Hi ,
I have the opportunity to acquire a used FA 85 f1.4 but in Like new
condition complete with original box manual packing etc
How does it perform on the K10D/K20D or K7 ? ( currently own a K10D
but will probably get the K7 soon)
What would be a reasonable price to pay for it ?
Regards
Well the asking price is approx USD 1300 I may be able to negotiate
down a bit 10% or so. Given that one can get a new 77 limited f1.7
for under $800 any opinions on the choice ?
Regards
Patrick Genovese
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:35 PM, CarlGca...@cegs.net wrote:
I bought one from BH
I tried this out but in M mode the camera still shifts both the
aperture and shutter speed.
Regards
Patrick Genovese
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Patrick Genovese
patrick.genovese...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll try it out and report back
tnx regards
Patrick Genovese
On Mon, Mar 16
I'll try it out and report back
tnx regards
Patrick Genovese
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:11 AM, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:
In custom settings, page 4, last item. Green Button in T Av M
Select #2, Tv Shift In Manual mode, set the aperture as you desire (I
tried
Hello,
When using the Auto Bracketing function in Manual Exposure Mode on the
K10D it seems to only adjust the exposure by shifting the aperture..
Is there any way to Make it shift the exposure using the shutter speed
instead ?
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
Where is that on the K20 coz if it exists on the K10 it must be
staring at me in the face an I can't see it :-)
Regards
Patrick Genovese
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Paul Stenquist
pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
I haven't had occasion to look for it on the K10D, but the K20D has
Does anyone use / has used one of the two contenders ?
Regards
Patrick Genovese
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Carlos Royo carlos_r...@teleline.es wrote:
Thibouille escribió:
It is HSM as a couple of newer revised Sigma lenses.
But, it sports HSM only. No screwdrive AF. Don't
Ping Any takers ?
Regards
Patrick Genovese
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Patrick Genovese
patrick.genovese...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone had the opportunity to work with and or compare the
Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 II HSM and the Tamron 70-200 f/2.8.
I'm thinking of getting one
quite a lot of
theatre work. The tamron is known to be noisier and probably slower on
the AF front since it relies on screw drive AF.
The perfect solution would be a combo of the Tammy's supposedly
superior optics in the sigma body level body.
Regards
Patrick Genovese
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009
especially at the
200mm but the sigma seems to enjoy some advantages in respect of
faster AF, better handling and overall build quality.
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML
to project a flat-field image.
Also, it has new internal coatings.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
Hi,
I tried the utility to enable the debug menu. and it seems to work fine.
Now does anyone have any info on the correct usage of the debug menu
especially wrt af correction.
Regards
Patrick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
be coz it is correcting for a shorter
focal length.
Regards
Patrick
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:34 PM, John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 8 May 2008 11:02:54 +0200, Patrick Genovese wrote
To be honest I had the same concern prior to buying the lens but as
it turns out the zoom
I have the bigma and ...
1. Does SR work effectively?
Yes but not as effectively as at the short end.. I estimate the
effectiveness at the long end (above 300mm) to be around 1 - 1 1/2
stops.
2. Is the lens type displayed correctly in the EXIF i.e. Sigma 50-500 EX?
No ACR just says sigma
the lens in a camera bag.
One last question, if I may, is the zoom control overly stiff in operation?
(it was on the 135-400 but that isn't/wasn't an EX lens)
Regards,
John
On Thu, 8 May 2008 09:01:25 +0200, Patrick Genovese wrote
I have the bigma and ...
1. Does SR work
Hi
has anyone had the opportunity to compare the Metz 58AF-1 P/S to the
Pentax 540fgz.
Any features that are missing / extra ... What build quality, exposure
accuracy etc...
Rgds
Patrick
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Pentax AF-360FGZ
2.
Hi
It seems that one can get a significant improvement to the K10D's AF
performance ... read this thread:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/25711-k10d-update-model-revision-8-1-yes-no.html
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
, 2008 at 5:52 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 4:42 PM, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He got the lenses to my place and upon looking through the viewfinder
I was horrified
K10D what is the risk of the fungus getting to my own lenses via the
body.
I've never had a lens with fungus on it so I don't have much
experience in this regard.
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
: to make sure that
you can always get back to an unmodified original RAW file.
Godfrey
On Mar 20, 2008, at 4:11 AM, Patrick Genovese wrote:
I actually wasn't smart enough to decipher the description of the
problem. Too bad... I'm here in Hawaii on vacation and LR1.4 works
just fine
Be careful there are issues with export etc.
Hopefully the 1.4.1 update won't take too long to ship
Regards
Patrick
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:49 AM, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a small heads up.. Lightroom
Hello Everyone,
Just a small heads up.. Lightroom 1.4 has some issues dealing with
DNG files.. Adobe has pulled the updated.
See here:
http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/03/important_lightroom_14_and_cam.html
Regards
Patrick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
This is the way I do in in PS.
1. Add a new layer and fill it with 50% gray (RGB 128,128,128) Set
the layer blend mode to overlay
2. Use Filter/Noise/Add Noise Tick Gaussian + Monochromatic.
3. Adjust noise amount to taste I usually end up with anything between
0.5% to 15%. This naturally
directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Cool shot... I like it a lot, its very err.. graphic bold.
Patrick
On Jan 18, 2008 9:33 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a huge Merc dealership at the Brooklands complex just outside
London where my son was having a driving lesson one Sunday. I wondered
amongst the exhibits
Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the spiral staircase at the Vatican museums.
http://tinyurl.com/2moj6q
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?topic_id=1481msg_id=00NyWZphoto_id=6827086photo_sel_index=0
Your comments/ciritique are welcome!
Regards
Patrick Genovese
Hi Dave,
I have the 28-75 I had got it back in '04 for use on my film bodies.
It is a great lens on both film and the K10 you won't be disappointed.
Regards
Patrick
On Jan 12, 2008 3:33 PM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 1:52 PM, Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED
This is the spiral staircase at the Vatican museums.
http://tinyurl.com/2moj6q
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?topic_id=1481msg_id=00NyWZphoto_id=6827086photo_sel_index=0
Your comments/ciritique are welcome!
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
?photo_id=6812654
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
great pictures. I'm sure this
one will to.
Dave
On Jan 11, 2008 12:24 PM, Patrick Genovese
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 70-200 f/2.8 from Tamron seems to materialising
http://www.tamron.com/lenses/prod/70200_di.asp
If it is as good as their 28-75 f/2.8 its going to be a very
The 70-200 f/2.8 from Tamron seems to materialising
http://www.tamron.com/lenses/prod/70200_di.asp
If it is as good as their 28-75 f/2.8 its going to be a very
interesting piece of glass..
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
...
(it tied with smc Pentax-DA* 50-135mm f/2.8
http://www.ppmag.com/web-exclusives/2008/01/2008-hot-one-award-winners.html
)
A combination of these facts devalues the meaning of the contest
for me, and in some way, the magazine that publishes it.
Igor
Fri Jan 11 12:24:42 EST 2008
Patrick
://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML
To everyone who responded to this thread. Thank you all for your
input.. I think I will go for the Manfrotto 393 .. A wimberly is
simply outside my budged plus my existing ball head serves me just
fine except for the bigma. I guess getting a dedicated head for a
long lens is the better option
See here: http://www.aronsen.no/default.asp?ArtID=428
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
mount is the only choice.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Regards
Patrick
is designed for use on a monopod. I think there
are much better choices in Gimbal heads than Manfrotto. Maybe you
should look at Kirk or Wimberly. Perhaps Ken or Bill will jump in on
this. They've had some experience in this area. I have only lusted:-).
On Jan 8, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Patrick Genovese wrote
://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML
Hi,
The prices mentioned seem fair I''ll put in an offer and see what happens..
Regards
Patrick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I've been offered the M135 f/3.5 and the M200 f/4 (price yet to be determined)..
I''ve inspected the lenses and both are in great condition ... What''s
their performance like and what would be a reasonable price to pay for
them ?
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
If you are carrying lots of gear a good heavy duty padded waist belt
is an absolute must. I just got myself a Lowepro Vertex 200AW it is
superb. The waist belt transfers the weight to your pelvis and there
is very little weight on your shoulders.
I can easily carry 2DSLRs + accessories + 6
visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
/28/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/07, Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6471235
Comments/critique welcome :-)
One hell of a shot!!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier
Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6471235
Comments/critique welcome :-)
Regards
Patrick Genovese
===
Good capture, good action moment, good timing. I'd go in with
PS/Elements/something and lighten up the shadows a bit though
Great Shot, Lots of mood. Love it!
Rgds
Patrick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6471235
Comments/critique welcome :-)
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Lets face it Pentax lags behind on a number of fronts namely:
1. Sensor technology.
2. AF technology.
3. Speed (frame rates)
4. Incomplete lens line up
5. Incomplete body line up.
6. A number of silly niggles and quirks that annoy people and give
pentax bashers fuel for criticism even if
A while back tamron announced a 70-200 f/2.8. Has anyone heard
anything about it ... did it materialise or is it still vapourware ?
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
idle. They need to show drive,
innovation and launch the products that make a splash ie are
desirable, get talked about and sell.
On 9/18/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 18/09/07, Patrick Genovese, discombobulated, unleashed:
If pentax launched a Nikon D3 basher
. Other manufacturers seem to be able to do this quite quickly.
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
its composition
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
releases stimulate sales.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems to me that people are confusing out of production with
discontinued. As far as I understand, all camera companies produce their
lenses in batches
not an expert.
Thanks,
Glen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I have to say I'm very impressed.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
: http://www.jbuhler.com/book.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
http://tinyurl.com/32vk6g
This one nabbed me a gold medal in the Malta Photographic Sociey's
Open Annual Competition.
The Society's site can be found here. http://www.maltaphotographicsociety.org
Rgds
Patrick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
on the award!
Godfrey
On Aug 29, 2007, at 7:03 AM, Patrick Genovese wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/32vk6g
This one nabbed me a gold medal in the Malta Photographic Sociey's
Open Annual Competition.
The Society's site can be found here. http://
www.maltaphotographicsociety.org
--
PDML
, Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Would any kind soul who has access to a 50-500 check out one thing for me?
What is effective the max apterure at 400mm (or at least what does the
camera report the aperture to be. I realise that this will probably
be rounded the the nearest 1/2
am under the assumption that they are not coarse thread.
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
, John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:52:33 +0200, Patrick Genovese wrote
Hello Pentax
Please add this feature in the next firmware upgrade:
Add a feature to multiply the focal length reported by the lens by a
user entered factor e.g 1.4x 2x 1.7x and operate
). It
will work with 300mm as focal length. This is it.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML
is used.
I'm selling my 50-500 (posted here approx 2 weeks ago) as I don't need
the reach.
Also I find it a little large and unwieldy as it lengthens when zoomed
out fully.
Wendy
On 8/19/07, Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to be needing a long telezoom approx 400mm
-500 seems to be very popular for
PG this type of photography. How does it compare with 100-300 + 1.4x TC
PG combo ?
PG Regards
PG Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML
I'm going to be needing a long telezoom approx 400mm at the long end
for nature photography ... the 50-500 seems to be very popular for
this type of photography. How does it compare with 100-300 + 1.4x TC
combo ?
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
One more question... Does the K10D correct the focal length when you
add the Sigma TC ?
On 8/19/07, Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to be needing a long telezoom approx 400mm at the long end
for nature photography ... the 50-500 seems to be very popular for
this type
Hi everyone thanks for your feedback... I guess i''ll pass
Rgds
Patrick
On 7/25/07, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Makes a good hammer. :)
gonz
On 7/24/07, Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have the opportunity to buy this lens at a reasonable price. Is it any
good
Hi
I have the opportunity to buy this lens at a reasonable price. Is it any good ?
SMC PENTAX-FA 1:3.5-4.7 28-80mm
This one: http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/zooms/short/FA28-80f3.5-4.7.html
I intend using it on the K10D
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
I'm guessing that's the SSM-enabled K100D. Hopefully with a bigger buffer as
well.
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
as
opposed to 50-135.
Rgds
Patrick
On 6/21/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 01:00:11PM +0200, Patrick Genovese wrote:
Hi everyone,
I may be in a position to obtain an FA* 80-200 f/2.8 in virtually new
condition. As far as i know it is reputed to be a fantastic
bokeh but also in digital
problems such as sensor flare CA ?
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
and for the little flash photography that i do it should be
fine.
I'm concerned about trigger voltages etccc. and potential damage to the K10 ???
Any experiences/opinions shared here would be very apreceated.
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
be nice. I think there's always going to be a
considerable tradeofff for ISO 3200 speed. CMOS sensors don't seem to have
much of a real advantage there.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My wish list:
1. Faster and more
My wish list:
1. Faster and more accurate AF (I know it is a contradiction in terms
but we know it is possible err. dark side)
2. Adjustable AF settings ( a user should be able to correct
back/front focusing)
3. Larger sensor (1.3 crop factor) but only if current DA lenses cover
the 1.3 crop
to wait a bit until i've put away enough
funds for the right option.
It would be nice to be able to factor in the new SDM lenses into the
shortlist but unfortunatley they get eliminated because I want to use
this setup on my MZ-S as well as the K10D.
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Anyone out there with first hand experience with any one of these combos ?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
much ;-)
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: Long telezoom --- What to choose ?
Anyone out there with first hand experience with any one
works and would need a very compelling
PG argument to ditch it but I may consider getting something like C1Pro
PG for that extra bit of edge when you really need it.
PG What's the general opinion on C1Pro vs the others ?
PG --
PG Regards
PG Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
like C1Pro
for that extra bit of edge when you really need it.
What's the general opinion on C1Pro vs the others ?
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
of compressing dng files I have found is to open them in
ACR make a small change and click done.
Has anyone come across a better method ?
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In general I believe Pentax cameras are very well made.
I tend to agree with you on that point. In my 10 years of pentax
ownership I have had only 2 other faults.
1. Spring on the popup flash of my MZ-5n won't poup the flash and that
was after 8 years of use.
2. On a brand new FA 50 f1.4 there
-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi All,
I will be travelling to austria next week and will be based in Pfunds
in the tyrol reigon. Any PDMLers from the area ?
Would be nice to meet up !
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
with a six K retainer, but that's
better than twenty K. I think the Brits and their social welfare
state should go directly to hell.
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hi
The lens roadmap shows a 55-300 in the pipleine.. Does anyone know
whether this will be an SDM lens ?
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
http://www.tamron.co.jp/en/news/release_2007/0307_a001.html
Regards
Patrick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to remove the SD
card containing the update first.
Hope this helps,
John
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
as it easily identifiable.
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
/02/07, jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 00:22:25 +0100, Patrick Genovese wrote:
I have found that with long exposures, the NR takes a long time to do it's
thing. almost as long as the exposure itself depending on what shutter
speed used.
So I turn NR off for long
Hi,
I've been reading that some of you have opted to turn of the NR on your K10Ds.
For those of you who have come to the conclusion that IQ is better
with the NR off what sort of problems was the NR causing ?
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
end lenses?
--
Leon
http://www.bluering.org.au
http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
Patrick Genovese wrote:
Thanks for the info... I was hoping that someone would trash at least
one of the combos making my decision easier :-) The problem with
Malta is that you have to buy almost
://www.bluering.org.au
http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
Patrick Genovese wrote:
You know what would be really really really nice a pentax 135-400
f/4.5 it would make a great pair with the upcoming 50-135 f/2.8...
the 60-250 is a bit of a compromise ...had it been a 120-300 or maybe
350 it would be a much
a lesson taught to me in
few days to come.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
on closed circuits, an air show or wildlife on the
African veldt. The DA*60-250/4 seems the longest lens I could
possibly be interested in.
Godfrey
On Jan 31, 2007, at 8:21 AM, Patrick Genovese wrote:
Yes it would be like carting a howitzer around but damn useful i used
the sigma 120-300
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Patrick
On 1/30/07, Jan van Wijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Patrick,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:17:36 +0100, Patrick Genovese wrote:
Talking of T/Cs I've been debating whether to wait for the 60 - 250 or
get the sigma 70-200 f/2.8 + 1.4x TC combo or possibly the 100-300 f/4
+ 1.4x TC
I know
1 - 100 of 300 matches
Mail list logo
