existing model.
Cheers,
Cameron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
Jason Carreira
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August 2003 3:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] [JIRA-OS] Commented: (WW-271) Converter
framework
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will receive the Jira issue events
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 1:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] [JIRA-OS] Commented: (WW-271)
Converter framework needs to be able to
Sorry about this. It was necessary to allow multiple messages per field,
especially when I added the VisitorFieldValidator to call validations on
sub-objects.
I'm not sure why Mike put doDefault() in ActionSupport... It's going to
go away when I refactor out the workflow from ActionSupport and
Sorry, Matt Ho's our go-to guy on the tags and he's been moving :-)
Matt, if you have a chance, can you take a look at this?
-Original Message-
From: Armond Avanes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 1:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] #tag( Form
Title: Message
When
you say "On the page I have created a java.util.List called
"companies"." what do you mean?
The
tag will look for a property name 'companies' in your Action with a
getCompanies() method. Depending on which WebWork version you're using (1.x or
2.0) there's different
ValidationAware, it checks if it has any errors
using hasErrors(). If it does have errors, it returns Action.INPUT.
If it hasn't returned already, it invokes the ActionInvocation to allow
the rest of the Interceptors and the Action to be executed.
Jason
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp
ww:select label="'Company'"
name="'companyId'" list="companies" listKey="'id'"
listValue="'name'"/
/ww:propertyinput type="submit"/
/form webwork:iterator
value="errors"
brwebwork:property/
/webwork:iterator/td/tr/table/p
Awesome! Should that be:
WebWork2 contains the following items by default in the
**VelocityContext**?
Great work Matt!
-Original Message-
From: Matt Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 8:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Velocity in ww2
I'm not sure what the tabbed pane is looking for. How much separation
are you looking for? I think they all use the expression language and
ValueStack. It should be possible to use them without hitting an action,
and some work has been done on the WW2 side to make this work. I'm not
sure about
think this would go a long way to addressing people's concerns about
ease of use (how much easier can it get without a GUI to hold your hand
and eventually strangle you :-)?)
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax: 585.272.8118
email: [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 1:48 AM
To: Jason Carreira
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] A Proposal: Opensymphony Conductor
have come, but it's certainly not a new
idea.
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Jason Carreira wrote:
I'd like to create an opensource web application framework
built on
the pieces we have and some outside libraries. Essentially I'm
looking at something like Expresso but built with better
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone:585.240.2793
fax:585.272.8118
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm)
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built
Title: Message
That
tag probably hasn't been ported to WW2... I don't think it's going to be very
feasible to use the tags without the framework. WebWork is not really about
building a set of JSP tags, its a web application framework with some tightly
integrated JSP tags which make use of
Yep, and the clover jar file too (if you want to do a dist, which does a
clover report)
-Original Message-
From: Tracy Snell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 11:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Testing Xwork
On 8/31/03 10:19 PM,
I believe that allows the hierarchy of component managers (request -
session - application)
-Original Message-
From: James Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 11:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] DefaultComponentManager (fallback?)
Is
What's the error?
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Braid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 11:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Testing Xwork
My previous post :
I can't seem to get the xwork ant test target to run :(
I
also tried adding junit and ant optional top my
classpath.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Carreira
Sent: Monday, 1 September 2003 2:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Testing Xwork
What's the error
If you can send your app, I can look. The usual reason for the problem you're seeing
is not having the form fields have the right name, so it can't be mapped to your
action properties. Is your password property on the Action itself, or in a sub-object?
Make sure the return type for the getter
See below:
-Original Message-
From: Michal Mosiewicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Why is that...
I'm just taking my hands on webwork/xwork. Very nice, cool
and simple solutions comparing to what
Fors:
2.0
Versions:
2.0
Assignee: Jason Carreira
Reporter: Jason Carreira
Created: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 9:14 AM
Updated: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 9:14 AM
Description:
The ActionTag does not execute its view, so you cannot use them to
create
That sound like a bug.
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] losing session token when using
ServletRedirectResult
currently using ServletRedirectResult
Hey,
A while back some people said they were working on getting started
tutorials. Any status on those? If you have them, even in unfinished
states, you could put them up on the Wiki and let everyone add to it.
Sometimes all it takes is a start and structure for people to add to.
Jason
--
Jason
I got it, but haven't had time to look yet. I'll take a look tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt
Jason, guys ...
I've
:
-
Key: WW-281
Summary: WW2 problem w/ WLS 6.1
Type: Bug
Status: Assigned
Priority: Critical
Project: WebWork
Fix Fors:
2.0
Versions:
2.0
Assignee: Jason Carreira
Reporter
I think you have to tell it to encode the URL... Someone stop me if I'm
off track :-)
-Original Message-
From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] losing session token when using
having to create a dummy
doDefault() method in their action that did nothing.
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 8:50 PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] re. UI tags as standalone component
That tag
://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/Chat+Application
Will continue to flesh it out tonite.
- Original Message -
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 10:19 PM
Subject: [OS-webwork] Getting started tutorial
Hey,
A while back some
Good news!
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 5:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] losing session token when using
ServletRedirectResult
hmm, looks like I was testing this thing out
The BeanTag, URLTag, and ActionTag are all present in WW2 and have been
for a while...
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Eriksson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 5:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Velocity support for non-ui tags?
-Original Message-
From: Michal Mosiewicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So this actually mean that it's assumed that there is a
single invoke per instance, right?
I was thinking if it's possible to that interceptor decides
to invoke a single action invocation chain multiple times
Title: Message
You're
correct, but there's more. The included files need to be the complete same
format as the main xwork.xml file with the DTD declaration and xwork
element as the root element. It needs to have this
structure:
!DOCTYPE xwork PUBLIC "-//OpenSymphony
Group//XWork 1.0//EN"
/views/test.vm/result
interceptor-ref name=defaultStack/
/action
/package
/xwork
I have both my xwork.xml and testAction.xml files in the root of my
classpath.
Jason Carreira wrote:
You're correct, but there's more. The included files
Exactly, although I'm not sure what power it would show, since it
wouldn't do anything itself, just let you get started faster :-)
-Original Message-
From: Matthew E. Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
be able to start
bringing together some existing infrastructure code from some interested
parties soon.
Thanks, and sorry for the confusion / delay,
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Jason Carreira
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:41 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
'[EMAIL PROTECTED
to someone who is used to JSP includes.
BTW, thanks for the great framework :)
- Original Message -
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:17 AM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] example using xwork's include tag
They need
Please log a bug report on jira.opensymphony.com and I'll take a look
-Original Message-
From: Jim Krygowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] beta1 example app -
If you have the Car object as a property of the Action, you can use the
VisitorFieldValidator (there's a little doc on this on the Wiki) to make
the validation framework use the validations defined for the Car class.
This way, you could define your common validations for the car in a
single
Oh, and I'm still open to making it possible to centralize validations
without having to inherit them... Maybe an include element in the
validation files like we have in xwork.xml? Then you could manage
validations all in your XML files without needing a second place to look
for what might have
package as the CarAction, what am I doing wrong here?
Jason Carreira wrote:
If you have the Car object as a property of the Action, you can use
the VisitorFieldValidator (there's a little doc on this on
the Wiki)
to make the validation framework use the validations
defined
When you say it doesn't work, what do you mean?
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] using one validator on several
different actions
I tried using
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] using one validator on several
different actions
im not getting any fieldErrors added the fields that were left blank
Jason Carreira wrote:
When you say it doesn't work
its not adding any fieldErrors at all
Jason Carreira wrote:
Keep in mind that these errors will be added as the property names
(i.e. name not car.name) so it might not show up next to the
field... See if it's got any errors when it runs. I'll
create a Jira,
as I just realized
Title: Message
That
sounds useful.. also, I don't know if you pick up the default parameter name for
each of the result types... this is a static constant field in each result class
(optional) which lets the framework know what name it should give unnamed
params.
i.e.
result
I'm not sure why it would fail there... The setLocation() method is
public on a public class... Did it give you any access exceptions the
first time?
-Original Message-
From: Bernard Choi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in
com.opensymphony.xwork.DefaultActionInvocation:127 .
OgnlUtil.setProperties(resultConfig.getParams(), result,
ActionContext.getContext().getContextMap());
I suspect that the location property might not be populated
in the initial context ?
- Original Message -
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED
We should add these into WW2... Please create a Jira issue...
-Original Message-
From: John Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 8:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Loop to create days
I am using ww2 so there is no
Title: Message
Yes...
If it's in there it will be added... I'll make it my next priority (after what
I'm working on now)
-Original Message-From: John Patterson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September
11, 2003 12:41 PMTo: WebworkSubject: [OS-webwork]
Include
Title: Message
Yep,
that sounds like a good one, especially if you're abstracting your user
management and security away from being J2EE specific...
-Original Message-From: Thompson, Kris
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11,
2003 4:36 PMTo:
[EMAIL
Title: Message
You
can look at the example war file that comes with WebWork2...
-Original Message-From: Chris Widhelm
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003
12:10 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [OS-webwork] So
many problems
I am attempting to
.
(Don't assume anything).
So you can not assume that your params are reset.
Cheers,
Scott
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 08:44:21PM -0500, Jason Carreira wrote:
The decision point for whether a tag instance can be reused
is if the
values for the optional attribute set are the same (same
set
can do to help?
Joe O, how's your investigation of WebWork2 and ensuing docs going?
Anything we can do to help?
Kris, how's the wafer implementation going? Need any help with it?
Thanks everyone!
Jason
--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone: 585.240.2793
fax: 585.272.8118
Title: Message
Did
you apply the ParameterInterceptor to the Action? This is what sets the
parameters into the Action.
-Original Message-From: Chris Widhelm
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003
10:59 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [OS-webwork]
henticated, are you talking about authorization, aka
roles?
Kris
Thompson
www.frameworks-boulder.org
-Original Message-From: Jason Carreira
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, September 15,
2003 9:02 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[OS-webw
onentStack"
interceptor-ref name="component"/
interceptor-ref name="defaultStack"/
interceptor-ref name="params"/
/interceptor-stack
/interceptors
This doesn't seem to work.
*shrug*
The interceptor documentation that I have
"details"/
page:applyDecorator name="admin"table width="100%"
cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" border="0" class="STEP" form
action="" method="get"
ww:textfield label="First Name" name=&quo
lic void setUser(Person
person) { user = person; }
}===
- Original Message -
From:
Jason Carreira
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 11:27
AM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Request
parameters not being set
Do
Matt Dowell, a coworker of mine, wrote up a quickstart guide:
http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/WebWork2+QuickStart+Guide
-Original Message-
From: Jason Carreira
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 11:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Documentation
I updated
No. We decided to make this an either you use the default or not thing
because Interceptors are a list and additive, unlike results, which are
a map and you can just override defaults. So if you define any
interceptors for the action, the default interceptors are not applied.
-Original
Your view will be based on the return value of the execute() method of
your Action. If you're extending ActionSupport, this is delegated to
doExecute() and wrapped with some logic (to call validate() which
calls doValidate() on your subclass, if you override it). If you return
Action.INPUT from
Title: Message
Make
your Action ParameterAware to get all of the params
-Original Message-From: Chris Widhelm
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003
12:49 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [OS-webwork]
Dynamic field generation
I have created a
generation
That's what I thought. I just noticed it was
deprecated so I wanted to make sure.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From:
Jason Carreira
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 11:54
AM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Dynamic field
Do a clean build... BaseActionSupport is no more...
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 1:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Build from CVS
I got the Xwork project from CVS (java.net) and tried to
Title: Message
When
you say it's in Tomcat's WEB-INF/classes, is this for your webapp, or some
Tomcat directory outside your webapp?
-Original Message-From: Peter White
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 6:18
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
It's assumed to be used as part of an application... That said, a
command-line dispatcher would be pretty cool.
-Original Message-
From: James Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 10:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Xwork Entry Point
It would have to be passed in the session... A redirect is a new
request...
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 11:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] preserving error messages when using
redirect
Title: Message
What's
the path to your Tomcat? Does it have a space in it?
Is
your xwork.xml all lowercase, or is it Xwork.xml?
grasping at straws
-Original Message-From: Peter White
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003
12:18 AMTo:
[EMAIL
If you're using domain objects or persisting the data, I would suggest
you use Object properties. Say, for instance, that you have an Invoice
domain object. You might have an CreateInvoiceAction Action class:
Public class CreateInvoiceAction extends ActionSupport {
private Invoice invoice =
You can create your own ActionFactory and specify your class in the
webwork.properties
-Original Message-
From: Darryl Pentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 6:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] WW1's DefaultActionFactory
It's a pity
The change was that I turned on XML validation.
The order is constrained, but doesn't necessarily have to be, if people
think it shouldn't be... I've made some of the sub-elements not choosy
about the order of their sub-elements because it was a pain
Jason
-Original Message-
From:
Please log a Jira issue for this... That should not stop processing
altogether...
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 7:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] preventing ognl exceptions?
i've got
The fact that it's not a class built specifically for backing this
form... Struts requires you to build form beans which extend an abstract
base class. Here you're just using your same domain objects directly,
without a mapping layer.
-Original Message-
From: Anoop Ranganath
each of
these operations.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Carreira
This is not how Freeroller was doing things. The problem
Roller was having was that they were porting from a DAO
model and every time they wanted to look up anything from
the database or store anything
:-)
A little. I'll look again. Did you send to Mike, too? He's got some code
to do the same things...
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Matthew E. Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork]
I've added the DTD to the Wiki... I think they need to remain
constrained for the reason you mentioned... We only want one block of
Interceptor declarations, etc...
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Eriksson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 10:36 AM
To:
+1 to that... The code from the book looked good... You guys interested
in contributing it (or at least the infrastructure bits)?
-Original Message-
From: Matthew E. Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Order of elements in xwork.xml
Great!
But for those who don't read or understand the DTD the correct order
should be mentioned in the docs.
/Jonas
Jason Carreira wrote:
I've added the DTD to the Wiki... I think they need to remain
constrained for the reason
Why would you want to try to keep a transaction open across multiple
requests? Multiple database connections can be handled by a JTA
transaction manager (XA 2PC)... Multiple VMs would probably also work
with JTA, but why would you want/need this?
-Original Message-
From: James Cook
/webwork2 best practices
FYI: I believe this is how the Spring Framework got started.
Cheers,
matthew
On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 10:31 AM, Jason Carreira wrote:
+1 to that... The code from the book looked good... You guys
+interested
in contributing it (or at least
-Original Message-
From: Matthew E. Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 2:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] hibernate/webwork2 best practices
I have looked at Spring and even had a chance to write some
code using
it.
*donning flameproof suit*
Because Jboss sucks?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Douglass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 2:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Fwd: [Hibernate] JBoss welcomes
Gavin and Hibernate
I don't know how
Title: Message
You
haven't defined the result type here... I'm checking in a change which will
throw a nicer more descriptive error.
You
need to either specify the result types or include a file which does (such as
webwork-default.xml).
See:
: [Hibernate] JBoss welcomes
Gavin and Hibernate
Oh. Didn't know. Hope you've got a good flameproof suit :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jason Carreira
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 7:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
Title: Message
Try it
with the webwork-default.xml too... make sure your package is extending
webwork-default so it picks up those settings...
-Original Message-From: Peter White
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 3:32
PMTo: [EMAIL
Title: Message
Carlos? You trying to send us a message?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:02 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [OS-webwork] (no
subject)
params from
affecting anything.
Cameron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
Jason Carreira
Sent: Wednesday, 17 September 2003 10:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] formbean vs. action
Were you seeing it going through and reprocessing the page?
Are you using Mozilla or IE? I noticed with my Mozilla that it kept
doing a GET when I hit the back button to go back to the form after
posting it... I'm not sure why... I'm relatively certain it's not
supposed to do that. I resorted to
is this
a bug? or mozilla just not playing the way it supposed to?
Jason Carreira wrote:
Were you seeing it going through and reprocessing the page?
Are you using Mozilla or IE? I noticed with my Mozilla that it kept
doing a GET when I hit the back button to go back to the form after
Sounds like a good one... Especially since you could use the same Action
with different validations to block some params in some situations and
other parameters in others...
-Original Message-
From: Tracy Snell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 9:49 AM
To:
This changed when I pulled out the workflow from ActionSupport into the
DefaultWorkflowInterceptor... You should either implement execute() or set your method
in your xwork.xml to be doExecute() or whatever other method you want to call.
Sorry for the trouble, but it's for the greater good :-)
=...
result.../
interceptor-ref name=defaultStack/
interceptor-param ref=params
name=disallowedinvoice.balance/interceptor-param
/action
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Carreira
Sent: Friday, 19
() changed too ?
- Original Message -
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 12:34 AM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Action not beeing executed
This changed when I pulled out the workflow from
ActionSupport
, 2003, at 14:23 Europe/Amsterdam, Jason Carreira
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matt Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 4:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-web
You should be able to push the value that you're looking
for onto
Try out Sitemesh... It does this kind of thing seamlessly without having
to put the includes in your page...
-Original Message-
From: Anoop Ranganath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] velocity, layouts,
I believe the change Matt made to the TokenInterceptor to make the
validToken() method return what the Javadoc said it should will make
this possible (this is in CVS HEAD). I think :-)
I still need to go in and fix the TokenInterceptorTest to pass (bad Matt
;-)) so don't hold me to anything I've
that are on a particular
stack, using the below technique ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Carreira
Sent: Friday, 19 September 2003 2:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] formbean vs. action
That's true
: Re: [OS-webwork] formbean vs. action
- Wiadomosc oryginalna -
Od: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wyslano: 18 wrzesnia 03 18:37
Temat: RE: [OS-webwork] formbean vs. action
That's true, but you could check the param map and see if there's
anything
501 - 600 of 1120 matches
Mail list logo
