On Apr 8, 2007, at 10:19 PM, Stephen the Cook wrote:
MB Software Solutions wrote:
Sales Info wrote:
If they're bottom feeding
I was feeling left out of this thread, but I got 2 of those postcards
this morning. Whew! I'm a member of the club again!
On Apr 9, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
I was feeling left out of this thread, but I got 2 of those postcards
this morning. Whew! I'm a member of the club again!
I've still never received one. Not that I'm complaining!
Remember Groucho!
On Apr 9, 2007, at 1:37 PM, Hal Kaplan wrote:
P.S. How's my quoting?
Mavelous
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
On Apr 9, 2007, at 2:54 PM, Bill Anderson wrote:
unless it's imperative that users have an operating
system with a more exciting look and feel, XP will offer better
performance than Vista.
Everybody who is surprised by this, please raise your hand...
OK, I thought so.
Carry on.
On Apr 10, 2007, at 2:28 PM, Derek Kalweit wrote:
one of those amendments there... separation of something...
As Ted pointed out, all those messages ago: that would be Separation
of [T] and [OT]. No need to thank me for the clarification.
___
On Apr 10, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
Well people also change over time.
OK, so what are the rules to make a marriage last. Really. Here are a
few of mine:
1. Don't do it if you are not ready.
This means:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
Well people also change over time.
OK, so what are the rules to make a marriage last. Really. Here are a
few of mine:
1. Don't do it if you are not ready.
This means:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 9:14 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
does 0.9 imply almost ready
Yup -- To me, it is really: Almost _reliable_, not necessarily
imminent. The 1.0 is a stable version that one could use with
confidence (even though we all know that the *really* reliable one is
1.1). As Vince
On Apr 15, 2007, at 3:26 PM, john harvey wrote:
Have her save the files to her hard drive,
Thank you, John. I forwarded your advice to her.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
On Apr 16, 2007, at 11:59 AM, MB Software Solutions wrote:
To answer your question, I see it as no, I wouldn't want it web
based
because of the fact that when guys are doing most of the
non-web-publishing work, they're offline at a rink. The only thing to
go online would be the stats to
Hey - - - - - -
Developing a web-based application (PHP/MySQL). Want to use dynamic
menus. Willing to roll-my-own, but I am reluctant to do so: I'm not
that great at javascript; PHP examples don't seem as flexible as JS;
I am reticent to reinvent the bad cliche; etc.
Anybody have a source
On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:31 AM, Man-wai CHANG wrote:
I was wondering about that movie... Can the Sun be turned off? :)
What the he11 are you people smoking this morning?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
On Apr 17, 2007, at 11:27 AM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
All you would have to do to make it dynamic is replace the text and
locations in the links.
Thanks, but I meant like the example on Allen's site. Dynamic menus
provide the ability to put many choices in a relatively-small space.
My
On Apr 17, 2007, at 11:43 AM, Allen wrote:
I can give you the js as I
cant remember where it came from now.
that would be lovely, thank you.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
Michael Madigan wrote:
She's awful. She's Francis Ford Coppola's sister.
Enough said.
I knew there had to be some inside connection...no way could she get
anything on her own acting merit!
But she's Meryl Streep compared to his daughter, Sophia. She
completely ruined Godfather III.
On Apr 17, 2007, at 1:25 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
One, pointer, Ken: you will want to have a fallback option if the user
has Javascript disabled.
Thanks, Ted. Most of the users (or at least the ones important to
*this* question) will be on an intra-net so i'll have control over
that. Not all
On Apr 17, 2007, at 3:46 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
You might give the tree view JS menu in the link below a try.
http://www.treemenu.net/
Looks nice, and a good price, too. (Right person, right question,
right forum, and ... a good answer!)
Thank you - - -Ken
Hi - -- - -- - -- -
I have started to use TB on my Linux machine. Anybody know if there
is a setting which quotes highlighted text?
I can't find it, only quote all of the prior message or none of it.
Ken
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Justin Darnell wrote:
I'm surprised there's not an addon to do this yet.
Thanks. I'm surprised to see that it doesn't do it. I also thought
there was a how to do it thread here some time ago, but I couldn't
find it in the archives.
Ken
On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
You might give Thunderbird Quickquote a try:
That works great! Thank you, Leland.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Justin Darnell wrote:
there's not an addon to do this yet
Thanks to you, too -- if you are following the thread, Leland got to
your link before me, and found QuickQuote. I installed it and it
works great. Based on a 2-minute test, it is highly recommended.
On Apr 20, 2007, at 9:24 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
I have to
convert the whole message to rich text, then back to plain.
How did you add the sig?
Just typed it in to new signatures
Do you also have the option for Responding: Use
the same message format as the original message
Not to be a jerk, but can we revive this thread in the [OT] forum,
please?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
Hey - - - - -
I know, why ask a PHP question in here?
1. You know the context of what I am talking about.
2. PHP forums main answer: RTFM
-- not relevant for this question
3. Secondary PGP forum answer: Search the archives
-- the archives, um, inhale vigorously (at least
On Apr 24, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
What do you guys do?
Waste time reading and responding to ProFox?
Actually, it is true. Particularly in the old days when there was
actually some Fox in here. Reading, thinking about, and even
answering (on those rare occasions when
On Apr 24, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Stepping through code in Komodo seems to work in perl pretty well.
It says that it does, and it looks like it should, but it doesn't
seem to in PHP. It just jumped all over the place
On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Bill Arnold wrote:
There are many PHP debugging techniques that can save you countless
hours when coding.
Thanks for the link, Bill.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
On Apr 24, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Chet Gardiner wrote:
Just a quick check brought up these 5 threads on electric cars and
cars
in the recent past:
You are so good at rationalizing...
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
On Apr 24, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Did you see down at the bottom of my post about the Perl
Development Kit?
Yes. Am I missing something about debugging PHP code? (Afternoon haze
setting in...)
___
Post Messages to:
On Apr 26, 2007, at 10:24 AM, Derek Kalweit wrote:
List seems quiet today...Anyone else working?
Working? Yup. On Fox stuff? Not for a while. Looked over on the
archives for OT, just to see if the list was alive. Yup, but just
the usual ultra-righties and ultra-lefties exchanging
On May 4, 2007, at 8:57 AM, Vince Teachout wrote:
I NEED URGNT ANSR NOW MAIL IT TO ME.
That being said, I wonder if the original post is a leg pull. Still
funny, though.
Gotta be -- just too rude, persistent and obnoxious not to be. I
mean, he knew enough SQL to create
On May 4, 2007, at 9:31 PM, Michael Madigan wrote:
we stop talking about beer
**That's Crazy Talk! Stop it!!***
Ken
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this
On May 5, 2007, at 12:47 AM, MB Software Solutions wrote:
so stop taking my wording to be so... I seemed to be pissing many
folks off today.
Don't sweat it, Michael. It is a word that seems bred into us United
Statesians.
Ken
___
Post
On May 4, 2007, at 10:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was actually looking for FoxPro-themed Windows wallpaper,
I think Whil has some fox graphics on his web site
(hentzenwerke.com). I took a quick look, but couldn't find it.
___
Post Messages
On May 5, 2007, at 11:49 AM, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
No wallpaper, though.
Oh, yeah. But if you allow the icons to tile as wallpaper, it would
be *so* beautiful.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
Fellow ProFoxxers:
Now, now: Don't pick on him, as he is clearly superior to us all.
Note his VFP accomplishments, as proudly proclaimed on his *awesome*
web site:
- Class and object development (O!)
- FoxPro enhancements through Microsoft's API (ahh!)
- HTML Creation
On May 12, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Stephen the Cook wrote:
Maybe he had work to do and found all this bandwidth as a waste of
time?
Certainly. That has always been the knock of the ProFox list. Too
bad we hadn't invented the Tech-only list and convention earlier.
Some outstanding folks exited
Did they ever recover The scream?
Yup:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/5303200.stm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
Hey -- -- - - - - -
One of my monitors died last week, so I am thinking about a flat
panel one.
My question has to do with hooking it up. I have a bunch o' computers
all hooked together on a KVM switch. The switch has the older VGA-
type of connectors. The flat panels all seem to have
Thanks, Gil, Virgil - - -
I have dual monitors, too, though presently I am only KVM'ing one of
them, even though another one has a dual video card. I thought when I
got the new monitor, I'd throw another KVM switch into the mix. I
want one which has a physical switch, however -- I am
On May 20, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
Problem is VISTA's software for scanning appears to be the fax and
scan
wizard which works good, BUT it doesn't let you export to a PDF
which I need
to do.
Virgil - --
Do it from inside Acrobat Professional if you have it. You can
On May 21, 2007, at 11:07 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
(Are we [OT] yet?)
We are (or at least I am) now.
a gamma-emitting cookie
I'd eat the gamma one, because as a kid I thought it sounded like it
would be cool to emit Gamma Rays! g
Seriously, people uneducated in science believe *anything.*
On May 21, 2007, at 3:38 PM, John Weller wrote:
I had a horrible suspicion that that might be the case! Ah
well, back to the drawing board.
How many files/pages are there?
Hey, *somebody* in here has to have Publisher installed, and could
PDF'inate them for you. It is part of M$ Orifice
On May 22, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
Why you can't give linux away to the desktop community.
Wow, you actually consider that impartial?
Well, as somebody who has arrived at the never give M$ another dime
community, I think that the article is sorta right. My bellwether on
On May 26, 2007, at 6:38 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
If you want to hire yourself out as an electrician or plumber,
though, you're going to need a license.
I agree that the analogy is flawed, but I think most of us agree that
a similar process is the right way to do it: a well-designed and
Hey - -
In fact, it was the other way around. ATT wireless was acquired by
Cingular. Afterward, they chose to take the ATT name, I suspect
because it is better known, but, as your post indicates, the new-old
name carries quite a lot of baggage.
On Jun 7, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Vince Teachout wrote:
It was enormous gaul on the part of MS to cut
off the majority of its (customer's) toolkit
I'm not really following this thread at all, I was just surprised
to see
Julius Caesar working for Microsoft. :-P
Oops, you meant Napoleon.
On Jun 7, 2007, at 8:36 PM, Vince Teachout wrote:
If you made a Napoleon joke, some might think it small of you.
groan
Thanks for the enlightenment on gall, Gaul, Gallia, by golly!
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
On Jun 11, 2007, at 3:11 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
Apple Introduces Safari for Windows
Phooey -- it requires XP. I stopped at W2K.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version
On Jun 11, 2007, at 3:12 PM, Matthew Jarvis wrote:
I'm 45 Is this what it's like to get old?
Gee, I don't know. I'm only 39 (well, OK: 39[L])!
I've been feeling a lot like that, too. Whil has posted similar
notes. Trying to start over in new languages and new platforms is
harder than
On Jun 11, 2007, at 5:15 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote:
Is it easier in any other career? fwiw, I'm feeling similar...yuck.
I don't know: Folks, whadaya think? Other technical careers are
certainly hard:
Doctors have to (or *should*) keep up with an incredible pace of
change. Compared
On Jun 12, 2007, at 9:17 AM, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
Let's not every forget Vista Barbie Edition.
Shoot. I thought it would be the Klaus Barbie version. That would
be appropriate for Vista.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
I know it isn't relevant to Cingular, but I have the older version of
one of these:
http://tinyurl.com/2gv9sc
I bring it up only to say that I used to have a separate Palm PDA,
and the Palm OS is much better than Windows Mobile. the latter is a
mess on the UI. It doesn't flow smoothly
On Jun 14, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Frank Burcaw wrote:
It works pretty good, but I realized that the user could enter a
comma before the word INC, LLC, CORP etc, like ROBERT JONES, LLC.
Just a workaround, but why don't you take the comma out of the string
when it contains INC, LLC, CORP etc,
On Jun 15, 2007, at 7:25 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
a patchy, clumsy,
awkward, hard-to-maintain or fragile fix
I'll buy that...
Ken Kluge Kixmoeller
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
Pretty good for an amateur. If he was in a competition for opera
singers he wouldn't have a chance -- notice his voice cracking on the
final vincero! This is a tough aria to carry off; that high C
isn't for the faint-hearted. It is showey, though, and that probably
swayed the judges. But
On Jun 18, 2007, at 1:37 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote:
Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
The AD justified his lack of knowledge of the cross country team
runners by saying, This was a pep rally for the fall sports teams.
'Running' is not a sport.
He didn't really say thatdid he
I had
Michael Madigan wrote:
Come on, he's not that bad.
No, he is not. Hell, I'd give a couple of teeth to sing as well (or
in my case, to be able to carry a tune at all).
I have been in many opera houses from world-class to second-tier
(like our own Minnesota Opera), to definitely
On Jul 3, 2007, at 8:06 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote:
That sounds similar to my reasoning for starting MBSS. g
One of the great myths of American entrepreneurship is that people
start companies because of the combination of a great idea and
burning desire. I have hte exact statistic in
On Jul 4, 2007, at 7:22 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
Well, a buring desire to put food on the table.
I find that to be a much more deep-felt and consistent motivation
than, Ooh! Ooh! I have a great idea!!!
Yup, that is it: we get pushed out one way or another and have the
Oh, Shoot moment: gotta
Hey - - -
Quick question -- I've already spent too much time on this
stooopid question:
Trying to format a JavaScript message back to a user, like:
--
Hey User! Do:
- this thing +chr(13) +
- that thing +br / +
- this other thing + chr(13)
Before
On Jul 6, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Christof Wollenhaupt wrote:
Hi Ken,
Can't figger out hoe to do a line feed... (must be Friday)
'Line 1\nLine 2'
\n = Linefeed
\\ = \
\ =
Oh, like PHP Thanks, Christof!
(good to see *someone's* still working, too)
Ken
On Jul 9, 2007, at 4:09 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
JavaScript is case-sensitive. Change the line to:
var donow = new Date();
Oh, heck -- yup. I swear I have had it both ways grumble.
Some examples have the ; some not, Some have a space before the (),
some not. *Those* don't seem to
typical snide comment
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive:
On Jul 13, 2007, at 1:44 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
What, picking on a DEVELOPER who can't...
I can see that you are shocked, *shocked* at my behavior. Mea
Culpa. g
However, you are making a grand assumption that he is a developer.
Upon seeing ProFox or FoxPro, he could have assumed that we
On Jul 18, 2007, at 6:14 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
Me: If we're so smart, why is it we're not rich and famous?
He: Ethics.
Me: Oh, right. I keep forgetting.
A local (St. Paul/Minneapolis) radio personality put it best: One
quality determines whether you will *get* rich. You just have to be
Hey - - -- - -- -
For reasons too obscure to say here, I think we need to install V-
SP1. I looked through the archives, but I'm not sure -- is there
compelling reason *not* to apply SP1? I see that some people have had
poorer performance -- weren't there some other issues?
Ken
On Mar 12, 2008, at 9:15 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
IIRC the non-MSDN
release has been delayed due to it
bluescreening some machines so I
would check into that.
It is out now --- Kim's machine has been asking us to do the update
for a couple of days.
On Mar 12, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
One change she made is to add music behind the show, if that is a
clue.
Any suggestions?
-
It may think that the audio is tagged to a specific slide instead
of
On Mar 12, 2008, at 9:41 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
Well, yeah, but you didn't make a very good case for it. If you hate
it, friends shouldn't let friends use MS...
I know -- it is one of those seemed like a good idea at the time
deals. It looked like the path of least resistance. It was on
On Mar 13, 2008, at 8:47 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
The never-ending software story: it looked great in the demo, but fell
apart in the deployment :)
I'm sorry to say that I did one of those, sort of. Customer asked for
a new report. I did it; it looked good and the numbers seemed
reasonable.
Hey - - -
I know that I shouldn't admit this, but I am just now encountering my
firstest-ever need to decode XML. Thought I when confronted: Hey, I
have heard about the XMLtoCursor function -- that'll do it. Yup, but
as far as I can tell, there isn't any means to extract nested tables.
Actually one more (potentially-loaded) question:
3. Would I be better off doing it in something other than VFP9?
Ken
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this
On Mar 13, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Patrick Bibro wrote:
I used MSXMLDOM to parse out what I needed instead.
oxml = CREATEOBJECT(Microsoft.XMLDOM)
Thanks, Patrick -- -
I am trying this, but I have been looking for an hour on the M$ site,
but I can't find a reference on the PEM's. Trying to
Thanks to all -- I'm not going to figure it out before a couple weeks
of vacation (holiday, for you continentals).
Ken
On Mar 13, 2008, at 6:54 PM, Andrew Stirling wrote:
here's a link on the foxite.com site
http://www.foxite.com/articles/read.aspx?id=38document=getting-to-
On Mar 14, 2008, at 9:47 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
I have two major applications that parse very complex XML that comes
from an HTTP call. It was originally written in VFP7. I recently
overhauled it using Python and call it using the run command. It runs
seamlessly in my application.
Thank
Just back from vacation. I want to weigh in on this:
__stephen's original question: Jesus, man or myth? I believe that the
answer is Yes. Remember, myth doesn't mean something that is made
up. Marion-Webster: a usually traditional story of ostensibly
historical events that serves to unfold
Some people expressed an interest in this...
Thanks, Bill -- I was one of those.
(H--- is there a UG meeting or something that I could use to
write off a trip to LA???)
Ken
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
Hey - -- -- - - --
One of the wonderful little surprises that greeted me coming home
from vacation was that my server raid software is reporting a pending
failure.
Specifically:
- the Box is W2K server, fully SP'ed
- the utility reporting it is Promise Technology FactCheck
monitoring
Well, that happened fast!
I powered down to check connections, etc. like it told me to, and
that was the end. Bye-bye server.
I must have had a coincidental failure, because I also haven't been
able to get on-line until just now. Cable problems, I guess. Got just
one machine on-line, and
OK, OK, I know nobody is listening, but here goes: (I'm counting on
the power of the magic Send button to provide me insight.)
So I figure: let's try creating a new RAID array with my 2 new 500Gb
disks. When I mount them in the old server box, and turn on the
power, the power pops OFF
Bad power supply?
Does it boot without the drives?
Justin
Doesn't appear to be bad, though that is what I was wondering, too.
Yes, it boots (or tries to) without the drives.
They are significantly bigger drives - do they draw more power? Is
that
what is causing the problem?
John
(Sorry, I am copying pasting from the Archive pages. -- No eMail
without my server)
Bad power supply?
Does it boot without the drives?
Justin
Doesn't appear to be bad, though that is what I was wondering, too.
Yes, it boots (or tries to) without the drives.
They are significantly
Hi - - -- - -
Anybody who has been following my server problems --- I decided that
I didn't want to maintain my own server for a while, so I bailed and
moved my sites over to LunarPages.
I did so in great haste, recalling your recommendations and trying to
get back in business AFAP.
On Apr 7, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Whil Hentzen wrote:
As far as expectations, I don't know that I have _expectations_
That was me. I recalled people in here praising them for their
service, though I did a very quick search of the archives and
couldn't find messages like that. So, either it was a
On Apr 7, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Randy Joles wrote:
I do have the source, but I'm dealing with almost 8000 tables and 3200
prg files. How would you handle this? Thanks
Woa! 8,000 tables? Geepers.
I am just curious: why do you need to need to pack/reindex every
night? Unless you are dealing
On Apr 7, 2008, at 3:30 PM, Randy Joles wrote:
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
Let's try this again: be sure to trim your posts! (Some pretty darn
useful posts, there. g )
Ken
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
On Apr 8, 2008, at 2:40 PM, Mike Wohlrab wrote:
Both of you guys, keep it NF please.
I disagree. Banter is OK. It keeps us friends, not just colleagues.
The problem sometimes has been that some folks can't distinguish the
two. That is not the case here.
Just 'cause you got your hand
On Apr 8, 2008, at 6:43 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
No. This is for subscribers to the ProFoxTech list only. There is no
abuse possible for ProFox, since all topics are available.
Sure there is, same as Tech: People who post OT topics as NF,
unmarked, or as one notorious abuser, with Digest
On Apr 8, 2008, at 9:00 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
some
people use it for accounts at work, where many OT threads would not be
appropriate.
I take the point.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
On Apr 9, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
I always thought that having a desktop full of icons was a measure of
status in the Windows world. Most Windows systems I see are full of
'em. I wonder how many people know that they can delete them?
I have always thought it was a negative
On Apr 9, 2008, at 4:24 PM, Alan Bourke wrote:
I limit myself to one column-full on the left including My
Computer, My Documents and the bin.
Gee, this is starting to sound like a Whil Just wondering discussion.
I keep the minimum possible:
Windoze: My Computer, My Network, and the bin (in
On Apr 9, 2008, at 5:04 PM, Paul M¢Nett wrote:
Windoze: My Computer, My Network, and the bin (in the lower right
corner, as god intended it). I'd get rid of the first 2 if I could.
right-click on desktop, properties, desktop, customize desktop.
You must be usin' some fancy-schmancy version
On Apr 9, 2008, at 5:00 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
Leopard by default creates and uses a 'Downloads' directory.
I have 10.4 -- is that Leopard? (I lose track of the animals.) It has
the Downloads directory, too (ugh -- on the desktop, but I know how
to move *that*).
Ken
On Apr 9, 2008, at 5:08 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Has anyone built an application using this technique?
I agree with Paul, but if you are running into size issues, one step
short of going to a server-based DB (or as a stop-gap until you do)
is to split the table vertically.
I think splitting
On Apr 9, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
That must have been created by your browser, since that wasn't
standard OS behavior.
Or it was created by moi and I just don't remember...
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
On Apr 9, 2008, at 9:10 PM, Gil Hale wrote:
Ken, I must have missed an earlier post where you maybe mentioned
having
gotten a Mac? When?
I have always been platform-agnostic, and I've always had a Mac. When
I was getting $0 revenue from it in the late '90's, I just had an old
one in
On Apr 10, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
I happened to be back in Rochester visiting when Scoble came here to
San Antonio.
OK, I'll take the cheap shot: So *that's* why it got such a good
rating! (ba-da-boom)
Somebody had to do it.
Apologies all around.
Ken
On Apr 10, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
It's not (and shouldn't be) a permanent irrevocable choice.
Thanks so much for the thoughts --
I'll continue the discussion on ProLinux, but not any time too soon
-- clients breathing down my neck -- still can't get the old server
box to power
201 - 300 of 519 matches
Mail list logo
