On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:18 AM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect that it as far as industrial design students go, it could be a
toaster and it would get attention because of who designed it.
My, never has a Pentax generated such varied reactions.
Funny you should
Mark!
2012/2/3 Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com:
Look, Stan, if you're just going to be reasonable I'm going to have to
go over to the Pentax Forums for entertainment.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
On 2/2/2012 8:27 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow, I'd forgotten how ugly some cars were in the seventies. The Nova really
hasn't stood the test of time, has it?
That particular Nova hasn't anyway.
And to think I used to think it a good looking car. What was I thinking?
Nice pic.
BH has it for pre-order. Good product images and specs for those interested.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Underpaid N. Overpentaxed
overpenta...@googlemail.com wrote:
Mark!
2012/2/3 Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com:
Look, Stan, if you're just going to be reasonable I'm going to have to
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:06 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
If i set my camera for long exposure, say 30 with the 12 timer on,
and set multi exposure to 2 or 3 will the camera stay in multi until
all 3 shots are taken or will it
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:05 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:15 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
wrote:
From: Bill Owens
http://www.hlntv.com/video/2012/01/30/sexual-chocolate-beer?hpt=hp_bn13
Bill
I am so happy to see
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the main issue for most is that we were hoping for something
perceptibly above a K-5, i.e., a new flagship, or barring that, a
mirror-less body that still had some significant compelling features
above a K-5. That does not
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com wrote:
My, never has a Pentax generated such varied reactions.
In my books, this is a good thing. We can only hope that at least some
of the reaction and talk is happening in the general population.
K-01 specifics aside, Pentax
On 03/02/2012 2:40 AM, Bong Manayon wrote:
So the design people are excited about it, maybe they are the intended
market--not us, in the same way the multi-colored K-x/K-r opened the
Hello Kitty crowd to DSLRs.
The Kx/Kr were designed by camera designers, no amount of marketing hype
could
William Robb wrote:
On 03/02/2012 2:40 AM, Bong Manayon wrote:
So the design people are excited about it, maybe they are the intended
market--not us, in the same way the multi-colored K-x/K-r opened the
Hello Kitty crowd to DSLRs.
The Kx/Kr were designed by camera designers, no amount of
On Feb 3, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
William Robb wrote:
On 03/02/2012 2:40 AM, Bong Manayon wrote:
So the design people are excited about it, maybe they are the intended
market--not us, in the same way the multi-colored K-x/K-r opened the
Hello Kitty crowd to DSLRs.
The
That may be true. However even cameras not aimed at us should be an
interesting option. Hell most pros from the film era didn't use a one
of the professional 35mm cameras, and even the lowliest member of a
systems line could be used as a second body. I don't see this being a
viable backup to a
John,
I like the overall image best; there is a lot that is interesting in it (the
architectural context, for one thing) that is lost in the smaller pix. A lot
of image quality also goes overboard in the smaller ones.
I much =dislike= the forced flash slideshow.
Rick
On 03/02/2012 8:45 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
There's no *need* to change that: It's perfect for the market segment
the K-01 is targeted at (which ain't us).
Sadly though, take the cutesy signature off the bottom plate and you are
left with a mirrorless camera that mounts nothing but K-mount
Pentax sold a bunch of Kx's in Japan by making them in wild colors and
blister packs. Oly made a bunch of money with their retro designs and
admitted that the new e-PM1 was aimed at women who wanted a
fashionable camera. Given the that ultimate goal of Ricoh-Pentax is
to make money not cameras,
William Robb wrote:
On 03/02/2012 8:45 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
There's no *need* to change that: It's perfect for the market segment
the K-01 is targeted at (which ain't us).
Sadly though, take the cutesy signature off the bottom plate and you are
left with a mirrorless camera that mounts
On 03/02/2012 9:44 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Pentax may have made a really good choice here. Or maybe not - time
will tell. But they probably didn't have the financial resources to do
anything else.
Yeah, a viewfinder was beyond them. Really, that's all this thing is
missing.
That and
William Robb wrote:
On 03/02/2012 9:44 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Pentax may have made a really good choice here. Or maybe not - time
will tell. But they probably didn't have the financial resources to do
anything else.
Yeah, a viewfinder was beyond them. Really, that's all this thing is
on 2012-02-03 07:45 Mark Roberts wrote
There's no *need* to change that: It's perfect for the market segment
the K-01 is targeted at (which ain't us).
i dream of a world with lots of design and no target markets
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15103972
This should have been a multi exposure shot, but i failed to move the
curser up to the 'start shooting' command so all i did was get a bunch
of single shots. I did shoot DNG/Jpeg but my PSCS dies not recognize
the DNG file so i just used layers and
On 03/02/2012 10:12 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I'm not in the target demographic but it'll be interesting to see if
they like the looks of it. (I could be really cynical here and suggest
that simply having a designer associated with the product is as
important to these prospective buyers as
on 2012-02-03 08:44 Mark Roberts wrote
I don't think that's important to the target audience for the K-01,
which is basically young iPhone owners
i think the goofytronic design is more aimed at the android owners
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Almost bought one of those, glad i didn't
Dave
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:05 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Enough about the K-01, though there is something in common here
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20classic.html
Equipment:: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax
steve harley wrote:
on 2012-02-03 07:45 Mark Roberts wrote
There's no *need* to change that: It's perfect for the market segment
the K-01 is targeted at (which ain't us).
i dream of a world with lots of design and no target markets
Yep. That's a dream all right.
;-)
--
Mark Roberts -
on 2012-02-03 01:40 Bong Manayon wrote
Funny you should mention a toaster, I happen to need one. And yeah, a
toaster is a toaster is a toaster--so long they work there is nothing
really that compels me to any particular brand or model but as long it
is not ridiculously priced because it
Been thinking more about this, and the long long telephoto doesn't
make a huge amount of sense to me on an APS-C camera. A 550mm lens?
That would be a 775mm (35mm equiv) on a crop camera. Anybody see a
huge demand for that? Now a 550mm or 600mm lens on a full frame, would
be much more likely to be
An interesting abstract look. Not sure about the framing. Perhaps cropping some
off the top would be a plus.
Paul
On Feb 3, 2012, at 12:05 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15103972
This should have been a multi exposure shot, but i failed to move the
curser
On Feb 3, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Been thinking more about this, and the long long telephoto doesn't
make a huge amount of sense to me on an APS-C camera. A 550mm lens?
That would be a 775mm (35mm equiv) on a crop camera. Anybody see a
huge demand for that?
I want one for my
I'd secretly (my wife is listening) like to see a 400mm f/4 or 4.5 and a
quality 1.4 T/C.
Jack ;-)
From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, February 3, 2012 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: Lens road map
On
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
An interesting abstract look. Not sure about the framing. Perhaps cropping
some off the top would be a plus.
Paul
Yes framing in the dark.:-) Probably should use the 16-45 and get a
wider view for better crops.
Rick Womer wrote:
I have this nifty new receiver, which sounds great--a huge improvement
over my 38-year-old Pioneer.
What puzzles me is the volume control: Minimum volume is -90dB (mute),
and maximum is +15dB.
Huh?
What is zero dB? Is it an arbitrary point? Is it linked to some
On Feb 3, 2012, at 9:55 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
What is zero dB? Is it an arbitrary point? Is it linked to some
undisclosed property of the unit?
Typically, 0 dB represents 1 mW (milliWatt).
The formula for power is L_dB= 10 log_10 * (P1 / P0), where P0=1 mW
So, -90 dB - +15 dB
From s...@trantor.komkon.org Fri Feb 3 12:55:53 2012
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 12:55:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org
To: PDML@pdml.net
Subject: OT question for electronics geeks
Rick Womer wrote:
I have this nifty new receiver, which sounds great--a huge improvement
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:38 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 2/2/12, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I just watched a small portion of an interview of the designer of the
K-01. He mentioned very early on that he had never designed a camera
before. At that point, I decided that my initial
The 0dB marking is just an arbitrary reference on the unit and volume is
marked in dB instead of numbers like 0 thru 10. jco
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Igor Roshchin
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 12:56 PM
To: PDML@pdml.net
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I just don't see the point of the K-01. I mean, how the hell are you
supposed to use it with anything longer than (say) 150mm lenses? With a
DSLR you brace the camera against your hand/head with the other had
holding the
On 03/02/2012 12:06 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
This is a camera designed for people who are used to taking photos with cell
phones.
With the DA40, it should be fine. Anything much longer than that,
you'll need to
use a monopod or a tripod.
And they aren't going to like it because it
0 db is not an output. It is the amount of attenuation (resistance)
that the volume knob puts in the electron path. It is equivalent to
full volume and means nothing else -- it has no reference to what
that maximum output might be.
Therefore ...
The more powerful the amplifier the greater the
Bill,
I think you've found the magic bullet for Pentax Marketing!
A Pentax camera that's also a phone and that runs Apps on it's LCD.
'There's nothing like playing Angry Birds on my Pentax,
and you can make calls and take pictures too!'
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:05 PM, William
on 2012-02-03 12:10 Collin Brendemuehl wrote
0 db is not an output. It is the amount of attenuation (resistance)
that the volume knob puts in the electron path. It is equivalent to
full volume and means nothing else -- it has no reference to what
that maximum output might be.
sounds great
on 2012-02-03 12:10 Collin Brendemuehl wrote
0 db is not an output. It is the amount of attenuation (resistance)
that the volume knob puts in the electron path. It is equivalent to
full volume and means nothing else -- it has no reference to what
that maximum output might be.
.
sounds great
On 2/3/2012 10:57 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Larry Colenl...@red4est.com wrote:
I just don't see the point of the K-01. I mean, how the hell are you
supposed to use it with anything longer than (say) 150mm lenses? With a
DSLR you brace the camera against
Have you ever tried to use the LCD in full sunlight, its about useless. I
know you can buy a hood but why - something else to loose.
As nice as this camera may be for some it definitely holds no advantages for
me.
Obviously aimed at a different group of users than most of the people on
this
I think it's OK to be the cynic here. They put the designer's signature
on the product. When was the last time a camera manufacturer did that?
--
William Robb
To have any real significance (as opposed to importance) one must
recognize the name of the designer. If it had said Bertone or
And they aren't going to like it because it doesn't make phone calls,
play MP3's or have all sorts of cool apps.
--
William Robb
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
This is a camera designed for people who are used to taking photos with cell
phones.
That statement says more about your bias, Larry, than it does about
the camera or its intended audience.
I don't understand that statement, Godfrey. I think Larry's exactly
right and
This discussion is very interesting.
My guess is the numbers don't really correspond to any particular
value. The designer probably thought the fairly technical numbers
gave the front panel a feeling of technicality.
Kind of like deciding to make the volume knob go from 1-11 rather than
1-10.
On 2/3/2012 3:04 PM, Tom C wrote:
I think it's OK to be the cynic here. They put the designer's signature
on the product. When was the last time a camera manufacturer did that?
--
William Robb
To have any real significance (as opposed to importance) one must
recognize the name of the
George Sinos wrote:
This discussion is very interesting.
My guess is the numbers don't really correspond to any particular
value. The designer probably thought the fairly technical numbers
gave the front panel a feeling of technicality.
This has to be the case: Unless your input is a fixed
I use the LCD in all kinds of light. Sometimes it's a little difficult
to see ... In some types of lighting situations so is an eye-level
finder, and the LCD is easier. It's a heck of a lot easier to see an
LCD, particularly an articulated LCD, when I have the camera on a
short stand a few inches
On Feb 3, 2012, at 2:45 AM, John Coyle wrote:
The link is to a small gallery (4 shots) taken in Bologna, last year. The
first image is
good enough as a shot of a bunch of university students on a big (graduation)
day for
them, but on processing the image I thought there might be three
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
This is a camera designed for people who are used to taking photos with
cell phones.
That statement says more about your bias, Larry, than it does about
the camera or its intended
Stan,
Adroit critique. You missed the flash player :-(
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 2:45 AM, John Coyle wrote:
The link is to a small gallery (4 shots) taken in Bologna, last year. The
first image is
Nice design!
Though, I would have preferred a slightly different color scheme ;)
Bulent
-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
Very OT... probably sharing just as an outlet.
Micron (where I consult and have worked off/on for 4 years of the past
11) CEO Steve Appleton died today in the crash of his experimental
plane at the Boise airport around 9:00 AM.
I didn't know him personally, but he's a prominent figure in this
On 2/2/2012 1:05 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Enough about the K-01, though there is something in common here
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20classic.html
Equipment:: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax FA 20-35mm f4.0
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
Two words:
on 2012-02-03 13:35 George Sinos wrote
This discussion is very interesting.
My guess is the numbers don't really correspond to any particular
value. The designer probably thought the fairly technical numbers
gave the front panel a feeling of technicality.
my Yamaha RX-1100 (same brand as
steve harley wrote:
on 2012-02-03 13:35 George Sinos wrote
This discussion is very interesting.
My guess is the numbers don't really correspond to any particular
value. The designer probably thought the fairly technical numbers
gave the front panel a feeling of technicality.
my Yamaha
on 2012-02-03 12:38 Larry Colen wrote
Are the ergonomics not a lot closer to those of a cell phone camera, or a low
end point and shoot?
to me, it doesn't seem that they are; the controls are a little unsubtle, and
we fear they'll lack a refined feel, but the configurable buttons and the
That's pretty cool, Dave!
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Sent: February 3, 2012 2/3/12
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net, Petch Dianne
On Feb 3, 2012, at 15:12, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I have never owned a cell phone camera (although I'll buy an iPhone 4S
sometime later this year, because it has a good camera and that nice,
big, sharp LCD to focus and frame with...).
Great camera, but I still feel like I'm just millimeters
What Miserere said. Also, there was a quantitative study published on
the Web somewhere in 2010, after which I set the LightRoom export
quality slider to 75 and have left it there. -T
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 February 2012 02:37, Larry Colen
What a shame. Especially tough, since it seems this wasn't his first
crash. My husband flies small planes... owns an experimental one,
too... I hate hearing news like this, even though I know all the
lines about flying being safer than driving, etc. I wonder what went
wrong...?
-c
On Fri,
It's all bull do-do isn't it?
As George said earlier, it's to make it look more technical; I'm sure the
numbers on the faceplate bear little relation to any real output, ratios,
volts, watts, or anything else.
My Creek CAS 4040 has no numbers. Ya turns the volume knob clockwise and the
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
It's all bull do-do isn't it?
Well yes, that's the short version. :)
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
My Creek CAS 4040 has no numbers. Ya turns the volume knob clockwise and the
volume goes up. When it reaches an acceptable level ya stops turning. Too
loud? Ya turns the knob the other way.
By the way, that Creek 4040 is a *superb* integrated amp. Far better
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com:
William Robb wrote:
On 03/02/2012 2:40 AM, Bong Manayon wrote:
So the design people are excited about it, maybe they are the intended
market--not us, in the same way the multi-colored K-x/K-r opened the
Hello Kitty crowd to DSLRs.
The Kx/Kr
Quoting William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com:
On 03/02/2012 9:44 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Pentax may have made a really good choice here. Or maybe not - time
will tell. But they probably didn't have the financial resources to do
anything else.
Yeah, a viewfinder was beyond them.
I think I've had it for over 20 years now and it is a wonderful sounding amp.
Toroidal transformer, discrete components, mosfet power transistors, high
current capability. Most important, it sounds great.
And it has a very useful volume control. Seriously.
;-)
Cheers,
frank
What can be
Quoting P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
Enough about the K-01, though there is something in common here
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20classic.html
Equipment:: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax FA 20-35mm f4.0
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
Which reminds me of John Denver's last song;
You fill up my Cessna.
(Yeah, I know, it was a Long EZ)
On 2/3/2012 2:07 PM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
What a shame. Especially tough, since it seems this wasn't his first
crash. My husband flies small planes... owns an experimental one,
too... I
On 2/3/2012 2:07 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
It's all bull do-do isn't it?
As George said earlier, it's to make it look more technical; I'm sure the
numbers on the faceplate bear little relation to any real output, ratios, volts, watts,
or anything else.
My Creek CAS 4040 has no
[sighs heavily]
The NAD 3020 was one of the greats. My wife uses my old one
downstairs to drive some PSBs plugged into her computer. There's a
bit of a scratch in the volume control these days, but otherwise
perfect. -T
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Bull do-do is flattery. It can be useful fertilizer. The numbers, on the
other hand, are useless.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
From: knarftheria...@gmail.com knarftheria...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, February
on 2012-02-03 15:07 knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote
We don't need no stinking numbers.
i use the numbers so that i can put the control to a good spot before i
actually play the music; it's true, though, that i don't really care what they
mean; only venturing to guess what they mean because it
on 2012-02-03 14:49 Mark Roberts wrote
steve harley wrote:
so Yamaha apparently has a tradition of indicating volume in dB;
They aren't really indicating volume in dB, they are, as you noted,
showing the amount of *attenuation* between pre-amp and power amp in
dB. Very different thing.
hmmm
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 04:16:53PM -0700, steve harley wrote:
on 2012-02-03 14:49 Mark Roberts wrote
steve harley wrote:
so Yamaha apparently has a tradition of indicating volume in dB;
They aren't really indicating volume in dB, they are, as you noted,
showing the amount of *attenuation*
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
Thu Feb 2 11:45:31 EST 2012
Miserere wrote:
On 2 February 2012 10:35, Tim .sleby maritimtim at gmail.com wrote:
Don't know about the authentasy of this, (I'm at work and can't check
it out)
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 15:12, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I have never owned a cell phone camera (although I'll buy an iPhone 4S
sometime later this year, because it has a good camera and that nice,
big, sharp LCD to focus and
JC OCONNELL hifis...@gate.net wrote:
Typically, 0 dB represents 1 mW (milliWatt).
This is only the case with dBm where 0 dBm is indeed 1 mW across 600
Ohm, corresponding to a voltage of 0.775 V.
dB with nothing behind expresses any kind of logarithmic ratio.
Amplification, attenuation,
Thanks Rick: my thought was that the individual images had more dynamism than
the larger
one, with people moving L-R in the first two.
I used PS Elements 9 to create the gallery, and the slideshow seems to be the
default: you
can, however, click on the numbers at the bottom right to view any one
Thanks Stan. I was really intending only to take a general scene, and with the
16-45 it
would have been difficult to take closer shots without intruding on the action
too much.
Finding the three contained images seemed to be a bonus!
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original
Bob, I've never quite understood the objections to Flash on web sites - surely
it's just
another tool?
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bob
Sullivan
Sent: Saturday, 4 February 2012 7:15 AM
To:
John Francis wrote:
I'm pretty sure the meters on my tape decks, etc. all had a 0
setting around 3/4 of the way along. On the old mechanical ones
the area behind the needle past that point was painted red; on the
later electronic ones that was where the colour of the indicator
lights changed
Hey there, Dont misquote me, I didnt state that, someone else did.
Seriously, jco
PS. I stated the 0dB marking was just arbitrary and the rest
Of the dial was marked in dB for reference only to the
Arbitrary 0dB marking. In reality an amplifer has a voltage
Gain in dB at specific settings of the
I think I got my Creek in the mid to late 80s.
I had considered the NAD and Rotel but for various reasons ended up with the
Creek, a decision I never regretted.
It's currently fed by a Technics cd player with a Kimber optical link from the
transport directly into an MSB d/a converter. It
Setting tape recording levels is a tradeoff between distortion and
noise.
VU meters are different from peak reading digital meters, it gets tricky
To find ideal recording levels but for home use with dolby I always
liked
To use good tape and err on the side of recording too low rather than
It's a really nice series, John. I can almost feel the vibrancy and life in the
square.
Great stuff!
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: John Coyle jco...@iinet.net.au
Sent: February 3, 2012
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/sets/72157629121933767/
My camera club has been doing something new since last year. We've
been working on portfolios. It's a tough challenge because some of my
favorite shots were winnowed out because they just didn't fit with the
theme, in my case
On 2/3/2012 4:23 PM, John Coyle wrote:
Bob, I've never quite understood the objections to Flash on web sites - surely
it's just
another tool?
It's another tool that uses up bandwidth, doesn't work on a wide variety
of browsers, and will often make you wait a long period before being
able
Thanks Frank.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
knarftheria...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, 4 February 2012 10:51 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: GESO - Bologna, three in one
It's a
On 2/3/2012 4:55 PM, David Parsons wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/sets/72157629121933767/
My camera club has been doing something new since last year. We've
been working on portfolios. It's a tough challenge because some of my
favorite shots were winnowed out because they
Very interesting set of photos that won the contest The Best Of Russia
in 2008-2011:
http://live-imho.livejournal.com/160261.html
BabelFish translates most of the titles in a reasonable way, but
some of the translations are just off the wall, and make
the photos rather funny.
All portraits are of a very high standard.
Very well done!
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com
Sent: February 3, 2012 2/3/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Wow!
Some amazing and compelling photos there.
Thanks for the link.
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org
Sent: February 3, 2012 2/3/12
To: PDML@pdml.net
Subject:
on 2012-02-03 17:06 Ralf R. Radermacher wrote
Faders in studio equipment, e.g. mixing consoles, are usually labelled
from minus infinity through 0 dB (the normal open position) to +15 dB.
I suppose the manufacturer of the amplifier has put these dB values
around the volume knob to make it look
I think the individual images are just fine, it is just that they are all very
different. A portfolio needs to feel cohesive, and there is more to it than
just the subject matter. Your portfolio has colour and monochrome, verticals
and horizontals, square and rectangular crops, closeups and
On my way to work today, in much different light. Two crops:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15106593
and
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15106592
(K-7, DA 16-45)
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On 2012-02-03 12:28, Larry Colen wrote:
Nope, most people these days seem to hold their camera from both edges of the
body, elbows out to either side and flopping in the breeze, that is when they
aren't holding them at arm's length using live view.
Trying to hand hold pretty much anything
http://www.ebay.com/itm/200704816518?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
I listed it as BIN or best offer...
It's a good little flash, it just was hard for me to see what the
lefthand knob of istD where you change the ISO and WB etc.
also,
a K1000 for parts - $10
and if any
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
