On ബുധന് 17 ജനുവരി 2018 03:59 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> My understanding is that it is stuck in contrib because it needs itself to
> build.
> It currently downloads itself with npm in the build process.
I have uploaded it to main now as all its dependencies are in main now.
New rollup version
On ബുധന് 17 ജനുവരി 2018 03:59 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> we are now stuck at multiple location because rollup is in contrib.
>
> My understanding is that it is stuck in contrib because it needs itself to
> build.
> It currently downloads itself with npm in the build process.
ther
Control: tag -1 help
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:38:58 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> I'd like to upload chai 4.1.2 to unstable soon, please fix the test failure.
v8flags 3.0.1 support chai 4, but now 3 tests fail. Changes pushed to
alioth.
mkdir -p test-home
HOME=/<>/test-home mocha -
On ബുധന് 17 ജനുവരി 2018 07:15 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> But back to our issue, I follow you on 887500, but I am unsure whether 887497
> really blocks 886404 ?
>
> I mean, only one of the 4 Critical dependency warnings seems related to
> /usr/lib/nodejs/base/utils.js (node-base)
Well, it is n
Package: node-snapdragon
version: 0.8.1-1
severity: important
Control: block 887497 by -1
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/micromatch/braces/issues/13
node-base 1.0.1 is requried for building node-rollup-plugin-babel, but
it will break snapdragon 0.8
snapdragon 0.11 does not depend on nod
Package: node-base
version: 0.11.1-1
severity: important
Control: block 886404 by -1
Webpack gives the following error when building node-rollup-plugin-babel
WARNING in /usr/lib/nodejs/base/utils.js
3:34-41 Critical dependency: require function is used in a way in which
dependencies cannot be sta
On 2018, ജനുവരി 17 4:54:11 PM IST, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
>These warnings are gone with latest versions of base but it will break
>snapdragon. New version of snapdragon does not depend on base, but it
>will break braces. But braces upstream is not interested to update to
>newer sna
On 2018, ജനുവരി 17 3:59:06 PM IST, Paolo Greppi wrote:
>Hi team,
>
>we are now stuck at multiple location because rollup is in contrib.
>
>My understanding is that it is stuck in contrib because it needs itself
>to build.
>It currently downloads itself with npm in the build process.
I think we
On 2018, ജനുവരി 17 3:35:44 PM IST, Paolo Greppi wrote:
>First the good news: I dont' get the build error on sid today. Maybe
>that problem has solved by itself ;-)
I think the build error was fixed by adding external-helpers plugin.
>But the autopkgtest fails with the babelHelpers missing erro
On ചൊവ്വ 16 ജനുവരി 2018 11:54 രാവിലെ, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> 287 passing (1s)
> 15 failing
6 test failures are caused by a newer version of css-tree.
https://github.com/svg/svgo/issues/894
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing li
Control: tag -1 help
code is pushed to https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-svgo
some dependencies are still in NEW which I have added to
https://people.debian.org/~praveen/babel/
287 passing (1s)
15 failing
1) plugins tests
convertStyleToAttrs.02:
Error: Unknown node type: und
package: node-node-uuid
version: 1.4.7-1
severity: grave
it also breaks packages that depend on it like npm.
node -e "require('node-uuid');"
module.js:538
throw err;
^
Error: Cannot find module 'node-uuid'
at Function.Module._resolveFilename (module.js:536:15)
at Function.Module
On 01/09/2018 05:05 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Hi, I have prepared the update to node-ms 2.1.1
>
> Please someone allow me DM upload access for this package or sponsor the
> upload:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-ms.git
>
> Paolo
>
Granted DM access for both.
signature
On 01/09/2018 05:23 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Hi, the package node-node-uuid seems broken, this fails:
> nodejs -e "require('uuid');"
>
> Also it triggers lintian error node-package-install-in-nodejs-rootdir because
> it installs /usr/lib/nodejs/node-uuid.js.
>
> Next 1.4.0 is quite old and v. 3
On തിങ്കള് 08 ജനുവരി 2018 03:36 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> AFAICT upstream does not provide anything that can run in node: all files in
> dist run in the browser
> https://github.com/vuejs/vue/tree/dev/dist
> i.e. there is nothing you can run node -e "require('vue');" against
>
> Perhaps what y
On തിങ്കള് 08 ജനുവരി 2018 02:40 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Hi, I have packaged the vue.js library:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/vue.js.git
>
> It currently only provides the full UMD browser build, and it's built with
> webpack instead of rollup (that means the file is 468k r
On ഞായര് 07 ജനുവരി 2018 08:41 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Il 07/01/2018 15:59, Pirate Praveen ha scritto:
>> ...
>> ERROR in ./bin/src/help.md
>> Module parse failed:
>> /home/pravi/forge/debian/git/pkg-javascript/node-rollup/bin/src/help.md
>> Unexpect
Hi,
While we are waiting for buble and rollup-plugin-buble, I thought of
building it with webpack since we already have it in the archive. It
gave a few warnings and an error. May be those who know webpack a bit
more can help fix this error. I have pushed the changes to webpack
branch in alioth. B
On ഞായര് 07 ജനുവരി 2018 02:30 രാവിലെ, Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> Contains un-attributed code copies of (at least) parts of underscore.js.
>
> -- Chris Lamb Sat, 06 Jan 2018 20:06:30 +
>
Fixed and uploaded.
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
>
Control: tags -1 help
code is here https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-rollup-plugin-babel
since rollup is not in main, trying to use webpack, but getting this error.
webpack --config debian/webpack.config.js \
--target node \
--output-library-target=commonjs \
src/index.js dist/rollup-plugin-
On 01/03/2018 03:30 AM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> debian/copyright says Bryce Kahle but LICENSE says VMWare.
>
> -- Chris Lamb Tue, 02 Jan 2018 21:38:17 +
Fixed and reuploaded.
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected,
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:48:24 +0200 Andreas Tille wrote:
> Well, I think there is no real point to do another upload with this
> text change. I think we can save the time to really solve the issue
> and package babel. Let me know if you see any chance that I can
> help.
This is fixed now, but it
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:10:09 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> That version was using transpiled code shipped by upstream, which we
> cannot have it in main (source missing).
>
This is fixed now, but its waiting in NEW.
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/node-handlebars_3:4.0.
On തിങ്കള് 01 ജനുവരി 2018 02:20 വൈകു, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> binary:handlebars is NEW.
> binary:handlebars is NEW.
> source:node-handlebars is NEW.
> node-handlebars_4.0.10.orig.tar.gz is only available in NEW.
>
> Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
>
On ഞായര് 31 ഡിസംബര് 2017 09:26 വൈകു, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> I did not follow the issue, could you please be more specific, or give a
> link to
> a previous discussion ?
We have two source packages for jquery now. We maintain a custom build
system to generate libjs-jquery
https://anonscm.debian.org
On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 21:46:10 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Binary packages libjs-handlebars and libjs-handlebars.runtime are built
> from source package ruby-handlebars-assets which is the source only of
> the Ruby wrapper for Handlebars, not Handebars project itself.
>
> Instead, these package
On 12/31/2017 08:36 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> Accepted:
We can now build jquery using upstream build system. Do we still need to
maintain 2 source packages and a custom build system?
Thanks
Praveen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
On 12/31/2017 03:30 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> Contains unattributed gzip spec memo at test/test-files/spec.txt (and possibly
> others).
>
> -- Chris Lamb Sun, 31 Dec 2017 09:22:44 +
Fortunately, Jérémy Lal helped to replace gzip-js module with nodejs
builtin zlib module. So we don't need
On 12/31/2017 02:54 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Ha, node-gzip-js is also outdated - it has a similar better alternative
> https://github.com/nodeca/pako
>
> I see that node-jquery uses gzip-js only to compress dist files, no ?
> It's easy to get rid of that dependency since nodejs has the zlib module
On 12/31/2017 03:56 AM, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have moved all of my packages to salsa.debian.org, updated the vcs-*
> fields, and uploaded to the archive.
>
> I have also removed all of the corresponding repos on Alioth.
>
> I also suggest that you guys remove your repos from Aliot
On 12/31/2017 04:51 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Sorry if i did not catch this ITP first hand but may i point out that
> there are some
> much more popular (by several orders of magnitude), and better maintained
> (crc32 is six years old) alternatives out there:
> https://github.com/SheetJS/js-crc32
> h
Hi,
Now that node-dezalgo (in dependency chain of npm 5.x) also needs asap.
I think it makes sens to unbundle it. So if there is no objections I'd
like to do it in next few days.
Thanks
Praveen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javas
Control: affects -1 nodejs-dev
[copying nodejs/npm2deb maintainers]
bcc: pkg-javascript-devel, follow #845043
On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 09:11:00 + Niels Thykier
wrote:> Sure; the idea more about you developing the prototype in a separate
> package and less about the concrete name of the package.
Control: severity -1 grave
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 23:21:03 +0100 =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsOpbXkgTGFs?=
wrote:
> I'd like to lower the severity of this bug because it concerns code
that is
> not (yet) in debian. We'll raise it again if/when node-d3-zoom crashes
when
> building on build server.
segfault has r
On ചൊവ്വ 26 ഡിസംബര് 2017 11:13 വൈകു, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Hey Metal,
>
> Thanks for doing that. I've been thinking, there's an automated way to
> import a whole Alioth group to gitlab, so maybe it'd be better if we
> imported everything now instead of asking each developer to do it
> s
On 12/26/2017 02:12 AM, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> Alioth was deprecated and our repositories will *not* be automatically
> migrated to the new instance (Gitlab). I've created the js-team group
> there and everybody is welcome.
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/groups/js-team
Thank
On 2017, ഡിസംബർ 22 12:52:05 AM IST, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>[08:18:54 PM] if it migrates by then, the issues should be
>fixed
>[08:20:03 PM] ivodd: ack, will do that.
This is blocked by nodejs >= 6 not migrating to testing (one of node-babel
dependencies, node-regexpu-core declared this). Hop
Control: severity -1 normal
On 2017, ഡിസംബർ 21 3:28:29 PM IST, Ben Finney wrote:
>Package: node-gulp-babel
>Version: 7.0.0-2
>Severity: serious
>Justification: Policy 3.5
>
>Attempting to run a Gulp build that uses ‘gulp-babel’ fails
>immediately:
>
>=
>module.js:327
>throw err;
>
On 2017, ഡിസംബർ 18 11:44:57 PM IST, Hilko Bengen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am working on packaging a new version of GRR, an incident response
>platform that is written mostly in Python, with a browser-based UI
>using
>AngularJS.
>
>Apparently, the Javascript components that are sent to the browser are
>b
On ശനി 16 ഡിസംബര് 2017 11:16 വൈകു, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> You are deliberately taking an extreme case to fulfill your narrative. I
> would not fit nodejs and chai in the same basket.
see below, ruby-webmock is comparable here.
>> I did not even get heads up with webmock transition in ruby te
On ശനി 16 ഡിസംബര് 2017 10:44 വൈകു, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> I don't know anything about chai. Besides, since you are its maintainer,
> I would expect the investigation to be done by yourself rather than myself.
No, that is not how a transition is supposed to work. Do you expect
maintainer of no
On ശനി 16 ഡിസംബര് 2017 08:41 വൈകു, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> Why is this happening with chai 4.x and not 3.5?
That is what we need to find out. Possibly some deprecated methods are
removed from new version.
> Sorry, but I am gonna need more context to fix this.
We are trying to update chai fro
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 10:09:14 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> * Package name: node-copy-webpack-plugin
> Version : 4.2.0
> Upstream Author : Len Boyette
> * URL : https://github.com/webpack-contrib/copy-webpack-plugin
> * License : Expat
>
On 12/14/2017 03:30 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> one of our trainess looked at you package and found:
> * no code included, just a 10 lines json file
> * no description, just a verbatim copy out of the readme
>
> Please reconsider whether such a package is needed.
This module is a
On 12/14/2017 08:31 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: node-uglify
> Version: 2.8.29-3
> Severity: minor
>
> tglase@tglase-nb:~ $ uglifyjs --version
> 2.8.29
>
> This is after an upgrade. Before, it output:
> uglify-js 2.8.29
>
> There was apparently no change to the node-ug
package: three.js
version: 80+dfsg2-1
severity: important
When building gitlab 9.5.4 (currently in alioth git) I get the following
error.
ERROR in ./blob/3d_viewer/index.js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'three/build/three.module' in
'/usr/share/gitlab/app/assets/javascripts/blob/3d_viewe
On 12/12/2017 02:40 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Does adding to the webpack config:
>
> resolveLoader: {
> modules: ['/usr/lib/nodejs'],
> },
>
> as in here:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/vue.js.git/tree/debian/webpack.config.js#n11
>
> help ?
>
> Paolo
>
>
Found this
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:28:40 +0200 Julien Puydt
wrote:> I can't help but notice that Debian
has 1.20.1 while upstream is now up
> to 3.4.2.
>
> Could we get a less ancient version?
>
> Since the package is in the Debian JavaScript Maintainers repository, I
> might lend a help if you want to.
I
package: node-object-path
version: 0.11.3-1
severity: important
I'd like to upload chai 4.1.2 to unstable, please fix this test failures.
mocha test.js -R spec
get
✓ should return the value using unicode key
✓ should return the value using dot in key
✓ should return the value u
package: libjs-fetch
version: 2.0.3-1
severity: important
I'd like to upload chai 4.1.2 to unstable soon, please fix these failures.
xvfb-run -a -s "-screen 0 640x480x16" ./script/test
QStandardPaths: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set, defaulting to '/tmp/runtime-pravi'
Error loading resource
http://localh
package: node-v8flags
version: 2.0.11-2
severity: important
I'd like to upload chai 4.1.2 to unstable soon, please fix the test failure.
mkdir -p test-home
HOME=/<>/test-home mocha -R spec test.js
v8flags
✓ should cache and call back with the v8 flags for the running process
✓ shoul
package: node-yargs
version: 10.0.3-1
severity: important
I'd like to upload chai 4.1.2 to unstable soon, please fix these failures.
mocha --require ./test/before.js --timeout=8000 --check-leaks
․․․
․
Hi,
I have uploaded node-chai 4.1.2 to experimental as the tests for
following packages were failing libjs-fetch, node-cliui,
node-object-path, node-v8flag, node-yargs.
I'd like to upload it to unstable once these issues are fixed. If you
can have a look at any of these failures, please do.
Than
On വ്യാഴം 07 ഡിസംബര് 2017 08:30 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Please someone allow me DM upload access for this package or sponsor the
> upload:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-wrap-ansi.git
Uploaded and granted DM access.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatu
Hi,
gitlab 9.5 needs node-jquery-mousewheel. I think separately maintaining
node-jquery-mousewheel and generating libjs-jquery-mousewheel binary
from that is a better approach (we can keep the dependency in
jquery-goodies) as we can update it independently of jquery-goodies if
required for gitlab.
On ബുധന് 06 ഡിസംബര് 2017 02:38 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Hi, I have packaged node-locate-path:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-locate-path.git
>
> This is required to update node-find-up to 2.1.0, which is required to update
> node-yargs to 10.0.3, which is required for li
Package: node-es6-promise
version: 3.2.2+ds-1
severity: wishlist
Please update to 4.1.1 release. I have tried to update it in babel
branch (using babel), but tests of node-yargs (in git) fails.
mocha --require ./test/before.js --timeout=8000 --check-leaks
/<>/test/completion.js:7
require('es6-pro
On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 17:44:20 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> The binary package webpack depends on non-existing package
> node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin, making the former impossible to install.
Both webpack and node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin was in NEW, but webpack
was accepted before node-uglifyjs-
On 2017, ഡിസംബർ 1 4:08:53 PM IST, Ben Finney wrote:
>Ross Gammon writes:
>
>> This tripped me up too when packaging something that needed the
>> system-wide installed Tasks.
>
>So the Debian packages install the plug-ins, in such a way that it
>doesn't work by default with Debian-packaged ‘grun
On വെള്ളി 03 നവംബര് 2017 06:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> it is strange that the package Build-Depends: on itself!?
Thanks to Paolo Greppi, we now use node-babel-preset-es2015 as a build
dependency and reuploaded.
> Thorsten
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond t
On വെള്ളി 01 ഡിസംബര് 2017 12:43 വൈകു, Ross Gammon wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> This tripped me up too when packaging something that needed the
> system-wide installed Tasks.
>
> See if this helps:
> https://wiki.debian.org/grunt
This and other build tools usage is documented here
https://wiki.debian.or
On വെള്ളി 01 ഡിസംബര് 2017 12:05 രാവിലെ, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> According to this:
> https://medium.com/webpack/webpack-and-rollup-the-same-but-different-a41ad427058c
> we really should use rollup over webpack.
But we don't have rollup in main, we have been working on it for quite
some time and it
On 2017, നവംബർ 30 8:40:01 PM IST, Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
>binary:node-crc32 is NEW.
>binary:node-crc32 is NEW.
>source:node-crc32 is NEW.
>
>Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual
>action
>from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a
>goo
On 2017, നവംബർ 29 3:39:51 PM IST, Paolo Greppi wrote:
>Hi all, I an trying to build from vue.js sources, see:
>ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/871459
>repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/vue.js.git
>
>More precisely what is wanted is the browser (UMD) build, see:
>https://vuejs.org/
On 2017, നവംബർ 28 9:04:45 AM IST, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
>I can do it once node-ms clears NEW.
>
Uploaded, and it is in NEW because of libjs-debug. You may have to talk to ftp
masters again if it is blocking further updates.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please exc
On 2017, നവംബർ 28 5:10:36 AM IST, Paolo Greppi wrote:
>Hi, I have prepared the update to node-debug version 3.1.0
>
>Note that this now depends on node-ms, whose upload was sponsored 3
>weeks ago:
>https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2017-November/022208.html
>(but is
On 2017, നവംബർ 24 12:30:11 AM IST, Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>while working on NEW one of our new trainees found two issues with your
>
>package:
>
>- long description says that it is in contrib, but changelog says that
> now it is placed in main
>- upstream's LICENSE file says that
On ചൊവ്വ 14 നവംബര് 2017 03:51 രാവിലെ, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Using only debian packages (and no npm-installed module) I can't
> reproduce the segfault in debian/sid:
>
> dev:~/Software/debian/node-d3-zoom/node-d3-zoom master$ webpack --config
> debian/webpack.config.js index.js build/d3-zoom.js --ta
On വെള്ളി 10 നവംബര് 2017 03:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> npm in debian/rules ...
removed npm and reuploaded
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
>
signatu
On വെള്ളി 10 നവംബര് 2017 03:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please clarify with upstream why Raymond Hill is mentioned wit a different
> license.
Since both are compatible licenses. I have added both licenses now and
reuploaded.
> Thanks!
> Thorsten
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free
On വെള്ളി 10 നവംബര് 2017 03:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sindre Sorhus seems to be missing in your debian/copyright.
Fixed and reuploaded.
> Thanks!
> Thorsten
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if
On വെള്ളി 10 നവംബര് 2017 03:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the license file mentions Kevin Beaty, so he should appear in your
> debian/cyopright.
Fixed and reuploaded.
> Thanks!
> Thorsten
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your
On വെള്ളി 10 നവംബര് 2017 03:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please mention Robert Penner in your debian/copyright.
Fixed and reuploaded
> Thanks!
> Thorsten
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you up
On 2017, നവംബർ 9 1:55:08 AM IST, Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
>How can I reproduce and so on
Just install a newer version of nodejs with this package already installed.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-d
On ശനി 04 നവംബര് 2017 04:30 രാവിലെ, Chris Lamb wrote:
> -1 version has npm install in debian/rules.
>
Please accept or reject -2 (so I can reupload it).
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which ad
On ഞായര് 29 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 03:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't think calling npm in debian/rules is a good thing for a package in
> contrib ..
>
> Thorsten
removed npm and reuploaded
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand wh
On വെള്ളി 03 നവംബര് 2017 02:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> npm in debian/rules ...
>
Removed npm use and reuploaded.
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
On വെള്ളി 03 നവംബര് 2017 02:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> ... another npm in debian/rules
>
removed npm and reuploaded
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concern
On വെള്ളി 03 നവംബര് 2017 10:53 രാവിലെ, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On വെള്ളി 03 നവംബര് 2017 06:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> it is strange that the package Build-Depends: on itself!?
>
> Don't gcc build depend on gcc? node-babel also buil
On വെള്ളി 03 നവംബര് 2017 03:02 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2017, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>> source:node-acorn-dynamic-import is NEW.
>>>
>>> Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual
>>> action
&g
On വെള്ളി 03 നവംബര് 2017 06:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> it is strange that the package Build-Depends: on itself!?
Don't gcc build depend on gcc? node-babel also build depend on itself
(it build depends on many of the binaries generated from node-babel
source).
Babel is a tr
On 09/27/2017 05:58 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> binary:node-acorn-dynamic-import is NEW.
> binary:node-acorn-dynamic-import is NEW.
> source:node-acorn-dynamic-import is NEW.
>
> Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
> from the ftpteam to process. The upload
On ചൊവ്വ 31 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 02:28 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Before I file ITPs for these:
> - asap
> - chownr
https://github.com/isaacs/chownr/issues/14
> - dnscache
> - gulp-if
> - gulp-watch
I think we could skip this, likely required only for development (to run
gulp when files change).
>
On 10/31/2017 12:29 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 10/30/2017 11:46 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> TypeError: Cannot read property 'close' of undefined
>
> I could not reproduce it on another system, so it has to be an issue on
> my local envrironment. I will merge yo
On 10/30/2017 11:27 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Regarding node-chalk, if you refer to this:
>
> $ cd node-chalk
> $ node
>> var test=require('./');
> TypeError: Cannot read property 'close' of undefined
> at Object.
> (/home/paolog/Sviluppo/debian/node-chalk/index.js:66:74)
> ..
yes, the same
On തിങ്കള് 30 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 04:18 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> BTW this is only Vue core, there are also some supporting libraries which may
> need packaging:
> vue-router, vuex, vue-cli, vue-loader, vue-server-renderer,
> vue-class-component, vue-rx and vue-devtools.
>
> Any help or suggestion
On ഞായര് 29 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 03:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> according to the file headers Facebook seems to be copyright holder of some
> stuff.
>
> Thorsten
>
Fixed and reuploaded.
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your
package: node-rollup-plugin-commonjs
version: 8.2.4-1
severity: serious
When building rollup using node-rollup-plugin-commonjs, it fails with
error (with npm installed rollup-plugin-commonjs, build succeeds).
src/node-entry.js → dist/rollup.js, dist/rollup.es.js...
[!] (commonjs plugin) TypeError
On വ്യാഴം 26 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 03:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please also mention at least
> babylon-6.18.0/src/plugins/jsx/fromCodePoint.js
> in your debian/copyright.
Fixed and reupoaded.
> Thanks!
> Thorsten
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don'
On ബുധന് 25 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 07:08 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I can reach the segfaulting point faster by setting break point at
> thread creation
>
> b pthread_create.c:333
>
> after 8 c, I reach the segfault point.
>
>
>
hopefully more useful bt
(gd
I can reach the segfaulting point faster by setting break point at
thread creation
b pthread_create.c:333
after 8 c, I reach the segfault point.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 21:06:34 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> On തിങ്കള് 16 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 08:54 വൈകു, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> >
> > Can you attach the whole failing sbuild log please ?
> >Attached.
>
> The diff between the current git master and local build is also attach
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel]
node-babel_6.25.0+dfsg-13_amd64.changes REJECTED
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:25:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thorsten Alteholz
To: Pirate Praveen
CC: Chris Lamb
node-babel contains a directory .../traceur
according to LICENSE it
On ചൊവ്വ 10 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 03:49 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On ചൊവ്വ 10 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 03:05 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> Sorry about the whole discussion escalating to this level.
>
> Just add context, I was asked to add this to copyright file by another
> ftp master and i
Hi,
After a very long effort packaging countless Node.js modules and tools
like grunt, gulp, babel and webpack (I think at least 2 years must have
passed), I can finally build handlebars library in main. But when using
this version of the library in ruby-handlebars-assets, I get the
following erro
On ബുധന് 18 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 01:39 വൈകു, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Also please note that Ruby programs are usually very picky about
> particular versions of their dependencies.
>
> I call it a "gem hell" and it was a reason why I gave up helping with
> Ruby packaging and switched to redmine from source
On ചൊവ്വ 17 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 02:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does the JS foundation have any copyright for debian/*?
>
> Thorsten
>
Fixed and reuploaded.
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload n
On ബുധന് 18 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 04:08 രാവിലെ, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Dear Javascript Team,
>
> Would you please consider maintaining the "numerous [...] nodejs
> modules" necessary for Debian's Alioth replacement to run on a
> Debian-built GitLab package? We are facing a scenario that confirms
>
On തിങ്കള് 16 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 07:13 വൈകു, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> A memory allocation failure... is it possible you ran out of memory ?
Very unlikely, I have 16 GB ram.
> Anyway i tried typing the same commands as in debian/rules of node-d3-zoom,
> but this time using webpack, babel-cli, babel-loader
On 10/16/2017 04:32 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I'm using libuv1 1.11 (built locally) and still seeing the segfault, I
> think more dbgsym packages need to be installed.
after zlib1g-dbg installed
(gdb) bt
#0 0x18df10069fc8 in ?? ()
#1 0x18df105deecf in ?? ()
#2 0x
101 - 200 of 693 matches
Mail list logo
