I thought it was to see the photographers in the mountain photographing you.
-Original Message-
>From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
>Subject: Re: OT: A different kind of bird photography
>
>Back in the day, we loved to fly low over Death Valley and the Salton Sea
>in o
Back in the day, we loved to fly low over Death Valley and the Salton Sea
in order to see the altimeter drop below zero.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 11:11 AM John wrote:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiAW6u4Yt1w
>
> 4:09
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiAW6u4Yt1w
4:09 specifically for Dan.
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
I dislike the Flickr presentation intensely, but will always endure it
to see your photos. Very nice work.
On 6/15/19 9:22 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
It's taken a while (and Flickr's latest "upgrade" hasn't helped
matters) but here's a small gallery of my photos from GFM this year:
Wonderful gallery Mark.
Dave
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 3:57 AM Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 15/6/19, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >It's taken a while (and Flickr's latest "upgrade" hasn't helped
> >matters) but here's a small gallery of my photos from GFM this year:
> >
>
On 15/6/19, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>It's taken a while (and Flickr's latest "upgrade" hasn't helped
>matters) but here's a small gallery of my photos from GFM this year:
>
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/166715344@N04/albums/72157709063314541
Bristling with quality as usual.
Splendid gallery. The water shots with moss are excellent. GFM is
obviously a very popular destination.
Alan C
On 16-Jun-19 03:22 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
It's taken a while (and Flickr's latest "upgrade" hasn't helped
matters) but here's a small gallery of my photos from GFM this year:
ped
> matters) but here's a small gallery of my photos from GFM this year:
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/166715344@N04/albums/72157709063314541
>
>
> --
> Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
> www.robertstech.com
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discus
bums/72157709063314541
>
>
>--
>Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
>www.robertstech.com
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>PDML@pdml.net
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the li
It's taken a while (and Flickr's latest "upgrade" hasn't helped
matters) but here's a small gallery of my photos from GFM this year:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/166715344@N04/albums/72157709063314541
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML
I hate it when a crapper backs up.
> On Jun 4, 2019, at 3:36 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 3:07 PM John wrote:
>
>> On 6/3/2019 17:57:55, Steve Cottrell wrote:
>>> On 2/6/19, John, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>>
I'm home.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the report John -
On 4/6/19, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Hopefully the Micky D's will be open, that was my back up crapper
MARK!!!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 3:07 PM John wrote:
> On 6/3/2019 17:57:55, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> > On 2/6/19, John, discombobulated, unleashed:
> >
> >> I'm home.
> >
> > Thanks for the report John - much appreciated.
> >
> > I'm planning on being there next year so I'll buy you that cup of coffee
>
On 6/3/2019 17:57:55, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 2/6/19, John, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm home.
Thanks for the report John - much appreciated.
I'm planning on being there next year so I'll buy you that cup of coffee at the
Maccy D's if it's open by then!
I hope to see you there.
The
On 2/6/19, John, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I'm home.
Thanks for the report John - much appreciated.
I'm planning on being there next year so I'll buy you that cup of coffee at the
Maccy D's if it's open by then!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and
|| (O) |Live
for not taking the contest too
seriously remains unblemished.
Didn't do a whole lot of nature PHOTOGRAPHY, but it was an interesting
weekend for seeing nature. While I was driving up a Pileated woodpecker
flew across the road right in front of me. It was there and then it was
gone, but it was plainly
I'm home. This was the first year I didn't have to rush back to get Baxter out
of kitty jail ... I mean the pet hotel.
Didn't win any prizes, so my record for not taking the contest too seriously
remains unblemished.
Didn't do a whole lot of nature PHOTOGRAPHY, but it was an interesting
Hi All,
"The photography that García Márquez did not like but ended up on the
cover of 'One Hundred Years of Solitude' " - that's the title of the
article in El Pais. This article is a story about how Rodrigo Moya, a
Mexican photographer, was taking a photo of the Nobel Prize-winn
That's the secret, if you want good Starbucks Coffee, buy the finished
product at a Barnes and Noble Cafe, (it's branded Starbucks but the
staff is trained by Barnes and Noble), not only is the coffee actually
good, but they have a large supply of reading material to enjoy while
drinking the
I avoid Starbucks. Terrible coffee.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 1:36 PM P. J. Alling
wrote:
> Go the a Starbucks that's in a Barnes and Noble bookstore and you'll see
> some of the finest realistic plastic replica food items in their
Go the a Starbucks that's in a Barnes and Noble bookstore and you'll see
some of the finest realistic plastic replica food items in their display
cases.
On 4/29/2019 12:34 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
The first part, about photographing food to make it look better, was quite
interesting and
I had received the video in an email, did a Google search, a few seconds showed
that it was the one I saw, but the one I saw didn't have serving suggestions,
so I guess it was shortened.
On April 29, 2019 9:34:10 AM PDT, "Daniel J. Matyola"
wrote:
>The first part, about photographing food to
The first part, about photographing food to make it look better, was quite
interesting and at points hilarious. The rest of the video was cooking and
serving short-cuts, and not so fascinating.
Many restaurants in Japan have display cases outside next to the door with
plastic replicas of the
Or commercial trickery, you decide, but some handy tricks if you want
food to look good in your photos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MflT0I7ZPCs
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
I'm registered. There look to be about 34 places left.
I *AM* camping, so y'all better bring your rain gear.
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The article says it's Fuji FP-100c, which is out of production, so he's using it
while it lasts ... 'every shot he takes “will be one shot less in the world.” '
On 4/11/2019 09:29:42, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
A Crown Graphic with Polaroid film? That really IS "old fashioned."
Then again,
A Crown Graphic with Polaroid film? That really IS "old fashioned."
Then again, In February, I was photographed by a Polaroid photographer in
San Jose, CA.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:13 AM Eric Weir wrote:
>
>
>
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/10/style/street-photographer-jean-andre-antoine.html
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA USA
eew...@bellsouth.net
"What does it mean...that the world is so beautiful?"
- Mary Oliver
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 1/31/2019 16:38:58, Stanley Halpin wrote:
Every once in a while, every day or two maybe, take a shot of your wrist
watch or other reliable indicator of the local time. If your camera record
of time is off by minutes or hours, this makes it easier to recalibrate the
time in the exif files.
Not a bad idea!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 7:52 AM wrote:
> I've been tempted to just set mine to GMT and be done with it
>
> On February 1, 2019 5:43:26 AM PST, David J Brooks
> wrote:
> >and what about us folk that nebver change the
I've been tempted to just set mine to GMT and be done with it
On February 1, 2019 5:43:26 AM PST, David J Brooks wrote:
>and what about us folk that nebver change the time on the camera for
>the time changes.:-)
>
>Dave
>
>On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 4:39 PM Stanley Halpin
> wrote:
>>
>> Every once
and what about us folk that nebver change the time on the camera for
the time changes.:-)
Dave
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 4:39 PM Stanley Halpin
wrote:
>
> Every once in a while, every day or two maybe, take a shot of your wrist
> watch or other reliable indicator of the local time. If your
Every once in a while, every day or two maybe, take a shot of your wrist watch
or other reliable indicator of the local time. If your camera record of time
is off by minutes or hours, this makes it easier to recalibrate the time in the
exif files. Important particularly if you have more than
http://digg.com/video/baby-elephant-seals-photographer?utm
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
I'd like to make a suggestion going forward, though it won't help you
recover what has already been lost. I do hope you're able to get your
work back.
Implement something local like FreeNAS, which uses ZFS and software
RAID. You'll need some hardware and a few drives. For example, I
have a 1U
> On 30 November 2018 at 19:42 Steve Cottrell wrote:
>
>
> On 30/11/18, Alan C, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Laptops have an advantage.
>
> That stirred a memory. I have only ever owned one desktop computer in my
> life. Always had portable machines after that. Don't know why, probably
e files to one of the other drives and then
> > started backing that up to the other. At which point we had one of those
> > micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot.
> > Now neither of the drives is responsive - about four years' work. Did I
>
gt; off site. The off site one croaked so I had a replacement to format.
> > Before that kicked off, I added some files to one of the other drives and
> > then started backing that up to the other. At which point we had one of
> > those micro disruptions, where all the lights fli
On 30/11/18, Alan C, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Laptops have an advantage.
That stirred a memory. I have only ever owned one desktop computer in my life.
Always had portable machines after that. Don't know why, probably part of the
job (being mobile). The wife gets hand-me-downs so we're
of those
micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. Now
neither of the drives is responsive - about four years' work. Did I mention
I hate digital photography?
Ouchies! I hope the third drive has the images duplicated & you can recover.
Third drive was already
hate
digital photography?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
of
> those micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers
> reboot. Now neither of the drives is responsive - about four years' work.
> Did I mention I hate digital photography?
> > >
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.
esponsive - about four years' work. Did I
> > mention I hate digital photography?
> >
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
added some files to one of the other drives and then started
backing that up to the other. At which point we had one of those micro
disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. Now neither
of the drives is responsive - about four years' work. Did I mention I hate
digital p
is
responsive - about four years' work. Did I mention I hate digital
photography?
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
ears' work. Did I
> mention I hate digital photography?
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
--
PDM
some files to one of the other drives and then
started backing that up to the other. At which point we had one of those
micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. Now
neither of the drives is responsive - about four years' work. Did I mention
I hate digital photography
the other drives and then started
backing that up to the other. At which point we had one of those micro
disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. Now neither
of the drives is responsive - about four years' work. Did I mention I hate
digital photography?
--
Pau
off, I added some files to one of the other drives and then
> > started backing that up to the other. At which point we had one of those
> > micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. Now
> > neither of the drives is responsive - about four years' wor
to the other. At which point we had one of those
micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. Now
neither of the drives is responsive - about four years' work. Did I mention
I hate digital photography?
Ouchies! I hope the third drive has the images duplicated & you can rec
that up to the other. At which point we had one of those
> > micro disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot.
> > Now neither of the drives is responsive - about four years' work. Did I
> > mention I hate digital photography?
> >
> --
to one of the other drives and then started
backing that up to the other. At which point we had one of those micro
disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. Now neither
of the drives is responsive - about four years' work. Did I mention I hate
digital photography
micro
disruptions, where all the lights flicker - and computers reboot. Now neither
of the drives is responsive - about four years' work. Did I mention I hate
digital photography?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
its truthfulness:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-6405507/The-stunning-winners-panoramic-photography-awards-revealed.html
The round-shaped rainbow with the arc exceeding 180 degrees that did not get
distorted despite panoramic stitching.
My first reaction that it is a lens-produced
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:37 AM Igor PDML-StR wrote:
> This shot got me wondering about its truthfulness:
> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-6405507/The-stunning-winners-panoramic-photography-awards-revealed.html
> The round-shaped rainbow with the arc exce
rs-panoramic-photography-awards-revealed.html
>The round-shaped rainbow with the arc exceeding 180 degrees that did
>not
>get distorted despite panoramic stitching.
>
>My first reaction that it is a lens-produced halo overlaid over the
>image.
>I've never seen rainbows exceeding 180 d
This shot got me wondering about its truthfulness:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-6405507/The-stunning-winners-panoramic-photography-awards-revealed.html
The round-shaped rainbow with the arc exceeding 180 degrees that did not
get distorted despite panoramic stitching
Am 21.11.18 um 03:07 schrieb Daniel J. Matyola:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-6405507/The-stunning-winners-panoramic-photography-awards-revealed.html
Their definition of a panoramic photo is a joke: any old snap cropped to
a ratio of 2:1 or more. Sorry, but not in my
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-6405507/The-stunning-winners-panoramic-photography-awards-revealed.html
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Thank you, Mark for the book recommendation.
I took a quick glimpse, and I've found some of the clinical cases it
uses as examples quite fascinating.
Human's body, and especially human's brain is such a fascinating and
challenging topic! I think we know more about the physics of remote
Stop peeking at me! ;-)
And what are you doing in my bathroom, anyway?
Larry Colen Thu, 25 Oct 2018 09:34:27 -0700 wrote:
That might explain why the guy in the mirror is so damn good looking.
Daniel J. Matyola wrote on 10/25/18 9:17 AM:
Igor said:
"I'd say that a large portion
That might explain why the guy in the mirror is so damn good looking.
Daniel J. Matyola wrote on 10/25/18 9:17 AM:
Igor said:
"I'd say that a large portion of what we SEE is what we THINK what we see,
i.e. a large portion of the image that we see is done in the processing
(in the brain), - and
"Daniel J. Matyola" wrote:
>Igor said:
>
>"I'd say that a large portion of what we SEE is what we THINK what we see,
>i.e. a large portion of the image that we see is done in the processing
>(in the brain), - and not just what is recorded by the sensor(s) (the
>eyes). "
>
>That is very true, as
Igor said:
"I'd say that a large portion of what we SEE is what we THINK what we see,
i.e. a large portion of the image that we see is done in the processing
(in the brain), - and not just what is recorded by the sensor(s) (the
eyes). "
That is very true, as many experiments and optical
,
there is not much of thinking happening.
:-)
Cheers,
Igor
John Francis Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:30:02 -0700 wrote:
A whole lot of photography isn't recording what we actually see.
(or, to be pedantic, what we think we actually see)
Some examples:
o A black-and-white print (except for a few
as needed. Making
it any simpler would be an insult to my intelligence.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
Subject: Re: OT: The Future of Photography is Code
Igor PDML-StR wrote on 10/24/18 3:55 PM:
Igor PDML-StR wrote on 10/24/18 3:55 PM:
But I hear you that it would be nice to have the camera doing a more
careful metering based on the entire image, not just a small portion.
And to do that, essentially, in real time (as opposed to pre-metering,
which is what happening now)
g art.
Cheers,
Igor
P. J. Alling Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:39:47 -0700 wrote:
That depends in this case on how you define photography, is it an art or a
craft, in photography you are taking something that's already there and
recording it. The photographer applies his skills in camera and in
proces
Larry, I suspect you are making some inadvertent switching in the logic
here.
The part of the in-camera software (that does optimization for JPEG)
is actually "post-processing". I.e. it is what happens after the RAW image
has been acquired by the sensor, and is being converted to JPEG.
I
A whole lot of photography isn't recording what we actually see.
(or, to be pedantic, what we think we actually see)
Some examples:
o A black-and-white print (except for a few individuals)
o Long exposures of waterfalls (or, for that matter, any of my panned
motorsports shots
t;Igor PDML-StR"
Subject: Re: OT: The Future of Photography is Code
While I agree that there is a certain limit of how much can be done AFTER
the photographic information is recorded. (Note the careful language
here!)
But the software can play a big role in actually recording that
phot
ding a scene, and are actually generating it, which is art not
photography. Personally I prefer my art to be produced by humans not
by
machines mainly because machine art is kinda dull.
On 10/23/2018 10:10 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/22/the-future-of-photography-is-cod
those images. (What is called "creative effects" in cameras and
cellphones.)
Cheers,
Igor
P. J. Alling Tue, 23 Oct 2018 07:35:08 -0700 wrote:
There's really only so much you can do with code, before you're no
longer
recording a scene, and are actually generating it, which is art
That depends in this case on how you define photography, is it an art or
a craft, in photography you are taking something that's already there
and recording it. The photographer applies his skills in camera and in
processing to make it better in some way. If he's (English makes this
the non
ou can communicate your vision, then it's the appropriate tool.
On 10/23/2018 10:33, P. J. Alling wrote:
There's really only so much you can do with code, before you're no longer
recording a scene, and are actually generating it, which is art not
photography. Personally I prefer my art to be produ
can legally affect that software to boost
>those images. (What is called "creative effects" in cameras and
>cellphones.)
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>Igor
>
>
>
>P. J. Alling Tue, 23 Oct 2018 07:35:08 -0700 wrote:
>
>There's really only so much you can do with co
as and
cellphones.)
Cheers,
Igor
P. J. Alling Tue, 23 Oct 2018 07:35:08 -0700 wrote:
There's really only so much you can do with code, before you're no longer
recording a scene, and are actually generating it, which is art not
photography. Personally I prefer my art to be produced by
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 02:46:25PM +, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
> >En martes, 23 de octubre de 2018 16:12:45 CEST, Daniel J. Matyola
> > escribi??:
>
> https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/22/the-future-of-photography-is-code/Dan
> Matyolahttp://www.pentaxphotogalle
>En martes, 23 de octubre de 2018 16:12:45 CEST, Daniel J. Matyola
> escribió:
https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/22/the-future-of-photography-is-code/Dan
Matyolahttp://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola--
Very interesting and true. Thanks.
I have a friend who has a smart phone
There's really only so much you can do with code, before you're no
longer recording a scene, and are actually generating it, which is art
not photography. Personally I prefer my art to be produced by humans
not by machines mainly because machine art is kinda dull.
On 10/23/2018 10:10 AM
https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/22/the-future-of-photography-is-code/
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
Saw that in PetaPixel.
On 8/17/2018 20:55, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
https://twistedsifter.com/videos/the-power-of-the-middle-line-in-art-photography-and-film/?utm
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
https://twistedsifter.com/videos/the-power-of-the-middle-line-in-art-photography-and-film/?utm
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Some nice images here:
https://www.boredpanda.com/underwater-photographer-of-the-year-contest-winners-2018/
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
On 4/25/2018 03:10, Larry Colen wrote:
I just ran across this link on a friend’s facebook page.
http://www.erikjohanssonphoto.com/
There is some fun stuff on his page.
--
Larry Colen
l...@red4est.com
I've seen most of those before. Definitely different.
--
Science - Questions we may
Sure is different and creative.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen" <l...@red4est.com>
Subject: OT Erik Johansson surreal photography
I just ran across this link on a friend’s fac
I just ran across this link on a friend’s facebook page.
http://www.erikjohanssonphoto.com/
There is some fun stuff on his page.
--
Larry Colen
l...@red4est.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
My impression was that there was a kind of recall or stop distribution
order or something 60 mil? I saw a pane listed for $27 somewhere..
but less on ebay. Inerestinglyone man ray stamp sold for $4.++ on ebay.
It would be good to find some answers - i did use some back then and
Thanks for asking! I did a short search to see if I could answer your
questions. Nope. I see nothing about rarity (60 million sheets produced…) nor
about any controversy. One site with four sheets for sale at $12.99 each, not
quite double face value of the stamps so not unreasonable. Also I did
I bought a few "panes" of this 2002 issue - I have two left and have
been toying with selling one, but looking at listings on line I'm
surprised they are
available for as little as they are. None of the listings mention that
they were rather quickly pulled from distribution because the heirs
Doesn't take much creative. There's a lot of formula involved photographing
(high school) "seniors". It's a big business nowadays and there's a lot of
support for "how to do it".
What you need MOST is people skills for working with anxious teenagers.
Acne & bad hair days are temporary things.
I may be the original source of the wristband idea, I remember recommending it
quite a few years ago and have seen it spread to other events.
On April 12, 2018 8:16:14 AM PDT, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
>Larry,
>
>I bet that guy's reaction felt quite rewarding for you.
>Nice!
>
Perhaps two?
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Igor PDML-StR
Sent: 12 April, 2018 6:44 PM
To: PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: portrait photography
_I_ don't have one. :-)
Bob W-PDML Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:40:44 -0700 wrote:
Could you wear one of each so they only photograph your good
_I_ don't have one. :-)
Bob W-PDML Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:40:44 -0700 wrote:
Could you wear one of each so they only photograph your good side?
On 12 Apr 2018, at 16:17, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Larry,
I bet that guy's reaction felt quite rewarding for you.
Nice!
Indeed, often, when people
Could you wear one of each so they only photograph your good side?
> On 12 Apr 2018, at 16:17, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
>
> Larry,
>
> I bet that guy's reaction felt quite rewarding for you.
> Nice!
>
> Indeed, often, when people dump to Facebook all snaps they took without
Larry,
I bet that guy's reaction felt quite rewarding for you.
Nice!
Indeed, often, when people dump to Facebook all snaps they took
without _ANY_ filtering, - the probability of some ugly-looking photos
(awkward poses, facial expressions, etc.) is high. Hence the perception.
And, as we
Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Nice story!
I can feel how fulfilling it was for the photographer to hear that
reaction.
Personally, I consider doing that type of photo job as a big challenge.
snip...
Soon after, I received a surprising e-mail from that dancer, apologizing
for her reaction, and
fo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
--
-- Photography takes an instant out of time, altering life by holding
it still. Dorothea Lange
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/list
were also
> puzzled by such an abrupt reaction. (It was one of the "home" dance
> communities for us, - so quite a few dancers in that community knew me.)
>
>
> A week later, I posted the gallery of photos from that dance party online,
> to my photography web site. While p
eaction, but honored that request. I saw that a few
other dancers were also puzzled by such an abrupt reaction. (It was
one of the "home" dance communities for us, - so quite a few dancers in
that community knew me.)
A week later, I posted the gallery of photos from that dance party onlin
101 - 200 of 6926 matches
Mail list logo