David Savage wrote:
Morton Bay Bug, from Queensland.
Not necessarily!
It could have been a Balmain Bug:
http://www.sea-ex.com/fishphotos/bug,.htm
Depends whether Paul was in northern or southern Australia, at
the time he got his bug.
Keith McG
On 12/23/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Because I dont belive it, that's why.
Why wouldnt they care? Are they legally blind
or something? I have never
heard of anyone who didnt care whether
their TV picture sucks or is good in my
life. And that is what this is, good vs sucks
TV picture.
For me, the
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Keith McGuinness
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:30 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Please everyone set up an email filter
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Because I dont belive it, that's why.
Why wouldnt they care? Are they legally blind
or something
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Dave,
Maybe October (November?) could be Nature's Colors?
It would be interesting to contrast the two seasons from different
hemispheres.
Regards, Bob S.
On 12/17/06, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might you swap October and November? There aren't any
fall
Mark Cassino wrote:
I configured Thunderbird to send plain text to the
list, and the messages show up in the sent folder as
plain text, so I can't figure out what the problem is.
Is anyone here using Thunderbird to post to the PDML?
If so - any tips on settings?
I'm using Thunderbird BUT
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I vote roswell.
There's surely more solid information about than than about the K1D.
Finally, something I can agree with, without sounding stupid or
misinformed!
Keith McG
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Mat Maessen wrote:
On 11/6/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're talking about these controls in Camera Raw, the adjustments
are made on the entire image.
Thank you for that tidbit of information, Godfrey. This one's going in
the useful information file.
I agree!
What a
A truly excellent PUG (imo).
My personal favourites...
H Rust: River's End - Because I'm a sucker for sunsets; but very
nicely shot.
G Cain: Little Lost Bucket at the Beach - Kind of whimsical.
T Vigfussen: Abandoned half-built house - Very moody.
T Reese: Mesa Verde NP - Because those
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It's not an either/or proposition. I can shoot any way I please, and get
pleasure of varying degrees from whatever my choice is. Of course, you're
so blinded by what you perceive as being the one and only way of doing
things, you can't understand that.
Of course!
And
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Keith McGuinness
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 8:26 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It's not an either/or proposition. I can shoot any way I please,
and
get
pleasure of varying
I'm thinking of a kit with the 18-125 as a general use lens, FA50/f1.4
for portraits and low light and Sigma 105/f2.8 EX macro for close up and
quality longer shots. Any opinions?
Most pictures at the site below taken with the 18-125:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I'm rubber and you're glue
Whatever you say
Bounces off me
And sticks to you LOL
I think this is probably the most valuable thing I've learned
from this thread. 8-)
Keith McG
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
David Savage wrote:
You've got 3 days (4 in some places) to get your Juxtaposition entry in.
I have to admit I'm struggling with this one.
I'm struggling too, big time!
I hereby submit a disclaimer in advance and direct all blame for
the quality (or lack of) in my entry (assuming I have
Stunning.
Keith McG
David Mann wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently finished a long-overdue update to my gallery viewer.
On the surface not a lot has changed except a little prettifying, but
I've made some significant changes under-the-hood.
With all the work I've put into it I really
John Forbes wrote:
He should simply throw away the cable and DL using a card reader. Far
more reliable, and less hassle.
Not for me. I prefer using the cable to a card reader (which I
have also).
Keith McG
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Adam Maas wrote:
Keith McGuinness wrote:
Not for me. I prefer using the cable to a card reader (which I
have also).
Keith McG
A good card reader is significantly faster and doesn't drain your camera
batteries. Why use the cable?
The difference in transfer between 3 minutes and 1 minute
Mark Roberts wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
The high (and high quality) turnout does suggest that a simple theme can
be more inspirational than a quirky one designed to challenge the
photographer. This was a straightforward subject, but it didn't produce
banal images. Or perhaps it is
Tom C wrote:
I've long thought that the light yellow background was, how do I say it PC,
an unusual color choice. I know it wasn't chosen by Adelheid or even
yourself, but I do think we could consider a change. I think a gray
backgroud is more neutral and a may improve the overall look of
The August PUG is open. A bit late due to last minute adjustments.
Thanks Adelheid!
I looked at this gallery and had three quick thoughts: a lot of
really good photographs here; a LOT of photographs here; and, I
won't be commenting on ALL of them this time...at least my first
two thoughts
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Ken! that's fabulous - it is a lovely image - way to go!
I don't know anything about the prize you won, though -
Hope it is worthwhile
Sometimes you just have to say: Me
The first one is fun and I agree with the comment on the light
for the third.
Keith McG
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I just added these three to my single photo -misc gallery on
photo.net
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4740660
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4739367
Wow! Really like this one.
Keith McG
Jack Davis wrote:
Hope I've not put this up in the past.
Taken at a city park lake in Dec. several years back.
I first noticed the tree, parked and made my way toward it. The unseen
Canada geese launched themselves from the bank below as I blindly
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Jul 26, 2006, at 5:27 PM, Keith McGuinness wrote:
I don't feel that my academic freedom would be infringed in the
least if he got the boot.
Keith, you wouldn't feel that your academic freedom would be infringed
if a professor were booted without an examination
John Coyle wrote:
No Keith, it's in fact the top of the cliffs above the north bank of the
Brisbane River, literally across the road from my unit block!
It really is inner-city, so to see a snake of this size is quite something.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
Amazing. I know wildlife can
William Robb wrote:
I installed Lightroom on my machine, but for some reason, it won't run.
When I try to start it, the computer looks like it is trying, but then seems
to forget about it.
Is anyone else having this problem?
Runs but very, very slowly.
Way too slowly for me to use, even as
William Robb wrote:
Sad, but true.
My son quit school and got a job driving an ice cream truck, for money he
couldn't have made for another 5 or 6 *YEARS* following his chosen line of
education and work.
Why is it sad?
Universities have done an excellent job of brainwashing the masses into
Astonishing! Is the area a park or something?
Keith McG
John Coyle wrote:
Taken less than 100 metres from where I live, this is the first of this
genera I have ever seen so close.
Glad I wasn't capable of being lunch!
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4735921
Comments
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/25/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will defend the guys right to get up on a soap box, or write on the
Internet, but I do not think he should be given official sanction or tax
payer dollars to do so. Are we required to support every crackpot who
wishes to
Love the sky. Find the whatever it is running up from the bottom
a bit distracting. But...wow!
Keith McG
Jack Davis wrote:
A reward for taking another drive around a local landmark range of
hills. Again, taken a few year back. Rice field with winter catch
rain.
The bronze tone was not my
David Savage wrote:
I like it. Spooky.
But I think it needs to have the earth accentuated the trees
lightened up. Something like this (I hope you don't mind):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/photo9_DSV.jpg
Of course I don't mind! This is just what I was looking for! Goes
along with
Brian Walters wrote:
Very dramatic sky but I agree it lacks something - possibly a bit too
much darkness on the left hand side. I prefer it cropped to remove
about 25 % on the left and a bit off the top.
Thanks! I think this is the right track.
Certainly not the sort of environment where
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Pardon me saying this Tom: but the run about like naked animals part
sounds very ethnocentric in my ears. To be totally strait with you, I find
it rather offensive.
...like naked animals...
I don't find it offensive, just incomprehensible.
Humans originally took to wearing
Mark Roberts wrote:
You should go to a college/university to learn about something if the
goal of your learning is *learning*. If the goal of your learning is
getting a job, go to trade school because it's a situation in which
everyone wins: Your future employer wins, the trade school you go
graywolf wrote:
As far as I know the US government defines Median income as the middle
of the population, not the middle of the dollar amount. So in this case
Keith is correct.
I hope I'm right!
I'll be in a room in about 4 hours with my introductory stats
class. It would be a bit of a
Bob Shell wrote:
On Jul 25, 2006, at 3:49 AM, Don Williams wrote:
Someone posted a bit about the 'moon landing was filmed in Death
Valley
lunatics' the other day. Try this one for /real /bullshit:
http://email.latimes.com/cgi-bin1/DM/y/e5td0LgybQ0G2B0HjO40EF
Which part do you consider
Warning: Office friendly but don't get caught in one.
This is from earlier in the year:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/keith.mcguinness/ph/peso/photos/photo9.html
Confession: for some reason, it doesn't quite work for me but I
don't know why.
All and any comments appreciated.
(I admit that I
I like it too -- interesting.
Keith McG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/25/2006 7:50:57 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_020.htm
I've always meant to photograph this rather interesting vegi, but it's
usually eaten
mike wilson wrote:
From: Keith McGuinness [EMAIL PROTECTED]
graywolf wrote:
Well, I like the idea of killing everyone who has an income above the
median, they are resource hogs having more than their fair share of
everything.
You want to kill half the population on the planet?
Seems
Bob Shell wrote:
On Jul 23, 2006, at 8:51 PM, Keith McGuinness wrote:
Can I play too?
I get 80 hits for KA McGuinness and 1,000 for Keith McGuinness.
Do I win?
Yep, you get a free listing in the McGuinness Book of World Records.
Ha!
That'll be a very thin book.
Keith McG
--
PDML
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/23/2006 5:47:44 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You want us all to go back to a hunter-gatherer life-style? How
could we use or Pentax's then?
I meant a scientific formula based on nature, re animals, re carrying
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/24/2006 8:08:55 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is difficult to argue that the hunter-gathering lifestyle,
probably the earliest human lifestyle, is not natural. Then some
societies developed agriculture. At what point do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Defining overpopulation strictly in terms of the whole world ignores actual
facts. Carrying capacity for animals may be done that way, but human food and
other resources are not distributed by some world government. If carrying
capacity is defined as ration of
Bob Shell wrote:
On Jul 23, 2006, at 4:05 PM, DagT wrote:
I´ve never
understood why the west does not use it´s technology and wealth to
become independent of oil.
You don't understand that the President is a Texas oil man. So long
as he is in the White House nothing much will be done
graywolf wrote:
Well, I like the idea of killing everyone who has an income above the
median, they are resource hogs having more than their fair share of
everything.
You want to kill half the population on the planet?
Seems a little drastic!
Keith McG
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
graywolf wrote:
Most ethanol is synthesized from petroleum these days, except for the
stuff we drink. So is a large amounts of the hydrocarbon chemicals used
in industry. Much of our clothing is made from petroleum. And of course
most of the plastics we use. Fuel is actually far from the
Tim Øsleby wrote:
I get no hits for P. J. Ailing at all.
G
How about trying P. J. Alling? ;-)
I like PJ Ailing!
Hi, who are you?
Hi, I'm PJ, ailing.
Oh, sorry to hear that.
Keith McG
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
that Godfrey is more than three times as famous as
P.J.? And does it mean I am nearly 12 times as famous?
Can I play too?
I get 80 hits for KA McGuinness and 1,000 for Keith McGuinness.
Do I win?
Keith McG
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
graywolf wrote:
No, everone on the planet. As you continue executing them, the median
income goes down until one person has it all. Then you have to get rid
of him.
LOL!
Wouldn't you have to get rid of half of him? Then a quarter? Then...
Logic does not seem to be the forte of most of the
Ed Maruyama wrote:
hi folks.. haven't seen (yet) the movie... but just wanted to share my
thoughts...
I've been here in Iqaluit for the past 3 years or so... honestly... in this
tiny time frame, I
*think* things are changing for real...
It is normal for things to change. When you stop
DagT wrote:
The opinion of the IWC is on the move, and one of the reasons is that
some smaller countries are tired of being used by the people who are
against whaling. If anybody has been bought it has happened on both
sides.
Exactly: it has been both sides, getting in countries which
No chance of you being lost in the crowd, DagT, I would have
thought! 8-)
Keith McG
DagT wrote:
Den 22. jul. 2006 kl. 03.24 skrev Keith McGuinness:
DagT wrote:
The Norwegian name is Vågehval, and in latin Balaenoptera
acutorostrata. I´m not sure what it is called in English
Norman Baugher wrote:
ROTFLMAO...
From: DagT
snip So, the natural
balance has been shifted by us long ago and now we have to control
all parts to providesnip
But DagT is right (for at least some environments).
For instance, it is known that indigenous Australians, in
northern
Bob W wrote:
[...]
Norway has a traditional history of whale hunting. Australian
aborigines have a traditional history of hunting dugong (which
may be threatened). The former is condemned but the latter is
allowed. Go figure.
It's quite easy to figure, actually. One of them is
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I wouldn't characterize the message as a 'state of panic'. creditable srcs
have verified the science conclusively... Including my contacts at DRI and
NASA,JPL. Its simply a wake up call... Not a piece of fiction.
The science has certainly NOT been verified anywhere
Don Sanderson wrote:
Gorgeous!
I would like to withdraw my entry. ;-(
Mark Roberts
Although I first wondered where I was going to get an architecture
shot for this month's PUG, I ended up finding several that I liked. My
current PESO is one of the ones I decided not to use for the PUG,
Norman Baugher wrote:
They used fires to modify the landscape to produce a given resultnot
balance nature (which is impossible for humans to do).
That was part of the point.
Is the indigenous burning natural? If it is not, why not?
And it is impossible for humans to balance for the
David Savage wrote:
Considering Keith is in Darwin it's more likely to be a beach at low tide.
Darwin is in the tropical north of Australia and during our summer
months experiences monsoonal weather patterns. So winter is the dryer
part of the year.
On 7/22/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe cliched, but nice. Well done.
I suppose since sunrises occur over and over again that they might
technically match the definition of the word cliche, but they are never
cliche as far as I'm concerned.
Tom C.
I agree, actually. But some sunsets
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Good capture Keith. Nice composition - it moves my eyes thru it nicely.
Great exposure, but perhaps the background is a tad soft in the focus
department?
Yep, it is a bit soft in the focus department.
Excuse (long winded)...
1) I was using my Coolpix snapshot camera,
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I shot a car show today. Among the slightly strange things you see at
these shows are dolls. Classic car folks position dolls looking
through the grilles of their cars. Why? I don't know. Dolls on lawn
chairs are popular as well. Here's an example:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
All I'm after is that you start thinking and studying the issues for
yourselves and don't let the fiction writers and the popular press,
driven by an anti-knowledge, anti-science, good-old-boy
administration of oil-rich and weapons-happy thieves, keep you
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Good capture Keith. Nice composition - it moves my eyes thru it nicely.
Great exposure, but perhaps the background is a tad soft in the focus
department?
Also just realised that some of the softness is probably due to
the smoke haze, which was quite considerable
DagT wrote:
The Norwegian name is Vågehval, and in latinBalaenoptera
acutorostrata. I´m not sure what it is called in English but
according to the International Whaling Commission there were about
18 of them in 2004. Not exactly extinct, and this is the type
that
John Francis wrote:
I note, with some amusement, that not only does the K100D
have a scene mode specifically for taking photographs of
your pets, but that in addition the icon for this selection
can be set to a representation of either a cat or a dog.
Suddenly I feel very ill...
Keith McG
DagT wrote:
I have acknowledges a couple of times that I probably should have
warned you, but I do see little understanding from some that these
things may occur. Also I as a foreigner find that I´m held
responsible for the effects of stupid laws in other countries.
I think you are just
DagT wrote:
If you can be prosecuted for finding something by accident on an
internet link you should stay off the internet.
Either that, or you are being more than a little bit paranoid.
They are not being paranoid.
It CAN happen. It DOES happen.
It IS stupid but, as Aaron's story
Warning: Office friendly but probably cliche!
Note: Not a Pentax shot; only had my Nikon CP4500 (alas).
The dry season (the equivalent of winter in more temperate
regions) has really set in here. Hardly a hint of rain and the
temperature plunging to 16 Celsius (61 F). 8-)
It's also the time
William Robb wrote:
Since the law itself is very open to individual interpretation, it is a bit
dangerous to have a picture of a naked child on a computer hard drive, even
if it is in a residual cache, rather than formally saved.
I really wish some of these Europeans would get it through
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/19/2006 5:54:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
istDL, 200mm f/4 SMC, iso 800. The image is cropped about 50%.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/IMGP24115x7cropweb.jpg
Walt
==
Very, very nice shot of
David Mann wrote:
That kind of thing is starting to happen here:
http://www.starcanterbury.co.nz/localnews/storydisplay.cfm?
storyid=3692452thesection=localnewsthesubsection=thesecondsubsection=
The link is incomplete but I found the story you were referring
to and it is the sort of thing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/19/2006 3:06:11 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I colleaque of mine lives very near the sea (most Danes do ;-).
When I visited him earlier this evening, I did this sunset image:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/193652447/
Christian wrote:
Jay Taylor wrote:
I have not been able to get out and do much shooting as of late since
I'm busy trying to move into a new home my wife and I are purchasing.
That coupled with the start of Salmon fishing season has kept me away
from my camera. This is another of my
DagT wrote:
Den 20. jul. 2006 kl. 06.05 skrev Keith McGuinness:
I am NOT saying that what you did is in anyway wrong but you've
got to remember that the LAWS in other countries might be
different, not only the customs.
Well, that only brings a new problem. How much do we have to know
Kenneth Waller wrote:
This is really no different than respecting the wishes of a friend when you
visit them. ie if you smoke he didn't like smoking in his house, you would
refrain from smoking when visiting him.
It's quite a bit different, actually.
Presumably you have some idea of your
DagT wrote:
In my view this is just an innocent child and if someone manages to
thinks anything perverted in relation to it the problem is in their
minds.
The trouble is that the laws in some places are such that you
could get charged with an offense just for looking at such a
photo,
Doug Franklin wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Interesting, I like it.
Paul
On Jul 13, 2006, at 4:53 AM, jim kerslake wrote:
Some evening colours for you...
Just a small illustration of Magic Hour light - falling on some
otherwise
quite dull vegetation.
There's something terribly
keith_w wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/12/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd just like to apologise for the war.
I'd like to apologize for Cotty's apology.
cheers,
frank
I'm sorry you said that...
Given the circumstances, I think that these apologies are in poor
taste.
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Mark Roberts wrote:
After yesterday's discovery of that old fungus shot, I decided to
revamp my fungus photo gallery. (And yes, I am a sad git to actually
have a gallery of fungus photos, aren't I? g)
http://www.robertstech.com/fungus.htm
I like the photo a lot but, alas, I don't think that the bird is
very attractive!
Keith McG
Jay Taylor wrote:
Here's a shot taken a couple months back with the *istDS with the
FA*300 f4.5 stacked with the F1.7X Adapter. This combo gives me a
510mm focal length and is not too shabby
I didn't look at the photo, so I can't comment on it.
But I do get bothered by people telling me what they think I need
to know.
Keith McG
Cotty wrote:
On 7/7/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
What you can see tells you what you need to know.
Arrogant bollocks!!!
--
It was a cat photo; that's enough for me!
I think all pet photos should carry a warning in the subject
line: [pet].
That way I could bin them more easily!
I have no doubt that some of them are excellent photos but they
simply do not interest me.
Keith McG
Cotty wrote:
On 7/7/06, Shel
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Extending ISO by manipulating the RAW data alone will not do as well
as exposing properly at a higher ISO setting.
Is *that* what this thread is about?
I would have thought that this should be obvious!
(I've been reading the thread but not always following it.)
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Regards
Keith McGuinness
School of Science Primary
AvK wrote:
The July PUG is open.
It can be viewed at http://pug.komkon.org
Thanks Adelheid!
My personal picks for the month:
Photo - Jostein; mystery - Wendy; interpretation - Sridhar.
Comments...
* Jostein: Curves in...
I don't usually go for abstract but I like this one.
Curtains blown by
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Keith McGuinness wrote:
As covers...
Desert solitaire
Word freak
Roswell
In that order.
Those are the ones that I might pick up and look at.
Thanks, Keith - that's what I want to know -- of course, it
says something about your taste in lit too :)
Oh
Tom C wrote:
I'll just say it again. If the PUG is simply a photo sharing site where
participants submit, look, test out their images, then there probably are
better mechanisms for doing so than a static webpage that must be manually
maintained once a month. If it's an artistic showcase,
Bob W wrote:
Architecture is difficult subject to photograph well because often
you're just making a record shot of someone else's work, which can be
rather dull. One of my favourite examples of making a clichéd subject
come alive again is this photo of the Taj Mahal by Steve McCurry:
Don Sanderson wrote:
This whole PUG thing is starting to sound like a bunch
of people sitting around watching a man die of thirst.
They all have a glass of water in their hand but all
they do is sit, and wait, expecting someone else to
save the poor guy.
Share my water!?
Architecture is
the problem.
Dave
At 12:29 PM 22/06/2006, Keith McGuinness wrote:
As a relative newbie here, I suggest this with great trepidation
and hesitation... I'm intrigued by the considerable drop in the
number of contributions from 2002-2004 to now. I've seen a few
people say why they don't
mike wilson wrote:
Is it a coincidence that forgot spells DIP?
I think not.
Dip.
Huh?
That one's gone right by me!
For the record: I just stuck forgot in at a few random places.
Keith McG
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
As covers...
Desert solitaire
Word freak
Roswell
In that order.
Those are the ones that I might pick up and look at.
Keith McG
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photos/annsan
I'm working on these hoping to get some graphic design work
- all are inspired or suited to (i hope!)
Sandra Hermann wrote:
Other I fell asleep and forgot to send the email the picture is sized
and everything for this month
LOL!
I'll put that under forgot and other! Should possibly also be
way too busy...to stay awake!
Thanks
Keith McG
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Here are results to date (responses from 16 people):
13 D) Forgot.
8 B) Couldn't come up with anything suitable.
8 E) Just way too busy.
4 A) Couldn't relate to the theme.
4 Q) Hey dude, I DID contribute!
5 R) Other (specify, if you like).
2 G) Don't use
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I don't want to start a flame war here, and before this escalates further,
perhaps you can define what constitutes a long time, Ann. How long does it
take for you to DL an image of about 150K? What do you mean when you say
it slows your system down?
I appreciate the
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jun 20, 2006, at 11:10 PM, Keith McGuinness wrote:
It is, however, I think important to remember that it is not
really the size of a single file that is important: it is the
size of ALL the files in the gallery.
Say 10 files of 200K each is going to take a while
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jun 21, 2006, at 3:12 AM, Keith McGuinness wrote:
But if you want to look at ALL the photos in the gallery you do
have to download ALL the full resolution files...
That's at your option. If the work is compelling enough to be worth
the time, you do
John Forbes wrote:
It is an unfortunate fact that the PUG is slowly dying.
Actually, if it is dying, it is a VERY SLOW process.
Here are counts for the last year (themed and open):
YearMonth Number
2005July21
2005August 19
2005September 17
John Forbes wrote:
If it is meant to be a showcase, why not have a panel of judges to select
the 50 best PAWs and PESOs each month, and then put them into a gallery?
Irfanview can produce a suitable gallery with thumnnails at the press of a
button, so there is little work involved.
Tom C wrote:
Actually those were some of my favorites...
Tom Trite
Mine too.
Can't say more; have to go or I will be late for kindy and have
to stand in the corner until recess.
Keith McG
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So what do you all do? Convert them all in a batch and just save
the converted versions as high quality photoshop files? Do you put the
RAW originals away somewhere, out of Elements 4.0?
Just an amateur...
I convert all and put them in a structured
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
