Marnie -
Yeah - it's easy to recommend an expensive solution. But the key is
to have at least two copies. If the two copies can be different types
of media all the better.
In it's simplest form, it can be a working copy on your hard drive
with one or two sets of DVD's as backup. One can be
Only slightly off topic. I saw a firewire/USB comparison on the
television show Call for Help.
The results were interesting. I don't remember the exact details, but
they used firewire and USB to transfer about 10 Gbytes of data. They
did the test on an apple and on a dell.
Here are the
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...clip...
However, the histogram (and apparently the blinkies
as well) in the *ist cameras describe the jpeg image. When shooting
RAW, some highlights that might shown as off the scale can actually be
accommodated. ...clip...
I agree with Paul, and
Hey look -
When you hold a Pentax up to the mirror it looks like Nikon
On 12/27/05, Albano Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.flaneur.albanogarcia.com.ar/2005/12/27/operado/ I'll be out of
business for about 3 to 4 weeks. I got a simple surgery on my hand due to a
Responding to the conversation on family photos -
I'm in the middle of a similar family project.
I thought the scanning would be tedious. Other than time consuming,
it's not that bad. The part I don't enjoy is taking the photos out of
the various album pages that the family has used over the
My guess it will be a huge hit at the big box electronics stores like
Best Buy and CompUSA.
gs
On 12/21/05, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if it will be sold without the lens.
Given the fierce competition in the DSLR field, who does Samsung think
will be the market for
Not really, this is a new book devoted to Digital Asset Management
from the viewpoint of the photographer.
http://thedambook.com/
I picked it up yesterday at the local Barnes and Noble and have been
using it as an excuse to not finish those Christmas Cards.
Chapter 1 is downloadable from the
Given the number of good ideas here, it's probably not a bad place to
mention photo organization software.
Google offers Picasa at www.picasa.com. This is free software and is
a good inexpensive way to see what this type of software can do to
help you out.
My current organizer is imatch
Ann - I use publisher quite a bit and have wondered about this myself.
If you get an answer let me know. Thanks, gs
On 11/13/05, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok I have MS word _ I used tables to make pages in
a engagement calendar format
but word doesnt let me put something to the
Short version -
The hard drive on which I store my photos crashed. I restored the
backup copy and didn't lose anything but time. At the same time I
discovered a hole in my backup process and plugged it.
Long version -
Late last Saturday afternoon I returned from a surprise party. The
family
Godfrey -
Just a couple of questions.
Do you disconnect the backup drives when you're not using them?
and
Do you take anything off site?
GS
On 10/31/05, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on the complexity
of digital point and shoots cameras and the less than useful,
extremely large manuals.
Graywolf
I've mentioned before that I teach a how to use your new digital
camera class at the local community college.
The requirements are to
Ann -
Have you used the free Open Office software suite? It's the free
alternative to some of Microsoft's office products. Among other
things the latest version included their take on Word.
What will make it helpful for your needs it can output your document
directly to PDF format.
You can
to the reasonable
price, it's pretty much a win-win situation.
And thanks to the link to the Koren site. Plenty there to while away the
idle hour!
John
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 00:44:30 +0100, George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John
Don't know about the manual, but had to toss my two cents
John
Don't know about the manual, but had to toss my two cents into the
conversation on Picture Window Pro.
I used Picture Window Pro at home and Photoshop at work up through
Photoshop version 7 and never felt the need to spend the money on
Photoshop for my hobby photography. In fact, I felt
Cotty wrote, requesting info on a digital camera primer.
Cotty -
I teach a couple of non-credit courses at the local community college.
The materials at this site http://www.shortcourses.com/ seem to work
very well for beginners.
In particular a short course in choosing a digital camera and a
Shel -
My Photo site is hosted at Smugmug. They offer an excellent product
for a reasonable price. Go to http://www.smugmug.com and click on
help.
The bottom line is for $29.95 per year you get unlimited storage
space. At that level I think you get 4 gigabytes/month of bandwidth.
It's hard
A few folks wondered about the lens, etc:
The car was at a dead stop, so I opened the window and held the
OptioMX steady on top of the side view mirror. The OptioMX has a
5.8mm-58mm zoom lens, f2.8-f3.5. The exif data says the exposure was
1/750 second at f/8, ISO 100, 7mm focal length.
I
We held belt sander races at last year's woodworkers picnic.
Here's a link:
http://georges.smugmug.com/gallery/170694/1
The belt sander shots are near the end of the gallery.
See you later, gs
http://www.georgesphotos.net
These photos were taken with the 3 megapixel version of the OptioMX.
I've had it for over a year and am still surprised by this odd little
camera.
It has a nice combination of size and features and is great for those
times when you don't want to carry anything very large.
Here are a few
Here's my morning drive.
http://Georges.smugmug.com/photos/37815932-M.jpg
Eastbound traffic goes straight into the morning Sun.
See you later, gs
http://www.georgesphotos.net
Don -
I'm one of those guys that went to autofocus because it's almost
impossible to focus quickly with my bifocals, so... take this question
with a grain of salt.
Because of the bifocals I fiddle with the diopter correction more than
I'd like. I always focus on something at the far end of the
Kostas - That certainly clarifies it. (Sorry about the pun.) gs
On 9/26/05, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, George Sinos wrote:
My guess is the correction has more to do with the distance from the
focusing screen to the eyepiece than anything else
Just adding my two cents on evaluating noise on the screen vs. prints.
I agree with Paul. I've noticed that my ink jet prints show much less
noise than I would have been led to believe was there by the screen
rendition. I don't know if this is a side effect of the printer's
conversion software
I convert my raw files to DNG, then make a set of reasonably sized jpegs.
Everything gets mirrored to another external hard drive. Once a month
all the new stuff goes to DVDs.
Storage is relatively cheap and getting cheaper. It's certainly
cheaper than processing the equivalent amount of film.
JCO -
I agree with you in concept. But, in the end, no matter how many
folks write to Pentax about their old lenses it's just not going to
make any difference.
I'm one of the guys with an old screw mount Spotmatic and a few
lenses. It served me well from 1968 through 2001 when I bought my 5n.
Replying in general to long URLs...
You can include a long URL as long as you surround it with these
long url in here
Most popular mail programs will correctly interrpret anything between
the 's as a single URL, even if it spans more than one line.
See you later, gs
There are a lot of differences between CS and CS2. Of these there are
a few I use often:
You can straighten and crop an image in Camera Raw, these changes are
non-destructive and are stored in the DNG file.
The major camera raw sliders all now have an auto setting. For most
of the stuff I
Shel -
I bought Elements 3 to get the updated version of Photoshop Album. I
don't use the Elements part of it much these days.
Here's a link to a screen shot of the single PE3 raw converter screen
and five shots showing the CS2 raw converter with each of it's five
tabs selected.
Hi Marnie -
I bought S40's for my kids last Christmas. (What a grandfather will do
to get pictures of the grandkids!)
The cameras work well and I am being supplied with lots of photos.
The camera is well suited to their needs. Lithium AA's last a long
time. Photos are relatively well exposed
Shel - Which raw converter are you using? gs
On 9/3/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, i did something like you suggested, and the final results were
better, although for the purpose of putting the images up I wanted to show
them with no adjustments. I was hoping you'd
Shel - have you tried formatting the card with your pc?
I'm willing to believe the Ds has a problem, but I'm more willing to
believe you have a bad card. That little switch on the SD cards it
pretty tiny. It's the thing I like least about SD cards.
See you later, gs
On 9/3/05, Shel
Shel -
I have to throw my vote in with the Lithium AAs. On the D, I'm
getting about 1000-1200 shots per set of four. A 4-pack is $9.99 at
target. The CR-V3's perform better but are as much as twice the
price.
I seldom use the built-in flash. When I feel the need for flash I use
an external
Just a couple of semi-related items:
Warren Buffet and Bill Gates recently ate a local restaurant when
Gates visited town.
I snapped these shots of the Restaurant's tongue-in-cheek marquee.
http://georges.smugmug.com/gallery/763341
Not great art, just a fun snapshot.
After you're checked out
Amita -
After taking a quick look at the two manuals on the Pentax website, I
think you have the relative functionality of both cameras nailed.
The two cameras are aimed at different audiences, but they both have
an adjustment for exposure compensation. That's a feature I wouldn't
want to be
Shel -
The answer to this is actually quite simple. A flash system is
approximately 1.5 times the price of a simple flash. It's also very
likely that it will have a couple of extra buttons that you'll never
remember how to use.
Guys from our generation probably referred to them as fancy flash
Frantisek asked for a clarification of the calculation
It's more of a tongue-in-cheek rationalization than a real calculation
(as I suspect of your analysis...)
I converted the total number of digital shots to the equivalent number
of 36 exposure rolls of film and multiplied by the current
After updating my records and checking my very scientific
calculations, I have discovered that I have passed the point where the
cost of my digital equipment is less than the cost of processing an
equivalent number of film frames.
I am now 42 cents (U.S.) ahead of the game. I think I'll go shoot
Just yesterday, Brooks Jensen's audio blog was a comment on film.
http://www.lenswork.com/lwb.htm
Click on the link, scroll down to the July 14th entry and pick the
appropriate link for your connection speed.
I don't always agree with Jensen, but he always makes me think a bit.
See you later,
Shel -
I have a 5n with the kit 28-80 AF zoom and a Tamron 70-300 AF zoom.
Most of the time both work fine. It can hunt in some low light
situations, but if you switch to spot focus so it only uses the
center AF sensor it reduces that behavior significantly.
A couple of situations where I've
Check the Barnes and Noble website. http://www.bn.com They list
the CS and CS2 version of both books.
Both titles are very good. If you're purchasing CS2 make sure you get
the CS2 version of the book. There is quite a bit of added function
in CS2. The replacement of the browser with the
I recently visited the Oklahoma City National Memorial with my two
sons. Here are are some photos and a couple of video clips.
http://georges.smugmug.com/gallery/618589
This is the memorial to those who were killed in the bombing of the
Murrah Federal Building in 1995.
Not knowing what to
Dario -
The shutter speed wheel is the closer of the two to the shutter button.
On 6/5/05, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3) I'd standardize the two aperture/shutter speed wheels in any mid- to
top-range camera. And , please, please, the aperture wheel must be on the
front
Russel Brown has updated his website with several demonstration videos
specifically on the CS2 Raw Converter and the Bridge.
They are pretty big downloads, but once you get them to your computer
you can play them with Quicktime.
The three most interesting were CS2 Bridge Workflow, CS2 Camera
Responding to the comments on CS2 -
I've been working with it this weekend. It's going to be a while
before I get a handle on just how much more powerful this program may
be.
There are a couple features in ACR that haven't been mentioned. One
is the crop tool, so you can crop before you do the
Marnie -
I notice you have an aol email address. I don't remember the
specifics, but AOL, by default, compresses graphics to speed up
response time. You can turn the compression off.
My guess is it only kicks in when you're using AOL's built in browser
and probably is ignored when you use an
I'm just curious, Alan. Why do you want to do that?
GS
On 5/14/05, Alan P. Hayes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a couple of SM lenses with the little push rod arrangement
for stopping the lens down. Is there a simple solution to keeping it
pushed in when using the lens with a screw to
Amita -
This is a great shot and your friend will love it just as it is.
It might be fun to experiment with the lens blur filter to try
blurring the background a bit. You might be able to throw some of the
distracting items out of focus.
See you later, gs
Over on the luminous-landscape http://luminous-landscape.com/ they
sell the Video Journal, a DVD magazine.
One of the segments on issue 11 that I found most interesting was an
interview with Ctein. He made a statement that every technological
advance in printing had brought improvements in some
--
George Sinos Papillion, NE
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://georgesoptions.net
Photos: http://georgesphotos.net
--
Hi Mike -
Here's one of the links, but I don't think it will do you any good.
It will just take you to the page you can already see.
Try the option that's in the fine print below the spot where the video
should be. It says:
If you'd like to save this movie, right click this link The
words
I thought that model number rang a bell. When I saw the photo I
recognized it immediately.
I had one of those for several years in the 80's. It was a great
snapshot camera for the family. If I remember correctly it was some
sort of hybrid mechanical/electronic exposure system. Compared to
Paul -
Thanks for the tip. I ordered an LL-60 a few days ago and it was
delivered today.
The 16-45 is a great lens, but at the wide end it's pretty easy to
tilt the camera and get some extreme perspective shifts. This screen
should help out a bit.
Thanks, gs
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:57:22
location.
The stills were taken with an istD and the videos were shot with an OptioMX.
http://georges.smugmug.com/gallery/443099
See you later, gs
--
George Sinos
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://georgesoptions.net
Photos: http://georgesphotos.net
--
It was impressive.
The videos are mpeg 1, so they should play on just about anything.
They are between 4 and 8 Mb each, so they can take a bit to download.
Worst case, right-click and save them to your pc, then play them
locally.
See you later, gs
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:25:35 +, Cotty
Replying to several -
First, thanks for the compliments. I had a lot of fun with this one.
On the videos - I changed the gallery format to one that may be a bit
more friendly to videos. In this format, Smugmug (the host for my
photo site) has a few hints under the videos. The best bet, if
Replying to several comments on color space -
Mark Roberts posted this link to Dry Creek's web site with an
interactive 3D model that let's you compare color spaces:
http://www.drycreekphoto.com/Learn/color_spaces.htm
Playing with the model a bit has pretty much convinced me that I'm not
losing
In response to several comments on color space.
Converting back and forth between color spaces isn't a good idea.
You'll degrade things a bit every time you convert. Perhaps an
oversimplification, but true.
All the more reason to shoot and store the raw images. You can
convert the raw to any
.
There are also predictions from execs of Olympus, Delkin, Konica-Minolta,
Canon, Kodak, and Sony.
See you later, gs
--
George Sinos
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://georgesoptions.net
Photos: http://georgesphotos.net
--
would have ordered a set of files on a CD.
I'm not sure which order is more profitable for the seller. Where does the
photo center make it's money these days? Is it sheer volume?
Just curious.
See you later, gs
--
George Sinos
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
predictability. These old
units are workhorses and are still being sold because they work so well.
See you later, gs
--
George Sinos
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://georgesoptions.net
Photos: http://georgesphotos.net
--
might be tempted, when on short trips, to just
carry two or three sets of the lithium batteries, and not carry the battery
charger. Is this consistent with what others have experienced?
See you later, gs
--
George Sinos
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web
that profile to
match your camera. Fraser describes the calibration method using an image
of a Macbeth color chart.
Once fine tuned, you can safe these profiles for each of your cameras.
Photoshop Elements 3.0 does not have this feature.
See you later, gs
--
George
author.
There are several other interesting white papers on the same page.
Here's the link to adobe white papers:
http://www.adobe.com/digitalimag/ps_pro_primers.html
See you later, gs
--
George Sinos Papillion, NE
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web
selection of these items. Their prices seem to be reasonable
and service is good.
Here's the link: http://thomas-distributing.com/
See you later, gs
--
George Sinos
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://georgesoptions.net
Photos: http
Processor 2.0.
Download the huge tutorial and watch it. Then download the free processor
and try it out.
See you later, gs
--
George Sinos
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://georgesoptions.net
Photos: http://georgesphotos.net
--
on each.
See you later, gs
--
George Sinos
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://georgesoptions.net
Photos: http://georgesphotos.net
--
Earlier Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked about Smugmug
Amita -
I've used Smugmug since May of 2003. You may recognize the link:
http://georgesphotos.net I've posted it before. It's mainly a site for
my family photos. I also use the site to post the photos from the monthly
meetings of our
Earlier Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Antonio wrote:
Not to mention the poor quality of those digital prints.
Here I must disagree. A properly printed digital print is equal in quality
to an average film print, up to 8x10 at least. Above 8x10 and for severe
crops I'll agree with you. Our
Earlier Dr. Shaun Canning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote of his
slide scanning situation.
Shaun -
I recently went through the same thing. I may have written here a few
weeks ago about scanning several hundred slides taken by my late father in
the late 50's and early 60's. My mother had found these
Earlier Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But that's what I'm trying to
avoid... maybe I don't get it. I can stomach doing adjustments to the
image as seen on the monitor, but once I get it 'right' on the monitor, I
want the print to be a 'best match'. Otherwise it's purely guesswork about
how
Earlier John Mustarde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So what did she buy for
an upgrade from the ME Super? Canon Rebel. Kit... Now, a couple of years
later, she has added the Digital Rebel as her primary camera, which came
with an 18-55 kit lens.
Since part of this thread talks about lens
Butch and all you other guys that run labs:
I've received some pretty dirty stuff back from the local discount place,
but never anything optically fuzzy. I've since moved my business to
another place.
Help me understand, since I've only developed black and white negs and
color slides at home.
Earlier Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote my *istD's shutter release
fires even when the memory card is full.
in response to my earlier statement that my *istD's shutter locks when the
card is full.
Herb, I took a quick glance at the manual to see if any of the custom
functions controlled
Earlier Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked if there was a compelling
argument that would sway his child's principle to teach photography using a
darkroom.
Kevin -
Regardless of our many opinions and experiences with in the darkroom, I
think you are wasting your time, and missing a chance
Several posts on the Holga peeked out from between all the weird messages
of the day.
It's probably only a coincidence that I was looking at this web site today:
http://www.lensbabies.com/
Somewhere on the site they say that a pentax mount will be available in the
next week or so.
I don't know
the
image stacker in Picture Window Pro?
See you later, gs
--
George Sinos Papillion, NE
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://georgesoptions.net
Photos: http://georgesphotos.net
--
I get a kick out of Reichman. I think he's a nice balance to the technical
review sites.
A few months ago I subscribed to the dvd's.
He has an assignment competition on each dvd where the prize is a free one
year subscription renewal.
On a whim, I submitted this photo for the assignment theme
A number of people have commented on 16 or 8 bits with respect to RAW file
conversion:
The current issue of Photo Techniques Magazine has an excellent article
written by Norman Koren on getting the most from a RAW file. While the
article is not available on line, here is a link to the
Several people posted confusing definitions of USB and USB Hi-speed. The
real story can be found here:
http://www.usb.org/info/usb_nomenclature
Extremely abbreviated version:
The USB Hi-Speed logo indicates the device ...supports the Hi-Speed USB
data transfer rate of 480 Mb/s...
The USB
Earlier Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only thing
about moving to the istd is that I'd probably want/need to upgrade
Photoshop to CS ...
Shel -
I don't have an alternative is you want to upgrade Photoshop CS, but I'm
pretty sure you don't need to make the upgrade.
My bargain
Earlier Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a few things about
various software
Shel
The PS Raw plug in is great, the only drawback is you need Photoshop CS,
and CS requires Windows XP or one of the later Mac versions. I can't
remember which. Good excuse to upgrade though.
Asset
Earlier Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked for pointers towards
sharpening methods that can be used with Picture Window Pro.
Bruce:
If you're using the latest version of Picture Window Pro you'll have the
Advanced Sharpen function on the Transformation menu.
Go to http://www.dl-c.com/ -
Earlier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote They have been around for a long time as a
vehicle to build retailer margins... Don't ever purchase them!
On the other hand, I bought my son a pretty good laptop computer just
before he left for college from a major mail-order computer maker with a
3 year
. Getting to work tomorrow should be interesting.
See you later, gs
--
George Sinos Papillion, NE
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://georgesoptions.net
Photos: http://georgesphotos.net
--
was more easily seen.
Not fine art, just snapshots for the curious.
As I write this it's snowing again. Another 8-12 inches is predicted over
today and tomorrow. Getting to work tomorrow should be interesting.
See you later, gs
--
George Sinos Papillion, NE
e
Earlier Rob Studdert asked which image management tools apart from
ThumbsPlus maintain a readily accessible thumbs library of off-line media
(is stored CDs etc), and which of these companies have announced that they
will support the Pentax native RAW format in the near future.
Rob -
I've
On the topic of a home for PUG
Perhaps www.smugmug.com should be given consideration as a home for
pug. There are several advantages.
Storage is unlimited at all subscription levels.
Bandwidth allowances are as follows:
2 gigabytes per month at the standard $29.95 per year level.
4 gigabytes
Earlier Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CS doesn't support PEF
format. they are rumored to be supporting in an update...
It's a bit stronger than a rumor. A representative of Adobe said it will
be in the next update to the Raw Converter. It's expected sometime in
early 2004. This is
Earlier Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The main purpose i use the preview
screen on my 10D for whilst shooting is to check for blown high lights
(they flash black and white).
and Robe Studdart wrote: It's not a loss of skill, it's a new set of tools.
And I think that's the evolution.
First we
Just replying to the thread in general.
There seems to be a bit of confusion on profiles, color spaces and color
management, in general. No surprise. The topic is complex and most of
what is written in the popular press doesn't help much.
Here are three resources that may help, the first two
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/essays/vanRiper/index.htm
Here's a link to this week's Washington Post Photography column by Frank
Van Ripper.
He's responding to another news story where Wedding photographers were
called one of the top ten overpaid professions.
See you later, gs
Earlier Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote that he had
downloaded PWPro 3.1.
Shel -
PWPro 3.5 added quite a few features. The advanced sharpening was a big
one. There were also a lot of improvements to the browser that let you
compose album pages. I think the sticky settings option was
Earlier Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked for comments on
Picture Window Pro vs. Photoshop 7.0
Shel - I've been using Photoshop and Picture Window Pro for a while
now. Both have their pros and cons, but I'm going to make my comments from
the viewpoint of a Photoshop user wondering about
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 22:00:00 + (GMT) Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am open to suggestions for something
better. If PC is your style, we could go disabled-mount. If you like the
lack of backwards compatibility, we can try calling them perfect-mount,
way of the future-mount
On: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:48:20 -0500, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In its present configuration its still a
snapshot camera., referring to the istD.
Paul -
I use my istD for snapshots, but it's a heck of a lot more than a snapshot
camera. I'm not sure what you meant by the above
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote that he didn't see the concern
about CF card slot or the AA batteries used in the istD.
Frankly, I think most of the negative comments that I've read are a
testament to the fact that there is not much to complain about on this camera.
The CF card tightness
At 10:40 PM 12/27/2003, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone said:
Everything is on the computer now. Can't imagine using the real darkroom
again. Other than e-bay or a garage sale, what are you guys going with
your old darkroom equipment?
No, everything is not on the computer
Graywolf asked related questions:
Related questions:
1. who on the list currently has a darkroom.
2. is it a permanent darkroom, or do you have to set it up each time you
use it?
3. do you do BW, or color, or both?
4. who besides TV has junked their darkroom for digital.
I can't believe I
Jerome asked about correcting white balance after the fact.
Jerome -
The easiest way is to shoot RAW format and correct it in conversion to your
desired format.
If it's too late for that, try the Color Balance transformation in Picture
Window Pro from Digital Light and Color.
I've worked
801 - 900 of 919 matches
Mail list logo
