Dear list,
We have a bunch of SQL-queries, they should be executed in
a sequential order, with a defensive programming style in mind.
We were thinking to implement the solution as Stored Procedures
instead of a PHP solution that runs SQL queries, but an article in
Coding Horro recommendeds to
Am 17.02.13 17:00, schrieb AmirBehzad Eslami:
Dear list,
We have a bunch of SQL-queries, they should be executed in
a sequential order, with a defensive programming style in mind.
I don't understand what you want?
Queries are executed sequentially or do you plan to create a
multi-process PHP
Hi,
We were thinking to implement the solution as Stored Procedures
instead of a PHP solution that runs SQL queries, but an article in
Coding Horro recommendeds to avoid SP for good reasons:
The article shows only one thing. that common practice should be to 'do
everything where it belongs'
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, AmirBehzad Eslami
behzad.esl...@gmail.com wrote:
We have a bunch of SQL-queries, they should be executed in
a sequential order, with a defensive programming style in mind.
We were thinking to implement the solution as Stored Procedures
instead of a PHP
Hello,
I would like to ask you for help. This days I am trying to build one of my
applications. But I have problem which stopped me. I have folder whit php
files like connect.php, delete.php etc. These files contains classes named
the same as files. So in file connect.php is class Connect. These
I'm not sure I've understood you correctly, but you may try something
like the following primitive autoloader (I didn't debug it, it's just
an example):
class Base
{
protected $_path = '';
public function construct($base_path)
{
$this-_path = $base_path;
}
public
On 12/15/2011 01:05 PM, Alex Pojarsky wrote:
I'm not sure I've understood you correctly, but you may try something
like the following primitive autoloader (I didn't debug it, it's just
an example):
class Base
{
protected $_path = '';
public function construct($base_path)
{
Hi guys,
I try to applied your solutions but I have problems whit it. I need to
achieve this schema( - is something like ../ it means that it is one
level up folder):
connec.php(class Connect MySql)-
select.php(class Select MySql) -
-
Hello,
I would like to ask you for help. This days I am trying to build one of my
applications. But I have problem which stopped me. I have folder whit php
files like connect.php, delete.php etc. These files contains classes named
the same as files. So in file connect.php is class Connect. These
On 8 Dec 2011, at 17:14, Dominik Halvoník wrote:
I would like to ask you for help. This days I am trying to build one of my
applications. But I have problem which stopped me. I have folder whit php
files like connect.php, delete.php etc. These files contains classes named
the same as files.
Sent from a handheld device
On 08-Dec-2011, at 11:14 PM, Dominik Halvoník
dominik.halvo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ask you for help. This days I am trying to build one of my
applications. But I have problem which stopped me. I have folder whit php
files like connect.php,
Hello PHPers,
I have a collection of about 60 objects (class definitions). They are
all very similar. They all share a substantial % of the same core. But
they all have slight variations as well. The approach I took was to
make an abstract core class, and each of the 60 objects extends that
Set up autoloading:
http://php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.autoload.php
Cheers,
Rob.
Daniel Kolbo wrote:
Hello PHPers,
I have a collection of about 60 objects (class definitions). They are
all very similar. They all share a substantial % of the same core. But
they all have slight
On Sunday 20 December 2009 10:35:56 am Daniel Kolbo wrote:
Hello PHPers,
I have a collection of about 60 objects (class definitions). They are
all very similar. They all share a substantial % of the same core. But
they all have slight variations as well. The approach I took was to
make
On Sunday 20 December 2009 1:08:46 pm you wrote:
Maybe this would be the perfect opportunity for the php autoload
functions...?
Thanks for your help/thoughts/comments,
dK
`
Yep, this is a textbook case for a proper autoload setup. And no,
cramming all of the functionality into
Hello,
Is there an objected oriented programming software that can help me keep
track of my methods and properties of my objects. My memory is not what
it used to be, and i'd like to have a quick 'overview' or layout of all
the objects I have to work with. Maybe the software would even let make
19:46
To: PHP General
Subject: [PHP] OOP Design Software
Hello,
Is there an objected oriented programming software that can help me keep
track of my methods and properties of my objects. My memory is not what
it used to be, and i'd like to have a quick 'overview' or layout of all
the objects I
Message-
From: Daniel Kolbo [mailto:kolb0...@umn.edu]
Sent: 26 July 2009 19:46
To: PHP General
Subject: [PHP] OOP Design Software
Hello,
Is there an objected oriented programming software that can help me keep
track of my methods and properties of my objects. My memory is not what
...@umn.edu]
Sent: 26 July 2009 19:46
To: PHP General
Subject: [PHP] OOP Design Software
Hello,
Is there an objected oriented programming software that can help me keep
track of my methods and properties of my objects. My memory is not what
it used to be, and i'd like to have a quick
Update.
Hello Everyone,
First of all, thank you all for your input. I ran a sinmple test using the
suggestions you gave me and and require_once.
Using firebug to test the output, I got an internal server error. I found
out what the problem was.
What I am doing is I have classes which
Hi Everyone,
This is the first time that I am posting in the PHP forum, so hope that I am
osting in the right place.
I would like to say that before submitting to this forum I have done some
research looking for a solution without success.
I had been programming in ASP.NET for years using
Julian,
could you please show us an example of this problem?
--
João Cândido de Souza Neto
SIENS SOLUÇÕES EM GESTÃO DE NEGÓCIOS
Fone: (0XX41) 3033-3636 - JS
www.siens.com.br
Julian Muscat Doublesin opensourc...@gmail.com escreveu na mensagem
i never faced such a problem and i can assure you that it will never
happen. try...
main.php
?php
require('second.php');
?
second.php
test
call main.php via AJAX and see the responseText.
many things can go wrong in your coding. dont come to the conclusion
that this particular thing is not
Two things:
1. Try using the fully qualified path (ie /var/www/foo/bar.php instead of
foo/bar.php)
2. Look at setting up autoloading so you don't need to manually include
anyway. If you're going OOP, autoloading is a must!
On May 28, 2009 8:49am, kranthi kranthi...@gmail.com wrote:
i
2009/5/28 kranthi kranthi...@gmail.com
i recommend you firebug firefox adddon (just go to the net tab and you
can see all the details of the communication between client and
server)
and i find it helpful to use a standard javascript(jQuery in my case)
library instead of highly limited
Hi!
Do not use low-level AJAX.
There are many frameworks for ajax (JQUERY).
Try to use PHP frameworks like symfony, zend framework. They simplify your
work.
2009/5/28 Lenin le...@phpxperts.net
2009/5/28 kranthi kranthi...@gmail.com
i recommend you firebug firefox adddon (just go to the
2009/5/28 Olexandr Heneralov ohenera...@gmail.com
Hi!
Do not use low-level AJAX.
There are many frameworks for ajax (JQUERY).
Try to use PHP frameworks like symfony, zend framework. They simplify your
work.
2009/5/28 Lenin le...@phpxperts.net
2009/5/28 kranthi kranthi...@gmail.com
oorza...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:000e0cd6ad1a9f7d3d046af89...@google.com...
Two things:
1. Try using the fully qualified path (ie /var/www/foo/bar.php instead of
foo/bar.php)
2. Look at setting up autoloading so you don't need to manually include
anyway. If you're going OOP,
Eddie Drapkin oorza...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:68de37340905280737t3e1ad844y188ab8fa08f17...@mail.gmail.com...
Your code might not, but you sure do! Spending all that time writing
require statements = :(
If you are too lazy to write require statements then you are probably too
lazy to
There's a huge difference between laziness and opting in to use an
incredibly useful (and easy to properly deploy) feature to save myself time
so that I can spend more time writing that structured and efficient code of
which you speak. And the problem with what you're saying is that you still
Eddie Drapkin oorza...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:68de37340905280801m6964d355l2d6d8ef773f3b...@mail.gmail.com...
There's a huge difference between laziness and opting in to use an
incredibly useful (and easy to properly deploy) feature to save myself
time
so that I can spend more time
On 5/28/09 7:31 AM, Julian Muscat Doublesin opensourc...@gmail.com
wrote:
I had been programming in ASP.NET for years using Object Oriented
Princeliness but decided to walk away from that. I am now researching and
specialising in the open source world.
yay!
I have started to develop a
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 16:17 +0300, Olexandr Heneralov wrote:
Hi!
Do not use low-level AJAX.
There are many frameworks for ajax (JQUERY).
Try to use PHP frameworks like symfony, zend framework. They simplify your
work.
2009/5/28 Lenin le...@phpxperts.net
2009/5/28 kranthi
_hate_ java...
However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it because
of
the proliferation of web based applications. My personal opinion is
that's
where all programming is headed anyway, but that's just my opinion.
With that said, what's the differences and advantages
Java is really awesome at OOP and it is great for teaching OOP or,
shall we say illustrating OOP.
OOP is a programming technique in general without any bias towards any
programming language.
Good background on OOP concepts is essential in learning language
specific OOP implementation.
So don't
, and popular OOP language.
However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it because
of the proliferation of web based applications. My personal opinion is
that's where all programming is headed anyway, but that's just my opinion.
With that said, what's the differences
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:02:37AM -0500, tedd wrote:
As a side note, I think students should learn a language like C before
learning something like Perl, Python or PHP. Having to deal with
defining/declaring variables and their storage methods before use I
think makes
Marcus Gnaß schrieb:
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:02:37AM -0500, tedd wrote:
As a side note, I think students should learn a language like C before
learning something like Perl, Python or PHP. Having to deal with
defining/declaring variables and their storage methods before
Where I study, Intro to OOP is taught in C# using Visual Studio 2003 and
further OOP concepts are taught in Java, with the academic computer science
of OOP alongside.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Carlos Medina i...@simply-networks.dewrote:
Marcus Gnaß schrieb:
Paul M Foster wrote:
On
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Carlos Medina i...@simply-networks.de wrote:
Marcus Gnaß schrieb:
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:02:37AM -0500, tedd wrote:
As a side note, I think students should learn a language like C before
learning something like Perl, Python or PHP.
At 9:36 AM -0500 2/10/09, Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Carlos Medina
i...@simply-networks.de wrote:
Marcus Gnaß schrieb:
Hi @ all,
but this is a php list...
Regards
Carlos
Yes, it is, but the original question was about OOP and not
specifically about PHP.
A loosely typed language like PHP might not be the best choice for teaching
OOP, because even though PHP makes it easier with loose types, you should
know about them and how they are stored etc.
PHP is a great language but maybe not strict enough for students to
understand all the errors that can
to understand how they work -- thus I think
a specific language is required
I lean toward C++ because I wrote in it for a few years AND C++
appears to be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language.
However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it
because
know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it because of
the proliferation of web based applications. My personal opinion is that's
where all programming is headed anyway, but that's just my opinion.
With that said, what's the differences and advantages/disadvantages between
C++ and PHP OOP
to understand how they work -- thus I think a
specific language is required
I lean toward C++ because I wrote in it for a few years AND C++
appears to be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language.
However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it
because
don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it because
of the proliferation of web based applications. My personal opinion is
that's where all programming is headed anyway, but that's just my opinion.
With that said, what's the differences and advantages/disadvantages
between C++ and PHP OOP
, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it because
of the proliferation of web based applications. My personal opinion is
that's where all programming is headed anyway, but that's just my opinion.
With that said, what's the differences and advantages/disadvantages
between C++ and PHP
tedd wrote:
I lean toward C++ because I wrote in it for a few years AND C++
appears to be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language.
I would agree, although I suspect Java is also a good candidate.
However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it
because
tedd wrote:
I lean toward C++ because I wrote in it for a few years AND C++
appears to be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language.
I would agree, although I suspect Java is also a good candidate.
However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it
because
to see how concepts are
applied to understand how they work -- thus I think a specific language is
required
I lean toward C++ because I wrote in it for a few years AND C++ appears to
be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language.
However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open
OOP, I am open to considering it
because of the proliferation of web based applications. My personal
opinion is that's where all programming is headed anyway, but that's
just my opinion.
With that said, what's the differences and advantages/disadvantages
between C++ and PHP OOP?
I don't know
language.
However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it because of
the proliferation of web based applications. My personal opinion is that's
where all programming is headed anyway, but that's just my opinion.
With that said, what's the differences and advantages
Paul M Foster wrote:
PHP is *not* a good example for OO. There are a lot of OO principles
it doesn't follow.
I would have suggested Smalltalk, the original OO language, except
that no one uses it any more, and other languages don't necessarily
fully implement OO as done in Smalltalk.
lean toward C++ because I wrote in it for a few years AND C++ appears to
be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language.
Yes C++ is not bad for this, but it has also got some flaws.
However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it because of
the proliferation of web
are interesting, people need to see
how concepts are applied to understand how they work -- thus I think
a specific language is required
I lean toward C++ because I wrote in it for a few years AND C++
appears to be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language.
However, while I don't know PHP OOP
Hi,
How do I call methods from classes that are inherited? I want to add a
mysql_num_rows() function to a second class that is an addon to a MySQL
query in the first class. The first class will be used in several different
classes for different parts of the site so I don't want to directly add
Dear my friends,
This is the first time for me to use OOP concept of PHP. I wrote still a very
simple codes but it doesn't work as my manual book taught. the book titled
MySQL/PHP Database Application by Jay Greenspan say these lines should work
but in fact it don't work as expected.
Here is
what sort of error are you encountering ?
-nathan
On 8/15/07, Patrik Hasibuan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear my friends,
This is the first time for me to use OOP concept of PHP. I wrote still a
very simple codes but it doesn't work as my manual book taught. the book
titled MySQL/PHP
Theoritically if Class koneksi is being initialized than it
prints koneksi berhasil (connection succeeded) but it doesn't.
What does it? Just nothing? No warnings at all? Possibly disabled?
so far
rob
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
A few missing pieces in your code. Take a look below within your class. I
corrected it.
try also using include_once instead of require
and make sure that your error level and reporting are turned on so you can see
what is happening.
Patrik Hasibuan wrote:
Dear my friends,
This is the
Dear Jim,
You've solved my problem, Jim. Thank you very much.
Now, my code give the output as my expectation:
superclass koneksi dipanggil
koneksi berhasil
negara-
.
But come another problem, namely: the $negara is empty. I tried to read the
documentation on
Patrik Hasibuan wrote:
Dear Jim,
You've solved my problem, Jim. Thank you very much.
Now, my code give the output as my expectation:
superclass koneksi dipanggil
koneksi berhasil
negara-
.
But come another problem, namely: the $negara is empty. I tried to read the documentation on
Dear Jim,
thanks for your help. I've modified my codes as you adviced.
But than the output is:
superclass koneksi dipanggil
koneksi berhasil
No results found
The column 'country' of table 'countries' already really contents complete all
contry name from all over the earth. How come the query
Patrik Hasibuan wrote:
Dear Jim,
thanks for your help. I've modified my codes as you adviced.
But than the output is:
superclass koneksi dipanggil
koneksi berhasil
No results found
The column 'country' of table 'countries' already really contents complete all contry name from all over the
Jim Lucas wrote:
Patrik Hasibuan wrote:
Dear Jim,
thanks for your help. I've modified my codes as you adviced.
But than the output is:
superclass koneksi dipanggil
koneksi berhasil
No results found
The column 'country' of table 'countries' already really contents
complete all contry name
Dear my friend, Jim Lucas.
Thank you very much for your help. You've solved my problem one more time.
I really appreciate your help.
===
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:17:02 -0700
Jim Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Lucas wrote:
Patrik Hasibuan wrote:
Dear Jim,
thanks for your help. I've
Stut wrote:
This is a question of design, not a question of whether to use OOP.
For example, in several of the sites I maintain I have classes that
inherit from a base class called Table. The base class provides a lot
of the basic methods for working on a table (think ActiveRecord). It
also
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-10-15 13:59:39 -0700:
As I cannot think of a class-based way to build my report, I think
I'll use a customer class everywhere BUT in the report. Inside the
report I'll just use one SQL statement instead of dozens
of instances and hundreds of queries.
I'll make a
As I cannot think of a class-based way to build my report, I think I'll use a
customer class
everywhere BUT in the report. Inside the report I'll just use one SQL
statement instead of dozens
of instances and hundreds of queries.
I'll make a note inside the class that this and that method is
Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tony Marston wrote:
Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My general approach to designing a system is data-centric. I tend to
start by defining the database schema since getting that clear in my
Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ed Lazor wrote:
On Oct 12, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Stut wrote:
If I then go on to create an admin interface for the users, I would
create another completely separate class called UserCollection to handle
more than one user. I may at
Ed Lazor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:35 AM, Tony Marston wrote:
What a coincidence! That's exactly my approach, but I've taken it one
step
further. I always start with a properly normalised database which I can
then
import into my
Ed Lazor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:54 AM, Stut wrote:
Youch!! Your implementation seems to be focused on development
efficiency rather than runtime efficience. In all but rare research
projects this is backwards for a web-based system.
Please include the list when replying to that others may benefit (or
suffer) from the discussion.
Bruce Cowin wrote:
I like your static user class. Does the user instance then get saved to a
session variable that is serialized/unserialized on every page?
There is no user instance as
to PHP... OOP is a stable, mature methodology.
However, OOP in PHP is fairly new (if you ignore PHP4's pitiful
efforts) and there's still a lot of unease about this new kid on the
block, along with a lot of hype around the idea that it will launch
PHP into being a real programming language instead
On 10/13/06, Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ed Lazor wrote:
...Or is it something else entirely; I dunno, maybe
UserCollection has a property defined as an array of User class? I
think that's what people were saying earlier in the thread as being a
very bad thing in terms of memory
On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:35 AM, Tony Marston wrote:
What a coincidence! That's exactly my approach, but I've taken it
one step
further. I always start with a properly normalised database which I
can then
import into my daa dictionary application. From there I can press a
button
and create a
On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:54 AM, Stut wrote:
Youch!! Your implementation seems to be focused on development
efficiency rather than runtime efficience. In all but rare research
projects this is backwards for a web-based system. This is exactly
the practice I am trying to discourage. It's a
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-10-12 06:49:22 +0100:
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-10-11 21:28:36 +0100:
Richard Lynch wrote:
This is a classic example of the obvious OOP solution being wildly
inappropriate.
Ok, so I now find myself in the unusual position of disagreeing with
Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-10-11 21:28:36 +0100:
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, October 10, 2006 6:14 pm, Chris de Vidal wrote:
I want to create a customer class which fetches its attributes from
a MySQL database.
No,
By the way, about myself. I'm primarily a system administrator. Most of the
time I USE code, NOT
write it. But I also dabble, and right now we need to improve our old custom
PHP revenue
application which has sat stagnant for a few years. We can't afford a
full-time programmer and I
know
On Wed, October 11, 2006 3:28 pm, Stut wrote:
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, October 10, 2006 6:14 pm, Chris de Vidal wrote:
I want to create a customer class which fetches its attributes
from
a MySQL database.
No, you don't. :-)
This is a classic example of the obvious OOP solution being
On Thu, October 12, 2006 12:49 am, Stut wrote:
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-10-11 21:28:36 +0100:
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, October 10, 2006 6:14 pm, Chris de Vidal wrote:
I want to create a customer class which fetches its attributes
from
a MySQL database.
No, you
On Thu, October 12, 2006 3:11 am, Tony Marston wrote:
I have to disagree as well. There is absolutely nothing wrong which
the
approach of creating one class for each table in the database. It
cannot be
wrong for the simple reason THAT IT WORKS!
Only problem is that then you often end up
On Thu, October 12, 2006 8:24 am, Chris de Vidal wrote:
[use the archives]
I can't architect a good OOP solution to a problem that hasn't been
fully defined, any more than one can architect a house without knowing
all the rooms that are needed...
I agree that all the code samples you provided
On Oct 12, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Richard Lynch wrote:
I can't architect a good OOP solution to a problem that hasn't been
fully defined, any more than one can architect a house without knowing
all the rooms that are needed...
Sorry to jump into the middle of the conversation, but I thought this
Richard Lynch wrote:
I *still* don't see OOP as a Right Answer for spitting out HTML web
pages in optimized minimalist time frames...
Maybe my brain just got warped by all that AI/Lisp work I did for a
couple decades, but it feels to me like a bad selection of weapons for
the task at hand, most
Ed Lazor wrote:
On Oct 12, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Richard Lynch wrote:
I can't architect a good OOP solution to a problem that hasn't been
fully defined, any more than one can architect a house without knowing
all the rooms that are needed...
Sorry to jump into the middle of the conversation,
On Thu, October 12, 2006 1:03 pm, Ed Lazor wrote:
On Oct 12, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Richard Lynch wrote:
I can't architect a good OOP solution to a problem that hasn't been
fully defined, any more than one can architect a house without
knowing
all the rooms that are needed...
Sorry to jump into
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-10-12 16:29:09 -0500:
On Thu, October 12, 2006 1:03 pm, Ed Lazor wrote:
On Oct 12, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Richard Lynch wrote:
I can't architect a good OOP solution to a problem that hasn't been
fully defined, any more than one can architect a house without
knowing
Comments / Questions below.
On Oct 12, 2006, at 12:15 PM, Stut wrote:
Except that is the attitude that leads to painful OOP in PHP. PHP
is not the same environment as C++.
The environment (classes, objects, etc) needs to be created and
destroyed with each request.
I definitely agree that
Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, October 12, 2006 3:11 am, Tony Marston wrote:
I have to disagree as well. There is absolutely nothing wrong which
the
approach of creating one class for each table in the database. It
cannot be
wrong for the
if it's going
to be popular, even if it's short-lived.
To relate that twoddle to PHP... OOP is a stable, mature methodology.
However, OOP in PHP is fairly new (if you ignore PHP4's pitiful efforts)
and there's still a lot of unease about this new kid on the block, along
with a lot of hype
is the next stage of audio and video entertainment in
the same way that colour TV was all those years ago.
*cough* AskNinja.com RULES! hehe *cough*
To relate that twoddle to PHP... OOP is a stable, mature
methodology. However, OOP in PHP is fairly new (if you ignore
PHP4's pitiful efforts
--- Johan Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should look into getting Professional PHP5 by Lecky-Thompson,
Eide-Goodman, Nowicki and Cove from WROX.
...
The collection class in chapter 5 discusses a programming problem
just like yours.
I will look into that, thank you.
CD
Think
--- Larry Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For your rudimentary example of object-relational mapping below, yes,
performance is going to be atrocious. That's because you're not taking any
advantage of the features that using OOP gives you.
Well, I /thought/ I was taking advantage of black
- Original Message -
From: Chris de Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] OOP slow -- am I an idiot?
--- Johan Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should look into getting Professional PHP5 by Lecky
On Tue, October 10, 2006 6:14 pm, Chris de Vidal wrote:
I want to create a customer class which fetches its attributes from
a MySQL database.
No, you don't. :-)
This is a classic example of the obvious OOP solution being wildly
inappropriate.
The sad thing is, there are a zillion applications
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, October 10, 2006 6:14 pm, Chris de Vidal wrote:
I want to create a customer class which fetches its attributes from
a MySQL database.
No, you don't. :-)
This is a classic example of the obvious OOP solution being wildly
inappropriate.
Ok, so I now find myself
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-10-11 21:28:36 +0100:
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, October 10, 2006 6:14 pm, Chris de Vidal wrote:
I want to create a customer class which fetches its attributes from
a MySQL database.
No, you don't. :-)
This is a classic example of the obvious OOP solution
1 - 100 of 320 matches
Mail list logo
