You want this format now:
http://
/api/review-requests/?changenum=&repository=
That will return a list matching that criteria. The first item will be what
you want. You can use that data as-is or follow the links in the payload.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board
Home has nothing to do with the checks. That's just for our own usage.
You need to run post-review from within an SVN, CVS, Git, etc. checkout
directory.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Mon,
Thanks Chris
I followed the link as per your suggestion but i could not see field review
request id in XML output. What i am expecting the get_review_request_by_
changenum subroutine should return review id or i am missing something here.
Regards,
Jack.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Christia
It would help to know what you are seeing. If that review request is public,
on the provided repository, with the provided changenum, you should see it.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Tue, S
In this case, it doesn't look as if you have any review requests with that
changenum on that repository that are accessible via your user.
This will by default only show ones that are opened for review and publicly
viewable. If you want ones that are also closed, you can also pass
&status=all.
If
I generated the URL as
http://ccsdtool.na.xware.com/ccsdtool/api/review-requests/?changenum=119631&repository=1/
self.myurl = self.rbserver +
'/api/review-requests/?changenum=%s&repository=1/' % changenum
And pass this url, if you look into the code snippet below once i get the
self.myurl, t
You don't want the / in the arguments to the URL.
The HTTP Authorization Required means you need to supply the credentials for
a user in the request. This uses the standard HTTP Basic Auth spec, of which
there are many examples of uses in Python.
See http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/web
Hi Chris,
If i comments that part of the code i.e ( def
get_review_request_by_changenum) the posting of review request is progressed
ahead. But as i told i am trying to get the review id from the changenum, I
am not able to do so as you told that API has changed.
Also HTTP Basic Auth is being tak
That was it. Thank you Christian !
On Sep 26, 11:23 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> What do you have in your .reviewboardrc file?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 26,
Hi, I'm using RB 1.6.1 with LDAP authentication.
I want to each user can modifiy his email address.
I tried add the users a group with auth|user|Can change user, but it still
not working...
Does somebody can help me?
Thanks in advance.
Martin.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate
Hi,
I have been trying to upgrade my current reviewboard instance to 1.6.1 from
the older 1.0.9. But when I try to upgrade the site, its giving me the
following error and failing the upgrade. Any idea why?
Creating tables ...
Creating table accounts_localsiteprofile
Creating table attachments_fi
Martin wrote:
Hi, I'm using RB 1.6.1 with LDAP authentication.
I want to each user can modifiy his email address.
I tried add the users a group with auth|user|Can change user, but it
still not working...
NOTE I'm not using LDAP with RB :-)
Usually when using LDAP it is a read only resource,
premod dev wrote:
I have been trying to upgrade my current reviewboard instance to 1.6.1
from the older 1.0.9. But when I try to upgrade the site, its giving
me the following error and failing the upgrade. Any idea why?
...
No fixtures found.
Registering new SCM Tool Plastic SCM
(reviewboard.
Thanks a lot Chris.
I am managing my own instance of ReviewBoard, but, the LDAP is under the
client control.
So, the only chance to change the email is from the admin account.
I will tell you if I can figure out an alternative way.
Thanks you very much.
Regards.
MArtin.
--
Want to help t
Yes this is using post-review as the client. Here's the output when I
disable anonymous reads:
C:\Python27\Scripts\post-review --server=http://server: --debug --
repository=repo_name
>>> RBTools 0.3.3
>>> Home =
>>> hg showconfig
>>> hg root
>>> p4 info
>>> repository info: Path: , Base path:
It turns out that the reason Review Board thought my database hadn't been
updated was because it hadn't: I had moved the site onto my new machine and
not updated the relevant paths in /conf/*.
My current status is that I now have two perfectly working sites, the legacy
running off SQLite and pr
Plastic's a red herring. It just happens to precede the evolution failure.
For some reason, your evolution history for RB 1.0.9 doesn't include the
"changedescs" table existing. However, that was added in 1.0.9. So
something's a bit funky on that install.
Did you make a backup of the database bef
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for sending me that info.
So this actually has nothing to do with LDAP. I've seen this before once, on
Python 2.7 only. My guess is there's something that prevented the right
headers from reaching the server. Some sort of regression on their end (we
already know they broke uploadi
I'm happy to help, Sandeep :) I'm particularly glad it's working for you
now.
Merging databases is, well, nearly impossible right now. You'd end up with a
broken mess, since entries in tables reference others by ID, and those IDs
would change. A custom extraction/merging tool would need to be deve
Thanks Christian for the answer..
Sorry for not mentioning earlier mail, I was trying it on a test bed. The
steps which I was following is
1. Installed a fresh copy of 1.0.9 on a new server.
2. Took backup of the db from the production server and restore on the
test server of 1.0.9
3.
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> If i comment out that part of the code i.e ( def
> get_review_request_by_changenum) the posting of review request is progressed
> ahead. But as i told i am trying to get the review id from the changenum, I
> am not able to do so as you told that API has changed.
>
> Also HTTP Basi
Not sure if this is a double posting or re-asking for help. Did you see my
response about the "/" in the URL and the conditions on which the review
request will be shown in the results?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -
But the problem is I already tried post-review in checkout svn
directory(which contains a .svn folder), it still give me same words.
How to solve this? Isn't post-review support windows7?
On 9月27日, 下午4时24分, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Home has nothing to do with the checks. That's just for our ow
Hi Chris,
Apologies for confusion.
I did noticed your response and replied for help. Even after removing "/'
from the URL i am not able to proceed further. The URL which i create i
passed to "self.opener.open"
self.myurl = self.rbserver +
'/api/review-requests/?changenum=%s&repository=1' % chang
To determine if you're in a valid checkout, we run "svn info" and look for
the text "Repository Root". What do you see when you type that?
If the output is localized, that's the problem, though we already try to
force it to be English.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review
Hi Ben,
I'm going through a backlog of e-mail I missed.
If you upgrade to the latest RBTools release, this should be fixed.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Be
26 matches
Mail list logo
