On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:17:33PM +0200, Maciek Sokolewicz wrote:
Please please please please don't do this!
1) You did not answer the question, nor giving any related information.
2) This was debug-output. I see not point in optimizing.
3) print is language construct, just as is echo
4)
Maciek Sokolewicz maciek.sokolew...@gmail.com wrote:
Please please please please don't do this!
Please Please Please Do Not Hijack Threads.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 25 June 2013 10:02, Tamara Temple tamouse.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Maciek Sokolewicz maciek.sokolew...@gmail.com wrote:
Please please please please don't do this!
Please Please Please Do Not Hijack Threads.
Hijacking would be starting a completely different discussion in the same
thread.
On 24 Jun 2013, at 13:02, Karl-Arne Gjersøyen karlar...@gmail.com wrote:
Error in my last post This is corrected:
$item_amount_in_store = 223;
$update_amount = 7;
$item_amount_in_Store += $update_amount;
It show the result = 227 and not 230. Why is this happen?
Something else is going
You should give a complete programm so we can run exactly
the same you do, like this:
?php
$item_amount_in_store = 223;
print ($item_amount_in_store);
$update_amount = 7;
$item_amount_in_store += $update_amount;
print ( + $update_amount = $item_amount_in_store );
?
which gives this result:
variables are case-sensitive.
$item_amount_in_store is different from
$item_amount_in_Store
1st variable contains all lowercase characters, while the 2nd one contains
S uppercase character.
happy coding
sachin
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Karl-Arne Gjersøyen karlar...@gmail.comwrote:
On 24-6-2013 14:27, n...@nobswolf.info wrote:
You should give a complete programm so we can run exactly
the same you do, like this:
?php
$item_amount_in_store = 223;
print ($item_amount_in_store);
Please please please please don't do this!
First of all, I don't know why you would use the
Amen!
Am 24.06.2013 18:17, schrieb Maciek Sokolewicz:
On 24-6-2013 14:27, n...@nobswolf.info wrote:
You should give a complete programm so we can run exactly
the same you do, like this:
?php
$item_amount_in_store = 223;
print ($item_amount_in_store);
Please please please please
Am 24.06.2013 18:17, schrieb Maciek Sokolewicz:
On 24-6-2013 14:27, n...@nobswolf.info wrote:
You should give a complete programm so we can run exactly
the same you do, like this:
?php
$item_amount_in_store = 223;
print ($item_amount_in_store);
Please please please please don't do this!
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 07:50:45 +0700, Daniel Brown paras...@gmail.com
wrote:
No offense, but are you kidding me? The host disables phpinfo() for
security reasons, but keeps 4.4.4 running? Talk about running, Paul
run
away from them. Fast.
AND they have a condition (this reported)
On Feb 16, 2011 7:07 PM, Paul S pau...@roadrunner.com wrote:
Can anyone please tell me how the addslashes output (note = Everyone''s a
card on the \earth) in the following example is possible. It is
addslashes output but this result is consistent with the output from
post when runtime is set:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Matt Palermo palermom...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming there is no way to make a global alias. Can anyone
confirm/deny this?
I reread the documentation on namespaces, and from what I can tell this is
no way to do it. Each file maintains its own active
2009/10/28 tedd t...@sperling.com:
Hi gang:
http://php.net/manual/en/security.globals.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I don't do this personally, but you can probably get your script
working by doing something like this:
foreach( $_GET as $k = $v ) $$k = $v;
You would put that at the top of your page, but be aware that it
allows other people to set variables on your page (just like register
globals does).
If
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:27 PM, tedd t...@sperling.com wrote:
Hi gang:
I am reviewing some old code (circa 2003) where the programmer had one
script call another and placed variable values in the URL, like so:
a href=user_edit.php?user_id=5223action=edit
That seems innocent enough.
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 13:47 -0400, Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:27 PM, tedd t...@sperling.com wrote:
Hi gang:
I am reviewing some old code (circa 2003) where the programmer had one
script call another and placed variable values in the URL, like so:
a
To all:
I found the problem, which basically was that I had declared a
variable in a preceding script with the same name, namely $user_id.
When I changed my script to $u_id, everything worked as before.
Clearly, Globals are evil.
It's a bitch to have to work with code you can't change
From: tedd
I found the problem, which basically was that I had declared a
variable in a preceding script with the same name, namely $user_id.
When I changed my script to $u_id, everything worked as before.
Clearly, Globals are evil.
It's a bitch to have to work with code you can't
Bob McConnell wrote:
From: tedd
I found the problem, which basically was that I had declared a
variable in a preceding script with the same name, namely $user_id.
When I changed my script to $u_id, everything worked as before.
Clearly, Globals are evil.
It's a bitch to have to work with
At 2:48 PM -0400 10/28/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
Bob McConnell wrote:
From: tedd
I found the problem, which basically was that I had declared a
variable in a preceding script with the same name, namely $user_id.
When I changed my script to $u_id, everything worked as before.
Clearly,
tedd wrote:
At 2:48 PM -0400 10/28/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
Bob McConnell wrote:
From: tedd
I found the problem, which basically was that I had declared a
variable in a preceding script with the same name, namely $user_id.
When I changed my script to $u_id, everything worked as before.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:17 PM, James McLean james.mcl...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Nathan Nobbequickshif...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:56 PM, James McLean james.mcl...@gmail.com
wrote:
did you take a look at the size of the cache you created ?
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:17 AM, Nathan Nobbequickshif...@gmail.com wrote:
hmm, 2 other thoughts i have..
. long shot, but do you have apc.php installed on a diff domain than the
moodle app (not sure but i suspect apc.php only shows cached values for the
domain in which its currently running
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:56 PM, James McLean james.mcl...@gmail.comwrote:
(Resend from around 1 week ago, because of no responses)
Hi All,
Over the weekend I setup a test of APC intending to benchmark a Moodle
installation with various APC settings to see how well I could get it
to
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Nathan Nobbequickshif...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:56 PM, James McLean james.mcl...@gmail.com
wrote:
did you take a look at the size of the cache you created ?
Yes. Tried multiple segments and single, with cache size values
between 128mb and
Can you do a phpinfo(); and tell us the value of the setting
apc.filters (or every apc.* if you can)? Just curious, but I've seen
apps set that setting to avoid APC opcode caching.
Jonathan
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:56 PM, James McLeanjames.mcl...@gmail.com wrote:
(Resend from around 1 week
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Jonathan Tapicertapi...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you do a phpinfo(); and tell us the value of the setting
apc.filters (or every apc.* if you can)? Just curious, but I've seen
apps set that setting to avoid APC opcode caching.
Certainly, however it will have to
(Re-sending as I accidentally sent my original post directly to Al)
Al wrote:
Mace Eliason wrote:
I really don't think this is possible from what I know of php, but I
thought I would as the experts.
Is it possible to have php create directories and move files on a
local machine. I have
PHP can do this, but you'd need it set up on each of the client
computers and periodically run to check the temp folder and perform the
upload. That's what any other application that can do similar does.
Cheers,
Rob.
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 15:30, João Cândido de Souza Neto wrote:
PHP don't do
Ok, but you're telling that the client will be doing upload to server. Not
the server doing a dounload from client. I was understood as a wrong way.
I'm sorry.
Robert Cummings wrote:
PHP can do this, but you'd need it set up on each of the client
computers and periodically run to check the
Yeah, you can't do the local computer file moving and all that with the same
script as your server side component, but if you'd rather not learn C# or
another language like that, but you're comfortable with PHP, I'd highly
recommend checking out Winbinder (http://www.winbinder.com). Assuming
Tony Di Croce wrote:
Is it even possible to connect to a postgres server (thats running on
linux) from a windows CLI php script?
I'm seeing a pg_connect() error... FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for
host 192.168.1.100
Any ideas?
The easiest way to get PG up and running on a Windows system is cygwin.
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:28:09 -0500, Jason Barnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Di Croce wrote:
Is it even possible to connect to a postgres server (thats running on
linux) from a windows CLI php script?
Yup.
I'm seeing a pg_connect() error... FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for
host
-Original Message-
From: Tony Di Croce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 January 2005 23:21
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Is this even possible?
Is it even possible to connect to a postgres server (thats running on
linux) from a windows CLI php script?
I'm seeing a
On Sunday 23 January 2005 07:20, Tony Di Croce wrote:
Is it even possible to connect to a postgres server (thats running on
linux) from a windows CLI php script?
Yes.
I'm seeing a pg_connect() error... FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for
host 192.168.1.100
Exactly. So put the appropriate entry
I have used Turck MMCache in the past to store results in shared memory
with an specific TTL. Also you could use Cache_Lite in PEAR.
Hope it helps,
Adrian Madrid
Jed R. Brubaker wrote:
I am thinking like JavaBeans. Here is what I have going on:
I have a series of rather database intensive
Alawi Albaity wrote:
I want to create and defined variables of an object in runtime , is
that possible ?
I can do that with arrays but I want the access it as variable from
obbject it self and not like member of an array are defined on object
before I load it !
What about trying it before asking?
[snip]
I am working on securing an application that uses CDSSO (Cross Domain
Single Sign On).
I am trying to reproduce the CSRF (Cross Site Request Forgery) attack
(using img/ TAG) in I.E. 6.01, but am unable to do so. However the
attack works on Mozilla and other older browsers.
My
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] CSRF attack not possible in I.E. 6.01 SP1?
[snip]
I am working on securing an application that uses CDSSO (Cross Domain
Single Sign On).
I am trying to reproduce the CSRF
[snip]
Perhaps the question could be asked another way and be more on topic.
Is there a fix in I.E. 6.01 that would interfere with PHP being able to
generate different mime types on the fly, like .png or .jpg
[/snip]
a. But that wasn't what he asked.
2. Top-posting === bad
--
PHP General
--- Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You would have to ask the Microsoft Development Group, who
probably does not subscribe to this list. Crossposting is bad.
Being OT during a crosspost is even worse. I can hear the
falmethrowers warming up in the wings.
FYI - This is (or use to be)
Jay Blanchard wrote:
FYI - This is (or use to be) a PHP list
If I have a web server running php, how do I change the oil in my car?
--
John C. Nichel
ÜberGeek
KegWorks.com
716.856.9675
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question: Is I.E. 6.01 SP1 doing something to foil the CSRF
attack, i.e. only allow image extensions .gif .png .jpeg?
This seems highly unlikely. Can you show us the code you're using to test?
Chris
=
Chris Shiflett - http://shiflett.org/
PHP Security
--- Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Perhaps the question could be asked another way and be more on
topic.
Is there a fix in I.E. 6.01 that would interfere with PHP being
able to generate different mime types on the fly, like .png or
.jpg
[/snip]
a. But that wasn't
]
To
Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
RE: [PHP] CSRF attack not possible in I.E. 6.01 SP1?
--- Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You would have to ask the Microsoft Development Group, who
probably does not subscribe
[snip]
Yup I think my posting is very on-topic. The application that
I am working on is written in PHP.
[/snip]
Thanks for stating that in your original post.
downloads.seagate.com
Chris Shiflett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No Phone Info Available
08/16/2004 11:24 AM
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: [PHP] CSRF attack not possible in I.E. 6.01 SP1?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I m sure all PHP developers check their applications for
CSRF vulnerability, in various browsers (including I.E. ).
I speak about CSRF in many of the talks I give, and I think you'd be
surprised by how many people haven't even heard of it.
As a PHP/Java
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't share the exact code ;) , but here is something very
similar:
img src=http://slashdot.org/my/logout; height=1 width=1
If I load a web page with the above code, it should log me out
of slashdot. It works in Mozilla (and netscape), but not in I.E.
6.01
-Original Message-
Jay Blanchard wrote:
FYI - This is (or use to be) a PHP list
If I have a web server running php, how do I change the oil in my car?
Have you tried the OilChange class from PHPClasses.org? ;)
-Ed
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe,
What if you add a random seed to the URL?
img src=http://slashdot.org/my/logout?fluff=?php echo rand(1,200);?
height=1 width=1
-Original Message-
Hello Chris,
I can't share the exact code ;) , but here is something very similar:
img src=http://slashdot.org/my/logout; height=1
-Original Message-
The best information would be if you can capture the exact HTTP
transactions involved. For example, using something like ethereal, capture
the request and response for Mozilla, and then do the same for IE 6.01
SP1.
Short of that, you could create a URL
--- Ed Lazor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't it work to just make the script spit out a mime type
header and a small (1x1) image when it's done to satisfy the
browser's mime type requirements?
Definitely, but most CSRF attacks are meant to spoof a request from the
legitimate user to some Web
-Original Message-
Definitely, but most CSRF attacks are meant to spoof a request from the
legitimate user to some Web site where he/she already has privilege. Thus,
the receiving site is usually as much the victim as the user.
I'm not sure if that makes any sense... :-)
It does =)
16, 2004 9:52 PM
Subject: RE: [PHP] CSRF attack not possible in I.E. 6.01 SP1?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I m sure all PHP developers check their applications for
CSRF vulnerability, in various browsers (including I.E. ).
I speak about CSRF in many of the talks I give, and I think
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: [PHP] CSRF attack not possible in I.E. 6.01 SP1?
Why is so important if Internet Explorer allows URLS of images where the
file name is only .jpg, .png, or .gif?
A url can be something like:
http://www.site.com/script.php/image.jpg?logout=true
Internet
]
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: [PHP] CSRF attack not possible in I.E. 6.01 SP1?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't share the exact code ;) , but here is something very
similar:
img src=http://slashdot.org/my/logout; height=1
--- Octavian Rasnita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is so important if Internet Explorer allows URLS of images
where the file name is only .jpg, .png, or .gif?
A url can be something like:
http://www.site.com/script.php/image.jpg?logout=true
This is definitely true, but as I mentionde in a
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upon your suggestion, I used a sniffer to sniff traffic for
the web app that I am working on.
To my surprise, the data captured during the sniff for both
browsers was exactly the same.
Can you elaborate or post the exact requests sent from each browser? I'm
: [PHP] CSRF attack not possible in I.E. 6.01 SP1?
* Thus wrote [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello Chris,
I can't share the exact code ;) , but here is something very similar:
img src=http://slashdot.org/my/logout; height=1 width=1
If I load a web page with the above code, it should log me out
* Thus wrote [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello Chris,
I can't share the exact code ;) , but here is something very similar:
img src=http://slashdot.org/my/logout; height=1 width=1
If I load a web page with the above code, it should log me out of
slashdot. It works in Mozilla (and netscape), but
-Original Message-
So now I am completely clueless as to why this particular attacks works in
Mozilla but not in IE.
Could you describe the problem again and give full detail? I think we need
to better model the problem in order to present a more effective solution.
The link below
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No Phone Info Available
08/16/2004 02:26 PM
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
RE: [PHP] CSRF attack not possible in I.E. 6.01 SP1?
-Original Message-
So now I am completely clueless as to why this particular attacks works
in
Mozilla but not in IE.
Could you describe
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Curt,
Yes, the /. system depends on cookies to keep the user logged
in.
However a CSRF attack is NOT trying to access a third party
cookie.
The web browser make the same GET request whether it is using
img/ TAG or the user clicking on a link. So in
--- Curt Zirzow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure how the /. logout system works, but my guess is
that they rely on cookies to do this. Since that is a different
site than from the originating file, those cookies would be
considered third party. I know in IE you can disable third
party
--- Ed Lazor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The link below goes to a page I found that describes CSRF a
little differently than what Chris was presenting - to give a
different perspective on things.
http://www.squarefree.com/securitytips/web-developers.html
It doesn't seem to be different,
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To give some details:
I am unable to re-produce a CSRF attack when the victim is
using a I.E. 6.01 SP1 (all patches applied). However the
attack works in Mozilla and other older browsers.
I can't give you the exact code for attack (for security
reasons), but
I was able to confirm / reproduce what you're experiencing. I was also able
to confirm that toggling IE 6's acceptance of 3rd party cookies changes the
behavior.
Create an HTML on your local machine with the following line:
img src=http://www.atfantasy.com/test/image_status.php;
It'll load an
-Original Message-
However a CSRF attack is NOT trying to access a third party cookie.
The web browser make the same GET request whether it is using img/ TAG
or the user clicking on a link. So in either case the cookies are in the
context of the website to which the cookies belong.
/2004 04:57 PM
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
RE: [PHP] CSRF attack not possible in I.E. 6.01 SP1?
-Original Message-
However a CSRF attack is NOT trying to access a third party cookie.
The web browser make the same GET request whether
dont know what his deal is but ok will close this idea now i guess..
- Original Message -
From: Miles Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andy B [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] page design and possible conflict??
You're right, ot out of range
ok
Am Donnerstag, 8. April 2004 14:45 schrieb Andy B:
dont know what his deal is but ok will close this idea now i guess..
- Original Message -
From: Miles Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andy B [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] page design
Rather than doing something soley to comply with a standard you must sell
your client on the idea or not do it, they are the ones that ultimately must
live with the decision and be happy with it. As a programmer it is your job
to make sure they have all the information and the pro's and cons of
The work-around is to create the directory outside of your web application
from your regular account. Or if you are allowed to run cgi scripts and
these are set up via cgiwrapper or suExec to run as your own user id, use
this to create the directory. Once created with the right owner, you can
On Saturday 28 February 2004 22:47, raisinlove wrote:
Hi, I'm having trouble understanding why I can create and delete
directories with my script via mkdir and rmdir, but not simply being
able to read them with opendir or readdir?
Are you saying that you can create a directory using mkdir()
This is normal. You are allowed to create the directory because the
directory you are creating it in is owned by the same user id that owns
the script calling mkdir(). However, since your web server runs as some
other user the owner of the newly created dir will be that user and not
your own so
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
This is normal. You are allowed to create the directory because the
directory you are creating it in is owned by the same user id that owns
the script calling mkdir(). However, since your web server runs as some
other user the owner of the newly created dir will be that
Surely if there is a work-around then safe mode would not be doing its job
properly?
Well this was part of the purpose of my post, before Rasmus explained
it, I didn't understand why I couldnt access a directory I had created.
I was hoping for a function which would achieve the same purpose but
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, raisinlove wrote:
Surely if there is a work-around then safe mode would not be doing its job
properly?
Well this was part of the purpose of my post, before Rasmus explained
it, I didn't understand why I couldnt access a directory I had created.
I was hoping for a
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 12:36:49PM +0200, Tit Black Petric wrote:
:
: Not really what i was getting at dude, i dont see how defining a class
: variable will let me define a method outside of a given class, or to
: dynamically extend/implement other classes inside a general one?
Why the desire to
-Original Message-
From: [-^-!-%- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 July 2003 05:46
I came across the following inconsistency between PHP 4 and
PHP 5 Build
2195(Jul 24 2003 20:10:21). The error makes sense. I am just curious
about the version inconsistency. Is this due to a
ASP merely outputs HTML. His table is basic HTML dynamically rendered
perhaps by an ASP component. This is also trivial to do in PHP.
Cheers,
Rob.
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 18:38, Ryan A wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to get my data into a very similar layout as this:
* Thus wrote Ryan A ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi,
I am trying to get my data into a very similar layout as this:
http://hostfilter.com/ComparePlan.asp?IntVal1=389IntVal2=546IntVal3=605
see the table with the plans...how is he getting that in one table? what
kind of logic is that? the best I can do
Hi,
Thanks for replying.
You say: Nothing special html wise.
then can you tell me how its done?
The content is dynamic being pulled from the database..how do i get it in
one table in that layout?
There are different ways you can do this it could help to know what
kind of data structure you
* Thus wrote Ryan A ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi,
Thanks for replying.
You say: Nothing special html wise.
then can you tell me how its done?
The content is dynamic being pulled from the database..how do i get it in
one table in that layout?
There are different ways you can do this it
You say: Nothing special html wise.
then can you tell me how its done?
there's some nice simple CSS behind it to give the nice border and colour
changes, but yes, nothing special HTML wise. it's a simple table
The content is dynamic being pulled from the database..how do i get it in
one
Hi,
Thanks for replying.
no probs...
I have not worked with arrays much other than simple arrays like the $_get
or $_post and the database ones...can you give me a another emample on how
to do this please?
like how to put my db into an array and then call each part
sorry, i'm
Hey,
Thanks again.
It should take me around an hour or two just to figure out what you
wrote...:-D
I guess i have to hit the manual quite a bit.
Thanks,
-Ryan
Hi,
Thanks for replying.
no probs...
I have not worked with arrays much other than simple arrays like the
$_get
or $_post
* Thus wrote Ryan A ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi,
Thanks for replying.
You say: Nothing special html wise.
then can you tell me how its done?
The basic logic is like this:
table
foreach option_of_hosting_service
tr
tdname_of_service/td
foreach hosting_company_service
OK.
I would probably still go with a counting approach.
abc can be represented as 012, so, for all 4-character permutations of abc,
you could count in base 3 from 0 to (base 3), and then do zero padding
and string substitutions to output as -
The only problems I can think of:
just count from 0 to FF in HEX
or count from 0 to 16777216 and print each output in HEX
I'm sure there's a function for outputting a number in hex.
of course, displaying 16million numbers to the browser will be time
consuming, to say the least. :P
Barry
At 03:59 PM 4/3/2003, you wrote:
Hi
I'm sure there's a function for outputting a number in hex.
$number = 1234;
Printf(Hexadecimal number: 0x%X, $number);
Output:
Hexadecimal number: 0x4D2
John
-~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~-
John Coggeshall
john at coggeshall dot org
Hi guys,
I appreciate your taking interest, but as I wrote, I am looking for a
permutation algorithm, not specifically for all the hex colors. That
was simply an example of a usage.
Put another way, I want a function that I can do:
echo generatePerms(abc,4);
and it will return
aaab
Try this (minimal testing, un-optimized):
function permutations($letters,$num){
$last = str_repeat($letters{0},$num);
$result = array();
while($last != str_repeat(lastchar($letters),$num)){
$result[] = $last;
$last = char_add($letters,$last,$num-1);
}
$result[] =
beautiful! This seems to do the trick. Thanks very much!
-michael
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 07:45 PM, Leif K-Brooks wrote:
Try this (minimal testing, un-optimized):
function permutations($letters,$num){
$last = str_repeat($letters{0},$num);
$result = array();
while($last !=
completely (which means you don't have to worry
about people disabling javascript).
-Mark
- Original message -
From: Jeff Bluemel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:24:52 -0700
Subject: Re: [PHP] is this not possible?
here's the URL if case somebody decides
That, or an iframe. You can't pass variables on the same request, though.
Jeff Bluemel wrote:
I'm been ignored on this question for 4-5 days now. even if it is not
possible could somebody please verify this?
is it possible to pass a variable from javascript directly to php WITHOUT
using
No...
Javascript need to send that data back to the server and how are you
going to do that?
You will have to use a form or a link or some method to send it to the
server.
Now you can use php to write your javascript code that can be used to
link to a php file that can be run on the client side
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Bluemel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:39 AM
Subject: [PHP] is this not possible?
I'm been ignored on this question for 4-5 days now. even if it is not
possible could somebody please verify this?
is it
At 22:39 18.11.2002, Jeff Bluemel spoke out and said:
[snip]
I'm been ignored on this question for 4-5 days now. even if it is not
possible could somebody please verify this?
is it possible to pass a variable from javascript directly to php WITHOUT
using
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
